RationalWiki and its branding problems

The new atheist Sam Harris said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."(see also: Distrust of atheists)[1][2]

Various attempts have been made to rebrand the public's views on atheists and atheism, but they have been unsuccessful. See: Attempts to positively rebrand atheism

RationalWiki is a politically left-leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview. RationalWiki has a pro-atheism bias. For example, one of its articles is entitled FAQ for the Newly Deconverted.[3] RationalWiki has a small fraction of the web traffic it had before October 2019 (see: RationalWiki and web traffic).

The Innis Maggiore Ad Agency, which works with major corporations, says concerning rebranding/repositioning: "When a brand’s meaning is strongly established in the mind, it’s extremely difficult — if not impossible — to change. It is possible to refine, adjust and hone a brand’s meaning when necessary. But repositioning a brand with a wholesale change? Hardly a chance."[4]

Margaret Thatcher said: “Being powerful is like being a lady... If you have to tell people you are, you aren't.”[5] So perhaps the name RationalWiki was a poor website name if RationalWikians wanted to convey that its contributors and web content is rational. RationalWiki has been called irrational by so many people that it created an essay at its website entitled I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki which is highly linked to on its website.[6][7] RationalWiki, by its own admissions, has experienced various incidences of mental illness being displayed on its website (see: RationalWiki and mental illness).

RationalWiki contributor User: User:TornadoLTS wrote:

“  |  But to give a more complete picture, there is a concept in branding that "Everything counts". Everything that an organization does either creates and builds its brand or weakens and/or destroys its brand. If there are any incongruencies or inconsistencies, it is harmful to a brand. I will give an illustration. I was in communication with a RationalWiki contributor who was unhappy with the amount of dysfunction that was happening at RationalWiki at the time. He was complaining about User:Oxyaena, User: GrammarCommie and others. And he made the charge that there was a lot of mental illness among RationalWiki contributors. If his charge is true, that would be a brand incongruency/inconsistency for a website called RationalWiki.[8] |  ”

|
|

RationalWiki users have a higher incidence of mental illness than the general public which is common for the Western atheist and Western secular leftist population as a whole (see: Atheism and mental illness and Secular leftists and psychogenic illness).

The abstract for the journal article Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members published in the Journal of Religion and Health indicates: "On dimensions related to psychological well-being, atheists and agnostics tended to have worse outcomes than either those with religious affiliation or those with no religious preference."[9]

## Contents

* 1 Los Angeles Times reporting that RationalWikians vandalize Conservapedia
* 2 Google data indicating that RationalWiki has a branding problem and RationalWikian commentary on this issue
* 2.1 Additional analysis: Google data indicating that RationalWiki has a branding problem and RationalWikian commentary on this issue (with additional SimilarWeb data)
* 3 RationalWiki, mental illness and brand incongruity
* 3.1 RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021
* 3.2 RationalWiki Administrator and RationalWiki Media Foundation board member DuceMoosolini said the RationalWiki website attracted "all sorts of weird people"
* 3.3 RationalWikians and autism/Asperger's syndrome
* 4 RationalWiki, feminism, anti-feminist behavior by RationalWiki Moderator User: Spud and its web visitor interest in pornography
* 4.1 RationalWiki and anti-feminist language by RationalWiki Moderator User: Spud
* 4.2 RationalWiki and its web visitor interest in pornography
* 4.2.1 Trustworthiness of websites linking to RationalWiki
* 5 RationalWiki, its mission to address authoritarianism and authoritarian behavior by RationalWiki leadership
* 5.1 GrammarCommie
* 5.2 LeftyGreenMario
* 5.2.1 RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament being unsuitable for a moderator
* 5.2.2 LeftyGreenMario's influence on RationalWiki according to RationalWiki Admininstrator Ace McWicked
* 6 RationalWiki's pro-atheism content and the public's distrust of atheism
* 7 RationalWiki User: KarmaPolice on factors which harm RationalWiki's brand
* 8 Prognosis for RationalWiki repairing its brand damage
* 9 See also
* 10 References

## Los Angeles Times reporting that RationalWikians vandalize Conservapedia[edit]

According to an article published in the Los Angeles Times in 2007, RationalWiki members "by their own admission" vandalize Conservapedia. So early on, RationalWiki had a branding problem.[10]

## Google data indicating that RationalWiki has a branding problem and RationalWikian commentary on this issue[edit]

According to the leading SEO and web marketing website MOZ.com, the number of brand searches for a domain is significantly correlated with a website's Google referral traffic - even more so than a website's domain strength (Domain strength is the quality and quantity of inbound links to a website.).

As can be seen below, the number of brand searches for the term "RationalWiki" is on a downward trend.

Google Trends worldwide data for the keyword "RationalWiki". Click the graphic above to see a duplicate of the graph. And then click the graphic a second time to enlarge it.

Seer Interactive is a big data digital marketing firm with many Fortune 500 clients.

Seer Interactive points out "When branded traffic is down year-over-year or month-over-month but organic visibility has not fluctuatuated, this may indicate a decrease in either brand demand or brand awareness. By leveraging Google Trends, you can quickly understand if interest in your brand has changed." When Seer Interactive refers to "organic traffic" they are referring to a website's Google traffic going to its website.

Snark is mocking in a sarcastic way. There is a logical fallacy called the appeal to ridicule logical fallacy. From a branding perspective, RationalWiki readers may have the perception that there is an incongruence between the name RationalWiki and a website that is overreliant on mocking. And because RationalWiki covers a lot of medical science topics, readers may feel uncomfortable with snark because it involves humor and the public doesn't usually associate science with sarcastic humor.

The RationalWiki Moderator Bongolian wrote at RationalWiki: "Over time, RW has clearly become less snarky over time, particularly in 2017 when the Scientific Point of View became favored over the Snarky Point of View when there was any issue over SPOV." [11] Historically speaking, atheists have a reputation for having an overreliance on mockery in terms of their rhetoric (see: Atheism and mockery).

RationalWiki tripled its organic traffic from 2017 to late 2019 in a big way and then various things happened to cause a massive decrease in organic traffic in November 2019 and beyond (See: RationalWiki and Google referral traffic). Google Trends data from 2017 to November 2020 indicates that worldwide Google searches for the keyword "RationalWiki" bounced between a somewhat narrow range between 2017 to June 2020 (The range on a relative scale varied between 67 and 90) which presumably was due to websites with large amounts of web traffic mentioning RationalWiki periodically during that time (see graph to the upper right in this section). Starting in June 2020, worldwide Google searches for the keyword "RationalWiki" saw a significant decline.

The data does not support the notion that a change from a less Snarky point of view to a more Scientific Point of View made a big improvement in RationalWiki's brand awareness. RationalWiki's brand awareness stayed about the same from July 2014 to June 2020 even though its organic traffic tripled during some of this time period. And then, as noted above, something happened around June 2020 that caused RationalWiki's brand awareness to go significantly down.

According to the leading web marketing company SEMRush, RationalWiki has experienced a huge drop in Google referral traffic in the latter part of 2019 and as of January 12, 2023 it receives 142,700 monthly visits via Google referral traffic.

In addition, RationalWiki dropped from a 66 domain authority score on October 21, 2023 to a 44 domain authority score on February 22, 2023. Domains with low domain scores typically have less traffic, less authoritative websites linking to them and more lower quality websites linking to them.

Google uses over 200 factors to evaluate the quality and the relevance of a website to various topics.

### Additional analysis: Google data indicating that RationalWiki has a branding problem and RationalWikian commentary on this issue (with additional SimilarWeb data)[edit]

In June of 2022, SimilarWeb reported that RationalWiki received about 40% of its traffic from the United States.

Google trends data for the keyword "RationalWiki" for the United States. The country that has the biggest amount of traffic to RationalWiki is the United States according to SimilarWeb. According to SimilarWeb.com, RationalWiki receives approximately 40% of its traffic from the United States.

Google Trends worldwide data for the keyword "atheist".

As noted above, the RationalWiki Moderator Bongolian wrote at RationalWiki: "Over time, RW has clearly become less snarky over time, particularly in 2017 when the Scientific Point of View became favored over the Snarky Point of View when there was any issue over SPOV." [12]

As noted above, worldwide searches for RationalWiki did not go up post 2017 despite RationalWiki adopting a less snarky point of view (see graphic above). But as noted above, RationalWiki tripled its organic traffic from 2017 to late 2019 in a big way and then various things happened to cause a massive decrease in organic traffic in November 2019 and beyond (See: RationalWiki and Google referral traffic). In addition, starting in June of 2020, the Google search term "RationalWiki" started seeing a big drop.

Although RationalWiki is strictly not an atheist/agnostic website and it has some theist contributors, it is worth noting that worldwide Google searches for the term "atheist" began to see a steady and consistent decline from the period April 2015 to 2018 before largely leveling off again (see graphic above). So RationalWiki decision to use a less snarky point of view may have had a modest effect. Starting in June of 2020, the Google search term "RationalWiki" started seeing a big drop and so the use of a less snarky point of view seems to have had little to no effect on its brand awareness during this time (But RationalWiki's massive decrease in organic traffic beginning in November 2019 somewhat clouds this issue).

In June of 2022, SimilarWeb reported that RationalWiki received about 40% of its traffic from the United States. Given that most of the websites with a large amount of traffic and most of the news websites with a very large amount of traffic need to know about RationalWiki in order to mention RationalWiki (Most such websites are in the United States), RationalWiki's loss of an enormous amount of Google referral traffic makes it less likely that such websites will mention RationalWiki in the future. Also, trust in major news organization is very low in the United States at this time.[13] Furthermore, the atheist movement has died (see: Decline of the atheist movement).

## RationalWiki, mental illness and brand incongruity[edit]

RationalWiki users have a higher incidence of mental illness than the general public which is common for the Western atheist and Western secular leftist population as a whole (see: Atheism and mental illness and Secular leftists and psychogenic illness).

The abstract for the journal article Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members published in the Journal of Religion and Health indicates: "On dimensions related to psychological well-being, atheists and agnostics tended to have worse outcomes than either those with religious affiliation or those with no religious preference."[14]

### RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021[edit]

"Can't everyone just calm down. It's not like it's the end of the world... yet." - Unclescrooge (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[15]

### RationalWiki Administrator and RationalWiki Media Foundation board member DuceMoosolini said the RationalWiki website attracted "all sorts of weird people"[edit]

See also: Atheism and social outcasts

In 2020, at the RationalWiki Discord server, the RationalWiki Administrator and RationalWiki Media Foundation board member DuceMoosolini said the RationalWiki website attracts "all sorts of weird people".

In 2020, at the RationalWiki Discord server, the RationalWiki Administrator and RationalWiki Media Foundation board member DuceMoosolini said the RationalWiki website attracts "all sorts of weird people".

### RationalWikians and autism/Asperger's syndrome[edit]

Atheists have an above-average incidence of autism and Asperger's syndrome (see: Atheism and autism).

The atheist PZ Myers and his blog audience scored higher than average on a Asperger's syndrome test (see: Atheist PZ Myers' blog audience and their reported Asperger's quotient test results).

Atheists are known for having poor social skills (see: Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence). According to an international study done by William Bainbridge, atheism is frequent among people whose interpersonal social obligations are weak and is also linked to lower fertility rates in advanced industrial nations (See also: Atheism and fertility rates).[16] The RationalWikian user/editer base has a significant number of quarrelsome, socially challenged males as evidenced the archives of the dispute resolution areas of their website - specifically the archives for RationalWiki's "Chicken Coop" and the archives for RationalWiki's "All things in moderation".

Brain researchers have conducted a number of studies focusing on the differences between atheists and the religious. See: Atheism and the brain

## RationalWiki, feminism, anti-feminist behavior by RationalWiki Moderator User: Spud and its web visitor interest in pornography[edit]

See also: RationalWiki and its web visitor interest in pornography

### RationalWiki and anti-feminist language by RationalWiki Moderator User: Spud[edit]

RationalWiki is a pro-feminism website.[17]

Above is a screen capture of one of the instances of RationalWiki Moderator User: Spud using language that would be considered derogatory to women by some feminists.

### RationalWiki and its web visitor interest in pornography[edit]

See also: RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography

RationalWiki.org is a politically left leaning website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview.

The editors of the website RationalWiki try to portray the website as a thinking person's wiki where the editors carefully analyze various matters.

But SimilarWeb.com data shows a significant portion of RationalWiki's web audience is interested in "adult" material as can be seen by the "adult" audience interests in the above graphic.

Atheists have played a significant role in both the production and consumption of pornographic material (See: Atheism and pornography and Atheism and child pornography).

Many feminists contend that pornography exploits women.[18] RationalWiki is a pro-feminism website.[19]

#### Trustworthiness of websites linking to RationalWiki[edit]

According to the leading search engine optimization website Search Engine Land: "Citation Flow is a number of predicting how influential a URL might be based on how many sites link to it. Trust Flow is a number predicting how trustworthy a page is based on how trustworthy sites tend to link to trustworthy neighbors."[20]

As far as a website's domain, high authority and trustworthy websites commonly have their trustflow metric higher than their citation flow metric. As can been above, RationalWiki has the exact opposite. Perhaps its web visitors who visit adult websites link to RationalWiki from low quality websites that are untrusted.

## RationalWiki, its mission to address authoritarianism and authoritarian behavior by RationalWiki leadership[edit]

On the mainpage of its website, RationalWiki indicates a primary purpose of the website is to engage in "Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism".

See also: Atheism and leadership and Atheism and social skills

The godless have a reputation for having poor leadership (see: Atheism and leadership) and as can be seen below RationalWiki is no exception to this matter which helps explains its socially challenged atmosphere and impoverished state as well as it falling web traffic and falling influence. See also: Atheism and social skills

On July 14, 2022, during the election process for the RationalMedia Foundation board of directors, RationalWiki users admitted that RationalWikians were offering weak candidates so far.[21]

### GrammarCommie[edit]

GrammarCommie is known for his bullying.

Research on the dark triad of personality traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) indicate a correlation with bullying.[22] See also: Atheism and narcissism and Atheism and psychopathy

Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli by Santi di Tito.

See also: GrammarCommie

GrammarCommie (GC) is largely a former RationalWiki administrator. He retired and vowed to never come back a few times (He came back a few times. His last post was July 13, 2022).[23]

He formerly served on the RationalWiki Foundation board of directors until he had a mental health crisis which consisted of him threatening to cut himself and commit suicide in order to get his way at RationalWiki (See: Screenshot captures of RationalWiki posts related to GrammnarCommie). He is an atheist and leftist.

GrammarCommie has anger management issues which sometimes results in him angrily posting abusive posts in all caps laced with profanity (see also: Atheism and anger and Atheism and profanity).[24][25] The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: "GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure. During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights."[26] See also: Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence

GrammarCommie frequently bans people which contributes to RationalWiki being a wiki that has a low edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki. He also frequently reverts other editors. A wiki with a low edit to block ratio tends to be a closed-minded wiki that is dogmatic and intolerant (see also: Atheism and dogmatism and Atheism and intolerance).

He is also known for his bullying. Research on the dark triad of personality traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) indicate a correlation with bullying.[27] See also: Atheism and narcissism and Atheism and psychopathy

In June of 2022, GrammarCommie was banning and unbanning himself. Before banning himself initially, GrammarCommie said that RationalWiki was "half-dead" and filled with "twits".[28] Specifically, he wrote: "You know what, fine. Take your half dead site, where most of you twits obsess over one or two articles and et the rest of the site rot, where I can't even perform basic category maintenance without someone getting on my ass, which by the way is why i haven't touched mainspace in ages, where trolls are humored as long as there's the barest minimum level of plausible deniability, and shove it right up your f**king *ss."[29] In reply, the RationalWiki user 2friedeggs said: "This site is dying for a reason" and he indicated that GrammarCommie was chasing good faith editors away. On July 3, 2022, the RationalWiki Moderator LeftyGreenMario gave Grammarcommie an ultimatum. He could either unblock himself and "contribute to the community without taking swipes at other people" or he could stay blocked.[30] In response, GrammarCommie replied: "@LeftyGreenMario What, exactly, am I supposed to contribute? I try to deal with trolls and asshats, I get burned. I try to clean up categories, I get burned. So. What, exactly, am I supposed to contribute?".[31]

GrammarCommie often pontificates about politics and economics and sees himself as very knowledgeable about these areas despite describing himself as being lower middle class. On July 30, 2021, GrammarCommie wrote: "I asked for data, not random factoids. Just as we can't infer that every white person lives at the lower middle class level because I do...".[32] He is also known for correcting people's grammar and being intolerant of people's grammatical errors.[33]

GrammarCommie describes himself thusly, "Deeply cynical and borderline misanthropic. Very much not Utopian. Unconventional left-winger. If you want more info engage me in a conversation. I'm an asshole, but I'm honest."[34] GrammarCommmie is admin at RationalWiki, which is a wiki that intentionally lies about its web traffic statistics on its article about itself in that it greatly inflates its web traffic and global market share

### LeftyGreenMario[edit]

See also: LeftyGreenMario

LeftyGreenMario (LGM) is a RationalWiki moderator.

LeftyGreenMario is not sure if she has bad judgment. She feels as if she is a bad person due to her gossiping about other RationalWikians at the RationalWiki Discord server.

The above screenshot was taken from the RationalWiki Discord server.

LeftyGreenMario (LGM) is a lady RationalWiki (RW) moderator and administrator. She is also a RationalWiki Foundation trustee. RationalWiki.org is a politically left-leaning wiki website that skews towards atheism/agnosticism in terms of its worldview. LeftyGreenMario became a RationalWiki moderator in January of 2018.[35]

LeftyGreenMario is a feminist, self-described asexual, atheist, evolutionist, proponent of abortion, environmentalist and a video game enthusiast.[36] LeftyGreenMario is a student of Herbert Marcuse's partisan tolerance, and almost singlehandedly destroyed what little bit of balance and tolerance of diverse viewpoints existed in the Rationalwiki community since its founding in 2007. As a Trustee of the RationalMedia Foundation,[37] LeftyGreenMario has led the project down the road of leftist intolerance. Many longtime contributors abandoned the project after her rise as a central figure. See also: RationalWiki and web traffic and LeafyGreenMario and Google referral traffic

Google has a number of quality indicators by which is rates a website. According to SEMRush, RationalWiki had 1.49 million monthly referral visits from Google in January of 2018 (which is when LeafyGreenMario became a RationalWiki moderator). According to SEMRush, RationalWiki's peak Google referral traffic was 3.5 million visits per month in August 2019. In June of 2020, according to SEMRush, RationalWiki had 464,000 monthly referrals from Google. In January of 2022, according to SEMRUsh, RationalWiki had 185,661 monthly referrals from Google. RationalWiki has lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in August of 2019 (see: RationalWiki and web traffic).

LeftyGreenMario is not sure if she has bad judgment (see screenshot graphic to the right). She feels as if she is a bad person due to her gossiping about other RationalWikians at the RationalWiki Discord server.

She was threatened with impeachment by a former RationalWiki Moderator and current Administrator of RationalWiki, who goes by the username Ace McWicked, due to her involvement in the RationalWiki GossipGate scandal (She gossiped about Ace McWicked). She apologized to Ace McWicked to turn things around, to no effect (see screenshot graphic to the right).

#### RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament being unsuitable for a moderator[edit]

RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament.[38] According to RationalWiki policy, ill-behavior on the RationalWiki Discord Server is not a recallable offense. However, RationalWikians do ignore their policies and act arbitrarily. For example, a RationalWikian was permabanned from the RationalWiki website without a 2/3rds vote which by RationalWkiki's policies is required.[39]

#### LeftyGreenMario's influence on RationalWiki according to RationalWiki Admininstrator Ace McWicked[edit]

On May 23, 2020, a RationalWiki (RW) administrator who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked essentially admits that RationalWiki is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrator.

In the above quote, LGM is an acronym for the lady, RationalWiki administrator LeftyGreenMario. See: Atheism and groupthink

## RationalWiki's pro-atheism content and the public's distrust of atheism[edit]

As noted above, RationalWiki has a pro-atheism bias. For example, one of its articles is entitled FAQ for the Newly Deconverted.[40]

Concerning distrust of atheists, sociological research indicates that atheists are widely distrusted in both religious cultures and nonreligious cultures.[41][42][43][44] According to a study published in the International Journal for The Psychology of Religion: "anti-atheist prejudice is not confined either to dominantly religious countries or to religious individuals, but rather appears to be a robust judgment about atheists."[43] The study found that many atheists do not trust other atheists as well.[43]

## RationalWiki User: KarmaPolice on factors which harm RationalWiki's brand[edit]

On August 15, 2022, KarmaPolice wrote: "I have... come across RW articles which had lessened authority due to it being a stub, being too America-centric and/or being outdated. RW also lacks 'authority' in the plethora of articles which it perhaps could/should have but currently does not."[45]

## Prognosis for RationalWiki repairing its brand damage[edit]

The full-service marketing and branding agency Hanlon indicates that three of the keys for an organization to repair its brand is humility, acknowledging problems and asking for forgiveness.[46] Since atheists have a reputation for being very proud and unforgiving, the probability of RationalWiki repairing its brand is low (see: Atheism and arrogance and Atheism and forgiveness).

RationalWiki does permanently ban some of its users.

Atheists are known for being more unforgiving than Christians (see: Atheism and forgiveness). For example, the Amish do excommunicate/shun members, but if they are contrite, they do allow ex-Amish to return to the Amish community.

For more information, please see: The key differences between RationalWiki and the Amish

## See also[edit]

* Attempts to positively rebrand atheism
* Atheism and public relations
* The key differences between RationalWiki and the Amish

## References[edit]

1. ↑ Roberts, Jessica, et al. (June 19, 2007). "Interview with an atheist". News21. Retrieved on July 30, 2014.
2. ↑ NEWSWEEK Poll: 90% Believe in God, Newsweek 2007
3. ↑ 'FAQ for the Newly Deconverted, RationalWiki website]
4. ↑ Repositioning a Brand: JCPenney showed brand reinvention can stretch only so far by Dick Maggiore at the Innis Maggiore Ad Agency
5. ↑ Margaret Thatcher quotes
6. ↑ Essay:I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki
7. ↑ RationalWiki web pages linking to the RationalWiki essay I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki
8. ↑ Revision as of 15:51, 14 August 2022 (edit) (undo) TornadoLTS (talk | contribs)
9. ↑ Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members by Hayward RD, Krause N, Ironson G, Hill PC, Emmons R., Journal of Religion and Health, 2016 Jun;55(3):1024-1037. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0179-2.
10. ↑ [Simon, Stephanie (June 19, 2007). "A conservative's answer to Wikipedia". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on May 5, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2019.]
11. ↑ Revision as of 06:33, 14 August 2022 (edit) (undo) Bongolian (talk | contribs) (→‎Rationalwiki should tone down on the snark.)
12. ↑ Revision as of 06:33, 14 August 2022 (edit) (undo) Bongolian (talk | contribs) (→‎Rationalwiki should tone down on the snark.)
13. ↑ Trust in news collapses to historic low, Axios, 2022
14. ↑ Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members by Hayward RD, Krause N, Ironson G, Hill PC, Emmons R., Journal of Religion and Health, 2016 Jun;55(3):1024-1037. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0179-2.
15. ↑ RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation
16. ↑ Bainbridge, William (2005). "Atheism" (PDF). Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. 1 (Article 2): 1–26.
17. ↑ RationalWiki - Feminism
18. ↑ Feminist Perspectives on Sex Markets, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, October 6, 2020
19. ↑ RationalWiki - Feminism
20. ↑ Majestic SEO Announces New Link Metrics: Trust Flow & Citation Flow
21. ↑ RationalWiki users admit the election for its Board of Trustees is offering weak candidates so far, Examining Atheism blog, July 14, 2022
22. ↑ Chabrol H.; Van Leeuwen N.; Rodgers R.; Séjourné S. (2009). "Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency". Personality and Individual Differences. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.
23. ↑ GrammarCommie contributions
24. ↑ Revision as of 22:51, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)
25. ↑ Revision as of 22:55, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)
26. ↑ RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser
27. ↑ Chabrol H.; Van Leeuwen N.; Rodgers R.; Séjourné S. (2009). "Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency". Personality and Individual Differences. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.
28. ↑ Revision as of 03:49, 10 June 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)
29. ↑ Revision as of 03:49, 10 June 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)
30. ↑ LeftyGreenMario's ultimatum to GrammarCommie
31. ↑ LeftyGreenMario's ultimatum to GrammarCommie
32. ↑ RationalWiki Saloon Revision as of 04:33, 30 July 2021 (view source) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs) (→‎Critical Race Theory)
33. ↑ Grammar Commie - Urban dictionary
34. ↑ GrammarCommie user page at RationalWiki
35. ↑ LeftyGreenMario's post on her user page that she became a RationalWiki Moderator
36. ↑ LeftyGreenMario - RationalWiki
37. ↑ https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_nm/4330247
38. ↑ Latest revision as of 14:46, 5 January 2022 (view source) Hastur (talk | contribs)
39. ↑ Revision as of 21:46, 11 March 2021 (view source) Christopher (talk | contribs)
40. ↑ 'FAQ for the Newly Deconverted, RationalWiki website]
41. ↑ Study: Atheists distrusted as much as rapists
42. ↑ Atheists Widely Distrusted, Even Among Themselves, UK Study Finds, Christian Post, 2015
43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 43.2 Anti-atheist distrust ‘deeply and culturally ingrained’, study finds, The Independent, 2015
44. ↑ Edgell, Gerteis & Hartmann 2006
45. ↑ Revision as of 10:06, 15 August 2022 (edit) (undo) (thank) KarmaPolice (talk | contribs)
46. ↑ The Brand Rehab Playbook: How to Repair a Damaged Brand