Got Questions

Christ died for
our articles about
Christianity

Schismatics

* Western (Latin) Catholicism
* Eastern (Greek) Orthodoxy
* Protestantism
* Restorationism

Devil's in the details

* True Cross
* Jesus Freaks
* Cafeteria Christianity
* Baptist
* Pope
* Answering Islam
* Graham Capill
* Mark Downey

v \- t \- e

Got Questions is a fundamentalist Christian ministry based on a question-and-answer format focusing on many of the big questions surrounding Christian doctrines, general religion, science, and what the Bible says about such things. It was founded by S. Michael Houdmann in February 2002. The website claims to have over 600,000 questions answered, and says that 75% of all questions asked will be answered "instantly."

## Contents

* 1 Point of view
* 1.1 Relative moderation
* 2 Thank God for SEO
* 3 External links
* 4 Notes
* 5 References

## Point of view[edit]

Got Questions is written from a typical (both theologically and politically) conservative Evangelical point of view, sometimes in a slightly snarky tone. To no surprise, Got Questions denies Darwinian evolution,[1] supports Young Earth Creationism (although it does not view Old Earth creationism as heretical) and seems to be highly skeptical of anthropogenic global warming.[2] The ministry is also highly supportive of Zionism.[3]

Furthermore, the website claims that "Secularism permeates all facets of our society."[4] Also, Got Questions has apparently found the foolproof methodology of proving Christianity to be the only real correct religion among the approximately 4000 which exist today.[5] This haphazard "framework" usually misrepresents every position that conflicts with theirs, among them being that Agnostics don't believe in absolute truth, Hinduism being Pantheistic, and most importantly uses the Cosmological Argument as the ultimate "Gotcha!" in its supposedly conclusive proof. The more subtle errors usually revolve around simple philosophical aspects, the most blatant example being their claim that "absolute truth" is self-defeating simply because 2+2 = 4.[6][note 1] This Straw man attempts to imply that philosophical belief systems can be absolutely proven as Arithmetical truth.

The site also believes that instead of hormone replacement therapy, reassignment surgery, or other forms of gender transition, transgender people should just get more Jesus, because according to them, gender dysphoria is just the devil feeding people lies. On top of that, they hold there are only two sexes and genders, citing Genesis 1:27, so they deny the existence of intersex and non-binary people too. But what's really insidious is how they frame their message: they're not overtly negative and hateful, they frame dysphoria as if it's a body image issue akin to feeling you're too fat or clumsy, and they do offer sympathy and comforting Bible passages—but it's only so the site can convince trans readers to deny themselves gender-affirming care.[7]

The site frequently contradicts itself on its views on homosexuality, and in one article it claims Christians should not call themselves gay, while in another it is permissive of pastors identifying as gay. They say "practicing" homosexuality is a sin, but that homosexual people who don't express their sexuality are not "practicing homosexuality", and are "same-sex attracted", not gay, which adds to the confusion. They explicitly refuse to use the common definition of homosexuality in their articles, preferring to use the erroneous definition fundamentalist Christians use instead, and they don't try to make articles on the topic succinct.

Though the website says racism is a sin, some of its articles condone racist political policies, and the site can be xenophobic. It says that illegal immigration is a "sin"[8] and that Critical Race Theory is evil and against the gospel.[9] In general, the site upholds Republican viewpoints such as reducing social programs (or what the site calls "socialism") and a strong support of the second amendment.

The site also has a sympathetic attitude towards Jack Chick, not at all addressing the paranoia and conspiracy theories found in his works. The only criticism they have is his kooky portrayal of Catholics, as even they admit the portrayal is off the rails, but they shrug it off, saying it's just a cartoon, which is apt, considering they themselves are anti-Catholic.

They are very critical about the Roman Catholic Church, referring to them as idolatrous non-Christians[10] despite being a site dedicated to answering and defending content in a compilation of books that Roman Catholics canonized.

Got Questions is written from a Calvinist point of view, although it does acknowledge there are other points of view that are within the realms of orthodoxy. Other fundie websites, of course, criticise Houdmann for his Calvinist view, with one of them awarding him a Skull and Crossbones award.[11]

### Relative moderation[edit]

Being grounded in orthodox conservative Protestant doctrine, Got Questions is generally more moderate than the variety of fundies seen on the internet, like Jack Chick's ministry and jesus-is-savior. Its articles' tone is generally the most stable of the bunch. Got Questions is in line with big Evangelical lobbying groups like Focus on the Family: some of the views are nutters, but there is a modicum of maturity compared to isolated fringe groups.

This makes for a long list of stopped clock moments, including:

* Condemning the charlatans in the prosperity gospel movement[12]
* Condemning baseless conspiracy theories like accusations that a certain president is the Antichrist and belief in the Mandela Effect[13][14]
* Condemning extreme beliefs like Dominionism, KJV only and some Charismatic practices[15][16][17]
* Condemning some excesses in the quiverfull movement[18] (while still accepting gender complementarianism)
* Encouraging some flexibility and patience in parenting with regard to corporal punishment of children[19]
* Not disliking the Jews but thankfully clarifying why the world hates the Jews: Because the world hates God.[20] Draw your own conclusions
* Condemning Angelica Zambrano's claims of going to hell.[21]

## Thank God for SEO[edit]

Got Questions's branch of Christianity is not representative of the majority of Christendom in the world or throughout history. Its Protestant beliefs are at odds with those of the most historical churches, like the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. So why, then, is it almost always the first website that pops up when you search for a Bible question?

Part of the answer is that Got Questions does good Search Engine Optimization. As a result, despite representing a small minority of Christendom, it ranks higher than comparable sites like Catholic Answers.

> So, we began to pray, how can we prevent people from visiting these unbiblical sites? In response to our prayers, God led us to search engine optimization. ... God has blessed our efforts...[22]

## External links[edit]

* Got Questions' official website
* He's too nice for some people.

## Notes[edit]

1. ↑ It's obviously 5.

## References[edit]

1. ↑ Got Questions: What are some flaws in the theory of evolution?
2. ↑ Got Questions: How should a Christian view global warming?
3. ↑ Got Questions: Should Christians support the nation of Israel?
4. ↑ Got Questions: What is secularism?
5. ↑ Adherents.com: Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents
6. ↑ Got Questions: With all of the different religions, how can I know which one is correct?
7. ↑ Got Questions: Can a person be born with the wrong gender?
8. ↑ Got Questions: What does the Bible say about illegal immigration?
9. ↑ Got Questions: What is the critical race theory?
10. ↑ Got Questions: To whom are we to pray, the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit?
11. ↑ Got Questions: Is S. Michael Houdmann a false teacher?
12. ↑ Got Questions: What does the Bible say about the prosperity gospel?
13. ↑ Got Questions: Is Barack Obama the antichrist?
14. ↑ Got Questions: What is the Mandela Effect?
15. ↑ Got Questions: What is Christian dominionism?
16. ↑ Got Questions: What is the KJV Only movement?
17. ↑ Got Questions: What is the Charismatic movement?
18. ↑ Got Questions: What are the Quiverfull and Patriarchy movements?
19. ↑ Got Questions: What does the Bible say to do with a rebellious child?
20. ↑ Got Questions: What is the cause of all the anti-Semitism in the world?
21. ↑ Got Questions: https://www.gotquestions.org/Angelica-Zambrano.html
22. ↑ Got Questions: History

v \- t \- e

Articles about apologetics and counter-apologetics

Apologetics and counter-apologetics: |  Question Evolution • Christianity is not a religion • Proof the Bible is True • Proof God is Always Right • Russell's Teapot • New Apologetics • Apologetics • Zeal of the convert • Statements that are wrong on the level of a Young Earth • Evidence for God from Science • Free will • Atheists hate god • Torah Philosophy • Answering Islam • ProphecyFilm.com • Atheist professor myth • Marian apparition • Minimal facts argument • FAQ for the Newly Deconverted • Nahom • Kuzari principle • Richard Dawkins - God Hater • God • Mara bar Serapion •
| Existence of gods: |  Religious scientists • Omnipotence paradox • Ontological argument • Presuppositionalism • Problem of evil • Transcendental argument for God • Oenological argument • God of the gaps • Evidence for God's existence • Argument from morality • Argument from molarity • Argument from first cause • Argument from fine tuning • Argument from design • Argument from beauty • Lewis Trilemma • Magic sandwich • Evil is the absence of God • Kissing Hank's Ass • The Dragon in My Garage • Intelligent design • Argument from desire • Arguments against the existence of God •
| Belief in gods: |  Pascal's wager • Spanish Inquisition • List of gods that theists don't believe in •
| Science and religion: |  Fideism • God of the gaps • Intelligent falling • Non-Overlapping Magisteria • Faith • Creation science • Accommodationism • Burwell v. Hobby Lobby • Louis Pasteur • Science and religion •
| Morality and religion: |  Just world fallacy • Divine command theory • Euthyphro dilemma • Birth as a Grave Misfortune • Responding to Sam Burke's Argument That Christianity Entails Anti-Natalism •
Scriptures: |  Book of Mormon • Dianetics • Talmud • Q gospel • Book of Mormon • Septuagint • Essene Gospel of Peace • Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ • Torah • Qur'an • New Testament • Tao Te Ching • The Urantia Book • Old Testament • Kutub al-Sittah • Holy book • Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures • Avenue Q gospel • Oahspe • A Course in Miracles • Doctrine and Covenants • Books of Enoch • Pearl of Great Price • Hadith • Bible • List of Hindu texts •
| Bible analysis: |  Apocalyptic literature • Authorship of the New Testament • Bible interpolation • Biblical sexism • Bibliolatry • Documentary hypothesis • Evidence for the Exodus • Gospels • Horizontal reading • King James Only • Pesher • Q gospel • Septuagint • Skeptic's Annotated Bible • Ten Commandments • Torah • Bible translation • Word of God • Biblical literalism • Biblical contradictions • List of mistakes made by God • Abomination • Firmament • G'Tach • Arsenokoites • Genealogy of Jesus • Nag Hammadi library • Noah's Ark • Slavery in the Bible • Examples of God personally killing people • Herod • The Brick Testament • Evidence against a recent creation • EvilBible.com • List of actions prohibited by the Bible • Biblical scientific errors •
| Qur'an analysis: |  List of actions prohibited by the Qur'an • Qur'anic scientific foreknowledge • Qur'anic scientific errors • Qur'anic contradictions • Dhu al-Qarnayn •
Apologists and counter-apologists: |  Matt Dillahunty • TheraminTrees • Hemant Mehta • Charles Templeton • Edward Current • Armoured Skeptic • DarkMatter2525 • Peter Kreeft •
| Christian apologists: |  C. S. Lewis • Jack Chick • Anselm of Canterbury • Kirk Cameron • Ray Comfort • Jonathan Sarfati • Henry Morris • Duane Gish • Andrew Snelling • Ravi Zacharias • Lee Strobel • Patrick Glynn • David Ray Griffin • R. J. Rushdoony • Gary North • Chuck Baldwin • Brian Thomas • Apologetics Press • Gary Habermas • J. P. Holding • Herb Titus • Jeffrey Tomkins • Lawrence Ford • Nathaniel Jeanson • John Morris • Tim Todd • Sye Ten Bruggencate • Randal Rauser • Timothy LaHaye • Ben Hobrink • Bible Issues • WallBuilders • L. Brent Bozell III • Rush Limbaugh • Alister McGrath • Buddy Davis • William Lane Craig • Ross Douthat • Norman Geisler • Ted Cruz • Ben Carson • Rick Perry • Pat Robertson • Joseph Farah • Theodore Beale • Mike Huckabee • One America News Network • David Wood • Edward Feser • Encyclopedia of American Loons • Dinesh D'Souza • Computing Forever • Eric Hovind • Cornelius Van Til • Frank Turek • Brittany Sellner • Ken Ham • Augustine of Hippo • Alvin Plantinga • Jair Bolsonaro • Thomas Aquinas • George Galloway • Laura Ingraham • E. Calvin Beisner • Bill Muehlenberg • Thomas Malthus • Josh McDowell • Mark Cahill • Ayaan Hirsi Ali • Kent Hovind • Creation Ministries International • Jordan Peterson • Steve Turley • G. K. Chesterton • Creation Research • Redeemed Zoomer • Walter Veith • Mike Pence •
| Muslim apologists: |  Harun Yahya • Dawah Man • Hamza Tzortzis • Zakir Naik •