Whig Party

| Main Article
| Discussion
| Related Articles  [?]
| Bibliography  [?]
| External Links  [?]
| Citable Version  [?]

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.

[edit intro]

This article deals with the Whig Party in the US in the 19th century. For the Whig party in Britain see Whig Party, Britain

The Whig Party was (along with the Democratic Party) one of the two main parties of the Second Party System in the United States, 1830 to mid-1850s. It operated in every state after its formation by Henry Clay in 1832 to promote modernizing policies and battle President Andrew Jackson's policies. Important leaders included Clay in Kentucky, Daniel Webster in Massachusetts, and Abraham Lincoln in Illinois. It elected its candidates for president in 1840 and 1848, but they both soon died. The party ran its last national candidate in 1852, then quickly collapsed because it could not keep together its northern and southern wings when the slavery issue came to dominate politics.

## Contents

* 1 Origins
* 2 Harrison-Tyler
* 3 Organization
* 4 Whig Issues
* 5 Whig Supporters
* 6 Demise and Legacy
* 7 See also
* 8 Bibliography
* 8.1 Primary Sources

## Origins[edit]

The Whigs were modernizers who saw President Andrew Jackson as a dangerous man on horseback with a reactionary opposition to the forces of social, economic and moral modernization. The Republicans who formed the Whig party, led by Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams, drew on a Jefferson tradition of compromise and balance in government, national unity, territorial expansion, and support for a national transportation network and domestic manufacturing. Jacksonians looked to Jefferson for opposition to the National Bank and internal improvements and support of egalitarian democracy and state power. Despite the apparent unity of Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans from 1800 to 1824, ultimately the American people preferred partisan opposition to popular political agreement.[1]

As Jackson purged his opponents, vetoed internal improvements and killed the Second Bank of the United States, alarmed local elites fought back. In 1831 Henry Clay re-entered the Senate and started planning a new party. He defended national rather than sectional interests. Clay's plan for distributing among the states the proceeds from the sale of lands in the public domain was intended to serve the nation by providing the states with funds for building roads and canals, which would stimulate growth and knit the sections together. His Jacksonian opponents, however, distrusted the federal government are opposed all federal aid for internal improvements and they again frustrated Clay's plan. The "Tariff of Abominations" of 1828 had outraged Southern feelings; the South's leaders held that the high duties on foreign imports gave an advantage to the North (where the factories were located). The somewhat revised tariff of 1832 also reflected Clay's high tariff prejudice which further disturbed Southerners provoking the Nullification Crisis. Clay however helped defuse the tense situation through the Compromise of 1833 which met Southern complaints by a gradual reduction of the rates on imports to a maximum of twenty percent. Controlling the Senate for a while, Whigs passed a censure motion denouncing Jackson's arrogant assumption of executive power in the face of the true will of the people as represented by Congress.

Clay ran as a Whig in 1832 against Jackson, but carried only 49 electoral votes against Jackson's 219. During the Bank War, Clay and his Whig allies failed in repeated attempts to continue the Second Bank of the United States, which Jackson denounced as a monopoly and from which he abruptly removed all government deposits. Clay was the unquestioned leader of the Whig party nationwide and in Washington, but he was vulnerable to Jacksonian allegations that he associated with the upper class at a time when white males without property had the right to vote and wanted someone more like themselves. When the Whigs nominated a war hero in 1840 and emphasized that William Henry Harrison had given up the high life to live in a log cabin on the frontier. Harrison won.

## Harrison-Tyler[edit]

The Whigs were ready to enact their programs in 1841 when Harrison died after 30 days and was succeeded by John Tyler, an old-line Democrat who never believed in Whiggery but was equally opposed to Jackson (which was how he ended up in the Whig Party). Factionalism ruined the party's program, as the Whigs expelled Tyler and he vetoed their bills. The Texas issue defeated Clay's last presidential bid in 1844. But in 1848 opportunity beckoned as the Democrats split. By ignoring Clay and nominating a famous war hero, General Zachary Taylor, the Whigs papered over their deepening splits on slavery, and won.

