Law

Law is a set of rules that are created and enforced by governmental or societal institutions to regulate behavior,[1] with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate.[2][3][4] It has been variously described as a science[5][6] and as the art of justice.[7][8][9] State-enforced laws can be made by a legislature, resulting in statutes; by the executive through decrees and regulations; or by judges' decisions, which form precedent in common law jurisdictions. An autocrat may exercise those functions within their realm. The creation of laws themselves may be influenced by a constitution, written or tacit, and the rights encoded therein. The law shapes politics, economics, history and society in various ways and also serves as a mediator of relations between people.

Legal systems vary between jurisdictions, with their differences analysed in comparative law. In civil law jurisdictions, a legislature or other central body codifies and consolidates the law. In common law systems, judges may make binding case law through precedent,[10] although on occasion this may be overturned by a higher court or the legislature.[11] Religious law is in use in some religious communities and states, and has historically influenced secular law.[12][13][14][15][16]

The scope of law can be divided into two domains: public law concerns government and society, including constitutional law, administrative law, and criminal law; while private law deals with legal disputes between parties in areas such as contracts, property, torts, delicts and commercial law.[17] This distinction is stronger in civil law countries, particularly those with a separate system of administrative courts;[18][19] by contrast, the public-private law divide is less pronounced in common law jurisdictions.[20][21]

Law provides a source of scholarly inquiry into legal history,[22] philosophy,[23] economic analysis[24] and sociology.[25] Law also raises important and complex issues concerning equality, fairness, and justice.[26][27]

## Contents

* 1 Etymology
* 2 Philosophy of law
* 2.1 Analytical jurisprudence
* 2.2 Connection to morality and justice
* 3 History
* 4 Legal systems
* 4.1 Civil law
* 4.2 Common law and equity
* 4.3 Religious law
* 4.3.1 Canon law
* 4.3.2 Sharia law
* 4.4 Socialist law
* 5 Legal methods
* 6 Legal institutions
* 6.1 Judiciary
* 6.2 Legislature
* 6.3 Executive
* 6.4 Law enforcement
* 6.5 Bureaucracy
* 6.6 Legal profession
* 6.7 Civil society
* 7 Areas of law
* 7.1 International law
* 7.2 Constitutional and administrative law
* 7.3 Criminal law
* 7.4 Contract law
* 7.5 Torts and delicts
* 7.6 Property law
* 7.7 Trusts
* 8 Intersection with other fields
* 8.1 Economics
* 8.2 Sociology
* 9 See also
* 10 Notes
* 11 References
* 12 Bibliography
* 13 Further reading
* 14 External links

## Etymology

The word law, attested in Old English as lagu, comes from the Old Norse word lǫg. The singular form lag meant 'something laid or fixed' while its plural meant 'law'.[28]

## Philosophy of law

Main articles: Social:Jurisprudence and Philosophy of law

But what, after all, is a law? [...] When I say that the object of laws is always general, I mean that law considers subjects en masse and actions in the abstract, and never a particular person or action. [...] On this view, we at once see that it can no longer be asked whose business it is to make laws, since they are acts of the general will; nor whether the prince is above the law, since he is a member of the State; nor whether the law can be unjust, since no one is unjust to himself; nor how we can be both free and subject to the laws, since they are but registers of our wills.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, II, 6.[29]

The philosophy of law is commonly known as jurisprudence. Normative jurisprudence asks "what should law be?", while analytic jurisprudence asks "what is law?"

### Analytical jurisprudence

There have been several attempts to produce "a universally acceptable definition of law". In 1972, Baron Hampstead suggested that no such definition could be produced.[30] McCoubrey and White said that the question "what is law?" has no simple answer.[31] Glanville Williams said that the meaning of the word "law" depends on the context in which that word is used. He said that, for example, "early customary law" and "municipal law" were contexts where the word "law" had two different and irreconcilable meanings.[32] Thurman Arnold said that it is obvious that it is impossible to define the word "law" and that it is also equally obvious that the struggle to define that word should not ever be abandoned.[33] It is possible to take the view that there is no need to define the word "law" (e.g. "let's forget about generalities and get down to cases").[34]

One definition is that law is a system of rules and guidelines which are enforced through social institutions to govern behaviour.[1] In The Concept of Law, H. L. A. Hart argued that law is a "system of rules";[35] John Austin said law was "the command of a sovereign, backed by the threat of a sanction";[36] Ronald Dworkin describes law as an "interpretive concept" to achieve justice in his text titled Law's Empire;[37] and Joseph Raz argues law is an "authority" to mediate people's interests.[38] Oliver Wendell Holmes defined law as "the prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious."[39] In his Treatise on Law, Thomas Aquinas argues that law is a rational ordering of things, which concern the common good, that is promulgated by whoever is charged with the care of the community.[40] This definition has both positivist and naturalist elements.[41]

### Connection to morality and justice

See also: Philosophy:Rule according to higher law

Definitions of law often raise the question of the extent to which law incorporates morality.[42] John Austin's utilitarian answer was that law is "commands, backed by threat of sanctions, from a sovereign, to whom people have a habit of obedience".[36] Natural lawyers, on the other hand, such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, argue that law reflects essentially moral and unchangeable laws of nature. The concept of "natural law" emerged in ancient Greek philosophy concurrently and in connection with the notion of justice, and re-entered the mainstream of Western culture through the writings of Thomas Aquinas, notably his Treatise on Law.

Hugo Grotius, the founder of a purely rationalistic system of natural law, argued that law arises from both a social impulse—as Aristotle had indicated—and reason.[43] Immanuel Kant believed a moral imperative requires laws "be chosen as though they should hold as universal laws of nature".[44] Jeremy Bentham and his student Austin, following David Hume, believed that this conflated the "is" and what "ought to be" problem. Bentham and Austin argued for law's positivism; that real law is entirely separate from "morality".[45] Kant was also criticised by Friedrich Nietzsche, who rejected the principle of equality, and believed that law emanates from the will to power, and cannot be labeled as "moral" or "immoral".[46][47][48]

In 1934, the Austrian philosopher Hans Kelsen continued the positivist tradition in his book the Pure Theory of Law.[49] Kelsen believed that although law is separate from morality, it is endowed with "normativity", meaning we ought to obey it. While laws are positive "is" statements (e.g. the fine for reversing on a highway is €500); law tells us what we "should" do. Thus, each legal system can be hypothesised to have a 'basic norm' (German: Grundnorm) instructing us to obey. Kelsen's major opponent, Carl Schmitt, rejected both positivism and the idea of the rule of law because he did not accept the primacy of abstract normative principles over concrete political positions and decisions.[50] Therefore, Schmitt advocated a jurisprudence of the exception (state of emergency), which denied that legal norms could encompass all of the political experience.[51]

Later in the 20th century, H. L. A. Hart attacked Austin for his simplifications and Kelsen for his fiction in The Concept of Law.[52] Hart argued law is a system of rules, divided into primary (rules of conduct) and secondary ones (rules addressed to officials to administer primary rules). Secondary rules are further divided into rules of adjudication (to resolve legal disputes), rules of change (allowing laws to be varied) and the rule of recognition (allowing laws to be identified as valid). Two of Hart's students continued the debate: In his book Law's Empire, Ronald Dworkin attacked Hart and the positivists for their refusal to treat law as a moral issue. Dworkin argues that law is an "interpretive concept"[37] that requires judges to find the best fitting and most just solution to a legal dispute, given their Anglo-American constitutional traditions. Joseph Raz, on the other hand, defended the positivist outlook and criticised Hart's "soft social thesis" approach in The Authority of Law.[38] Raz argues that law is authority, identifiable purely through social sources and without reference to moral reasoning. In his view, any categorisation of rules beyond their role as authoritative instruments in mediation is best left to sociology, rather than jurisprudence.[53]

## History

Main article: Legal history

Template:Easy CSS image crop The history of law links closely to the development of civilization. Ancient Egyptian law, dating as far back as 3000 BC, was based on the concept of Ma'at and characterised by tradition, rhetorical speech, social equality and impartiality.[54][55][56] By the 22nd century BC, the ancient Sumerian ruler Ur-Nammu had formulated the first law code, which consisted of casuistic statements ("if … then ..."). Around 1760 BC, King Hammurabi further developed Babylonian law, by codifying and inscribing it in stone. Hammurabi placed several copies of his law code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as stelae, for the entire public to see; this became known as the Codex Hammurabi. The most intact copy of these stelae was discovered in the 19th century by British Assyriologists, and has since been fully transliterated and translated into various languages, including English, Italian, German, and French.[57]

The Old Testament dates back to 1280 BC and takes the form of moral imperatives as recommendations for a good society. The small Greek city-state, ancient Athens, from about the 8th century BC was the first society to be based on broad inclusion of its citizenry, excluding women and enslaved people. However, Athens had no legal science or single word for "law",[58] relying instead on the three-way distinction between divine law (thémis), human decree (nómos) and custom (díkē).[59] Yet Ancient Greek law contained major constitutional innovations in the development of democracy.[60]

Roman law was heavily influenced by Greek philosophy, but its detailed rules were developed by professional jurists and were highly sophisticated.[61][62] Over the centuries between the rise and decline of the Roman Empire, law was adapted to cope with the changing social situations and underwent major codification under Theodosius II and Justinian I.[lower-alpha 1] Although codes were replaced by custom and case law during the Early Middle Ages, Roman law was rediscovered around the 11th century when medieval legal scholars began to research Roman codes and adapt their concepts to the canon law, giving birth to the jus commune. Latin legal maxims (called brocards) were compiled for guidance. In medieval England, royal courts developed a body of precedent which later became the common law. A Europe-wide Law Merchant was formed so that merchants could trade with common standards of practice rather than with the many splintered facets of local laws. The Law Merchant, a precursor to modern commercial law, emphasised the freedom to contract and alienability of property.[63] As nationalism grew in the 18th and 19th centuries, the Law Merchant was incorporated into countries' local law under new civil codes. The Napoleonic and German Codes became the most influential. In contrast to English common law, which consists of enormous tomes of case law, codes in small books are easy to export and easy for judges to apply. However, today there are signs that civil and common law are converging.[64] EU law is codified in treaties, but develops through de facto precedent laid down by the European Court of Justice.[65]

The Constitution of India, ceremonially rendered as an illustrated and calligraphed manuscript.

Ancient India and China represent distinct traditions of law, and have historically had independent schools of legal theory and practice. The Arthashastra, probably compiled around 100 AD (although it contains older material), and the Manusmriti (c. 100–300 AD) were foundational treatises in India, and comprise texts considered authoritative legal guidance.[66] Manu's central philosophy was tolerance and pluralism, and was cited across Southeast Asia.[67] During the Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent, sharia was established by the Muslim sultanates and empires, most notably Mughal Empire's Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, compiled by emperor Aurangzeb and various scholars of Islam.[68][69] In India, the Hindu legal tradition, along with Islamic law, were both supplanted by common law when India became part of the British Empire.[70] Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore and Hong Kong also adopted the common law system. The Eastern Asia legal tradition reflects a unique blend of secular and religious influences.[71] Japan was the first country to begin modernising its legal system along Western lines, by importing parts of the French, but mostly the German Civil Code.[72] This partly reflected Germany's status as a rising power in the late 19th century.

Similarly, traditional Chinese law gave way to westernisation towards the final years of the Qing Dynasty in the form of six private law codes based mainly on the Japanese model of German law.[73] Today Taiwanese law retains the closest affinity to the codifications from that period, because of the split between Chiang Kai-shek's nationalists, who fled there, and Mao Zedong's communists who won control of the mainland in 1949. The current legal infrastructure in the People's Republic of China was heavily influenced by Soviet Socialist law, which essentially prioritises administrative law at the expense of private law rights.[74] Due to rapid industrialisation, today China is undergoing a process of reform, at least in terms of economic, if not social and political, rights. A new contract code in 1999 represented a move away from administrative domination.[75] Furthermore, after negotiations lasting fifteen years, in 2001 China joined the World Trade Organization.[76]

## Legal systems

Main articles: Comparative law, List of national legal systems, and Comparative legal history

In general, legal systems can be split between civil law and common law systems.[77] Modern scholars argue that the significance of this distinction has progressively declined. The numerous legal transplants, typical of modern law, result in the sharing of many features traditionally considered typical of either common law or civil law.[64][78] The third type of legal system is religious law, based on scriptures. The specific system that a country is ruled by is often determined by its history, connections with other countries, or its adherence to international standards. The sources that jurisdictions adopt as authoritatively binding are the defining features of any legal system.

Colour-coded map of the legal systems around the world, showing civil, common law, religious, customary and mixed legal systems.[79][additional citation(s) needed] Common law systems are shaded pink, and civil law systems are shaded blue/turquoise.

