Fossil record

| This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

* * *

Fossil record could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

|

We're all Homo here
Evolution

Relevant Hominids

* Charles Darwin
* Alfred Russel Wallace
* Gregor Mendel
* Richard Dawkins
* Jerry Coyne

A Gradual Science

* Coelacanth
* Neutral theory
* Gaia hypothesis
* Evolution

Plain Monkey Business

* Young Earth Creationism
* Old Earth Creationism
* Intelligent Design
* Microevolution vs. Macroevolution

v \- t \- e

The fossil record is the set of all fossils \- and it just happens to chart the course of evolution through time. It is one of the most significant pieces of supporting evidence for the idea that evolution is a rational and real explanation for the origin of the diversity of species. In general, the term "fossil record" refers to all fossils that have been excavated, examined and characterized so far by thousands of hardworking scientists and paleontologists over the last few hundred years. The fossil record is used as evidence for many of things, including for common descent, for mass extinctions, for the Cambrian explosion and for the fact that the Earth is considerably older than 6000 years. Plus for flood geology.

Skulls of successive (or near-successive, depending on the source) human evolutionary ancestors

At the same time, the fossil record is yet another thing which shows that creationist ideas are untenable. Creationists like to claim that there are no transitional fossils (fossils that fill the "gaps" between one species and another) in the fossil record. This is probably because if  one was presented to them, they would point out that there are now two new gaps on either side of it for which no transitional forms exist. Either that, or they are convinced that the fossil record is a hoax. But to scientists working on real research, the fossil record is a vital piece of evidence to study.

This ludicrous creationist cartoon is not even wrong. Though the overt ableism is enough to make any decent person cringe.

Due to the relative rarity of fossil formation (with factors such as time, location and pure luck governing what we can find), and the natural destruction of rock that holds fossils, it is unlikely that the fossil record will ever be 100% complete and comprehensive. Creationists don't (or don't want to) understand this, and insist that the absence of a single fossil disproves evolution outright. Scientists and palaeontologists who do understand how fossilisation works note that we can derive a lot of information from what we do have rather than dwelling on the information that we don't have/haven't found yet.

## See also[edit]

* Out-of-place fossils

Our articles related to evolution

- Phylogeny - Evolution - Natural selection - Cladistics - Acceptance - EvoWiki - De-evolution - Theory of Evolution - Stephen Jay Gould - Signal detection theory - Microevolution - Eugenics - Dinosaur - Social Darwinism - Human - Niche - Uncommon Descent - Common descent: the incontrovertible evidence - Phylogenetics -