Virtue ethics

Short description: Normative ethical theories

Virtue ethics (also aretaic ethics,[lower-alpha 1][1] from Greek ἀρετή [aretḗ]) is a philosophical approach that treats virtue and character as the primary subjects of ethics, in contrast to other ethical systems that put consequences of voluntary acts, principles or rules of conduct, or obedience to divine authority in the primary role.[2]

Virtue ethics is usually contrasted with two other major approaches in ethics, consequentialism and deontology, which make the goodness of outcomes of an action (consequentialism) and the concept of moral duty (deontology) central. While virtue ethics does not necessarily deny the importance to ethics of goodness of states of affairs or of moral duties, it emphasizes virtue and sometimes other concepts, like eudaimonia, to an extent that other ethics theories do not.

## Contents

* 1 Key concepts
* 1.1 Virtue and vice
* 1.2 Virtue and emotion
* 1.3 Phronesis and eudaimonia
* 2 History of virtue
* 2.1 Contemporary "aretaic turn"
* 3 Lists of virtues
* 3.1 Aristotle's list
* 3.1.1 Moral virtues
* 3.1.2 Intellectual virtues
* 4 Criticisms
* 4.1 Subsumed in deontology and utilitarianism
* 4.2 Kantian critique
* 4.3 Utopianism and pluralism
* 5 Topics in virtue ethics
* 5.1 Virtue ethics as a category
* 5.2 Virtue and politics
* 6 See also
* 7 Notes
* 8 References
* 8.1 Sources
* 9 Further reading
* 10 External links

## Key concepts

### Virtue and vice

Main articles: Philosophy:Virtue and Moral character

In virtue ethics, a virtue is a characteristic disposition to think, feel, and act well in some domain of life.[3] In contrast, a vice is a characteristic disposition to think, feel, and act poorly in some domain of life. Virtues are not everyday habits; they are character traits, in the sense that they are central to someone’s personality and what they are like as a person.

In early versions and some modern versions of virtue ethics, a virtue is defined as a character trait that promotes or exhibits human "flourishing and well being" in the person who exhibits it.[4] Some modern versions of virtue ethics do not define virtues in terms of well being or flourishing, and some go so far as to define virtues as traits that tend to promote some other good that is defined independently of the virtues, thereby subsuming virtue ethics under (or somehow merging it with) consequentialist ethics.[5]

To Aristotle, a virtue was not a skill that made you better able to achieve eudaimonia but was itself an expression of eudaimonia[6]

### Virtue and emotion

In ancient Greek and modern eudaimonic virtue ethics, virtues and vices are complex dispositions that involve both affective and intellectual components.[7] That is, they are dispositions that involve both being able to reason well about the right thing to do (see below on phronesis), and also to engage emotions and feelings correctly.

For example, a generous person can reason well about when and how to help people, and such a person also helps people with pleasure and without conflict. In this, virtuous people are contrasted not only with vicious people (who reason poorly about what to do and are emotionally attached to the wrong things) and with the incontinent (who are tempted by their feelings into doing the wrong thing even though they know what is right), but also with the merely continent (whose emotions tempt them toward doing the wrong thing but whose strength of will lets them do what they know is right).

According to Rosalind Hursthouse, in Aristotelian virtue ethics, the emotions have moral significance because "virtues (and vices) are all dispositions not only to act, but to feel emotions, as reactions as well as impulses to action... [and] In the person with the virtues, these emotions will be felt on the right occasions, toward the right people or objects, for the right reasons, where 'right' means 'correct'..."[8]

### Phronesis and eudaimonia

Phronesis (φρόνησις; prudence, practical virtue, or practical wisdom) is an acquired trait that enables its possessor to identify the best thing to do in any given situation.[9] Unlike theoretical wisdom, practical reason results in action or decision.[10] As John McDowell puts it, practical wisdom involves a "perceptual sensitivity" to what a situation requires.[11]

Eudaimonia (εὐδαιμονία) is a state variously translated from Greek as 'well-being', 'happiness', 'blessedness', and in the context of virtue ethics, 'human flourishing'.[12] Eudaimonia in this sense is not a subjective, but an objective, state. It characterizes the well-lived life.

According to Aristotle, the most prominent exponent of eudaimonia in the Western philosophical tradition, eudaimonia defines the goal of human life. It consists of exercising the characteristic human quality—reason—as the soul's most proper and nourishing activity. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle, like Plato before him, argued that the pursuit of eudaimonia is an "activity of the soul in accordance with perfect virtue",[13]: I which further could only properly be exercised in the characteristic human community—the polis or city-state.[14]

Although eudaimonia was first popularized by Aristotle, it now belongs to the tradition of virtue theories generally.[15] For the virtue theorist, eudaimonia describes that state achieved by the person who lives the proper human life, an outcome that can be reached by practicing the virtues. A virtue is a habit or quality that allows the bearer to succeed at his, her, or its purpose. The virtue of a knife, for example, is sharpness; among the virtues of a racehorse is speed. Thus, to identify the virtues for human beings, one must have an account of what is the human purpose.

Not all modern virtue ethics theories are eudaimonic; some propose another end in place of eudaimonia, while others are non-teleological: that is, they do not account for virtues in terms of the results that the practice of the virtues produce or tend to produce.[16]

## History of virtue

Like much of the Western tradition, virtue theory originated in ancient Greek philosophy.

Virtue ethics began with Socrates, and was subsequently developed further by Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics.[17] Virtue ethics concentrates on the character of the individual, rather than the acts (or consequences thereof) of the individual. There is debate among adherents of virtue ethics concerning what specific virtues are praiseworthy. However, most theorists agree that ethics is demonstrated by the practice of virtues.

Plato and Aristotle's treatments of virtues are not the same. Plato believes virtue is effectively an end to be sought, for which a friend might be a useful means. Aristotle states that the virtues function more as means to safeguard human relations, particularly authentic friendship, without which one's quest for happiness is frustrated.

Discussion of what were known as the four cardinal virtues—wisdom, justice, fortitude, and temperance—can be found in Plato's Republic. The virtues also figure prominently in Aristotle's ethical theory found in Nicomachean Ethics.[13]

Part of a series on
Catholic philosophy

Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham

Ethics

* Cardinal virtues
* Just price
* Just war
* Probabilism
* Natural law
* Personalism
* Social teaching
* Virtue ethics

Schools

* Augustinianism
* Cartesianism
* Molinism
* Occamism
* Salamanca
* Scholasticism
* Neo-scholasticism
* Scotism
* Thomism

Philosophers

Ancient

* Ambrose
* Athanasius the Great
* Augustine of Hippo
* Clement of Alexandria
* Cyprian of Carthage
* Cyril of Alexandria
* Gregory of Nyssa
* Irenaeus of Lyons
* Jerome
* John Chrysostom
* John of Damascus
* Justin Martyr
* Origen
* Paul the Apostle
* Tertullian

Postclassical

* Pseudo-Dionysius
* Boethius
* Isidore of Seville
* Scotus Eriugena
* Bede
* Anselm of Canterbury
* Hildegard of Bingen
* Peter Abelard
* Symeon the New Theologian
* Bernard of Clairvaux
* Hugh of Saint Victor
* Thomas Aquinas
* Benedict of Nursia
* Pope Gregory I
* Peter Lombard
* Bonaventure
* Albertus Magnus
* Duns Scotus
* Roger Bacon
* Giles of Rome
* James of Viterbo
* Giambattista Vico
* Gregory of Rimini
* William of Ockham
* Catherine of Siena
* Paul of Venice

Modern

* Baltasar Gracián
* Erasmus of Rotterdam
* Thomas Cajetan
* Nicholas of Cusa
* Luis de Molina
* Teresa of Ávila
* Thomas More
* Francis de Sales
* Francisco de Vitoria
* Domingo de Soto
* Martín de Azpilcueta
* Tomás de Mercado
* Antoine Arnauld
* René Descartes
* Robert Bellarmine
* Ignacy Krasicki
* Hugo Kołłątaj
* François Fénelon
* Alphonsus Liguori
* Nicolas Malebranche
* Blaise Pascal
* Francisco Suárez
* Giovanni Botero

Contemporary

* Pope Benedict XVI
* Pope John Paul II
* Mortimer J. Adler
* G. E. M. Anscombe
* Robert Barron
* Hans Urs von Balthasar
* G. K. Chesterton
* Yves Congar
* Edward Feser
* Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange
* Étienne Gilson
* René Girard
* Romano Guardini
* Dietrich von Hildebrand
* Faustina Kowalska
* Peter Kreeft
* Felicité de Lamennais
* Bernard Lonergan
* Marshall McLuhan
* Alasdair MacIntyre
* Gabriel Marcel
* Jacques Maritain
* Désiré Mercier
* Thomas Merton
* Oswald von Nell-Breuning
* John Henry Newman
* Erich Przywara
* Karl Rahner
* Antonio Rosmini
* Edith Stein
* Eleonore Stump
* Charles Taylor

* v
* t
* e

Part of a series on the
Catholic Church

St. Peter's Basilica, Vatican City

Overview

* Pope: Francis
* Hierarchy
* History (Timeline)
* Theology
* Liturgy
* Sacraments
* Mary

Background

* Jesus
* Crucifixion
* Resurrection
* Ascension
* Early Christianity
* Peter
* Paul
* Fathers
* History of the Catholic Church
* History of the papacy
* Ecumenical councils
* Magisterium
* Four Marks of the Church
* One true church
* Apostolic succession

Organisation

* Holy See
* Roman Curia
* College of Cardinals
* Ecumenical councils
* Episcopal polity
* Latin Church
* Eastern Churches
* Canon law

* Theologies
* Doctrine

God

* Trinity

* Father
* Son
* Holy Ghost

* Consubstantialitas
* Filioque
* Divinum illud munus
Divine Law

* Decalogus
* Ex Cathedra
* Deificatio

Realms beyond the States of the Church

* Heaven
* Purgatory
* Limbo
* Hell

Paschal mystery

* Passion of Jesus
* Crucifixion of Jesus
* Harrowing of Hell
* Resurrection
* Ascension

Blessed Virgin Mary

* Mariology
* Veneration
* Immaculate Conception
* Mater Dei
* Perpetual virginity
* Assumption
* Dormition
* Titles
* Queen
* Apparition
* Mediatrix

Salvation

* Baptism of desire
* Divine grace
* Outside the Church there is no salvation
* Infused righteousness
* Invincible ignorance
* Justification
* Means of grace
* Merit
* Mortal sin
* Satisfaction
* Moral influence
* Sanctification
* Synergism
* Venial sin

Ecclesiology

* College of Bishops
* Deposit of faith
* Infallibility of the Church
* Mystical Body of Christ
* Papal primacy
* People of God
* Perfect community
* Subsistit in

Other teachings

* Josephology
* Morality
* Body
* Lectures
* Sexuality
* Apologetics
* Amillennialism
* Original sin
* Hypostatic union
* Predestination
* Seven deadly sins
* Beatific vision
* Saints
* Dogma

Texts

* Bible

*     * Old Testament
* New Testament

* Official Bible

*     * Vulgate
* Sixtine Vulgate
* Sixto-Clementine Vulgate
* Nova Vulgata
* Peshitta

* Apostles' Creed
* Nicene Creed
* Athanasian Creed
* Catechism of the Catholic Church
* Papal bull
* Apostolic exhortation
* Epistula Encyclica

Philosophy

* Cardinal Virtues
* Just war
* Natural law
* Catholic ethics
* Personalism
* Probabilism
* Social teaching
* Philosophy of canon law
* Philosophers
* Virtue ethics

Schools

* Augustinianism
* Scholasticism
* Thomism
* Scotism
* Occamism
* Christian humanism
* Molinism
* Neo-scholasticism

Worship

* Liturgy
* Mass
* Divine Liturgy
* Holy Qurbana
* Divine Office
* Liturgical year

* Sacraments
* Baptism
* Penance
* Eucharist
* Confirmation
* Anointing of the Sick
* Matrimony
* Holy orders

* Prayer
* Devotions
* Bible
* Biblical canon

Rites

* Latin

* Roman
* Post-Vatican II
* Tridentine
* Anglican Use
* Zaire Use

* Gallican
* Ambrosian
* Braga
* Mozarabic

* Eastern

* Antiochene
* Maronite
* West Syriac
* Syro-Malankara

* Chaldean
* East Syriac
* Syro-Malabar

* Byzantine
* Armenian

* Alexandrian
* Ethiopic

Miscellaneous

* Antipopes
* Anti-Catholicism
* Criticism
* Deism/Pandeism
* Ecumenism
* Monasticism

Relations with:

* Islam
* Judaism
* Protestantism

Societal issues

* Art
* Evolution
* Health care
* HIV/AIDS
* Homosexuality
* Music
* Nazi Germany
* Politics (in the United States)
* Role in civilization
* Science
* Sex and gender roles
* Slavery
* the Age of Discovery

Links and resources

* Index
* Outline
* Glossary
* Category
* Media
* Templates
* WikiProject
* Book

* v
* t
* e

Virtue theory was inserted into the study of history by moralistic historians such as Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus. The Greek idea of the virtues was passed on in Roman philosophy through Cicero and later incorporated into Christian moral theology by Ambrose of Milan. During the scholastic period, the most comprehensive consideration of the virtues from a theological perspective was provided by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologiae and his Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics.[18]

After the Reformation, Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics continued to be the main authority for the discipline of ethics at Protestant universities until the late seventeenth century, with over fifty Protestant commentaries published on the Nicomachean Ethics before 1682.[19]

Though the tradition receded into the background of European philosophical thought in the next few centuries, the term "virtue" remained current during this period, and in fact appears prominently in the tradition of classical republicanism or classical liberalism. This tradition was prominent in the intellectual life of 16th-century Italy, as well as 17th- and 18th-century Britain and America. The term "virtue" appears frequently in the work of Tomás Fernández de Medrano, Niccolò Machiavelli, David Hume, the republicans of the English Civil War period, the 18th-century English Whigs, and the prominent figures among the Scottish Enlightenment and the American Founding Fathers.

### Contemporary "aretaic turn"

Although some Enlightenment philosophers (e.g. Hume) continued to emphasise the virtues, with the ascendancy of utilitarianism and deontological ethics, virtue theory moved to the margins of Western philosophy. The contemporary revival of virtue theory is frequently traced to the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe's 1958 essay "Modern Moral Philosophy".[20] Following this:

* In the 1976 paper "The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories", Michael Stocker summarises the main aretaic criticisms of deontological and consequentialist ethics.[21]
* Philosopher, psychologist, and encyclopedist Mortimer Adler appealed to Aristotelian ethics, and the virtue theory of happiness or eudaimonia throughout his published work.
* Philippa Foot published a collection of essays in 1978 entitled Virtues and Vices.[22]
* Alasdair MacIntyre made an effort to reconstruct a virtue-based theory in dialogue with the problems of modern and postmodern thought; his works include After Virtue , where he recommends Aristotle's account of the virtues, and Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry, where he recommends Thomism.[23]
* Paul Ricoeur accorded an important place to Aristotelian teleological ethics in his hermeneutical phenomenology of the subject, most notably in his book Oneself as Another.[24]
* Theologian Stanley Hauerwas found the language of virtue helpful in his own project.
* Richard Clyde Taylor argues for the restoration of classical virtues as the basis for morality in Virtue Ethics An Introduction (1991)[25][26]
* Roger Crisp and Michael Slote edited a collection of important essays titled Virtue Ethics.[27]
* Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen employed virtue theory in theorising the capability approach to international development.
* Julia Annas wrote The Morality of Happiness (1993).[28]
* Lawrence C. Becker identified current virtue theory with Greek Stoicism in A New Stoicism. (1998).[29]
* Rosalind Hursthouse published On Virtue Ethics (1999).[30]
* Psychologist Martin Seligman drew on classical virtue ethics in conceptualizing positive psychology.
* Psychologist Daniel Goleman opens his book on Emotional Intelligence with a challenge from Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.[31]
* Michael Sandel discusses Aristotelian ethics to support his ethical theory of justice in his book Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?

The aretaic turn in moral philosophy is paralleled by analogous developments in other philosophical disciplines. One of these is epistemology, where a distinctive virtue epistemology was developed by Linda Zagzebski and others. In political theory, there has been discussion of "virtue politics", and in legal theory, there is a small but growing body of literature on virtue jurisprudence. The aretaic turn also exists in American constitutional theory, where proponents argue for an emphasis on virtue and vice of constitutional adjudicators[clarification needed].[citation needed]

Aretaic approaches to morality, epistemology, and jurisprudence have been the subject of intense debates. One criticism focuses on the problem of guidance; one opponent, Robert Louden in his article "Some Vices of Virtue Ethics", questions whether the idea of a virtuous moral actor, believer, or judge can provide the guidance necessary for action, belief formation, or the resolution of legal disputes.[32]

## Lists of virtues

There are several lists of virtues. Socrates argued that virtue is knowledge, which suggests that there is really only one virtue.[33] The Stoics identified four cardinal virtues: wisdom, justice, courage, and temperance. Wisdom is subdivided into good sense, good calculation, quick-wittedness, discretion, and resourcefulness. Justice is subdivided into piety, honesty, equity, and fair dealing. Courage is subdivided into endurance, confidence, high-mindedness, cheerfulness, and industriousness. Temperance or moderation is subdivided into good discipline, seemliness, modesty, and self-control.[34]

John McDowell argues that virtue is a "perceptual capacity" to identify how one ought to act, and that all particular virtues are merely "specialized sensitivities" to a range of reasons for acting.[35]

### Aristotle's list

Aristotle identifies 12 virtues that demonstrate a person is performing their human function well.[13] He distinguished virtues pertaining to emotion and desire from those relating to the mind.[13]: II The first he calls moral virtues, and the second intellectual virtues (though both are "moral" in the modern sense of the word).

#### Moral virtues

Aristotle suggested that each moral virtue was a golden mean between two corresponding vices, one of excess and one of deficiency. Each intellectual virtue is a mental skill or habit by which the mind arrives at truth, affirming what is or denying what is not.[13]: VI In the Nicomachean Ethics. he discusses 11 moral virtues:

Dimension  | Excess  | Golden mean  | Deficiency

|
|
|

Fear and confidence  | Rashness  | Courage in the face of fear[13]: III.6–9 | Cowardice
Pleasure and pain  | Self-indulgence  | Temperance in the face of pleasure and pain[13]: III.10–12 | Insensibility
Getting and spending (minor)  | Prodigality  | Liberality with wealth and possessions[13]: IV.1 | Illiberality
Getting and spending (major)  | Vulgarity  | Magnificence with great wealth and possessions[13]: IV.2 | Pettiness
Honor and dishonor (major)  | Vanity  | Magnanimity with great honors[13]: IV.3 | Pusillanimity
Honor and dishonor (minor)  | Empty vanity  | Proper ambition with normal honors[13]: IV.4 | Unambitiousness
Anger  | Irascibility  | Patience[13]: IV.5 | Lack of spirit
Self-expression  | Boastfulness  | Honesty with self-expression[13]: IV.7 | False modesty
Conversation  | Buffoonery  | Wittiness in conversation[13]: IV.8 | Boorishness
Social conduct  | Obsequiousness  | Friendliness in social conduct[13]: IV.6 | Cantankerousness
Indignation  | Envy  | Justice and righteous indignation in the face of injury[13]: IV.5 | Spitefulness

#### Intellectual virtues

1. Nous (intelligence), which apprehends fundamental truths (such as definitions, self-evident principles)[13]: VI.11
2. Episteme (science), which is skill with inferential reasoning (such as proofs, syllogisms, demonstrations)[13]: VI.6
3. Sophia (theoretical wisdom), which combines fundamental truths with valid, necessary inferences to reason well about unchanging truths.[13]: VI.5

Aristotle also mentions several other traits:

* Gnome (good sense) – passing judgment, "sympathetic understanding"[13]: VI.11
* Synesis (understanding) – comprehending what others say, does not issue commands
* Phronesis (practical wisdom) – knowledge of what to do, knowledge of changing truths, issues commands[13]: VI.8
* Techne (art, craftsmanship)[13]: VI.4

Aristotle's list is not the only list, however. As Alasdair MacIntyre observed in After Virtue, thinkers as diverse as Homer, the authors of the New Testament, Thomas Aquinas, and Benjamin Franklin have all proposed lists.[36] Walter Kaufmann proposed as the four cardinal virtues: ambition/humility ("humbition"), love, courage, and honesty.[37]

## Criticisms

Proponents of virtue theory[who?] sometimes argue that a central feature of a virtue is its universal applicability. In other words, any character trait defined as a virtue must reasonably be universally regarded as a virtue for all people. According to this view, it is inconsistent to claim, for example, servility as a female virtue, while at the same time not proposing it as a male one.[38]

Other proponents of virtue theory, notably Alasdair MacIntyre, respond to this objection by arguing that any account of the virtues must indeed be generated out of the community in which those virtues are to be practiced: the very word ethics implies ethos. That is to say that the virtues are, and necessarily must be, grounded in a particular time and place. What counts as a virtue in 4th-century BCE Athens would be a ludicrous guide to proper behaviour in 21st-century CE Toronto and vice versa. To take this view does not necessarily commit one to the argument that accounts of the virtues must therefore be static: moral activity—that is, attempts to contemplate and practice the virtues—can provide the cultural resources that allow people to change, albeit slowly, the ethos of their own societies.

MacIntyre appears to take this position in his seminal work on virtue ethics, After Virtue.

Another objection[whose?] to virtue theory is that virtue ethics does not focus on what sorts of actions are morally permitted and which ones are not, but rather on what sort of qualities someone ought to foster in order to become a good person. In other words, while some virtue theorists[who?] may not condemn, for example, murder as an inherently immoral or impermissible sort of action, they may argue that someone who commits a murder is severely lacking in several important virtues, such as compassion and fairness. Still, antagonists of the theory[who?] often object that this particular feature of the theory makes virtue ethics useless as a universal norm of acceptable conduct suitable as a base for legislation . Some virtue theorists[who?] concede this point, but respond by opposing the very notion of legitimate legislative authority instead, effectively advocating some form of anarchism as the political ideal.[citation needed] uly 2024}} argue that laws should be made by virtuous legislators, and still another group argue that it is possible to base a judicial system on the moral notion of virtues rather than rules. Aristotle himself saw his Nicomachean Ethics as a prequel for his Politics and felt that the point of politics was to create the fertile soil for a virtuous citizenry to develop in, and that one purpose of virtue was that it helps you to contribute to a healthy polis.[13]: X.9 [14]

Some virtue theorists[who?] might respond to this overall objection with the notion of a "bad act" also being an act characteristic of vice. That is to say that those acts that do not aim at virtue, or that stray from virtue, would constitute our conception of "bad behavior". Although not all virtue ethicists agree to this notion, this is one way the virtue ethicist can re-introduce the concept of the "morally impermissible". One could raise an objection that he is committing an argument from ignorance by postulating that what is not virtuous is unvirtuous. In other words, just because an action or person 'lacks of evidence' for virtue does not, all else constant, imply that said action or person is unvirtuous.

### Subsumed in deontology and utilitarianism

Martha Nussbaum suggested that while virtue ethics is often considered to be anti-Enlightenment, "suspicious of theory and respectful of the wisdom embodied in local practices",[39] it is actually neither fundamentally distinct from, nor does it qualify as a rival approach to deontology and utilitarianism. She argues that philosophers from these two Enlightenment traditions often include theories of virtue. She pointed out that Kant's "Doctrine of Virtue" (in The Metaphysics of Morals) "covers most of the same topics as do classical Greek theories", "that he offers a general account of virtue, in terms of the strength of the will in overcoming wayward and selfish inclinations; that he offers detailed analyses of standard virtues such as courage and self-control, and of vices, such as avarice, mendacity, servility, and pride; that, although in general, he portrays inclination as inimical to virtue, he also recognizes that sympathetic inclinations offer crucial support to virtue, and urges their deliberate cultivation."[39]

Nussbaum also points to considerations of virtue by utilitarians such as Henry Sidgwick (The Methods of Ethics), Jeremy Bentham (The Principles of Morals and Legislation), and John Stuart Mill, who writes of moral development as part of an argument for the moral equality of women (The Subjection of Women). She argues that contemporary virtue ethicists such as Alasdair MacIntyre, Bernard Williams, Philippa Foot, and John McDowell have few points of agreement and that the common core of their work does not represent a break from Kant.

### Kantian critique

Immanuel Kant's position on virtue ethics is contested. Those who argue that Kantian deontology conflicts with virtue ethics include Alasdair MacIntyre, Philippa Foot, and Bernard Williams.[40] In the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Critique of Practical Reason, Immanuel Kant offers many different criticisms of ethical frameworks and against moral theories before him. Kant rarely mentioned Aristotle by name but did not exclude his moral philosophy of virtue ethics from his critique. Many Kantian arguments against virtue ethics claim that virtue ethics is inconsistent, or sometimes that it is not a real moral theory at all.[41]

In "What Is Virtue Ethics All About?",[42] Gregory Velazco y Trianosky identified the key points of divergence between virtue ethicists and what he called "neo-Kantianism", in the form these nine neo-Kantian moral assertions:

1. The crucial moral question is "what is it right/obligatory to do?"
2. Moral judgments are those that concern the rightness of actions.
3. Such judgments take the form of rules or principles.
4. Such rules or principles are universal, not respecting persons.
5. They are not based on some concept of human good that is independent of moral goodness.
6. They take the form of categorical imperatives that can be justified independently of the desires of the person they apply to.
7. They are motivating; they can compel action in an agent, also independently of that agent's desires.
8. An action, in order to be morally virtuous, must be motivated by this sort of moral judgment (not, for example, merely coincidentally aligned with it).
9. The virtuousness of a character trait, or virtue, derives from the relationship that trait has to moral judgments, rules, and principles.

Trianosky says that modern sympathizers with virtue ethics almost all reject neo-Kantian claim #1, and many of them also reject certain of the other claims.

### Utopianism and pluralism

Robert B. Louden criticizes virtue ethics on the basis that it promotes a form of unsustainable utopianism. Trying to arrive at a single set of virtues is immensely difficult in contemporary societies as, according to Louden, they contain "more ethnic, religious, and class groups than did the moral community which Aristotle theorized about" with each of these groups having "not only its own interests but its own set of virtues as well". Louden notes in passing that MacIntyre, a supporter of virtue-based ethics, has grappled with this in After Virtue but that ethics cannot dispense with building rules around acts and rely only on discussing the moral character of persons.[43]

## Topics in virtue ethics

### Virtue ethics as a category

Virtue contrasts with deontological and consequentialist ethics; the three are the most predominant contemporary normative-ethical theories. Deontological ethics, sometimes referred to as duty ethics, emphasizes adherence to ethical principles or duties. How these duties are defined, however, is often a subject of debate. One rule scheme used by deontologists is divine command theory. Deontology also depends upon meta-ethical realism in postulating the existence of moral absolutes, regardless of circumstances. Immanuel Kant is considered a foremost theorist of deontological ethics.

The next predominant school of thought in normative ethics is consequentialism. While deontology emphasizes doing one's duty, consequentialism bases the morality of an action on its outcome. Instead of saying that one has a moral duty to abstain from murder, a consequentialist would say that we should abstain from murder because it has undesirable effects. The main contention is what outcomes should (or can) be identified as objectively desirable.

John Stuart Mill's greatest happiness principle is a commonly-adopted criterion of what is objectively desirable. Mill asserts that the desirability of an action is the net amount of happiness it brings, the number of people it brings happiness to, and the duration of that happiness. He tries to delineate classes of happiness, some preferable to others, but classifying such a concept is difficult.

A virtue ethicist identifies virtues (also known as desirable characteristics) that a good person embodies. Exhibiting these virtues is the aim of ethics, and one's actions are a reflection of one's virtues. To the virtue philosopher, action cannot be used as a demarcation of morality because a virtue encompasses more than a selection of an action; it is a way of being that leads the person exhibiting the virtue to consistently make certain types of choices. There is disagreement in virtue ethics about what are, and what are not, virtues. There are also difficulties in identifying the "virtuous" action to take in all circumstances, and how to define a virtue.

Consequentialist and deontological theories often still employ the term virtue in a restricted sense: as a tendency (or disposition) to adhere to the system's principles or rules. In those theories, virtue is secondary and the principles (or rules) are primary. These differing senses of what constitutes virtue are a potential source of confusion.[44] Dogmatic claims about the purpose of human life, or about what a good life is for human beings, are typically controversial.

### Virtue and politics

Virtue theory emphasizes Aristotle's belief in the polis as the acme of political organization,[citation needed] and the role of the virtues in enabling human beings to flourish in that environment. In contrast, classical republicanism emphasizes Tacitus's concern that power and luxury can corrupt individuals and destroy liberty, as Tacitus perceived in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. Virtue for classical republicans is a shield against this sort of corruption and a means to preserve the good life one has, rather than a means by which to achieve the good life one does not yet have. Another way to put the distinction between the two traditions is that virtue ethics relies on Aristotle's fundamental distinction between the human-being-as-he-is from the human-being-as-he-should-be, while classical republicanism relies on the Tacitean distinction of the risk-of-becoming.[45]

Virtue ethics has a number of contemporary applications:

Social and political philosophy

Within the field of social ethics, Deirdre McCloskey argues that virtue ethics can provide a basis for a balanced approach to understanding capitalism and capitalist societies.[46][47]

Education

Within the field of philosophy of education, James Page argues that virtue ethics can provide a rationale and foundation for peace education.[48]

Health care and medical ethics

Thomas Alured Faunce argued that whistleblowing in healthcare settings would be more respected within clinical governance pathways if it had a firmer academic foundation in virtue ethics.[49] He called for whistleblowing to be expressly supported in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.[50] Barry Schwartz argues that "practical wisdom" is an antidote to much of the inefficient and inhumane bureaucracy of modern health care systems.[51]

Technology and the virtues

In her book Technology and the Virtues,[52] Shannon Vallor proposed a series of "technomoral" virtues that people need to cultivate in order to flourish in our socio-technological world: honesty (respecting truth), self-control (becoming the author of our desires), humility (knowing what we do not know), justice (upholding rightness), courage (intelligent fear and hope), empathy (compassionate concern for others), care (loving service to others), civility (making common cause), flexibility (skillful adaptation to change), perspective (holding on to the moral whole), and magnanimity (moral leadership and nobility of spirit).

## See also

## Notes

1. ↑ Pronounced /ˌærəˈteɪ.ɪk/.

## References

1. ↑ Virtue Ethics and Moral Education. Routledge. 1999. p. 22. ISBN 9780415170734.
2. ↑ Statman, Daniel (1997). "Introduction to Virtue Ethics". Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 7. ISBN 0878402217. "[Virtue Ethics] refers to a rather new (or renewed) approach to ethics, according to which the basic judgments in ethics are judgments about character."
3. ↑
4. ↑ Statman, Daniel (1997). "Introduction to Virtue Ethics". Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 8. ISBN 0878402217. "Virtues are viewed as necessary conditions for, or as constitutive elements of, human flourishing and wellbeing."
5. ↑ Trianosky, Gregory Velazco y (1997). "What is Virtue Ethics All About?". in Statman, Daniel. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 48. ISBN 0878402217. "What is surprising today is how many of the most influential writers on the virtues today in fact defend some sort of teleological if not specifically utilitarian answer."
6. ↑ Trianosky, Gregory Velazco y (1997). "What is Virtue Ethics All About?". in Statman, Daniel. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 47. ISBN 0878402217. "[Aristotle regards virtue as] a constitutive element of the human good rather than merely a means to its attainment."
7. ↑ Annas, Julia (1993). The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN 0-19-507999-X.
8. ↑ Hursthouse, Rosalind (1997). "Virtue Ethics and the Emotions". in Statman, Daniel. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 108. ISBN 0878402217.
9. ↑ Pincoffs, Edmund (1971). "Quandary ethics". Mind 80 (320): 552–571. doi:10.1093/mind/LXXX.320.552.
10. ↑ Kraut, Richard (2016-01-01). Zalta, Edward N.. ed. Aristotle's Ethics (Spring 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/aristotle-ethics/. Retrieved 2016-05-05.
11. ↑ McDowell, John (1979). "Virtue and Reason". The Monist 62 (3): 331–350. doi:10.5840/monist197962319.
12. ↑ Pojman, L.P.; Fieser, J. (2009). "Virtue Theory". Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong (6th ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth. pp. 146–169.
13. ↑ 13.00 13.01 13.02 13.03 13.04 13.05 13.06 13.07 13.08 13.09 13.10 13.11 13.12 13.13 13.14 13.15 13.16 13.17 13.18 13.19 13.20 13.21 13.22 Dubey, Damayanti (December 31, 2021). "12 Virtues of Aristotle". https://evolveinc.io/self-improvement/12-virtues-of-aristotle/#:~:text=Aristotle, in his Nicomachean Ethics, lists the following 12 virtues.
14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Aristotle. Politics.
15. ↑ Hursthouse, Rosalind (8 Dec 2016). "Virtue Ethics". Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/#Prel. "Although modern virtue ethics does not have to take a 'neo-Aristotelian' or eudaimonist form..., almost any modern version still shows that its roots are in ancient Greek philosophy by the employment of three concepts derived from it. These are arête (excellence or virtue), phronesis (practical or moral wisdom) and eudaimonia (usually translated as happiness or flourishing)."
16. ↑ Statman, Daniel (1997). "Introduction to Virtue Ethics". Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 11. ISBN 0878402217. "[I]t is important to notice (1.) that virtue ethics is not necessarily tied to the notion of wellbeing; and (2.) that according to some philosophers, virtue ethics is necessarily, or at least typically, of a non-teleological nature."
17. ↑

* Gardiner, P. (2003-10-01). "A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine" (in en). Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5): 297–302. doi:10.1136/jme.29.5.297. ISSN 0306-6800. PMID 14519840. PMC 1733793. https://jme.bmj.com/content/29/5/297.
* Bowin, John (2020). "Aristotle's Virtue Ethics". in Seigneurie, Ken. A Companion to World Literature. John Wiley & Sons. https://people.ucsc.edu/~jbowin/virtue.pdf.
* Plato: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press, USA. 2010. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-19-980902-8.

18. ↑

* Aquinas, Thomas (1485). Summa Theologica.
* Aquinas, Thomas (1272). Commentary on the Ten Books of Ethics.

19. ↑ Sytsma, David (2021). "Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Protestantism" (in en). Academia Letters 1650: 1–8. doi:10.20935/AL1650. https://philarchive.org/rec/SYTANE.
20. ↑ Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). "Modern Moral Philosophy". Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19. doi:10.1017/s0031819100037943.
21. ↑ Stocker, Michael (1976). "The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories". The Journal of Philosophy 73 (14): 453–466. doi:10.2307/2025782.
22. ↑ Foot, Philippa (1978). Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. ISBN 0631127496. https://archive.org/details/virtuesvices0000unse_l8l3.
23. ↑

* MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. ISBN 0-268-00594-X. https://archive.org/details/aftervirtue0000unse.
* MacIntyre, Alasdair (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. ISBN 0-268-01877-4. https://archive.org/details/threerivalversio0000maci_w3q5.

24. ↑ Ricoeur, Paul (1992). Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-71329-6. https://archive.org/details/oneselfasanother0000ricu.
25. ↑ Taylor, Richard (2002). Virtue Ethics An Introduction. New York: Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781573929431. https://books.google.com/books?id=FnTJ8p2YhWAC.
26. ↑ Virtue Ethics an Introduction.Taylor, Richard. Promethious Books, New York, 2002, See Foreword by John Donnelly, University of San Diego p. xiii-xiv, isbn 1-57392-943-3 on Google Books
27. ↑ Crisp, Roger; Slote, Michael (1997). Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. ↑ Annas, Julia (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509652-5. https://archive.org/details/moralityofhappin0000anna.
29. ↑ Becker, Lawrence C. (1998). A New Stoicism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-0691009643. https://archive.org/details/newstoicism0000beck.
30. ↑ Hursthouse, Rosalind (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-924799-4. https://archive.org/details/onvirtueethics00hurs.
31. ↑ Goleman, Daniel (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Aristotle's Challenge, pp. xix–xxiv: Bantam Books. ISBN 978-0-553-38371-3.
32. ↑ Louden, Robert B. (1984). "On some vices of virtue ethics". American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (3): 227–236.
33. ↑ Plato, Meno.
34. ↑

* Stephens, William O.. "Stoic Ethics". https://iep.utm.edu/stoiceth/.
* Cicero, Marcus Tullius. "De Officiis". https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/cicero-on-moral-duties-de-officiis.

35. ↑ McDowell, John (1979). "Virtue and reason". The Monist 62 (3): 331–350. doi:10.5840/monist197962319.
36. ↑ MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Chapter 14. ISBN 0-268-00594-X. https://archive.org/details/aftervirtue0000unse.
37. ↑ Kaufmann, Walter (1961). The Faith Of A Heretic. Doubleday & Co.. pp. 317–338. doi:10.1515/9781400866168-013. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400866168-013/html.
38. ↑ Rachels, James, Stuart (2023) (in en-us). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (10th ed.). McGraw Hill LLC. pp. 169–184. ISBN 978-1-265-23718-9.
39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 Nussbaum, Martha C. (1999). "Virtue Ethics: A Misleading Category?". The Journal of Ethics 3 (3): 163–201. doi:10.1023/A:1009877217694.
40. ↑ MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 42, 112. ISBN 0-268-00594-X. https://archive.org/details/aftervirtue0000unse.
41. ↑ Sullivan, Roger J. (1974). "The Kantian Critique of Aristotle's Moral Philosophy: An Appraisal". The Review of Metaphysics 28 (1): 24–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20126582.
42. ↑ Trianosky, Gregory Velazco y (1997). "What is Virtue Ethics All About?". in Statman, Daniel. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 47–55. ISBN 0878402217.
43. ↑ Louden, Robert B. (July 1984). "On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics". American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (3): 227–236.
44. ↑ Statman, Daniel (1997). "Introduction to Virtue Ethics". Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. p. 7. ISBN 0878402217. "[A] view shared by both deontologists and utilitarians... [is that] the value of character traits is dependent on the value of the conduct that these traits tend to produce, and it is the concept of right behavior that it theoretically prior, not that of virtue. In reversing the order of justification, virtue ethics is calling for a real revolution in ethical thought..."
45. ↑ Pocock, J.G.A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-11472-2.
46. ↑ McCloskey, Deirdre N. (2007). The Bourgeois Virtues. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-55664-2.
47. ↑ McCloskey, Deirdre N. (2015). "Bourgeois Virtue". Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom020101. ISBN 9781118785317.
48. ↑ Page, James; Page, James Smith (2008). Peace Education: Exploring Ethical and Philosophical Foundations. Information Age Pub Incorporated. ISBN 978-1-59311-889-1.
49. ↑

* Faunce, T.A. (2004). "Developing and Teaching the Virtue-Ethics Foundations of Healthcare Whistle Blowing". Monash Bioethics Review 23 (4): 41–55. doi:10.1007/BF03351419. PMID 15688511.
* Faunce, T.A.; Jefferys, S. (2007). "Whistleblowing and Scientific Misconduct: Renewing Legal and Virtue Ethics Foundations". Journal of Medicine and Law 26 (3): 567–584. PMID 17970253.

50. ↑ Faunce, T. A.; Nasu, H. (23 April 2009). "Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (Oxford University Press (OUP)) 34 (3): 296–321. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhp021. ISSN 0360-5310. PMID 19395367.
51. ↑ Schwartz, Barry (16 February 2009). "Our loss of wisdom". https://www.ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_our_loss_of_wisdom?language=en.
52. ↑ Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. 2016. ISBN 978-0190498511.

### Sources

* Statman, Daniel (1997). Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 0878402217.

## Further reading

* Yu, Jiyuan (1998). "Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle". Philosophy East and West 48 (2): 323–47. doi:10.2307/1399830. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1399830.
* Devettere, Raymond J. (2002). Introduction to Virtue Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 9780878403721.
* Taylor, Richard (2002). An Introduction to Virtue Ethics. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
* Darwall, Stephen, ed (2003). Virtue Ethics. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
* Swanton, Christine (2003). Virtue Ethics: a Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
* Gardiner, Stephen M., ed (2005). Virtue Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
* Russell, Daniel C., ed (2013). The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

## External links

* "Virtue Ethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/virtue.
* Hursthouse, Rosalind. "Virtue Ethics". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/.
* Homiak, Marcia. "Moral Character". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-character/.
* Virtue Ethics – summary, criticisms and how to apply the theory
* Legal theory lexicon: Virtue ethics by Larry Solum.
* The Virtue Ethics Research Hub
* The Four Stoic Virtues

* v
* t
* e

Aristotelianism

Overview|

* Aristotle
* Lyceum
* Peripatetic school
* Physics
* Biology
* Ethics
* Logic
* Theology (unmoved mover)

Ideas and interests|

* Active intellect
* Antiperistasis
* Arete
* Category of being
* Catharsis
* Correspondence theory of truth
* Essence–accident
* Eudaimonia
* Four causes
* Future contingents
* Genus–differentia
* Hexis
* Hylomorphism
* Ignoratio elenchi
* Magnanimity
* Mimesis
* Minima naturalia
* Moderate realism
* [[Philosophy:Aristotle's theory of universaAristotle's theory of universals (Philosophy:Substantial form|substantial form]])
* Mythos
* Philosophy of nature (sublunary sphere)
* Philia
* Plenism
* Rational animal
* Phronesis
* Potentiality and actuality
* Sensus communis
* Substance theory (hypokeimenon, ousia)
* Syllogism
* Telos
* Temporal finitism
* To ti en einai/to ti esti
* Use value/exchange value
* Virtue ethics

Corpus Aristotelicum|

* Physics
* Organon
* Nicomachean Ethics
* Politics
* Metaphysics
* On the Soul
* Rhetoric
* Poetics

Followers|

* Alexander the Great

| Lyceum|

* Aristoxenus
* Clearchus of Soli
* Dicaearchus
* Eudemus of Rhodes
* Theophrastus
* Strato of Lampsacus
* Lyco of Troas
* Aristo of Ceos
* Critolaus
* Diodorus of Tyre
* Erymneus
* Andronicus of Rhodes

|

Islamic Golden Age|

* Al-Kindi
* Avicenna
* Averroes

|

Jewish|

* Maimonides

|

Scholastics|

* Peter Lombard
* Albertus Magnus
* Thomas Aquinas
* Duns Scotus
* Peter of Spain

|

* Jacopo Zabarella
* Pietro Pomponazzi
* Cesar Cremonini

Modern|

* Newman
* Trendelenburg
* Brentano
* Adler
* Foot
* MacIntyre
* Hursthouse
* Nussbaum

|

Related topics|

* Platonism
* Commentaries on Aristotle
* Recovery of Aristotle
* Scholasticism
* Thomism
* Conimbricenses
* Pseudo-Aristotle
* Views on women
* Aristotle's wheel paradox
* Aristotle's razor

Related categories|

Category Aristotle not found

* v
* t
* e

Seven virtues in Christian ethics

Four
cardinal virtues|

* Prudence (Prudentia)
* Justice (Iustitia)
* Fortitude (Fortitudo)
* Temperance (Temperantia)

* Sources: Plato
* Republic, Book IV
* Cicero
* Ambrose
* Augustine of Hippo
* Thomas Aquinas

Faith, Hope and Love, as portrayed by Mary Lizzie Macomber (1861–1916)

Three
theological virtues|

* Faith (Fides)
* Hope (Spes)
* Love (Caritas)

* Sources: Paul the Apostle
* 1 Corinthians 13

Seven deadly sins|

* Lust (Luxuria)
* Gluttony (Gula)
* Greed (Avaritia)
* Sloth (Acedia)
* Wrath (Ira)
* Envy (Invidia)
* Pride (Superbia)

* Source: Prudentius, Psychomachia

* People: Evagrius Ponticus
* John Cassian
* Pope Gregory I
* Dante Alighieri
* Peter Binsfeld

Related concepts|

* Ten Commandments
* Great Commandment
* Eschatology
* Sin
* Original sin
* Old Covenant
* Hamartiology

* Christian philosophy

* v
* t
* e

Ethics

Theories|

* Casuistry
* Consequentialism
* Deontology
* Kantian ethics
* Ethics of care
* Existentialist ethics
* Meta-ethics
* Particularism
* Pragmatic ethics
* Role ethics
* Virtue ethics

Concepts|

* Autonomy
* Axiology
* Belief
* Conscience
* Consent
* Equality
* Care
* Free will
* Good and evil
* Good
* Evil
* Happiness
* Ideal
* Immorality
* Justice
* Liberty
* Morality
* Norm
* Freedom
* Principles
* Suffering or Pain
* Stewardship
* Sympathy
* Trust
* Value
* Virtue
* World view
* Wrong
* full index...

Philosophers|

* Laozi
* Socrates
* Plato
* Aristotle
* Diogenes
* Valluvar
* Cicero
* Confucius
* Augustine of Hippo
* Mencius
* Mozi
* Xunzi
* Thomas Aquinas
* Baruch Spinoza
* David Hume
* Immanuel Kant
* Georg W. F. Hegel
* Arthur Schopenhauer
* Jeremy Bentham
* John Stuart Mill
* Søren Kierkegaard
* Henry Sidgwick
* Friedrich Nietzsche
* G. E. Moore
* Karl Barth
* Paul Tillich
* Dietrich Bonhoeffer
* Philippa Foot
* John Rawls
* John Dewey
* Bernard Williams
* J. L. Mackie
* G. E. M. Anscombe
* William Frankena
* Alasdair MacIntyre
* R. M. Hare
* Peter Singer
* Derek Parfit
* Thomas Nagel
* Robert Merrihew Adams
* Charles Taylor
* Joxe Azurmendi
* Christine Korsgaard
* Martha Nussbaum
* more...

Applied ethics|

* Bioethics
* Business ethics
* Discourse ethics
* Engineering ethics
* Environmental ethics
* Legal ethics
* Media ethics
* Medical ethics
* Nursing ethics
* Professional ethics
* Sexual ethics
* Ethics of eating meat
* Ethics of technology

Meta-ethics|

* Cognitivism
* Moral realism
* Ethical naturalism
* Ethical non-naturalism
* Ethical subjectivism
* Ideal observer theory
* Divine command theory
* Error theory
* Non-cognitivism
* Emotivism
* Quasi-realism
* Universal prescriptivism
* Moral universalism
* Value monism
* Value pluralism
* Moral relativism
* Moral nihilism
* Empiricism
* Moral rationalism
* Ethical intuitionism
* Moral skepticism

Related articles|

* Christian ethics
* Descriptive ethics
* Ethics in religion
* Evolutionary ethics
* Feminist ethics
* History of ethics
* Ideology
* Islamic ethics
* Jewish ethics
* Moral psychology
* Normative ethics
* Philosophy of law
* Political philosophy
* Population ethics
* Social philosophy

* Category

* v
* t
* e

Philosophy

Branches

| Traditional|

* Metaphysics
* Ontology
* Epistemology
* Logic
* Ethics
* Aesthetics

|

Philosophy of|

* Action
* Art
* Culture
* Design
* Music
* Film
* Business
* Color
* Cosmos
* Dialogue
* Education
* Environment
* Futility
* Happiness
* Healthcare
* History
* Human nature
* Humor
* Feminism
* Language
* Life
* Literature
* Mathematics
* Mind
* Pain
* Psychology
* Philosophy of psychiatry
* Philosophy of perception
* Philosophy
* Religion
* Science
* Physics
* Chemistry
* Biology
* Geography
* Sexuality
* Social science
* Culture
* Economics
* Justice
* Law
* Politics
* Society
* Space and time
* Sport
* Technology
* Artificial intelligence
* Computer science
* Engineering
* Information
* War

Schools of thought

| By era|

* Ancient
* Western
* Medieval
* Renaissance
* Early modern
* Modern
* Contemporary

|

Ancient|

| Chinese|

* Agriculturalism
* Confucianism
* Legalism
* Logicians
* Mohism
* Chinese naturalism
* Neotaoism
* Taoism
* Yangism
* Chan

|

[[Philosophy:Ancient Greek philosopGreco-Hellenistic philosophy|Roman]] |

* Aristotelianism
* Atomism
* Cynicism
* Cyrenaics
* Eleatics
* Eretrian school
* Epicureanism
* Hermeneutics
* Ionian
* Ephesian
* Milesian
* Megarian school
* Neoplatonism
* Peripatetic
* Platonism
* Pluralism
* Presocratic
* Pyrrhonism
* Pythagoreanism
* Neopythagoreanism
* Sophistic
* Stoicism

Indian|

* Hindu
* Samkhya
* Nyaya
* Vaisheshika
* Yoga
* Mīmāṃsā
* Ājīvika
* Ajñana
* Cārvāka
* Jain
* Anekantavada
* Syādvāda
* Buddhist
* Śūnyatā
* Madhyamaka
* Yogacara
* Sautrāntika
* Svatantrika

Persian|

* Mazdakism
* Mithraism
* Zoroastrianism
* Zurvanism

Medieval|

| European|

* Christian
* Augustinianism
* Scholasticism
* Thomism
* Scotism
* Occamism
* Renaissance humanism

|

East Asian|

* Korean Confucianism
* Edo neo-Confucianism
* Neo-Confucianism

Indian|

* Vedanta
* Acintya bheda abheda
* Advaita
* Bhedabheda
* Dvaita
* Nimbarka Sampradaya
* Shuddhadvaita
* Vishishtadvaita
* Navya-Nyāya

Islamic|

* Averroism
* Avicennism
* Illuminationism
* ʿIlm al-Kalām
* Sufi

Jewish|

* Judeo-Islamic

Modern|

| People|

* Cartesianism
* Kantianism
* Neo-Kantianism
* Hegelianism
* Marxism
* Spinozism

|

* Anarchism
* Classical Realism
* Liberalism
* Collectivism
* Conservatism
* Determinism
* Dualism
* Empiricism
* Existentialism
* Foundationalism
* Historicism
* Holism
* Humanism
* Anti-
* Idealism
* Absolute
* British
* German
* Objective
* Subjective
* Transcendental
* Individualism
* Kokugaku
* Materialism
* Modernism
* Monism
* Naturalism
* Natural law
* Nihilism
* New Confucianism
* Neo-scholasticism
* Pragmatism
* Phenomenology
* Positivism
* Reductionism
* Rationalism
* Social contract
* Socialism
* Transcendentalism
* Utilitarianism

Contemporary|

| Analytic|

* Applied ethics
* Analytic feminism
* Analytical Marxism
* Communitarianism
* Consequentialism
* Critical rationalism
* Experimental philosophy
* Falsificationism
* Foundationalism / Coherentism
* Generative linguistics
* Internalism and externalism
* Logical positivism
* Legal positivism
* Normative ethics
* Meta-ethics
* Moral realism
* Quinean naturalism
* Ordinary language philosophy
* Postanalytic philosophy
* Quietism
* Rawlsian
* Reformed epistemology
* Systemics
* Scientism
* Scientific realism
* Scientific skepticism
* Transactionalism
* Contemporary utilitarianism
* Vienna Circle
* Wittgensteinian

|

Continental|

* Critical theory
* Deconstruction
* Existentialism
* Feminist
* Frankfurt School
* New Historicism
* Hermeneutics
* Neo-Marxism
* Phenomenology
* Posthumanism
* Postmodernism
* Post-structuralism
* Social constructionism
* Structuralism
* Western Marxism

Other|

* Kyoto School
* Objectivism
* Postcritique
* Russian cosmism
* more...

Positions

| Aesthetics|

* Formalism
* Institutionalism
* Aesthetic response

|

Ethics|

* Consequentialism
* Deontology
* Virtue

Free will|

* Compatibilism
* Determinism
* Hard
* Incompatibilism
* Hard
* Libertarianism

Metaphysics|

* Atomism
* Dualism
* Monism
* Naturalism

Epistemology|

* Constructivism
* Empiricism
* Idealism
* Particularism
* Fideism
* Rationalism
* /Nihilism-->
* Solipsism

Mind|

* Behaviorism
* Emergentism
* Eliminativism
* Epiphenomenalism
* Functionalism
* Objectivism
* Subjectivism

Normativity|

* Absolutism
* Particularism
* Relativism
* Nihilism
* Skepticism
* Universalism

Ontology|

* Action
* Event
* Process

Reality|

* Anti-realism
* Conceptualism
* Idealism
* Materialism
* Naturalism
* Nominalism
* Physicalism
* Realism

* By region
* Related lists
* Miscellaneous

| By region|

* African
* Ethiopian
* Amerindian
* Aztec
* Eastern
* Chinese
* Egyptian
* Indian
* Indonesian
* Iranian
* Japanese
* Korean
* Pakistani
* Vietnamese
* Western
* American
* Australian
* British
* Czech
* Danish
* French
* German
* Greek
* Italian
* Polish
* Romanian
* Russian
* Slovene
* Spanish
* Turkish

|

Lists|

* Outline
* Index
* Years
* Problems
* Schools
* Glossary
* Philosophers
* Movements
* Publications

Miscellaneous|

* Natural law
* Sage
* Theoretical philosophy / Practical philosophy
* Women in philosophy

* Portal
* Category
* Book

* v
* t
* e

Analytic philosophy

Related articles|

| Areas of focus|

* Epistemology
* Language
* Mathematics
* Science

|

Turns|

* Aretaic
* Linguistic

Logic|

* Classical
* Mathematical
* Non-classical
* Philosophical

Theories|

* Anti-realism
* Australian realism
* Descriptivist theory of names
* Emotivism
* Functionalism
* Analytical feminism
* Logical atomism
* Logical positivism
* Analytical Marxism
* Neopragmatism
* Neurophilosophy
* Ordinary language
* Quietism
* Scientific structualism
* Sense data

Concepts|

* Analysis (Paradox)
* Analytic–synthetic distinction
* Counterfactual
* Natural kind
* Reflective equilibrium
* Supervenience

| Modality|

* Actualism
* Necessity
* Possibility
* Possible world
* Realism
* Rigid designator

|

Philosophers|

* Nick Bostrom
* Noam Chomsky
* Patricia Churchland
* David Chalmers
* James F. Conant
* Alice Crary
* Daniel Dennett
* Cora Diamond
* Keith Donnellan
* Paul Feyerabend
* Bas van Fraassen
* Gottlob Frege
* Jerry Fodor
* Ian Hacking
* Jaegwon Kim
* Alasdair MacIntyre
* J. L. Mackie
* Ruth Millikan
* Ernest Nagel
* Thomas Nagel
* Derek Parfit
* Karl Popper
* Graham Priest
* John Searle
* Peter Singer
* J. J. C. Smart
* Ernest Sosa
* Barry Stroud
* Charles Taylor
* Michael Walzer

| Cambridge|

* Charlie Broad
* Norman Malcolm
* G. E. Moore
* Bertrand Russell
* Frank P. Ramsey
* Ludwig Wittgenstein

|

Oxford|

* G. E. M. Anscombe
* J. L. Austin
* A. J. Ayer
* Michael Dummett
* Antony Flew
* Philippa Foot
* Peter Geach
* Paul Grice
* R. M. Hare
* Gilbert Ryle
* P. F. Strawson
* Richard Swinburne
* Bernard Williams
* Timothy Williamson

Berlin Circle|

* Carl Gustav Hempel
* Hans Reichenbach

Vienna Circle|

* Rudolf Carnap
* Kurt Gödel
* Otto Neurath
* Moritz Schlick

Harvard|

* Roderick Chisholm
* Donald Davidson
* Nelson Goodman
* Christine Korsgaard
* Thomas Kuhn
* Robert Nozick
* Hilary Putnam
* W. V. O. Quine
* John Rawls

Pittsburgh School|

* Robert Brandom
* John McDowell
* Nicholas Rescher
* Wilfrid Sellars

Princeton|

* David Lewis
* Saul Kripke
* Richard Rorty

Notre Dame|

* Robert Audi
* Peter van Inwagen
* Alvin Plantinga

* Category
* Index

* v
* t
* e

Stoicism

Philosophers|

| Early|

* Zeno of Citium
* Persaeus
* Aristo
* Sphaerus
* Herillus
* Cleanthes
* Chrysippus
* Zeno of Tarsus
* Crates of Mallus
* Diogenes of Babylon
* Apollodorus
* Antipater of Tarsus

|

Middle|

* Panaetius
* Dardanus
* Mnesarchus
* Hecato
* Posidonius
* Diodotus
* Geminus
* Antipater of Tyre
* Athenodorus Cananites

Late|

* Seneca
* Cornutus
* Musonius Rufus
* Euphrates
* Cleomedes
* Epictetus
* Hierocles
* Junius Rusticus
* Marcus Aurelius

Philosophy|

* Stoicism
* categories
* logic
* passions
* physics
* Neostoicism
* Modern Stoicism

Concepts|

* Adiaphora
* Apatheia
* Ataraxia
* Ekpyrosis
* Eudaimonia
* Katalepsis
* Kathekon
* Logos
* Oikeiôsis
* Pneuma
* Prohairesis
* Sophos

Works|

| Epictetus|

* Discourses
* Enchiridion

|

Marcus
Aurelius|

* Meditations

Seneca|

* Letters to Lucilius
* Essays:
* Anger
* Benefits
* Clemency
* Constancy
* Happiness
* Leisure
* Providence
* Shortness of Life
* Tranquillity
* Consolations

Other|

* Lectures (Musonius Rufus)
* On Passions (Chrysippus)
* Republic (Zeno)

Related articles|

* Paradoxa Stoicorum
* Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta
* Stoic Opposition

Template:Virtues

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue ethics. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Virtue_ethics&oldid=4172176"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template