Oakland Unified School District, California

Oakland Unified School District

Oakland, California
District details
Superintendent: Kyla Johnson-Trammell
# of school board members: 7
Website: Link

Oakland Unified School District is a school district in California.

Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...

* Superintendent
* School board
* Elections
* Budget
* Teacher salaries
* Academic performance
* Student enrollment
* Demographics
* Contact information

## Contents

* 1 Superintendent
* 1.1 Past superintendents
* 2 School board elections
* 2.1 Election dates
* 2.2 Public participation in board meetings
* 3 Budget
* 3.1 Revenue
* 3.2 Expenditures
* 3.3 Debt
* 4 Teacher salaries
* 5 Academic performance
* 5.1 Proficiency assessments
* 5.1.1 Mathematics
* 5.1.2 Reading/language arts
* 5.2 Graduation rates
* 6 Student enrollment
* 7 About the district
* 8 Noteworthy events
* 8.1 2020: Recall effort
* 8.2 2017: Superintendent announces plan to leave
* 8.3 2016: CCSA and OUSD agree to stay Proposition 39 lawsuit
* 8.4 2016: School lacks accreditation
* 8.5 2016: Oakland Unified charter schools listed in ACLU discrimination report
* 8.6 2016: Grand jury report calls for better management of district's charter schools
* 9 Contact information
* 10 See also
* 11 External links
* 12 Footnotes

## Superintendent[edit]

|  This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates.

|

Kyla Johnson-Trammell is the superintendent of the Oakland Unified School District. Johnson-Trammell was appointed superintendent in 2017.[1] Johnson-Trammell's previous career experience includes working as an elementary school teacher, elementary school principal, and director of talent development.[2]

### Past superintendents[edit]

* Devin Dillon was the interim superintendent of the Oakland Unified School District in 2017. Dillon's previous career experience included working as the district's chief academic officer.[3][4]
* Antwan Wilson was the superintendent of the Oakland Unified School District from 2014 to 2017. Wilson's previous career experience included working as the assistant superintendent for post-secondary readiness of Denver Public Schools, a middle school and high school teacher, and a middle school and high school principal.[3][5]
* Gary Yee was the superintendent of the Oakland Unified School District from 2013 to 2014. Yee's previous career experience included working as the vice chancellor of the Peralta Community College District and dean of instruction at Merritt College.[6]

## School board elections[edit]

The Oakland Unified School District school board consists of seven members elected by districtOnly the registered voters of a particular area may vote for a particular seat in a by-district election. This is opposed to an "at-large" election, in which all registered voters can vote for seats on the ballot regardless of geographic location. to four-year terms.[7]

Office

| Name | Date assumed office

|
|

Oakland Unified Board of Education District 1 | Sam Davis | December 11, 2020 | Oakland Unified Board of Education District 2 | Aimee Eng | 2014 | Oakland Unified Board of Education District 3 | VanCedric Williams | December 11, 2020 | Oakland Unified Board of Education District 4 | Gary Yee | January 1, 2019 | Oakland Unified Board of Education District 5 | Mike Hutchinson | December 11, 2020 | Oakland Unified Board of Education District 6 | Shanthi R. Gonzales | 2014 | Oakland Unified Board of Education District 7 | Clifford Thompson | December 11, 2020

|  This officeholder information was last updated on July 16, 2021. Please contact us with any updates. |

|
|

### Election dates[edit]

See also: Oakland Unified School District elections in 2014, 2016, 2018, & 2020

Members of the Oakland Unified School District school board are elected to four-year terms. Three or four seats are up for election on a staggered basis every even-numbered year in November.

A general election was scheduled for November 3, 2020.

### Public participation in board meetings[edit]

The Oakland Unified School District school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[8]

Public Participation

Members of the public are encouraged to attend Board meetings and to address the Board concerning any item on the agenda or, at regular meetings, a matter within the Board's jurisdiction. So as not to inhibit public participation, persons attending Board meetings shall not be requested to sign in, complete a questionnaire, or otherwise provide their name or other information as a condition of attending the meeting.

In order to conduct district business in an orderly and efficient manner, the Board requires that public presentations to the Board comply with the following procedures:

1\. The Board shall give members of the public an opportunity to address the Board either before or during the Board's consideration of each item of business regular or special meetings. (Education Code 35145.5, Government Code 54954.3) Public comment on non-voting special orders and reports will generally be taken in one 20 minute block following all presentations of special orders and reports. Public comment will be taken on each item of new or unfinished business prior to the Board's vote on any such item.

2\. At regular meetings of the Board, the board shall reserve up to 20 minutes on each agenda for the president of each of the District's bargaining units, or his or her designee, to address the Board on behalf of the unit regarding any item of business on the agenda or not on the agenda. Each bargaining unit shall be provided up to 5 minutes, at the discretion of the Board present.

