Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearings

* Justices
* CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS
* ASSOCIATE JUSTICES
* SAMUEL ALITO
* AMY CONEY BARRETT
* STEPHEN BREYER
* NEIL GORSUCH
* ELENA KAGAN
* BRETT KAVANAUGH
* SONIA SOTOMAYOR
* CLARENCE THOMAS
* CASES BY TERM
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
* Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
* HISTORY OF THE COURT
* CHIEF JUSTICE ERAS
* HISTORIC SCOTUS CASES
* MAJOR CASES OF THE SUPREME COURT 2016 TERM
* MAJOR CASES OF THE SUPREME COURT 2015 TERM
* What happens to this term's major SCOTUS cases in a 4-4 split?
* MAJOR CASES OF THE SUPREME COURT 2014 TERM
* MAJOR CASES OF THE SUPREME COURT 2013 TERM
* MAJOR CASES OF THE SUPREME COURT 2012 TERM
* Recent vacancies
* 2020 VACANCY AND BARRETT CONFIRMATION
* 2018 VACANCY AND KAVANAUGH CONFIRMATION
* 2017 VACANCY AND GORSUCH CONFIRMATION

## Contents

* 1 Day four (10/15/2020)
* 1.1 Witness testimonies
* 2 Day three (10/14/2020)
* 3 Day two (10/13/2020)
* 4 Day one (10/12/2020)
* 4.1 Judiciary Committee member statements
* 4.2 Amy Coney Barrett opening statement
* 5 Judiciary Committee questionnaire
* 6 See also
* 7 Footnotes

SCOTUS Vacancy, 2020

Nominee
Amy Coney Barrett
Former Justice
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Coverage

Process to fill the seat
Confirmation hearings

See also
Supreme Court vacancy, 2018
Supreme Court vacancy, 2017
Supreme Court of the United States

* Ruth Bader Ginsburg

* Supreme Court of the United States

* Supreme Court vacancy, 2020

* Amy Coney Barrett

* Process to fill the seat

Confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett were held between October 12, 2020, and October 15, 2020. All nominees to the court are subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate. Judicial nominations from the president are referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. At the time of Barrett's hearing, 22 senators sat on the committee, including 12 Republicans and 10 Democrats. The committee chairman was Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and the ranking member was Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

On October 22, 2020, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-0 to advance Barrett's nomination to the full Senate.[1] Democratic senators did not attend the vote in protest of the proceedings. The full Senate voted on Barrett's nomination on October 26, 2020.[2]

The entries below are listed in reverse chronological order. Click here for day one, here for day two, here for day three, and here for day four.

HIGHLIGHTS

* Barrett was President Trump's (R) third nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court. He earlier appointed Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacancy opened by Antonin Scalia's death and Brett Kavanaugh to fill the vacancy opened by Anthony Kennedy's retirement.

* Barrett was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in 2017. She earlier spent 15 years on the faculty of Notre Dame Law School, as well as working as an attorney in private practice.

* Ginsburg was appointed to the Court by President Bill Clinton (D) and served until her death on September 18, 2020.

## Day four (10/15/2020)[edit]

HIGHLIGHTS

* Two panels of witnesses on both sides of the confirmation spoke during the final day of the hearings.

* Witnesses in support of Barrett's confirmation included the American Bar Association, former Judge Thomas Griffith, a law school professor, a former student, and a former mentee and employee.

* Witnesses opposed to Barrett's confirmation included the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a medical doctor, a small business owner and activist, and a nonprofit leader.

### Witness testimonies[edit]

Click the names below to access a transcript of each witness' testimony during the hearings, if available.[3]

* Randall D. Noel and Pamela J. Roberts, representatives from the American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary

* Dr. Farhan Bhatti, family physician and CEO of Care Free Medical

* Hon. Thomas B. Griffith, retired judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

* Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

* Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, James Monroe Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia

* Crystal Good, writer-poet, small business owner, advocate, graduate student at West Virginia University

* Amanda Rauh-Bieri, associate at the Law Firm of Miller Canfield

* Stacy Staggs, director of community engagement for Little Lobbyists

* Laura E. Wolk, former law student of Judge Amy Coney Barrett

## Day three (10/14/2020)[edit]

HIGHLIGHTS

* On the third day of hearings, senators questioned Judge Barrett for almost nine hours, with each senator allotted 20 minutes.

* Recurring themes in the questioning included abortion, election administration, immigration, and presidential power.

The topics below were comprised from a number of analysis and summary articles.

Abortion

Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.) asked Barrett whether Griswold v. Connecticut (which affirmed a person's right to buy and use contraception) was correctly decided.[4]

Barrett responded, "I think Griswold is not going anywhere unless you plan to pass a law prohibiting couples, all people, from using birth control."[5] She further stated, "I think the only reason that it's even worth asking that question is to lay a predicate for whether Roe was rightly decided...I think that Griswold is very, very, very, very, very, very unlikely to go anywhere."[4]

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) questioned Barrett on her decision to rule in favor of a Chicago law that places a buffer zone between pro-life protesters and abortion clinics.

According to the Deseret News, "Barrett said she followed a binding Supreme Court precedent in deciding that case."[6]

Election administration

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked Barrett whether "the president has the right to deny a person the right to vote based on their race."[7]

Barrett cited the 15th Amendment of the Constitution and said, "The Constitution contains provisions that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race and voting."[7]

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) asked Barrett whether she agreed with Chief Justice John Roberts on the existence of voter discrimination.[8]

Barrett answered, "I will not comment on what any justice said in an opinion, whether an opinion is right or wrong or endorse that proposition."[8] Barrett also said, "Racial discrimination still exists in the United States, and I think we've seen evidence of that this summer."[8]

Immigration

According to The Washington Post, Barrett wrote a dissent that upheld the public charge rule, an immigration regulation requiring that migrants demonstrate that they are not reliant on government support in order to be considered for citizenship.[5][9] Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) questioned Barrett on her dissent.[5]

Barrett responded, "Yes, I said there was fear and there was disenrollment [in government benefits], but that the rule did not apply to anyone currently eligible...I said in my dissent that it would be better to send that back to the District Court."[5]

Presidential power

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Barrett whether a president could ignore a court order or pardon himself from a crime.[5]

Barrett answered, "The Supreme Court can’t control what the president obeys...So far as I know, that question has never been litigated...That question may or may not arise, but it’s one that calls for legal analysis about what the scope of the pardon power is."[5]

Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) asked Barrett if anyone was above the law.[8]

Barrett responded, "No one is above the law in the United States."[8]

## Day two (10/13/2020)[edit]

HIGHLIGHTS

* The second day of Barrett’s confirmation hearings consisted of senators questioning the judge for 11 hours, with each senator allotted 30 minutes.

* Recurring themes in the questioning included abortion, the Affordable Care Act, election disputes, legal access to firearms, and same-sex marriage.

* Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) scheduled a committee vote on Barrett's nomination for October 22.

The topics below were comprised from a number of analysis and summary articles.

Abortion

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked Barrett whether she agreed with Justice Antonin Scalia's belief that Roe v. Wade was incorrectly decided.[10]

Barrett said, she was “not going to grade” decisions or “give a thumbs up or thumbs down."[10] When pressed further on the abortion issue, Barrett said, "I can’t pre-commit or say ‘yes, I’m going in with some agenda.’...I have no agenda to try to overrule Casey (Supreme Court case that affirmed Roe v. Wade)...I have an agenda to decide cases as they come."[10]

Further questions on abortion focused on an ad Barrett signed in 2006.[11] Originally published in The South Bend Tribune, the ad read, "We, the following citizens of Michiana, oppose abortion on demand and defend the right to life from fertilization to natural death. Please continue to pray to end abortion."[12]

Affordable Care Act

Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Barrett if she had promised anyone that she would vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act.[10]

Barrett said, "Absolutely not...I was never asked. And if I had been, that would have been a short conversation."[10] She further answered, "Just as I didn't make any prior commitments and was not asked to make any commitments on the executive branch side, I can't make any prior commitments to this body either. It would be inconsistent with judicial independence."[10]

Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.) asked Barrett about, "Countering the Majoritarian Difficulty," a book review in which she stated, "Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute."[13]

Barrett said, I'm not "looking for a way to take it down. I have no hostility to the ACA or any other law."[10]

Election disputes

Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.) asked whether Barrett would recuse herself from any cases involving the 2020 presidential election.

Barrett said, "I will consider all factors that are relevant to that question that requires recusal when there’s an appearance of bias...I can’t commit to you right now, but I do assure you of my integrity, and I do assure you that I would take that question very seriously."[10]

When Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked Barrett if the Constitution gave the president unilateral authority to delay an election, Barrett said, "Well, senator, if that question ever came before me, I would need to hear arguments from the litigants and read the briefs and consult with my law clerks and talk to my colleagues and go through the opinion writing process...If I give off-the-cuff answers, then I would be basically a legal pundit. And I don't think we want judges to be legal pundits. I think we want judges to approach cases thoughtfully and with an open mind."[14]

Legal access to firearms

Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) asked Barrett about her dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr, in which she argued that the Constitution does not allow the government to ban all felons from owning firearms.[10]

Barrett said, "I concluded based on that history that one couldn’t take the right away simply because one was a felon. There had to be a showing of dangerousness...We could all agree that we ought to be careful saying that just because someone is a felon, they lose any of their individual rights."[10]

While discussing District of Columbia v. Heller, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) asked, "Is that true no matter what the issue is, whether it’s gun, abortion, health care, campaign finance? Does that process [appeals process] hold true for everything?"[15]

Barrett answered, "...Judges can’t wake up one day and say, I have an agenda, I like guns, I hate guns, I like abortion, I hate abortion, and walk in like a royal queen and impose their will on the world. You have to wait for cases and controversies, which is the language of the Constitution, to wind their way through the process."[15]

Same-sex marriage

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked, "Do you agree with this particular point of Justice Scalia’s view that the U.S. Constitution does not afford gay people the fundamental right to marry?"

Barrett answered, "I don’t think that anybody should assume that just because Justice Scalia decided a decision a certain way that I would, too...and I’m sorry to not be able to embrace or disavow Justice Scalia’s position, but I really can’t do that on any point of law."[16]

## Day one (10/12/2020)[edit]

HIGHLIGHTS

* October 12, 2020, was the first day of confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.

* Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.), Senator Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Notre Dame Law professor Patricia O'Hara introduced Barrett.

* Barrett gave her testimony before the committee, which lasted about 13 minutes.

The first day of Amy Coney Barrett's Senate confirmation hearings began at 9:00 a.m. EST. Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) provided opening statements, followed by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.) and Senator Mike Braun (R-Ind.) then introduced Barrett. After the introductions, Barrett gave her opening statement. Professor Patricia O'Hara ended the day with her introduction of Barrett, as O'Hara experienced technical difficulties during the initial introductions.[17]

### Judiciary Committee member statements[edit]

Click the links below to access the opening statements made by the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Statements were obtained from senators' websites and the media.

* Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)

* Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)

* Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)

* John Cornyn (R-Texas)

* Dick Durbin (D-Ill.)

* Mike Lee (R-Utah)

* Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.)

* Ted Cruz (R-Texas)

* Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)

* Ben Sasse (R-Neb.)

* Christopher Coons (D-Del.)

* Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)

* Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)

* Thom Tillis (R-N.C.)

* Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii)

* Joni Ernst (R-Iowa)

* Cory Booker (D-N.J.)

* Kamala Harris (D-Calif.)

* John Kennedy (R-La.)

* Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.)

* Mike Crapo (R-Idaho)

### Amy Coney Barrett opening statement[edit]

The video below shows Amy Coney Barrett's opening statement. Click here for the transcript of her speech.

"Judge Amy Coney Barrett Opening Statement" October 12, 2020

## Judiciary Committee questionnaire[edit]

The Senate Judiciary Committee provided Barrett with a questionnaire to fill out prior to her October 12 confirmation hearing. She returned the completed questionnaire September 29.

## See also[edit]

* Supreme Court vacancy, 2020
* Process to fill the vacated seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
* Supreme Court of the United States
* History of the Supreme Court

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ National Public Radio, "Senate Judiciary Committee Sets Date To Vote On Barrett Nomination Next Week," October 15, 2020
2. ↑ The Wall Street Journal, "Amy Coney Barrett’s Nomination Advanced by Senate Judiciary Committee," October 22, 2020
3. ↑ Committee on the Judiciary, "Nomination of the Honorable Amy Coney Barrett to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (Day 4)," accessed October 15, 2020
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 NPR, "Pressed On Landmark Contraception Case, Barrett Again Declines To Answer," October 14, 2020
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 The Washington Post, "Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearing live updates: Trump nominee says ‘no one is above the law’ but declines to say whether president has power to pardon himself," October 14, 2020
6. ↑ Deseret News, "Why Sen. Mike Lee says Barrett would be evenhanded Supreme Court justice," October 14, 2020
7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 The Wall Street Journal, "Day Three: Q&A Continues," October 14, 2020
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 CBS News, "Live updates: Amy Coney Barrett faces questions on Day 3 of Senate hearings," October 14, 2020
9. ↑ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, "Public Charge," accessed October 14, 2020
10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 The Washington Post, "Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearing live updates: Barrett says she made ‘no commitment’ to White House, Senate on how she would decide cases," October 13, 2020
11. ↑ The New York Times, "Amy Coney Barrett signed an ad in 2006 urging overturning the ‘barbaric legacy’ of Roe v. Wade.," October 1, 2020
12. ↑ The Guardian, "Revealed: Amy Coney Barrett supported group that said life begins at fertilization," October 1, 2020
13. ↑ Notre Dame Law School, "Countering the Majoritarian Difficulty," January 3, 2017 (page 80)
14. ↑ The Hill, "Barrett declines to say if Trump can unilaterally delay election," October 13, 2020
15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Yahoo! News, "Barrett owns a gun, but says she will rule 'fairly' on issue," October 13, 2020
16. ↑ Committee on the Judiciary, "Nomination of the Honorable Amy Coney Barrett to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (Day 2)," accessed October 13, 2020
17. ↑ Committee on the Judiciary, "Nomination of the Honorable Amy Coney Barrett to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States," accessed October 12, 2020

v • e

Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States

|

Active justices|

Chief justice: Roberts
Associate justices: Alito • Barrett • Breyer • Gorsuch • Kagan • Kavanaugh • Sotomayor • Thomas

Senior justices|

Kennedy • O'Connor • Souter

Former chief justices|

Burger • Chase • Ellsworth • Fuller • Hughes • Jay • Marshall • Rehnquist • Rutledge • Stone • Taft • Taney • Vinson • Waite • Warren •

White
Former associate justices|

Baldwin • Barbour • Black • Blackmun • Blair • Blatchford • Bradley • Brandeis • Brennan • Brewer • Brown • Burton • Butler • Byrnes • Campbell • Cardozo • Catron • Chase • Clark • Clarke • Clifford • Curtis • Cushing • Daniel • Davis • Day • Douglas • Duvall • Field • Fortas • Frankfurter • Ginsburg • Goldberg • Gray • Grier • Harlan I • Harlan II • Holmes • Hunt • Iredell • H. Jackson • R. Jackson • T. Johnson • W. Johnson, Jr. • J. Lamar • L. Lamar • Livingston • Lurton • Marshall • Matthews • McKenna • McKinley • McLean • McReynolds • Miller • Minton • Moody • Moore • Murphy • Nelson • Paterson • Peckham • Pitney • Powell • Reed • Roberts • W. Rutledge • Sanford • Scalia • Shiras • Stevens • Stewart • Story • Strong • Sutherland • Swayne • Thompson • Todd • Trimble • Van Devanter • Washington • Wayne • B. White • Whittaker • Wilson • Woodbury • Woods

v • e

Ballotpedia

About|

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, President • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy

Communications: Kayla Harris • Megan Brown • Mary Dunne • Sarah Groat • Lauren Nemerovski
External Relations: Alison Prange • Sara Key • Kari Berger • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski • Lauren Dixon • Kelly Rindfleisch • Sara Horton • Elizabeth Brown
Policy: Christopher Nelson • Caitlin Styrsky • Molly Byrne • Katharine Frey • Jace Lington • Jimmy McAllister
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Tech Manager • Ryan Burch • Michael Cella • Kirsten Corrao • Margaret Kearney • Tom Reitz

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial|

Geoff Pallay, Editor-in-Chief • Daniel Anderson, Managing Editor • Josh Altic, Managing Editor • Cory Eucalitto, Managing Editor • Mandy Gillip, Managing Editor • Jerrick Adams • Victoria Antram • Dave Beaudoin • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Ryan Byrne • Kate Carsella • Kelly Coyle • Megan Feeney • Tyler King • Doug Kronaizl • Amee LaTour • David Luchs • Brittony Maag • Andrew McNair • Jackie Mitchell • Elisabeth Moore • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Murphy • Paul Rader • Ethan Rice • Abbey Smith • Janie Valentine • Caitlin Vanden Boom • Joel Williams • Corinne Wolyniec • Samuel Wonacott • Mercedes Yanora