## Organization[edit]

Rejecting the automatic party loyalty that was the hallmark of tight Democratic party organization, the Whigs suffered from factionalism. On the other hand, they had a superb network of newspapers that provided an internal information system. In the 1840s Whigs won 49 percent of gubernatorial elections, with strong bases in the manufacturing Northeast and in the border states. The trend over time, however, was for the Democratic vote to grow faster, and for the Whigs to lose more and more marginal states and districts. After the close 1844 contest, the Democratic advantage widened and the Whigs could win the White House only if the Democrats split.

## Whig Issues[edit]

The Whigs celebrated Clay's vision of the "American System." They demanded government support for a more modern, market-oriented economy, in which skill, expertise, and bank credit would count for more than physical strength or land ownership. Whigs sought to promote faster industrialization through high tariffs, a business-oriented money supply based on a national bank, and a vigorous program of government-funded "internal improvements" (roads and canals). To modernize the inner American, the Whigs helped create public schools, private colleges, charities, and cultural institutions. The Democrats harkened to the Jeffersonian ideal of an egalitarian agricultural society, advising that traditional farm life bred republican simplicity, while modernization threatened to create a politically powerful caste of rich aristocrats who threatened to subvert democracy. In general the Democrats enacted their policies at the national level, while the Whigs succeeded in passing modernization projects in most states.

## Whig Supporters[edit]

The Whigs won votes in every social-economic class, including the poorest. They appealed more to the upper half of the social-economic scale. The Democrats likewise won support up and down the scale, but they often sharpened their appeals to the lower half by ridiculing the aristocratic pretensions of the Whigs. Most bankers, storekeepers, factory owners, master mechanics, clerks and professionals favored the Whigs. Commercially-oriented farmers in the North voted Whig, as did most large-scale planters in the South. In general, the commercial and manufacturing towns and cities were heavily Whig, save for Democratic wards filled with recent Irish Catholic and German immigrants. The 1830s saw waves of Protestant religious revivals, which injected a moralistic element into the Whig ranks. Non-religious individuals who found themselves targets of moralism, such as calls for prohibition, denounced the Whigs as Puritans and sought refuge in the Democratic Party.

## Demise and Legacy[edit]

The Whigs were unable to deal with the slavery issue after 1850. Their southern leaders nearly all owned slaves and were called "cotton Whigs." The northeastern Whigs, led by Daniel Webster, represented businessmen who loved the national flag and a national market, but cared little about slavery one way or another. However many Whig voters in the North felt that slavery was incompatible with a free labor-free market economy and supported the Wilmot Proviso. These anti-slavery whigs came to be known as "conscience Whigs." No one discovered a compromise that would keep the party united. Furthermore, the burgeoning economy made full-time careers in business or law much more attractive than politics for ambitious young Whigs. Thus the party leader in Illinois, Abraham Lincoln, simply abandoned politics after 1849. When new issues of nativism, prohibition, and anti-slavery burst on the scene in the mid 1850s, few Americans looked to the fast-disintegrating Whig party for answers.

By the mid-1850s, in the north, most ex-Whigs joined the new Republican Party, and in the South they flocked to a new short-lived American Party. During the Lincoln Administration, ex-Whigs, now as Republicans, enacted much of their economic nationalist program. Later their southern cousins dominated the white response to Reconstruction. In the long run, America adopted Whiggish economic policies coupled with a Democratic strong presidency.

## See also[edit]

* Jacksonian Democracy
* Federalist party
* American election campaigns, 19th century
* Second Party System
* Third Party System
* Democratic Party (United States), history

## Bibliography[edit]

* Alexander, Thomas B. "Persistent Whiggery in the Confederate South, 1860-1877," Journal of Southern History, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Aug., 1961), pp. 305-329 online at JSTOR
* Atkins, Jonathan M.; "The Whig Party versus the "spoilsmen" of Tennessee," The Historian, Vol. 57, 1994 online version
* Beveridge, Albert J. Abraham Lincoln, 1809–1858 (1928) online vol 1
* Brown, Thomas. Politics and Statesmanship: Essays on the American Whig Party, (1985) http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=35907993 online edition]
* Brown, David. "Jeffersonian Ideology and the Second Party System." Historian 1999 62(1): 17-30. Issn: 0018-2370 Fulltext: Ebsco
* Cole, Arthur Charles. The Whig Party in the South, (1913) online version
* Eric Foner. Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War (1970) online edition
* Formisano, Ronald P. "Political Character, Antipartyism, and the Second Party System," American Quarterly (1969) v 21 pp 683–709. in JSTOR
* Formisano, Ronald P. "Deferential-Participant Politics: The Early Republic's Political Culture, 1789–1840," American Political Science Review.. (June 1974), vol 68 pp 473–87. online at JSTOR
* Formisano, Ronald P. The Transformation of Political Culture: Massachusetts Parties, 1790s–1840s (1983)
* Fox, Dixon Ryan. "The Economic Status of the New York Whigs." Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4 (Dec., 1918), pp. 501-518 in JSTOR
* Hammond, Bray. Banks and Politics in America from the Revolution to the Civil War (1960), Pulitzer prize; the standard history. Pro-Bank
* Holt, Michael F. Political Parties and American Political Development: From the Age of Jackson to the Age of Lincoln, (1992)
* Holt, Michael F. The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War, (1999) 1000 pages; online edition
* Howe, Daniel Walker. What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (2007). 928pp; survey of the political history
* Howe, Daniel Walker. "The Evangelical Movement and Political Culture during the Second Party System," Journal of American History (1991) vol 77, pp 1216–39. online at JSTOR
* Kruman, Marc W. "The Second Party System and the Transformation of Revolutionary Republicanism," Journal of the Early Republic, (1992) v. 12, pp 509–37
* Lynn Marshall. "The Strange Stillbirth of the Whig Party," American Historical Review, (1967) v. pp. 445–68 at JSTOR
* McCormick, Richard P. The Second American Party System: Party Formation in the Jacksonian Era, (1966)
* Mueller, Henry R.; The Whig Party in Pennsylvania, (1922) online version
* Nevins, Allan. The Ordeal of the Union (1947) vol 1: Fruits of Manifest Destiny, 1847-1852; vol 2. A House Dividing, 1852-1857. highly detailed narrative of national politics
* Poage, George Rawlings. Henry Clay and the Whig Party (1936)
* Remini, Robert V. Henry Clay: Statesman for the Union, (1991), the standard biography
* Remini, Robert V. Daniel Webster (1997), the standard scholarly biography excerpt and text search
* Schlesinger, Arthur Meier, Jr. ed. History of American Presidential Elections, 1789–2000 (various multivolume editions, latest is 2001). For each election includes good scholarly history and selection of primary documents. Essays on the most important elections are reprinted in Schlesinger, The Coming to Power: Critical presidential elections in American history (1972)
* Shade, William G. "The Second Party System," in Paul Kleppner ed., Evolution of American Electoral Systems, (1983)
* Sharp, James Roger. The Jacksonians Versus the Banks: Politics in the States after the Panic of 1837 (1970) online edition
* Silbey, Joel H. The American Political Nation, 1838–1893. (1991) online edition
* Smith, Craig R. "Daniel Webster's Epideictic Speaking: A Study in Emerging Whig Virtues" online edition
* Van Deusen, Glyndon G. Horace Greeley, Nineteenth-Century Crusader (1953) online edition
* Van Deusen, Glyndon G. "Some Aspects of Whig Thought and Theory in the Jacksonian Period," American Historical Review 63#2 (1952): 305-22 in JSTOR
* Van Deusen, Glyndon G. "Whig Party," in History of U.S. Political Parties, edited by Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (1973) pages=1:331–63
* Van Deusen, Glyndon G. Thurlow Weed, Wizard of the Lobby (1947) online edition
* Van Deusen, Glyndon G. "Thurlow Weed: A Character Study," American Historical Review 49, 3 (April 1944):427-440;in JSTOR
* Wilentz, Sean. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (2005), major scholarly synthesis excerpt and text search
* Wilson, Major L. Space, Time, and Freedom: The Quest for Nationality and the Irrepressible Conflict, 1815-1861 (1974) intellectual history of Whigs and Democrats online edition

### Primary Sources[edit]

* Daniel Walker Howe. The American Whigs: An Anthology, (1973) online edition
* Daniel Webster, Works various editions online

* * *

1. ↑ David Brown, "Jeffersonian Ideology and the Second Party System." Historian 1999 62(1): 17-30.

* * *