3\. At a time so designated on the agenda, members of the public may bring before the Board, at a regular meeting, matters that are not listed on the agenda. The Board may refer such a matter to the Superintendent or designee or take it under advisement, but shall not take action at that time except as allowed by law. The matter may be placed on the agenda of a subsequent meeting for action or discussion by the Board. (Education Code 35145.5, Government Code 54954.2)

4\. Without taking action, Board members or district staff members may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by the public about items not appearing on the agenda. Additionally, on their own initiative or in response to questions posed by the public, a Board or staff member may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his/her own activities. (Government Code 54954.2)

Furthermore, the Board or a Board member may provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, ask staff to report back to the Board at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter, or take action directing staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (Government Code 54954.2)

5\. The Board need not allow the public to speak on any item that has already been considered by a committee composed exclusively of Board members at a public meeting where the public had the opportunity to address the committee on that item. However, if the Board determines that the item has been substantially changed since the committee heard it, the Board shall provide an opportunity for the public to speak. (Government Code 54954.3)

(cf. 9130 - Board Committees)

6\. A person wishing to be heard by the Board shall first be recognized by the president and shall then proceed to comment as briefly as the subject permits.

Individual speakers shall be allowed up to three minutes to address the Board. With Board consent, the president may increase or decrease the time allowed for public presentation, depending on the topic and the number of persons wishing to be heard. The president may take a poll of speakers for or against a particular issue and may ask that additional persons speak only if they have something new to add.

7\. The Board president may rule on the appropriateness of a topic. If the topic would be more suitably addressed at a later time, the president may indicate the time and place when it should be presented.

The Board shall not prohibit public criticism of its policies, procedures, programs, services, acts or omissions. (Government Code 54954.3) In addition, the Board may not prohibit public criticism of district employees.

8\. The Board president shall not permit any disturbance or willful interruption of Board meetings. Persistent disruption by an individual or group shall be grounds for the chair to terminate the privilege of addressing the Board. The Board may remove disruptive individuals and order the room cleared if necessary; in this case, members of the media not participating in the disturbance shall be allowed to remain, and individual(s) not participating in such disturbances may be allowed to remain at the discretion of the Board. When the room is ordered cleared due to a disturbance, further Board proceedings shall concern only matters appearing on the agenda. (Government Code 54957.9)

## Budget[edit]

From 1993 to 2013, the Oakland Unified School District had an average of $469,602,000 in revenue and $489,323,048 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $362,058,095 in outstanding debt. The district retired $25,506,762 of its debt and issued $56,765,571 in new debt each year on average.[9]

### Revenue[edit]

The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.

Revenue by Source

Fiscal
Year | Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total
Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue
Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years.

1993| $52,696,000| 18.17%| $206,853,000| 71.34%| $30,421,000| 10.49%| $289,970,000
1994| $79,759,000| 25.78%| $196,888,000| 63.64%| $32,720,000| 10.58%| $309,367,000
1995| $85,563,000| 28.58%| $181,601,000| 60.65%| $32,262,000| 10.77%| $299,426,000
1996| $87,370,000| 27.92%| $195,244,000| 62.40%| $30,269,000| 9.67%| $312,883,000
1997| $110,845,000| 27.38%| $260,353,000| 64.30%| $33,680,000| 8.32%| $404,878,000
1998| $111,102,000| 26.63%| $270,498,000| 64.83%| $35,671,000| 8.55%| $417,271,000
1999| $109,680,000| 27.81%| $242,817,000| 61.56%| $41,919,000| 10.63%| $394,416,000
2000| $119,715,000| 25.87%| $290,968,000| 62.87%| $52,094,000| 11.26%| $462,777,000
2001| $145,074,000| 29.50%| $295,107,000| 60.02%| $51,521,000| 10.48%| $491,702,000
2002| $143,454,000| 28.37%| $304,484,000| 60.21%| $57,775,000| 11.42%| $505,713,000
2003| $150,026,000| 28.00%| $325,488,000| 60.75%| $60,308,000| 11.26%| $535,822,000
2004| $167,031,000| 33.67%| $252,241,000| 50.85%| $76,751,000| 15.47%| $496,023,000
2005| $141,612,000| 27.79%| $284,157,000| 55.76%| $83,819,000| 16.45%| $509,588,000
2006| $162,844,000| 29.92%| $303,382,000| 55.73%| $78,128,000| 14.35%| $544,354,000
2007| $156,077,000| 28.82%| $307,646,000| 56.81%| $77,855,000| 14.38%| $541,578,000
2008| $170,062,000| 29.73%| $324,775,000| 56.78%| $77,187,000| 13.49%| $572,024,000
2009| $161,647,000| 29.25%| $297,500,000| 53.84%| $93,453,000| 16.91%| $552,600,000 | 2010| $172,976,000| 33.47%| $254,985,000| 49.34%| $88,869,000| 17.20%| $516,830,000

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2011| $172,576,000| 31.74%| $283,262,000| 52.09%| $87,951,000| 16.17%| $543,789,000
2012| $183,055,000| 32.89%| $289,622,000| 52.03%| $83,946,000| 15.08%| $556,623,000
2013| $204,198,000| 33.81%| $325,280,000| 53.85%| $74,530,000| 12.34%| $604,008,000
Avg.| $137,493,429| 28.81%| $271,102,429| 58.55%| $61,006,143| 12.63%| $469,602,000

### Expenditures[edit]

The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:

* Instruction: operation expenditures, state payments on behalf of the district for instruction and benefits, and retirement system transfers
* Support Services: support services, food services, and retirement system transfers for support service staff
* Capital Spending: capital outlay expenditures (i.e., construction, land or facilities purchases, and equipment purchases)
* Debt & Gov. Payments: payments to state and local governments and interest on school system debt
* Other: all other non-K-12 programs, except food services

Expenditures by Category

Fiscal
Year | Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget
Total
Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget

Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years.

1993| $165,741,000| 56.69%| $104,402,000| 35.71%| $11,390,000| 3.90%| $2,564,000| 0.88%| $8,256,000| 2.82%| $292,353,000
1994| $162,656,000| 53.25%| $116,110,000| 38.02%| $11,077,000| 3.63%| $2,504,000| 0.82%| $13,083,000| 4.28%| $305,430,000
1995| $165,632,000| 54.51%| $113,547,000| 37.37%| $10,231,000| 3.37%| $3,597,000| 1.18%| $10,843,000| 3.57%| $303,850,000
1996| $172,973,000| 55.06%| $113,547,000| 36.15%| $10,869,000| 3.46%| $4,800,000| 1.53%| $11,940,000| 3.80%| $314,129,000
1997| $170,083,000| 53.12%| $119,140,000| 37.21%| $19,514,000| 6.10%| $1,227,000| 0.38%| $10,197,000| 3.18%| $320,161,000
1998| $199,727,000| 47.57%| $127,836,000| 30.45%| $78,106,000| 18.60%| $3,183,000| 0.76%| $11,021,000| 2.62%| $419,873,000
1999| $209,344,000| 52.52%| $131,869,000| 33.08%| $42,381,000| 10.63%| $3,704,000| 0.93%| $11,327,000| 2.84%| $398,625,000
2000| $249,448,000| 49.54%| $135,259,000| 26.86%| $101,583,000| 20.17%| $4,600,000| 0.91%| $12,636,000| 2.51%| $503,526,000
2001| $284,428,000| 52.79%| $150,537,000| 27.94%| $84,957,000| 15.77%| $5,618,000| 1.04%| $13,255,000| 2.46%| $538,795,000
2002| $276,068,000| 46.79%| $204,380,000| 34.64%| $66,759,000| 11.31%| $9,770,000| 1.66%| $33,054,000| 5.60%| $590,031,000
2003| $270,505,000| 47.34%| $185,819,000| 32.52%| $61,222,000| 10.71%| $15,868,000| 2.78%| $38,029,000| 6.65%| $571,443,000
2004| $251,806,000| 48.18%| $168,716,000| 32.28%| $40,794,000| 7.81%| $16,173,000| 3.09%| $45,108,000| 8.63%| $522,597,000
2005| $248,786,000| 46.43%| $173,380,000| 32.36%| $54,604,000| 10.19%| $16,378,000| 3.06%| $42,630,000| 7.96%| $535,778,000
2006| $236,879,000| 41.22%| $180,561,000| 31.42%| $90,512,000| 15.75%| $20,819,000| 3.62%| $45,926,000| 7.99%| $574,697,000
2007| $246,596,000| 44.91%| $191,441,000| 34.86%| $46,098,000| 8.39%| $26,676,000| 4.86%| $38,328,000| 6.98%| $549,139,000
2008| $250,690,000| 41.15%| $215,290,000| 35.34%| $61,638,000| 10.12%| $43,564,000| 7.15%| $38,079,000| 6.25%| $609,261,000
2009| $239,706,000| 40.16%| $208,953,000| 35.00%| $80,994,000| 13.57%| $29,077,000| 4.87%| $38,212,000| 6.40%| $596,942,000  | 2010| $245,944,000| 42.99%| $195,763,000| 34.22%| $63,706,000| 11.14%| $32,105,000| 5.61%| $34,572,000| 6.04%| $572,090,000

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2011| $225,659,000| 39.60%| $200,196,000| 35.13%| $76,914,000| 13.50%| $39,757,000| 6.98%| $27,335,000| 4.80%| $569,861,000
2012| $240,145,000| 40.56%| $190,617,000| 32.19%| $101,940,000| 17.22%| $39,344,000| 6.65%| $20,025,000| 3.38%| $592,071,000
2013| $243,203,000| 40.87%| $194,872,000| 32.74%| $96,401,000| 16.20%| $41,454,000| 6.97%| $19,202,000| 3.23%| $595,132,000
Avg.| $226,477,095| 47.39%| $162,963,571| 33.59%| $57,699,524| 11.02%| $17,275,333| 3.13%| $24,907,524| 4.86%| $489,323,048

### Debt

The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.

