History of modern period domes

Template:Dome architecture Domes built in the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries benefited from more efficient techniques for producing iron and steel as well as advances in structural analysis.

Metal-framed domes of the 19th century often imitated earlier masonry dome designs in a variety of styles, especially in church architecture, but were also used to create glass domes over shopping arcades and hothouses, domes over locomotive sheds and exhibition halls, and domes larger than any others in the world. The variety of domed buildings, such as parliaments and capitol buildings, gasometers, observatories, libraries, and churches, were enabled by the use of reinforced concrete ribs, lightweight papier-mâché, and triangulated framing.

In the 20th century, planetarium domes spurred the invention by Walther Bauersfeld of both thin shells of reinforced concrete and geodesic domes. The use of steel, computers, and finite element analysis enabled yet larger spans. Tension membrane structure became popular for domed sports stadiums, which also innovated with rigid retractable domed roofs.

## Contents

* 1 Nineteenth century
* 1.1 Developments
* 1.1.1 Materials
* 1.1.2 Structure
* 1.1.3 Style
* 1.2 Religious and royal buildings
* 1.3 Commercial buildings
* 1.4 Greenhouses and conservatories
* 1.5 Libraries
* 1.6 Governmental buildings
* 1.7 Industrial buildings
* 1.8 Tombs
* 2 Twentieth century
* 2.1 Developments
* 2.2 Guastavino tile
* 2.3 Reinforced concrete
* 2.4 Reticular and geodesic domes
* 2.5 Tension and membranes
* 2.6 Retractable domes and stadiums
* 3 Twenty-first century
* 4 References
* 5 Bibliography

## Nineteenth century

### Developments

#### Materials

New production techniques allowed for cast iron and wrought iron to be produced both in larger quantities and at relatively low prices during the Industrial Revolution.[1] Most iron domes were built with curved iron ribs arranged radially from the top of the dome to a ring at the base. The material of choice for domes changed over the course of the 19th century from cast iron to wrought iron to steel.[2] Excluding domes that simply imitated multi-shell masonry, the century's chief development of the simple domed form may be metal-framed domes such as the circular dome of Halle au Blé in Paris and the elliptical dome of the Royal Albert Hall in London.[3]

The practice of building rotating domes for housing large telescopes became popular in the 19th century, with early examples using papier-mâché to minimize weight.[4]

Beginning in the late 19th century, the Guastavino family, a father and son team who worked on the eastern seaboard of the United States, further developed the masonry dome. They perfected a traditional Spanish and Italian technique for light, center-less vaulting using layers of tiles in fast-setting cement set flat against the surface of the curve, rather than perpendicular to it. The father, Rafael Guastavino, innovated with the use of Portland cement as the mortar, rather than the traditional lime and gypsum mortars, which allowed mild steel bar to be used to counteract tension forces.[5]

Although domes made entirely from reinforced concrete were not built before 1900, the church of Saint-Jean-de-Montmartre was designed by Anatole de Baudot with a small brick shell dome with reinforced concrete ribs.[6] St. Ursula Parish Church (de) in Munich, Germany, was built between 1894 and 1897 with a dome of two lightweight concrete shells, using reinforcing rings only in the underlying octagonal tambour. The 11.2-meter-wide (37 ft) hemispherical inner dome is 15 cm thick with eight ribs on its outer surface increasing that thickness to 29 cm. The outer octagonal cloister vault is 11.8 meters wide and 16 cm thick. An artificial stone called "Schwemm-stein" (de) was used as a porous aggregate. Neither dome included reinforcement, although iron bars have been detected at irregular distances in the outer dome that may have been part of the formwork needed for the building process, and which may act as partial reinforcement.[7] Other concrete domes at this time included a music pavilion in Hoppegarten (1887–1888), the Monier-dome of the mausoleum of Emperor Frederick III in Potsdam (1889), and a dome above the foyer of the Brunner banking house in Brussels (1892–1895).[8]

#### Structure

Proportional rules for an arch's thickness to span ratio were developed during the 19th century, based on catenary shape changes in response to weight loads, and these were applied to the vertical forces in domes.[9] The first studies on domes' limit thickness were published in 1855 by Kobell.[10] Mathematical analysis of domes were published by Eytelwein (1808), Dietlein (de) (1823), Persy (1834), Kobell (1855), Scheffler (1857), and Michon (1857), but the methods were not used by architects and engineers.[11] Edmund Beckett Denison, who had published a proof on the subject in 1871, wrote in a Domes article in the Ninth Edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica that the thickness to span ratio was lower for a dome than it was for an arch due to the more distributed loads of a dome.[9] The first studies of collapse mechanisms for domes were published in 1877 by Beckett.[10] Ideas on linear elasticity were formalized in the 19th century.[12] The first graphical analysis of domes was published in 1879 by Wittmann, allowing the line of thrust to be determined, and it was used by other German authors. The 1878 graphical method by Henry Turner Eddy to calculate compressive and tensile hoop forces was applied to masonry domes of revolution in any form in 1881 by August Föppl and it was used in America beginning around 1900.[13]

The span of the ancient Pantheon dome, although matched during the Renaissance, remained the largest in the world until the middle of the 19th century.[14] The large domes of the 19th century included exhibition buildings and functional structures such as gasometers and locomotive sheds.[15]

Domes made of radial trusses were analyzed with a "plane frame" approach, rather than considering three dimensions, until an 1863 Berlin gasometer dome design by engineer Johann Wilhelm Schwedler that became known as the "Schwedler dome". He published the theory behind five such domes and a structural calculation technique in 1866. Schwedler's work on these axially symmetric shells was expanded by August Föppl in 1892 to apply to "other shell-type truss frameworks".[16] By the 1860s and 1870s, German and other European engineers began to treat iron domes as collections of short straight beams with hinged ends, resulting in light openwork structures. Other than in glasshouses, these structures were usually hidden behind ceilings.[17] Dome types that used lengths of rolled steel with riveted joints included "Schwedler domes", "Zimmermann domes", "lattice domes", and "Schlink domes".[16]

According to Irene Giustina, dome construction was one of the most challenging architectural problems until at least the end of the 19th century, due to a lack of knowledge about statics.[18] Rafael Guastavino's use of the recent development of graphic statics enabled him to design and build inexpensive funicular domes with minimal thickness and no scaffolding. The vaults were typically 3 inches thick and workers, standing on the completed portions, used simple templates, wires, and strings to align their work.[19]

#### Style

The historicism of the 19th century led to many domes being re-translations of the great domes of the past, rather than further stylistic developments, especially in sacred architecture.[20] The Neoclassical style popular at this time was challenged in the middle of the 19th century by a Gothic Revival in architecture, in what has been termed the "Battle of the Styles". This lasted from about 1840 to the beginning of the 20th century, with various styles within Classicism, such as Renaissance, Baroque, and Rococo revivals, also vying for popularity. The last three decades of this period included unusual combinations of these styles.[21]

### Religious and royal buildings

The Royal Stables at Brighton Pavilion were designed by William Porden and built from 1804 to 1808 in an Orientalist style for the Prince of Wales. The circular courtyard of the stable block, 26 metres (85 ft) in diameter, was domed with laminated timber and glass, evidently inspired by the similar dome over the Halle aux blés in Paris. The three-layer wooden ribs were supported horizontally by wooden purlins and iron chains. An oculus was covered by a lantern shaped as a coronet on the exterior. It was converted into a concert hall in 1934 and redecorated in an Art Deco style.[22]

The rotunda dome of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem was replaced from 1808 to 1810 after a fire and replaced again from 1868 to 1870.[23] The dome completed in 1870 was a Russian design made with wrought iron arches.[24]

Kazan Cathedral and Saint Isaac's Cathedral (background) in Russia.

Iron domes offered the lightness of timber construction along with incombustibility and higher strength, allowing for larger spans. Because domes themselves were relatively rare, the first examples made from iron date well after iron began to be used as a structural material.[2] Iron was used in place of wood where fire resistance was a priority. In Russia, which had large supplies of iron, some of the earliest examples of the material's architectural use can be found. Andrey Voronikhin built a large wrought iron dome over Kazan Cathedral in Saint Petersburg.[25] Built between 1806 and 1811, the 17.7-meter-wide (58 ft) outer dome of the cathedral was one of the earliest iron domes.[26] The iron outer dome covers two masonry inner domes and is made of 15 mm thick sheets set end to end.[27]

St. George's Church in Edinburgh was built from 1811 to 1814 by Robert Reid with a dome modeled after that of St. Paul's Cathedral.[28] An early example of an iron dome in Britain is the fanciful iron-framed dome over the central building of the Royal Pavilion in Brighton, begun in 1815 by John Nash, the personal architect of King George IV.[29] The dome was not one of the prominent onion domes but instead the dome-like structure of twelve cast iron ribs resting on cast iron columns over Henry Holland's earlier saloon. It was completed in 1818–1819.[27]

The neoclassical Baltimore Basilica, designed by Benjamin Henry Latrobe like the Roman Pantheon for Bishop John Carroll, was begun in 1806 and dedicated in 1821, although the porch and towers would not be completed until the 1870s. An influence on the interior design may have been the Church of St. Mary in East Lulworth, England, where Bishop Carroll had been consecrated.[30] The central dome is 22 metres (72 ft) in diameter and 16 metres (52 ft) above the nave floor. The onion domes over the two towers were built according to Latrobe's designs. The church was extended to the east by 10 metres (33 ft) in 1890.[31] Before initial construction of the church was completed, two other neoclassical domed churches would be built in Baltimore. The First Independent (Unitarian) Church by Maximilian Godefroy was begun in 1817 and covered the interior space with a 55-foot-wide (17 m) shallow coffered dome on pendentives with an oculus at the center. To improve acoustics, the interior was modified. The First Baptist Church by Robert Mills, also known as "Old Red Top Church", was a domed cylindrical rotunda with a porch block and portico. The dome had a shallow exterior profile and its oculus was covered by a low lantern, called a monitor. It was completed in 1818 but demolished in 1878.[32]

In 1828, the eastern crossing tower of Mainz Cathedral was rebuilt by Georg Moller with a wrought iron dome.[33] The dome was made of flat iron sections and reinforced with ties that passed through the interior of the dome. Such dome reinforcement was one of the two established techniques, the other being the use of a combination of horizontal rings and vertical ribs.[15] The span may have been about 27 meters.[34] It was later removed in favor of the current structure.[35]

The Altes Museum in Berlin, built in 1828 by Karl Schinkel, included a dome in its entrance hall inspired by the Roman Pantheon.[36]

Large neoclassical domes include the Rotunda of Mosta in Malta, was completed in 1840 with a dome 38 meters wide, and San Carlo al Corso in Milan, completed in 1847 with a dome 32 meters wide.[37]

In Galicia, the Basilian monastic pilgrimage church at Hoshiv (uk) was built from 1834 to 1842 as a large domed rotunda with four rectangular annexes in a cruciform plan, combining the central plan popular with classicist trends in Central Europe with the cross-domed plans held to be characteristic of eastern orthodox architecture.[38] Ruthenian Greek Catholic churches were built as tripartite churches with a dome over each of the three parts, such as the Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Przemyśl (pl) (1863–1864), or as cross-domed plans, such as St. Michael's Church at Kolomyia (pl) (1855).[39] Beginning around 1883, Vasyl Nahirnyi began to combine these traditional forms with the Neo-Byzantine style of Theophil Hansen, "borrowing the motifs of umbrella dome, portico, multi-mullioned windows, and arcaded friezes". He built more than 200 churches in Galicia, establishing a uniformity of Greek Catholic churches there to the extent of influencing the work of other architects. Examples include his Greek Catholic parish churches of Kuryłówka (1895) and Nowy Lubliniec (1898).[40] Seeking a more original design, the church building committee of Zniessinie (uk) commissioned Władysław Halicki (pl) to build its 1897 cross-domed parish church (uk).[41]

Saint Isaac's Cathedral, in Saint Petersburg, was built by 1842 with one of the largest domes in Europe. A cast iron dome nearly 26 meters wide, it had a technically advanced triple-shell design with iron trusses reminiscent of St. Paul's Cathedral in London.[42] The design for the cathedral was begun after the defeat of Napoleon in 1815 and given to a French architect, but construction was delayed. Although the dome was originally designed to be masonry, cast iron was used instead.[6]

Also reminiscent of St. Paul's dome and that of the Panthéon in Paris, both of which the original designer had visited, the dome of St. Nicholas' Church in Potsdam was added to the building from 1843 to 1849.[43] A dome was included as a possibility in the original late Neoclassical design of 1830, but as a wooden construction. Iron was used instead by the later architects.[44]

Other examples of framed iron domes include those of a synagogue in Berlin, by Schwedler in 1863, and the Bode Museum by Muller-Breslau in 1907.[45]

The wrought-iron dome of the Royal Albert Hall in London was built from 1867 to 1871 over an elliptical plan by the architect Henry Young Darracott Scott and structural design by Rowland Mason Ordish. It uses a set of curved trusses, like those of the earlier New Street Station in Birmingham, interrupted in the middle by a drum. The elliptical dome's span is 66.9 meters by 56.5 meters.[46]

The wrought-iron dome of the church of Saint-Augustin in Paris dates from 1870 and spans 25.2 meters. A wrought-iron dome was also built over Jerusalem's Holy Sepulchre in 1870, spanning 23 meters.[47]

The dome over the Basilica of San Gaudenzio (begun in 1577) in Novara, Italy, was built between 1844 and 1880. Revisions by the architect during construction transformed what was initially going to be a drum, hemispherical dome, and lantern 42.22 meters tall into a structure with two superimposed drums, an ogival dome, and a thirty meter tall spire reaching 117.5 meters.[48] The architect, Alessandro Antonelli, who also built the Mole Antonelliana in Turin, Italy, combined Neoclassical forms with the vertical emphasis of the Gothic style.[49] It has an internal diameter of 14 meters and an outer diameter of 22 meters. Although the two-shell dome cross section has arches very similar to a catenary and the thrust line is contained within the dome's masonry, the light and complex construction has had many stability problems.[50]

The 1881 Dutch rebuilding of the Baiturrahman Grand Mosque, destroyed during the Aceh War, introduced the Indian style dome in place of the previous traditional Indonesian tumpanf roof.[51]

A large dome was built in 1881–1882 over the circular courtyard of the Devonshire Royal Hospital in England with a diameter of 48 metres (156 ft).[52] It used radial trussed ribs with no diagonal ties.[45]

The dome of Pavia Cathedral, a building started in 1488, was completed with a large octagonal dome joined to the basilica plan of the church.[53]

### Commercial buildings

Although iron production in France lagged behind Britain, the government was eager to foster the development of its domestic iron industry. In 1808, the government of Napoleon approved a plan to replace the burnt down wooden dome of the Halle au Blé granary in Paris with a dome of iron and glass, the "earliest example of metal with glass in a dome". The dome was 37 meters in diameter and used 51 cast iron ribs to converge on a wrought iron compression ring 11 meters wide containing a glass and wrought iron skylight. The outer surface of the dome was covered with copper, with additional windows cut near the dome's base to admit more light during an 1838 modification.[54] Cast-iron domes were particularly popular in France.[55]

In the United States, an 1815 commission to build the Baltimore Exchange and Custom House was awarded to Benjamin Henry Latrobe and Maximilian Godefroy for their design featuring a prominent central dome. The dome design was altered during construction to raise its height to 35 metres (115 ft) by adding a tall drum and work was completed in 1822. Signals from an observatory on Federal Hill were received at an observation post in the dome, providing early notice of arriving merchant vessels. The building was demolished in 1901–2.[56]

The Coal Exchange in London, by James Bunstone Bunning from 1847 to 1849, included a dome 18 meters wide made from 32 iron ribs cast as single pieces. It was demolished in the early 1960s.[57]

Large temporary domes were built in 1862 for London's International Exhibition Building, spanning 48.8 meters.[47] The Leeds Corn Exchange, built in 1862 by Cuthbert Brodrick, features an elliptical plan dome 38.9 meters by 26.7 meters with wrought iron ribs along the long axis that radiate from the ends and others spanning the short axis that run parallel to each other, forming a grid pattern.[46]

The Galleria Umberto I in Naples.

Elaborate covered shopping arcades, such as the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II in Milan and the Galleria Umberto I in Naples, included large glazed domes at their cross intersections.[58] [59] The dome of the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II (1863–1867) rises to 44 metres (145 ft) above the ground and has the same span as the dome of St. Peter's Basilica, with sixteen iron ribs over an octagonal space at the intersection of two covered streets. It is named after the first king of a united Italy.[59]

The span of the metal-framed Galerie des machines at the Paris Exposition of 1889 was 111 meters.[60]

The central market hall in Leipzig was built by 1891 with the first application of the "lattice dome" roof system developed by August Föppl from 1883. The dome covered an irregular pentagonal plan and was about 20 meters wide and 6.8 meters high.[16]

Vladimir Shukhov was an early pioneer of what would later be called gridshell structures and in 1897 he employed them in domed exhibit pavilions at the All-Russia Industrial and Art Exhibition.[61]

The dome of Sydney's Queen Victoria Building uses radial ribs of steel along with redundant diagonal bracing to span 20 meters. It was claimed to be the largest dome in the Southern Hemisphere when completed in 1898.[45]

### Greenhouses and conservatories

Iron and glass glasshouses with curved roofs were popular for a few decades beginning shortly before 1820 to maximize orthogonality to the sun's rays, although only a few have domes. The conservatory at Syon Park was one of the earliest and included a 10.8-meter-span (35 ft) iron and glass dome by Charles Fowler built between 1820 and 1827. The glass panes are set in panels joined by copper or brass ribs between the 23 main cast iron ribs. Another example was the conservatory at Bretton Hall in Yorkshire, completed in 1827 but demolished in 1832 upon the death of the owner. It had a 16-meter-wide (52 ft) central dome of thin wrought iron ribs and narrow glass panes on a cast iron ring and iron columns. The glass acted as lateral support for the iron ribs.[62]

The Antheum at Brighton would have had the largest span dome in the world in 1833 at 50 meters but the circular cast-iron dome collapsed when the scaffolding was removed.[63] It had been built for horticulturalist Henry Phillips.[64]

Unique glass domes springing straight from ground level were used for hothouses and winter gardens, such as the Palm house at Kew (1844-48) and the Laeken winter garden near Brussels (1875–1876).[65] The Laeken dome spans the central 40 meters of the circular building, resting on a ring of columns. The Kibble Palace of 1865 was re-erected in 1873 in an enlarged form with a 16-meter-wide (52 ft) central dome on columns. The Palm House at Sefton Park in Liverpool has an octagonal central dome, also 16 meters wide and on columns, completed in 1896.[66]

### Libraries

A four-layer timbrel dome was built at the public library of Palermo in 1822 by Alessandro Emmanuele Marvuglia, whose father, Giuseppe Venanzio Marvuglia, had also used the technique.[67]

The domed rotunda building of the University of Virginia was designed by Thomas Jefferson and completed in 1836.[36]

The British Museum Library constructed a new reading room in the courtyard of its museum building between 1854 and 1857. The round room, about 42.6 meters in diameter and inspired by the Pantheon, was surmounted by a dome with a ring of windows at the base and an oculus at the top. Hidden iron framing supported a suspended ceiling made of papier-mâché.[68]

For the reading room of Paris's Bibliothèque Impériale, Henri Labrouste proposed in 1858 an iron-supported domed ceiling with a single central source of light similar to the British reading room, but changed the design due to concerns about insufficient light for readers. His completed 1869 design was a grid of nine domes, each with an oculus, supported by 16 thin cast iron columns, four of which were free-standing under the central dome.[69] The domes themselves, supported on iron arches, were covered in white ceramic panels nine millimeters thick.[70]

Inspired by the prestigious British Museum reading room, the first iron dome in Canada was built in the early 1870s over the reading room of the Library of Parliament building in Ottawa. Unlike the British Museum room, the library, which opened in 1876, uses the Gothic style.[71]

The dome of the Thomas Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress, also inspired by the reading room dome at the British Museum, was built between 1889 and 1897 in a classical style. It is 30 metres (100 ft) wide and rises 59 metres (195 ft) above the floor on eight piers. The dome has a relatively low external profile to avoid overshadowing the nearby United States Capitol dome.[72]

The Boston Public Library (1887–1898) includes dome vaulting by Rafael Guastavino.[73]

### Governmental buildings

The New Hampshire State House, built from 1816 to 1819, featured a dome crowned by a gilded eagle. When the dome was replaced after an 1864 project to double the size of the building, the eagle was transferred to the new dome.[74]

The design for the United States' national capitol building approved by George Washington included a dome modeled on the Pantheon, with a low exterior elevation. Subsequent design revisions resulted in a double dome, with a raised external profile on an octagonal drum, and construction did not begin until 1822. The interior dome was built of stone and brick except for the upper third, which was made of wood. The exterior dome was wooden and covered with copper sheeting.[75] The dome and building were completed by Charles Bulfinch in 1829.[76]

Most of the 50 state capitol buildings or statehouses with domes in the United States cover a central rotunda, or hall of the people, due to the use of a bicameral legislature. The Pennsylvania capitol building designed by Stephen Hills in Harrisburg was the earliest to combine all the elements that would subsequently become characteristic of state capitol buildings: dome, rotunda, portico, and two legislative chambers. Like the design of the national capitol, the design was chosen through a formal competition.[77] Early domed state capitol buildings include those of North Carolina (as remodeled by William Nichols), Alabama (in Tuscaloosa), Mississippi, Maine (1832), Kentucky, Connecticut (in New Haven), Indiana, North Carolina (as rebuilt), Missouri (very similar to Hills' Harrisburg design), Minnesota (later rebuilt), Texas, and Vermont (1832).[78]

The United States Capitol The Hungarian Parliament Building

The current dome over the United States Capitol building, although painted white and crowning a masonry building, is made of cast iron. The dome was built between 1855 and 1866, replacing a lower wooden dome with copper roofing from 1824.[79] It has a 30-meter diameter.[55] It was completed just two years after the Old St. Louis County Courthouse, which has the first cast iron dome built in the United States.[80] The initial design of the capitol dome was influenced by a number of European church domes, particularly St. Paul's in London, St. Peter's in Rome, the Panthéon in Paris, Les Invalides in Paris, and St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg.[81] The architect, Thomas U. Walter, designed a double dome interior based on that of the Panthéon in Paris.[79]

Dome construction for state capitol buildings and county courthouses in the United States flourished in the period between the American Civil War and World War I.[82] Most capitols built between 1864 and 1893 were landmarks for their cities and had gilded domes.[83] Examples from the Gilded Age include those of California, Kansas, Connecticut, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Wyoming, Michigan, Texas, and Georgia.[84] Many American state capitol building domes were built in the late 19th or early 20th century in the American Renaissance style and cover rotundas open to the public as commemorative spaces. Examples include the Indiana State House, Texas State Capitol, and the Wisconsin State Capitol.[85] American Renaissance capitols also include those of Rhode Island and Minnesota.[84]

The Reichstag Palace, built between 1883 and 1893 to house the Parliament of the new German Empire, included a dome made of iron and glass as part of its unusual mixture of Renaissance and Baroque components. Controversially, the 74-meter-tall (243 ft) dome stood seven meters taller than the dome of the Imperial Palace in the city, drawing criticism from Kaiser Wilhelm II.[86] Hermann Zimmermann assisted the architect Paul Wallot in 1889, inventing the spatial framework for the dome over the plenary chamber. It is known as the "Zimmermann dome".[16]

The Hungarian Parliament Building was built in the Gothic style, although most of the 1882 design competition entries used Neo-Renaissance, and it includes a domed central hall. The large, ribbed, egg-shaped dome topped with a spire was influenced by the dome of the Maria vom Siege church in Vienna.[87] It has a sixteen sided outer shell with an iron skeleton that rises 96 meters high, and an inner shell star vault supported on sixteen stone pillars. The Dome Hall is used to display the coronation crown of Hungary and statuary of monarchs and statesmen. The dome was structurally complete by the end of 1895.[88]

### Industrial buildings

The "first fully triangulated framed dome" was built in Berlin in 1863 by Johann Wilhelm Schwedler in a gasometer for the Imperial Continental Gas Association and, by the start of the 20th century, similarly triangulated frame domes had become fairly common.[89][61] Schwedler built three wrought-iron domes over gasholders in Berlin between 1876 and 1882 with spans of 54.9 meters, one of which survives. Six similar Schwedler-type domes were used over gasholders in Leipzig beginning in 1885 and in Vienna using steel, in the 1890s. Rather than using traditional iron ribs, the domes consist of a thinner arrangement of short straight iron bars connected with pin joints in a lattice shell, with cross-bracing provided by light iron rods.[90]

### Tombs

The dome of Grant's Tomb in New York City was built by Rafael Guastavino in 1890.[73][91]

## Twentieth century

### Developments

Graphical equilibrium analysis was used in America at the beginning of the 20th century to check the designs of domed structures, such as St. Paul's Chapel at Columbia University and the vaults of Spanish architect Guastavino.[13]

American state capitol domes built in the twentieth century include those of Arizona, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Idaho, Kentucky, Utah, Washington, Missouri, and West Virginia. The West Virginia capitol building has been called the last American Renaissance capitol.[92]

Early Modernist architecture, characterized by "geometrization of architectural detail", includes the domed Greek Catholic parish churches of Čemerné (1905–1907) and Jakubany (1911) in Slovakia.[93] The monumental domes of the Greek Catholic Basilian complex in Zhovkva (pl) (1901–1906), Transfiguration Church of Jarosław (pl) in Jarosław, Poland, (1902–1907), and the Church of St. Michael the Archangel (pl) in Surochów, Poland, (1912–1914) also have simplified geometry that attempt to blend traditional and modern styles, an effort interrupted by World War I and the breakup of the Habsburg monarchy.[94]

Wooden domes in thin-wall shells on ribs were made until the 1930s.[95] After World War II, steel and wooden laminate structural members made with waterproof resorcinol glues were used to create domes with grid-patterned wooden support structures, such as the 100-meter-diameter (330 ft) Skydome in Flagstaff, Arizona.[96] Glued laminated wooden structures were also used in 1983 to create the 160-meter (520 ft) Tacoma Dome, in 1990 to create the 160-meter (520 ft) Superior Dome, and in 1997 to create the 178-meter (584 ft) Nipro Hachiko Dome.[97]

Stand-alone dome structures were used to house public utility facilities in the 20th century.[98] The "Fitzpatrick dome", designed by John Fitzpatrick as an inexpensive structure to store winter road service sand and salt, has been used in countries around the world.[99][100] The first was built in 1968.[100] The domes have twenty sides and are normally 30 metres (100 ft) in diameter and a little more than 15 metres (50 ft) tall. The conical shape is meant to conform to the 45 degree slope of a pile of wet sand. They are built on concrete footings and covered with asphalt shingles.[101]

In the second half of the twentieth century, study of domes increased with the application of limit analysis and elastic analysis to models.[102] Beginning in 1967, Professor Jacques Heyman (de) applied limit analysis to the traditional technique of analyzing domes along the arches created by cutting the structure with meridian planes. He published studies analyzing dome collapse and cracking patterns.[10] Limit analysis, which models domes in a simplified manner as a kinematic chain of rigid blocks, was often used to study the collapse of masonry domes under various conditions of load, shape, and structural features. The analysis assumed "infinite compressive strength, infinite sliding strength and tensile strength equal to zero" for masonry domes.[102] Elastic analysis uses more refined models to perform three-dimensional membrane analysis of the distribution of stresses in domes with various shapes, loads, and boundary conditions. It models masonry as composed of either isotropic or orthotropic materials and takes block arrangement and mortar joints into account.[103]

### Guastavino tile

The Guastavino family, a father and son team who worked on the eastern seaboard of the United States, built vaults using layers of tiles in hundreds of buildings in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including the domes of the Basilica of St. Lawrence in Asheville, North Carolina, and St. Francis de Sales Roman Catholic Church in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[104] The dome over the crossing of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City was built by the son in 1909. A part-spherical dome, it measures 30 meters in diameter from the top of its merging pendentives, where steel rods embedded in concrete act as a restraining ring. With an average thickness 1/250th of its span, and steel rods also embedded within the pendentives, the dome "looked forward to modern shell construction in reinforced concrete."[5]

### Reinforced concrete

Domes built with steel and concrete were able to achieve very large spans.[55] The 1911 dome of the Melbourne Public Library reading room, presumably inspired by the British Museum, had a diameter of 31.5 meters and was briefly the widest reinforced concrete dome in the world until the completion of the Centennial Hall.[6] The Centennial Hall was built with reinforced concrete in Breslau, Germany (today Poland), from 1911-13 to commemorate the 100-year anniversary of the uprising against Napoleon. With a 213-foot-wide (65 m) central dome surrounded by stepped rings of vertical windows, it was the largest building of its kind in the world.[105] Other examples of ribbed domes made entirely of reinforced concrete include the Methodist Hall in Westminster, London, the Augsburg Synagogue, and the Orpheum Theater in Bochum.[6] The 1928 Leipzig Market Hall by Deschinger and Ritter featured two 82-meter-wide (269 ft) domes.[55]

Geodesic dome under construction in Jena.

The thin domical shell was further developed with the construction of two domes in Jena, Germany in the early 1920s. To build a rigid planetarium dome, Walther Bauersfeld constructed a triangulated frame of light steel bars and mesh with a domed formwork suspended below it. By spraying a thin layer of concrete onto both the formwork and the frame, he created a 16-meter-wide (52 ft) dome that was just 30 millimeters thick. The second dome was still thinner at 40 meters wide and 60 millimeters thick.[106] These are generally taken to be the first modern architectural thin shells.[107] These are also considered the first geodesic domes.[108] Beginning with one for the Deutsches Museum in Munich, 15 domed projection planetariums using concrete shells up to 30 meters wide had been built in Europe by 1930, and that year the Adler Planetarium in Chicago became the first planetarium to open in the Western Hemisphere.[109] Planetarium domes required a hemispherical surface for their projections, but most 20th century shell domes were shallow to reduce the material costs, simplify construction, and reduce the volume of air needing to be heated.[110]

In India, the Viceroy's House in New Delhi was designed in 1912–1913 by Edwin Lutyens with a dome.[111]

Although an equation for the bending theory of a thick spherical shell had been published in 1912, based on general equations from 1888, it was too complex for practical design work. A simplified and more approximate theory for domes was published in 1926 in Berlin. The theory was tested using sheet metal models with the conclusion that the membrane stresses in domes are small with little reinforcement required, especially at the top, where openings could be cut for light. Only the concentrated stresses at point supports required heavy reinforcement.[110] Early examples used a relatively thick bordering girder to stabilize exposed edges. Alternative stabilization techniques include adding a bend at these edges to stiffen them or increasing the thickness of the shell itself at the edges and near the supports.[112] In 1933-34, Spanish engineer-architect Eduardo Torroja, with Manuel Sanchez, designed the Market Hall in Algeciras, Spain, with a thin shell concrete dome. The shallow dome is 48 meters wide, 9 centimeters thick, and supported at points around its perimeter.[113] The indoor stadium for the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin used an oval dome of concrete shell 35 meters wide and 45 meters long.[114]

The use of metal structures in Italy was reduced in the first half of the 20th century by autarchy and the demands of the world wars.[115] Steel became broadly used in building construction in the 1930s.[116] A shortage of steel following World War II and the demonstrated vulnerability of exposed steel to damage from intense fires during the war may have contributed to the popularity of concrete architectural shells beginning in the late 1940s. In the 1960s, improvements in welding and bolting techniques and higher labor costs made steel frames more economical.[110]

In 1940, California architect Wallace Neff built a 30-metre (98 ft) dome using an inflated balloon of sailcloth as formwork. The balloon was made airtight by wetting, inflated, then supported steel reinforcement as concrete was sprayed onto it in layers. This technique was used to build "bubble houses" in Florida.[117]

After World War II, reinforced concrete was used in dome reconstruction in Palermo, Sicily, because it was quick, strong, economical, and readily available.[118] Examples include Church of the Gesù, Sant'Ignazio all'Olivella, and Santissimo Salvatore.[119]

The Kresge Auditorium in Massachusetts.

Popularized by a 1955 article on the work of Félix Candela in Mexico, architectural shells had their heyday in the 1950s and 1960s, peaking in popularity shortly before the widespread adoption of computers and the finite element method of structural analysis. Notable examples of domes include the Kresge Auditorium at MIT, which has a spherical shell 49 meters wide and 89 millimeters thick, and the Palazzetto dello Sport, with a 59-meter-wide (194 ft) dome designed by Pier Luigi Nervi.[120]

Built from 1955 to 1957, the prestressed concrete dome of the main exhibition hall of the Belgrade Fair has a span of 106 meters. It was designed by Branko Žeželj, using a pre-stressing system developed by him, and was the largest dome in the world until 1965. It remains the largest dome in Europe.[121]

In the 1960s, Italian architect Dante Bini developed an inflatable formwork system using a nylon-reinforced neoprene spherical balloon. First, a concrete floor slab and ring beam was poured. The ring beam included voids for air inlets and outlets and an inflatable tube that held the balloon membrane in place. The balloon was laid out uninflated over the floor slab and secured at the ring beam, reinforcement bars spaced with springs were laid on top, the concrete was applied, an outer membrane of PVC was laid over the concrete, then the balloon was inflated and lifted the material into the dome shape. After inflation, the concrete was vibrated using rolling carts attached to cables. After drying, the balloon could be removed and openings for door or windows could be cut out of the dome.[117][122] This "Binishell" system was used to build over 1,500 elliptical-section domes in countries around the world between 1970 and 1990, with diameters between 12 and 36 meters. Examples include the Edinburgh Sports Dome in Malvern (1977) and a project at Sydney's Ashbury School.[122]

The dome of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem experienced an earthquake in 1927, a fire in 1934, and a fire in 1949, which partially destroyed its lead roof.[123] In 1977 it was decided to renovate the dome to better resist earthquakes and fire. A British team of contractors used steel connectors to attach a 115 millimeter thick reinforced concrete dome shell to the outside of the 1870 wrought iron arches. They reduced the dome's total weight by 100 tons, so that either the shell or the arches could each support the total weight of the dome independently of the other. No flammable materials were used. The exterior was covered in traditional hand-finished lead sheeting. The interior was covered with a 25 millimeter thick layer of plaster attached to the wrought iron arches with a metal mesh.[124]

### Reticular and geodesic domes

The West Baden Springs Hotel in Indiana was built in 1903 with the largest span dome in the world at 61 metres (200 ft). Its metal and glass skin was supported by steel trusses resting on metal rollers to allow for expansion and contraction from temperature changes. It was surpassed in span by the Centennial Hall of Max Berg.[125]

Structurally, geodesic domes are considered shells when the loads are borne by the surface polygons, as in the Kaiser Dome, but are considered space grid structures when the loads are borne by point-to-point members.[126] A geodesic dome made of welded steel tubes was made in 1935 for the aviary of the Rome Zoo.[115] Aluminum reticular domes allow for large dimensions and short building times, suitable for sports arenas, exhibition centers, auditoriums, or storage facilities. The Dome of Discovery exhibition hall was built in London in 1951.[127] It was the largest domed building in the world at the time, 111 metres (365 ft) wide.[128][129] Other aluminum domes include the 61-meter-wide (200 ft) "Palasport" in Paris (1959) and the 125-meter-wide (410 ft) "Spruce Goose Dome" in Long Beach, California.[127]

The Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica.

Although the first examples were built 25 years earlier by Walther Bauersfeld, the term "geodesic domes" was coined by Buckminster Fuller, who received a patent for them in 1954. Geodesic domes have been used for radar enclosures, greenhouses, housing, and weather stations.[130] Early examples in the United States include a 16-metre (53 ft) dome for the Ford Rotunda in 1953 and a 117-metre (384 ft) diameter dome for the Baton Rouge facility of the Union Tank Car Company in 1958, the largest clear-span structure in the world at that time.[131] The U.S. Pavilion at Expo 67 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, was enclosed by a 76.5-meter-wide and 60-meter-tall dome made of steel pipes and acrylic panels. It is used today as a water monitoring center.[132] Other examples include the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, which was used from 1975 to 2003, and the Eden Project in the UK, built in 2000.[133]

"Grid-domes", using a structural grid of roughly orthogonal members adjusted to create a double-curved surface, were employed in 1989 to create a double-glazed glass dome over an indoor swimming pool in Neckarsulm, Germany, and a single-glazed glass dome over the courtyard of the Museum for Hamburg History in Hamburg, Germany.[134]

The 167-meter (548 ft) Osaka Dome and the 187-meter (614 ft) Nagoya Dome were completed in 1997.[97]

### Tension and membranes

Tensegrity domes, patented by Buckminster Fuller in 1962 from a concept by Kenneth Snelson, are membrane structures consisting of radial trusses made from steel cables under tension with vertical steel pipes spreading the cables into the truss form. They have been made circular, elliptical, and other shapes to cover stadiums from Korea to Florida.[135] While the first permanent air supported membrane domes were the radar domes designed and built by Walter Bird after World War II, the temporary membrane structure designed by David Geiger to cover the United States pavilion at Expo '70 was a landmark construction. Geiger's solution to a 90% reduction in the budget for the pavilion project was a "low profile cable-restrained, air-supported roof employing a superelliptical perimeter compression ring". Its very low cost led to the development of permanent versions using teflon-coated fiberglass and within 15 years the majority of the domed stadiums around the world used this system, including the 1975 Silverdome (168 meters) in Pontiac, Michigan.[136][97] Other examples include the 1982 Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome (180 meters), the 1983 BC Place (190 meters), and the 1988 Tokyo Dome (201 meters).[97] The restraining cables of such domes are laid diagonally to avoid the sagging perimeter found to occur with a standard grid.[137]

The Millennium Dome in London

Tension membrane design has depended upon computers, and the increasing availability of powerful computers resulted in many developments being made in the last three decades of the 20th century.[138] Weather-related deflations of some air-supported roofs led David Geiger to develop a modified type, the more rigid "Cabledome", that incorporated Fuller's ideas of tensegrity and aspension rather than being air-supported.[139][137] The example he built in St. Petersburg, Florida spans 230 meters.[140] The pleated effect seen in some of these domes is the result of lower radial cables stretching between those forming trusses in order to keep the membrane in tension. The lightweight membrane system used consists of four layers: waterproof fiberglass on the outside, insulation, a vapor barrier, then an acoustic insulation layer. This is semitransparent enough to fulfill most daytime lighting needs beneath the dome. The first large span examples were two Seoul, South Korea, sports arenas built in 1986 for the Olympics, one 93 meters wide and the other 120 meters wide. The Georgia Dome, built in 1992 on an oval plan, uses instead a triangulated pattern in a system patented as the "Tenstar Dome".[141] In Japan, the Izumo Dome was built in 1992 with a height of 49 meters and a diameter of 143 meters. It uses a PTFE-coated glass fiber fabric.[142] The first cable dome to use rigid steel frame panels as roofing instead of a translucent membrane was begun for an athletic center in North Carolina in 1994.[143] The Millennium Dome was completed as the largest cable dome in the world with a diameter of 320 meters and uses a different system of membrane support, with cables extending down from the 12 masts that penetrate the membrane.[140]

### Retractable domes and stadiums

The higher expense of rigid large span domes made them relatively rare, although rigidly moving panels is the most popular system for sports stadiums with retractable roofing.[137][144] With a span of 126 meters, Pittsburgh's Civic Arena featured the largest retractable dome in the world when completed for the city's Civic Light Opera in 1961. Six of its eight sections could rotate behind the other two within three minutes, and in 1967 it became the home of the Pittsburgh Penguins hockey team.[145]

The Assembly Hall arena at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign was completed in 1963 with a concrete saucer dome spanning 120 metres (400 ft). The edge of the dome was post-tensioned with more than 600 miles of steel cable.[146] The first domed baseball stadium, the Astrodome in Houston, Texas, was completed in 1965 with a rigid 641-foot-wide (195 m) steel dome filled with 4,596 skylights. Other early examples of rigid stadium domes include the steel frame Superdome of New Orleans and the cement Kingdome of Seattle.[137] The Louisiana Superdome has a span of 207 meters.[147] Stockholm's 1989 Ericsson Globe, an arena for ice hockey, earned the title of largest hemispherical building in the world with a diameter of 110 meters and height of 85 meters.[148]

Montreal's Olympic Stadium featured a retractable membrane roof in 1988, although repeated tearing led to its replacement with a non-retractable roof. The SkyDome of Toronto opened in 1989 with a rigid system in four parts: one that is fixed, two that slide horizontally, and one that rotates along the edge of the 213-meter-wide (699 ft) span. In Japan, the 1993 Fukuoka Dome featured a 222-meter dome in three parts, two of which rotated under the third.[149]

## Twenty-first century

The variety of modern domes over sports stadiums, exhibition halls, and auditoriums have been enabled by developments in materials such as steel, reinforced concrete and plastics.[150] Their uses over department stores and "futuristic video-hologram entertainment centres" exploit a variety of non-traditional materials.[151] The use of design processes that integrate numerical control machines, computer design, virtual reconstructions, and industrial prefabrication allow for the creation of dome forms with complex geometry, such as the 2004 ellipsoid bubbles of Nardini Company's production district designed by Massimiliano Fuksas.[152]

Ōita Stadium in Japan

Ōita Stadium was built in 2001 as a mostly fixed semi-spherical roof 274 meters wide with two large membrane-covered panels that can slide down from the center to opposite sides.[149] The Sapporo Dome was completed in 2001 with a span of 218 meters.[97] Singapore's National Stadium was completed in 2014 with the largest dome in the world at 310 meters in span. It uses a post-tensioned concrete ring beam to support steel trusses that enable two halves of a section of the dome to retract.[153]

## References

1. ↑ Gayle & Gayle 1998, p. 14.
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Sutherland 2000, p. 111.
3. ↑ Mainstone 2001, p. 241.
4. ↑ Lippincott 2008, p. 26.
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Mainstone 2001, p. 129.
6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Cowan 1983, p. 191.
7. ↑ Rehm 2018, pp. 175–181.
8. ↑ Rehm 2018, p. 181.
9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Cowan 1977, p. 17.
10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Huerta 2001, p. 58.
11. ↑ Huerta 2008, p. 309.
12. ↑ Bellini 2017, p. 3.
13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Huerta 2008, pp. 310, 311–312.
14. ↑ Cowan 1983, p. 183.
15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Kohlmaier & Von Sartory 1991, p. 126.
16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Kurrer 2012.
17. ↑ Sutherland 2000, pp. 116, 118.
18. ↑ Giustina 2003, p. 1033.
19. ↑ Allen 2004, pp. 69, 71.
20. ↑ Stephenson, Hammond & Davi 2005, p. 190.
21. ↑ Miller & Clinch 1998, p. 30.
22. ↑ Tyack 2015, pp. 141, 144, 147–148, 155.
23. ↑ Freeman-Grenville 1987, pp. 188, 195.
24. ↑ Perkin 1981, p. 10.
25. ↑ Gayle & Gayle 1998, pp. 13, 18, 26.
26. ↑ Skempton 2002, p. 785.
27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Sutherland 2000, p. 112.
28. ↑ Richardson 2001, p. 49.
29. ↑ Gayle & Gayle 1998, p. 23.
30. ↑ Alexander 2004, pp. 71–73.
31. ↑ Zanow & Johnston 2010, p. 22.
32. ↑ Alexander 2004, pp. 83–85.
33. ↑ Gayle & Gayle 1998, p. 24.
34. ↑ Sutherland 2000, p. 119.
35. ↑ Landeshauptstadt Mainz 2013.
36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 Silk, Gildenhard & Barrow 2017, p. 257.
37. ↑ Cowan 1977, p. 11.
38. ↑ Krasny 2003, pp. 197–198.
39. ↑ Krasny 2003, p. 200.
40. ↑ Krasny 2003, pp. 200–201.
41. ↑ Krasny 2003, p. 202.
42. ↑ Gayle & Gayle 1998, p. 26.
43. ↑ Fraser 1996, p. 129.
44. ↑ Scheunemann & Omilanowska 2012, p. 203.
45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 Sutherland 2000, p. 117.
46. ↑ 46.0 46.1 Sutherland 2000, p. 116.
47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 Sutherland 2000, pp. 115, 119.
48. ↑ Zanon et al. 2001.
49. ↑ Filemio 2009, pp. 139, 141.
50. ↑ Pavani 2020, pp. 478–479.
51. ↑ Wahid & Karsono 2009, p. 3.
52. ↑ Pevsner & Williamson 1978, p. 114.
53. ↑ Castex 2008, p. xli.
54. ↑ Gayle & Gayle 1998, pp. 22–23.
55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 Hourihane 2012, p. 304.
56. ↑ Alexander 2004, pp. 75–78.
57. ↑ Sutherland 2000, p. 115.
58. ↑ Coleman 2006, p. 32.
59. ↑ 59.0 59.1 Castex 2008, pp. 56–58.
60. ↑ Mark 1987, p. 142.
61. ↑ 61.0 61.1 Dimčić 2011, p. 8.
62. ↑ Sutherland 2000, p. 113.
63. ↑ Sutherland 2000, pp. 114, 119.
64. ↑ Hitchcock 1987, p. 177.
65. ↑ Kohlmaier & Von Sartory 1991, pp. 126–127.
66. ↑ Sutherland 2000, pp. 114–115.
67. ↑ Fatta, Campisi & Vinci 2016, p. 121.
68. ↑ British Museum.
69. ↑ Schreurs 2021, pp. 55, 57–59.
70. ↑ Le Cœur 2012, p. 151.
71. ↑ Young 1995, pp. 20, 22, 89, 100.
72. ↑ Cole & Reed 1997, p. 25.
73. ↑ 73.0 73.1 Allen 2004, p. 69.
74. ↑ Shearer & Shearer 2001, p. 85.
75. ↑ Allen 2001, p. 146.
76. ↑ King 2000, pp. 88–89.
77. ↑ King 2000, pp. 89–90.
78. ↑ King 2000, pp. 90, 92, 94.
79. ↑ 79.0 79.1 aoc.gov.
80. ↑ Condit 1968, p. 27.
81. ↑ Allen 2001, p. 226.
82. ↑ Mitchell 1985, p. 262.
83. ↑ Seale 1975, p. 14.
84. ↑ 84.0 84.1 King 2000, p. 93.
85. ↑ Goodsell 1993, pp. 294, 298–299.
86. ↑ Rizzoni 2009, p. 186.
87. ↑ Moravánszky 1998.
88. ↑ Villám et al. 2006, pp. 67–68, 74.
89. ↑ Mainstone 2001, p. 171.
90. ↑ Sutherland 2000, pp. 116–117, 119, 127.
91. ↑ Stern 1995, p. 754. sfn error: no target: CITEREFStern1995 (help)
92. ↑ King 2000, pp. 93, 97.
93. ↑ Krasny 2003, pp. 202–203.
94. ↑ Krasny 2003, pp. 203–205.
95. ↑ Misztal 2017, p. 253.
96. ↑ Misztal 2017, pp. 137–139.
97. ↑ 97.0 97.1 97.2 97.3 97.4 Takenaka Corporation 2000.
98. ↑ Misztal 2017, p. 137.
99. ↑ Fairley 2019, p. 217.
100. ↑ 100.0 100.1 APWA 1972, p. 11.
101. ↑ Cohn & Fleming 1974, p. 106.
102. ↑ 102.0 102.1 Pavlovic, Reccia & Cecchi 2014, p. 2.
103. ↑ Pavlovic, Reccia & Cecchi 2014, p. 3.
104. ↑ Ochsendork & Freeman 2010.
105. ↑ Sharp 2002, p. 49.
106. ↑ Mainstone 2001, p. 134.
107. ↑ Bradshaw et al. 2002, p. 693.
108. ↑ Langmead & Garnaut 2001, p. 131.
109. ↑ Marche 2005.
110. ↑ 110.0 110.1 110.2 Cowan 1977, p. 20.
111. ↑ Silk, Gildenhard & Barrow 2017, p. 261.
112. ↑ Muttoni 2011, p. 106.
113. ↑ Langmead & Garnaut 2001, p. 303.
114. ↑ Cowan 1977, p. 19.
115. ↑ 115.0 115.1 Morganti et al. 2019, p. 838.
116. ↑ Misztal 2017, p. 86.
117. ↑ 117.0 117.1 Levy & Salvadori 2002, p. 38.
118. ↑ Cottone & Bertorotta 2009, pp. 2, 8.
119. ↑ Cottone & Bertorotta 2009, pp. 5–8.
120. ↑ Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 693–694, 697.
121. ↑ Jelica & Sedmak 2020, pp. 1833–1834.
122. ↑ 122.0 122.1 McLean 2013.
123. ↑ Freeman-Grenville 1987, p. 188.
124. ↑ Perkin 1981, pp. 10–11.
125. ↑ Mitchell 1985, pp. 267–268.
126. ↑ Bradshaw et al. 2002, p. 705.
127. ↑ 127.0 127.1 Skejić, Boko & Torić 2015, p. 1081.
128. ↑ Sharp 2002, p. 187.
129. ↑ Cadbury-Brown 2001, p. 63.
130. ↑ Langmead & Garnaut 2001, pp. 131–132.
131. ↑ Zung 2002, p. 26.
132. ↑ Langmead & Garnaut 2001, p. 132.
133. ↑ Kádár 2011, p. 26.
134. ↑ Barnes & Dickson 2000, pp. 187–188.
135. ↑ Levy & Salvadori 2002, pp. 322–323.
136. ↑ Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 701–702.
137. ↑ 137.0 137.1 137.2 137.3 Charlier.
138. ↑ Bradshaw et al. 2002, pp. 700, 703.
139. ↑ Bradshaw et al. 2002, p. 703.
140. ↑ 140.0 140.1 Barnes & Dickson 2000, p. 13.
141. ↑ Nenadović 2010, pp. 58–60.
142. ↑ Silk, Gildenhard & Barrow 2017, p. 260.
143. ↑ Nenadović 2010, p. 59.
144. ↑ Friedman & Farkas 2011, p. 49.
145. ↑ Van Den Heuvel 2008, pp. 161–162.
146. ↑ Petroski 2011, p. 114.
147. ↑ Cowan 1983, p. 193.
148. ↑ Glenday 2008, p. 365.
149. ↑ 149.0 149.1 Friedman & Farkas 2011, pp. 42–43, 46.
150. ↑ McNeil 2002, p. 882.
151. ↑ Hourihane 2012, p. 303.
152. ↑ Morganti et al. 2019, p. 841.
153. ↑ Lewis & King 2014, p. 127.

## Bibliography

* Alexander, Robert L. (2004). Hayward, Mary Ellen; Shivers, Frank R. Jr.. eds. The Architecture of Baltimore: An Illustrated History (illustrated ed.). JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-801-87806-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=X-5DiZPRbXMC.
* Allen, Edward (2004). "Guastavino, Dieste, and the Two Revolutions in Masonry Vaulting". in Anderson, Stanford. Eladio Dieste: Innovation in Structural Art (illustrated ed.). Princeton Architectural Press. pp. 66–93. ISBN 978-1-568-98371-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=rsra8BBzb6oC.
* Allen, William C. (2001), Senate Document 106-29: History of the United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Design, Construction, and Politics, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CDOC-106sdoc29?null
* The APWA Reporter, Volumes 39–40, American Public Works Association, 1972, https://books.google.com/books?id=pqchAQAAMAAJ&q="Fitzpatrick+Dome"
* The United States Capitol Dome, Architect of the Capitol, https://www.aoc.gov/cc/capitol/dome.cfm, retrieved November 28, 2010
* Barnes, Michael R.; Dickson, Michael (2000). "Preface and Overview: The Evolution of Longspan Lightweight Structures". in Barnes, Michael R.; Dickson, Michael. Widespan Roof Structures (illustrated ed.). Thomas Telford. ISBN 978-0-727-72877-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=vp7u0LRgP5YC.
* Bellini, Federico (2017). "8 Vaults and Domes: Statics as an Art". Companion to the History of Architecture, Volume I, Renaissance and Baroque Architecture. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1–33. doi:10.1002/9781118887226.wbcha009. ISBN 978-1-118-88722-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118887226.wbcha009.
* Bradshaw, Richard; Campbell, David; Gargari, Mousa; Mirmiran, Amir; Tripeny, Patrick (June 1, 2002). "Special Structures: Past, Present, and Future". Journal of Structural Engineering (Madrid: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)) 128 (6): 691–709. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(691). https://web.mit.edu/4.464/www/SpecialStructures-Vol128No6.pdf.
* British Museum -- Reading Room, British Museum, https://www.britishmuseum.org/the_museum/the_building/reading_room.aspx, retrieved October 13, 2011
* Cadbury-Brown, H.T. (2001). "'A Good Time-and-a-Half Was Had by All'". Twentieth Century Architecture (Great Britain: The Twentieth Century Society) (5): 1–24.
* Castex, Jean (2008). Architecture of Italy. Reference Guides to National Architecture. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-32086-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=i4ZTbNRVWwIC.
* Charlier, Claude (1988), "After a While, Nothing Seems Strange in a Stadium with a 'Lid'", Smithsonian, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/PAPERS/smthsnian.html, retrieved February 28, 2013
* Managing Snow Removal and Ice Control Programs: A Practical Guide to the How, When, where and why of Effective Public Work Practices. Issue 42 of Special report (American Public Works Association), American Public Works Association, 1974, https://books.google.com/books?id=OA0KAQAAMAAJ&q=Fitzpatrick+Dome
* Cole, John Young; Reed, Henry Hope (1997). Small, Herbert. ed. The Library of Congress: the Art and Architecture of the Thomas Jefferson Building (illustrated ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-04563-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=1P_bTHtdTwkC.
* Coleman, Peter (2006). Shopping Environments (illustrated ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-750-66001-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=_oyMjtrOIvgC.
* Condit, Carl W. (1968). American Building: Materials and Techniques from the First Colonial Settlements to the Present (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/americanbuilding0000cond. "first cast iron dome."
* Cottone, Antonio; Bertorotta, Simona (2009), "New Domes for Old Churches (Palermo 1943)", Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History, 1, Cottbus, Germany, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Antonio-Cottone/publication/303403250_NEW_DOMES_FOR_OLD_CHURCES_PALERMO_1943/links/58244ff708ae7ea5be723adf/NEW-DOMES-FOR-OLD-CHURCES-PALERMO-1943.pdf
* Cowan, Henry J. (1977). "A History of Masonry and Concrete Domes in Building Construction". Building and Environment (Great Britain: Pergamon Press) 12 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(77)90002-6. Bibcode: 1977BuEnv..12....1C.
* Cowan, Henry J. (1983). "Domes: Ancient and Modern". Journal of the Royal Society of Arts (Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) 131 (5320): 181–198.
* Dimčić, Miloš (2011). "Structural Optimization of Grid Shells Based on Genetic Algorithms". Forschungsbericht 32. Stuttgart: Institut für Tragkonstruktionen und Konstruktives Entwerfen. ISBN 978-3-922302-32-2. http://www.programmingarchitecture.com/publications/Dimcic_PhD_2011.pdf. Retrieved 2015-03-13.
* Fairley, Grant D. (2019). Up to the Cottage: Memories of Muskoka. Lulu Press, Inc. ISBN 978-1-329-27064-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=Xf6rDwAAQBAJ.
* Fatta, Giovanni; Campisi, Tiziana; Vinci, Calogero (2016). "Timbrel vaults in Sicily: analysis of a little-known construction technique". Construction History (The Construction History Society) 31 (2): 107–132.
* Filemio, Valentina (2009). "Guarini, Juvarra e Antonelli. Segni e Simboli per Torino". in Williams, Kim. Nexus Network Journal 11,1: Architecture and Mathematics. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-764-38974-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=O2viVgK_LNAC.
* Fraser, Derek (1996). Buildings of Europe: Berlin. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. ISBN 0-7190-4022-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=RDq8AAAAIAAJ.
* Freeman-Grenville, G. S. P. (1987). "The Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem: History and Future". The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (Cambridge University Press) 119 (2): 187–207. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00140614.
* Friedman, Noémi; Farkas, György (2011). "Roof Structures in Motion: On Retractable and Deployable Roof Structures Enabling Quick Construction or Adaptation to External Excitations". Concrete Structures. pp. 41–50. http://fib.bme.hu/cs2011/vb2011 angol FRIEDMAN page41-50.pdf. Retrieved 2020-12-08.
* Gayle, Margot; Gayle, Carol (1998). Cast-iron architecture in America: the significance of James Bogardus (illustrated ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-73015-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=HwRRD6WBnOMC.
* Giustina, Irene (2003), "On the art and the culture of domes. Construction in Milan and Lombardy in the late sixteenth and in the first half of the seventeenth century", Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, Spain: Sociedad Española de Historia de la Construcción, pp. 1033–1042, http://www.sedhc.es/biblioteca/actas/CIHC1_101_Giustina I.pdf
* Glenday, Craig, ed (2008). Guinness World Records 2008. Bantam Books. ISBN 978-0-553-58995-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=rbZMg7CGnKYC.
* Goodsell, Charles T. (1993). "Political Meanings of the American State Capitol". Journal of Architectural and Planning Research (Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc.) 10 (4): 294–307.
* Hitchcock, Henry-Russell (1987). Architecture: Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05320-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=fyUBgspcsgAC.
* Hourihane, Colum, ed (2012). The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-539536-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=FtlMAgAAQBAJ.
* Huerta, Santigo (2001). "Mechanics of masonry vaults: The equilibrium approach". in Lourenço, Paulo B.; Roca, Pere. Historical Constructions 2001: possibilities of numerical and experimental techniques: proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar. Guimarães: University of Minho. pp. 47–69. ISBN 972-8692-01-3. https://oa.upm.es/569/1/X-1595_PDF._Huerta_2001._Mechanics_of_masonry_vaults.pdf.
* Huerta, Santiago (2008). "The analysis of masonry architecture: A historical approach: To the memory of professor Henry J. Cowan". Architectural Science Review (University of Sydney) 51 (4): 297–328. doi:10.3763/asre.2008.5136. https://oa.upm.es/1273/1/Huerta_Art_005_2008.pdf.
* Jelica, Mirjana; Sedmak, Aleksandar (2020). "The Largest Pre-stressed Concrete Dome in the World – the Case Study of "Hall 1 of the Belgrade Fair"". Procedia Structural Integrity (Elsevier B.V.) 28: 1833–1838. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.006.
* Kádár, Bálint (2011). "World Exhibitions as Laboratories for Structural Innovation". Periodica Polytechnica Architecture (Budapest University of Technology and Economics) 42 (1): 23–31. doi:10.3311/pp.ar.2011-1.03. https://www.pp.bme.hu/ar/article/view/3/3. Retrieved April 8, 2014.
* King, Julia (2000), "The American Dome: Symbol of Democracy", Domes. Papers Read at the Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain., Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain, pp. 83–98, http://www.openbibart.fr/item/display/10068/744799, retrieved 2020-09-07
* Kohlmaier, Georg; Von Sartory, Barna (1991). Houses of Glass: a Nineteenth-Century Building Type (illustrated ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-61070-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=whSQRim1yBkC.
* Krasny, Piotr (2003). "Architecture of the Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church in the Habsburg Monarchy ca. 1770-1914". Centropa. A Journal of Central European Architecture and Related Arts 3 (3): 194–207. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/2802/1/Krasny_Architecture_of_the_Ruthenian_Greek_Catholic_Church_2003.pdf.
* Kurrer, Karl-Eugen (2012). The History of the Theory of Structures: From Arch Analysis to Computational Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 848. ISBN 978-3-433-60134-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=BcbxRXYUFc0C.
* St. Martin's Cathedral -- 1000 years of city history, Landeshauptstadt Mainz, 2013, http://www.mainz.de/WGAPublisher/online/html/default/mkuz-5v9eue.en.0, retrieved February 20, 2013
* Langmead, Donald; Garnaut, Christine (2001). Encyclopedia of Architectural and Engineering Feats (3rd ed.). ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-112-0. https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofar0000lang.
* Le Cœur, Marc (2012). "The Bibliothèque Nationale: Between Rationalism and Illusionism". in Bélier, Corinne; Bergdoll, Barry; Le Cœur, Marc. Henri Labrouste: Structure Brought to Light. Museum of Modern Art. ISBN 978-0-870-70839-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=uDImUm3Dan4C.
* Levy, Matthys; Salvadori, Mario (2002). Why buildings Fall Down: How Structures Fail (illustrated, reprint ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-31152-5. https://archive.org/details/whybuildingsfall00levy_0.
* Lewis, Clive; King, Mike (2014). "Designing the world's largest dome: the National Stadium roof of Singapore Sports Hub". The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering (Taylor & Francis) 7 (3): 127–150. doi:10.1080/19373260.2014.911485.
* Lippincott, Kristen (2008). DK Eyewitness Books: Astronomy. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-756-64349-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=aoku6KOtT1IC&q=papier+mache+domes&pg=PA26.
* Mainstone, Rowland J. (2001). Developments in Structural Form (2nd ed.). Architectural Press. ISBN 978-0-7506-5451-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=l6fLIUFJhxwC.
* Marche, Jordan (2005). Theaters of Time and Space: American Planetaria, 1930–1970. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-813-53766-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=fA9YJxUKjMkC.
* Mark, Robert (March–April 1987). "Reinterpreting Ancient Roman Structure". American Scientist (Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society) 75 (2): 142–150. Bibcode: 1987AmSci..75..142M.
* McNeil, Ian, ed (2002). An Encyclopaedia of the History of Technology. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-98165-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=o7yJAgAAQBAJ.
* McLean, Will (2013). "Skill: Inflatable Concrete Domes". EMAP Publishing Ltd. https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/craft/skill-inflatable-concrete-domes.
* Miller, Judith; Clinch, Tim (1998). Classic Style (illustrated ed.). Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-84997-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=df_c8hDOJ3gC.
* Misztal, Barbara (2017). Wooden Domes: History and Modern Times. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-65741-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=G4Q_DwAAQBAJ.
* Mitchell, James H. (1985). "The Noble Dome". The Antioch Review (Antioch Review, Inc.) 43 (3): 261–271. doi:10.2307/4611482.
* Moravánszky, Ákos (1998). Competing Visions: Aesthetic Invention and Social Imagination in Central European Architecture, 1867–1918 (illustrated ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-13334-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=-TpdVmCpa3kC.
* Morganti, R.; Tosone, A.; Abita, M.; Di Donato, D. (2019), "Symbol and technique of steel domes in Italy", in Cruz, Paulo J.S., Structures and Architecture – Bridging the Gap and Crossing Borders: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Structures and Architecture (ICSA 2019), July 24–26, 2019, Lisbon, Portugal, CRC Press, pp. 835–842, ISBN 978-1-351-85815-1, https://books.google.com/books?id=mQSiDwAAQBAJ
* Muttoni, Aurelio (2011). The Art of Structures. EPFL Press. ISBN 978-2-940-22238-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=Wux5BBYyhMUC.
* Nenadović, Aleksandra (2010). "Development, Characteristics and Comparative Structural Analysis of Tensegrity Type Cable Domes". Spatium 22 (22): 57–66. doi:10.2298/spat1022057n. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-569X/2010/1450-569X1022057N.pdf.
* Ochsendork, John; Freeman, Michael (2010). Guastavino Vaulting: The Art of Structural Tile (illustrated ed.). Princeton Architectural Press. ISBN 978-1-56898-741-5.
* Pavani, Raffaella (2020). "Chapter 28 Challenging Mathematical Insights into Masonry Domes Over the Centuries". in Abali, Bilen Emek; Giorgio, Ivan. Vol 130 Developments and Novel Approaches in Nonlinear Solid Body Mechanics. Advanced Structured Materials. 130. Springer. pp. 469–479. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50460-1_28. ISBN 978-3-030-50460-1. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-50460-1_28.
* Pavlovic, Milorad; Reccia, Emanuele; Cecchi, Antonella (2014), "Limit analysis of masonry domes: the case of Hagia Sophia and Anime Sante", Conference: MONUBASIN – 9th International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterrean Basin, Ankara, Turkey, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266077785
* Perkin, George, ed (1981). "Jerusalem Dome". Concrete Quarterly (Cement and Concrete Association) July–Sept (130): 10–11. https://www.concretecentre.com/getmedia/00c9d385-e5d3-42f7-b210-6232e1eca35f/CQ_130_Autumn1981.PDF.aspx. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
* Petroski, Henry (2011). "Engineering: Arches and Domes". American Scientist (Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society) 99 (2): 111–115. doi:10.1511/2011.89.111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23019241. Retrieved December 14, 2018.
* Pevsner, Nikolaus (1978). Derbyshire. Revised by Elizabeth Williamson (illustrated, reprint ed.). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-140-71008-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=edzSoQBSbwQC.
* Richardson, Albert E. (2001). Monumental Classic Architecture in Great Britain and Ireland. Dover Publications. pp. 123. ISBN 978-0-486-41534-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=q9-Z04D2C0oC.
* Rizzoni, Giovanni (2009). "The Form of Parliaments & European Identity". in Rorato, Laura; Saunders, Anna. The Essence and the Margin: National Identities and Collective Memories in Contemporary European Culture. The Netherlands: Rodopi. pp. 183–198. ISBN 978-9-042-02571-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=bK2WQacwtLgC.
* Shearer, Benjamin F.; Shearer, Barbara S. (2001). State Names, Seals, Flags, and Symbols: A Historical Guide. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-313-09236-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=subEEAAAQBAJ.
* Scheunemann, Juergen; Omilanowska, Malgorzata (2012). DK Eyewitness Travel Guide: Berlin. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-756-69114-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=1rcgcb3SGWkC.
* Schreurs, Eireen (2021). "Transformative dialogues: on material knowing in architecture". in Schrijver, Lara. The tacit dimension: architecture knowledge and scientific research. Leuven University Press. pp. 55–67. doi:10.1353/book.83868. ISBN 978-94-6166-380-1. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/258/oa_edited_volume/chapter/2866998/pdf.
* Seale, William (1975). "Symbol as Architecture". Design Quarterly (Walker Art Center) (94/95): 14–15. doi:10.2307/4090872.
* Sharp, Dennis (2002). 20th Century Architecture: A Visual History (3rd, illustrated ed.). Images Publishing. ISBN 978-1-864-70085-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=mklcuKnGjr4C.
* Silk, Michael; Gildenhard, Ingo; Barrow, Rosemary (2017). The Classical Tradition: Art, Literature, Thought (illustrated ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-405-15550-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=qwEtDwAAQBAJ.
* Skempton, A. W. (2002). A biographical dictionary of civil engineers in Great Britain and Ireland: 1500–1830 (illustrated ed.). Thomas Telford. ISBN 978-0-7277-2939-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=jeOMfpYMOtYC.
* Skejić, Davor; Boko, Ivica; Torić, Neno (2015). "Aluminium as a material for modern structures". Gradevinar 67 (11): 1075–1085. doi:10.14256/JCE.1395.2015. http://w.casopis-gradjevinar.hr/assets/Uploads/JCE-67-2015-11-3-1395-EN.pdf.
* Stephenson, Davis; Hammond, Victoria; Davi, Keith F. (2005). Visions of Heaven: the Dome in European Architecture (illustrated ed.). Princeton Architectural Press. ISBN 978-1-56898-549-7.
* Template:Stern: New York
* Sutherland, James (2000), "19th Century Iron and Glass Domes", Domes. Papers Read at the Annual Symposium of the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain., Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain, pp. 111–130, http://www.openbibart.fr/item/display/10068/744792
* Takenaka Corporation (2000), Dome Transitions Map, Takenaka Corporation, http://www.takenaka.co.jp/takenaka_e/dome_e/history/tech/table.html, retrieved February 3, 2024
* Tyack, Geoffrey (2015). "A Pantheon for Horses: The Prince Regent's Dome and Stables at Brighton". Architectural History (SAHGB Publications Limited) 58: 141–158. doi:10.1017/S0066622X00002616.
* Van Den Heuvel, Dirk (2008). The Challenge of Change: Dealing with the Legacy of the Modern Movement (illustrated ed.). IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-586-03917-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=h75OICqWp74C.
* Villám, Judit; Szabó, Dániel; Gyarmati, György; Soltész, István; Sisa, József (2006). The Hungarian National Assembly. Budapest: Office of the National Assembly. ISBN 978-963-87318-5-2. http://www.mkogy.hu/fotitkar/angol/book_2006.pdf.
* Wahid, Julaihi; Karsono, Bambang (2009), "Alternative to Dome as a Symbol of Masjid and It's [sic Influence in Indonesian Masjid Design"], Proceedings of 2nd International Seminar on Islamic Thought, Islam and Muslims: Issues and Challenges, 6 – 7 October 2009, Department of Theology and Philosophy, Universiti Kabangsaan Malaysia, https://repository.unimal.ac.id/694/1/dome roof as symbol.pdf
* Rehm, Jörg (2018). "The first concrete dome in Germany? A church building using modern techniques". Building Knowledge, Constructing Histories: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Construction History (6ICCH 2018), July 9–13, 2018, Brussels, Belgium. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-429-01362-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=dFwPEAAAQBAJ.
* Young, Carolyn Ann (1995). The Glory of Ottawa: Canada's First Parliament Buildings (illustrated ed.). McGill-Queen's Press -- MQUP. ISBN 978-0-7735-1227-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=ylnGjgGExcwC.
* Zanon, Paolo; Bursi, Oreste S.; Erlicher, Silvano; Zonta, D.; Clemente, Paolo; Indirli, M. (2001). "Intervention Scenarios on the Basilica of San Gaudenzio Dome in Novara". 7th International Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures, Assisi, Italy, October 2–5, 2001 (Assisi, Italy). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257333114. Retrieved May 17, 2015.
* Zanow, Lois; Johnston, Sally (2010). Monuments to Heaven: Baltimore's Historic Houses of Worship (illustrated ed.). AuthorHouse. ISBN 978-1-452-08537-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=bgGj9QdBKQsC.
* Zung, Thomas T. K. (2002). Buckminster Fuller: Anthology for the New Millennium. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-28890-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=VWF_6f0UCkYC.

0.00

(0 votes)

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Engineering:History_of_modern_period_domes&oldid=4377973"