Political endorsement

Short description: Publicly declaring support for a candidate

A political endorsement is a public declaration of one's personal or group's support of a candidate for elected office. In a multiparty system, where one party considers that it does not have enough support to win power, just prior to the election, the official representative of that party may give an official endorsement for a party that they consider more likely to be a contender. In Australian electoral law, "electoral endorsement" is a specific term and a candidate can only be endorsed by a registered party. There are also presidential endorsements.

During a typical election notable endorsements generally come from other politicians and political officeholders (both from the country where the election is being held and as from foreign states) party officials, political operatives, activists and notable public figures (such as political pundits and celebrities), business leaders, organizations (such as activist groups and Labor Unions), Newspapers, websites, other media organizations, and other political parties.

Endorsements can generally be used to judge a candidate positions on electoral issues as it provided clues to what it issues it supports or opposes. For example a candidate that is endorsed by environmental groups likely suggests that the candidate supports pro-environmental legislation, whereas a candidate who is endorsed by conservative politicians and is not endorsed by liberal politicians likely suggests that the candidate holds conservative views and stances on issues.[1]

## By journalists

According to a 2002 study, editorial endorsements of candidates by newspapers[2] led voters to evaluate endorsed candidates more favorably than candidates who fail to secure an editorial endorsement.[3] An editorial political endorsement of national political races can result in the perception of reduced journalistic objectivity, while endorsement in local political races can be seen non-partisan.[4] Reduced political accountability from journalism is a risk to democracy.[5] Scientific credibility of scientific organizations can be reduced with editorial political endorsements.[6]

## References

1. ↑ "How to Judge a Candidate | League of Women Voters" (in en). 2020-09-29. https://www.lwv.org/blog/how-judge-candidate.
2. ↑ Ansolabehere, Stephen; Lessem, Rebecca; Snyder, Jr, James M. (October 2006). "The orientation of newspaper endorsements in U.S. elections, 1940–2002". Quarterly Journal of Political Science (Now Publishing Inc.) 1 (4): 393–404. doi:10.1561/100.00000009.
3. ↑ Kahn, Kim Fridkin; Kenney, Patrick J. (2002). "Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens' Views of Candidates" (in en). American Political Science Review 96 (2): 381–394. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000230. ISSN 1537-5943. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/slant-of-the-news-how-editorial-endorsements-influence-campaign-coverage-and-citizens-views-of-candidates/71FB7C8336B7B12EB239802C09A37F4D.
4. ↑ Perreault, Gregory; Kananovich, Volha; Hackett, Ella (27 March 2022). "Guarding the Firewall: How Political Journalists Distance Themselves From the Editorial Endorsement Process". Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (SAGE Publications) 100 (2): 354–372. doi:10.1177/10776990221084609. ISSN 1077-6990.
5. ↑ Waisbord, Silvio (2001–2002). "The Challenges of Investigative Journalism". U. Miami L. Rev. 56: 377. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/umialr56&div=21&id=&page=. Retrieved 7 August 2024.
6. ↑ Lupia, Arthur (20 March 2023). "Political endorsements can affect scientific credibility". Nature (Springer Science and Business Media LLC) 615 (7953): 590–591. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00799-3. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 36941377. Bibcode: 2023Natur.615..590L.

* v
* t
* e

Media and human factors

* Cognitive psychology
* Externality
* Evolutionary psychology
* Behavioral modernity
* Cognition
* Mismatch
* Media psychology
* Media studies
* Social psychology

Media practices|

* Betteridge's law of headlines
* Gatekeeping
* Infotainment
* Human-interest story
* Junk food news
* Least objectionable program
* Soft media
* Journalistic scandal
* Media bias
* Media manipulation
* Pink-slime journalism
* Political endorsement
* Propaganda
* Public relations
* Missing white woman syndrome
* News values
* Sensationalism
* Hot take
* Spiking
* Tabloid television
* Trial by media
* Yellow journalism

Attention|

* Attention economy
* Attention inequality
* Attention management
* Attention span
* Chumbox
* Clickbait
* Cognitive miser
* Low information voter
* Digital zombie
* Phubbing
* Doomscrolling
* Human multitasking
* Media multitasking
* Mobile phones and driving safety
* Smartphones and pedestrian safety
* Texting while driving
* Influence-for-hire
* Infodemic
* Information explosion
* Information overload
* Information pollution
* Information–action ratio
* Rage farming
* Screen time
* Binge-watching
* Television consumption
* Sticky content

Cognitive bias/
Conformity|

* Availability cascade
* Availability heuristic
* Bandwagon effect
* Confirmation bias
* Crowd psychology
* Mobbing
* Moral panic
* Mean world syndrome
* Negativity bias
* Peer pressure
* Social-desirability bias
* Social influence bias
* Spiral of silence

Digital divide/
Political polarization|

* Algorithmic radicalization
* Youth
* Algorithmic amplification
* Echo chamber
* Fake news website
* Post-truth politics
* United States
* Filter bubble
* Knowledge divide
* Knowledge gap hypothesis
* Political polarization in the United States
* Social media use in politics
* United States
* 2016 U.S. presidential election
* 2020 U.S. presidential election

Related topics|

* Computer rage
* Criticism of Facebook
* 2021 Facebook company files leak
* Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal
* Criticism of Netflix
* Cultural impact of TikTok
* Digital media use and mental health
* Effects of violence in mass media
* Fascination with death
* Griefer
* Mass shooting contagion
* Psychological effects of Internet use
* Sealioning
* Social aspects of television
* Social bot
* Social impact of YouTube
* Technophilia
* Neophile
* Technophobia
* Violence and video games

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political endorsement. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Political_endorsement&oldid=4004031"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template