Debt

Fiscal
Year | Retired | Issued | Outstanding | Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | 1993| $1,755,000| $0| $14,035,000

|
|
|

1994| $1,755,000| $0| $12,280,000
1995| $1,755,000| $30,516,000| $41,041,000
1996| $1,755,000| $0| $39,286,000
1997| $2,201,000| $0| $37,085,000
1998| $31,993,000| $51,961,000| $83,229,000
1999| $31,284,000| $47,325,000| $112,514,000
2000| $8,164,000| $87,565,000| $191,915,000
2001| $6,102,000| $100,215,000| $286,028,000
2002| $26,002,000| $104,690,000| $364,716,000
2003| $25,356,000| $0| $339,360,000
2004| $8,530,000| $0| $346,961,000
2005| $9,109,000| $0| $337,938,000
2006| $7,457,000| $141,000,000| $485,661,000
2007| $8,212,000| $130,000,000| $601,308,000
2008| $266,770,000| $258,805,000| $642,866,000
2009| $23,751,000| $0| $559,554,000 | 2010| $10,614,000| $185,000,000| $733,941,000

|
|
|

2011| $23,121,000| $0| $755,622,000
2012| $18,139,000| $55,000,000| $819,853,000
2013| $21,817,000| $0| $798,027,000
Avg.| $25,506,762| $56,765,571| $362,058,095

## Teacher salaries[edit]

The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.

Year  |  Minimum  |  Maximum

|
|

2021[10] |  $57,096  |  $102,646
2019[11] |  $52,764  |  $94,859

## Academic performance[edit]

### Proficiency assessments[edit]

Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[12]

#### Mathematics[edit]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[13]

School year  |  All (%)  |  Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)  |  Black (%)  |  Hispanic (%)  |  Native
American (%)  |  Two or More
Races (%)  |  White (%)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2018-2019 |  27 |  45  |  12  |  16  |  11-19  |  55  |  65
2017-2018 |  27 |  45  |  12  |  17  |  20-29  |  54  |  63
2016-2017 |  28 |  51  |  13  |  19  |  20-24  |  50  |  60
2015-2016 |  24 |  43  |  10  |  14  |  ≤10  |  53  |  62
2014-2015 |  23 |  42  |  10  |  14  |  10-14  |  53  |  62
2013-2014 |  45 |  70  |  33  |  37  |  PS  |  40-49  |  75-79
2012-2013 |  46 |  69  |  29  |  39  |  35-39  |  71  |  79
2011-2012 |  51 |  74  |  36  |  47  |  50-54  |  66  |  78
2010-2011 |  52 |  73  |  38  |  50  |  35-39  |  61  |  80

#### Reading/language arts[edit]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[13]

School year  |  All (%)  |  Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)  |  Black (%)  |  Hispanic (%)  |  Native
American (%)  |  Two or More
Races (%)  |  White (%)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2018-2019 |  33 |  47  |  19  |  24  |  11-19  |  61  |  72
2017-2018 |  33 |  46  |  19  |  24  |  20-29  |  60  |  71
2016-2017 |  35 |  50  |  21  |  28  |  35-39  |  59  |  68
2015-2016 |  30 |  45  |  17  |  21  |  30-39  |  61  |  68
2014-2015 |  29 |  46  |  16  |  19  |  20-24  |  58  |  67
2013-2014 |  44 |  58  |  36  |  34  |  PS  |  50-59  |  80-84
2012-2013 |  44 |  60  |  33  |  34  |  45-49  |  75  |  81
2011-2012 |  48 |  64  |  39  |  41  |  45-49  |  68  |  81
2010-2011 |  47 |  63  |  38  |  40  |  40-44  |  61  |  83

### Graduation rates[edit]

The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[13][14]

School year  |  All (%)  |  Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)  |  Black (%)  |  Hispanic (%)  |  Native
American (%)  |  Two or More
Races (%)  |  White (%)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2017-2018 |  73 |  88  |  75  |  65  |  ≥50  |  65-69  |  80-84
2016-2017 |  70 |  80  |  71  |  64  |  ≥50  |  80-84  |  75-79
2015-2016 |  65 |  74  |  64  |  59  |  <50  |  70-79  |  75-79
2014-2015 |  63 |  78  |  61  |  56  |  40-59  |  70-79  |  75-79
2013-2014 |  60 |  71  |  57  |  54  |  ≥50  |  60-69  |  70-74
2012-2013 |  63 |  74  |  57  |  59  |  <50  |  40-49  |  75-79
2011-2012 |  59 |  77  |  53  |  52  |  40-59  |  40-49  |  75-79
2010-2011 |  59 |  75  |  55  |  52  |  <50  |  50-59  |  70-74

## Student enrollment[edit]

Year[15] |  Enrollment  |  Year-to-year change (%)

|
|

2018-2019  |  36,373  |  -27.4
2017-2018  |  50,090  |  0.9
2016-2017  |  49,621  |  1.4
2015-2016  |  48,949  |  2.1
2014-2015  |  47,940  |  1.9
2013-2014  |  47,028  |  1.6
2012-2013  |  46,298  |  0.2
2011-2012  |  46,193  |  -0.5
2010-2011  |  46,428  |  0.7
2009-2010  |  46,099  |  -0.9
2008-2009  |  46,516  |  5.5
2007-2008  |  44,084  |  -6.2
2006-2007  |  47,013  |  -2.3
2005-2006  |  48,135  |  -2.2
2004-2005  |  49,214  |  -2.4
2003-2004  |  50,437  |  -3.9
2002-2003  |  52,501  |  -1.9
2001-2002  |  53,545  |  -2.4
2000-2001  |  54,863  |  -0.3
1999-2000  |  55,051  |  1.5
1998-1999  |  54,256  |  1.3
1997-1998  |  53,564  |  0.2
1996-1997  |  53,462  |  1.9
1995-1996  |  52,452  |  1.4
1994-1995  |  51,706  |  -0.1
1993-1994  |  51,748  |  1.0
1992-1993  |  51,234  |  -0.9
1991-1992  |  51,698  |  -0.8
1990-1991  |  52,095  |  2.7
1989-1990  |  50,741  |  -0.9
1988-1989  |  51,218  |  -0.2
1987-1988  |  51,298  |  -0.6
1986-1987  |  51,622  |  \-

## About the district[edit]

Oakland Unified School District is located in Alameda County, California.

Oakland Unified School District is located in Alameda County, California. It is classified as a large city school district by the National Center for Education Statistics. The district served 36,373 students during the 2018-2019 school year and comprised 91 schools.[16]

During the 2018-2019 school year, 73.4% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 33.0% were English language learners, and 16.0% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP)An IEP is a specific education plan that is tailored to the needs of a student with a disability. It describes how the student learns most effectively, formulates goals for the student and considers their ability in relation to general curriculum..[17]

Racial Demographics, 2018-2019

Race  |  Oakland Unified School District (%)  |  California K-12 students (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native  |  N/A  |  0.5
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander  |  13.8  |  11.7
Black  |  24.4  |  5.4
Hispanic  |  42.3  |  54.6
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander  |  1.1  |  0.5
Two or More Races  |  6.6  |  4.5
White  |  11.6  |  22.9

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

## Noteworthy events[edit]

### 2020: Recall effort[edit]

* 2020: Recall effort (click to expand)

See also: Jody London recall, Oakland Unified School District, California (2020)

An effort to recall acting president and District 1 representative Jody London from the Oakland Unified School District school board did not go to a vote in 2020. During a school board meeting on December 10, 2019, London was served with a notice of intent to recall her from her position.[18] Those calling for her removal had to collect 9,236 signatures in order to get the recall election on the ballot. They did not submit signatures in time to hold an election six months before her term was due to end.[19][20][21]

The board voted in September 2019 to close Kaiser Elementary School and merge it at the end of the 2019-2020 school year with the Sankofa Elementary School. Kaiser Elementary School was in London's District 1. The school closure and proposed merger sparked protestors to initiate the recall campaign against London, who announced in 2018 that she did not plan to seek re-election in 2020.[22]

London argued that the student body of Kaiser Elementary was diverse and comprised of students from all parts of Oakland. She also argued the district could increase the quality of its schools by focusing resources on fewer facilities. London also said she did not believe enough signatures would be gathered to mount the recall.[22]

Protestors argued that school closures hurt students and demanded the halt of school closures until the summer of 2022 when voters would have the opportunity to vote on statewide ballot measures that could increase education funding.[22]

### 2017: Superintendent announces plan to leave[edit]

* 2017: Superintendent announces plan to leave (click to expand)

Oakland Unified Superintendent Antwan Wilson announced he would be leaving his position in February 2017 in order to become chancellor of schools in Washington, D.C. The board appointed Devin Dillon, the district's chief academic officer, to serve as interim superintendent.[3]

“I come to this work having worked at every level of the school system, starting out as an instructional assistant in college and my favorite role of being a teacher,” said Dillon. “I still consider myself a teacher first. We need to continue our focus on equity and ensuring that every student thrives.”[3]

Wilson was the district's eighth superintendent in 16 years. His time with the district ended six months before his three-year contract was up.[3]

### 2016: CCSA and OUSD agree to stay Proposition 39 lawsuit[edit]

* 2016: CCSA and OUSD agree to stay Proposition 39 lawsuit (click to expand)

In September 2016, the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) agreed to stay a lawsuit it had filed against the Oakland Unified School District after the district offered to work on its process of sharing facilities with its charter schools. CCSA filed the lawsuit in March 2016 in order to require the district to align with Proposition 39, a law that was passed in 2000 to ensure that public school facilities were shared equitably among all public school students, including public charter school students.[23][24]

Under Proposition 39, the Oakland Unified School District was required to provide school space where the charter school wanted to be located—somewhere reasonably equivalent to the places other district students attend school. The district was also required to locate all of the classrooms for the charter school at one site. In its lawsuit, CCSA said the district had violated these laws for a number of years by offering charter schools split sites, not offering equivalent space, and not making a reasonable effort to offer a site in a desired location. The lawsuit also said the district's Proposition 39 process had lacked transparency and had used confusing language to "make charter schools inadvertently waive their Prop. 39 rights."[23]

"The illegal Prop. 39 tactics by OUSD create insurmountable barriers and we felt we had no alternative but to take action on behalf of Oakland students and families. CCSA has corresponded extensively with OUSD, putting it on detailed notice of its extensive violations of the law," said CCSA President and CEO Jed Wallace when the lawsuit was filed.[23]

The agreement to stay the lawsuit was reached six months after the lawsuit was filed. CCSA agreed to put the case on hold until the district issued its Proposition 39 facilities offers for the 2017-2018 school year. The district agreed to work with CCSA to provide a more transparent Proposition 39 process.[24]

### 2016: School lacks accreditation[edit]

* 2016: School lacks accreditation (click to expand)

Oakland Unified School District officials announced that they failed to meet a deadline to obtain accreditation for a new high school on September 27, 2016. Madison Park Business & Art Academy—a public elementary and middle school that was expanded to include grades nine through 12 for the first time that year—had not been accredited with the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, making it harder for the 75 seniors set to graduate to get into a University of California or California State University school.[25]

In reaction to the announcement of the school lacking accreditation, students at Madison Park staged a walkout on September 28, 2016, demanding to know how the lack of accreditation would affect their chances of getting into a university. The district responded by holding an impromptu town hall meeting to answer questions.[26]

District spokesman John Sasaki said the accreditation process for the school had “dropped between the cracks” due to the school's newness and the district's staff turnover. He said students who planned to attend a community college, a private college, or an out-of-state college would not be affected. “Obviously this is not what we want to have our students dealing with,” said Sasaki.[25]

Certifying a school with the Western Association of Schools and Colleges proves that the school's courses are state-approved and allows admissions officers at universities to use students' grades and the courses they took in high school to determine their eligibility. Without that accreditation, the admissions process relies on test scores or "a demonstration of exceptional circumstances that merit admission despite the lack of traditional qualifications," according to SF Gate.[25] Sasaki, however, said, "We have been assured by the UC system that it should not adversely affect these students.”[26]

The Western Association of Schools and Colleges voted on Madison Park’s accreditation application in December 2016, but the district announced that it had received early word that the school would receive full accreditation in October 2016. College applications for California university systems were due in November 2016.[25][27]

In response to the mistake, Oakland Unified officials hired an accreditation coordinator and pledged to send a college and career readiness counselor to Madison Park twice per week. The district also promised to sponsor a college admissions course and gave the school $10,000 for activities such as college campus tours. Officials said no other schools in the district lacked accreditation.[25]

### 2016: Oakland Unified charter schools listed in ACLU discrimination report[edit]

* 2016: Oakland Unified charter schools listed in ACLU discrimination report (click to expand)

Eleven of the Oakland Unified School District's 37 charter schools were alleged to have discriminatory admissions practices in an August 2016 report released by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Southern California and Public Advocates. Researchers with the ACLU and Public Advocates said they started investigating admission policies after hearing from parents that some charter schools were not accepting all students as they were required to do by state law. The 11 Oakland Unified schools were included in a list of 253 charter schools flagged for discriminatory practices across California.[28][29]

The 11 Oakland Unified charter schools included in the report were:[29][30]

* American Indian Public Charter
* ARISE High
* Downtown Charter Academy
* East Oakland Leadership Academy

