Federalism

* Federalism
* Terms and definitions
* Laws
* Court cases
* Major arguments
* State responses to federal mandates
* State oversight of federal grants
* Federalism by the numbers
* Federalism by the numbers: Federal mandates
* Federalism by the numbers: Federal grants-in-aid
* Federalism by the numbers: Federal information collection requests
* Overview of federal spending during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
* Index of articles

Federalism

* * *

•Key terms
• Court cases
•Major arguments
• State responses to federal mandates
•State oversight of federal grants
• Federalism by the numbers
• Index

## Contents

* 1 Background
* 2 Types of federalism
* 3 State responses to federal mandates
* 4 Reform proposals related to federalism
* 4.1 Reform proposals related to environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) and federalism
* 4.1.1 Federal ESG mandate opposition legislation
* 4.2 Reform proposals related to the administrative state and federalism
* 5 Major arguments and areas of inquiry related to federalism
* 6 Key terms related to federalism
* 7 Key legislation related to federalism
* 8 Key court cases related to federalism
* 8.1 Federalism jurisprudence taxonomy
* 9 State oversight of federal grants
* 10 Federalism by the numbers
* 11 Federalism overviews
* 12 See also
* 13 External links
* 14 Footnotes

See also: Index of articles about federalism

What is Federalism?
Federalism in the United States is a system of government in which power is divided between the national government and state governments.

The U.S. Constitution grants specific powers to the federal government while reserving others to the states, creating a layered structure of shared authority that shapes how laws are made, enforced, and interpreted.

Why does it matter?
Federalism generates conflict over the balance of power between state and federal governments, and it has become an effective method for states to challenge federal policies they oppose. For example, there were 160 multistate lawsuits against the first Trump administration and 133 against the Biden administration.[1]

Conflicts often arise over policy issues such as ESG investing, the role of the administrative state, and work requirements for public assistance, among many others. Click here for more information on these state and federal government conflicts.

What are the key arguments?
Supporters of federalism argue that it promotes efficiency, innovation, and healthy competition between states. They believe it strengthens democracy by encouraging local decision-making and citizen participation, while also uniting a diverse nation and respecting state sovereignty.

Opponents argue that federalism can be undemocratic by giving smaller states disproportionate power. They claim it leads to inefficiencies, disparities between states, and weakens national unity.

What's the background?
The Articles of Confederation (1781), the first U.S. constitution, created a weak central government unable to tax, regulate interstate commerce, or enforce laws. These shortcomings led to economic instability and prompted the drafting of a new Constitution in 1787.[2]

The new U.S. Constitution established a federal system dividing power between the national government and the states, following debates between Federalists, who supported a stronger central government, and Anti-Federalists, who sought to protect state authority. It granted enumerated powers to the federal government, such as regulating interstate commerce, taxing, and maintaining armed forces, while the Tenth Amendment reserved powers not delegated to the federal government for the states or the people.[3][4]

Dive deeper
This article includes information about the following topics:

Background: The section explains the origins of federalism in the United States.

Types of federalism. Two of the most common types of federalism:

* Dual federalism
* Interlocking (cooperative) federalism

State responses to federal mandates: Recent legislative, regulatory, or legal actions by states to challenge obligations, known as federal mandates, placed on them by the national government.

Reform proposals related to federalism: This section tracks recent legislation by states related to federalism.

* Federal ESG mandate opposition legislation: Reforms in this category argue that state governments should oppose certain federal mandates allowing or requiring ESG considerations, especially as they relate to state investments. It also argues the federal government should move to prevent foreign governments from enforcing ESG rules on U.S. businesses.
* Reform proposals related to the administrative state and federalism: Reforms in this category enhance oversight of intergovernmental regulation by empowering governors, state attorneys general, and local governments to monitor and respond to federal and state mandates that affect state authority, operations, and local accountability.

Major arguments about federalism Ballotpedia has identified:

* Six types of arguments about what federalism is and is not.
* Ten types of arguments opposing federalism.
* Nine types of arguments supporting federalism.

Key terms related to federalism. This section features a list of terms that are important for understanding federalism.

Key legislation related to federalism. This section features a list of significant legislation related to federalism.

Key court cases related to federalism. This section features a list of important legislation related to federalism.

State oversight of federal grants. This section provides the background, key findings, federal funding data, and a 50-state overview of how states oversee federal grants.

Federalism by the numbers. This section links to relevant data on federalism, including:

* Federalism by the numbers overview
* Federal grants-in-aid
* Federal information collection requests
* Federal mandates
* Overview of federal spending during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

## Background[edit]

See also: The Federalist Papers

Prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution, the American government operated under the Articles of Confederation from March 1781 to March 1789. The Articles created a national legislature with powers to declare war, negotiate treaties, maintain an army, and coin money. However, it lacked the authority to tax or regulate commerce, and state governments retained most of their sovereignty and independence.[2][3][4]

The U.S. Constitution, which replaced the Articles, established a stronger national government and a federal system that shared power between the national government and the individual states.[3][4] The Constitution grants specific powers to the federal government, such as regulating interstate commerce, taxing, and maintaining armed forces—these are known as enumerated powers. At the same time, the 10th Amendment ensures that powers not given to the federal government are reserved for the states or the people, maintaining state authority over matters not explicitly addressed by the national government.

To address conflicts between state and federal powers, the Constitution includes mechanisms such as the Supremacy Clause in Article VI, which declares federal law to be the "supreme law of the land." This means federal law takes precedence when state laws conflict with it. The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8) further empowers Congress to make laws necessary to carry out its enumerated powers. Together, these provisions establish a balance of power between the federal government and the states, ensuring both play vital roles in governance.

## Types of federalism[edit]

There are several types of federalism, each representing different ways in which power and responsibilities are shared and balanced between the federal government and state governments, often evolving over time in response to changing political, social, and economic circumstances. Here are two of the most important forms of federalism.

* Dual federalism (also known as layer-cake federalism) is a system of governance where the federal government and state governments each have clearly defined spheres of power. Under dual federalist political systems, the federal government cannot interfere with matters delegated to state authority, and states cannot interfere with matters of federal authority.[5]

* Interlocking (cooperative) federalism (also known as marble-cake federalism or conditional federalism) refers to a system of governance where federal and state governments share power and collaborate on certain issues. Under an interlocking federal system, the national government might work with state government programs to fund colleges, pay veterans, or build transportation infrastructure.[6]

Other types of federalism include competitive federalism, horizontal federalism, market-preserving federalism, and picket-fence federalism, among others. Each type offers a different framework for understanding the relationship between federal and state powers, reflecting varied approaches to governance and policy-making.

## State responses to federal mandates[edit]

State governments may pursue legislative, regulatory, or legal actions to challenge obligations placed on them by the national government. The term federal mandate refers to any regulation or court ruling that imposes a binding obligation on a state or local government, including conditions for federal funding or unfunded mandates.[7]

Ballotpedia has tracked a list of state responses to federal mandates during the second Trump administration and the Biden administration. States most often respond to federal mandates through multistate lawsuits because coordinated litigation gives them a strong, structured way to challenge federal authority and seek relief from contested rules or actions.

## Reform proposals related to federalism[edit]

This section tracks recent legislation by states related to federalism.

### Reform proposals related to environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) and federalism[edit]

What is ESG?

ESG investing is an asset management approach that considers the environment, social issues, and corporate governance practices. It's a type of stakeholder investing, which argues shareholder returns should not be the only goal. Stakeholder investing contrasts with traditional approaches that exclusively consider financial factors like balance sheets, income statements, and valuations to maximize risk-adjusted returns (also known as shareholder investing).

#### Federal ESG mandate opposition legislation[edit]

This approach argues that state governments should oppose certain federal mandates allowing or requiring ESG considerations, especially as they relate to state investments. It also argues the federal government should move to prevent foreign governments from enforcing ESG rules on U.S. businesses.

Ballotpedia has identified the following three reform approaches opposing federal ESG mandates:

* Allow state financial officers and other executive branch officeholders to push back against federal regulations that promote ESG investing
* Prohibit federal agencies from regulating shareholder proposals and proxy meetings
* Prohibit federal agencies from requiring businesses to disclose non-material business information
* Prohibit foreign governments from enforcing rules on American companies

### Reform proposals related to the administrative state and federalism[edit]

What are the five pillars of the administrative state?

Ballotpedia's five pillars of the administrative state provide a framework for understanding the authority, influence, and actions of administrative agencies, as well as the policies and arguments surrounding them. The five pillars focus on the control of administrative agencies related to the (1) legislative, (2) executive, and (3) judicial branches of government, (4) the public, and (5) other agencies or sub-agencies.

Ballotpedia groups these into three categories: state oversight of federal regulations, state oversight of local regulations, and federal oversight of state regulations.

* State oversight of federal regulations: These reforms strengthen the authority of state officials—especially governors, legislators, and attorneys general—to monitor, contest, or influence federal agency actions that affect state policy or funding.

* State executive oversight: Proposals to enhance the role of state executives in reviewing and responding to federal agency activity and managing the use of federal funds within the state.
* State legislative oversight: Reforms that ensure state legislatures retain control over how federal regulations and federal funding are implemented within the state.
* State agency review of federal rules: Measures that give state officials more tools to oversee or resist federal rules that affect state programs and operations.

* State oversight of local regulations: These reforms define how state governments supervise or limit the regulatory authority of local governments, including through preemption and local agency accountability.

* Mandate funding and preemption: Proposals requiring reimbursement for unfunded mandates and restricting the ability of local ordinances to exceed state-level regulatory limits.
* Regulatory review and accountability: These proposals introduce checks on local lawmaking to improve transparency and reduce regulatory burden.

* Federal oversight of state regulations: These reforms address how federal agencies supervise or influence state policymaking—especially through grants, mandates, or regulatory preemption.

## Major arguments and areas of inquiry related to federalism[edit]

See also: Arguments related to federalism

Ballotpedia has tracked the following 10 arguments opposing, nine arguments supporting, and six arguments related to the nature of federalism:

What is federalism?

Click the arrow (▼) in the list below to see claims under each argument.

1. Argument: The intentions of the Framers related to federalism have been misunderstood

* Claim: A broad reading of the commerce clause centralizes too much power in Congress
* Claim: The necessary and proper clause does not grant Congress unlimited power
* Claim: Federalism was a political compromise, not an idealistic aspiration
* Claim: Citizens are granted sovereignty under the Constitution
* Claim: America’s government deviates from the Framers’ vision

2. Argument: Federalism is not the same as decentralization

* Claim: Decentralization is neither superior nor a substitute for federalism
* Claim: Decentralization, not federalism, is better at securing citizen participation, state competition, and responsive governance
* Claim: Decentralization is different from federalism and can occur without federalism

3\.  Argument: Federalism is the middle-ground between disunity and centralization

* Claim: Federalism cannot exist when government is too centralized or overly decentralized
* Claim: Decentralization can go too far
* Claim: Centralization can go too far

4. Argument: Federalism is difficult to maintain

* Claim: Only federal courts can preserve federalism
* Claim: Federal courts no longer favor federalism
* Claim: There’s no significant historical court precedent for upholding federalism
* Claim: Central control is growing stronger, local power is growing weaker, and the shift will likely continue
* Claim: Globalization contributes to centralization
* Claim: States contribute to centralization
* Claim: Corporations prefer centralization
* Claim: The federal government’s spending power and mechanisms contribute to centralization
* Claim: Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have interests in furthering centralization
* Claim: The media is a force for greater centralization

5. Argument: There is no final, perfect division of powers between federal, state, and local governments (and that is a good thing)

* Claim: Uncertainty over division of powers establishes opportunities for citizen engagement

6. Argument: Federalism is in conflict with the ideas of individual state sovereignty and federal supremacy

* If federalism is wrong or unnecessary, then why?

If federalism is wrong or unnecessary, then why?

Click the arrow (▼) in the list below to see claims under each argument.

1. Argument: The Framers were wrong to establish a federal system of government

* Claim: Federalism in the United States is outdated

2. Argument: Federalism is undemocratic

* Claim: Courts participate in judicial activism when they aim to support federalist principles by blocking democratic laws
* Claim: Federalism undermines the ability of the people to check the power of large corporations

3\.  Argument: Federalism allows for and promotes competition between states (and this is bad)

* Claim: Competition between states creates a “race to the bottom” in corporate law where states try to attract businesses to increase tax revenue and please interest groups at the expense of everyone else
* Claim: State competition can work against the adoption of other desirable policies, including welfare
* Claim: National rules are necessary to prevent undesirable effects of state competition

4. Argument: Federalism detracts from our identity as a national community

* Claim: The United States has one political community, which is a national community
* Claim: Federalism dispels the unity of public opinion

5. Argument: Federalism is an impediment to implementing the national will

* Claim: Federalism constrains the implementation of national policy
* Claim: States are not capable of handling issues with a national scope

6. Argument: Federalism fosters corruption

* Claim: Large corporations can more easily control state and local governments

7. Argument: Federalism only works for developing nations

* Claim: The stage of economic development in the United States is not suitable for federalism

8. Argument: A strong centralized government and a unified national will is necessary to check the powers of big businesses

* Claim: A unified national will protects against exploitation by big businesses
* Claim: Small units of government are at risk of being exploited by capitalism
* Claim: A centralized government protects state governments from being controlled by capitalism

9. Argument: The supposed benefits associated with federalism can be secured through administrative decentralization

10. Argument: Federalism is wasteful

If federalism is right or necessary, then why?

Click the arrow (▼) in the list below to see claims under each argument.

1. Argument: Federalism allows states to act as laboratories of democracy

* Claim: A decentralized system allows for new programs and policies to be tested on a smaller scale
* Claim: Federalism makes it possible for policies to account for local needs and conditions
* Claim: Federalism incentivizes local governments to be innovative

2. Argument: Federalism enhances democracy

* Claim: Decision-making at a lower level of government allows elected officials to directly respond to the needs of citizens
* Claim: Federalism protects liberty by allowing people to live under government that is tailored to their backgrounds
* Claim: Smaller units of government allow communities to implement policies that may not appeal to the national majority
* Claim: Local politics are less contentious than national politics due to greater homogeneity

3\.  Argument: Federalism allows for and promotes competition between states (and this is good)

* Claim: Federalism allows people and businesses to vote with their feet
* Claim: The right to exit encourages states to compete in their policy offerings to attract citizens and businesses
* Claim: Federalism incentivizes a “race to the top”

4. Argument: Federalism prevents waste

* Claim: Federalism allows states to innovate solutions based on local circumstances, which prevents waste that federal regulations often create

5. Argument: Federalism protects individual rights

* Claim: Federalism protects individual liberties of trade, investment, and migration
* Claim: Federalism allows states to create laws based on local conditions
* Claim: Federalism limits the power of the federal government to regulate individuals’ lives

6. Argument: Federalism supports stronger communities

* Claim: Federalism is good because it encourages social reciprocity
* Claim: Federalism allows states to create laws that benefit communities and specific local conditions
* Claim: Federalism promotes citizen participation in the political process

7. Argument: Federalism reduces corruption

* Claim: Federalism matches economic and political jurisdictions

8. Argument: Federalism allows people to be more active in and closer to the governing process

* Claim: Federalism creates more opportunities for non-white people to be civically active
* Claim: Federalism allows smaller organizations to have influence over powerful political groups
* Claim: Federalism offers more opportunities for individuals to actively participate in politics
* Claim: Federalism promotes social capital more readily than a nationalist form of government

9. Argument: Federalism creates the greatest opportunity for the maximization of human potential

* Claim: A federalist legal order is necessary for the greatest possible realization of human capacities

## Key terms related to federalism[edit]

See also: Terms related to federalism

This section features a list of significant terms related to federalism.

* Block grant: A type of federal grant given to states or local governments for a broad purpose, allowing for more flexibility in how the funds are spent. Block grants are a key tool in cooperative federalism, giving states more autonomy while still receiving federal funding.

* Commerce Clause: Located in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, this clause grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, which has been a key source of federal authority in shaping national policies.

* Judicial review: The power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate laws and actions by the executive or legislative branches that are deemed unconstitutional. Judicial review plays a crucial role in interpreting the limits of federal and state powers.

* Necessary and Proper Clause: Also known as the Elastic Clause, this provision in Article I, Section 8 allows Congress to pass laws that are necessary and proper to carry out its enumerated powers, thus enabling the federal government to expand its authority.

* Nullification: The idea that states have the right to invalidate federal laws they believe to be unconstitutional, a theory most famously advanced during the Nullification Crisis of the 1830s, which raised tensions between state and federal authority.

* Supremacy Clause: Found in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, it declares that federal law is the "supreme law of the land," meaning that when state laws conflict with federal laws, federal laws take precedence.

* Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: This amendment reinforces the principle of federalism by stating that any powers not delegated to the federal government nor prohibited to the states are reserved for the states or the people, emphasizing state sovereignty.

## Key legislation related to federalism[edit]

See also: Legislation related to federalism

This section features a list of significant legislation related to federalism.

* Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938: This act was a key part of the New Deal and aimed to stabilize agricultural prices by reducing surpluses. It represented a shift in federal involvement in regulating agriculture and marked the beginning of extensive federal intervention in the economy.

* Fair Labor Standards Act: Enacted in 1938, this law established minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor protections. It expanded the role of the federal government in regulating working conditions across the country.

* National Labor Relations Act: Also known as the Wagner Act (1935), it established the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively. It significantly altered the relationship between the federal government, businesses, and labor unions.

* Social Security Act of 1935: A cornerstone of the New Deal, this act created the Social Security system, providing retirement, disability, and unemployment benefits. It greatly expanded the federal government's role in providing a safety net for citizens.

* Affordable Care Act: This sweeping reform of the U.S. healthcare system aimed to increase healthcare access and reduce costs. It significantly expanded the role of the federal government in healthcare, impacting state decisions through mandates and funding.

* Sherman Antitrust Act: Enacted in 1890, it was the first federal legislation aimed at curbing monopolies and promoting competition. It laid the foundation for federal regulation of business practices and is a key component of U.S. economic policy.

## Key court cases related to federalism[edit]

See also: Court cases related to federalism

Here are some of the most important court cases related to federalism, as they have had a significant impact on the balance of power between federal and state governments:

* Gibbons v. Ogden: This landmark 1824 case established that the federal government has the authority to regulate interstate commerce, marking a broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause and strengthening federal power over the states.

* McCulloch v. Maryland: A critical 1819 case in which the Supreme Court upheld the federal government's right to establish a national bank and ruled that states could not tax federal institutions, reinforcing the principle of federal supremacy and broadening the interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause.

* South Dakota v. Dole: In 1987, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’ use of federal highway funds to encourage states to raise their legal drinking age, interpreting the General Welfare Clause as giving the federal government the power to influence state behavior through conditional funding.

* United States v. Lopez: This 1995 case marked a limit to the scope of the Commerce Clause. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress exceeded its powers under the Commerce Clause by passing a law banning firearms in school zones, asserting that some activities were beyond the federal government's reach.

* Wickard v. Filburn: In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could regulate even local economic activities (such as a farmer growing wheat for personal use) if they had a substantial effect on interstate commerce, expanding the scope of the Commerce Clause.

* National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius: This 2012 case upheld the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate but limited Congress' ability to withhold Medicaid funds from states that did not comply with the expansion of the program, marking a significant decision regarding federal power and state sovereignty.

These cases illustrate key moments in the development of federalism, where the balance of power between state and federal governments was tested and defined through judicial interpretation.

### Federalism jurisprudence taxonomy[edit]

Ballotpedia covers a wide range of federalism-related court cases, and this taxonomy shows how those cases are organized into categories, subcategories, and doctrines.

Click a category, subcategory, or doctrine below to jump directly to that section of the federalism jurisprudence taxonomy .

* Core federalism

Defines federal–state authority

* Vertical federalism
* Foundational principles and judicial review over states
* State sovereignty and anti-commandeering
* Preemption and federal immunity
* Commerce Clause
* Taxing, spending and conditional grants
* Horizontal federalism
* Federal limits on state policy
* Dormant Commerce Clause
* Privileges and Immunities Clause
* Full Faith and Credit Clause
* Interstate compacts and disputes

* Structural and institutional federalism

Federal institutions that shape state power

* Judicial power and remedies
* Standing and justiciability
* Federal jurisdiction and removal
* Venue for legal challenges
* Judicial remedies and nationwide injunctions
* State-led litigation against the federal government

* Rights-based federalism

Federal rights applied to the states

* Due process
* Incorporation (Fourteenth Amendment)
* Substantive due process
* Equal protection
* Equal protection and anti-discrimination
* Standards of review

* Cooperative and programmatic federalism

Shared governance frameworks

* Intergovernmental and cooperative regimes
* Cooperative federalism
* Federal limits on state courts (abstention / immunity)
* State participation in federal programs

## State oversight of federal grants[edit]

See also: State oversight of federal grants

Federal grants make up a significant portion of state budgets, providing funding for programs in health care, education, infrastructure, and public assistance.[8][9] These funds are typically accompanied by policy conditions or reporting requirements that shape how states implement federally funded programs. In response, states have developed varying oversight systems to review, approve, and monitor the use of federal funding.

This project includes information about the following topics, click on any section to explore it in more detail.

* Background

Summary of federal grants to states and their largest funding programs.

* Overview of state oversight of federal grants

50 state overview of state frameworks, covering governors, legislatures, agencies, and public transparency.

* Federal funding to states

Summary of how much federal funding states receive and how reliant state budgets are on federal grants.

* State-by-state oversight of federal grants

Directory of all 50 states showing their executive, legislative, and agency oversight of federal grant activity.

This section provides access to all 50 state pages on federal grant oversight. Select a state to see how it reviews, approves, and manages federal funding through its statutes, executive procedures, legislative processes, and reporting requirements.

* Alabama
* Alaska
* Arizona
* Arkansas
* California
* Colorado
* Connecticut
* Delaware
* Florida
* Georgia
* Hawaii
* Idaho
* Illinois
* Indiana
* Iowa
* Kansas
* Kentucky
* Louisiana
* Maine
* Maryland
* Massachusetts
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* Mississippi
* Missouri
* Montana
* Nebraska
* Nevada
* New Hampshire
* New Jersey
* New Mexico
* New York
* North Carolina
* North Dakota
* Ohio
* Oklahoma
* Oregon
* Pennsylvania
* Rhode Island
* South Carolina
* South Dakota
* Tennessee
* Texas
* Utah
* Vermont
* Virginia
* Washington
* West Virginia
* Wisconsin
* Wyoming

## Federalism by the numbers[edit]

This section links to relevant data on federalism, including:

* Federalism by the numbers. This page provides an overview of data about federal government mandates, grant-in-aid programs, and information collection requests.
* Federalism by the numbers: Federal grants-in-aid. Federal grants-in-aid refer to spending provided by the federal government to state and local governments, U.S. territories, and tribal governments to fund programs.
* Federalism by the numbers: Federal information collection requests. Information collection refers to a request to agencies for information that can include forms, reports, surveys, recordkeeping requirements, or public disclosures.
* Federalism by the numbers: Federal mandates. The term federal mandate refers to any regulation or court ruling that imposes a binding obligation on a state or local government, including conditions for federal funding or unfunded mandates.
* Overview of federal spending during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. This page features an overview of federal spending in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including pandemic response legislation and the major spending categories funds have been allocated to.

## Federalism overviews[edit]

This section provides overviews of key federalism topics, each separated by specific subject areas.

Federalism overviews‎ (11 P)

Court cases related to federalism

Federalism by the numbers

Index of articles about federalism

Legislation related to federalism

State oversight of federal grants

State responses to federal mandates

Terms related to federalism

Work requirements for public assistance in the states

## See also[edit]

* United States Constitution
* Articles of Confederation
* Separation of powers

## External links[edit]

* Search Google News for this topic

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ Attorneysgeneral.org, "Searchable List of Multistate Lawsuits," accessed January 28, 2025
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 History.com, "Articles of Confederation," accessed September 19, 2017
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 PBS, "Federalism," accessed September 19, 2017
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 USHistory.org, "Federalism," accessed September 19, 2017
5. ↑ Center for the Study of Federalism, "Dual Federalism," accessed July 29, 2021
6. ↑ Center for the Study of Federalism, "Cooperative Federalism," accessed July 29, 2021
7. ↑ United State Code, "§1555. 'Federal mandate' defined,” accessed June 12, 2024
8. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `census`
9. ↑ Every CRS Report, "Impacts of Federal Grants and Other Funds on State and Local Budgets", accessed August 12, 2025

v • e

Federalism

Overviews|

Federalism • Index of articles about federalism • Arguments about federalism • State responses to federal mandates • Terms related to federalism

Terms|

Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution • Supremacy Clause • Commerce Clause • Necessary and Proper Clause • Dual federalism • State sovereignty • Preemption • Unfunded mandates • Incorporation of the Bill of Rights • Sovereign immunity

Court cases|

McCulloch v. Maryland • Gibbons v. Ogden • United States v. Lopez • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius • South Dakota v. Dole • Printz v. United States • Arizona v. United States • Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization • Trump v. CASA, Inc. • Marbury et al. v. Madison

Legislation|

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act • Paperwork Reduction Act • Information Quality Act • Affordable Care Act • Every Student Succeeds Act • Gun-Free School Zones Act • Social Security Act of 1935 • National Minimum Drinking Age Act

Federal grant survey|

State survey of the federal grant review process, 2021 • State responses to the federal grant review process survey, 2021 • State responses by question to the federal grant review process survey, 2021

Federalism by the numbers|

Federalism by the numbers • Federal mandates • Federal grants-in-aid • Federal outlays to state government (2000-2019) • Federal information collection requests • Overview of federal spending during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond
External Relations:  Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events • Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Victoria Edwards • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Thomas Grobben • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Brandon McCauley • Andrew McNair • Ellie Mikus • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox • Heather Yates