### Civil law

First page of the 1804 edition of the Napoleonic Code

Civil law is the legal system used in most countries around the world today. In civil law the sources recognised as authoritative are, primarily, legislation—especially codifications in constitutions or statutes passed by government—and custom.[lower-alpha 2] Codifications date back millennia, with one early example being the Babylonian Codex Hammurabi. Modern civil law systems essentially derive from legal codes issued by Byzantine Emperor Justinian I in the 6th century, which were rediscovered by 11th century Italy.[80] Roman law in the days of the Roman Republic and Empire was heavily procedural, and lacked a professional legal class.[81] Instead a lay magistrate, iudex, was chosen to adjudicate. Decisions were not published in any systematic way, so any case law that developed was disguised and almost unrecognised.[82] Each case was to be decided afresh from the laws of the State, which mirrors the (theoretical) unimportance of judges' decisions for future cases in civil law systems today. From 529 to 534 AD the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I codified and consolidated Roman law up until that point, so that what remained was one-twentieth of the mass of legal texts from before.[83] This became known as the Corpus Juris Civilis. As one legal historian wrote, "Justinian consciously looked back to the golden age of Roman law and aimed to restore it to the peak it had reached three centuries before."[84] The Justinian Code remained in force in the East until the fall of the Byzantine Empire. Western Europe, meanwhile, relied on a mix of the Theodosian Code and Germanic customary law until the Justinian Code was rediscovered in the 11th century, which scholars at the University of Bologna used to interpret their own laws.[85] Civil law codifications based closely on Roman law, alongside some influences from religious laws such as canon law, continued to spread throughout Europe until the Enlightenment. Then, in the 19th century, both France, with the Code Civil, and Germany, with the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, modernised their legal codes. Both these codes heavily influenced not only the law systems of the countries in continental Europe but also the Japanese and Korean legal traditions.[86][87] A central doctrine in continental European legal thinking, originating in German jurisprudence, is the concept of a Rechtsstaat, meaning that everyone is subjected to the law, especially governments.[88] Today, countries that have civil law systems range from Russia and Turkey to most of Central and Latin America.[89]

### Common law and equity

English memorial to the sealing of Magna Carta by King John

In common law legal systems, decisions by courts are explicitly acknowledged as law on equal footing with legislative statutes and executive regulations. The doctrine of precedent, or stare decisis (Latin for "to stand by decisions") means that decisions by higher courts bind lower courts to assure that similar cases reach similar results. In contrast, in civil law systems, legislative statutes are typically more detailed, and judicial decisions are shorter and less detailed because the adjudicator is only writing to decide the single case, rather than to set out reasoning that will guide future courts.

Common law originated from England and has been inherited by almost every country once tied to the British Empire (except Malta, Scotland, the U.S. state of Louisiana, and the Canadian province of Quebec). In medieval England during the Norman Conquest, the law varied shire-to-shire based on disparate tribal customs. The concept of a common law developed during the reign of Henry II during the late 12th century, when Henry appointed judges who had the authority to create an institutionalised and unified system of law common to the country. The next major step in the evolution of the common law came when King John was forced by his barons to agree a document limiting his authority to pass laws. The Magna Carta ("great charter") of 1215 also required that the King's entourage of judges hold their courts and judgments at "a certain place" rather than dispensing autocratic justice in unpredictable places about the country.[90] A concentrated and elite group of judges acquired a dominant role in law-making under this system, and compared to its European counterparts the English judiciary became highly centralised. In 1297, for instance, while the highest court in France had fifty-one judges, the English Court of Common Pleas had five.[91] This powerful and tight-knit judiciary gave rise to a systematised process of developing common law.[92]

The Court of Chancery, London, England, early 19th century

As time went on, many felt that the common law was overly systematised and inflexible, and increasing numbers of citizens petitioned the King to override the common law. On the King's behalf, the Lord Chancellor started giving judgments to do what was equitable in a case. From the time of Sir Thomas More, the first lawyer to be appointed as Lord Chancellor, a systematic body of equity grew up alongside the rigid common law, and developed its own Court of Chancery. At first, equity was often criticised as erratic.[93] Over time, courts of equity developed solid principles, especially under Lord Eldon.[94] In the 19th century in England, and in 1937 in the U.S., the two systems were merged.

In developing the common law, academic writings have always played an important part, both to collect overarching principles from dispersed case law and to argue for change. William Blackstone, from around 1760, was the first scholar to collect, describe, and teach the common law.[95] But merely in describing, scholars who sought explanations and underlying structures slowly changed the way the law actually worked.[96]

### Religious law

See also: Religion:Law and religion

Religious law is explicitly based on religious precepts. Examples include the Jewish Halakha and Islamic Sharia—both of which translate as the "path to follow". Christian canon law also survives in some church communities. Often the implication of religion for law is unalterability because the word of God cannot be amended or legislated against by judges or governments.[97] Nonetheless, most religious jurisdictions rely on further human elaboration to provide for thorough and detailed legal systems. For instance, the Quran has some law, and it acts as a source of further law through interpretation, Qiyas (reasoning by analogy), Ijma (consensus) and precedent.[98] This is mainly contained in a body of law and jurisprudence known as Sharia and Fiqh respectively. Another example is the Torah or Old Testament, in the Pentateuch or Five Books of Moses. This contains the basic code of Jewish law, which some Israeli communities choose to use. The Halakha is a code of Jewish law that summarizes some of the Talmud's interpretations.

A number of countries are sharia jurisdictions. Israeli law allows litigants to use religious laws only if they choose. Canon law is only in use by members of the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Anglican Communion.

#### Canon law

Main article: Religion:Canon law

File:Graverat titelblad till "Kanonisk rätt" \- Skoklosters slott - 93238.tif

Canon law (Ancient Greek: κανών, romanized: kanon, lit. 'a straight measuring rod; a ruler') is a set of ordinances and regulations made by ecclesiastical authority, for the government of a Christian organisation or church and its members. It is the internal ecclesiastical law governing the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, and the individual national churches within the Anglican Communion.[99] The way that such church law is legislated, interpreted and at times adjudicated varies widely among these three bodies of churches. In all three traditions, a canon was originally[100] a rule adopted by a church council; these canons formed the foundation of canon law.

The Catholic Church has the oldest continuously functioning legal system in the western world,[101][102] predating the evolution of modern European civil law and common law systems. The 1983 Code of Canon Law governs the Latin Church sui juris. The Eastern Catholic Churches, which developed different disciplines and practices, are governed by the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches.[103] The canon law of the Catholic Church influenced the common law during the medieval period through its preservation of Roman law doctrine such as the presumption of innocence.[104][lower-alpha 3]

Roman Catholic canon law is a fully developed legal system, with all the necessary elements: courts, lawyers, judges, a fully articulated legal code, principles of legal interpretation, and coercive penalties, though it lacks civilly-binding force in most secular jurisdictions.[106]

#### Sharia law

Main article: Religion:Sharia

Further information: Sources of Sharia

Until the 18th century, Sharia law was practiced throughout the Muslim world in a non-codified form, with the Ottoman Empire's Mecelle code in the 19th century being a first attempt at codifying elements of Sharia law. Since the mid-1940s, efforts have been made, in country after country, to bring Sharia law more into line with modern conditions and conceptions.[107][108] In modern times, the legal systems of many Muslim countries draw upon both civil and common law traditions as well as Islamic law and custom. The constitutions of certain Muslim states, such as Egypt and Afghanistan, recognise Islam as the religion of the state, obliging legislature to adhere to Sharia.[109] Saudi Arabia recognises the Quran as its constitution, and is governed on the basis of Islamic law.[110] Iran has also witnessed a reiteration of Islamic law into its legal system after 1979.[111] During the last few decades, one of the fundamental features of the movement of Islamic resurgence has been the call to restore the Sharia, which has generated a vast amount of literature and affected world politics.[112]

### Socialist law

Main article: Social:Socialist law

Socialist law is the legal systems in communist states such as the former Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China.[113] Academic opinion is divided on whether it is a separate system from civil law, given major deviations based on Marxist–Leninist ideology, such as subordinating the judiciary to the executive ruling party.[113][114][115]

## Legal methods

There are distinguished methods of legal reasoning (applying the law) and methods of interpreting (construing) the law. The former are legal syllogism, which holds sway in civil law legal systems, analogy, which is present in common law legal systems, especially in the US, and argumentative theories that occur in both systems. The latter are different rules (directives) of legal interpretation such as directives of linguistic interpretation, teleological interpretation or systemic interpretation as well as more specific rules, for instance, golden rule or mischief rule. There are also many other arguments and cannons of interpretation which altogether make statutory interpretation possible.

Law professor and former United States Attorney General Edward H. Levi noted that the "basic pattern of legal reasoning is reasoning by example"—that is, reasoning by comparing outcomes in cases resolving similar legal questions.[116] In a U.S. Supreme Court case regarding procedural efforts taken by a debt collection company to avoid errors, Justice Sotomayor cautioned that "legal reasoning is not a mechanical or strictly linear process".[117]

Jurimetrics is the formal application of quantitative methods, especially probability and statistics, to legal questions. The use of statistical methods in court cases and law review articles has grown massively in importance in the last few decades.[118][119]

## Legal institutions

It is a real unity of them all in one and the same person, made by covenant of every man with every man, in such manner as if every man should say to every man: I authorise and give up my right of governing myself to this man, or to this assembly of men, on this condition; that thou givest up, thy right to him, and authorise all his actions in like manner.

Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, XVII

The main institutions of law in industrialised countries are independent courts, representative parliaments, an accountable executive, the military and police, bureaucratic organisation, the legal profession and civil society itself. John Locke, in his Two Treatises of Government, and Baron de Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws, advocated for a separation of powers between the political, legislature and executive bodies.[120] Their principle was that no person should be able to usurp all powers of the state, in contrast to the absolutist theory of Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan.[121] Sun Yat-sen's Five Power Constitution for the Republic of China took the separation of powers further by having two additional branches of government—a Control Yuan for auditing oversight and an Examination Yuan to manage the employment of public officials.[122]

Max Weber and others reshaped thinking on the extension of state. Modern military, policing and bureaucratic power over ordinary citizens' daily lives pose special problems for accountability that earlier writers such as Locke or Montesquieu could not have foreseen. The custom and practice of the legal profession is an important part of people's access to justice, whilst civil society is a term used to refer to the social institutions, communities and partnerships that form law's political basis.

### Judiciary

This section is an excerpt from Judiciary[ edit ]

This section is an excerpt from Judiciary § Meaning[ edit ]

### Legislature

Main article: Social:Legislature

The Chamber of the House of Representatives, the lower house in the National Diet of Japan

Prominent examples of legislatures are the Houses of Parliament in London, the Congress in Washington, D.C., the Bundestag in Berlin, the Duma in Moscow, the Parlamento Italiano in Rome and the Assemblée nationale in Paris. By the principle of representative government people vote for politicians to carry out their wishes. Although countries like Israel, Greece, Sweden and China are unicameral, most countries are bicameral, meaning they have two separately appointed legislative houses.[123]

In the 'lower house' politicians are elected to represent smaller constituencies. The 'upper house' is usually elected to represent states in a federal system (as in Australia, Germany or the United States) or different voting configuration in a unitary system (as in France). In the UK the upper house is appointed by the government as a house of review. One criticism of bicameral systems with two elected chambers is that the upper and lower houses may simply mirror one another. The traditional justification of bicameralism is that an upper chamber acts as a house of review. This can minimise arbitrariness and injustice in governmental action.[123]

To pass legislation, a majority of the members of a legislature must vote for a bill (proposed law) in each house. Normally there will be several readings and amendments proposed by the different political factions. If a country has an entrenched constitution, a special majority for changes to the constitution may be required, making changes to the law more difficult. A government usually leads the process, which can be formed from Members of Parliament (e.g. the UK or Germany). However, in a presidential system, the government is usually formed by an executive and his or her appointed cabinet officials (e.g. the United States or Brazil).[lower-alpha 4]

### Executive

Main article: Social:Executive (government)

The G20 meetings are composed of representatives of each country's executive branch.

The executive in a legal system serves as the centre of political authority of the State. In a parliamentary system, as with Britain, Italy, Germany, India, and Japan, the executive is known as the cabinet, and composed of members of the legislature. The executive is led by the head of government, whose office holds power under the confidence of the legislature. Because popular elections appoint political parties to govern, the leader of a party can change in between elections.[124]

The head of state is apart from the executive, and symbolically enacts laws and acts as representative of the nation. Examples include the President of Germany (appointed by members of federal and state legislatures), the Queen of the United Kingdom (an hereditary office), and the President of Austria (elected by popular vote). The other important model is the presidential system, found in the United States and in Brazil. In presidential systems, the executive acts as both head of state and head of government, and has power to appoint an unelected cabinet. Under a presidential system, the executive branch is separate from the legislature to which it is not accountable.[124][125]

Although the role of the executive varies from country to country, usually it will propose the majority of legislation, and propose government agenda. In presidential systems, the executive often has the power to veto legislation. Most executives in both systems are responsible for foreign relations, the law enforcement, and the bureaucracy. Ministers or other officials head a country's public offices, such as a foreign ministry or defence ministry. The election of a different executive is therefore capable of revolutionising an entire country's approach to government.

### Law enforcement

Officers of the South African Police Service in Johannesburg, 2010

Max Weber famously argued that the state is that which controls the monopoly on the legitimate use of force.[126][127] The military and police carry out law enforcement at the request of the government or the courts. The term failed state refers to states that cannot implement or enforce policies; their police and military no longer control security and order and society moves into anarchy, the absence of government.[lower-alpha 5] While military organisations have existed as long as government itself, the idea of a standing police force is a relatively modern concept. For example, Medieval England's system of travelling criminal courts, or assizes, used show trials and public executions to instill communities with fear to maintain control.[128] The first modern police were probably those in 17th-century Paris, in the court of Louis XIV,[129] although the Paris Prefecture of Police claim they were the world's first uniformed policemen.[130]

### Bureaucracy

Main article: Organization:Bureaucracy

The mandarins were powerful bureaucrats in imperial China (photograph shows a Qing dynasty official with mandarin square visible).

The etymology of bureaucracy derives from the French word for office (bureau) and the Ancient Greek for word power (kratos).[131] Like the military and police, a legal system's government servants and bodies that make up its bureaucracy carry out the directives of the executive. One of the earliest references to the concept was made by Baron de Grimm, a German author who lived in France. In 1765, he wrote:

> The real spirit of the laws in France is that bureaucracy of which the late Monsieur de Gournay used to complain so greatly; here the offices, clerks, secretaries, inspectors and intendants are not appointed to benefit the public interest, indeed the public interest appears to have been established so that offices might exist.[132]

Cynicism over "officialdom" is still common, and the workings of public servants is typically contrasted to private enterprise motivated by profit.[133] In fact private companies, especially large ones, also have bureaucracies.[134] Negative perceptions of "red tape" aside, public services such as schooling, health care, policing or public transport are considered a crucial state function making public bureaucratic action the locus of government power.[134]

Writing in the early 20th century, Max Weber believed that a definitive feature of a developed state had come to be its bureaucratic support.[135] Weber wrote that the typical characteristics of modern bureaucracy are that officials define its mission, the scope of work is bound by rules, and management is composed of career experts who manage top down, communicating through writing and binding public servants' discretion with rules.[136]

### Legal profession

Main article: Social:Legal profession

Judges presiding over the Nuremberg trials at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Allied-occupied Germany, 1946

A corollary of the rule of law is the existence of a legal profession sufficiently autonomous to invoke the authority of the independent judiciary; the right to assistance of a barrister in a court proceeding emanates from this corollary—in England the function of barrister or advocate is distinguished from legal counselor.[137] As the European Court of Human Rights has stated, the law should be adequately accessible to everyone and people should be able to foresee how the law affects them.[138]

In order to maintain professionalism, the practice of law is typically overseen by either a government or independent regulating body such as a bar association, bar council or law society. Modern lawyers achieve distinct professional identity through specified legal procedures (e.g. successfully passing a qualifying examination), are required by law to have a special qualification (a legal education earning the student a Bachelor of Laws, a Bachelor of Civil Law, or a Juris Doctor degree. Higher academic degrees may also be pursued. Examples include a Master of Laws, a Master of Legal Studies, a Bar Professional Training Course or a Doctor of Laws.), and are constituted in office by legal forms of appointment (being admitted to the bar). There are few titles of respect to signify famous lawyers, such as Esquire, to indicate barristers of greater dignity,[139][140] and Doctor of law, to indicate a person who obtained a PhD in Law.

Many Muslim countries have developed similar rules about legal education and the legal profession, but some still allow lawyers with training in traditional Islamic law to practice law before personal status law courts.[141] In China and other developing countries there are not sufficient professionally trained people to staff the existing judicial systems, and, accordingly, formal standards are more relaxed.[142]

Once accredited, a lawyer will often work in a law firm, in a chambers as a sole practitioner, in a government post or in a private corporation as an internal counsel. In addition a lawyer may become a legal researcher who provides on-demand legal research through a library, a commercial service or freelance work. Many people trained in law put their skills to use outside the legal field entirely.[143]

Significant to the practice of law in the common law tradition is the legal research to determine the current state of the law. This usually entails exploring case-law reports, legal periodicals and legislation. Law practice also involves drafting documents such as court pleadings, persuasive briefs, contracts, or wills and trusts. Negotiation and dispute resolution skills (including ADR techniques) are also important to legal practice, depending on the field.[143]

### Civil society

Main article: Social:Civil society

A march in Washington, D.C. during the American civil rights movement in 1963

The Classical republican concept of "civil society" dates back to Hobbes and Locke.[144] Locke saw civil society as people who have "a common established law and judicature to appeal to, with authority to decide controversies between them."[145] German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel distinguished the "state" from "civil society" (German: bürgerliche Gesellschaft) in Elements of the Philosophy of Right.[146][147]

Hegel believed that civil society and the state were polar opposites, within the scheme of his dialectic theory of history. The modern dipole state–civil society was reproduced in the theories of Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx.[148][149] In post-modern theory, civil society is necessarily a source of law, by being the basis from which people form opinions and lobby for what they believe law should be. As Australian barrister and author Geoffrey Robertson QC wrote of international law, "one of its primary modern sources is found in the responses of ordinary men and women, and of the non-governmental organizations which many of them support, to the human rights abuses they see on the television screen in their living rooms."[150]

Freedom of speech, freedom of association and many other individual rights allow people to gather, discuss, criticise and hold to account their governments, from which the basis of a deliberative democracy is formed. The more people are involved with, concerned by and capable of changing how political power is exercised over their lives, the more acceptable and legitimate the law becomes to the people. The most familiar institutions of civil society include economic markets, profit-oriented firms, families, trade unions, hospitals, universities, schools, charities, debating clubs, non-governmental organisations, neighbourhoods, churches, and religious associations. There is no clear legal definition of the civil society, and of the institutions it includes. Most of the institutions and bodies who try to give a list of institutions (such as the European Economic and Social Committee) exclude the political parties.[151][152][153]

## Areas of law

All legal systems deal with the same basic issues, but jurisdictions categorise and identify their legal topics in different ways. A common distinction is that between "public law" (a term related closely to the state, and including constitutional, administrative and criminal law), and "private law" (which covers contract, tort and property).[lower-alpha 6] In civil law systems, contract and tort fall under a general law of obligations, while trusts law is dealt with under statutory regimes or international conventions. International, constitutional and administrative law, criminal law, contract, tort, property law and trusts are regarded as the "traditional core subjects",[lower-alpha 7] although there are many further disciplines.

### International law

Further information: Sources of international law

See also: Conflict of laws, European Union law, and Public international law

This section is an excerpt from International law[ edit ]

### Constitutional and administrative law

The 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen

Constitutional and administrative law govern the affairs of the state. Constitutional law concerns both the relationships between the executive, legislature and judiciary and the human rights or civil liberties of individuals against the state. Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a single codified constitution with a bill of rights. A few, like the United Kingdom, have no such document. A "constitution" is simply those laws which constitute the body politic, from statute, case law and convention.

The fundamental constitutional principle, inspired by John Locke, holds that the individual can do anything except that which is forbidden by law, and the state may do nothing except that which is authorised by law.[154][155] Administrative law is the chief method for people to hold state bodies to account. People (wheresoever allowed) may potentially have prerogative to legally challenge (or sue) an agency, local council, public service, or government ministry for judicial review of the offending edict (law, ordinance, policy order). Such challenge vets the ability of actionable authority under the law, and that the government entity observed required procedure. The first specialist administrative court was the Conseil d'État set up in 1799, as Napoleon assumed power in France.[156]

A sub-discipline of constitutional law is election law. It along with Elections commissions, councils, or committees deal with policy and procedures facilitating elections. These rules settle disputes or enable the translation of the will of the people into functioning democracies. Election law addresses issues who is entitled to vote, voter registration, ballot access, campaign finance and party funding, redistricting, apportionment, electronic voting and voting machines, accessibility of elections, election systems and formulas, vote counting, election disputes, referendums, and issues such as electoral fraud and electoral silence.

### Criminal law

Main article: Social:Criminal law

Criminal law, also known as penal law, pertains to crimes and punishment.[157] It thus regulates the definition of and penalties for offences found to have a sufficiently deleterious social impact but, in itself, makes no moral judgment on an offender nor imposes restrictions on society that physically prevent people from committing a crime in the first place.[158][159] Investigating, apprehending, charging, and trying suspected offenders is regulated by the law of criminal procedure.[160] The paradigm case of a crime lies in the proof, beyond reasonable doubt, that a person is guilty of two things. First, the accused must commit an act which is deemed by society to be criminal, or actus reus (guilty act).[161] Second, the accused must have the requisite malicious intent to do a criminal act, or mens rea (guilty mind). However, for so called "strict liability" crimes, an actus reus is enough.[162] Criminal systems of the civil law tradition distinguish between intention in the broad sense (dolus directus and dolus eventualis), and negligence. Negligence does not carry criminal responsibility unless a particular crime provides for its punishment.[163][164]

Adolf Eichmann (standing in glass booth at left) being sentenced to death at the conclusion of his 1961 trial, an example of a criminal law proceeding

Examples of crimes include murder, assault, fraud and theft. In exceptional circumstances defences can apply to specific acts, such as killing in self defence, or pleading insanity. Another example is in the 19th-century English case of R v Dudley and Stephens, which tested whether a defence of "necessity" could justify murder and cannibalism to survive a shipwreck.[165]

Criminal law offences are viewed as offences against not just individual victims, but the community as well.[158][159] The state, usually with the help of police, takes the lead in prosecution, which is why in common law countries cases are cited as "The People v ..." or "R (for Rex or Regina) v ...". Also, lay juries are often used to determine the guilt of defendants on points of fact: juries cannot change legal rules. Some developed countries still condone capital punishment for criminal activity, but the normal punishment for a crime will be imprisonment, fines, state supervision (such as probation), or community service. Modern criminal law has been affected considerably by the social sciences, especially with respect to sentencing, legal research, legislation, and rehabilitation.[166] On the international field, 111 countries are members of the International Criminal Court, which was established to try people for crimes against humanity.[167]

### Contract law

Main article: Finance:Contract

The famous Carbolic Smoke Ball advertisement to cure influenza was held to be a unilateral contract.

Contract law concerns enforceable promises, and can be summed up in the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).[168] In common law jurisdictions, three key elements to the creation of a contract are necessary: offer and acceptance, consideration and the intention to create legal relations.

Consideration indicates the fact that all parties to a contract have exchanged something of value. Some common law systems, including Australia, are moving away from the idea of consideration as a requirement. The idea of estoppel or culpa in contrahendo, can be used to create obligations during pre-contractual negotiations.[169]

Civil law jurisdictions treat contracts differently in a number of respects, with a more interventionist role for the state in both the formation and enforcement of contracts.[170] Compared to common law jurisdictions, civil law systems incorporate more mandatory terms into contracts, allow greater latitude for courts to interpret and revise contract terms and impose a stronger duty of good faith, but are also more likely to enforce penalty clauses and specific performance of contracts.[170] They also do not require consideration for a contract to be binding.[171] In France, an ordinary contract is said to form simply on the basis of a "meeting of the minds" or a "concurrence of wills". Germany has a special approach to contracts, which ties into property law. Their 'abstraction principle' (Abstraktionsprinzip) means that the personal obligation of contract forms separately from the title of property being conferred. When contracts are invalidated for some reason (e.g. a car buyer is so drunk that he lacks legal capacity to contract)[172] the contractual obligation to pay can be invalidated separately from the proprietary title of the car. Unjust enrichment law, rather than contract law, is then used to restore title to the rightful owner.[173]

### Torts and delicts

Main articles: Delict and Tort

Certain civil wrongs are grouped together as torts under common law systems and delicts under civil law systems.[174] To have acted tortiously, one must have breached a duty to another person, or infringed some pre-existing legal right. A simple example might be unintentionally hitting someone with a ball.[175] Under the law of negligence, the most common form of tort, the injured party could potentially claim compensation for their injuries from the party responsible. The principles of negligence are illustrated by Donoghue v Stevenson.[lower-alpha 8] A friend of Donoghue ordered an opaque bottle of ginger beer (intended for the consumption of Donoghue) in a café in Paisley. Having consumed half of it, Donoghue poured the remainder into a tumbler. The decomposing remains of a snail floated out. She claimed to have suffered from shock, fell ill with gastroenteritis and sued the manufacturer for carelessly allowing the drink to be contaminated. The House of Lords decided that the manufacturer was liable for Mrs Donoghue's illness. Lord Atkin took a distinctly moral approach and said:

> The liability for negligence [...] is no doubt based upon a general public sentiment of moral wrongdoing for which the offender must pay. [...] The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer's question, Who is my neighbour? receives a restricted reply. You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.[176]

This became the basis for the four principles of negligence, namely that:

1. Stevenson owed Donoghue a duty of care to provide safe drinks;
2. he breached his duty of care;
3. the harm would not have occurred but for his breach; and
4. his act was the proximate cause of her harm.[lower-alpha 8]

Another example of tort might be a neighbour making excessively loud noises with machinery on his property.[177] Under a nuisance claim the noise could be stopped. Torts can also involve intentional acts such as assault, battery or trespass. A better known tort is defamation, which occurs, for example, when a newspaper makes unsupportable allegations that damage a politician's reputation.[178] More infamous are economic torts, which form the basis of labour law in some countries by making trade unions liable for strikes,[179] when statute does not provide immunity.[lower-alpha 9]

### Property law

The South Sea Bubble by Edward Matthew Ward. The South Sea Bubble in 1720, one of the world's first ever speculations and crashes, led to strict regulation on share trading.[180]

Property law governs ownership and possession. Real property, sometimes called 'real estate', refers to ownership of land and things attached to it.[181] Personal property, refers to everything else; movable objects, such as computers, cars, jewelry or intangible rights, such as stocks and shares. A right in rem is a right to a specific piece of property, contrasting to a right in personam which allows compensation for a loss, but not a particular thing back. Land law forms the basis for most kinds of property law, and is the most complex. It concerns mortgages, rental agreements, licences, covenants, easements and the statutory systems for land registration. Regulations on the use of personal property fall under intellectual property, company law, trusts and commercial law.

A representative example of property law is the 1722 suit of Armory v Delamirie, applying English law.[182] A child was deprived of possession of the gemstones that had been set in piece of jewellery, by the businessperson entrusted to appraise the piece. The court articulated that, according to the view of property in common law jurisdictions, the person who can show the best claim to a piece of property, against any contesting party, is the owner.[183] By contrast, the classic civil law approach to property, propounded by Friedrich Carl von Savigny, is that it is a right good against the world. Obligations, like contracts and torts, are conceptualised as rights good between individuals.[184] The idea of property raises many further philosophical and political issues. Locke argued that our "lives, liberties and estates" are our property because we own our bodies and mix our labour with our surroundings.[185]

### Trusts

Main article: Social:Trust law

In historical English law, the common law did not permit dividing the ownership from the control of one piece of property—but the law of equity did recognize this through an arrangement known as a trust. Trustees control property whereas the beneficial, or equitable, ownership of trust property is held by people known as beneficiaries. Trustees owe duties to their beneficiaries to take good care of the entrusted property.[186] Another example of a trustee's duty might be to invest property wisely or sell it.[187] This is especially the case for pension funds, the most important form of trust, where investors are trustees for people's savings until retirement. But trusts can also be set up for charitable purposes.

Some international norms for the structure and regulation of trusts are set out in the Hague Trust Convention of 1985.

## Intersection with other fields

### Economics

Main article: Philosophy:Law and economics

In the 18th century, Adam Smith presented a philosophical foundation for explaining the relationship between law and economics.[lower-alpha 10] The discipline arose partly out of a critique of trade unions and U.S. antitrust law. The most prominent economic analyst of law is Ronald Coase, whose first major article, The Nature of the Firm (1937), argued that the reason for the existence of firms (companies, partnerships, etc.) is the existence of transaction costs.[188] Rational individuals trade through bilateral contracts on open markets until the costs of transactions mean that using corporations to produce things is more cost-effective. His second major article, The Problem of Social Cost (1960), argued that if we lived in a world without transaction costs, people would bargain with one another to create the same allocation of resources, regardless of the way a court might rule in property disputes. He contended that law ought to be pre-emptive, and be guided by the most efficient solution.[189]

Many members of the so-called Chicago School are generally advocates of deregulation and privatisation, and are hostile to state regulation or what they see as restrictions on the operation of free markets.[190]

### Sociology

The sociology of law examines the interaction of law with society and overlaps with jurisprudence, philosophy of law, social theory and more specialised subjects such as criminology.[191][192] It is a transdisciplinary and multidisciplinary study focused on the theorisation and empirical study of legal practices and experiences as social phenomena. The institutions of social construction, social norms, dispute processing and legal culture are key areas for inquiry in this knowledge field. In the United States, the field is usually called law and society studies; in Europe, it is more often referred to as socio-legal studies. At first, jurists and legal philosophers were suspicious of sociology of law. Kelsen attacked one of its founders, Eugen Ehrlich, who sought to make clear the differences and connections between positive law, which lawyers learn and apply, and other forms of 'law' or social norms that regulate everyday life, generally preventing conflicts from reaching lawyers and courts.[193] Contemporary research in the sociology of law is concerned with the way that law develops outside discrete state jurisdictions, being produced through social interaction in social arenas, and acquiring a diversity of sources of authority in national and transnational communal networks.[194]

Max Weber, who began his career as a lawyer, and is regarded as one of the founders of sociology and sociology of law

Around 1900, Max Weber defined his "scientific" approach to law, identifying the "legal rational form" as a type of domination, not attributable to personal authority but to the authority of abstract norms.[195] Formal legal rationality was his term for the key characteristic of the kind of coherent and calculable law that was a precondition for modern political developments and the modern bureaucratic state. Weber saw this law as having developed in parallel with the growth of capitalism.[191][192] Another sociologist, Émile Durkheim, wrote in his classic work The Division of Labour in Society that as society becomes more complex, the body of civil law concerned primarily with restitution and compensation grows at the expense of criminal laws and penal sanctions.[196][197] Other notable early legal sociologists included Hugo Sinzheimer, Theodor Geiger, Georges Gurvitch and Leon Petrażycki in Europe, and William Graham Sumner in the U.S.[198][199]

## See also

Library resources about
Law

* * *

* Resources in your library
* Resources in other libraries

* By-law
* Justice
* Law dictionary
* Legal industry by country
* Legal research in the United States
* Legal treatise
* Outline of law
* Political science
* Pseudolaw
* Public interest law
* Social law
* Sources of law
* Translating "law" to other European languages

## Notes

1. ↑ As a legal system, Roman law has affected the development of law worldwide. It also forms the basis for the law codes of most countries of continental Europe and has played an important role in the creation of the idea of a common European culture (Stein, Roman Law in European History, 2, 104–107).
2. ↑ Civil law jurisdictions recognise custom as "the other source of law"; hence, scholars tend to divide the civil law into the broad categories of "written law" (ius scriptum) or legislation, and "unwritten law" (ius non-scriptum) or custom. Yet they tend to dismiss custom as being of slight importance compared to legislation (Georgiadis, General Principles of Civil Law, 19; Washofsky, Taking Precedent Seriously, 7).
3. ↑ «In one of his elaborate orations in the United States Senate Mr. Charles Sumner spoke of "the generous presumption of the common law in favor of the innocence of an accused person;" yet it must be admitted that such a presumption cannot be found in Anglo-Saxon law, where sometimes the presumption seems to have been the other way. And in a very recent case in the Supreme Court of the United States, the case of Coffin, 156 U. S. 432, it is pointed out that this presumption was fully established in the Roman law, and was preserved in the canon law.»[105]
4. ↑ About "cabinet accountability" in both presidential and parliamentary systems, see Shugart–Haggard, Presidential Systems, 67 etc.
5. ↑ In these cases sovereignty is eroded, and often warlords acquire excessive powers (Fukuyama, State-Building, 166–167).
6. ↑ Although many scholars argue that "the boundaries between public and private law are becoming blurred", and that this distinction has become mere "folklore" (Bergkamp, Liability and Environment, 1–2).
7. ↑ E.g. in England these seven subjects, with EU law substituted for international law, make up a "qualifying law degree". For criticism, see Peter Birks' poignant comments attached to a previous version of the Notice to Law Schools .
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Donoghue v Stevenson ([1932] A.C. 532, 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31, [1932] All ER Rep 1). See the original text of the case in UK Law Online .
9. ↑ In the UK, Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; cf. in the U.S., National Labor Relations Act
10. ↑ According to Malloy, Smith established "a classical liberal philosophy that made individuals the key referential sign while acknowledging that we live not alone but in community with others".(Law and Economics, 114)