* Francophone Charter School of Oakland
* North Oakland Community Charter
* Oakland Charter Academy
* Oakland Charter High School

* Oakland Military Institute, College Preparatory Academy
* Oakland School for the Arts
* Oakland Unity High

|
|

Before the 2016 election, two of the schools—ARISE High and the North Oakland Community Charter—were removed from the list after they adjusted their admissions policies.[29]

The ACLU report grouped the discriminatory admissions practices into five categories:

“  |
* Exclusion Based on Academic Performance
* Discrimination against English Learners
* Pre-Enrollment Essays or Interviews
* Illegal Parent/Guardian Volunteer Requirements
* Requirements that Discourage Undocumented Students[29][31]
|  ”

|
|

Schools could be put into multiple categories if researchers found multiple types of discriminatory practices. Oakland Unified's charter schools were nearly equally split between requiring essays or interviews and rejecting the applications of students who were in the U.S. illegally, but two schools were found to have mandates for parents. No schools in Oakland Unified were found to have bias against English language learners.[29]

In response to the report, the California Charter Schools Association encouraged its members to review their school policies and to revise them if needed.[28]

### 2016: Grand jury report calls for better management of district's charter schools[edit]

* 2016: Grand jury report calls for better management of district's charter schools (click to expand)

An Alameda County grand jury report released in June 2016 recommended that the Oakland Unified School District add more oversight and accountability to its charter school approval and reauthorization process in response to how the district's charter schools had performed on state assessments. The report also recommended that the district increase fiscal and governance oversight for its charter schools through a larger staff at its office of charter schools and through additional site visits.[32]

The grand jury report showed that Oakland Unified's charter schools had on average scored lower on the 2015 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress than the district's regular public schools. The report showed that 15 of the district's 37 charter schools had performed below the district's average in both math and reading. A total of 19 charter schools scored below the district's math average, and 17 scored below the district's reading average.[32]

More of the district's charter schools fell below the state's average. A total of 23 performed below the state's average in math, and 24 performed below the state's average in reading.[32]

Though the report acknowledged that additional measures should be used along with state assessment scores, it also stated that “it’s a concern that some charters are not achieving expected results and yet may still be reauthorized.”[32]

“The district remains committed to ensuring all students have access to a high-quality education and will continue our important work toward equity in our schools,” said Valerie Goode, a spokeswoman for the district. She said the district follows the state education code when reviewing charter school applications.[32]

The California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) announced its disagreement with the report. “We find the report lacking understanding of the depth and nuance in both law and practice of charter schools across California. Furthermore, the report is oversimplified in both its definition of the issues and recommended solutions,” said CCSA spokeswoman Emily Bertelli.[32]

Oakland Unified had the largest number of charter schools in Alameda County in 2016. At the time the report was released, almost 25 percent of the district's schools were charters, compared to the average of 6% nationwide.[32]

## Contact information[edit]

Oakland Unified School District
1000 Broadway
Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94607
Phone: 510-879-8000

## See also[edit]

California | School Board Elections | News and Analysis

|
|

* List of school districts in California
* Public education in California

* California school board elections, 2021

* Analysis of spending in America's largest school districts
* United States school shootings, 1990-present

## External links[edit]

* Search Google News for this topic
* Oakland Unified School District
* California Department of Education
* California School Boards Association

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "Board of Education Confirms Kyla Johnson-Trammell as OUSD Superintendent," accessed June 14, 2017
2. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "Meet Our Superintendent / Dr. Kyla Johnson-Trammell," accessed November 6, 2019
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 SF Gate, "Oakland schools get interim superintendent," December 14, 2016
4. ↑ East Bay Times, "Oakland: Interim schools superintendent to take helm Feb. 1," January 11, 2017
5. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "Superintendent Antwan Wilson," accessed June 28, 2016
6. ↑ Contra Costa Times, "New Oakland schools Superintendent Gary Yee faces high hurdles," July 3, 2013
7. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "Meet your Board of Education Directors," accessed January 14, 2014
8. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "BB 9323: Meeting Conduct," accessed July 13, 2021
9. ↑ United States Census Bureau, "Public School System Finances: Historical Data," accessed December 1, 2015
10. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "2021 - Salary Schedule TSA1 - Tsa 204 Day Salary," accessed July 13, 2021
11. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "2019 - Salary Schedule: K-12 Teachers," accessed July 13, 2021
12. ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 To protect student privacy, percentages were reported as ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five (5) or fewer students were included in a data set, the data was replaced by "PS."
14. ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "Four-Year Adjusted-Cohort Graduation Rates - School Year 2017-18 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
15. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "ElSi tableGenerator," accessed March 8, 2021
16. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Search for Public School Districts," accessed March 8, 2021
17. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey," accessed March 8, 2021
18. ↑ KPIX 5, "Parent Serves Oakland School Board President Recall Notice At Meeting," December 10, 2019
19. ↑ Mandy Gillip, "Phone communication with Alameda County Elections Office on December 17, 2019
20. ↑ East Bay Express, "Anger at OUSD ," February 5, 2020
21. ↑ The Recall Elections Blog, "California: Acting Oakland School Board President facing petitions," November 22, 2019
22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 EdSource, "Protesters collecting signatures to oust Oakland board member who backed school closing," November 22, 2019
23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 California Charter Schools Association, "CCSA Files Lawsuit Against Oakland Unified School District Seeking Compliance with Proposition 39," March 8, 2016
24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 California Charter Schools Association, "CCSA and OUSD Agree to Place Prop. 39 Lawsuit on Hold," September 29, 2016
25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 SF Gate, "Oakland school district’s error hinders students’ college plans," October 3, 2016
26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 East Bay Times, "Oakland: School’s lack of accreditation sparks student walkout," September 28, 2016
27. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "Media Advisory: Madison Park Academy High School Receives Early Word of Full Accreditation," October 6, 2016
28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Los Angeles Times, "Some California charter schools discriminate in admissions, ACLU report says," August 3, 2016
29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, "Charter Schools in Violation," accessed October 12, 2016
30. ↑ Oakland Unified School District, "Oakland Unified School District Authorized Charter Schools 2016-2017," accessed October 12, 2016
31. ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 32.4 32.5 32.6 East Bay Times, "Grand jury report: Better management needed of Oakland’s charter schools," June 24, 2016

v • e

List of the largest school districts in California

ABC Unified • Alameda • Alhambra • Alum Rock • Alvord • Anaheim City • Anaheim Union • Antelope Valley • Antioch • Apple Valley • Arcadia • Azusa • Bakersfield • Baldwin Park • Bellflower • Berkeley • Bonita • Burbank • Cajon Valley • Calexico • Capistrano • Carlsbad • Castro Valley Unified • Central Unified • Ceres • Chaffey • Chico • Chino Valley • Chula Vista • Clovis • Coachella Valley • Colton • Compton • Conejo Valley • Corona-Norco • Covina-Valley • Cupertino • Desert Sands • Downey • East Side • El Monte City • El Monte Union • El Rancho • Elk Grove • Escondido • Etiwanda • Evergreen • Fairfield-Suisun • Folsom-Cordova • Fontana • Franklin-McKinley • Fremont Unified • Fremont Union High • Fresno • Fullerton • Fullerton Joint Union • Garden Grove • Gilroy • Glendale • Grossmont • Hacienda La Puente • Hayward • Hemet • Hesperia • Huntington Beach • Inglewood • Irvine • Jurupa • Kern • Kings Canyon • La Mesa-Spring Valley • Lake Elsinore • Lancaster • Las Virgenes • Livermore Valley • Lodi • Lompoc • Long Beach • Los Alamitos • Los Angeles • Los Banos • Lucia Mar • Lynwood • Madera • Manteca • Marysville • Menifee • Merced City • Merced Union • Milpitas • Modesto • Montebello • Monterey Peninsula • Moreno Valley • Morgan Hill • Mount Diablo • Murrieta Valley • Napa Valley • Natomas • New Haven • Newport-Mesa • Norwalk-La Mirada • Oak Grove • Oakland • Ocean View • Oceanside • Ontario-Montclair • Orange • Oxnard • Oxnard Union • Pajaro Valley • Palm Springs • Palmdale • Palo Alto • Palos Verdes Peninsula • Panama-Buena Vista • Paramount • Pasadena • Perris • Pittsburg • Placentia-Yorba Linda • Pleasanton • Pomona • Porterville • Poway • Redlands • Redwood • Rialto • Riverside • Rocklin • Roseville City • Roseville Joint Union • Rowland • Sacramento • Saddleback Valley • Salinas • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Dieguito • San Francisco • San Jacinto • San Jose • San Juan • San Lorenzo • San Marcos • San Mateo-Foster • San Ramon Valley • Sanger • Santa Ana • Santa Barbara • Santa Clara • Santa Maria-Bonita • Santa Monica-Malibu • Santa Rosa • Saugus • Sequoia • Simi Valley • South San Francisco • Stockton • Sweetwater • Temecula Valley • Torrance • Tracy • Tulare • Turlock • Tustin • Twin Rivers • Upland • Vacaville • Val Verde • Vallejo City • Ventura • Victor Elementary • Victor Valley • Visalia • Vista • Walnut Valley • West Contra Costa • West Covina • Western Placer • Westminster • Whittier • William S. Hart Union • Woodland • Yuba City • Yucaipa-Calimesa

v • e

State of California
Sacramento (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy