Public policy in Montana

* Fiscal policy
* Budgets
* Budget and finances by state
* Tax policy by state
* State Budget Terms
* State government tax collections by source
* Total state expenditures
* State spending by function as a percent of total expenditures
* State debt
* Finance
* Financial regulation in the United States
* Dodd-Frank Act
* Federal Reserve
* Pensions
* Pension policy by state
* Public pension health by state
* Pension reform in San Jose and San Diego
* Pension Terms and Definitions
* Public pensions
* Civil liberties
* Affirmative action
* Campaign finance
* Nonprofit regulation
* Education
* Public education by state
* School choice by state
* Charter schools by state
* Higher education by state
* Education policy in the United States
* Public education in the United States
* Education statistics
* Education statistics in the United States
* Education spending per pupil
* Number of schools by school type in the U.S.
* Demographic information for all students in the United States
* Public school system expenditures in the United States
* Public school system revenues in the United States
* Public school teacher salaries in the United States
* Graduation rates by groups in state
* Public high school dropout rates by state
* ACT and SAT scores in the United States
* NAEP scores by state
* Major terms
* Blended learning
* Charter schools
* Common Core
* Dropout rate
* Progressive education
* Regulatory Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate
* School vouchers
* Teacher merit pay
* United States education agencies
* Elections
* Voting policy
* Voter identification laws by state
* Online voter registration
* Early voting
* Ballot access
* Ballot access for presidential candidates
* Ballot access for major and minor party candidates
* List of political parties in the United States
* Political party designation
* Redistricting
* State-by-state redistricting procedures
* Majority-minority districts
* Energy and Environment
* Energy Policy by state
* Fracking
* Fracking information by state
* Fracking
* Fracking in the United States
* Energy policy in the United States
* Energy use in the United States
* Oil and gas on federal lands by state
* Energy terms and definitions
* Agencies and legislation
* Environmental Policy by state
* Endangered Species Policy
* Endangered species policy by state
* Environmental policy in the United States
* Environmental statistics
* Endangered species statistics
* Glossary of environmental terms
* Glossary of endangered species terms
* Healthcare
* Healthcare policy by state
* Medicaid spending by state
* Effect of the Affordable Care Act by state
* Healthcare policy in the United States
* Affordable Care Act
* Immigration
* Immigration in the United States
* Immigration by state
* Index

## Contents

* 1 Budget Policy
* 1.1 Budget and finances
* 1.2 Taxes
* 2 Civil Liberties Policy
* 2.1 Affirmative action
* 2.2 Campaign finance
* 3 Background
* 4 Contribution limits
* 4.1 State comparisons in the 2024 elections
* 5 Candidate reporting requirements
* 6 Noteworthy events
* 6.1 2018
* 6.2 2015
* 6.3 2014
* 6.4 2011
* 7 Campaign finance legislation
* 8 Election and campaign ballot measures
* 9 Contact information
* 9.1 Election agencies
* 10 Recent news
* 11 See also
* 12 Footnotes
* 12.1 Nonprofit regulation
* 13 Education Policy
* 13.1 K-12 Public education
* 13.2 Higher education
* 13.3 School choice
* 13.4 Charter schools
* 14 Election Policy
* 14.1 Ballot access requirements
* 14.2 Redistricting
* 14.3 Voting
* 15 Energy Policy
* 15.1 Energy information
* 15.2 Fracking
* 16 Environmental Policy
* 16.1 Environmental information
* 16.2 Endangered species
* 17 Finance Policy
* 17.1 Financial regulation information
* 18 Healthcare Policy
* 18.1 Healthcare information
* 18.2 Medicaid spending
* 18.3 Effect of the Affordable Care Act
* 19 Immigration Policy
* 19.1 Immigration information
* 20 Pension Policy
* 20.1 Public pensions
* 21 Public policy in other states
* 22 Footnotes

* * *

This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.

* * *

The Public Policy Project on Ballotpedia aims to illuminate major policy issues being discussed and implemented throughout the United States. Public policy can be complicated and controversial; deciding what works best and how to allocate resources to achieve a policy goal can involve multiple trade-offs. Much of the public policy that affects citizens economically, legally and socially, is made at the state level. Below you will find links and introductions to all the Montana public policy articles on Ballotpedia. To see the policy overview of another state click on the map below.

For a list of all public policy articles on Ballotpedia see here.

## Budget Policy[edit]

### Budget and finances[edit]

In Montana, as in other states, lawmakers and public officials are elected in part to manage the state's finances. This includes generating revenues (money coming into the state from various sources) and approving expenditures (the money spent on governmental functions and servicing state debt). State budgets are complex and fluid, as they depend on anticipated revenues and planned expenditures, which may alter over the course of a fiscal year. If revenues do not keep pace with expenditures, states generally have to raise taxes, cut services, borrow money, or a combination of the three. State budget decisions are also influenced by policy decisions at the national level, such as the Affordable Care Act or energy and environmental regulations, and issues at the local level, such as crime and the quality of education.

HIGHLIGHTS

* Between fiscal years 2015 and 2016, total government spending in Montana increased by approximately $1.0 million—from $6.4 billion in fiscal year 2015 to an estimated $6.4 billion in 2016. This represents a 0.0-percent increase.[1]

* In Montana in fiscal year 2015, 49.5 percent of total tax revenues came from income taxes.

* Education accounted for 26.2 percent of state expenditures in fiscal year 2015, while 17.4 percent went to Medicaid.

### Taxes[edit]

Montana generates the bulk of its tax revenue by levying a personal income tax and select sales taxes (otherwise known as excise taxes). The state derives its constitutional authority to tax from Article VIII of the state constitution.[2][3]

Tax policy can vary from state to state. States levy taxes to help fund the variety of services provided by state governments. Tax collections comprise approximately 40 percent of the states' total revenues. The rest comes from non-tax sources, such as intergovernmental aid (e.g., federal funds), lottery revenues and fees. The primary types of taxes levied by state governments include personal income tax, general sales tax, excise (or special sales) taxes and corporate income tax.[4]

HIGHLIGHTS

* According to the United States Census Bureau, Montana collected $2.63 billion in tax revenue in 2016. The state's tax revenue per capita was $2,521.

## Civil Liberties Policy[edit]

### Affirmative action[edit]

Affirmative action in Montana refers to the steps taken by employers and universities in Montana to increase the proportions of historically disadvantaged minority groups at those institutions. Historically, affirmative action nationwide has taken many different forms, such as strict quotas, extra outreach efforts, and racial and gender preferences. However, racial quotas in university admissions were banned in a 1978 United States Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.[5]

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court reversed lower court decisions in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, effectively ending the use of affirmative action in college admissions.

As of March 2015, 109 out of 577 public four-year universities across the country reported that they considered race in admissions. This practice has been banned in eight states. Meanwhile, 28 states require affirmative action plans in either public employment or apprenticeships. Affirmative action programs that grant racial preferences have come under scrutiny in the courts for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.[6][7]

HIGHLIGHTS

* In Montana, no public universities reported considering race in admissions as of March 2015. Montana has two laws that require employment preferences for veterans and persons with disabilities in the public sector.

The effects of affirmative action policies are contested. Proponents argue that affirmative action diversifies selective institutions and provides more opportunities to minorities. Opponents argue that implementing policies that favor some groups requires discrimination against others and that these policiesmay harm individuals they are meant to help.

### Campaign finance[edit]

Campaign finance requirements govern how much money candidates and campaigns may receive from individuals and organizations, how they must report those contributions, and how much individuals, organizations, and political parties may contribute to campaigns. In addition to direct campaign contributions, campaign finance laws also apply to third-party organizations and nonprofit organizations that seek to influence elections through independent expenditures or issue advocacy.

This page provides background on campaign finance regulation, lists contribution limits to state candidates and ballot measures in Montana, compares contribution limits to gubernatorial and state legislative candidates in Montana with those from other states, and details the candidate reporting requirements in Montana.

The information on this page pertains to candidates for state office and state ballot measures. Candidates for federal office are subject to federal campaign finance law. Candidates for local office are subject to all applicable state laws as well as any separate local campaign finance regulations.[8]

As of July 2025:

* Individuals could contribute $1,120 per election to gubernatorial candidates, $790 per election to other statewide candidates, $450 per election to state senate candidates, and $450 per election to state house candidates.

* State parties could contribute $112,200 per election to gubernatorial candidates, $84,150 per election to other statewide candidates, $3,350 per election to state senate candidates, and $2,250 per election to state house candidates.

* Political committee contribution limits matched individual limits.

* Corporations and unions could not contribute directly or indirectly to candidates for office or party committees.

## Background[edit]

Seal of the United States Federal Election Commission

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent regulatory agency responsible for administering and enforcing federal campaign election laws. The FEC is responsible for disclosing campaign finance information, enforcing limits and prohibitions on contributions and the oversight of the public funding of presidential elections.[9] According to the FEC, an individual becomes a federal candidate, and must begin to report their campaign finances, once he or she has either raised or spent $5,000 in pursuit of his or her campaign. Within 15 days of this benchmark for status as a candidate, the candidate must register with the FEC and designate an official campaign committee, to be responsible for the funds and expenditures of the campaign. This committee must have an official treasurer, and cannot support any candidate but the one who registered the committee. Detailed financial reports are then made to the FEC every financial quarter after the individual is registered with the FEC. Reports are also made before primaries and before the general election.[10]

The rules governing federal election campaigns and contributions have evolved over the past generation as result of a number of Supreme Court decisions. In the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, the court held that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited. The court's decision also overturned the ban on for-profit and not-for-profit corporations and unions broadcasting electioneering communications in the 30 days before a presidential primary and in the 60 days before a general election.[11] In the SpeechNOW.org v. Federal Election Commission decision, the first application of the Citizens United decision, the court held that contribution limits on what individuals could give to independent expenditure-only groups, and the amount these organizations could receive, were unconstitutional. Contribution limits on donations directly to candidates, however, remain constitutional.[12][13] In 2014's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission decision, the court overturned biennial aggregate campaign contribution limits, and held that individuals may now contribute to as many federal candidates as they want, but may only contribute up to the federal limit in each case.[14]

While the FEC governs federal election campaigns and contribution limits, individual states require their own level of regulation and reporting. The amount of regulation required differs by state, as do the limits on campaign contributions and third-party activities to influence elections. Candidates for local office must follow any applicable state and local campaign finance regulations.

## Contribution limits[edit]

The table below details contribution limits as they applied to various types of individuals and groups in Montana as of July 2025. The uppermost row of the table indicates the contributor, while the leftmost column indicates the recipient. Limits apply per election unless otherwise noted.

Montana contribution limits as of July 2025 | Individuals| Political committees| Independent political committees (PACs)| Political party

|
|
|
|

Governor| $1,120| N/A| $1,120| $112,200
Statewide candidate| $790| N/A| $790| $84,150
Senate| $450| N/A| $450| $3,350
Assembly| $450| N/A| $450| $2,250
PAC| Unlimited| Unlimited| N/A| N/A
Party committees| Unlimited| Unlimited| N/A| N/A
Ballot measures| Unlimited| Unlimited| N/A| N/A
Limits apply per election.
Sources: Montana Commissioner of Political Practices, "State of Montana Political Campaign Contribution Limits Summary," accessed July 16, 2025

### State comparisons in the 2024 elections[edit]

See also: State-by-state comparison of campaign finance requirements

Individual contribution limits

Party contribution limits

Political committee contribution limits

Corporation and union contribution limits

As of the 2024 elections, there were no individual contribution limits on contributions to gubernatorial or state legislative candidates in 12 states. The remaining 38 states, including Montana, had varying limits.

Montana

Individual contribution limits in Montana:

* Governor: $1,000 per election
* State Senate: $400 per election
* State House: $400 per election

Comparison to other states

In the other states with individual contribution limits:

* Governor
* Minimum: $625 per election (Colorado)
* Maximum: $36,400 per election (California)
* State Senate
* Minimum: $200 per election (Colorado)
* Maximum: $15,499.69 per election (Ohio)
* State House
* Minimum: $200 per election (Colorado)
* Maximum: $15,499.69 per election (Ohio)

As of the 2024 elections, there were no state party contribution limits on contributions to gubernatorial or state legislative candidates in 21 states. The remaining 29 states, including Montana, had varying limits.

Montana

State party contribution limits in Montana:

* Governor: $100,000 per election
* State Senate: $3,000 per election
* State House: $2,000 per election

Comparison to other states

In other states with party contribution limits:

* Governor
* Minimum: $1,950 per election (Maine)
* Maximum: $874,182.62 per election (Ohio)
* State Senate
* Minimum: $475 (Maine)
* Maximum: $174,371.53 (Ohio)
* State House
* Minimum: $475 (Maine)
* Maximum: $174,371.53 (Ohio)

As of the 2024 elections, there were no political committee contribution limits on contributions to gubernatorial or state legislative candidates in 12 states. The remaining 38 states, including Montana, had varying limits.

Montana

Political committee contribution limits in Montana:

* Governor: $1,000 per election
* State Senate: $400 per election
* State House: $400 per election

Comparison to other states

In other states with political committee contribution limits:

* Governor
* Minimum: $625 per election (Colorado)
* Maximum: $86,000[15] (Wisconsin)
* State Senate
* Minimum: $200 per election (Colorado)
* Maximum: $68,500 per election cycle (Illinois)
* State House
* Minimum: $200 per election (Colorado)
* Maximum: $68,500 per election cycle (Illinois)

As of the 2024 elections, there were no corporation or union contribution limits on contributions to gubernatorial or state legislative candidates in five states. They were prohibited in 20 states, including Montana. The remaining 25 states had varying limits.

Montana

Corporation/union contribution limits in Montana:

* Governor: Prohibited
* State Senate: Prohibited
* State House: Prohibited

Comparison to other states

In the 25 states with corporation/union contribution limits:

* Governor
* Minimum: $1,200 per election cycle (Delaware)
* Maximum: $36,400 (California)
* State Senate
* Minimum: $600 per election (Delaware)
* Maximum: $28,800 per election cycle (Tennessee)
* State House
* Minimum: $500 per election (Kansas)
* Maximum: $14,400 per election cycle (Tennessee)

## Candidate reporting requirements[edit]

Seal of Montana

See statutes: Title 13, Chapter 37, Part 2 of the Montana Code Annotated 2013

Each candidate for office must designate a campaign treasurer, who is responsible for depositing and disbursing funds, keeping accurate account records, and administering the various financial affairs of the campaign. A candidate may serve as his or her own treasurer or deputy treasurer. The treasurer must be registered to vote in Montana.[16]

The candidate must submit to the Commissioner of Political Practices and the election administrator of his or her county of residence a Statement of Candidate C-1 form within five days of becoming a candidate. This statement must include the full name and complete address of the campaign treasurer and any deputy treasurers. The statement must also include the name and address of the financial depository in which the campaign's account is located.[17][16]

With the exception of candidates for county, municipal or school district offices spending less than $500 in all elections in a campaign, all candidates must adhere to the campaign finance reporting requirements established in Title 13, Chapter 37 of the Montana Code Annotated. Candidates submit regular finance reports via forms prescribed by the Commissioner of Political Practices (Form C-5, Candidate Campaign Finance Reports), which require disclosure of the following types of information:[16]

* Cash summary; money received and spent: details cash transactions only for the reporting period
* Receipts
* candidate's personal contributions
* contributions amounting to less than $35 each
* loans
* interest, rebates, refunds, fundraisers, and other receipts
* political action committee contributions
* political party committee contributions
* incidental committee contributions
* other political committee contributions
* individual contributors of $35 or more
* Expenditures
* petty cash
* all other expenditures
* Debts and loans that have not been repaid

Report due dates vary depending on the office sought.[18][19][20]

Certain contributions made near the date of the election require special disclosure. A candidate must report contributions equal to the contribution limit from a single source between the 15th day of the month before an election and the day before the election within two business days of receipt. Such contributions should be reported via a Form C-7, provided by the Commissioner of Political Practices.[16]

## Noteworthy events[edit]

### 2018[edit]

On May 22, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed a district court decision upholding the constitutionality of several of the state's campaign finance statutes. The original challenge to these statutes was brought by Montanans for Community Development, a committee that desired to distribute mailers in the 2016 but declined to do so, arguing that disclosure and reporting requirements established by state law infringed upon the group's First Amendment rights. The appeals court rejected this argument, as did the district court before it.[21][22]

### 2015[edit]

In April 2015, Governor Steve Bullock signed SB 289 into law. According to The Billings Gazette, the bill did the following:[23]

1. created "a new category of regulated political activity called 'electioneering communications'
2. required "disclosure of any spending on 'electioneering communications' made within 60 days of when voting begins in an election"
3. required "disclosure from all groups making political expenditures or contributions during an election cycle"
4. increased "the frequency and length of time reporting is required during an election cycle"

### 2014[edit]

Montana Secretary of State Linda McCulloch

On October 24, 2014, according to The Washington Times, Montana Secretary of State Linda McCulloch (D) "filed a complaint ... alleging that Stanford University and Dartmouth College researchers broke four laws by sending 100,000 election mailers to voters that appeared to come from the state." The mailers, which asked respondents to rate the state's four nonpartisan state supreme court candidates as conservative or liberal, featured the state seal and were titled, "2014 Montana General Election Voter Information Guide." McCulloch argued that the mailers broke the following four Montana campaign laws:[24]

1. "a ban on 'fraudulent contrivance' that could cause a person to vote a certain way
2. "a prohibition on the dissemination of information that gives incorrect or misleading election procedures"
3. "a requirement that a person or group engaging in political activity register with the state"
4. a law "prohibiting the impersonation of a public servant"

Lisa Lapin, a spokesperson for Stanford University, said that the mailers were disseminated as part of a study intended "to compare voter turnout between precincts that receive mailers and those that don't." Shortly after McCulloch filed her complaint, the presidents of Stanford and Dartmouth issued a public apology. McCulloch subsequently declined to take legal action against the two institutions.[24][25]

On May 12, 2015, according to Montana Public Radio, Political Practices Commissioner Jonathan Motl determined that Stanford and Dartmouth had broken state law by distributing the mailers. Motl concluded that the mailers constituted an act of political advocacy; as such, Stanford and Dartmouth were required by state law to meet certain disclosure requirements. Motl said, "The decision actually found sufficient facts to show that the failure to register, report and disclosure as requirement by law, was a violation of the law." In a statement, Stanford University countered Motl's findings, saying, "The information in the mailer did not contain any advocacy ... and the mailer clearly stated that it was 'part of a joint research project at Stanford and Dartmouth.'" According to the Helena Independent Record, Motl "turned the matter over to Lewis and Clark County Attorney Leo Gallagher for prosecution."[26][27]

### 2011[edit]

In 2011, Western Tradition Partnership sued the state for violating the protections given groups in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling. The Montana Supreme Court found the following: "Citizens United does not compel a conclusion that Montana’s law prohibiting independent political expenditures by a corporation related to a candidate is unconstitutional. Rather, applying the principles enunciated in Citizens United, it is clear that Montana has a compelling interest to impose the challenged rationally-tailored statutory restrictions."[28] Upon appeal, the United States Supreme Court reversed the decision on the grounds that Montana's arguments "either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case."[29]

## Campaign finance legislation[edit]

The table below displays bills related to campaign finance introduced during or carried over to Montana's current legislative session.[30]

## Election and campaign ballot measures[edit]

See also: Elections and campaigns on the ballot and List of Montana ballot measures

Ballotpedia has tracked 15 statewide ballot measures relating to elections and campaigns.

1. Montana Referendum Measure No. 13, Direct Nomination of Candidates for Public Office Measure (1920)
2. Montana Referendum Measure No. 15, To Amend Direct Primaries Measure (1920)
3. Montana Referendum Measure No. 16, Repeal of the Presidential Preferential Primaries Measure (1920)
4. Montana Campaign Finance Law Revision, I-118 (1994)
5. Montana Corporate Contributions to Ballot Issues, IR-114 (1998)
6. Montana Valid Election for Qualified Ballot Issues, C-21 (1990)
7. Montana Initiative No. 304-305, Campaign Expense Limits Initiative (1912)
8. Montana Referendum Measure No. 27, Repeal Presidential Primary Measure (1924)
9. Montana Referendum 56, Presidential Primary Measure (1954)
10. Montana Voter Qualifications Amendment (1932)
11. Montana Change Voting Age, Amendment 3 (1970)
12. Montana Voting Age, Amendment 1 (1972)
13. Montana Direct Corporate Contribution in Ballot Issues, I-125 (1996)
14. Montana CI-126, Top-Four Primary Initiative (2024)
15. Montana CI-127, Majority Vote Required to Win Elections Initiative (2024)

## Contact information[edit]

### Election agencies[edit]

File:US-ElectionAssistanceCommission-Seal.svg

Seal of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission

See also: State election agencies

Individuals seeking additional information about election administration in Montana can contact the following local, state, and federal agencies.

Montana county election administrators

Click here for a list

Montana Secretary of State, Elections Division

Montana State Capitol, Room 260
P.O. Box 202801
1301 E 6th Avenue
Helena, Montana 59620
Phone: 406-444-9608

Email: soselections@mt.gov

Website: http://sos.mt.gov/elections/

Montana Commissioner of Political Practices

1209 8th Ave
P.O. Box 202401
Helena, Montana 59620-2401
Phone: 406-444-2942
Fax: 406-444-1643
Email: cpphelp@mt.gov
Website: https://politicalpractices.mt.gov

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

633 3rd Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 301-563-3919
Toll free: 1-866-747-1471
Email: clearinghouse@eac.gov
Website: https://www.eac.gov

Federal Election Commission (FEC)

1050 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20463

Telephone: (202)-694-1100

Toll-free: 1-800-424-9530

Email: info@fec.gov

Website: http://www.fec.gov/

## Recent news[edit]

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Montana campaign finance. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

Public policy in Montana - Google News

## See also[edit]

* Campaign finance regulation
* Ballot access requirements for political candidates in Montana
* Montana

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report (Fiscal 2014-2016)," accessed June 26, 2017
2. ↑ The Constitution of the State of Montana, "Article VIII," accessed October 17, 2014
3. ↑ Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Shares by Type 2000-2013," June 20, 2014
4. ↑ Brunori, D. (2011). State Tax Policy: A Political Perspective. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press
5. ↑ Oyez, "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke," accessed February 11, 2015
6. ↑ Miller Center of Public Affairs, "Affirmative Action: Race or Class?" accessed February 10, 2015
7. ↑ Business and Legal Resources, "Affirmative Action," accessed March 31, 2015
8. ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "Campaign Finance Enforcement," accessed May 28, 2025
9. ↑ Federal Election Commission, "About the FEC," accessed June 27, 2012
10. ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Candidate Registration Brochure," accessed December 7, 2012
11. ↑ New York Times, "Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit," January 21, 2010
12. ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Speechnow.org v. FEC," April 7, 2014
13. ↑ OpenSecrets, "Two Federal Court Rulings Could Change Campaign Finance Landscape," March 26, 2010
14. ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Ongoing Litigation," accessed March 18, 2015
15. ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "State Limits on Contributions to Candidates 2023-2024 Election Cycle," accessed May 8, 2025
16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Commissioner of Political Practices, "Accounting and Reporting Manual for Candidates and Treasurers," accessed July 16, 2025
17. ↑ Montana Code Annotated 2013, "Title 13, Chapter 37, Section 201," accessed January 8, 2014
18. ↑ Commissioner of Political Practices, "Statewide Candidates - Candidate Finance Report Calendar, 2013-2014, Primary and General Elections," accessed January 8, 2014
19. ↑ Commissioner of Political Practices, "Legislative Candidates - Candidate Finance Report Calendar, 2014, Primary and General Elections," accessed January 8, 2014
20. ↑ Commissioner of Political Practices, "Public Service Commissioner - Candidate Finance Report Calendar, 2014, Primary and General Elections," accessed January 8, 2014
21. ↑ United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, "Montanans for Community Development v. Mangan: Memorandum," May 22, 2018
22. ↑ U.S. News and World Report, "Appeals Court Upholds Montana Campaign Finance Reform Law," May 23, 2018
23. ↑ Billings Gazette, "Bullock signs Montana campaign finance bill into law," April 22, 2015
24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 The Washington Times, "Secretary of state files complaint over mailers," October 24, 2014
25. ↑ Great Falls Tribune, "Stanford apologies for Montana election mailers," October 24, 2014]
26. ↑ Montana Public Radio, "Dartmouth, Stanford Violated Montana Election Laws," May 12, 2015
27. ↑ http://helenair.com/news/politics/motl-stanford-dartmouth-mailers-broke-montana-campaign-laws/article_c0924936-db33-532f-8326-da2932325e36.html Helena Independent Record, "Motl: Stanford, Dartmouth mailers broke Montana campaign laws," May 12, 2015]
28. ↑ Election Law Blog, "Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General of the State of Montana," December 30, 2011
29. ↑ United States Supreme Court, "American Tradition Partnership, Inc v. Steve Bullock," June 25, 2012
30. ↑ Bills are organized by most recent action. Clicking on a bill will open its page on Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker, which includes bill details and a summary.

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond
External Relations:  Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events • Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Victoria Edwards • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Thomas Grobben • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Brandon McCauley • Andrew McNair • Ellie Mikus • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox • Heather Yates

v • e

State of Montana
Helena (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy

### Nonprofit regulation[edit]

Nonprofit regulation in Montana involves a complex set of rules that govern nonprofit organizations and charitable giving throughout the state. Major issues surrounding nonprofit regulation nationwide include the following:

* contribution limits,
* donor disclosure, and
* the redefinition of issue advocacy.

Montana is one of 11 states that do not require charitable organizations, or those intending to solicit on their behalf, to register with the state in order to solicit contributions, whether they are a Montana organization or based out-of-state.[1]

According to Guidestar, an organization that reports on nonprofit companies, regulation of nonprofit activity protects donors and organizations from potential fraud and helps "to maintain trust in the [nonprofit] sector." According to the London School of Economics, nonprofit disclosure requirements can create privacy concerns among potential donors, thereby having an unintended negative impact on donor participation.[2][3]

## Education Policy[edit]

Charter schools •  Higher education •  Public education •  School choice

### K-12 Public education[edit]

The Montana public school system (prekindergarten through grade 12) operates within districts governed by locally elected school boards and superintendents. In 2022, Montana had 108,894 students enrolled in a total of  684 schools in 302 school districts. There were 7,866 teachers in the public schools, or roughly one teacher for every 14 students, compared to the national average of 1:16. In 2020, Montana spent on average $12,101 per pupil.[4] The state's graduation rate was 87 percent in the 2018-2019 school year.[5]

### Higher education[edit]

Montana's higher education system is composed of 23 colleges and universities. Of these, 17 are public institutions, six are nonprofit private schools, and none are for-profit private institutions.[6]

HIGHLIGHTS

* Students attending public colleges in Montana from outside of the state were required to pay an average of $20,797, a 329 percent difference over the average in-state tuition of $6,323.

* Students who graduated from public colleges in Montana had more debt on average than those who graduated from private colleges: $27,049 compared to $26,280, respectively.

* At public four-year colleges in Montana, 20.7 percent graduated within four years, while 45.6 percent graduated within six years. Among three neighboring states, these figures were above only those in Idaho.

### School choice[edit]

School choice is a term that refers to programs offering alternatives to assigned local public school options. Public school choice options include open enrollment policies, magnet schools, and charter schools. Other options include school vouchers, scholarship tax credits, and education savings accounts (ESAs).[7][8]

HIGHLIGHTS

* As of June 2016, Montana had not passed legislation authorizing the creation of charter schools.

* In Montana, there were 10,560 students enrolled in 140 private schools in fall 2013, accounting for roughly 6.48 percent of the state's total school-age population.

* Launched in 2015, Montana's Tax Credits for Contributions to Student Scholarship Organizations Program provides tax credits to individuals and corporations that make contributions to Student Scholarship Organizations. These organizations are nonprofits that award scholarships for private schooling and tutoring.

Proponents argue that school choice programs improve educational outcomes by expanding opportunity and access for historically disadvantaged students. In addition, advocates claim that school choice programs empower parents and improve traditional public schools through competition. Critics contend that these programs divert funds from traditional public schools, thereby generating unequal outcomes for students. In addition, some critics argue that school voucher programs wrongly direct tax dollars to religious organizations, which operate many private schools.

### Charter schools[edit]

Charter schools are public schools operated independently of public school systems. Although they are largely publicly funded, charter schools are exempt from many of the requirements imposed by state and local boards of education regarding hiring and curriculum. As public schools, charter schools cannot charge tuition or impose special entrance requirements; students are usually admitted through a lottery process if demand exceeds the number of spaces available in a school. Charter schools generally receive a percentage of the per-pupil funds from the state and local school districts for operational costs based on enrollment. In most states, charter schools do not receive funds for facilities or start-up costs; therefore, they must rely to some extent on private donations. The federal government also provides revenues through special grants. As of March 2017, 44 states and the District of Columbia had approved legislation authorizing the creation of public charter schools. Six states had not.

As of June 2016, Montana had not enacted charter school legislation.[9][10]

## Election Policy[edit]

### Ballot access requirements[edit]

In order to get on the ballot in Montana, a candidate for state or federal office must meet a variety of state-specific filing requirements and deadlines. These regulations, known as ballot access laws, determine whether a candidate or party will appear on an election ballot. These laws are set at the state level. A candidate must prepare to meet ballot access requirements well in advance of primaries, caucuses, and the general election.

There are three basic methods by which an individual may become a candidate for office in a state.

1. An individual can seek the nomination of a state-recognized political party.
2. An individual can run as an independent. Independent candidates often must petition in order to have their names printed on the general election ballot.
3. An individual can run as a write-in candidate.

This article outlines the steps that prospective candidates for state-level and congressional office must take in order to run for office in Montana. For information about filing requirements for presidential candidates, click here. Information about filing requirements for local-level offices is not available in this article (contact state election agencies for information about local candidate filing processes).

### Redistricting[edit]

Redistricting is the process by which new congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn. Montana's two United States Representative and 150 state legislators are elected from political divisions called districts. United States Senators are not elected by districts, but by the states at large. District lines are redrawn every 10 years following completion of the United States census. The federal government stipulates that districts must have nearly equal populations and must not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity.[11][12][13][14]

Montana was apportioned 2 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives after the 2020 census, 1 more than it received after the 2010 census.

HIGHLIGHTS

* Following the 2020 United States Census, Montana was apportioned two congressional districts, one more than the number it had after the 2010 census.

* Montana's House of Representatives is made up of 100 districts; Montana's State Senate is made up of 50 districts.

* In Montana, congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn by a non-politician commission.

### Voting[edit]

What's on your ballot?

Find out using Ballotpedia’s Sample Ballot Tool

* * *

* * *

Election Information
2026 election and voting dates
Voter registration
Early voting
Absentee/mail-in voting
All-mail voting
Voter ID laws
State poll opening and closing times
Time off work for voting

* * *

Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker

* * *

Select a state from the menu below to learn more about its voting policies.

AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingSubmit

The policies governing voter participation are enacted and enforced primarily at the state level. These policies, which include voter identification requirements, early voting provisions, online voter registration systems, and more, dictate the conditions under which people cast their ballots in their respective states.

This article includes the following information about voting policies in Montana:

* Voter registration details, including deadlines and eligibility requirements.
* In-person voting details, including identification requirements, poll times, and early voting provisions.
* Absentee/mail-in voting deadlines and rules.
* Details about voting rules for people convicted of a felony.
* Contact information for election agencies.

Click here for more information about election administration in the state, including voter list maintenance policies, provisional ballot rules, post-election auditing practices, and additional election policy context.

For information on elections happening this year, click here.

Do you have questions about your elections? Looking for information about your local election official? Click here to use U.S. Vote Foundation’s election official lookup tool.

## Energy Policy[edit]

### Energy information[edit]

Energy policy involves governmental actions affecting the production, distribution, and consumption of energy in a state. Energy policies are enacted and enforced at the local, state, and federal levels and may change over time. These policies include legislation, regulation, taxes, incentives for energy production or use, standards for energy efficiency, and more. Stakeholders include citizens, politicians, environmental groups, industry groups, and think tanks. A variety of factors can affect the feasibility of federal and state-level energy policies, such as available natural resources, geography, and consumer needs.

### Fracking[edit]

Read about Montana's state energy profile »

As of May 2017, there were 9,152 producing oil and natural gas wells in Montana. Of that total, there were 4,856 producing directionally and/or horizontally drilled wells that were hydraulically fractured—53 percent of producing wells. According to a December 2015 report from the Montana Farmers Union, “The vast majority of fracking wells are in eastern Montana, in the area known as the Bakken Oil Field.” The map below shows the location of the Bakken Shale formation.[15][16][17]

Map of Bakken Shale formation (click to enlarge)

## Environmental Policy[edit]

### Environmental information[edit]

Environmental policy aims to conserve natural resources by balancing environmental protection with economic growth, property rights, public health, and energy production. Federal, state, and local government entities develop and implement environmental policies through laws and regulations. This page features information about environmental policy in Montana.

### Endangered species[edit]

Endangered species policy in Montana involves the identification and protection of endangered and threatened animal and plant species. Policies are implemented and enforced by both the state and federal governments.

HIGHLIGHTS

* As of July 2016, Montana was home to 15 species—five endangered species and ten threatened species—listed under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA).

* Of these, 12 were animal species and three were plant species.

## Finance Policy[edit]

### Financial regulation information[edit]

The United States financial system is a network that facilitates exchanges between lenders and borrowers. The system, which includes banks and investment firms, is the base for all economic activity in the nation. According to the Federal Reserve, financial regulation has two main intended purposes: to ensure the safety and soundness of the financial system and to provide and enforce rules that aim to protect consumers. The regulatory framework varies across industries, with different regulations applying to different financial services.[18]

Individual federal and state entities have different and sometimes overlapping responsibilities within the regulatory system. For example, individual states and three federal agencies—the Federal Reserve, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)—regulate commercial banks. Other sectors of the financial market are regulated by specific entities.[19][20]

HIGHLIGHTS

* In 2015, there were a total of 54 distinct commercial banks in Montana, with total deposits of $21.35 billion.

* The Division of Banking and Financial Institutions is the primary regulator of financial institutions in Montana.

* In 2015, a total of 3,185 financial crimes were reported in Montana according to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN), an agency of the United States Department of Treasury.

Some, such as the Brookings Institution, argue that expanded governmental regulation of banks and financial products (e.g., mortgages) can prevent large-scale financial crises, protect consumers from abusive practices, and stabilize financial markets. Others, such as the Cato Institute, argue that over-regulation of banks of banks and financial products burdens business, stalls economic growth, and does little, if anything, to stabilize financial markets. Beyond this basic debate about the role of the government in regulating the private financial sector, there are varying opinions about the proper extent of governmental regulation.[21][22]

## Healthcare Policy[edit]

### Healthcare information[edit]

Healthcare policy in Montana involves the creation and implementation of laws, rules, and regulations for managing the state's healthcare system. The healthcare system consists of services provided by medical professionals to diagnose, treat, and prevent mental and physical illness and injury. The system also encompasses a wide range of related sectors, such as insurance, pharmaceuticals and health information technology.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the 50 state legislatures collectively "make thousands of health policy decisions each year," not including the decisions made by local governments, which often oversee hospitals, and private bodies, such as insurers. These decisions can include budget appropriations, requirements for doctors obtaining their licenses, which services are covered by insurance, how personal health information is managed, and which immunizations children must receive, among many others.[23]

Healthcare policy affects not only the cost citizens must pay for care, but also their access to care and the quality of care received, which can influence their overall health. A top concern for policymakers is the rising cost of healthcare, which has placed an increasing strain on the disposable income of consumers as well as on state budgets.

Other issues in healthcare policy include

* state Medicaid expansion,
* health information technology and privacy,
* uninsured and underinsured portions of the population,
* a shortage of primary care physicians, and
* mental healthcare access and coverage.

### Medicaid spending[edit]

Montana's Medicaid program provides medical insurance to groups of low-income people and individuals with disabilities. Medicaid is a nationwide program jointly funded by the federal government and the states. Medicaid eligibility, benefits, and administration are managed by the states within federal guidelines. A program related to Medicaid is the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which covers low-income children above the poverty line and is sometimes operated in conjunction with a state's Medicaid program. Medicaid is a separate program from Medicare, which provides health coverage for the elderly.

### Effect of the Affordable Care Act[edit]

The impact of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), also known as Obamacare, has been debated among politicians, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The ACA was signed into law in 2010 by President Barack Obama (D). The law facilitated the purchase of health insurance through a system of health insurance exchanges, tax credits, and subsidies. Initially, states were required to expand eligibility for Medicaid under the law; a 2012 ruling by the United States Supreme Court made the Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. The law also required insurers to cover healthcare services within a standard set of benefits and prohibited coverage denials based on preexisting conditions. Under the law, all individuals were required to obtain health insurance.

HIGHLIGHTS

* Between 2013 and 2016, the number of uninsured individuals in Montana declined by 49.7%.

* About 49,000 individuals in Montana were enrolled in health plans offered through the health insurance exchange in 2017. Enrollment in Medicaid amounted to about 259,000 in May 2017.

* The Kaiser Family Foundation found that between 2016 and 2017, average monthly premiums for benchmark plans on Montana's exchange increased by an average of 32% in the Billings market, from $322 to $425.

## Immigration Policy[edit]

### Immigration information[edit]

Immigration policy determines who may become a new citizen of the United States or enter the country as a temporary worker, student, refugee, or permanent resident. The federal government is responsible for setting and enforcing most immigration policy.

Meanwhile, states assume a largely supportive role, enacting their own supplementary laws and setting policies that may, for example, determine which public services immigrants can access, establish employee screening requirements, or guide the interaction between related state agencies and their federal counterparts.

Some jurisdictions, including some states, cities, and counties, have adopted policies of not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement; these jurisdictions have become known as sanctuary jurisdictions.

HIGHLIGHTS

* As of October 2016, Montana allowed lawfully residing immigrant children to enroll in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. The state did not issue drivers licenses to individuals residing in the country without legal permission.

* In 2014, Montana's population amounted to just over 1 million residents. Native-born citizens comprised 98 percent of the population, while about 1 percent of residents were naturalized citizens and 1 percent were non-citizens.

* According to the American Immigration Council, 1.9 percent of workers in Montana were immigrants in 2013.[24]

## Pension Policy[edit]

### Public pensions[edit]

Montana public pensions are the state mechanism by which state and many local government employees in Montana receive retirement benefits.

There were 99 public pension systems in Montana as of 2020. Of these, nine were state-level programs while the remaining 90 were administered at the local level. Membership in Montana's various pension systems totaled 146,705, as of fiscal year 2020. Of these, 56,413 were active members.[25]

HIGHLIGHTS

* Total contributions of $587.5 million were made to Montana's state and local pension systems, in fiscal year 2020. Of this amount, $213.7 million came from employees.

* Montana's state and local pension systems made payments totaling $939.5 million, in fiscal year 2020.

* Montana's state and local pension systems held $11.8 billion in total cash and investment holdings, as of fiscal year 2020.

## Public policy in other states[edit]

Click your state  for an overview of policy information in your state.

Choose your state...AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington, D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyoming

http://ballotpedia.org/Public policy in STATE

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ Fishman, S. & Barrett, R. (2012). Nonprofit Fundraising Registration: The 50 State Guide. NOLO.
2. ↑ Guidestar, Fundraising: What Laws Apply?" accessed February 18, 2015
3. ↑ London School of Economics, "Campaign finance laws that make small donations public may lead to fewer people contributing and to smaller donations," January 7, 2015
4. ↑ United States Census Bureau, "U.S. School System Current Spending Per Pupil by Region: Fiscal Year 2020," May 18, 2022
5. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Fast Facts: High school graduation rates," accessed September 28, 2022
6. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "College Navigator - Montana," accessed July 12, 2016
7. ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "School Choice and Charters," accessed June 18, 2014
8. ↑ Friedman Foundation for School Choice, "What is School Choice?" accessed June 18, 2014
9. ↑ National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, "Charter School Data Dashboard," accessed June 10, 2016
10. ↑ National Association of Charter School Authorizers, "State Policy," accessed June 10, 2016
11. ↑ All About Redistricting, "Why does it matter?" accessed April 8, 2015
12. ↑ Indy Week, "Cracked, stacked and packed: Initial redistricting maps met with skepticism and dismay," June 29, 2011
13. ↑ The Atlantic, "How the Voting Rights Act Hurts Democrats and Minorities," June 17, 2013
14. ↑ Redrawing the Lines, "The Role of Section 2 - Majority Minority Districts," accessed April 6, 2015
15. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `MBMG`
16. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `MFU`
17. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `wells`
18. ↑ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, "Government Performance and Results Act Annual Performance Report 2011," July 10, 2012
19. ↑ The National Bureau of Economic Research, "A Brief History of Regulations Regarding Financial Markets in the United States: 1789 to 2009," September 2011
20. ↑ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, "The U.S. Federal Financial Regulatory System: Restructuring Federal Bank Regulation," January 19, 2006
21. ↑ Brookings, "The Origins of the Financial Crisis," November 24, 2008
22. ↑ The Cato Institute, "Did Deregulation Cause the Financial Crisis?" July 2009
23. ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "Health," accessed July 8, 2015
24. ↑ American Immigration Council, "New Americans in Montana," accessed October 27, 2016
25. ↑ United States Census Bureau, 2020 Annual Survey of Public Pensions: State & Local Tables accessed February 23, 2022

v • e

State of Montana
Helena (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond
External Relations:  Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events • Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Victoria Edwards • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Thomas Grobben • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Brandon McCauley • Andrew McNair • Ellie Mikus • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox • Heather Yates