Arizona election fraud

## Contents

* 1 2020 presidential election
* 1.1 Ballot destruction and vote switching
* 1.2 Equal protection violations
* 1.3 Facebook funding fraud
* 1.4 Dominion Voting Systems
* 1.5 Arizona audit
* 2 2022 midterm elections
* 3 References

### 2020 presidential election[edit]

393,017 voter identities processed in Arizona for the 2020 presidential election did not match with the Social Security Administration.[1]

On November 16, 2020, Arizona reported a 65.9% voter turnout. On November 30, 2020, the Secretary of State’s reported 79.9% voter turnout, the highest in the country according to latest aggregated results from Statista.

Arizona reported the number of ballots cast was 3,420,565 in 2020 versus 1,037,550 in 1998, or 2,383,015 more people voted in 2020 vs 1998. In the same span of time the population grew by only 1,756,24. In other words, every single new person in the state - 100% over the past twenty-two years - voted, plus an additional 166,511 more than the population growth.[2]

There was no proper signature validation of 1.9 million on mail in ballots.[3]

#### Ballot destruction and vote switching[edit]

Over 75,000 absentee ballots were reported as unreturned when they were actually returned. These absentee ballots were then either lost or destroyed (consistent with allegations of Trump ballot destruction) and/or were replaced with blank ballots filled out by election workers or other third parties.[4]

In cases where ballots were too damaged or illegible to be read by vote tabulation machines, Novus software 6.0.0.0. was used in an attempt to cure or restore the ballots. The system would do so by trying to read the applicable scans of the original rejected ballots. However, as noted in a court “the software was highly inaccurate, and it often flipped the vote....the software would erroneously prefill ‘Biden’ twice as often as it did ‘Trump.’”[5]

#### Equal protection violations[edit]

Mail-in voters had up to 5 days to “cure” or “fix” invalid mail-in ballots sent prior to Election Day. In-person voters in Maricopa County had to deal with poll workers who did not know how to work electronic voting machines properly. This resulted in thousands of in-person votes being marked incorrectly, given provisional ballots, and disregarded rather than cured.

#### Facebook funding fraud[edit]

See also: Zuckerbucks

State officers and Maricopa County Officials failed to enforce the state law against private companies from directing federal election administration, accepting millions of dollars in private grants that gave some voters in the state access to advantages that were unavailable to voters in other parts of the state. These officials also allowed for gaps in the chain of custody of official ballots through the use of “mobile” drop boxes that are stationed in unsupervised public locations, failed to enforce the state law against double voting, and failed to enforce the state law against allowing people to vote using an address where they no longer live.

As a result of these violations, data experts estimate that more than 300,000 potentially fraudulent ballots may have influenced the outcome of the popular vote in the state, including more than 200,000 illegal ballots that were counted and about 75,000 legal votes that were not counted.[6]

#### Dominion Voting Systems[edit]

See also: Dominion Voting Systems

Each Democrat party candidate was allotted 35,000 votes by rigged election machine before the voting started at 7 AM.

The Trump campaign and Republican National Committee filed a lawsuit that seeks the manual inspection of potentially thousands of in-person Election Day ballots in metro Phoenix that they allege were mishandled by poll workers and resulted in some ballot selections to be disregarded.

The legal challenge against Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs centers on instances in which people are believed to have voted for more candidates than permitted.

When tabulators detect such an “overvote,” poll workers should give voters a choice to fix the problem, but the workers instead either pressed or told voters to press a button on the machine to override the error, leaving the devices to disregard the problematic ballot selections, according to the lawsuit.[7]

A Pima county whistleblower stated that Democratic Party members invited him to a meeting on September 10, 2020 and outlined a plan to add 35,000 votes to each Democrat candidate.

"When I asked how in the world will 35,000 votes be kept hidden from being discovered, it was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the entire registered-voter range and will not exceed the registered-vote count, and the 35,000 was determined allowable in Pima County, based on our county registered-vote count.

It was also stated that total voter turnout versus total registered voters determine how many votes we can embed.

Maricopa [County] embed totals would be substantially higher than Pima’s due to embeds being based upon the total number of registered voters.

When I asked if this has been tested and how do we know it works, the answer was yes, and has shown success in Arizona judicial-retention elections since 2014, even undetectable in post-audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes in the full potential of total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters."[8]

According to testimony from an MIT-trained mathematician, Biden may have received a weighted 130% total of Democrat votes in Maricopa County to help him win the state due to an algorithm programmed into the Dominion voting machines.[9]

#### Arizona audit[edit]

The Maricopa County Election Management Systems databases were deleted after they were subpoenaed by the Arizona Senate.[10]

The Arizona audit of 2.1 million ballots from Maricopa County in the 2020 presidential election was authorized by the Arizona State Senate in February 2021.[11]

Former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency and National Security Advisor Gen. Michael T. Flynn warned of a false flag attack to divide Americans in advance of the audit results being made public.[12] Flynn warned,

"It’s going to be ugly and that creates a lot of media attraction and everybody has to cover it. What does it mean? What is it going to do? And it keeps everybody off of the election fraud. ...the truth will continue to come out. Something is going to happen. I don’t think we’re going to have to wait until the end of summer. I think it’s going to happen here fairly soon…because they must create noise prior to the Arizona audit starting to really bubble out.[13][14]

Legislators from 20 states observed the audits.[15] Results were released on September 24, 2021. The audit found:[16]

* 57,000 fraudulent ballots, five times the alleged margin of victory.
* 23,000+ phantom voters.
* Maricopa county obstruction of the audit.
* The numbers do not reconcile.
* “It appears they broke the law with the duplicate ballots.”
* We need to hold people accountable for the mistakes.
* There are significant chain of custody issues.
* Failure to preserve data files.
* Cyber security weaknesses.
* Signatures missing on the envelopes.
* Security patches have never been updated since the Aug. 6, 2019 installation of the software.
* They failed to update anti-virus definitions and failed to preserve security logs. No malware was found on the Election Management System (EMS).
* Credential management portion of the investigation showed the county allowed shared accounts and common, more easily hackable passwords.
* Devices on the network were shown to have connected to the internet, contrary to what the county and Dominion maintained. Some of the internet activity “correlated with a purge of data on the day before the audit.”
* Anonymous logins that wiped out buffers.
* Someone logged in as an administrator and deleted a lot of data.
* They caught on video whoever went in and did the file deletion. This is criminal and will be referred to AG Brnovich.

## 2022 midterm elections[edit]

See also: 2022 Midterm elections

## References[edit]

1. ↑ https://rsbnetwork.com/news/nearly-400000-voter-identities-processed-in-arizona-have-no-match-with-social-security-administration/
2. ↑ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/numbers-dont-lie-data-scientists-break-voter-fraud-arizona-shocking-video/
3. ↑ https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/11/what-youve-been-asking-for-a-fairly-complete-list-of-some-of-the-most-significant-claims-of-2020-election-miscounts-errors-or-fraud/
4. ↑ In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tyler Bowyer et al v.. Doug Ducey, December 2, 2020.
5. ↑ https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20417265/ward-v-jackson-complaint-and-petition-for-discovery.pdf
6. ↑ Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa Case No. CV 2020-096490.
7. ↑ https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/11/07/2020-latest-trump-gop-sue-in-arizona-over-ballot-handling/
8. ↑ https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/30/4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=4-takeaways-from-arizonas-election-fraud-hearing
9. ↑ Heine, Debra,“Mathematician Says Biden May Have Received 130 Percent of the Democrat Vote in Maricopa County, Arizona,” December 2, 2020.
10. ↑ https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-bombshell-maricopa-co-deleted-entire-2020-election-database-showing-results-tally-and-reporting-days-before-equipment-was-delivered-to-the-audit-this-is-spoilati/
11. ↑ https://tucson.com/news/arizona_news/senate-panel-oks-bill-requiring-counties-to-disclose-information-on-voting-machines-systems/article_66e6fb94-91f8-56ef-ba82-ce723795e8c4.html
12. ↑ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/gen-michael-flynn-something-going-happen-must-create-noise-arizona-audit-going-something-video/
13. ↑ https://rumble.com/vizu3b-gen.-flynn-something-is-going-to-happen.-they-must-create-noise-before-the-.html
14. ↑ https://www.steeltruth.com/?wix-vod-video-id=a6e724f6431e4f90bbf81b0b16215bc0&wix-vod-comp-id=comp-kl5lh1zq
15. ↑ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/06/15/arizona-audit-full-list-republican-lawmakers-who-visited-coliseum/7698855002/
16. ↑ https://uncoverdc.com/2021/09/24/maricopa-county-audit-report-over-57k-votes-in-question/

v • d • e

Election Fraud

Types of Election Fraud|

Arizona audit • Ballot harvesting • Democrat election fraud • Georgia election fraud • Michigan election fraud • Pennsylvania election fraud • Wisconsin election fraud • Hammer and Scorecard • Ranked-choice voting

Individuals Fighting Election Fraud|

Shiva Ayyadurai • Lauren Boebert • Jair Bolsonaro • Mark Brnovich • Patrick Byrne • Fernando Cerimedo • Rudy Giuliani • Louis Gohmert • Mike Lindell • John R. Lott • Peter Navarro • Ken Paxton • Sidney Powell • Donald Trump • Kelli Ward • Lin Wood

Election Integrity|

Alternate Electors • Electoral Count Act • Election integrity • Judicial Watch • Look Ahead America • Objectors to Biden Electors • True the Vote • Florida election integrity

Groups Undermining Traditional Election Integrity|

ACORN • Biden junta • Center for Tech and Civic Life • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative • CNN • CCP • Democratic National Committee • Dominion Voting Systems • NextGen America • Open Society Foundations • Pelosi Panel • Perkins Coie • Priorities USA • Quadrivium • Smartmatic • Transition Integrity Project •

Bills Undermining Election Integrity|

For the People Act • John Lewis Voting Rights Act •

Court cases|

Kelly v. Pennsylvania • United States v. Throckmorton • Burson v. Freeman • Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee •