Natomas Unified School District, California

Natomas Unified School District

Sacramento County, California
District details
Superintendent: Chris Evans
# of school board members: 5
Website: Link

Natomas Unified School District is a school district in California.

Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...

* Superintendent
* School board
* Elections
* Budget
* Teacher salaries
* Academic performance
* Student enrollment
* Demographics
* Contact information

## Contents

* 1 Superintendent
* 2 School board elections
* 2.1 Election dates
* 2.2 Public participation in board meetings
* 3 Budget
* 3.1 Revenue
* 3.2 Expenditures
* 3.3 Debt
* 4 Teacher salaries
* 5 Academic performance
* 5.1 Proficiency assessments
* 5.1.1 Mathematics
* 5.1.2 Reading/language arts
* 5.2 Graduation rates
* 6 Student enrollment
* 7 About the district
* 8 Contact information
* 9 See also
* 10 External links
* 11 Footnotes

## Superintendent[edit]

|  This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates.

|

Chris Evans is the superintendent of the Natomas Unified School District. Evans was appointed superintendent in June 2012. Evans' previous career experience includes working as a teacher, principal, and athletic director.[1]

## School board elections[edit]

The Natomas Unified School District school board consists of five members elected at largeAll registered voters can vote for seats on the ballot in an at-large election. This is the alternative to a "by district" election, in which only the registered voters of a particular geographic area may vote for a particular seat up for election. to four-year terms.[2]

Office

| Name | Date assumed office

|
|

Natomas Unified Board of Education | Jag Bains | January 1, 2019 | Natomas Unified Board of Education | Micah Grant | 2016 | Natomas Unified Board of Education | Ericka Harden | December 11, 2020 | Natomas Unified Board of Education | Susan Heredia | 2000 | Natomas Unified Board of Education | Lisa Kaplan |

|  This officeholder information was last updated on May 27, 2021. Please contact us with any updates. |

|
|

### Election dates[edit]

See also: Natomas Unified School District elections in 2014, 2016, 2018, & 2020

Members of the Natomas Unified School District school board are elected to four-year terms. Two or three seats are up for election on a staggered basis every even-numbered year in November.

A general election was scheduled for November 3, 2020.

### Public participation in board meetings[edit]

The Natomas Unified School District school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[3]

## Budget[edit]

From 1995 to 2013, the Natomas Unified School District had an average of $81,861,211 in revenue and $85,808,316 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $134,437,158 in outstanding debt. The district retired $13,068,579 of its debt and issued $17,977,000 in new debt each year on average.[4]

### Revenue[edit]

The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.

Revenue by Source

Fiscal
Year | Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total
Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue
Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years.

1995| $5,905,000| 36.77%| $9,391,000| 58.47%| $765,000| 4.76%| $16,061,000
1996| $9,846,000| 44.52%| $11,484,000| 51.92%| $788,000| 3.56%| $22,118,000
1997| $9,071,000| 37.79%| $14,168,000| 59.03%| $764,000| 3.18%| $24,003,000
1998| $14,760,000| 42.71%| $18,623,000| 53.89%| $1,173,000| 3.39%| $34,556,000
1999| $19,015,000| 32.96%| $37,068,000| 64.25%| $1,608,000| 2.79%| $57,691,000
2000| $23,009,000| 43.16%| $28,675,000| 53.78%| $1,633,000| 3.06%| $53,317,000
2001| $34,558,000| 44.08%| $42,136,000| 53.74%| $1,713,000| 2.18%| $78,407,000
2002| $37,017,000| 51.37%| $32,890,000| 45.64%| $2,153,000| 2.99%| $72,060,000
2003| $43,178,000| 44.12%| $52,023,000| 53.16%| $2,669,000| 2.73%| $97,870,000
2004| $38,798,000| 38.05%| $60,247,000| 59.09%| $2,913,000| 2.86%| $101,958,000
2005| $35,126,000| 38.71%| $51,988,000| 57.30%| $3,617,000| 3.99%| $90,731,000
2006| $44,592,000| 44.41%| $52,027,000| 51.82%| $3,786,000| 3.77%| $100,405,000
2007| $51,392,000| 46.07%| $56,190,000| 50.37%| $3,979,000| 3.57%| $111,561,000
2008| $50,291,000| 34.18%| $92,732,000| 63.02%| $4,128,000| 2.81%| $147,151,000
2009| $44,180,000| 37.45%| $64,643,000| 54.79%| $9,158,000| 7.76%| $117,981,000 | 2010| $40,848,000| 39.19%| $55,699,000| 53.44%| $7,676,000| 7.36%| $104,223,000

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2011| $33,965,000| 33.09%| $61,702,000| 60.12%| $6,969,000| 6.79%| $102,636,000
2012| $40,712,000| 36.83%| $61,441,000| 55.59%| $8,373,000| 7.58%| $110,526,000
2013| $38,023,000| 33.92%| $66,674,000| 59.47%| $7,411,000| 6.61%| $112,108,000
Avg.| $32,330,842| 39.97%| $45,779,000| 55.73%| $3,751,368| 4.30%| $81,861,211

### Expenditures[edit]

The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:

* Instruction: operation expenditures, state payments on behalf of the district for instruction and benefits, and retirement system transfers
* Support Services: support services, food services, and retirement system transfers for support service staff
* Capital Spending: capital outlay expenditures (i.e., construction, land or facilities purchases, and equipment purchases)
* Debt & Gov. Payments: payments to state and local governments and interest on school system debt
* Other: all other non-K-12 programs, except food services

Expenditures by Category

Fiscal
Year | Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget
Total
Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget

Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years.

1995| $9,515,000| 31.95%| $5,160,000| 17.33%| $13,865,000| 46.56%| $1,217,000| 4.09%| $24,000| 0.08%| $29,781,000
1996| $10,571,000| 40.96%| $6,015,000| 23.30%| $6,458,000| 25.02%| $2,671,000| 10.35%| $95,000| 0.37%| $25,810,000
1997| $12,393,000| 26.70%| $6,899,000| 14.86%| $24,315,000| 52.38%| $2,671,000| 5.75%| $138,000| 0.30%| $46,416,000
1998| $14,977,000| 40.28%| $9,538,000| 25.65%| $10,056,000| 27.04%| $2,507,000| 6.74%| $105,000| 0.28%| $37,183,000
1999| $16,302,000| 46.31%| $10,749,000| 30.53%| $5,605,000| 15.92%| $2,389,000| 6.79%| $158,000| 0.45%| $35,203,000
2000| $18,109,000| 26.57%| $12,326,000| 18.08%| $34,766,000| 51.01%| $2,832,000| 4.16%| $125,000| 0.18%| $68,158,000
2001| $24,760,000| 31.36%| $15,475,000| 19.60%| $35,756,000| 45.29%| $2,715,000| 3.44%| $247,000| 0.31%| $78,953,000
2002| $29,426,000| 41.30%| $17,151,000| 24.07%| $21,441,000| 30.09%| $2,855,000| 4.01%| $375,000| 0.53%| $71,248,000
2003| $32,374,000| 37.53%| $17,773,000| 20.60%| $31,920,000| 37.01%| $3,783,000| 4.39%| $407,000| 0.47%| $86,257,000
2004| $33,762,000| 45.59%| $19,514,000| 26.35%| $16,267,000| 21.97%| $4,192,000| 5.66%| $316,000| 0.43%| $74,051,000
2005| $40,126,000| 31.86%| $24,695,000| 19.61%| $52,845,000| 41.96%| $7,847,000| 6.23%| $414,000| 0.33%| $125,927,000
2006| $45,356,000| 44.95%| $27,199,000| 26.95%| $19,995,000| 19.81%| $7,824,000| 7.75%| $539,000| 0.53%| $100,913,000
2007| $51,197,000| 35.42%| $30,936,000| 21.40%| $55,281,000| 38.25%| $6,318,000| 4.37%| $799,000| 0.55%| $144,531,000
2008| $55,170,000| 32.84%| $36,003,000| 21.43%| $63,923,000| 38.05%| $11,727,000| 6.98%| $1,191,000| 0.71%| $168,014,000
2009| $59,696,000| 49.99%| $37,119,000| 31.08%| $9,114,000| 7.63%| $12,236,000| 10.25%| $1,257,000| 1.05%| $119,422,000  | 2010| $55,552,000| 52.28%| $33,662,000| 31.68%| $4,979,000| 4.69%| $11,223,000| 10.56%| $843,000| 0.79%| $106,259,000

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2011| $53,473,000| 56.13%| $30,537,000| 32.06%| $2,838,000| 2.98%| $7,728,000| 8.11%| $686,000| 0.72%| $95,262,000
2012| $53,822,000| 49.79%| $32,731,000| 30.28%| $12,312,000| 11.39%| $8,311,000| 7.69%| $929,000| 0.86%| $108,105,000
2013| $56,763,000| 52.14%| $36,184,000| 33.24%| $8,044,000| 7.39%| $6,977,000| 6.41%| $897,000| 0.82%| $108,865,000
Avg.| $35,439,158| 40.73%| $21,561,368| 24.64%| $22,620,000| 27.60%| $5,685,421| 6.51%| $502,368| 0.51%| $85,808,316

### Debt

The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.

Debt

Fiscal
Year | Retired | Issued | Outstanding | Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | 1995| $0| $28,845,000| $46,430,000

|
|
|

1996| $460,000| $0| $45,850,000
1997| $515,000| $9,500,000| $54,835,000
1998| $1,030,000| $0| $53,805,000
1999| $2,608,000| $0| $57,742,000
2000| $1,455,000| $0| $56,790,000
2001| $1,665,000| $8,900,000| $64,025,000
2002| $2,584,000| $13,170,000| $74,611,000
2003| $2,070,000| $15,295,000| $88,590,000
2004| $5,905,000| $0| $148,685,000
2005| $83,660,000| $98,115,000| $165,974,000
2006| $2,928,000| $0| $162,773,000
2007| $2,903,000| $61,067,000| $220,937,000
2008| $5,366,000| $55,576,000| $274,508,000
2009| $27,829,000| $21,453,000| $268,132,000 | 2010| $74,793,000| $0| $193,884,000

|
|
|

2011| $5,747,000| $7,614,000| $195,751,000
2012| $21,635,000| $20,050,000| $192,078,000
2013| $5,150,000| $1,978,000| $188,906,000
Avg.| $13,068,579| $17,977,000| $134,437,158

## Teacher salaries[edit]

The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.

Year  |  Minimum  |  Maximum

|
|

2021[5] |  $48,593  |  $101,741
2020[6] |  $47,645  |  $99,756

## Academic performance[edit]

### Proficiency assessments[edit]

Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[7]

#### Mathematics[edit]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[8]

School year  |  All (%)  |  Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)  |  Black (%)  |  Hispanic (%)  |  Native
American (%)  |  Two or More
Races (%)  |  White (%)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2018-2019 |  34 |  51  |  17  |  26  |  20-29  |  38  |  48
2017-2018 |  32 |  46  |  15  |  24  |  20-29  |  36  |  47
2016-2017 |  33 |  48  |  14  |  24  |  20-29  |  34  |  47
2015-2016 |  35 |  50  |  16  |  27  |  20-29  |  37  |  48
2014-2015 |  34 |  48  |  16  |  25  |  11-19  |  35  |  47
2013-2014 |  58 |  75-79  |  40-44  |  45-49  |  N/A  |  55-59  |  70-74
2012-2013 |  55 |  70  |  38  |  47  |  40-44  |  52  |  69
2011-2012 |  55 |  72  |  39  |  45  |  40-49  |  50  |  68
2010-2011 |  56 |  71  |  39  |  48  |  40-49  |  54  |  68

#### Reading/language arts[edit]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[8]

School year  |  All (%)  |  Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)  |  Black (%)  |  Hispanic (%)  |  Native
American (%)  |  Two or More
Races (%)  |  White (%)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2018-2019 |  47 |  62  |  28  |  41  |  50-59  |  50  |  59
2017-2018 |  44 |  58  |  27  |  37  |  40-49  |  48  |  57
2016-2017 |  43 |  55  |  24  |  35  |  30-39  |  46  |  57
2015-2016 |  43 |  56  |  24  |  36  |  20-29  |  46  |  59
2014-2015 |  43 |  55  |  25  |  33  |  20-29  |  45  |  59
2013-2014 |  58 |  65-69  |  40-44  |  50-54  |  N/A  |  55-59  |  75-79
2012-2013 |  58 |  67  |  44  |  50  |  50-54  |  61  |  75
2011-2012 |  58 |  69  |  43  |  49  |  30-39  |  60  |  74
2010-2011 |  57 |  69  |  43  |  48  |  30-39  |  59  |  72

### Graduation rates[edit]

The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[8][9]

School year  |  All (%)  |  Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)  |  Black (%)  |  Hispanic (%)  |  Native
American (%)  |  Two or More
Races (%)  |  White (%)

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

2017-2018 |  95 |  ≥95  |  ≥95  |  90-94  |  PS  |  ≥90  |  ≥95
2016-2017 |  90 |  90-94  |  85-89  |  90-94  |  PS  |  80-89  |  90-94
2015-2016 |  95 |  ≥95  |  90-94  |  ≥95  |  PS  |  ≥95  |  ≥95
2014-2015 |  N/A |  N/A  |  N/A  |  N/A  |  N/A  |  N/A  |  N/A
2013-2014 |  88 |  90-94  |  80-84  |  83  |  ≥50  |  ≥90  |  90-94
2012-2013 |  89 |  90-94  |  80-84  |  88  |  ≥50  |  70-79  |  ≥95
2011-2012 |  86 |  90-94  |  80-84  |  86  |  ≥50  |  ≥90  |  85-89
2010-2011 |  84 |  90-94  |  80-84  |  83  |  ≥50  |  ≥80  |  80-84

## Student enrollment[edit]

Year[10] |  Enrollment  |  Year-to-year change (%)

|
|

2018-2019  |  13,438  |  -9.7
2017-2018  |  14,880  |  1.8
2016-2017  |  14,620  |  2.3
2015-2016  |  14,287  |  4.9
2014-2015  |  13,616  |  3.5
2013-2014  |  13,152  |  5.7
2012-2013  |  12,442  |  1.0
2011-2012  |  12,322  |  -0.1
2010-2011  |  12,330  |  -0.2
2009-2010  |  12,354  |  1.6
2008-2009  |  12,162  |  9.5
2007-2008  |  11,108  |  2.8
2006-2007  |  10,808  |  3.9
2005-2006  |  10,398  |  6.7
2004-2005  |  9,743  |  12.8
2003-2004  |  8,636  |  12.8
2002-2003  |  7,653  |  10.1
2001-2002  |  6,953  |  15.0
2000-2001  |  6,048  |  11.9
1999-2000  |  5,406  |  1.9
1998-1999  |  5,305  |  6.5
1997-1998  |  4,979  |  22.2
1996-1997  |  4,073  |  15.0
1995-1996  |  3,541  |  14.8
1994-1995  |  3,085  |  14.8
1993-1994  |  2,687  |  \-

## About the district[edit]

File:Sacramento County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Sacramento Highlighted.svg

Natomas Unified School District is located in Sacramento County, California.

Natomas Unified School District is located in Sacramento County, California. It is classified as a large city school district by the National Center for Education Statistics. The district served 13,438 students during the 2018-2019 school year and comprised 19 schools.[11]

During the 2018-2019 school year, 60.5% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 13.1% were English language learners, and 13.3% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP)An IEP is a specific education plan that is tailored to the needs of a student with a disability. It describes how the student learns most effectively, formulates goals for the student and considers their ability in relation to general curriculum..[12]

Racial Demographics, 2018-2019

Race  |  Natomas Unified School District (%)  |  California K-12 students (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native  |  0.7  |  0.5
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander  |  21.5  |  11.7
Black  |  18.1  |  5.4
Hispanic  |  32.1  |  54.6
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander  |  1.8  |  0.5
Two or More Races  |  9.8  |  4.5
White  |  16.1  |  22.9

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

## Contact information[edit]

Natomas Unified School District
1901 Arena Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95834
Phone: 916-567-5400
Email: customerservice@natomasunified.org

## See also[edit]

California | School Board Elections | News and Analysis

|
|

* List of school districts in California
* Public education in California

* California school board elections, 2021

* Analysis of spending in America's largest school districts
* United States school shootings, 1990-present

## External links[edit]

* Search Google News for this topic
* Natomas Unified School District
* Natomas Teachers Association
* California Department of Education
* California School Boards Association

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ LinkedIn, "Chris Evans," accessed October 9, 2019
2. ↑ Natomas Unified School District, "Board of Trustees," accessed July 27, 2015
3. ↑ Natomas Unified School District, "Meeting conduct," accessed May 25, 2021
4. ↑ United States Census Bureau, "Public School System Finances: Historical Data," accessed December 1, 2015
5. ↑ Natomas Unified School District, "Certificated Salary Schedule - Effective July 1, 2021," accessed May 25, 2021
6. ↑ Natomas Unified School District, "Certificated Salary Schedule - Effective July 1, 2020," accessed May 25, 2021
7. ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "State Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-19 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 To protect student privacy, percentages were reported as ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five (5) or fewer students were included in a data set, the data was replaced by "PS."
9. ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "Four-Year Adjusted-Cohort Graduation Rates - School Year 2017-18 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
10. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "ElSi tableGenerator," accessed March 8, 2021
11. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Search for Public School Districts," accessed March 8, 2021
12. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey," accessed March 8, 2021

v • e

List of the largest school districts in California

ABC Unified • Alameda • Alhambra • Alum Rock • Alvord • Anaheim City • Anaheim Union • Antelope Valley • Antioch • Apple Valley • Arcadia • Azusa • Bakersfield • Baldwin Park • Bellflower • Berkeley • Bonita • Burbank • Cajon Valley • Calexico • Capistrano • Carlsbad • Castro Valley Unified • Central Unified • Ceres • Chaffey • Chico • Chino Valley • Chula Vista • Clovis • Coachella Valley • Colton • Compton • Conejo Valley • Corona-Norco • Covina-Valley • Cupertino • Desert Sands • Downey • East Side • El Monte City • El Monte Union • El Rancho • Elk Grove • Escondido • Etiwanda • Evergreen • Fairfield-Suisun • Folsom-Cordova • Fontana • Franklin-McKinley • Fremont Unified • Fremont Union High • Fresno • Fullerton • Fullerton Joint Union • Garden Grove • Gilroy • Glendale • Grossmont • Hacienda La Puente • Hayward • Hemet • Hesperia • Huntington Beach • Inglewood • Irvine • Jurupa • Kern • Kings Canyon • La Mesa-Spring Valley • Lake Elsinore • Lancaster • Las Virgenes • Livermore Valley • Lodi • Lompoc • Long Beach • Los Alamitos • Los Angeles • Los Banos • Lucia Mar • Lynwood • Madera • Manteca • Marysville • Menifee • Merced City • Merced Union • Milpitas • Modesto • Montebello • Monterey Peninsula • Moreno Valley • Morgan Hill • Mount Diablo • Murrieta Valley • Napa Valley • Natomas • New Haven • Newport-Mesa • Norwalk-La Mirada • Oak Grove • Oakland • Ocean View • Oceanside • Ontario-Montclair • Orange • Oxnard • Oxnard Union • Pajaro Valley • Palm Springs • Palmdale • Palo Alto • Palos Verdes Peninsula • Panama-Buena Vista • Paramount • Pasadena • Perris • Pittsburg • Placentia-Yorba Linda • Pleasanton • Pomona • Porterville • Poway • Redlands • Redwood • Rialto • Riverside • Rocklin • Roseville City • Roseville Joint Union • Rowland • Sacramento • Saddleback Valley • Salinas • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Dieguito • San Francisco • San Jacinto • San Jose • San Juan • San Lorenzo • San Marcos • San Mateo-Foster • San Ramon Valley • Sanger • Santa Ana • Santa Barbara • Santa Clara • Santa Maria-Bonita • Santa Monica-Malibu • Santa Rosa • Saugus • Sequoia • Simi Valley • South San Francisco • Stockton • Sweetwater • Temecula Valley • Torrance • Tracy • Tulare • Turlock • Tustin • Twin Rivers • Upland • Vacaville • Val Verde • Vallejo City • Ventura • Victor Elementary • Victor Valley • Visalia • Vista • Walnut Valley • West Contra Costa • West Covina • Western Placer • Westminster • Whittier • William S. Hart Union • Woodland • Yuba City • Yucaipa-Calimesa

v • e

State of California
Sacramento (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy