Noteworthy cases coverage at Ballotpedia

* * *

* * *

How does Ballotpedia...
...define candidacy?
...define incumbency?
...order candidate lists?
...choose battlegrounds?
...cover primaries?
...cover endorsements?
...cover campaign finance?
...cover polls?
...cover recall efforts?
...call an election?
...cover recounts?
...handle postponements?

* * *

Ballotpedia is the online encyclopedia of American politics and elections. Our goal is to inform people about politics by providing accurate and objective information about politics at all levels of government. Ballotpedia covers local, state, and federal politics. Our content includes neutral, accurate, and verifiable information on government officials and the offices they hold, political issues and public policy, elections, candidates, and the influencers of politics. As part of these efforts to provide encyclopedic content, and consistent with our firm commitment to neutrality, we sometimes make editorial judgments to better serve our mission and our readers.

One such area is in highlighting noteworthy cases on our judicial profiles. The decision to include a case as noteworthy is based on Ballotpedia's criteria for inclusion, which were drafted and adopted in April 2017. These criteria were developed by our professional writers and editors and approved by our senior editorial team.

## Selection criteria for noteworthy cases[edit]

The decision to classify a case as noteworthy is based on a decision-tree analysis. We analyze potential cases based on a series of dichotomous questions. Not every case that satisfies our criteria will be included, but these criteria serve to guide our decisions as to whether a case merits inclusion.

Question One: Does the case set or overturn an existing legal precedent such that the case:

(a) materially affects a politically significant population or subpopulation, or
(b) substantively relates to an area of editorial interest to Ballotpedia, or
(c) reverses an established, longstanding precedent (greater than 50 years) and/or was established through a court of last resort?

If the answer to any of these is yes, we may consider the case noteworthy. If the answer to all of these is no, we proceed to a secondary analysis.

Question Two: Is the ruling being used against a sitting judge or a judicial nominee in a public way (election campaigns, reappointment campaigns, impeachment/recall proceedings) and has the judge/nominee commented (or had opportunity to comment) upon the complaints?

If the answer to this question is yes, we may consider the case noteworthy. If the answer is no, we consider one additional criterion.

Question Three: Is the case receiving state and/or federal coverage in traditional, wide-circulation mass media that names and directly quotes the judge?

If the answer to this question is yes, we may consider the case noteworthy.

In addition to the criteria listed above, Ballotpedia reserves the right to include cases falling outside the scope of these criteria should an editorial judgment be made that the case merits inclusion.

If you have any questions or comments about our criteria for noteworthy cases, please contact editor@ballotpedia.org.

v • e

Ballotpedia policy explainers

Candidates and officeholders|

How we define candidacy • How we research for proof of official candidacy (FAQs) • How we define noteworthy presidential candidates • How we define incumbency • How we handle partisan affiliation • How we cover campaign themes • How we write biographies • How we cover noteworthy events • How we cover noteworthy cases • How we organize social media platform links on person profiles • How we review person photo submissions • How we review candidate video submissions • How we verify Candidate Connection survey responses • How we handle Candidate Connection survey edit and removal requests

Election coverage|

How we choose battleground elections • How we cover primaries • How we order candidate lists • How we cover polls • How we cover endorsements • How we cover campaign finance and satellite spending • How we decide when to update vote totals on and after election night • How we decide when to call an election • How we decide when to cover a recall effort • How we cover election lawsuits and recounts • How we write ballot measure article titles • How we write original summaries of ballot measures • How we cover endorsements in support of or opposition to ballot measures • How we cover media editorial endorsements in support of or opposition to ballot measures • How we cover ballot measure campaign finance • How we calculate initiative signature petition costs • The Ballotpedia Power Index • How we handle court-ordered postponements of election dates and candidate filing deadlines

Scope, editorial approach, and other policies|

Ballotpedia's overall scope • Elections editorial approach • Federal government editorial approach • State government editorial approach • Local government editorial approach • Influencers editorial approach • Fact check editorial approach • Public Policy editorial approach • Editorial policy • Writing about key campaign messages • Writing about reports and analyses • Story selection for the Daily Presidential News Briefing • Story selection for presidential election news events • Editorial independence policy • By-district vs. at-large election boundaries • Partnership with Transparency USA • Criminal behavior and scandal policy • Ad policy • Privacy policy • MyVote privacy policy • Plagiarism policy • Image use policy • Copyright policy • Error correction policy • Content accuracy policy • Generative AI policy • Neutral point of view policy • Categories of bias • General disclaimer

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond
External Relations:  Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events • Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Victoria Edwards • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Thomas Grobben • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Brandon McCauley • Andrew McNair • Ellie Mikus • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox • Heather Yates