Laws governing the initiative process in Montana

# Laws and procedures[edit]

Laws governing ballot measures in the U.S.

* * *

Laws governing ballot measures in the U.S.

Changes to laws governing ballot measures

Types of ballot measures

Ballot measure policy topics

* * *

Select a state from the dropdown to learn more about laws governing ballot measures in that state.

Select a state Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Contents

1 Laws and procedures
1.1 Crafting an initiative
1.1.1 Single-subject rule
1.1.2 Subject restrictions
1.1.3 Competing initiatives
1.2 Starting a petition
1.2.1 Applying to petition
1.2.2 Proposal review/approval
1.2.3 Fiscal review
1.2.4 Petition summary
1.3 Collecting signatures
1.3.1 Number required
1.3.2 Distribution requirements
1.3.3 Restrictions on circulators
1.3.4 Electronic signatures
1.3.5 Deadlines for collection
1.4 Getting on the ballot
1.4.1 Signature verification
1.4.2 Ballot title and summary
1.5 The election and beyond
1.5.1 Supermajority requirements
1.5.2 Effective date
1.5.3 Litigation
1.5.4 Legislative alteration
1.5.5 Re-attempting an initiative
1.6 Funding an initiative campaign
1.7 State initiative law
2 Changes in the law

Citizens of Montana may initiate a new law as either a state statute or a constitutional amendment. In Montana, citizens also have the power to repeal legislation via veto referendum and call a constitutional convention by initiative. The Montana State Legislature may also place measures on the ballot as legislatively referred constitutional amendments or legislatively referred state statutes.

## Crafting an initiative[edit]

Of the 24 states that allow citizens to initiate legislation through the petition process, several states have adopted restrictions and regulations that limit the scope and content of proposed initiatives. These regulations may include laws that mandate that initiatives address only one topic, restrict the range of acceptable topics for proposed laws, prohibit unfunded mandates and establish guidelines for adjudicating contradictory measures.

### Single-subject rule[edit]

See also: Single-subject rule

The Montana Constitution requires that constitutional amendments must meet a separate vote requirement. Separate-vote requirements and single-subject rules are related and have some overlapping intentions and effects. The state constitution reads:

"If more than one amendment is submitted at the same election, each shall be so prepared and distinguished that it can be voted upon separately."

In 1999, the Montana Supreme Court held that this section imposes a narrower requirement than a single subject rule. In the case, Marshall v. State ex rel. Cooney, the court found a proposal unconstitutional for amending more than one section of the state constitution.

A single-subject rule found in Article V, Section 11 of the constitution that says "each bill, except [...], shall contain only one subject, clearly expressed in its title" was, prior to 2017, thought to impose a single-subject rule on all initiatives, including initiated state statutes. In a court case over Initiative 116—the Marsy's Law Crime Victims Rights measure—the Montana Supreme Court stated that this provision applied to legislative bills but not to initiatives. The court overturned the Marsy's Law initiative based on the separate-vote requirement, however.

See law: Montana Constitution, Article V, Section 11(3) and Article XIV, Section 11

### Subject restrictions[edit]

See also: Subject restrictions (ballot measures)

Petitioners in Montana may not propose legislation on certain subjects. Initiated laws may not make appropriations or create local or special laws.

A 2021 law—House Bill 651—defined appropriations to include directly or indirectly creating a financial obligation or expanding the eligibility for a government program.[1]

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 4(1)

### Veto referendums on emergency legislation[edit]

In Montana, veto referendums can be used on emergency legislation.

* Signatures are due no later than six months after adjournment of the legislature.

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 5 and Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27

### Competing initiatives[edit]

See also: Superseding initiative; "Poison pills"; List of Montana ballot measures

Montana law does not address competing ballot initiatives, except by requiring the attorney general to notify the secretary of state about conflicting proposals. The law does not prohibit conflicting proposals. From 2002 to 2014, no competing measures had been on Montana ballot. However, two 2002 initiatives, IR-117 and I-145, both attempted to the repeal the Montana Power Authority -- only IR-117 was successful.

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 4 ; Article IV, Section 7 ; Article XIV, Sections 9-11 and Montana Code, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 202

## Starting a petition[edit]

Each initiative and referendum state employs a different procedure for filing petition applications. Some states require preliminary signatures while others do not. In addition, several states review each proposed statute, verifying that the law conforms to the style and conventions of state law and recommending alterations to initiative proponents. Some of these states also review the law for more substantive considerations of content and consistency. Also, many states conduct a review of the ballot title and summary, and several states employ a fiscal review process which analyzes proposed laws to determine their impact on state finances.[2][3][4]

### Applying to petition[edit]

See also: Approved for circulation

Prior to collecting signatures, the initiative sponsor must file a draft of the amendment text with the secretary of state. He or she must also file drafts of the statement of purpose and the statements explaining a "yes" or a "no" vote.[5]

See law: Montana Code, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 202

### Proposal review/approval[edit]

See also: Approved for circulation

After a proposal has been submitted, the secretary transfers the proposal to the Legislative Services Division. The division reviews the measure and accompanying statements for "clarity, consistency, and conformity with the most recent edition of the bill drafting manual." The division then recommends changes to the proponent. The proponent must respond in writing, detailing which recommendations have been accepted, which have been rejected and which the proponent wants to modify. Failure to include any substantive changes made to the proposal in this reply is grounds for rejecting the proposal.

Once this review process is complete, the measure is transferred to the attorney general for review. The attorney general then reviews the ballot language for compliance with the state's single-subject rule and subject restrictions and other statutory requirements. The attorney general may not engage in a substantive constitutional legal review of the measure. He or she also reviews the ballot statements for fairness and clarity. The attorney general is required to seek the advice of opponents and proponents in conducting this review.[1]

After the attorney general's review, the relevant state legislative committee votes on whether to support or oppose the placement of the measure on the ballot. That vote does not have any procedural effect, but the results of the vote are included on petition sheets.[1]

See law: Montana Code, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 202 and Section 312

### Fiscal review[edit]

See also: Fiscal impact statement

During the attorney general's review, he or she must determine if the bill affects state revenues or expenditures. If so, the budget director must prepare a short fiscal note for inclusion on the petition and ballot.

The attorney general must also determine whether the initiative would "cause significant material harm to one or more business interests in Montana" and prepare a statement on the determination for inclusion on the petition sheets.[1]

See law: Montana Code, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 312

### Petition summary[edit]

See also: Starting a petition

Once the attorney general has approved a measure and its accompanying statements, the secretary prepares a proof copy of the petition. Petition forms include the text of the proposal; the statement of purpose; the fiscal note, if required; the statements explaining a "yes" or a "no" vote; the results of the vote by the relevant legislative committee to support or oppose placing the measure on the ballot; and a statement by the attorney general concerning whether the initiative would "cause significant material harm to one or more business interests in Montana."[1]

See law: Montana Code, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 202

## Collecting signatures[edit]

Each initiative and referendum state employs a unique method of calculating the state's signature requirements. Some states mandate a certain fraction of registered voters while others base their calculation on those who actually voted in a preceding election. In addition, many states employ a distribution requirement, dictating where in the state these signatures must be collected. Beyond these overarching requirements, many states regulate the manner in which signatures may be collected and the timeline for collecting them.

### Number required[edit]

See also: Montana signature requirements

In Montana, the number of signatures required to qualify a measure for the ballot is tied to how many votes were cast in the last gubernatorial election. To place an initiated constitutional amendment on the ballot, proponents must collect valid signatures signatures equal to 10 percent of votes cast for governor in the last gubernatorial general election. For an initiated state statute or veto referendum, signatures equal to 5 percent of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election are required. Whether a bill targeted by a veto referendum petition is suspended depends on the distribution requirement met, although the total requirement is the same. The petition must contain signatures equal to 5 percent of votes cast for governor from at least one-third of legislative districts to qualify the referendum for the ballot. If the petition contains signatures equal to 15 percent of votes cast for governor from a majority of legislative districts, it suspends the targeted law until the election.

The chart below shows election years and the signature requirement for initiatives designed to appear on the ballot in that year, with gubernatorial election years bolded.

