Homology

Forelimb homology among vertebrates, with colors indicating homologous parts: A=human, B=dog, C=bird, D=whale

We're all Homo here
Evolution

Relevant Hominids

* Charles Darwin
* Alfred Russel Wallace
* Gregor Mendel
* Richard Dawkins
* Jerry Coyne

A Gradual Science

* Scopes trial
* The Ant and the Peacock
* Eva Jablonka
* Altenberg 16 controversy

Plain Monkey Business

* Young Earth Creationism
* Old Earth Creationism
* Intelligent Design
* Microevolution vs. Macroevolution

v \- t \- e

Homology, also known as comparative anatomy, in biology is the occurrence and study of shared traits between different taxa due to common descent. The term homology was coined by the infamous British paleontologist and anatomist Richard Owen in 1845, and was later explained as a result of Darwin's theory of evolution after the publication of the Origin in 1859.[1][2]

## Contents

* 1 Definition
* 1.1 Difference between homology and analogy
* 2 Science
* 3 References

## Definition[edit]

Homology, as stated above, refers to the occurrence of shared traits or structures in different but related taxa that is a result of shared ancestry. Homology therefore implies divergent evolution from a common ancestor, for example, many insects share two sets of wings, this shared feature among insects is a result of common ancestry, and therefore is considered to be a homologous structure.[3][4]

Aside from the aforementioned double pair of wings found in insects, other examples of homology include the forearm structure of tetrapod limbs, this is perhaps the most famous example of homology, and is featured in many textbooks. The flippers of dolphins, the wings of bats and birds, and the arms and grasping hands of humans are all homologous to each other, each resulting from a shared ancestor akin to something like Acanthostega gunnari or the famous "fishapod" Tiktaalik.[5]

### Difference between homology and analogy[edit]

See the main article on this topic: Convergent evolution

While homology and analogy both concern themselves with similarities, the former differs from the latter in that homology refers to any similar structure found in related taxa that has been inherited as a result of common descent, whereas analogy refers to similar structures that have been derived independently of one another in different, unrelated taxa.[6]

## Science[edit]

The field of evolutionary developmental biology can identify homologous structures found present during the development of the fetus in the womb. While it's not true that "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" as Haeckel so famously put it, it is true that similar stages of development can be found during embryonic genesis among various closely related taxa. These include the presence of budding limbs in snake embryos and the presence of budding teeth in the embryos of baleen whales.[7]

In addition, it has been found that there are deep homologies present in the very genomes of disparately related taxa, these genes are highly ancient, and determine growth patterns for many different taxa, demonstrating that structures once thought to be purely analogous turn out to be homologous to some extent after all.[8] These genes also demonstrate that the highly diverse range of eye morphology present in the animal kingdom come from a single common ancestor dating back many hundreds of millions of years, and that eye formation is dictated by one of these ancient genes, the gene in question being called Pax6 and its variants.[8]

## References[edit]

1. ↑ Owen, Richard (1843). Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate Animals, Delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans. pp. 374, 379.
2. ↑ Sommer, R. J. (July 2008). "Homology and the hierarchy of biological systems". BioEssays. 30 (7): 653–658\. PMID 18536034.653-658&rft.date=2008-07&rft_id=info:pmid/18536034&rft.aulast=Sommer&rft.aufirst=R.+J.&rfr_id=info:sid/rationalwiki.org:Homology" class="Z3988">
3. ↑ Wagner, Günter P. (2014). Homology, Genes, and Evolutionary Innovation. Princeton University Press. pp. 53–54\. ISBN 978-1-4008-5146-1. "elytra have very little similarity with typical wings, but are clearly homologous to forewings. Hence butterflies, flies, and beetles all have two pairs of dorsal appendages that are homologous among species."53-54&rft.pub=Princeton+University+Press&rft.date=2014&rft.isbn=978-1-4008-5146-1&rft.aulast=Wagner&rft.aufirst=Günter+P.&rft_id=https://books.google.com/books?id=g7vzAgAAQBAJ&pg;=PA53&rfr_id=info:sid/rationalwiki.org:Homology" class="Z3988">
4. ↑ Lipshitz, Howard D. (2012). Genes, Development and Cancer: The Life and Work of Edward B. Lewis. Springer. p. 240\. ISBN 978-1-4419-8981-9. "For example, wing and haltere are homologous, yet widely divergent, organs that normally arise as dorsal appendages of the second thoracic (T2) and third thoracic (T3) segments, respectively."
5. ↑ Scotland, R. W. (2010). "Deep homology: A view from systematics". BioEssays. 32 (5): 438–449\. PMID 20394064.438-449&rft.date=2010&rft_id=info:pmid/20394064&rft.aulast=Scotland&rft.aufirst=R.+W.&rfr_id=info:sid/rationalwiki.org:Homology" class="Z3988">
6. ↑ "Homologous and analogous structures: What's the difference?"
7. ↑ "Homologies: developmental biology". UC Berkeley. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Tomarev, Stanislav I.; Callaerts, Patrick; Kos, Lidia; Zinovieva, Rina; Halder, Georg; Gehring, Walter; Piatigorsky, Joram (1997). "Squid Pax-6 and eye development". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 94 (6): 2421–2426\. PMID 9122210.2421-2426&rft.date=1997&rft_id=info:pmid/9122210&rft.aulast=Tomarev&rft.aufirst=Stanislav+I.&rft.au=Callaerts,+Patrick&rft.au=Kos,+Lidia&rft.au=Zinovieva,+Rina&rft.au=Halder,+Georg&rft.au=Gehring,+Walter&rft.au=Piatigorsky,+Joram&rfr_id=info:sid/rationalwiki.org:Homology" class="Z3988">