## References

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Robertson 2006, p. 90.
2. ↑ Willis 1926.
3. ↑ Gibbs, Jack P. (1968). "Definitions of Law and Empirical Questions". Law & Society Review 2 (3): 429–446. doi:10.2307/3052897. ISSN 0023-9216.
4. ↑ Akers, Ronald L. (1965). "Toward a Comparative Definition of Law". Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 56 (3): 301–306. doi:10.2307/1141239. ISSN 0022-0205. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5313&context=jclc. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
5. ↑ Spooner, Lysander (1882). Natural Law; or The Science of Justice: A Treatise on Natural Law, Natural Justice, Natural Rights, Natural Liberty, and Natural Society; Showing that All Legislation Whatsoever is an Absurdity, a Usurpation, and a Crime. Part First.. A. Williams & Co.. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Natural_Law;_or_The_Science_of_Justice:_A_Treatise_on_Natural_Law,_Natural_Justice,_Natural_Rights,_Natural_Liberty,_and_Natural_Society;_Showing_that_All_Legislation_Whatsoever_is_an_Absurdity,_a_Usurpation,_and_a_Crime._Part_First.. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
6. ↑ Núñez Vaquero, Álvaro (10 June 2013). "Five Models of Legal Science" (in en). Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava (19): 53–81. doi:10.4000/revus.2449. ISSN 1581-7652. https://journals.openedition.org/revus/2449. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
7. ↑ Cohen 1992.
8. ↑ Rubin, Basha (13 January 2015). "Is Law an Art or a Science?: A Bit of Both". https://www.forbes.com/sites/basharubin/2015/01/13/is-law-an-art-or-a-science-a-bit-of-both/.
9. ↑ Berger 1953, p. 525.
10. ↑ Mason, Anthony (1996). "The Judge as Law-maker". James Cook University Mayo Lecture. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/JCULRev/1996/2.pdf. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
11. ↑ Devins, Neal (2008). "Congressional Responses to Judicial Decisions". Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. Gale MacMillan. pp. 400–403. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1633. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
12. ↑ Berman, Harold J. (1983). "Religious Foundations of Law in the West: An Historical Perspective". Journal of Law and Religion (Cambridge University Press) 1 (1): 3–43. doi:10.2307/1051071.
13. ↑ Fox, Jonathan; Sandler, Shmuel (1 April 2005). "Separation of Religion and State in the Twenty-First Century: Comparing the Middle East and Western Democracies". Comparative Politics 37 (3): 317. doi:10.2307/20072892.
14. ↑ Cox, Noel (2001). "Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in the Church of the Province of Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia". Deakin Law Review 6 (2): 262. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/DeakinLawRw/2001/14.html. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
15. ↑ Otto, Jan Michiel, ed (2010). Sharia incorporated: a comparative overview of the legal systems of twelve Muslim countries in past and present. Leiden University Press. ISBN 9789087280574.
16. ↑ Raisch, Marylin Johnson. "Religious Legal Systems in Comparative Law: A Guide to Introductory Research – GlobaLex". New York University School of Law. https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Religious_Legal_Systems1.html.
17. ↑ Horwitz, Morton J. (1 June 1982). "The History of the Public/Private Distinction". University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130 (6): 1423–1428. doi:10.2307/3311976. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4677. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
18. ↑ Merryman, John Henry (1968). "The Public Law-Private Law Distinction in European and American Law". Journal of Public Law 17: 3. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/emlj17&div=5. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
19. ↑ Saiman, Chaim N. (6 July 2008). "Public Law, Private Law, and Legal Science" (in en). American Journal of Comparative Law (Social Science Research Network) 56 (961): 691–702. doi:10.5131/ajcl.2007.0023. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1155203. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
20. ↑ Harlow, Carol (1 May 1980). ""Public" and "private" law: definition without distinction" (in en). The Modern Law Review 43 (3): 241–265. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1980.tb01592.x. ISSN 1468-2230.
21. ↑ Samuel, Geoffrey (1 September 1983). "Public And Private Law: A Private Lawyer's Response" (in en). The Modern Law Review 46 (5): 558–583. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1983.tb02534.x. ISSN 1468-2230.
22. ↑ Gordley, James (16 November 2006). Reimann, Mathias; Zimmermann, Reinhard. eds. "Comparative Law and Legal History" (in en). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law: 752–774. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0024. ISBN 9780199296064. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199296064-e-024. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
23. ↑ Bor, Fredric L. (1974). "The nexus between philosophy and law". Journal of Legal Education 26 (4): 539–543. ISSN 0022-2208.
24. ↑ Rubin, Paul H.. "Law and Economics". Liberty Fund, Inc.. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/LawandEconomics.html.
25. ↑ Banakar, Reza (2003). Merging law and sociology : beyond the dichotomies in socio-legal research. Berlin/Wisconsin: Galda and Wilch Publishing. ISBN 1-931255-13-X.
26. ↑ Pound, Roscoe (1914). "The End of Law as Developed in Legal Rules and Doctrines". Harvard Law Review 27 (3): 195–234. doi:10.2307/1325958. ISSN 0017-811X.
27. ↑ Sarat, Austin; Kearns, Thomas, eds (1996). Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. University of Michigan Press. pp. 18–19. doi:10.3998/mpub.10283. ISBN 9780472096251.
28. ↑ law, n. (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press, September 2005, http://oed.com/search?searchType=dictionary&q=law,+n. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
29. ↑ Rousseau, The Social Contract, Book II: Chapter 6 (Law)
30. ↑ Dennis Lloyd, Baron Lloyd of Hampstead. Introduction to Jurisprudence. Third Edition. Stevens & Sons. London. 1972. Second Impression. 1975. p. 39.
31. ↑ Mc Coubrey, Hilaire and White, Nigel D. Textbook on Jurisprudence. Second Edition. Blackstone Press Limited. 1996. ISBN 1-85431-582-X. p. 2.
32. ↑ Williams, Glanville. International Law and the Controversy Concerning the Meaning of the Word "Law". Revised version published in Laslett (Editor), Philosophy, Politics and Society (1956) p. 134 et seq. The original was published in (1945) 22 BYBIL 146.
33. ↑ Arnold 1935, p. 36.
34. ↑ Baron Lloyd of Hampstead. Introduction to Jurisprudence. Third Edition. Stevens & Sons. London. 1972. Second Impression. 1975.
35. ↑ Campbell 1993, p. 184.
36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 Bix 2022.
37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 Dworkin 1986, p. 410.
38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 Raz 1979, pp. 3–36.
39. ↑ Holmes, Oliver Wendell. "The Path of Law" (1897) 10 Harvard Law Review 457 at 461.
40. ↑ Aquinas, St Thomas. Summa Theologica. 1a2ae, 90.4. Translated by J G Dawson. Ed d'Entreves. (Basil Blackwell). Latin: "nihil est aliud qau edam rationis ordinatio ad bonum commune, ab eo qi curam communitatis habet, promulgata".
41. ↑ McCoubrey, Hilaire and White, Nigel D. Textbook on Jurisprudence. Second Edition. Blackstone Press Limited. 1996. ISBN 1-85431-582-X. p. 73.
42. ↑ Taylor, T. W. (January 1896). "The Conception of Morality in Jurisprudence". The Philosophical Review 5 (1): 36–50. doi:10.2307/2176104. https://archive.org/details/sim_philosophical-review_1896-01_5_1/page/36.
43. ↑ Fritz Berolzheimer, The World's Legal Philosophies, 115–116
44. ↑ Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 42 (par. 434)
45. ↑ Green, Leslie. "Legal Positivism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-positivism/. Retrieved 10 December 2006.
46. ↑ Nietzsche, Zur Genealogie der Moral, Second Essay, 11
47. ↑ Kazantzakis, Friedrich Nietzsche and the Philosophy of Law, 97–98
48. ↑ Linarelli, Nietzsche in Law's Cathedral, 23–26
49. ↑ Marmor, Andrei (1934). "The Pure Theory of Law". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-theory/. Retrieved 9 February 2007.
50. ↑ Bielefeldt, Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, 25–26
51. ↑ Finn 1991, pp. 170–171.
52. ↑ Bayles 1992, p. 21.
53. ↑ Raz 1979, p. 37.
54. ↑ Théodoridés. "law". Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt.
55. ↑ VerSteeg, Law in ancient Egypt
56. ↑ Lippert, Sandra (11 February 2016). "Egyptian Law, Saite to Roman Periods" (in en). Oxford Handbook Topics in Classical Studies. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.013.48. ISBN 978-0-19-993539-0. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935390-e-48. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
57. ↑ Richardson 2004, p. 11.
58. ↑ Kelly 1992, pp. 5–6.
59. ↑ Mallory 1997, p. 346.
60. ↑ Ober 1996, p. 121.
61. ↑ Kelly 1992, p. 39.
62. ↑ Stein 1999, p. 1.
63. ↑ Clarke, M. A.; Hooley, R. J. A.; Munday, R. J. C.; Sealy, L. S.; Tettenborn, A. M.; Turner, P. G. (2017). Commercial Law. Oxford University Press. p. 14. ISBN 9780199692088. https://books.google.com/books?id=hgapDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA14. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
64. ↑ 64.0 64.1 Mattei 1997, p. 71.
65. ↑ McAuliffe, Karen (21 February 2013). "Precedent at the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Linguistic Aspect". Law and Language: Current Legal Issues, Volume 15. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199673667. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673667.001.0001/acprof-9780199673667-chapter-29. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
66. ↑ For discussion of the composition and dating of these sources, see Olivelle, Manu's Code of Law, 18–25.
67. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 276.
68. ↑ Chapra, Muhammad Umer (2014) (in en). Morality and Justice in Islamic Economics and Finance. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 62–63. ISBN 9781783475728.
69. ↑ Jackson, Roy (2010). Mawlana Mawdudi and Political Islam: Authority and the Islamic State. Routledge. ISBN 9781136950360.
70. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 273.
71. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 287.
72. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 304.
73. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 305.
74. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 307.
75. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 309.
76. ↑ Farah 2006, pp. 263–304.
77. ↑ Pejovic, Caslav (2001). "Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal". Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 32 (3): 817. doi:10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5873. http://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2001/42.html. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
78. ↑ "Introduction to Civil Law Legal Systems". International Network to Promote the Rule of Law. May 2009. https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/2015/Introduction to Civil Law Legal Systems.pdf.
79. ↑ "Alphabetical Index of the 192 United Nations Member States and Corresponding Legal Systems". University of Ottawa. http://www.juriglobe.ca/eng/syst-onu/index-alpha.php.
80. ↑ "The Economist explains: What is the difference between common and civil law?". The Economist. 17 July 2013. https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2013/07/16/what-is-the-difference-between-common-and-civil-law.
81. ↑ Gordley & von Mehren 2006, p. 18.
82. ↑ Gordley & von Mehren 2006, p. 21.
83. ↑ Stein 1999, p. 32.
84. ↑ Stein 1999, p. 35.
85. ↑ Stein 1999, p. 43.
86. ↑ Hatzis 2002, pp. 253–263.
87. ↑ Demirgüç-Kunt & Levine 2001, p. 204.
88. ↑ Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, ch. 7; Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy
89. ↑ "The World Factbook – Field Listing – Legal system". Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2100.html.
90. ↑ "Magna Carta". Fordham University. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/magnacarta.html.
91. ↑ Gordley & von Mehren 2006, p. 4.
92. ↑ Gordley & von Mehren 2006, p. 3.
93. ↑ Pollock (ed) Table Talk of John Selden (1927) 43; "Equity is a roguish thing. For law we have a measure... equity is according to the conscience of him that is Chancellor, and as that is longer or narrower, so is equity. 'Tis all one as if they should make the standard for the measure a Chancellor's foot."
94. ↑ Gee v Pritchard (1818) 2 Swans. 402, 414
95. ↑ Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book the First – Chapter the First
96. ↑ Gordley & von Mehren 2006, p. 17.
97. ↑ Ferrari, Silvio (2012). "Chapter 4: Canon Law as a Religious Legal System". in Huxley, Andrew (in en). Religion, Law and Tradition: Comparative Studies in Religious Law. Routledge. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-136-13250-6. "Divine law... is eternal and cannot be changed by any human authority."
98. ↑ Glenn 2000, p. 159.
99. ↑ Boudinhon, Auguste (1910). "Canon Law". The Catholic Encyclopedia. 9. New York: Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09056a.htm. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
100. ↑ Wiesner-Hanks, Merry (2011). Gender in History: Global Perspectives. Wiley Blackwell. pp. 37.
101. ↑ Raymond Wacks, Law: A Very Short Introduction, 2nd Ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015) pg. 13.
102. ↑ Peters, Edward. "Home Page". CanonLaw.info. http://canonlaw.info.
103. ↑ Blessed John Paul II, Ap. Const. (1990). "Apostolic Constitution Sacri Canones John Paul II 1990". https://archive.org/stream/ApostolicConstitutionSacriCanonesJohnPaulIi1990/Sacri_Canones_Apostolic_Constitution_John_Paul_II_1990#page/n7/mode/2up.
104. ↑ Friedman, Lawrence M., American Law: An Introduction (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1984), pg. 70.
105. ↑ William Wirt Howe, Studies in the Civil Law, and its Relation to the Law of England and America (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1896), pg. 51.
106. ↑ A. Brundag, James (2010). he Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts. University of Chicago Press. p. 116. ISBN 978-0226077598.
107. ↑ Anderson 1956, p. 43.
108. ↑ Giannoulatos 1975, pp. 274–275.
109. ↑ Sherif 2005, pp. 157–158.
110. ↑ "Saudi Arabia". JURIST. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/world/saudiarabia.htm.
111. ↑ Akhlaghi 2005, p. 127.
112. ↑ Hallaq 2005, p. 1.
113. ↑ 113.0 113.1 Markovits 2007.
114. ↑ Quigley, J. (1989). "Socialist Law and the Civil Law Tradition". The American Journal of Comparative Law 37 (4): 781–808. doi:10.2307/840224.
115. ↑ Smith, G. B. (1988). "Socialist Legality and the Soviet Legal System". Soviet Politics. Palgrave. pp. 137–162. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-19172-7_7. ISBN 978-0-333-45919-5.
116. ↑ Edward H. Levi, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning (2013), p. 1-2.
117. ↑ Jerman v. Carlisle, 130 S.Ct. 1605, 1614, 559 U.S. 573, 587 (2010), Sotomayor, J.
118. ↑ Heise, Michael (1999). "The Importance of Being Empirical". Pepperdine Law Review 26 (4): 807–834. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1445&context=plr. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
119. ↑ Posner, Eric (2015-07-24). "The rise of statistics in law" (in en-US). http://ericposner.com/the-rise-of-statistics-in-law/.
120. ↑ Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws, Book XI: Of the Laws Which Establish Political Liberty, with Regard to the Constitution, Chapters 6–7
121. ↑ Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, XVII
122. ↑ Caldwell, Ernest (2016). "Chinese Constitutionalism: Five-Power Constitution". Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2828104. Retrieved 8 January 2020.
123. ↑ 123.0 123.1 Riker 1992, p. 101.
124. ↑ 124.0 124.1 Haggard & Shugart 2001, p. 71.
125. ↑ Olson, The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe, 7
126. ↑ Weber, Politics as a Vocation
127. ↑ Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation, 154
128. ↑ See, e.g. Tuberville v Savage (1669), 1 Mod. Rep. 3, 86 Eng. Rep. 684, where a knight said in a threatening tone to a layperson, "If it were not assize time, I would not take such language from you."
129. ↑ "History of Police Forces". History.com Encyclopedia. http://www.history.com/encyclopedia.do?articleId=219522. Retrieved 10 December 2006.
130. ↑ "Des Sergents de Ville et Gardiens de la Paix à la Police de Proximité : la Préfecture de Police au Service des Citoyens" (in fr). La Préfecture de Police de Paris. http://www.prefecture-police-paris.interieur.gouv.fr/documentation/bicentenaire/theme_expo4.htm.
131. ↑ "bureaucracy". Online Etymology Dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=bureaucracy&searchmode=none.
132. ↑ Albrow 1970, p. 16.
133. ↑ Mises, Bureaucracy, II, Bureaucratic Management
134. ↑ 134.0 134.1 Kettl 2006, p. 367.
135. ↑ Weber, Economy and Society, I, 393
136. ↑ Kettl 2006, p. 371.
137. ↑ Hazard & Dondi 2004, p. 1.
138. ↑ The Sunday Times v The United Kingdom [1979] ECHR 1 at 49 Case no. 6538/74
139. ↑ "British English: Esquire". Collins Dictionary. n.d.. http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/esquire?showCookiePolicy=true.
140. ↑ "American English: Esquire". Collins Dictionary. n.d.. http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/american/esquire?showCookiePolicy=true.
141. ↑ Ahmad 2009.
142. ↑ Hazard & Dondi 2004, pp. 22–23.
143. ↑ 143.0 143.1 Fine, The Globalisation of Legal Education, 364
144. ↑ Warren, Civil Society, 3–4
145. ↑ Locke, Second Treatise, Chap. VII, Of Political or Civil_Society. Chapter 7, section 87
146. ↑ Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, 3, II, 182
147. ↑ Karkatsoulis 2004, pp. 277–278.
148. ↑ (Pelczynski, The State and Civil Society, 1–13; Warren, Civil Society, 5–9)
149. ↑ Zaleski, Pawel (2008). "Tocqueville on Civilian Society. A Romantic Vision of the Dichotomic Structure of Social Reality". Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 50.
150. ↑ Robertson, Crimes Against Humanity, 98–99
151. ↑ Jakobs 2004, pp. 5–6.
152. ↑ Kaldor–Anheier–Glasius, Global Civil Society, passim
153. ↑ Karkatsoulis 2004, pp. 282–283.
154. ↑ Locke, The Second Treatise, Chapter 9, section 124
155. ↑ Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law, 47
156. ↑ Auby 2002, p. 75.
157. ↑ Cesare Beccaria's seminal treatise of 1763–1764 is titled On Crimes and Punishments (Dei delitti e delle pene).
158. ↑ 158.0 158.1 Brody, Acker & Logan 2001, p. 2.
159. ↑ 159.0 159.1 Wilson 2003, p. 2.
160. ↑ Dennis J. Baker, Glanville Williams Textbook of Criminal Law (London: 2012), 2
161. ↑ See e.g. Brody, Acker & Logan 2001, p. 205 about Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962).
162. ↑ See e.g. Feinman, Law 111, 260–261 about Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514 (1968).
163. ↑ Dörmann, Doswald-Beck & Kolb 2003, p. 491.
164. ↑ Kaiser 2005, p. 333.
165. ↑ About R v Dudley and Stephens [1884] 14 QBD 273 DC , see Simpson, Cannibalism and the Common Law, 212–217, 229–237
166. ↑ Pelser, Criminal Legislation, 198
167. ↑ "The States Parties to the Rome Statute". International Criminal Court. http://www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ASP/states+parties/.
168. ↑ Wehberg, Pacta Sunt Servanda, 775
169. ↑ Austotel v Franklins (1989) 16 NSWLR 582
170. ↑ 170.0 170.1 Pargendler 2018.
171. ↑ e.g. in Germany, § 311 Abs. II BGB
172. ↑ "§ 105 BGB Nichtigkeit der Willenserklärung". dejure.org. http://dejure.org/gesetze/BGB/105.html.
173. ↑ Smith, The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law, 1037
174. ↑ Lee, R. W. (April 1918). "Torts and Delicts". Yale Law Journal 27 (6): 721–730. doi:10.2307/786478. ISSN 0044-0094. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol27/iss6/1. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
175. ↑ Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850
176. ↑ Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 532, 580
177. ↑ Sturges v Bridgman (1879) 11 Ch D 852
178. ↑ e.g. concerning a British politician and the Iraq War, George Galloway v Telegraph Group Ltd [2004] EWHC 2786
179. ↑ Taff Vale Railway Co v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants [1901] AC 426
180. ↑ Harris 1994, pp. 610–627.
181. ↑ e.g. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] 2 All ER 426
182. ↑ Armory v Delamirie (1722) 93 ER 664, 1 Strange 505
183. ↑ Matthews 1995, pp. 251–274.
184. ↑ Savigny 1803, p. 25.
185. ↑ Locke 1689, Section 123.
186. ↑ Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew (1998).
187. ↑ Nestlé v National Westminster Bank plc [1993] 1 WLR 1260
188. ↑ Coase 1937, pp. 386–405.
189. ↑ Coase 1960, pp. 1–44.
190. ↑ Jakoby 2005, p. 53.
191. ↑ 191.0 191.1 Cotterrell 1992.
192. ↑ 192.0 192.1 Jary & Jary 1995, p. 636.
193. ↑ Ehrlich, Fundamental Principles, Hertogh, Living Law, Rottleuthner, La Sociologie du Droit en Allemagne, 109, Rottleuthner, Rechtstheoritische Probleme der Sociologie des Rechts, 521
194. ↑ Cotterrell 2006.
195. ↑ Rheinstein 1954, p. 336.
196. ↑ Cotterrell 1999.
197. ↑ Johnson 1995, p. 156.
198. ↑ Gurvitch & Hunt 2001, p. 142.
199. ↑ Papachristou 1999, pp. 81–82.

## Bibliography

* Ahmad, Ahmad Atif (2009). "Lawyers: Islamic Law". Oxford Encyclopedia of Legal History. Oxford University Press. http://www.macalester.edu/~ahmad/Lawyers.pdf.
* Akhlaghi, Behrooz (2005). "Iranian Commercial Law and the New Investment Law FIPPA". The Sharīʻa in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran, and Egypt. Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-148787-3.
* Albrow, Martin (1970). Bureaucracy (Key Concepts in Political Science). London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-11262-5.
* Anderson, J.N.D. (January 1956). "Law Reform in the Middle East". International Affairs 32 (1): 43–51. doi:10.2307/2607811. https://archive.org/details/sim_international-affairs_1956-01_32_1/page/42.
* Aristotle, Athenian Constitution See original text in Perseus Project .
* Arnold, Thurman W. (1935). "The Symbols of Government". American Political Science Review (New Haven: Yale University Press): 379.
* Auby, Jean-Bernard (2002). "Administrative Law in France". in Stroink, F.A.M.. Administrative Law of the European Union, its Member States and the United States. Intersentia. ISBN 978-90-5095-251-4.
* Barzilai, Gad (2003). Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities. The University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-11315-6.
* Bayles, Michael D. (1992). "A Critique of Austin". Hart's Legal Philosophy. Springer. ISBN 978-0-7923-1981-8.
* Beale, Hugh; Tallon, Denis (2002). "English Law: Consideration". Contract Law. Hart Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84113-237-2.
* Berger, Adolf (1953). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. American Philosophical Society. ISBN 978-0-87169-432-4. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_oR0LAAAAIAAJ. "Roman ars boni et aequi."
* Bergkamp, Lucas (2001). "Introduction". Liability and Environment. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-411-1645-1.
* Berle, Adolf (1932). Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, Chicago, Commerce Clearing House, Loose leaf Service division of the Corporation Trust Co.. https://archive.org/details/moderncorporatio00berl.
* Bix, Brian (2022). "John Austin". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/austin-john/. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
* Blackstone, William (1765–69). Commentaries on the Laws of England. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/blackstone_bk1ch1.asp. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
* Brody, David C.; Acker, James R.; Logan, Wayne A. (2001). "Introduction to the Study of Criminal Law". Criminal Law. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. ISBN 978-0-8342-1083-7.
* Campbell, Tom D. (1993). "The Contribution of Legal Studies". A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-0-631-19951-9.
* Churchill, Winston (1986). "Problems of War and Peace". The Hinge of Fate. Houghton Mifflin Books. ISBN 978-0-395-41058-5.
* Clarke, Paul A. B.; Linzey, Andrew (1996). Dictionary of Ethics, Theology and Society. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-06212-1.
* Coase, Ronald H. (November 1937). "The Nature of the Firm". Economica 4 (16): 386–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
* Coase, Ronald H. (October 1960). "The Problem of Social Cost (this online version excludes some parts)". Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44. doi:10.1086/466560. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9932210/becker,bergstresser,subramanian-Does_Shareholder_Proxy.pdf?sequence=1. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
* Cohen, Morris L. (1992). Law : the Art of Justice. Beaux Arts Editions. ISBN 9780883633120.
* Cotterrell, Roger (1992). The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-406-51770-8.
* Cotterrell, Roger (1999). Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain. Edinburgh University Press/ Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-1339-7.
* Cotterrell, Roger (2006). Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-2511-7.
* Curtin, Deirdre; Wessel, Ramses A. (2005). "A Survey of the Content of Good Governance for some International Organisations". Good Governance and the European Union: Reflections on Concepts, Institutions and Substance. Intersentia nv. ISBN 978-90-5095-381-8.
* Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli; Levine, Ross (2001). Financial Structures and Economic Growth. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54179-4.
* Dicey, Albert Venn (2005). "Parliamentary Sovereignty and Federalism". Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Adamant Media Corporation. ISBN 978-1-4021-8555-7.
* Dörmann, Knut; Doswald-Beck, Louise; Kolb, Robert (2003). "Appendix". Elements of War Crimes. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-81852-0.
* Durkheim, Émile (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. The Free Press reprint. ISBN 978-0-684-83638-6.
* Dworkin, Ronald (1986). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-51836-0.
* Ehrlich, Eugen (2002). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Transaction Books reprint.
* Farah, Paolo (August 2006). "Five Years of China WTO Membership. EU and US Perspectives about China's Compliance with Transparency Commitments and the Transitional Review Mechanism". Legal Issues of Economic Integration 33 (3): 263–304. doi:10.54648/LEIE2006016.
* Feinman, Jay M. (2006). "Criminal Responsibility and Criminal Law". Law 101. Oxford University Press US. ISBN 978-0-19-517957-6. https://archive.org/details/law10100fein.
* Findlay, Marc (1999). "'Independence' and the Judiciary in the PRC". in Jayasuriya, Kanishka. Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-19742-7. https://archive.org/details/lawcapitalismpow0000unse.
* Fine, Tony F. (2001). "The Globalization of Legal Education in the United States". in Drolshammer, Jens I.. The Internationalization of the Practice of Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-411-1620-8.
* Finn, John E. (1991). "Constitutional Dissolution in the Weimar Republic". Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-505738-6. https://archive.org/details/constitutionsinc00john.
* France, Anatole (1894). The Red Lily (Le lys rouge). http://www.online-literature.com/anatole-france/red-lily/. Retrieved 11 February 2007.
* Fukuyama, Francis (2005). State-Building (First edition in English 2004 ed.). Editions Livanis. ISBN 978-960-14-1159-0.
* Georgiadis, Apostolos S. (1997). "Sources of Law" (in el). General Principles of Civil Law. Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers. ISBN 978-960-232-715-9.
* Giannoulatos, Anastasios (1975). "Characteristics of Modern Islam" (in el). Islam – A General Survey. Athens: Poreuthentes.
* Glenn, H. Patrick (2000). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-876575-2. https://archive.org/details/legaltraditionso0000glen.
* Goldhaber, Michael D. (2007). "Europe's Supreme Court". A People's History of the European Court of Human Rights. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-3983-6.
* Gordley, James R.; von Mehren, Arthur Taylor (2006). An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Private Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-68185-8.
* Gurvitch, Georges; Hunt, Alan (2001). "Max Weber and Eugen Ehrlich". Sociology of Law. Athens: Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7658-0704-5.
* Haggard, Stephan; Shugart, Matthew Soberg (2001). "Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems". Presidents, Parliaments and Policy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77485-7.
* Hallaq, Wael Bahjat (2005). "Introduction". The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00580-7.
* Hamilton, Michael S., and George W. Spiro (2008). The Dynamics of Law, 4th ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. ISBN 978-0-7656-2086-6.
* Harris, Ron (September 1994). "The Bubble Act: Its Passage and Its Effects on Business Organization". The Journal of Economic History 54 (3): 610–627. doi:10.1017/S0022050700015059.
* Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
* Hatzis, Aristides N. (November 2002). "The Nature of the Firm". European Journal of Law and Economics 14 (3): 253–263. doi:10.1023/A:1020749518104.
* Hayek, Friedrich (1978). The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-32084-7.
* Hazard, Geoffrey C.; Dondi, Angelo (2004). Legal Ethics. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-4882-7.
* Hegel, Georg (1820) (in de). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm. Retrieved 9 January 2007.
* Heinze, Eric (2013). The Concept of Injustice. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-52441-4.
* Hertogh, Marc, ed (2009). Living Law: Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich. Hart. ISBN 978-1-84113-898-5.
* Hobbes, Thomas (1651). "Chapter XVII: Of the Causes, Generation, and Definition of a Commonwealth". Leviathan. http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html.
* Jakobs, Lesley A. (2004). "Retrieving Equality of Opportunity". Pursuing Equal Opportunities. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-53021-7.
* Jakoby, Stanford M. (2005). "Economic Ideas and the Labour Market – Chapter: Cycles of Economic Thought". Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 25 (1): 43–78. http://www.law.uiuc.edu/publications/cll&pj/archive/vol_25/issue_1/JacobyArticle25-1.pdf. Retrieved 12 February 2007.
* Jary, David; Jary, Julia (1995). Collins Dictionary of Sociology. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-470804-1. https://archive.org/details/collinsdictionar0000jary.
* Jensen, Eric G.; Heller, Thomas C. (2003). "Introduction". in Jensen, Eric G.. Beyond Common Knowledge. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-4803-2. https://archive.org/details/beyondc_xxx_2003_00_6114.
* Johnson, Alan (1995). The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology. Blackwells. ISBN 978-1-55786-116-0. https://archive.org/details/blackwelldiction00john.
* Kaiser, Dagmar (2005). "Leistungsstōrungen". in Staudinger, Julius von. Eckpfeiler Des Zivilrechts. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-8059-1019-4.
* Kaldor, Mary; Anheier, Helmut; Glasius, Marlies (2003). "Global Civil Society in an Era of Regressive Globalisation". in Kaldor, Mary. Global Civil Society Yearbook 2003. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926655-5.
* Kant, Immanuel (1998). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Translated by Mary Gregor). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-62695-8.
* Karkatsoulis, Panagioti (2004). "Civil Society and New Public Management" (in el). The State in Transitions. Athens: I. Sideris. ISBN 978-960-08-0333-4. http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/global/Publications/Yearbooks/2003/2003Chapter1a.pdf. Retrieved 2 September 2008.
* Kazantzakis, Nikos (1998). "Law" (in el). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Philosophy of Law and Polity. Athens: Editions Kazantzakis.
* Kelly, J.M. (1992). A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-876244-7.
* Kettl, Don (November 2006). "Public Bureaucracies". The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-927569-4. https://archive.org/details/oxfordhandbookof0000unse.
* Linarelli, John (2004). "Nietzsche in Law's Cathedral: Beyond Reason and Postmodernism – Chapter: Cycles of Economic Thought". Catholic University Law Review 53: 413–457. doi:10.2139/ssrn.421040. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ff32/9c9dcc70211171b8f31325223abd56e6f4d3.pdf.
* Locke, John (1689), "Second Treatise of Government", Two Treatises of Government
* Luban, David (2001). "Law's Blindfold". Conflict of Interest in the Professions. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512863-5.
* Mallory, J.P. (1997). "Law". Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture.
* Malloy, Robin Paul (1994). "Adam Smith and the Modern Discourse of Law and Economics". in Paul Malloy, Robin. Adam Smith and the Philosophy of Law and Economics. Springer. ISBN 978-0-7923-2796-7. https://archive.org/details/adamsmithphilos00mall.
* Markovits, I. (December 2007). "The Death of Socialist Law?". Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3: 233–253. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112849.
* Mattei, Ugo (1997). "The Distinction between Common Law and Civil Law". Comparative Law and Economics. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-06649-0.
* Matthews, Paul (1995). "The Man of Property". Medical Law Review 3 (3): 251–274. doi:10.1093/medlaw/3.3.251. PMID 11657690.
* McGhee, John (2000). Snell's Equity. London: Sweet and Maxwell. ISBN 978-0-421-85260-0.
* Mises, Ludwig von (1962). Bureaucracy. https://www.mises.org/etexts/bureaucracy.pdf. Retrieved 10 November 2006.
* Montesquieu, Baron de (1748). "Book XI: Of the Laws Which Establish Political Liberty, with Regard to the Constitution, Chapters 6–7". The Spirit of Laws (translated in English by Thomas Nugent, revised by J. V. Prichard). http://www.constitution.org/cm/sol.htm. Retrieved 14 January 2007.
* Nietzsche, Friedrich (1887). "Zweite Abhandlung: "Schuld", "schlechtes Gewissen" und Verwandtes" (in de). Zur Genealogie der Moral – Eine Streitschrift.
* Ober, Josiah (1996). "The Nature of Athenian Democracy". The Athenian Revolution: Essays on Ancient Greek Democracy and Political Theory. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00190-6.
* Olivelle, Patrick (2005). Manu's Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517146-4.
* Olson, David M.; Norton, Philip (1996). "Legislatures in Democratic Transition". The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe. Frank Cass (UK). ISBN 978-0-7146-4261-1. https://archive.org/details/newparliamentsof0000unse.
* Papachristou, T.K. (1999). "The Sociological Approach of Law" (in el). Sociology of Law. Athens: A.N. Sakkoulas Publishers. ISBN 978-960-15-0106-2.
* Pargendler, Maria (2018). "The Role of the State in Contract Law: The Common-Civil Law Divide". Yale Journal of International Law 43 (1): 143–189. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2848886. https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/campuspress.yale.edu/dist/8/1581/files/2018/02/143_The-Role-of-the-State-in-Contract-Law-2416e28.pdf. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
* Patterson, James T. (2001). Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515632-4. https://archive.org/details/brownvboardofedu00patt.
* Pelczynski, A.Z. (1984). The State and Civil Society. Cambridge University Press.
* Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1997). "Rule of Law and Constitutionalism". The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-411-0933-0.
* Rasekh, Mohammad (2005). "Are Islamism and Republicanism Compatible?". in Yassari, Nadjma. The Sharīʻa in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran, and Egypt. Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-148787-3.
* Raz, Joseph (1979). The Authority of Law, Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-825493-5.
* Redfem, Alan (2004). "Regulation of International Arbitration". Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. Sweet & Maxwell. ISBN 978-0-421-86240-1.
* Rheinstein, M. (1954). Max Weber on Law and Economy in Society. Harvard University Press.
* Richardson, W.E.J. (2004). "Introduction". Hammurabi's Laws. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-567-08158-2.
* Riker, William H. (January 1992). "The Justification of Bicameralism". International Political Science Review 13 (1): 101–116. doi:10.1177/019251219201300107.
* Robertson, Geoffrey (2006). Crimes Against Humanity. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-102463-9.
* Roeber, A. G. (October 2001). "What the Law Requires Is Written on Their Hearts: Noachic and Natural Law among German-Speakers in Early Modern North America". William and Mary Quarterly. Third Series 58 (4): 883–912. doi:10.2307/2674504.
* Rottleuthner, Hubert (December 1989). "La Sociologie du Droit en Allemagne" (in fr). Droit et Société 11: 101–120. doi:10.3406/dreso.1989.1026. http://www.reds.msh-paris.fr/publications/revue/pdf/ds11-12/ds011012-05.pdf. Retrieved 10 February 2007.
* Rottleuthner, Hubert (1984). "Rechtstheoritische Probleme der Sociologie des Rechts. Die Kontroverse zwischen Hans Kelsen und Eugen Ehrlich (1915/17)" (in de). Rechtstheorie 5: 521–551.
* Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762). "Book II: Chapter 6 (Law)" (in fr). The Social Contract (translated in English by G. D. H. Cole). https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/r/rousseau/jean_jacques/r864s/book2.html#section16. Retrieved 8 November 2007.
* Salazar, Philippe-Joseph (2019). Air Law. Juta. ISBN 9781485133148.
* Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (1803). "Zu welcher Classe von Rechten gehört der Besitz?" (in de). Das Recht des Besitzes. http://dlib-pr.mpier.mpg.de/m/kleioc/0010/exec/books/"235083". Retrieved 11 October 2008.
* Schermers, Henry G.; Blokker, Niels M. (1995). "Supervision and Sanctions". International Institutional Law. The Hague/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.
* Sealy, L.S.; Hooley, R.J.A. (2003). Commercial Law. LexisNexis Butterworths.
* Sherif, Adel Omar (2005). "Constitutions of Arab Countries and the Position of Sharia". in Yassari, Nadjma. The Sharīʻa in the Constitutions of Afghanistan, Iran, and Egypt. Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-148787-3.
* Simpson, A.W.B. (1984). Cannibalism and the Common Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-75942-5.
* Smith, Stephen A. (2003). "The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law: Is Restitution a Right or a Remedy". Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 36 (2): 1037–1062. http://llr.lls.edu/volumes/v36-issue2/smith.pdf. Retrieved 9 February 2007.
* Stein, Peter (1999). Roman Law in European History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-64372-6. https://archive.org/details/romanlaweuropean00stei.
* Stone, Julius (1965). "Early Horizons of Justice in the West". Human Law and Human Justice. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-0215-7. https://archive.org/details/humanlawhumanjus0000ston.
* Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2004). "Locke, Montesquieu the Federalist Papers". On the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-60465-9.
* Théodoridés, Aristide (1999). "law". Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. Routledge (UK). 0-415-18589-0.
* VerSteeg, Russ (2002). Law in Ancient Egypt. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-89089-978-6.
* Warren, Mark E. (1999). Civil Society and Good Governance. Washington DC: Center for the Study of Voluntary Organisations and Services, Georgetown University. https://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/wilcoxc//CivilSociety.pdf.
* Washofsky, Mark (2002). "Taking Precedent Seriously". Re-Examining Progressive Halakhah edited by Walter Jacob, Moshe Zemer. Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-57181-404-3.
* Weber, Max (1978). "Bureaucracy and Political Leadership". Economy and Society, Volume I (Translated and edited by Claus Wittich, Ephraim Fischoff, and Guenther Roth). University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-03500-3.
* Weber, Max (1919), Politics as a Vocation
* Weber, Max (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Edited with Introduction by Talcott Parsons – Translated in English by A. M. Henderson). The Free Press of Glencoe. ASIN B-000-LRHAX-2.
* Wehberg, Hans (October 1959). "Pacta Sunt Servanda". The American Journal of International Law 53 (4): 775–786. doi:10.2307/2195750.
* Wilson, William (2003). "Understanding Criminal Law". Criminal Law. Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0-582-47301-0.
* Willis, Hugh Evander (January 1926). "A Definition of Law". Virginia Law Review 12 (3): 203–214. doi:10.2307/1065717. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2248&context=facpub. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
* World Intellectual Property Organization (1997). "The System of Intellectual Property". Introduction to Intellectual Property. Kluwer Law International. ISBN 978-90-411-0938-5.
* Paolo, Silvestri (11 June 2014). "The ideal of good government in Luigi Einaudi's Thought and Life: Between Law and Freedom". https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2447898.

## Further reading

* "House of Lords Judgments". House of Lords. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldjudgmt.htm.
* Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
* "law". Law.com Dictionary. http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=1111&bold=.
* "law". Online Etymology Dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=law&searchmode=none.
* "legal". Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legal.

## External links

* DRAGNET: Search of free legal databases from New York Law School. .
* World Legal Information Institute
* Commonwealth Legal Information Institute
* Asian Legal Information Institute
* Australasian Legal Information Institute
* British and Irish Legal Information Institute
* Canadian Legal Information Institute (archived 4 October 2006)
* New Zealand Legal Information Institute
* Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute
* Southern African Legal Information Institute

* v
* t
* e

Law

Core subjects|

* Administrative law
* Civil law
* Constitutional law
* Contract
* Criminal law
* Deed
* Equity
* Evidence
* International law
* Law of obligations
* Procedure
* Civil
* Criminal
* Property law
* Public law
* Restitution
* Statutory law
* Tort

Note: This topic belongs to "Law" portal

Other subjects|

* Agricultural law
* Aviation law
* Banking law
* Bankruptcy
* Commercial law
* Competition law
* Conflict of laws
* Construction law
* Consumer protection
* Corporate law
* Cyberlaw
* Election law
* Energy law
* Entertainment law
* Environmental law
* Family law
* Financial law
* Financial regulation
* Health law
* History of the legal profession
* History of the American legal profession
* Immigration law
* Intellectual property
* International criminal law
* International human rights
* International slavery laws
* Jurimetrics
* {{{sp}}}|us||u}}r
* Law of war
* Legal archaeology
* Legal fiction
* Maritime law
* Media law
* Military law
* Probate
* Estate
* Will and testament
* Product liability
* Public international law
* Space law
* Sports law
* Tax law
* Transport law
* Trust law
* Women in law

Sources of law|

* Charter
* Code
* Constitution
* Custom
* Divine right
* Divine law
* Human rights
* Natural law
* Natural and legal rights
* Case law
* Precedent

Law making|

* Ballot measure
* Codification
* Decree
* Edict
* Executive order
* Proclamation
* Legislation
* Delegated legislation
* General executory decree
* Regulation
* Rulemaking
* Promulgation
* Repeal
* Treaty
* Concordat
* Statutory law
* Statute
* Act of Parliament
* Act of Congress (US)

Legal systems|

* Civil law
* Common law
* Chinese law
* Legal pluralism
* Religious law
* Canon law
* Hindu law
* Jain law
* Jewish law
* Sharia
* Roman law
* Socialist law
* Statutory law
* Xeer
* Yassa

Legal theory|

* Contract theory
* Critical legal studies
* Comparative law
* Feminist
* Fundamental theory of canon law
* Law and economics
* Legal formalism
* History
* International legal theory
* Principle of legality
* Rule of law
* Sociology

Jurisprudence|

* Adjudication
* Administration of justice
* Criminal justice
* Court-martial
* Dispute resolution
* Fiqh
* Lawsuit/Litigation
* Legal opinion
* Legal remedy
* Judge
* Justice of the peace
* Magistrate
* Judgment
* Judicial review
* Jurisdiction
* Jury
* Justice
* Practice of law
* Attorney
* Barrister
* Counsel
* Lawyer
* Legal representation
* Prosecutor
* Solicitor
* Question of fact
* Question of law
* Trial
* Trial advocacy
* Trier of fact
* Verdict

Legal institutions|

* Bureaucracy
* The bar
* The bench
* Civil society
* Court
* Election commission
* Executive
* Judiciary
* Law enforcement
* Legal education
* Law school
* Legislature
* Military
* Police
* Political party
* Tribunal

* Category
* Index
* Outline

Law by region

* v
* t
* e

Law of Africa

Sovereign states|

* Algeria
* Angola
* Benin
* Botswana
* Burkina Faso
* Burundi
* Cameroon
* Cape Verde (Cabo Verde)
* Central African Republic
* Chad
* Comoros
* Democratic Republic of the Congo
* Republic of the Congo
* Djibouti
* Egypt
* Equatorial Guinea
* Eritrea
* Eswatini (Swaziland)
* Ethiopia
* Gabon
* The Gambia
* Ghana
* Guinea
* Guinea-Bissau
* Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire)
* Kenya
* Lesotho
* Liberia
* Libya
* Madagascar
* Malawi
* Mali
* Mauritania
* Mauritius
* Morocco
* Mozambique
* Namibia
* Niger
* Nigeria
* Rwanda
* São Tomé and Príncipe
* Senegal
* Seychelles
* Sierra Leone
* Somalia
* South Africa
* South Sudan
* Sudan
* Tanzania
* Togo
* Tunisia
* Uganda
* Zambia
* Zimbabwe

States with limited
recognition

* Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic
* Somaliland

Dependencies and
other territories

* Canary Islands / Ceuta / Melilla (Spain)
* Madeira (Portugal)
* Mayotte / Réunion (France)
* Saint Helena / Ascension Island / Tristan da Cunha (United Kingdom)

* v
* t
* e

Law of North America

Sovereign states|

* Antigua and Barbuda
* Bahamas
* Barbados
* Belize
* Canada
* Costa Rica
* Cuba
* Dominica
* Dominican Republic
* El Salvador
* Grenada
* Guatemala
* Haiti
* Honduras
* Jamaica
* Mexico
* Nicaragua
* Panama
* Saint Kitts and Nevis
* Saint Lucia
* Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
* Trinidad and Tobago
* United States

Dependencies and
other territories

* Anguilla
* Aruba
* Bermuda
* Bonaire
* British Virgin Islands
* Cayman Islands
* Curaçao
* Greenland
* Guadeloupe
* Martinique
* Montserrat
* Puerto Rico
* Saint Barthélemy
* Saint Martin
* Saint Pierre and Miquelon
* Saba
* Sint Eustatius
* Sint Maarten
* Turks and Caicos Islands
* United States Virgin Islands

* v
* t
* e

Law of South America

Sovereign states|

* Argentina
* Bolivia
* Brazil
* Chile
* Colombia
* Ecuador
* Guyana
* Paraguay
* Peru
* Suriname
* Uruguay
* Venezuela

Dependencies and
other territories

* Falkland Islands
* French Guiana
* South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

* v
* t
* e

Law of Asia

Sovereign states|

* Afghanistan
* Armenia
* Azerbaijan
* Bahrain
* Bangladesh
* Bhutan
* Brunei
* Cambodia
* China
* Cyprus
* East Timor (Timor-Leste)
* Egypt
* Georgia
* India
* Indonesia
* Iran
* Iraq
* Israel
* Japan
* Jordan
* Kazakhstan
* North Korea
* South Korea
* Kuwait
* Kyrgyzstan
* Laos
* Lebanon
* Malaysia
* Maldives
* Mongolia
* Myanmar
* Nepal
* Oman
* Pakistan
* Philippines
* Qatar
* Russia
* Saudi Arabia
* Singapore
* Sri Lanka
* Syria
* Tajikistan
* Thailand
* Turkey
* Turkmenistan
* United Arab Emirates
* Uzbekistan
* Vietnam
* Yemen

States with
limited recognition|

* Abkhazia
* Artsakh
* Northern Cyprus
* Palestine
* South Ossetia
* Taiwan

Dependencies and
other territories|

* British Indian Ocean Territory
* Christmas Island
* Cocos (Keeling) Islands
* Hong Kong
* Macau

* Book
* Category
* Asia portal

Template:Law of Europe

Template:Oceania in topic

Links to related articles

* v
* t
* e

Humanities

* Anthropology
* Digital humanities
* History
* Law
* Literature
* Performing arts
* Politics
* Philosophy
* Religious studies
* Visual arts

* v
* t
* e

Social sciences

* Outline
* History
* Index

Primary|

* Anthropology (archaeology
* cultural
* linguistics
* social)
* Economics (microeconomics
* macroeconomics
* econometrics
* mathematical)
* Geography (human
* integrative)
* History (cultural
* economic
* military
* political
* social)
* Law (jurisprudence
* legal history
* legal systems
* public law
* private law)
* Political science (international relations
* comparative
* theory
* public policy)
* Psychology (abnormal
* cognitive
* developmental
* personality
* social)
* Sociology (criminology
* demography
* internet
* rural
* urban)

Interdisciplinary|

* Administration (business
* public)
* Anthrozoology
* Area studies
* Business studies
* Cognitive science
* Communication studies
* Community studies
* Cultural studies
* Development studies
* Education
* Environmental (social science
* studies)
* Food studies
* Gender studies
* Global studies
* History of technology
* Human ecology
* Information science
* International studies
* Linguistics
* Media studies
* [[Philosophy:Philosophy of Philosophy of science (Philosophy and economics|economics]]
* history
* psychology
* social science)
* Planning (land use
* regional
* urban)
* Political ecology
* Political economy
* Public health
* Regional science
* Science and technology studies
* Science studies (historical)
* Social work
* Vegan studies

List|

* List of social science journals

Other categorizations|

* Humanities
* Geisteswissenschaft
* Human science

* Category
* Commons
*   * Wikiversity

* v
* t
* e

Political philosophy

Terms|

* Authority
* Citizenship‎
* Duty
* Elite
* Emancipation
* Freedom
* Government
* Hegemony
* Hierarchy
* Justice
* Law
* Legitimacy
* Liberty
* Monopoly
* Nation
* Obedience
* Peace
* People
* Pluralism
* Power
* Progress
* Propaganda
* Property
* Regime
* Revolution
* Rights
* Ruling class
* Society
* Sovereignty‎
* State
* Utopia
* War

Government|

* Aristocracy
* Oligarchy
* Autocracy
* Bureaucracy
* Dictatorship
* Democracy
* Ochlocracy
* Gerontocracy
* Meritocracy
* Monarchy
* Tyranny
* Plutocracy
* Republic
* Technocracy
* Theocracy

Ideologies|

* Agrarianism
* Anarchism
* Capitalism
* Christian democracy
* Colonialism
* Communism
* Communitarianism
* Confucianism
* Conservatism
* Corporatism
* Distributism
* Environmentalism
* Fascism
* Feminism
* Feudalism
* Hindutva
* Imperialism
* Islamism
* Liberalism
* Libertarianism
* Localism
* Marxism
* Monarchism
* Multiculturalism
* Nationalism
* Nazism
* Populism
* Republicanism
* Social Darwinism
* Social democracy
* Socialism
* Third Way

Concepts|

* Balance of power
* Bellum omnium contra omnes
* Body politic
* Clash of civilizations
* Common good
* Consent of the governed
* Divine right of kings
* Family as a model for the state
* Monopoly on violence
* Natural law
* Negative and positive rights
* Night-watchman state
* Noble lie
* Noblesse oblige
* Open society
* Ordered liberty
* Original position
* Overton window
* Separation of powers
* Social contract
* State of nature
* Statolatry
* Supermajority
* Tyranny of the majority

Philosophers|

| Antiquity|

* Aristotle
* Chanakya
* Cicero
* Confucius
* Han Fei
* Lactantius
* Mencius
* Mozi
* Plato
* political philosophy
* Polybius
* Shang
* Sun Tzu
* Thucydides
* Xenophon

|

Middle Ages|

* Al-Farabi
* Aquinas
* Averroes
* Bruni
* Dante
* Gelasius
* al-Ghazali
* Ibn Khaldun
* Marsilius
* Muhammad
* Nizam al-Mulk
* Ockham
* Plethon
* Wang

Early modern
period|

* Boétie
* Bodin
* Bossuet
* Calvin
* Campanella
* Filmer
* Grotius
* Guicciardini
* Hobbes
* political philosophy
* James
* Leibniz
* Locke
* Luther
* Machiavelli
* Milton
* More
* Müntzer
* Pufendorf
* Spinoza
* Suárez

18th and 19th
centuries|

* Al-Afghani
* Bakunin
* Bastiat
* Beccaria
* Bentham
* Bolingbroke
* Bonald
* Burke
* Carlyle
* Comte
* Condorcet
* Constant
* Cortés
* Engels
* Fichte
* Fourier
* Franklin
* Godwin
* Haller
* Hegel
* Herder
* Hume
* Iqbal
* Jefferson
* Kant
* political philosophy
* Le Bon
* Le Play
* Madison
* Maistre
* Marx
* Mazzini
* Mill
* Montesquieu
* Nietzsche
* Owen
* Paine
* Renan
* Rousseau
* Sade
* Saint-Simon
* Smith
* Spencer
* de Staël
* Stirner
* Taine
* Thoreau
* Tocqueville
* Tucker
* Voltaire

20th and 21st
centuries|

* Agamben
* Ambedkar
* Apo
* Arendt
* Aron
* Badiou
* Bauman
* Benoist
* Berlin
* Bernstein
* Burnham
* Chomsky
* Dmowski
* Du Bois
* Dugin
* Dworkin
* Evola
* Fanon
* Fisher
* Foucault
* Fromm
* Fukuyama
* Gandhi
* Gentile
* Gramsci
* Guénon
* Habermas
* Hayek
* Hoppe
* Huntington
* Kautsky
* Khomeini
* Kirk
* Kropotkin
* Laclau
* Lenin
* Luxemburg
* Mansfield
* Mao
* Marcuse
* Maurras
* Michels
* Mises
* Mosca
* Mouffe
* Negri
* Nozick
* Nursi
* Nussbaum
* Oakeshott
* Ortega
* Pareto
* Popper
* Qutb
* Rand
* Rawls
* Röpke
* Rothbard
* Russell
* Sartre
* Savarkar
* Schmitt
* Scruton
* Shariati
* Sorel
* Spann
* Spengler
* Strauss
* Sun
* Taylor
* Voegelin
* Walzer
* Weber

Works|

* Republic (c.375 BCE)
* Politics (c.350 BCE)
* Analects of Confucius (c.475 BCE-1279 CE)
* On the Republic (51 BCE)
* Siyasatnama (11th century)
* Treatise on Law (c. 1274)
* Monarchy (1313)
* Muqaddimah (1337)
* The Prince (1532)
* Leviathan (1651)
* Two Treatises of Government (1689)
* The Spirit of Law (1748)
* The Social Contract (1762)
* Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)
* Rights of Man (1791)
* Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1820)
* Democracy in America (1835–1840)
* The Communist Manifesto (1848)
* On Liberty (1859)
* The Revolt of the Masses (1929)
* The Road to Serfdom (1944)
* The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)
* The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951)
* The Wretched of the Earth (1961)
* A Theory of Justice (1971)
* The End of History and the Last Man (1992)

Related|

* Authoritarianism
* Collectivism and individualism
* Conflict theories
* Contractualism
* Critique of political economy
* Egalitarianism
* Elite theory
* Elitism
* History of political thought
* Institutional discrimination
* Jurisprudence
* Justification for the state
* Political ethics
* Political spectrum
* Left-wing politics
* Centrism
* Right-wing politics
* Religion in politics
* Christianity
* Islam
* Judaism
* Secular state
* Separation of church and state
* State atheism
* Political violence
* Separatism
* Social justice
* Statism
* Totalitarianism

* Category:Political philosophy

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Law&oldid=4353515"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template