Classification of Clifford algebras

Short description: Classification in abstract algebra

In abstract algebra, in particular in the theory of nondegenerate quadratic forms on vector spaces, the finite-dimensional Clifford algebras for a nondegenerate quadratic form are completely classified as rings. In general, the Clifford algebra is either a central simple algebra or a direct sum of two copies of such an algebra. For Clifford algebras over real or complex field, this means that the Clifford algebra is isomorphic to a full matrix ring over R, C, or H (the quaternions), or to a direct sum of two such algebras that are (non-canonically) isomorphic. The dimensions of the matrix algebra, and what division ring (R, C, H) can be determined by the dimension of the vector space and invariants of the quadratic form (its signature, over the reals).

## Contents

* 1 Notation and conventions
* 2 Complex case
* 2.1 Complex spinors in even dimension
* 2.2 Proof of the structure theorem for complex Clifford algebras
* 2.3 Proof of the structure theorem for complex Clifford algebras
* 3 Real case
* 3.1 Classification of quadratic forms
* 3.2 Unit pseudoscalar
* 3.3 Center
* 3.4 Classification
* 3.5 Symmetries
* 3.6 Bott periodicity
* 3.7 Failure of symmetry under swapping p and q
* 4 General fields
* 4.1 Characteristic two
* 5 See also
* 6 References
* 7 Sources

## Notation and conventions

The Clifford product is the manifest ring product for the Clifford algebra, and all algebra homomorphisms in this article are with respect to this ring product. Other products defined within Clifford algebras, such as the exterior product, and other structure, such as the distinguished subspace of generators V, are not used here. This article uses the (+) sign convention for Clifford multiplication so that v2=Q(v)1 for all vectors v in the vector space of generators V, where Q is the quadratic form on the vector space V. We will denote the algebra of n × n matrices with entries in the division algebra K by Mn(K) or End(Kn). The direct sum of two such identical algebras will be denoted by Mn(K) ⊕ Mn(K), which is isomorphic to Mn(K ⊕ K).

## Complex case

The complex case is particularly simple: every nondegenerate quadratic form on a complex vector space is equivalent to the standard diagonal form

Q(u)=u12+u22+⋯+un2,

where n = dim(V), so there is essentially only one Clifford algebra for each dimension.[1][2] This is because over the complex numbers one may multiply a basis vector by i, so positive and negative squares are equivalent. We will denote the Clifford algebra on Cn with the standard quadratic form by Cln(C).

There are two separate cases to consider, according to whether n is even or odd. When n is even, the algebra Cln(C) is central simple and so by the Artin–Wedderburn theorem is isomorphic to a matrix algebra over C.[3][4]

When n is odd, the center includes not only the scalars but the pseudoscalars (degree n elements) as well. After rescaling the volume element by a nonzero complex scalar if necessary, one may choose a normalized pseudoscalar ω such that ω2 = 1.[5] Define the operators

P±=12(1±ω).

These two operators form a complete set of orthogonal idempotents, and since they are central they give a decomposition of Cln(C) into a direct sum of two algebras

Cln(𝐂)=Cln+(𝐂)⊕Cln−(𝐂),

where

Cln±(𝐂)=P±Cln(𝐂).

The algebras Cln±(C) are just the positive and negative eigenspaces of ω, and the P± are the corresponding projection operators. Since ω is odd, these algebras are exchanged by the involution α induced by v ↦ −v on the generating space:

α(Cln±(𝐂))=Cln∓(𝐂),

and are therefore isomorphic.[6] Each of these two summands is central simple and hence isomorphic to a matrix algebra over C. The sizes of the matrices are determined from the fact that the dimension of Cln(C) is 2n.[7][8] What one obtains is the following table:

Classification of complex Clifford algebras  n | Cln(C)  | Cl[0]n(C)  | N

|
|
|

even  | End(CN)  | End(CN/2) ⊕ End(CN/2)  | 2n/2
odd  | End(CN) ⊕ End(CN)  | End(CN)  | 2(n−1)/2

The even subalgebra Cl[0]n(C) is (non-canonically) isomorphic to Cln−1(C).[9][10] When n is even, the even subalgebra can be identified with the block diagonal matrices (after writing elements in 2 × 2 block form). When n is odd, the even subalgebra consists of those elements of End(CN) ⊕ End(CN) for which the two components are equal. Projection onto either factor then gives an isomorphism with Cln[0](C) ≅ End(CN).[11]

### Complex spinors in even dimension

The classification allows Dirac spinors and Weyl spinors to be defined in even dimension.[12][13]

In even dimension n, the Clifford algebra Cln(C) is isomorphic to End(CN), which has its fundamental representation on Δn := CN.[14][15] A complex Dirac spinor is an element of Δn. The word complex indicates that this is a module for a complex Clifford algebra, not merely that the underlying vector space is complex.

The even subalgebra Cln0(C) is isomorphic to End(CN/2) ⊕ End(CN/2) and therefore its spinor module decomposes as the direct sum of two irreducible representation spaces Δ+n ⊕ Δ−n, each isomorphic to CN/2.[16][17] A left-handed (respectively right-handed) complex Weyl spinor is an element of Δ+n (respectively, Δ−n).

### Proof of the structure theorem for complex Clifford algebras

The structure theorem may be proved inductively.[18][19] For the base cases, Cl0(C) is simply C ≅ End(C), while Cl1(C) is the algebra C ⊕ C ≅ End(C) ⊕ End(C), obtained by taking the unique generator to be γ1 = (1, −1).

One also needs Cl2(C) ≅ End(C2). The Pauli matrices give a concrete realization: if one sets γ1 = σ1 and γ2 = σ2, then these generate a copy of Cl2(C) whose span is all of End(C2).[20][21]

The inductive step is the standard 2-periodicity isomorphism

Cln+2(𝐂)≅Cln(𝐂)⊗Cl2(𝐂).

To construct it, let γa generate Cln(C), and let γ~1,γ~2 generate Cl2(C). Let ω = i\tilde\gamma_1 \tilde\gamma_2 be the chirality element in Cl2(C), so that ω2 = 1 and each γ~a anticommutes with ω.[22][23] Then one obtains generators for Cln+2(C) by setting

Γa=γa⊗ω(1≤a≤n),
Γn+1=1⊗γ~1,Γn+2=1⊗γ~2.

These satisfy the Clifford relations, so by the universal property of Clifford algebras they induce an isomorphism Cln(C) ⊗ Cl2(C) \to Cln+2(C).[24][25]

Finally, if n is even and Cln(C) ≅ End(CN), then

Cln+2(𝐂)≅End⁡(𝐂N)⊗End⁡(𝐂2)≅End⁡(𝐂2N).

Since 2N = 2(n+2)/2, this gives the even-dimensional case in dimension n+2. The odd-dimensional case follows similarly, using that tensor product distributes over direct sums.[26][27]

### Proof of the structure theorem for complex Clifford algebras

A standard proof proceeds from three ingredients: the low-dimensional base cases, the 2-periodicity isomorphism

Cln+2(𝐂)≅Cln(𝐂)⊗Cl2(𝐂),

and the identification of the even subalgebra

Cln+1(𝐂)0≅Cln(𝐂).

See, for example, (Porteous 1995) or (Lawson Michelsohn).[28][29]

For the base cases, one has

Cl0(𝐂)≅𝐂

and

Cl1(𝐂)≅𝐂⊕𝐂.

The first is immediate. For the second, if e is the generator with e2=1, then

P±=12(1±e)

are central orthogonal idempotents with P++P−=1, so the algebra splits as the direct sum of the two one-dimensional ideals 𝐂P+ and 𝐂P−.[30][31]

Next, one needs the two-dimensional case

Cl2(𝐂)≅M2(𝐂).

A concrete realization is obtained from the Pauli matrices:

γ1=σ1=(0110),γ2=σ2=(0−ii0).

These satisfy γiγj+γjγi=2δij, so by the universal property they define a homomorphism Cl2(𝐂)->M2(𝐂). Since the image contains 1,γ1,γ2,γ1γ2, it has dimension 4 and hence is all of M2(𝐂).[32][33]

The key step is the 2-periodicity isomorphism. Let γ1,…,γn generate Cln(𝐂), let γ~1,γ~2 generate Cl2(𝐂), and set

ω=iγ~1γ~2.

Then ω2=1 and ω anticommutes with both γ~1 and γ~2. Define elements of Cln(𝐂)⊗Cl2(𝐂) by

Γa=γa⊗ω(1≤a≤n),
Γn+1=1⊗γ~1,Γn+2=1⊗γ~2.

Because ω2=1 and ω anticommutes with the generators of Cl2(𝐂), the elements Γ1,…,Γn+2 satisfy the Clifford relations for the standard quadratic form on 𝐂n+2. Therefore the universal property gives a homomorphism

Cln+2(𝐂)->Cln(𝐂)⊗Cl2(𝐂).

Both algebras have dimension 2n+2, so this homomorphism is an isomorphism.[34][35]

It follows by induction on m that

Cl2m(𝐂)≅Cl0(𝐂)⊗Cl2(𝐂)⊗m≅M2m(𝐂).

Indeed, the case m=0 is Cl0(𝐂)≅𝐂, and each application of 2-periodicity tensors with Cl2(𝐂)≅M2(𝐂), doubling the matrix size.[36][37]

For odd dimension, let n=2m+1. The volume element ω=e1e2⋯en is central because n is odd, and over 𝐂 it may be rescaled so that ω2=1. Hence

P±=12(1±ω)

are central orthogonal idempotents, giving a decomposition

Cl2m+1(𝐂)=Cl2m+1+(𝐂)⊕Cl2m+1−(𝐂).

On the other hand, the even subalgebra is isomorphic to Cl2m(𝐂), and projection onto either summand identifies each simple factor with that even subalgebra. Since

Cl2m(𝐂)≅M2m(𝐂),

one obtains

Cl2m+1(𝐂)≅M2m(𝐂)⊕M2m(𝐂).[38][39]

This proves the classification:

Cl2m(𝐂)≅M2m(𝐂),Cl2m+1(𝐂)≅M2m(𝐂)⊕M2m(𝐂).

Equivalently, the complex Clifford algebras are 2-periodic, and the even subalgebra of Cln+1(𝐂) is isomorphic to Cln(𝐂).[40][41]

## Real case

The real case is significantly more complicated, exhibiting a periodicity of 8 rather than 2, and there is a 2-parameter family of Clifford algebras.[42][43]

### Classification of quadratic forms

Firstly, there are non-isomorphic quadratic forms of a given degree, classified by signature.[44]

Every nondegenerate quadratic form on a real vector space is equivalent to a diagonal form

Q(u)=u12+⋯+up2−up+12−⋯−up+q2

where n = p \+ q is the dimension of the vector space. The pair of integers (p, q) is called the signature of the quadratic form.[44] The real vector space with this quadratic form is often denoted Rp,q. The Clifford algebra on Rp,q is denoted Clp,q(R).

A standard orthonormal basis {ei} for Rp,q consists of n = p \+ q mutually orthogonal vectors, p of which have norm +1 and q of which have norm −1.[44]

### Unit pseudoscalar

See also: Pseudoscalar

Given a standard basis {ei} as defined in the previous subsection, the unit pseudoscalar in Clp,q(R) is defined as

ω=e1e2⋯en.

It is the Clifford-algebra analogue of the volume element.[42][43]

To compute the square ω2 = (e1e2\cdots en)(e1e2\cdots en), one may reverse the order of the second factor and then commute equal basis vectors together. This introduces the sign (−1)n(n−1)/2, and since ei2 = +1 for i \le p and ei2 = -1 for the remaining q basis vectors, one obtains[42][43]

ω2=(−1)n(n−1)2(−1)q=(−1)(p−q)(p−q−1)2={+1p−q≡0,1(mod4)−1p−q≡2,3(mod4).

Note that, unlike the complex case, it is not in general possible to find a pseudoscalar that squares to +1.

### Center

If n (equivalently, p − q) is even, the algebra Clp,q(R) is central simple and so isomorphic to a matrix algebra over R or H by the Artin–Wedderburn theorem.[42][43]

If n is odd then the algebra is no longer central simple: its center contains the pseudoscalar as well as the scalars.[42][43] If n is odd and ω2 = +1 (equivalently, if p − q ≡ 1 (mod 4)) then, just as in the complex case, the algebra Clp,q(R) decomposes into a direct sum of isomorphic algebras

Clp,q(𝐑)=Clp,q+(𝐑)⊕Clp,q−(𝐑),

each of which is central simple and so isomorphic to a matrix algebra over R or H.[42][43]

If n is odd and ω2 = −1 (equivalently, if p − q ≡ −1 (mod 4)) then the center of Clp,q(R) is isomorphic to C, and the algebra may be regarded as a complex central simple algebra; hence it is isomorphic to a matrix algebra over C.[42][43]

### Classification

All told there are three properties which determine the class of the algebra Clp,q(R):[42][43]

* signature mod 2: n is even/odd, determining whether the algebra is central simple or not;
* signature mod 4: ω2 = ±1, determining in the odd-dimensional case whether the center is R ⊕ R or C;
* signature mod 8: the Brauer class of the algebra (n even) or of the even subalgebra (n odd), determining whether the central simple factor is split or quaternionic.

Each of these properties depends only on the signature p − q modulo 8. The complete classification table is given below. The size of the matrices is determined by the requirement that Clp,q(R) have dimension 2p+q.[42][43]

p − q mod 8  | ω2 | Clp,q(R)
(N = 2(p+q)/2) |  | p − q mod 8  | ω2 | Clp,q(R)
(N = 2(p+q−1)/2)

|
|
|
|
|
|

0 | + | MN(R)  | 1 | + | MN(R) ⊕ MN(R)
2 | − | MN(R)  | 3 | − | MN(C)
4 | + | MN/2(H)  | 5 | + | MN/2(H) ⊕ MN/2(H)
6 | − | MN/2(H)  | 7 | − | MN(C)

It may be seen that of all matrix-ring types mentioned, there is only one type shared by complex and real algebras: the type M2m(C). For example, Cl2(C) and Cl3,0(R) are both isomorphic to M2(C). It is important to distinguish the categories in which these isomorphisms are taken: Cl2(C) is classified as a C-algebra, whereas Cl3,0(R) is classified as an R-algebra. Thus the two are R-algebra isomorphic, but not canonically as complex algebras.[42]

A table of this classification for p \+ q ≤ 8 follows. Here p \+ q runs vertically and p − q runs horizontally (e.g. the algebra Cl1,3(R) ≅ M2(H) is found in row 4, column −2).[42][43]

| 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | −1 | −2 | −3 | −4 | −5 | −6 | −7 | −8

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | R |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | R2 |  | C |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2 |  |  |  |  |  |  | M2(R) |  | M2(R) |  | H |  |  |  |  |  |
3 |  |  |  |  |  | M2(C) |  | M22(R) |  | M2(C) |  | H2 |  |  |  |  |
4 |  |  |  |  | M2(H) |  | M4(R) |  | M4(R) |  | M2(H) |  | M2(H) |  |  |  |
5 |  |  |  | M22(H) |  | M4(C) |  | M24(R) |  | M4(C) |  | M22(H) |  | M4(C) |  |  |
6 |  |  | M4(H) |  | M4(H) |  | M8(R) |  | M8(R) |  | M4(H) |  | M4(H) |  | M8(R) |  |
7 |  | M8(C) |  | M24(H) |  | M8(C) |  | M28(R) |  | M8(C) |  | M24(H) |  | M8(C) |  | M28(R) |
8 | M16(R) |  | M8(H) |  | M8(H) |  | M16(R) |  | M16(R) |  | M8(H) |  | M8(H) |  | M16(R) |  | M16(R)
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
ω2 | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | \+

### Symmetries

There is a tangled web of symmetries and relationships in the above table. Most importantly, one has the standard real-periodicity isomorphisms[42][43]

Clp+1,q+1(𝐑)≅Clp,q(𝐑)⊗M2(𝐑),Clq,p+2(𝐑)≅Clp,q(𝐑)⊗𝐇,Clq+2,p(𝐑)≅Clp,q(𝐑)⊗M2(𝐑).

In terms of the table, the first rule says that going down one step from the Clifford algebra Clp,q(𝐑) yields Clp+1,q+1(𝐑), which consists of 2×2 matrices over Clp,q(𝐑). The other two rules imply that

Clp+4,q(𝐑)≅Clp,q+4(𝐑)

and from these one obtains Bott periodicity in the form

Clp+8,q(𝐑)≅Clp+4,q+4(𝐑)≅Clp,q+8(𝐑)≅M16(Clp,q(𝐑)).[42][43]

Furthermore, if the signature satisfies p − q ≡ 1 (mod 4) then

Clp+k,q(𝐑)≅Clp,q+k(𝐑).

This says that the table is symmetric about columns where p−q= ..., −7, −3, 1, 5, 9,....[42]

### Bott periodicity

The 8-fold periodicity over the real numbers is part of Bott periodicity, the corresponding periodicity for the homotopy groups of the stable orthogonal group; similarly, over the complex numbers one has 2-fold periodicity for the stable unitary group. In Bott's geometric description, the relevant loop spaces are modeled by successive quotients of the classical groups, which are compact symmetric spaces. In stable group theory, loop spaces enter because Bott periodicity identifies the stable classical groups, up to homotopy, with iterated loop spaces of the corresponding classifying spaces. The matching 2-fold and 8-fold algebraic periodicities of complex and real Clifford algebras are part of the same picture.[45][46]

### Failure of symmetry under swapping p and q

Note that in the real classification, in general,

Clp,q(𝐑)≇Clq,p(𝐑).

In the sign convention used in this article, exchanging p and q replaces the quadratic form by its negative, so it sends the signature difference p − q to q − p = −(p − q). Since the isomorphism class of the real Clifford algebra is determined by p − q (mod 8), one should compare the entries in the classification table for residues d and −d modulo 8.[47][48]

These entries agree only when d ≡ −d (mod 8), that is, only when d ≡ 0 or 4 (mod 8). In all other congruence classes, the algebras are of different types. For example,

Cl1,0(𝐑)≅𝐑⊕𝐑,Cl0,1(𝐑)≅𝐂,

while

Cl2,0(𝐑)≅M2(𝐑),Cl0,2(𝐑)≅𝐇.

So the failure of symmetry appears already in the first few low-dimensional cases.[49][50]

There are two different mechanisms behind this asymmetry. In odd dimension, the distinction is visible in the center. If p − q ≡ 1 (mod 4), then ω2 = +1 and the algebra splits as a direct sum of two simple ideals, so its center is R⊕R. If instead p − q ≡ −1 (mod 4), then ω2 = −1 and the center is C. Thus swapping p and q can change the center from split real to complex.[51][52]

In even dimension, both algebras are central simple, so the distinction is instead in their Brauer classes. For example, when p − q ≡ 2 (mod 8) the algebra is a split matrix algebra over R, while when q − p ≡ 2 (mod 8)—equivalently p − q ≡ 6 (mod 8)—the algebra is a matrix algebra over H. So swapping p and q can also change a split algebra into a quaternionic one.[53][54]

Equivalently, one has

Clp,q(𝐑)≅Clq,p(𝐑)

if and only if p − q ≡ 0 or 4 (mod 8). This is simply the fixed-point condition for the involution d↦−d on the real classification table.[55][56]

This is one reason sign conventions matter in the literature: authors using the opposite convention for Clifford multiplication often write Clp,q for what this article denotes by Clq,p. The non-symmetry under (p,q)↦(q,p) is a property of real Clifford algebras, not just a notational artefact.[57][58]

This asymmetry belongs to the full Clifford algebra, not to the spin group. Let (V,q) be a real quadratic space. The spin group is defined inside the even Clifford algebra by

Spin⁡(V,q)=Pin⁡(V,q)∩Cl0(V,q),

where Pin(V,q) is generated by the unit vectors v with q(v)=± 1.[59][60] Under the standard twisted-adjoint action, such a vector acts on V by reflection in the hyperplane orthogonal to v, so products of an even number of unit vectors act by orientation-preserving orthogonal transformations.[61][62]

Now replacing q by −q does not change the orthogonal group: the same linear maps preserve q and −q, so O(V,q)=O(V,−q) and hence SO(V,q)=SO(V,−q).[63] This is why one has SO(p,q) ≅ SO(q,p) and correspondingly Spin(p,q) ≅ Spin(q,p). The point is that although the Clifford algebras need not be the same, the spin group is built from even products of the same reflections, inside the even Clifford algebra.[64][65]

The lowest-dimensional examples already show the distinction. In the sign convention used in this article,

Cl1,0(𝐑)≅𝐑⊕𝐑,Cl0,1(𝐑)≅𝐂,

so the full algebras are different, but in both cases the even subalgebra is just R. Hence

Spin⁡(1,0)≅Spin⁡(0,1)≅{±1}.

A more instructive example is

Cl2,0(𝐑)≅M2(𝐑),Cl0,2(𝐑)≅𝐇.

Here the full algebras, and therefore their irreducible real modules, are of different types: in the first case the irreducible module is real 2-dimensional, whereas in the second it is quaternionic 1-dimensional. But the spin group only sees the even subalgebra. In both signatures the even subalgebra is generated by 1 and the bivector e1e2, and

(e1e2)2=−e12e22=−1.

Therefore

Cl2,00(𝐑)≅Cl0,20(𝐑)≅𝐂,

and in either case the spin group is the circle group

{cos⁡θ+sin⁡θe1e2:θ∈𝐑}≅U(1).

So the full Clifford algebra can distinguish real and quaternionic module types even when the associated spin group cannot: after passing to the even subalgebra, both cases are governed by the same complex structure.[66][67]

The same phenomenon persists in higher dimensions. For example, although Cl1,3(𝐑) and Cl3,1(𝐑) are different entries in the real classification table, the associated spin groups are both the double cover of the Lorentz group; in particular

Spin⁡(1,3)≅SL2(𝐂),

and hence also Spin⁡(3,1)≅SL2(𝐂).[68][69]

## General fields

Let F be a field of characteristic not 2, and let q be a nondegenerate quadratic form on a finite-dimensional F-vector space V.[70] Over such a field, the classification of Clifford algebras is naturally expressed in terms of the center and a Brauer class rather than by a periodic matrix table.

If dim⁡V=2m is even, then the full Clifford algebra Cl⁡(V,q) is a central simple algebra over F. Its Brauer class

c(q):=[Cl⁡(V,q)]∈Br⁡(F)

is called the Clifford invariant of q. The center of the even Clifford algebra Cl0(V,q) is the quadratic étale F-algebra

Z(q)=F[x]/(x2−δ(q)),

where δ(q)=(−1)mdet⁡(q) is the signed discriminant of q. Thus Z(q) is either a separable quadratic extension field of F or the split algebra F⊕F.

If dim⁡V=2m+1 is odd, then the even Clifford algebra Cl0(V,q) is central simple over F. In this case the relevant Clifford invariant is

c(q):=[Cl0(V,q)]∈Br⁡(F),

while the full Clifford algebra has center Z(q) and satisfies

Cl⁡(V,q)≅Cl0(V,q)⊗FZ(q).

Thus, in odd dimension, the isomorphism class of the full Clifford algebra is determined by the quadratic étale center Z(q) together with the Brauer class c(q).[70]

An explicit computation of c(q) may be made after diagonalizing

q≅⟨a1,…,an⟩.

The associated Hasse invariant is the 2-torsion Brauer class

s(q)=∏1≤i<j≤n(ai,aj)∈Br⁡(F)[2],

where (ai,aj) denotes the class of the quaternion algebra generated by i,j with i2=ai, j2=aj, and ij=−ji. The Clifford invariant is obtained from the Hasse invariant by a universal correction depending only on nmod8:

c(q)=s(q)⋅{1,n≡1,2(mod8),(−1,−det⁡q),n≡3,4(mod8),(−1,−1),n≡5,6(mod8),(−1,det⁡q),n≡0,7(mod8).

Here det⁡q is the determinant of a Gram matrix, viewed in F×/F×2. In this sense, the Brauer class of the relevant Clifford algebra is the standard Clifford invariant of the quadratic form.[70]

Over 𝐑, this recovers the usual real classification table above. The Brauer group Br⁡(𝐑) has two elements, represented by the split class and the class of the quaternion algebra 𝐇. For a diagonal form of signature (p,q), the Hasse invariant is

s(q)=[𝐇](q2),

since over 𝐑 the quaternion class (a,b) is nontrivial exactly when both a and b are negative. The formula above therefore determines abstractly whether the relevant central simple algebra is split or quaternionic. In even dimension this yields matrix algebras over 𝐑 or 𝐇; in odd dimension one combines the same Brauer-class computation for Cl0(V,q) with the center Z(q), which is either 𝐑×𝐑 or 𝐂. When Z(q)≅𝐂, the full Clifford algebra is a complex matrix algebra, because

𝐂⊗𝐑𝐇≅M2(𝐂).[70]

The same viewpoint extends to nonarchimedean local fields.[71] If K is a local field of characteristic not 2, then quadratic spaces over K are classified up to isometry by dimension, determinant, and Clifford invariant; equivalently, one may use dimension, determinant, and Hasse invariant. The Brauer group Br⁡(K) has exactly two elements of order dividing 2, namely the split class and the class of the unique quaternion division algebra over K. Accordingly, the Brauer-class part of the Clifford-algebra classification over K is especially simple. If q has even dimension 2m, then Cl⁡(q) is isomorphic either to M2m(K) or to M2m−1(D), where D is the quaternion division algebra over K. If q has odd dimension 2m+1, then Cl0(q) is isomorphic either to M2m(K) or to M2m−1(D); the full Clifford algebra is then obtained from Cl0(q) by adjoining its quadratic étale center. In practice one diagonalizes q, computes the Hilbert-symbol product s(q)=∏i<j(ai,aj), and then obtains c(q) from the same formula relating Hasse and Clifford invariants.[71]

### Characteristic two

The preceding discussion assumed that the ground field has characteristic different from 2. In characteristic 2, the polar form of a quadratic form is alternating, so a nonsingular quadratic space must have even dimension.[72] Odd-dimensional forms are still important, but they are treated using the theory of regular (or “1/2-regular”) quadratic forms rather than the nonsingular theory.[73]

For this reason, the characteristic-2 theory is usually formulated not only in terms of quadratic forms, but in terms of quadratic pairs on central simple algebras. In that setting the discriminant and the even Clifford algebra are defined for quadratic pairs and play the role of the corresponding invariants in characteristic different from 2.[74] Accordingly, there is no direct analogue of the real-signature classification table in characteristic 2 without first reformulating the theory in this language.

## See also

* Clifford algebra
* Dirac algebra Cl1,3(C)
* Pauli algebra Cl3,0(R)
* Spacetime algebra Cl1,3(R)
* Clifford module
* Spin representation

## References

1. ↑ Lam 2005
2. ↑ Porteous 1995
3. ↑ Porteous 1995
4. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
5. ↑ Porteous 1995
6. ↑ Porteous 1995
7. ↑ Porteous 1995
8. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
9. ↑ Porteous 1995
10. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
11. ↑ Porteous 1995
12. ↑ Hamilton, Mark J. D. (2017). Mathematical gauge theory : with applications to the standard model of particle physics. Cham, Switzerland. pp. 346–347. ISBN 9783319684383.
13. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
14. ↑ Hamilton, Mark J. D. (2017). Mathematical gauge theory : with applications to the standard model of particle physics. Cham, Switzerland. pp. 346–347. ISBN 9783319684383.
15. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
16. ↑ Hamilton, Mark J. D. (2017). Mathematical gauge theory : with applications to the standard model of particle physics. Cham, Switzerland. pp. 346–347. ISBN 9783319684383.
17. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
18. ↑ Porteous 1995
19. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
20. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
21. ↑ Porteous 1995
22. ↑ Porteous 1995
23. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
24. ↑ Porteous 1995
25. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
26. ↑ Porteous 1995
27. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
28. ↑ Porteous 1995
29. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
30. ↑ Porteous 1995
31. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
32. ↑ Porteous 1995
33. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
34. ↑ Porteous 1995
35. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
36. ↑ Porteous 1995
37. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
38. ↑ Porteous 1995
39. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
40. ↑ Porteous 1995
41. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
42. ↑ 42.00 42.01 42.02 42.03 42.04 42.05 42.06 42.07 42.08 42.09 42.10 42.11 42.12 42.13 Lam 2005, ch. V, §§2–4
43. ↑ 43.00 43.01 43.02 43.03 43.04 43.05 43.06 43.07 43.08 43.09 43.10 43.11 Porteous 1995
44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 Lam 2005, ch. I, §2
45. ↑ Bott, Raoul (1970). "The periodicity theorem for the classical groups and some of its applications". Advances in Mathematics 4: 353–411.
46. ↑ Atiyah, Michael F.; Bott, Raoul; Shapiro, Arnold (1964). "Clifford modules". Topology 3 (Suppl. 1): 3–38. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(64)90003-5.
47. ↑ Lam 2005, ch. V, §§2–4
48. ↑ Porteous 1995
49. ↑ Lam 2005, ch. V, §§2–4
50. ↑ Porteous 1995
51. ↑ Lam 2005, ch. V, §§2–4
52. ↑ Porteous 1995
53. ↑ Lam 2005, ch. V, §§2–4
54. ↑ Porteous 1995
55. ↑ Lam 2005, ch. V, §§2–4
56. ↑ Porteous 1995
57. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
58. ↑ Porteous 1995
59. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
60. ↑ Porteous 1995
61. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
62. ↑ Porteous 1995
63. ↑ Porteous 1995
64. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
65. ↑ Porteous 1995
66. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
67. ↑ Porteous 1995
68. ↑ Lawson & Michelsohn 2016
69. ↑ Porteous 1995
70. ↑ 70.0 70.1 70.2 70.3 Lam 2005, pp. 108–126
71. ↑ 71.0 71.1 Lam 2005, pp. 150–167
72. ↑ Knus, Max-Albert; Merkurjev, Alexander; Rost, Markus; Tignol, Jean-Pierre (1998). The Book of Involutions. American Mathematical Society. pp. xx.
73. ↑ Knus, Max-Albert. "Quadratic Forms, Clifford Algebras and Spinors". pp. 14–15. https://people.math.ethz.ch/~knus/papers/campinas.pdf.
74. ↑ Knus, Max-Albert; Merkurjev, Alexander; Rost, Markus; Tignol, Jean-Pierre (1998). The Book of Involutions. American Mathematical Society. pp. xx.

## Sources

* Budinich, Paolo; Trautman, Andrzej (1988). The Spinorial Chessboard. Springer Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-19078-3.
* Lam, T. