Safe Drinking Water Act

* * *

* * *

State environmental policy
U.S. environmental policy
Endangered species policy
State endangered species
Federal land policy
Environmental terms

The Safe Drinking Water Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Gerald Ford (R) in 1974. Its purpose is to "establish standards and treatment requirements for public water supplies, control underground injection of wastes, finance infrastructure projects, and protect sources of drinking water," according to the Congressional Research Service.[1][2]

Enforcement is divided between the federal government and the states. States have authority to implement and enforce drinking water regulations if they adopt standards that mirror national requirements, adopt adequate enforcement mechanisms, conduct water system monitoring, and maintain records and compliance information. As of March 2017, 49 states (all but Wyoming) had primary authority over public water systems.[1][2]

## Contents

* 1 Background
* 1.1 Legislative history
* 2 Provisions
* 2.1 National drinking water standards
* 2.1.1 State authority
* 2.2 Unregulated contaminants
* 2.3 Underground injection control programs (UIC)
* 2.4 Lead in drinking water
* 3 Public water systems by state
* 4 Drinking water and hydraulic fracturing
* 4.1 Fracking overview
* 4.2 Fracking regulation under SDWA
* 4.3 EPA study of fracking (2015-2016)
* 5 Recent
* 6 See also
* 7 Footnotes

## Background[edit]

The Safe Drinking Water Act was enacted in 1974 and amended in 1986, 1996, and 2016. The act established programs for drinking water standards and water treatment requirements for public water supplies, authorized federal funding for drinking water infrastructure projects, and enabled federal regulation of underground injection of fluids to protect underground drinking water supplies.[1][2][3]

Enforcement is divided between the federal government and the states. States have authority to implement and enforce drinking water regulations if they adopt standards that mirror national requirements, adopt adequate enforcement mechanisms, conduct water system monitoring, and maintain records and compliance information. As of March 2017, 49 states had primary authority over public water systems. The original 1974 act gave the EPA discretionary authority to regulate drinking water contaminants and gave states primary authority for implementing and enforcing the act's requirements on public water supplies.[1][3]

The 1986 amendments required the EPA to regulate 83 specific contaminants by June 1989 and 25 additional contaminants every three years after 1989. The act also established federal standards for disinfecting and filtrating public water supplies, requirements for reducing the use of lead pipes in new drinking water systems, federal grants to states and localities for groundwater protection programs, and federal regulation and monitoring of underground injection of wastes below drinking water sources.[1][3][4]

In the 1996 amendments, Congress eliminated the requirement that the EPA regulate 25 new contaminants per year and instead required the EPA to select new contaminants for regulation based on their health risks, occurrence in public water systems, and the estimated risk reductions that may result from regulation. The amendments also established a revolving drinking water grant fund; states distribute federal grants to localities for water infrastructure improvements and for compliance with drinking water standards.[1][3][5]

In the 2016 amendments, Congress authorized new grant programs for public water systems in low-income communities (following the drinking water crisis in Flint, Michigan), for lead pipe replacements, and for voluntary lead testing at schools and daycare facilities.[6]

### Legislative history[edit]

Sen. Warren Magnuson (D-Washington) introduced the Safe Drinking Water Act on January 18, 1973. The Senate passed its version of the bill on June 22, 1973. The House of Representatives passed its version on November 19, 1974. The Senate amended the House bill before passing it again. The House agreed to the amended Senate bill on December 3, 1974, and the law was signed by President Gerald Ford (R) on December 16, 1974.[7]

In remarks delivered at the signing ceremony for the SDWA, Ford said:[8]

“  | [The Safe Drinking Water Act] will enhance the safety of public drinking water supplies in this country through the establishment and enforcement of national drinking water standards. The Environmental Protection Agency has the primary responsibility for establishing our national standards. The States have the primary responsibility of enforcing them and for otherwise ensuring the quality of drinking water. ... Nothing is more essential to the life of every single American than clean air, pure food, and safe drinking water. There have been strong national programs to improve the quality of our air and the purity of our food. This bill will provide us with the protection we need for drinking water.[9] | ”

|
|

—President Gerald Ford[10]

## Provisions[edit]

### National drinking water standards[edit]

See also: Drinking water quality

The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 required the EPA to issue national drinking water standards to limit any contaminants that may pose health risks or are likely to be found in public water supplies. Federal standards apply to all privately and publicly owned water systems that regularly service at least 25 people. The EPA selects and regulates contaminants based on the following criteria:[1][2][3][11]

* Potential adverse health effects
* A high likelihood that a contaminant will be found in public water systems at a level and frequency that could affect public health
* Probability that regulating a contaminant will reduce health risks for people who regularly use public water systems

Contaminants regulated through national drinking water standards include microorganisms (such as harmful bacteria), radionuclides (such as cancer-causing chemicals), organic chemicals (such as benzene and pesticides), and inorganic chemicals (such as arsenic and lead). The EPA sets maximum contaminant levels at which no known or anticipated adverse health effects occur in individuals.[1][11]

As of March 2017, national drinking water regulations applied to approximately 152,700 privately and publicly owned drinking water systems. Of that total, 51,350 water systems—approximately 34 percent of regulated systems—served the same residences year-round.[1]

#### State authority[edit]

The act gave state governments primary enforcement and oversight authority over public water systems (if the EPA determines a state has met the act's requirements). In addition, the 1996 amendments authorized $100 million per year in grants (between fiscal years 1997-2003) to states for administering the Public Water Supply Supervision (PWSS) Program, which is the main program for regulating public water systems.[3]

### Unregulated contaminants[edit]

The act required the EPA to maintain a public list of unregulated contaminants that are known or could be found in public water systems and that may require regulation. The agency must monitor these contaminants and collect data on their occurrence in public water systems. Every five years, the EPA must publish its list of monitored contaminants and determine whether or not to regulate at least five contaminants on the list.[12][13]

### Underground injection control programs (UIC)[edit]

The act authorized underground injection control programs (UIC programs) to prevent contamination of groundwater, which seeps into the ground and accumulates in rock beneath the Earth's surface; groundwater is also a common drinking water source. These programs apply to injection wells, which are human-made devices to discharge fluids or collect material underground. Wells regulated under these programs include municipal waste disposal wells, oil and natural gas-related wells, wells used to extract and dissolve minerals, radioactive and hazardous injection wells, and wells to discharge non-hazardous fluids into or above groundwater.[3][14][15]

The EPA sets minimum requirements for the UIC program, and state governments have primary enforcement authority over the program (the EPA can revise or revoke state UIC programs if they do not meet minimum federal requirements). As of June 2017, 34 states had primary authority over all underground injection wells regulated under the act. Seven states had primary authority over just oil and natural gas-related wells.[16][17]

### Lead in drinking water[edit]

The act included the following requirements on lead and drinking water supplies:[1][3]

* The act restricted the amount of lead in pipes and plumbing equipment used to deliver drinking water. Specifically, the act (which was partially amended by the Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act of 2011) prohibited the use of pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings, and fixtures that contain more than a weighted average of 0.25 percent lead. States have primary regulatory authority over this provision.
* In the 1986 amendments, Congress required public water system owners or operators to notify individuals who may be affected by lead in drinking water supplies caused by construction materials that were used to build the system or because the water was corrosive.
* In the 1996 amendments, Congress directed the EPA to issue standards limiting the amount of lead that may leach from new plumbing fittings or fixtures unless a voluntary industry standard was established within one year (an industry standard was established).

## Public water systems by state[edit]

See also: Water systems in the United States

Three types of public water system exist in the United States:[18]

* Community water systems deliver water to the same residences year-round.
* Non-transient non-community water systems regularly supply water to at least 25 of the same people for six months per year. These systems include schools, factories, office buildings, and hospitals. Such facilities may have their own on-site water systems.
* Transient non-community water systems provide water for certain areas where people do not remain for a long period of time, such as gas stations or campgrounds. These systems are open at least 60 days per year.

The table below shows the number of public water systems (defined as systems that supply drinking water to at least 25 people) by state. Wisconsin had the most water systems (11,641), and Hawaii had the fewest water systems (134).

Public drinking water systems by state (as of 2015)

State  | Public water systems (2015)
Alabama | 588
Alaska | 1,490
Arizona | 1,532
Arkansas | 1,064
California | 7,758
Colorado | 2,005
Connecticut | 2,496
Delaware | 501
Florida | 5,524
Georgia | 2,409
Hawaii | 134
Idaho | 1,962
Illinois | 5,575
Indiana | 4,164
Iowa | 1,888
Kansas | 1,001
Kentucky | 445
Louisiana | 1,386
Maine | 1,923
Maryland | 3,459
Massachusetts | 1,760
Michigan | 11,269
Minnesota | 7,017
Mississippi | 1,211
Missouri | 2,761
Montana | 2,169
Nebraska | 1,333
Nevada | 585
New Hampshire | 2,475
New Jersey | 3,772
New Mexico | 1,106
New York | 8,747
North Carolina | 5,867
North Dakota | 652
Ohio | 4,723
Oklahoma | 1,708
Oregon | 2,546
Pennsylvania | 8,925
Rhode Island | 488
South Carolina | 1,423
South Dakota | 648
Tennessee | 872
Texas | 6,942
Utah | 1,032
Vermont | 1,408
Virginia | 2,744
Washington | 4,402
West Virginia | 965
Wisconsin | 11,641
Wyoming | 799
United States total† | 149,294
† Note: Total includes only 50 states and excludes U.S. territories
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "National Drinking Water Activity Dashboard"

## Drinking water and hydraulic fracturing[edit]

See also: Fracking in the United States

### Fracking overview[edit]

Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is a method of oil and natural gas extraction. The process involves injecting fluid into subterranean rock formations at high pressure. The high pressure fluid produces a fracture network that allows crude oil and natural gas inside dense rocks to flow into a wellbore and be extracted at the surface. The fluid (known as frac fluid) contains between 98 percent and 99.5 percent water and sand; between 0.5 percent and 2 percent of the fluid is composed of chemical additives, which are used to stop the growth of microorganisms, prevent well casing corrosion, increase the rate at which the fluid is injected, and reduce pressure, among other uses.[19][20]

While all oil and gas activities, including hydraulic fracturing, must meet federal requirements outlined in the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and other federal environmental laws, states have primary regulatory authority over fracking. States with fracking regulate the location and spacing of wells, drilling methods, lining of wells, the process of fracking itself, plugging wells, waste disposal, and site reclamation. States can allow their environmental regulatory agency to regulate fracking; other states regulate fracking through their oil and gas commissions.[21]

### Fracking regulation under SDWA[edit]

After Congress passed the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), the EPA interpreted the law to exclude fracking from regulation under the underground injection program for oil and natural gas-related wells, arguing that the purpose of fracking was to extract natural gas and not to inject fluids into a well. In 1997, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled that the use of fracking to extract coalbed methane in Alabama was underground injection subject to Safe Drinking Water Act regulations.[20][22]

After the ruling, the EPA studied the potential health and safety impacts on drinking water supplies by fracking for coalbed methane, concluding in 2004 that risks were minimal (unless diesel fuel was used) and that federal fracking regulation was unnecessary.[20][23]

In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress revised the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) to exclude "the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities” from the Safe Drinking Water Act's requirements for the underground injection control (UIC) program. The 2005 act effectively permitted state governments to regulate fracking as the process relates to underground drinking water sources, though state regulations must meet the minimum requirements outlined in all applicable federal laws, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and others.[20][24]

### EPA study of fracking (2015-2016)[edit]

Congress in 2010 directed the EPA to review available research on the impacts of fracking on drinking water resources. The EPA study plan was released in November 2011, and the final report was released in December 2016.[25] The total cost of the study was $29 million.[26][27]

A review draft of the report was issued in June 2015, along with a press release headlined: “Assessment shows hydraulic fracturing activities have not led to widespread, systemic impacts to drinking water resources and identifies important vulnerabilities to drinking water resources.”[28]

Following release of the draft, the EPA’s Science Advisory Board (SAB) reviewed the report and submitted comments to the agency. In its 180 pages of comment, the board questioned the basis for the draft conclusion, stating, “The SAB finds that the EPA did not support quantitatively its conclusion about lack of evidence for widespread, systemic impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, and did not clearly describe the system(s) of interest (e.g., groundwater, surface water), the scale of impacts (i.e., local or regional), nor the definitions of ‘systemic’ and ‘widespread.’”[29]

The conclusion in the EPA's final report published in December 2016 stated:

“  | The available data and information allowed us to qualitatively describe factors that affect the frequency or severity of impacts at the local level. However, significant data gaps and uncertainties in the available data prevented us from calculating or estimating the national frequency of impacts on drinking water resources from activities in the hydraulic fracturing water cycle. The data gaps and uncertainties described in this report also precluded a full characterization of the severity of impacts.[30][9] | ”

|
|

Both the draft and final reports noted that fracking has led to local-level impacts on drinking water resources in some instances. However, the final report concluded that data gaps prevented researchers from reaching a conclusion on broader impacts while the draft report noted no evidence of widespread impact.[31][32]

For more information on the EPA's study of fracking and drinking water supplies, see this article.

## Recent[edit]

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Safe Drinking Water Act. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

Safe Drinking Water Act - Google News

## See also[edit]

* Environmental policy in the U.S.

* Energy policy in the U.S.

* Endangered species policy in the U.S.

* Drinking water quality
* Glossary of environmental terms

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Congressional Research Service, "Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA): A Summary of the Act and Its Major Requirements," March 1, 2017
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act," accessed July 10, 2017
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 U.S. Government Printing Office, "Title XIV of The Public Health Service Act: Safety of Public Water Systems (Safe Drinking Water Act)," accessed July 7, 2017
4. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Safe Drinking Water Act - 1986 Amendments," accessed July 8, 2017
5. ↑ U.S. Congress, "Public Law 104-182," accessed July 11, 2017
6. ↑ U.S. Congress, "Summary: H.R.6116 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)," accessed June 30, 2017
7. ↑ The Library of Congress, "Bill Summary & Status - 93rd Congress (1973 - 1974) - S.433 - All Congressional Actions with Amendments," accessed January 16, 2015
8. ↑ Gerald Ford Library and Museum, "Gerald R. Ford's Statement on Signing the Safe Drinking Water Act," December 17, 1974
9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
10. ↑ Gerald Ford Library and Museum, "Gerald R. Ford's Statement on Signing the Safe Drinking Water Act," December 17, 1974
11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Drinking Water Regulations and Contaminants," accessed July 11, 2017
12. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Basic Information on the CCL and Regulatory Determination," accessed January 29, 2015
13. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Basic Information on the CCL and Regulatory Determination," accessed January 29, 2015
14. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Protecting Underground Sources of Drinking Water from Underground Injection (UIC)," accessed June 22, 2017
15. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Primary Enforcement Authority for the Underground Injection Control Program," accessed July 1, 2017
16. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "General Information About Injection Wells," accessed July 2, 2017
17. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Underground Injection Control Regulations," accessed July 2, 2017
18. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Drinking Water Dashboard Help," accessed April 10, 2016
19. ↑ Frack Wire, “What is Fracking,” accessed January 28, 2014
20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 Congressional Research Service, "Hydraulic Fracturing and Safe Drinking Water Act Regulatory Issues," July 13, 2015
21. ↑ Groundwater Protection Council, "State oil and natural gas regulations designed to protect water resources," May 2009
22. ↑ Legal Information Institute, "42 U.S. Code Section 300h - Regulations for State programs," accessed February 10, 2017
23. ↑ Stanford Law School Student Journals, "Local Government Fracking Regulations: A Colorado Case Study," January 2014
24. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Natural Gas Extraction - Hydraulic Fracturing," accessed March 10, 2014
25. ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Hydraulic Fracturing Study Timeline,” updated June 2015
26. ↑ Ballotpedia staff, "Phone interview with EPA press secretary Monica Lee," December 20, 2016
27. ↑ United States Government Publishing Office, “Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010,” October 28, 2009
28. ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency, “EPA Releases Draft Assessment on the Potential Impacts to Drinking Water Resources from Hydraulic Fracturing Activities,” June 4, 2015
29. ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Subject: SAB Review of the EPA’s Draft Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources,” August 11, 2016
30. ↑ Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; no text was provided for refs named `final`
31. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (Final Report)," accessed December 13, 2016
32. ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "EPA Releases Final Report on Impacts from Hydraulic Fracturing Activities on Drinking Water," December 13, 2016

v • e

Environmental Policy

Background|

Environmental policy in the United States • Clean Air Act • Clean Water Act • Conservation • Endangered Species Act • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • Enforcement at the EPA • Glossary of environmental terms • Energy and environmental news

* * *

Energy and environmental news|

January 2015 • February 2015 • March 2015 • April 2015 • May 2015 • June 2015 • July 2015 • August 2015 • September 2015 • October 2015 • November 2015 • December 2015

* * *

Environmental terms|

Air pollutants • Air Quality Index • BLM grazing permit • Carbon dioxide • Carbon footprint • Clean Air Act • Clean Water Act • Climate change • ConservAmerica • Cross State Air Pollution Rule • Deep ecology • Ecology • Endangered species • Implementation of the Endangered Species Act • Environmental chemistry • Environmental engineering • Environmental health • Environmental restoration • Environmental science • Federal land • Fracking • Greenhouse effect • Greenhouse gas • Ground-level ozone standards • Ground water • Hazardous air pollutant • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change • Keystone XL • Mercury and air toxics standards • Municipal solid waste • National Ambient Air Quality Standards • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System • National Priorities List of Superfund sites • National Wildlife Federation • Natural resources • Nonpoint source of water pollution • Oil • Ozone • Pesticide • Petroleum • Point source of water pollution • Public water system • Radioactive waste • Renewable energy resources • Renewable Portfolio Standards • Solar energy • State park • Superfund • Traditional energy resources • U.S. Bureau of Land Management • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • U.S. Forest Service • U.S. Geological Survey • Wastewater treatment • Water quality criteria • Wetland • Wilderness Act • Wilderness Society • Wind energy

* * *

Endangered species terms|

Candidate species • Critical habitat • Delisting • Distinct population segment • Endangered species • Listed species • Listing a species • Listing petition • Species recovery • Taking a species

* * *

Environmental policy by state|

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

* * *

Endangered species policy|

Costs of listing a species • Delisting a species • Endangered Species Act litigation • Endangered species policy in the United States • Endangered Species Act litigation • History of the Endangered Species Act • Private property and the Endangered Species Act • Science and the Endangered Species Act • Success rate of the Endangered Species Act • Transparency and the Endangered Species Act

* * *

Endangered species policy by state|

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

* * *

Environmental statistics|

Payments in lieu of taxes • Land ownership by state • Grazing permits on BLM lands • Federal land ownership by state • BLM oil and gas permits by state • Environmental spending in the 50 states • Greenhouse gas emissions by state • Superfund sites in the United States • National Park Visitor Spending Effects Report

* * *

Endangered species statistics|

Endangered species by state • Endangered animals by state • Endangered plants by state • Delisted species • Top 20 federally funded species • Land acquisition funding for endangered species • Federal endangered species grants by state

* * *

Ballotpedia

About

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, Founder and CEO • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer

Communications: Alison Graves, Director of Communications • Carley Allensworth • Abigail Campbell • Sarah Groat • Nathaniel Harwood • Dillon Redmond
External Relations:  Geoff Pallay, Director of External Relations • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy • Ashley Fleming • Thomas Mardik • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski, Director of Operations • Amanda Herbert • Mandy Morris • Caroline Presnell • Kelly Rindfleisch
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Director of Technology Operations • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Beth Dellea • Travis Eden • Tate Kamish • Margaret Kearney • Eric Lotto • Joseph Sanchez • Mary Susmitha

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial Content

Josh Altic, Director of Content • Daniel Anderson, Associate Director of Elections & Data • Cory Eucalitto, Associate Director of Features • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor of Ballot Measures • Mandy McConnell, Managing Editor of News • Doug Kronaizl, Managing Editor of Local Expansion • Abbey Smith, Managing Editor of Elections • Janie Valentine, Managing Editor of Law • Joel Williams, Managing Editor of Events • Joseph Greaney, Managing Editor of Policy • Andrew Bahl • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Joseph Brusgard • Emma Burlingame • Kelly Coyle • Jon Dunn • Victoria Edwards • Thomas Ellis • Nicole Fisher • Thomas Grobben • Brianna Hosea • Molly Kehoe • Tyler King • Glorie Martinez • Norm Leahy, Senior Editor • Nathan Maxwell • Brandon McCauley • Andrew McNair • Ellie Mikus • Mackenzie Murphy • Kaley Platek • Samantha Post • Adam Powell • Annelise Reinwald • Spencer Richardson • Victoria Rose • Briana Ryan • Myj Saintyl • Maddy Salucka • Emma Soukup • Alexis Thacker • Mina Vogel • Samuel Wonacott • Trenton Woodcox • Heather Yates