Dan Wilson recall, Portola, California (2012)

* Recall efforts
* Recall efforts by state
* Recall efforts by office
* Recall efforts by year
* Upcoming recall elections
* Local recalls
* City council recalls
* Mayoral recalls
* County commission recalls
* County official recalls
* School board recalls
* Sheriff recalls
* Special district recalls
* State and federal recalls
* State executive recalls
* State legislator recalls
* U.S. Congress recalls
* Laws governing recall
* States that have pre-petition signature requirements for recalls
* States that require grounds for recalls
* Analysis
* What are recalls?
* Recall terms
* Analysis (2010-present)
* 2025 year-end analysis
* 2025 mid-year analysis
* 2024 year-end analysis
* 2024 mid-year analysis
* 2023 year-end analysis
* 2023 mid-year analysis
* 2022 year-end analysis
* 2022 mid-year analysis
* 2021 year-end analysis
* 2021 mid-year analysis
* 2020 year-end analysis
* 2020 mid-year analysis
* 2019 year-end analysis
* 2019 mid-year analysis
* 2018 year-end analysis
* 2018 mid-year analysis
* 2017 year-end analysis
* 2017 mid-year analysis
* 2016 year-end analysis
* 2016 mid-year analysis

Portola Mayor recall

Officeholders
Dan Wilson
Recall status
Recall approved
Recall election date
April 10, 2012
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2012
Recalls in California
California recall laws
Mayoral recalls
Recall reports

A vote about whether to recall Dan Wilson from his position as mayor of Portola, California, in Plumas County took place on April 10th, 2012.[1] Wilson was recalled by a margin of 7 votes.[2] The recall outcome was initially undetermined due to 16 uncounted ballots.[3] The recall effort was launched in August 2011.[4]

## Contents

* 1 Reasons for recall
* 2 Path to the ballot
* 3 Election results
* 4 See also
* 5 External links
* 6 Footnotes

## Reasons for recall[edit]

Recall supporters said that their motivation for going forward with the recall is the fact that Wilson voted in favor of water and sewer rate hikes in a July 2011 vote.

* Official grounds for circulating the recall petition:

“You have refused to consider the concerns of the people of Portola regarding the water and sewer rate hikes. You patronized the people, calling them ‘disgruntled citizens who refused to listen to facts or reason.’ You offered EPCAN food distribution as a viable and ongoing option for those hardest hit by the rate hikes. You have offered no other options or ideas, choosing instead to ignore the question of affordability. You thwarted the efforts of the ad hoc committee you formed, and used a technicality to bring the issue to vote without the foreknowledge of the people of Portola. Even after the vote, you refused any sort of compromise or show of good faith. You have failed to respond to the citizens’ needs and wishes and are refusing to work in their best interests, thus creating an atmosphere of mistrust that has permanently affected your ability to work productively for the city.”[5]

* Mayor Wilson's official response:

“I have not refused to consider the concerns of the people of Portola. On the contrary, my focus has been to make sure that all residents have a long-term, reliable, safe source for drinking water and a sewer system that will fit the needs for years to come. Budget cuts have been implemented, particularly in payroll, but state mandates continue to be an issue in increasing the costs of city government. Changes to the water rate structure and rates promote conservation and are responsive to the state of California green standards. I do not want to postpone the financial responsibility to future generations.As to the ad hoc committee, I did form it and I did disband it, as I did not think it was acting in the best interest of the citizens. I prefer that future discussions be heard by the entire City Council and taped for the public. I have no personal agenda. I have spent countless hours learning the reality of city government and the issues in providing water and sewer utilities. I have, and will continue to have, the best interest of the citizens in mind in all decisions, even the difficult ones.”[5]

## Path to the ballot[edit]

On August 5th, a group of citizens filed paperwork to notify the Portola City Clerk of their intent to circulate a recall petition.[4]

On October 13th, recall supporter Jeanne Rowden-Dansby turned in 364 signatures to the Portola City Clerk. 269 signatures from registered Portola voters are required to initiate a recall election. 309 signatures were found to be valid. At the December 14th City Council meeting, the date for a recall election was set.[1]

The recall election took place on April 10th, 2012. The ballot had two questions:

* 1) Do you wish to recall Dan Wilson from the City Council — yes or no?
* 2) In the event of a successful recall, which of these candidates do you wish as replacement?

Registered voters wishing to contend for Wilson's seat had the chance to file candidate paperwork between December 21st and January 12th.[1]

Three candidates challenged Wilson. They are John Gault, Phil Oels, and Mike Rush.[6]

## Election results[edit]

Wilson was recalled in the April 10th election.[2] He was replaced by Phil Oels.[3]

* Votes to recall Dan Wilson: 242 a
* Votes to retain Dan Wilson: 235

* Votes to replace Wilson with Phil Oels: 180 a
* Votes to replace Wilson with John Gault: 95
* Votes to replace with Mike Rush: 51

## See also[edit]

* Recall campaigns in California
* City council recalls
* Mayoral recalls
* Plumas County

## External links[edit]

* Website of the City of Portola

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Plumas News, "Special city election April 10 to determine recall," December 21, 2011 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; name "date" defined multiple times with different content
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Plumas News, "Portola votes to recall Wilson," April 11, 2012
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Plumas News, "Portola votes 231 to 230 to recall but 16 ballots remain uncounted," April 10, 2012
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Plumas News, "Citizens file intent to recall Mayor Wilson," August 7, 2011
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Plumas News, "Recall petition under discussion," August 24, 2011
6. ↑ Plumas News, "Candidates line up for recall election," February 8, 2012

Political recall elections

Recalls
by year

Upcoming recalls • 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • Historical recalls • Recall statistics and analysis

Recalls
by office

Governors • State legislators • County officials • County commission • Sheriffs • Mayors • City officials • City council • School board • Special district

Recalls
by state

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • District of Columbia • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Recall
laws

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • District of Columbia • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Kansas • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Rhode Island • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming • States that require grounds for recalls • States that have pre-petition signature requirements for recalls