San Benito County, California, Measure K, Land Use Referendum (March 2020)

San Benito County Measure K

Election date
March 3, 2020
Topic
Local zoning, land use and development
Status
d Defeated
Type
Initiative| Origin
Citizens

* * *

List of California measuresCalifornia Proposition 13 (March)California Proposition 14California Proposition 15California Proposition 16California Proposition 17California Proposition 18California Proposition 19California Proposition 20California Proposition 21California Proposition 22California Proposition 23California Proposition 24California Proposition 25Submit

* * *

A referendum regarding land use and zoning was on the ballot for voters in San Benito County, California, on March 3, 2020.[1] It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported adopting the county ordinance which zones certain areas surrounding Highway 101 for commercial use.

A "no" vote opposed adopting the county ordinance which zones certain areas surrounding Highway 101 for commercial use.

A simple majority was required for the approval of Measure K.

## Contents

* 1 Election results
* 2 Text of measure
* 2.1 Ballot question
* 2.2 Impartial analysis
* 2.3 Full text
* 3 Path to the ballot
* 4 See also
* 5 External links
* 6 Footnotes

## Election results[edit]

San Benito County Measure K

Result | Votes | Percentage
Yes | 6,802 | 40.21%

| 10,113 | 59.79%

Results are officially certified.
Source

## Text of measure[edit]

### Ballot question[edit]

The ballot question was as follows:[1]

“  |

Shall Ordinance No. 991, An Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Benito Amending the San Benito County Code to add text relating to the “Regional Commercial (C-3) District” be adopted?[2]

| ”

|
|

### Impartial analysis[edit]

The following impartial analysis of the measure was prepared by the office of the San Benito County Counsel:[1]

| “  |

The San Benito County Board of Supervisors approved Ordinance No. 991 on September 24, 2019, which amends the zoning regulations to include new provisions for the approximate total of 300 acres of Regional Commercial (C-3) zoned lands located at four separate interchanges along Highway 101. The regulations are intended to implement the Regional Commercial Land Use policies and standards included in the 2035 San Benito County General Plan that was adopted in 2015 with the objective of capturing tax revenue from Highway 101 travelers, promoting San Benito County local history and economy (e.g. agriculture, wineries, recreation), and marketing locally-produced agricultural products.

A timely submitted referendum petition protesting Ordinance No. 991 was certified with sufficient signatures of voters registered in San Benito County and presented to the Board of Supervisors on November 19, 2019. The Board of Supervisors then adopted a resolution ordering that Ordinance No. 991 be submitted to the voters on the March 3, 2020 Primary Election ballot. If a majority of San Benito County voters casting a ballot in that election vote to approve Ordinance No. 991, the ordinance will take effect. If less than a majority vote to approve the measure, the ordinance will be defeated. If the ordinance is defeated, the Board of Supervisors could then be required by state law (Gov. Code § 65860) to adopt other zoning regulations to be consistent with and implement the General Plan, or the Board could choose to amend the General Plan.

If Ordinance No. 991 is adopted by the voters, the Regional Commercial (C-3) zoning regulations will be included in the San Benito County Code. Generally, those regulations limit permitted uses to agriculture, grazing, and uses allowed by right in the Agriculture and Rangeland (AR) District, unless a site plan, conditional use permit or a Master Development Plan is approved by the Planning Commission for any type of commercial development. The maximum development permitted at any one of the four C-3 zoned areas is just under 12 acres of commercial structures if fully developed for all use types, including: up to 2.3 acres (i.e., a square 316.23 ft on each side) of retail commercial, up to 125 hotel rooms of no more than 750 square feet each – 8.6 acres if all single story; and, less than one acre with no more than 30 residential units of up to 1,400 square feet each The areas zoned C-3 total just under 300 acres: Betabel 29 acres Hwy 129 33 acres Livestock 101 159.3 acres Rocks Ranch 77.3 acres The site-specific environmental or fiscal impact of any proposed commercial development at any of the nodes cannot be determined until the location, type, and extent of a proposed project is submitted as part of a site plan, conditional use permit or Master Development Plan application to the County Planning Department.

A 'Yes' vote is for the adoption of Ordinance No. 991. A 'No' vote is against the adoption of Ordinance No. 991.[2]

| ”

|
|

### Full text[edit]

The full text of the measure is available here.

## Path to the ballot[edit]

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in California

This measure was put on the ballot through a successful veto referendum petition drive.[1]

## See also[edit]

Local measures

* Local measures in 2020
* Local zoning, land use and development on the ballot

* San Benito County measures

California

* March 3, 2020 measures in California
* Local ballot measures, California
* San Benito County, California

News and analysis

* State and local preemption conflicts
* Measures advancing national agendas

|
|

## External links[edit]

| Suggest a link

|

* Search Google News for this topic
* San Benito County Elections Office website

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 San Benito County Elections, "Measure K," accessed January 29, 2020
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.

v • e

Local ballot measures in California

Counties|

Alameda • Alpine • Amador • Butte • Calaveras • Colusa • Contra Costa • Del Norte • El Dorado • Fresno • Glenn • Humboldt • Imperial • Inyo • Kern • Kings • Lake • Lassen • Los Angeles • Madera • Marin • Mariposa • Mendocino • Merced • Modoc • Mono • Monterey • Napa • Nevada • Orange • Placer • Plumas • Riverside • Sacramento • San Benito • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Francisco • San Joaquin • San Luis Obispo • San Mateo • Santa Barbara • Santa Clara • Santa Cruz • Shasta • Sierra • Siskiyou • Solano • Sonoma • Stanislaus • Sutter • Tehama • Trinity • Tulare • Tuolumne • Ventura • Yolo • Yuba

* * *

Analysis|

Laws governing local ballot measures in California • Ballot measure information on California county websites • Costs of administering local elections • Required approval rates for local California ballot measures

* * *

2022|

April 12 •

* * *

2021|

March 2 • May 4 • June 8 • June 29 • August 31

* * *

2020|

March 3 • April 14 • May 5 • June 2 • June 23 • August 25 • November 3

* * *

2019|

February 26 • March 5 • March 19 • March 26 • April 9 • May 7 • June 4 • August 27 • November 5

* * *

2018|

January 23 • January 30 • February 27 • March 6 • June 5 • November 6

* * *

2017|

January 10 • February 28 • March 7 • March 28 • April 4 • April 11 • May 2 • May 9 • May 16 • June 6 • July 11 • August 22 • August 29 • October 17 • November 7

* * *

2016|

January 26 • February 23 • March 8 • April 12 • April 19 • May 3 • June 7 • November 8

* * *

2015|

January 6 • February 24 • March 3 • March 10 • March 24 • April 14 • May 5 • May 19 • June 2 • June 23 • August 25 • September 1 • October 6 • November 3 • November 17

* * *

2014|

February 4 • February 11 • March 4 • April 8 • May 6 • June 3 • July 8 • September 2 • November 4

* * *

2013|

March 5 • March 12 • April 2 • April 9 • May 7 • May 21 • June 4 • June 11 • June 18 • July 2 • July 16 • July 23 • August 27 • November 5

* * *

2012|

February 7 • March 6 • March 13 • April 6 • April 10 • May 1 • May 8 • June 5 • July 10 • August 28 • September 18 • November 6

* * *

2011|

January 25 • March 1 • March 8 • April 5 • April 12 • May 3 • June 7 • June 21 • July 12 • August 30 • November 8 • November 15 • November 22

* * *

2010|

January 12 • February 2 • February 23 • March 2 • March 9 • April 13 • May 4 • May 25 • June 8 • June 15 • June 22 • July 13 • August 24 • August 31 • September 21 • November 2

* * *

2009|

January 13 • February 24 • March 3 • March 10 • April 21 • May 5 • May 19 • June 2 • June 9 • June 16 • June 23 • June 30 • July 21 • August 4 • August 25 • August 28 • November 3 • November 17 • December 8 • December 15

* * *

2008|

February 5 • March 4 • April 8 • June 3 • June 24 • July 22 • August 26 • November 4

* * *

2007|

March 6 • May 7 • November 6

* * *

2006|

March 7 • April 11 • May 2 • June 6 • November 7

* * *

Political topics|

Advisory votes • Binding arbitration • Business taxes • City charters • Election and voting laws • Gambling • Gann overrides • Hotel taxes • Incorporations • Immigration • Jurisdictional boundaries • Labor • Marijuana • Marijuana taxes • Mottos • Municipal bonds • Parcel taxes • Pensions • Project-Labor Agreements • Recall • Red light cameras • Rent control • Salaries of local officials • Sales taxes • School bonds • Term limits • Utility user taxes • Vehicle registration taxes • Zoning and land use

* * *

v • e

State of California
Sacramento (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2022 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy