Tamalpais Union High School District, California, Measure B, Parcel Tax (March 2020)

Tamalpais Union High School District Measure B

Election date
March 3, 2020
Topic
California parcel tax
Status
d Defeated
Type
Referral| Origin
Lawmakers

* * *

List of California measuresCalifornia Proposition 13 (March)California Proposition 14California Proposition 15California Proposition 16California Proposition 17California Proposition 18California Proposition 19California Proposition 20California Proposition 21California Proposition 22California Proposition 23California Proposition 24California Proposition 25Submit

* * *

A parcel tax renewal and increase measure was on the ballot for Tamalpais Union High School District voters in Marin county, California, on March 3, 2020.[1] It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported extending the district's existing $455 annual parcel tax through July 2030, and adding $190 per parcel, for a new total annual parcel tax of $645 per parcel.

A "no" vote opposed extending the district's existing $455 annual parcel tax through July 2030, and adding $190 per parcel, for a new total annual parcel tax of $645 per parcel.

A two-thirds (66.67 percent) supermajority vote was required for the approval of Measure B.

## Contents

* 1 Election results
* 2 Text of measure
* 2.1 Ballot question
* 2.2 Impartial analysis
* 2.3 Full text
* 3 Support
* 3.1 Arguments
* 4 Opposition
* 4.1 Arguments
* 5 Path to the ballot
* 6 See also
* 7 External links
* 8 Footnotes

## Election results[edit]

Tamalpais Union High School District Measure B

Result | Votes | Percentage
Yes | 36,296 | 63.84%

| 20,563 | 36.16%

Results are officially certified.
Source

## Text of measure[edit]

### Ballot question[edit]

The ballot question was as follows:[1]

“  |

To maintain high quality education with local funding that cannot be taken by the State, shall Tamalpais Union High School District maintain excellent science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing instruction; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; and support music and art by adopting a measure renewing funding at the current $455 rate and adding $190 per parcel, providing $23 million annually for 10 years, with senior exemptions, cost of living adjustments, independent oversight and all funds for Tamalpais Union High School District students?[2]

| ”

|
|

### Impartial analysis[edit]

The following impartial analysis of the measure was prepared by the office of the Marin County Counsel:[1]

| “  |

If this Measure is approved by two-thirds of the votes cast on this special tax proposal, the Tamalpais Union High School District will be authorized to levy an annual qualified special tax of $645 per parcel of taxable real property, beginning July 1, 2020, for a maximum of 10 years, with 3% annual increases to account for increases in the cost of living. This special tax, if approved by voters, will supersede and replace the existing special taxes authorized by voters as Measure B in November 2011 and Measure J in November 2018, as of July 1, 2020.

The estimated revenue from this tax is approximately $23,000,000 annually. This Measure states that proceeds of the tax will be used for attracting and retaining teachers, maintaining academic and arts programs, and supporting college preparation and career-development programs for students. Proceeds will be controlled locally, reviewed by an independent citizen oversight committee, and may not be used for administrative salaries or benefits.

The Measure provides that exemptions from payment of the special tax may be granted for certain property owners aged 65 years and older as well as certain persons receiving Supplemental Security Income for a disability or Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits.

This Measure was placed on the ballot by the Board of Trustees of the Tamalpais Union High School District.[2]

| ”

|
|

### Full text[edit]

The full text of the measure is available here.

## Support[edit]

### Arguments[edit]

The following was the official argument in support of Measure B:[1]

| “  |

Vote YES on B to prevent devastating cuts to Tamalpais Union High School District schools.

Drake, Redwood, Tam, San Andreas and Tamiscal High Schools provide an outstanding education to local students, thanks to local funding that provides $16.8 million each year and accounts for 17% of the budget. This expiring local funding keeps qualified and experienced teachers in the classroom and protects high-quality academics.

Our District has taken every step to manage its budget wisely and just received an AAA credit rating - the highest rating possible - from Moody’s Investors Service when refinancing bonds to save taxpayers $4 million. In the past two years, the District cut nearly $6 million from the budget by cutting administrators, reducing staff and capping benefits. Any further cuts will have a direct impact on the classroom.

In addition, due to rising student enrollment our District needed to hire over 70 teachers - yet no additional funding comes from the State to cover these costs. Furthermore, unfunded State-mandated costs continue to rise.

This is why your YES vote is important. Measure B renews and increases expiring local funding and prevents devastating cuts equivalent to laying off 114 teachers. Every penny is locally-controlled and directly supports students.

Vote YES on B

Maintain high-quality science, technology, engineering, math, reading and writing instruction Attract and retain high-quality teachers Support music and art programs Maintain college preparation programs Maintain career-development and vocational jobtraining programs Oversight and Local Control are Required

Every penny stays local No funds can be taken by the State Independent citizen oversight and audits are required No funds can support administrator salaries Seniors will continue to be eligible for an exemption from the cost Join parents, teachers, community leaders, seniors and business leaders in voting YES on B to maintain our outstanding schools and prevent teacher layoffs.[2]

| ”

|
|

## Opposition[edit]

### Arguments[edit]

The following was the official argument in opposition to Measure B:[1]

| “  |

Voters should reject Measure B, an unfair and unaffordable ten-year parcel tax renewal and dramatic increase. Your taxes start at $645 a year, increasing 3% annually, reaching $842 in 10 years. Up from $300 just 2 years ago.

Voters passed a $149 second parcel tax for TUHSD in 2018 (on top of the larger existing one). TUHSD is adding back costs reduced just last year and wants another $190! Measure B is unfair because it’s a flat rate. A studio pays the same as a mansion, mall or apartment complex. TUHSD says this tax hike request was always part of the plan. This was not disclosed to voters who approved Measure J 16 months ago. Rising enrollment is the supposed reason for a higher tax. But their own study shows enrollment declines start in 3 years. No 10-year financial forecast justifies the proposed 10-year tax. Pension expenses are why we’re facing so many tax measures. TUHSD must lobby Sacramento for reform instead of hitting homeowners with increasing parcel taxes. Seniors and medically disabled: Though you can get an exemption from this tax, it DOES harm you. Your friends, neighbors, and caregivers are forced out by unaffordability. Your kids can’t live nearby. Higher taxes don’t help property values, and they threaten your quality of life. Don’t believe threats of teacher layoffs and rising class sizes. Current parcel taxes don’t expire until 2022, giving the District time to rethink its needs and present a fairer, more affordable proposal.

The Coalition of Sensible Taxpayers supported 2018’s Measure J as a 4-year urgent measure for a school district threatened by insolvency. With 2018 Measure J’s $5 million annual infusion, TUHSD hasn’t made the case for a much higher tax lasting 10 years. CO$T OPPOSES Measure B.

VOTE NO.[2]

| ”

|
|

## Path to the ballot[edit]

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in California

This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the Board of Trustees of Tamalpais Union High School District.[1]

## See also[edit]

Local measures

* Local measures in 2020
* California parcel tax on the ballot

* Marin County measures
* Parcel tax

California

* March 3, 2020 measures in California
* Local ballot measures, California
* Tamalpais Union High School District, California
* Parcel tax elections in California

News and analysis

* State and local preemption conflicts
* Measures advancing national agendas

|
|

## External links[edit]

| Suggest a link

|

* Search Google News for this topic
* Marin County Elections Office website

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Marin County, "March 3, 2020 - List of Measures," accessed February 25, 2020
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.

v • e

Local ballot measures in California

Counties|

Alameda • Alpine • Amador • Butte • Calaveras • Colusa • Contra Costa • Del Norte • El Dorado • Fresno • Glenn • Humboldt • Imperial • Inyo • Kern • Kings • Lake • Lassen • Los Angeles • Madera • Marin • Mariposa • Mendocino • Merced • Modoc • Mono • Monterey • Napa • Nevada • Orange • Placer • Plumas • Riverside • Sacramento • San Benito • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Francisco • San Joaquin • San Luis Obispo • San Mateo • Santa Barbara • Santa Clara • Santa Cruz • Shasta • Sierra • Siskiyou • Solano • Sonoma • Stanislaus • Sutter • Tehama • Trinity • Tulare • Tuolumne • Ventura • Yolo • Yuba

* * *

Analysis|

Laws governing local ballot measures in California • Ballot measure information on California county websites • Costs of administering local elections • Required approval rates for local California ballot measures

* * *

2022|

April 12 •

* * *

2021|

March 2 • May 4 • June 8 • June 29 • August 31

* * *

2020|

March 3 • April 14 • May 5 • June 2 • June 23 • August 25 • November 3

* * *

2019|

February 26 • March 5 • March 19 • March 26 • April 9 • May 7 • June 4 • August 27 • November 5

* * *

2018|

January 23 • January 30 • February 27 • March 6 • June 5 • November 6

* * *

2017|

January 10 • February 28 • March 7 • March 28 • April 4 • April 11 • May 2 • May 9 • May 16 • June 6 • July 11 • August 22 • August 29 • October 17 • November 7

* * *

2016|

January 26 • February 23 • March 8 • April 12 • April 19 • May 3 • June 7 • November 8

* * *

2015|

January 6 • February 24 • March 3 • March 10 • March 24 • April 14 • May 5 • May 19 • June 2 • June 23 • August 25 • September 1 • October 6 • November 3 • November 17

* * *

2014|

February 4 • February 11 • March 4 • April 8 • May 6 • June 3 • July 8 • September 2 • November 4

* * *

2013|

March 5 • March 12 • April 2 • April 9 • May 7 • May 21 • June 4 • June 11 • June 18 • July 2 • July 16 • July 23 • August 27 • November 5

* * *

2012|

February 7 • March 6 • March 13 • April 6 • April 10 • May 1 • May 8 • June 5 • July 10 • August 28 • September 18 • November 6

* * *

2011|

January 25 • March 1 • March 8 • April 5 • April 12 • May 3 • June 7 • June 21 • July 12 • August 30 • November 8 • November 15 • November 22

* * *

2010|

January 12 • February 2 • February 23 • March 2 • March 9 • April 13 • May 4 • May 25 • June 8 • June 15 • June 22 • July 13 • August 24 • August 31 • September 21 • November 2

* * *

2009|

January 13 • February 24 • March 3 • March 10 • April 21 • May 5 • May 19 • June 2 • June 9 • June 16 • June 23 • June 30 • July 21 • August 4 • August 25 • August 28 • November 3 • November 17 • December 8 • December 15

* * *

2008|

February 5 • March 4 • April 8 • June 3 • June 24 • July 22 • August 26 • November 4

* * *

2007|

March 6 • May 7 • November 6

* * *

2006|

March 7 • April 11 • May 2 • June 6 • November 7

* * *

Political topics|

Advisory votes • Binding arbitration • Business taxes • City charters • Election and voting laws • Gambling • Gann overrides • Hotel taxes • Incorporations • Immigration • Jurisdictional boundaries • Labor • Marijuana • Marijuana taxes • Mottos • Municipal bonds • Parcel taxes • Pensions • Project-Labor Agreements • Recall • Red light cameras • Rent control • Salaries of local officials • Sales taxes • School bonds • Term limits • Utility user taxes • Vehicle registration taxes • Zoning and land use

* * *

v • e

State of California
Sacramento (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2022 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy