Life (moral value)

| This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

* * *

Life (moral value) could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

|

Thinking hardly
or hardly thinking?
Philosophy

Major trains of thought

* Logic
* Morality
* Reality

The good, the bad,
and the brain fart

* Cultural relativism
* Ghazali
* Cognitive science
* Zen
* Simulated reality
* Integrity
* Everlasting No
* Religion

Come to think of it

* Religion
* Science
* Philosophy of science
* Ethics
* Psychology

v \- t \- e

Life, or the preservation of it, is often thought to be the single moral principle by which actions should be measured. Arguably, there are values which supersede life: safety, the quality of life, justice, etc.

For example, to what extent life should be valued is measured by quality. It is fairly reasonable to say that one cannot have safety without life, but it is more reasonable to say that safety increases the value of life. In other words, what is the quality of life without safety? Another way to ask this would be: "Don't soldiers sacrifice their life for the safety of others?" This, of course, suggests that safety is more important than life. The moral value of life is also a paradox in some situations, because sometimes it takes the sacrifice of life to preserve life.

Popular ideologies that may place a heavy emphasis on life are vegetarianism, veganism, pacifism, and anti-abortion activism.

The Terri Schiavo situation also highlighted the issues involved in evaluating the viability and presence of human life.

## See also[edit]

* Life
* Morality

This philosophy-related article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.