Year  | Amendment  | Statute  | Veto referendum

|
|
|

2028 | 60,241 | 30,121 | 30,121
2026 | 60,241 | 30,121 | 30,121
2024 | 60,359 | 30,180 | 30,180
2022 | 60,359 | 30,180 | 30,180
2020 | 50,936 | 25,468 | 25,468
2018 | 50,936 | 25,468 | 25,468
2016 | 48,349 | 24,174 | 24,174
2014 | 48,349 | 24,174 | 24,174
2012 | 47,694 | 23,847 | 23,847
2010 | 47,694 | 23,847 | 23,847
2008 | 44,615 | 22,308 | 22,308

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 4 Montana Constitution Article III, Section 7 & Article XIV, Section 9

### Distribution requirements[edit]

See also: Distribution requirements

For a constitutional amendment, proponents must collect signatures equal to 10 percent of the qualified electors in each of two-fifths (40) of the state's 100 legislative districts. For an initiated statute or a veto referendum, signatures must be equal to 5 percent of the qualified electors in each of one-third (34) of the state's legislative districts. The number of qualified electors in any district, for the purpose of the distribution requirement, is equal to the number of votes cast for governor in that district in the last gubernatorial election.

If a petition is circulated after redistricting and before the next gubernatorial election, the number of qualified electors in each district is equal to the total number of votes cast for governor statewide divided by the total number of districts.

In 2002, two amendments,  C-37 and C-38, attempted to change the basis for the distribution requirement from legislative districts to counties. However, given population disparities among counties, the amendments were struck down by a federal court in Montana PIRG v. Johnson.

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 4 ; Article XIV, Section 9 and Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 303(2)

### Restrictions on circulators[edit]

#### Circulator requirements[edit]

See also: Petition circulator

No law could be found prohibiting circulators from signing their own petition. Each initiative petition form contains a circulator affidavit, which must be signed by the circulator before a notary public. A circulator is not, however, required to swear and sign under the penalty of a law a statement that he/she personally witnessed every act of signing the petition.[6] Montana State Code requires that a petition circulator be a resident of Montana and prohibits circulators being paid on a per-signature basis.[7][8] Once completed, signed sheets or sections of petitions with original signatures must be submitted to the official responsible for registration of electors in the county in which the signatures were obtained.[9]

The employers of paid circulators must register with the state and pay a fee.[1]

See laws: Montana Code Annotated, Section 13-27-102, Montana Code Annotated, Section 1-1-215, Montana Code Annotated, Section 13-27-301 and Montana Code Annotated, Section 13-27-302

#### Pay-per-signature[edit]

See also: Pay-per-signature

Montana prohibits paying signature gatherers based on the number of signatures collected.

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 102

#### Out-of-state circulators[edit]

See also: Residency requirements for petition circulators

Montana does not require signature gatherers to be residents of the state. In Pierce et al. v. Jacobsen et al. (2022), a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Montana cannot restrict circulators from out-of-state. Judge John Tunheim wrote, "[T]he residency requirement imposes an outright ban on a form of core political speech for all non-residents and necessarily diminishes the pool of (petition) circulators. We thus hold that the residency requirement here imposes a severe burden on the First Amendment rights of both out-of-state residents and instate proponents."[10] [11]

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 102

#### Badge requirements[edit]

See also: Badge requirements

In Montana, paid circulators are required to wear a badge that states their first name and last initial, their status as a paid signature gatherer, and the state in which they reside.

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27

### Electronic signatures[edit]

See also: Electronic petition signatures

Electronic signatures were prohibited under Montana Senate Bill 93, signed in 2023.[12]

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27 Sec. 103

### Deadlines for collection[edit]

See also: Petition drive deadlines; Initiative petition circulation periods

Once proponents have received the official petition proof copy, they have a maximum of one year to circulate petitions and receive certification from county election officials. The county officials must submit each verified petition to the secretary of state by the final filing deadline, which comes on the third Friday of the fourth month prior to the election. Proponents must submit their petitions to county officials no sooner than nine months and no later than four weeks prior to the final filing deadline. Proponents may begin collecting signatures no earlier than one year prior to the final filing deadline.

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 104 and Section 202

## Getting on the ballot[edit]

Once signatures have been collected, state officials must verify that requirements are met and that fraudulent signatures are excluded. States generally employ a random sample process or a full verification of signatures. After verification, the issue must be prepared for the ballot. This often involves preparing a fiscal review and ballot summary.

### Signature verification[edit]

See also: Signature certification

Petitioners must submit their signatures to county election officials for verification. The verification process involves two steps. First, county officials verify that each name on the sheets corresponds to a registered voter. Second, they verify the authenticity of a random sample of signatures against the corresponding signatures on voter registration records. If any signature appears to be forged, all signatures on the affected sheet or section must be checked for authenticity. Once the county officials have completed this process, they must forward both their official total and the petition sheets themselves to the secretary of state.

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 303 (1) and Section 304

### Ballot title and summary[edit]

See also: Ballot title

In Montana, the ballot title is identical with the summary on the statement of purpose. It is prepared by petitioners, reviewed by the Legislative Services Division, and approved by the attorney general prior to signature collection. The ballot title must be less than 100 words and must clearly explain the purpose of the measure.

Each measure also receives a generic title during the initial review process (e.g. I-161, CI-105, LR-119, C-43, IR-124, CC-2) and an identifying statement, such as "an act referred by the legislature" or "a constitutional amendment proposed by initiative petition."

* A 2008 sample ballot can be found here.

See law: Montana Code, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 202, Section 312 and Section 501

## The election and beyond[edit]

Ballot measures face additional challenges beyond qualifying for the ballot and receiving a majority of the vote. Several states require ballot measures to get more than a simple majority. While some states mandate a three-fifths supermajority, other states set the margin differently. In addition, ballot measures may face legal challenges or modifications by legislators. If a ballot measure does fail, some states limit how soon that initiative can be re-attempted.

### Supermajority requirements[edit]

See also: Supermajority requirements

Montana ballot measures do not require a supermajority for passage.

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 4 and Article XIV, Section 9

### Effective date[edit]

Unless the measure specifies otherwise, approved ballot measures take effect on the first day of October following the election. Constitutional measures are effective July 1 following approval unless otherwise specified.

See law: Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 105

### Litigation[edit]

See also: Ballot measure lawsuit news

The Montana Constitution gives priority to cases challenging initiatives. The constitution also forbids any challenge of the process of placing a measure on the ballot once the election has been held. In addition, the constitution requires that any measure overturned because of an improperly conducted election be presented to voters again at the next election.

Both proponents and opponents of a measure may challenge the attorney general's decision regarding the ballot statements and the proposal's compliance with legal and constitutional requirements. These challenges should be filed in the Montana Supreme Court. Any qualified elector may challenge the certification of a measure for the ballot due to invalid signatures or an erroneous count. These challenges should be filed in the district court in the county of residence of the individual bringing the action.

See law: Montana Constitution, Article IV, Section 7 and Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 316 and Section 317

### Legislative alteration[edit]

See also: Legislative alteration

The Montana State Legislature may repeal or amend any statute approved by voters. To repeal or alter an amendment, they must follow the ordinary legislative referral process. In order to place an amendment on the ballot, lawmakers must adopt the proposal by a two-thirds (66.67%) vote of all members.[13]

See law: Montana Constitution, Article XIV, Section 8

### Re-attempting an initiative[edit]

Montana does not limit how soon an initiative can be re-attempted.[14]

See law: Montana Constitution, Article III, Section 4 ; Article IV, Section 7 ; Article XIV, Sections 9-11 and Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27

## Funding an initiative campaign[edit]

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Montana ballot measures

Some of the notable features of Montana's campaign finance laws include:

* Montana treats groups that are registered to support or oppose a ballot question the same as other political committees.
* Montana has a separate designation for independent expenditure groups influencing a ballot question called a incidental political committee.
* During the last ten days before the election, Montana requires the reporting of all campaign contributions of $500 or more within 24 hours of receiving the contribution.
* Montana allows corporations and labor unions to donate to political committees in support of or opposition to a ballot question.
* Montana requires reporting of all campaign debts of $500 or more used towards election materials within 24 hours of receipt of the transaction.

## State initiative law[edit]

Articles III, IV, XIV of the Montana Constitution address initiative, referendum, and recall.

* Montana Constitution, Article III ; Article IV ; Article XIV

Title 13, Chapter 27 of the Montana Code Annotated governs initiative, referendum, and recall.

* Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27

## External links[edit]

* Montana Secretary of State, "Elections"
* Montana Secretary of State, "Ballot Issue Overview, Forms and Guidelines"

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Montana Legislature, "House bill 651 (2021)," accessed May 13, 2022
2. ↑ NCSL, "Drafting the Initiative Proposal," accessed May 19, 2011
3. ↑ NCSL, "Preparation of a Fiscal Analysis," accessed May 19, 2011
4. ↑ NCSL, "Preparation of a Ballot Title and Summary," accessed May 19, 2011
5. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "Montana Senate Bill 93 (2023)," accessed October 2, 2023
6. ↑ Montana Legislature, "Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 302," accessed December 1, 2021
7. ↑ Montana Legislature, "Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 102," accessed December 1, 2021
8. ↑ Montana Legislature, "Montana Code Annotated, Section 1-1-215: Residence requirements," accessed December 1, 2021
9. ↑ Montana Legislature, "Montana Code Annotated, Title 13, Chapter 27, Section 301," accessed December 1, 2021
10. ↑ Helena Independent Record, "Appeals court allows out-of-state signature gathers in Montana," August 10, 2022
11. ↑ Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pierce et al. v. Jacobsen et al., August 10, 2022
12. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "Montana Senate Bill 93," accessed October 2, 2023
13. ↑ NCSL, "Limiting the Legislature's Power to Amend and Repeal Initiated Statutes," updated June 28, 2011
14. ↑ NCSL, "Banning Same or Similar Measures from the Ballot for a Specified Period of Time," May 2009

Laws governing ballot measures in the United States

Laws governing ballot measures

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Changes to laws governing ballot measures

2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018

Types of ballot measures

Citizen-initiated ballot measures • Legislatively referred ballot measures • Automatically referred ballot measures • Commission-referred ballot measures • Convention-referred constitutional amendments

Ballot measure policy terms

Glossary of ballot measure policy terms

v • e

State of Montana
Helena (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy

# Changes in the law[edit]

Contents

1 Laws and procedures
2 Changes in the law
2.1 Proposed changes by year
2.1.1 2022
2.1.2 2021
2.1.3 2010
2.1.4 2019
2.1.5 2018
2.1.6 2017
2.1.7 2016
2.1.8 2015
2.1.9 2014
2.1.10 2013

The following laws have been proposed that modify ballot measure law in Montana. If a box is empty for any given year, it means Ballotpedia did not track any ballot measure or recall-related laws in that year.

## Proposed changes by year[edit]

### 2022[edit]

See also: Changes in 2022 to laws governing ballot measures

#### Pierce et al. v. Jacobsen et al.[edit]

See also: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pierce et al. v. Jacobsen et al., August 10, 2022

On August 10, 2022, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Montana is allowed to ban paying circulators based on the number of signatures collected but cannot restrict circulators from out-of-state.[1]

Regarding the restriction on out-of-state signature gatherers, Judge John Tunheim wrote, "[T]he residency requirement imposes an outright ban on a form of core political speech for all non-residents and necessarily diminishes the pool of (petition) circulators. We thus hold that the residency requirement here imposes a severe burden on the First Amendment rights of both out-of-state residents and instate proponents."[2]

Regarding the ban on pay-per-signature, the opinion read that "the restriction rationally reduces the incentive to forge signatures and commit fraud" and "the state has established that an important regulatory interest is furthered by this restriction."[1]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pierce et al. v. Jacobsen et al., August 10, 2022
2. ↑ Helena Independent Record, "Appeals court allows out-of-state signature gathers in Montana," August 10, 2022

|

### 2021[edit]

See also: Changes in 2021 to laws governing ballot measures

* House Bill 651: The legislative made several changes to laws governing the initiative process, including:[1]

* defining appropriations, which the Michigan Constitution prohibits initiatives from making, to include actions that directly or indirectly create a financial obligation or broaden the eligibility for a government program;
* requiring the relevant legislative committee or legislative council to vote on whether to support or oppose adding an initiative to the ballot and requiring the vote results to be published on the initiative petition;
* requiring the employers of paid signature gatherers to register with the state and pay a filing fee; and
* requiring the attorney general to determine whether a ballot initiative "will likely cause significant material harm to one or more business interests in Montana" and include such a statement on the initiative petition.

* Senate Bill 113: The legislation provided that statute section numbers do not count toward the 100-word limit for the ballot titles of legislatively referred ballot measures.[2]

1. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "House Bill 651," accessed June 21, 2023
2. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "Senate Bill 113," accessed June 21, 2023

|

### 2020[edit]

See also: Changes in 2020 to laws governing ballot measures

|

### 2019[edit]

See also: Changes in 2019 to laws governing ballot measures

* House Bill 244 (C-46): Voters approved the constitutional amendment, which amended constitutional language to match the existing signature distribution requirements for initiated constitutional amendments based on judicial rulings and opinions.[1]

* House Bill 245 (C-47): Voters approved the constitutional amendment, which amended constitutional language to match the existing signature distribution requirements for initiated state statutes and veto referendums based on judicial rulings and opinions.[2]

* Senate Bill 231: The legislation required that the legislative sponsor of a legislatively referred state statute or legislatively referred constitutional amendment be appointed to the committee to draft the argument in favor of the measure unless the sponsor is unable to or declines.[3]

1. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "House Bill 244," accessed June 27, 2023
2. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "House Bill 245," accessed June 27, 2023
3. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "Senate Bill 231," accessed June 27, 2023

|

### 2018[edit]

See also: Changes in 2018 to laws governing ballot measures

|

### 2017[edit]

See also: Changes in 2017 to laws governing ballot measures

|

### 2016[edit]

See also: Changes in 2016 to laws governing ballot measures

|

### 2015[edit]

See also: Changes in 2015 to laws governing ballot measures

See also: Laws governing ballot measures in Montana

1. a Senate Bill 289: Revised campaign finance laws to implement more rules and clarify definitions concerning the disclosure of funding sources. The bill also required disclosure of the funding sources of political ads and other campaign finance disclosure requirements.[1]
2. d House Bill 131: Revises campaign finance reporting deadlines.
3. d House Bill 220: "An act revising recall laws; allowing elected officials of state-districts or political subdivisions to be recalled for any reason; amending signatures requirements for recall elections."[2]
4. d House Bill 303: "Recall petitions for school board trustees must be filed with the county superintendent of schools responsible for overseeing the school district."

1. ↑ Great Falls Tribune, "Senate endorses campaign finance reform bill," February 25, 2015
2. ↑ Montana State Legislature, "House Bill 220," accessed January 24, 2015

|

### 2014[edit]

See also: Changes in 2014 to laws governing ballot measures

|

### 2013[edit]

See also: Changes in 2013 to laws governing ballot measures

The following bills were introduced in the Montana State Legislature:

d HB 126: Generally revise ballot issues and petition statutes.

d HB 349: Provides for state reimbursing counties for legislative referenda ballot costs; relates to elections.

d HB 419: Revises public official recall laws.

d HB 445: Details regulations regarding educating the electorate on ballot issues to appear on an upcoming election ballot.

d HB 496: Exempts from the definitions of contribution and expenditure the cost of any communication by a religious organization qualified under U.S.C. 501c(3) made in the course of the organization's religious activities.

d HB 615: Amends the state constitution to require that legislative referrals must be passed by three-fifths of the members of each house of the legislature.

d SB 204: Amend constitution to prohibit fishing/hunting/trapping laws by initiative.

d SB 321: Revise initiative process laws related to public involvement.

|

### 2012[edit]

See also: Changes in 2012 to laws governing ballot measures

No bills were introduced in the Montana State Legislature in 2012.

|

### 2011[edit]

See also: Changes in 2011 to laws governing ballot measures

The following bills were introduced in the Montana State Legislature:

a Montana House Bill 310: HB 310 would require ballot and petition language to clearly indicate the meaning of a "yes" or a "no" vote.

d Montana Senate Bill 162: SB 162 would require the state to reimburse local governments for costs associated with placing legislatively referred measures on the ballot.

d Montana Senate Bill 204: SB 204 is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment which would raise the signature requirement from 10% to 20% of qualified electors. It would also change the basis of the state's distribution requirement from counties to legislative districts.

a Montana House Bill 391 (2011): HB 391 was passed by the Montana Legislature on March 28, 2011 and has since become law. The law prohibits local ballot measure from setting the enforcement priority of state laws. The law is seen as targeting a local ballot measure which instructed local law enforcement to make marijuana laws their lowest priority.[1][2] Citizens in Charge Foundation rating:  Reduces initiative rights.

1. ↑ Bill History, HB 391
2. ↑ Billings Gazette, "Missoula County attorney's attempt to override marijuana initiative creates uproar," January 20, 2011

|

### 2010[edit]

See also: Changes in 2010 to laws governing ballot measures

No proposed changes were identified in 2010.

Laws governing ballot measures in the United States

Laws governing ballot measures

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Changes to laws governing ballot measures

2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018

Types of ballot measures

Citizen-initiated ballot measures • Legislatively referred ballot measures • Automatically referred ballot measures • Commission-referred ballot measures • Convention-referred constitutional amendments

Ballot measure policy terms

Glossary of ballot measure policy terms

v • e

State of Montana
Helena (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy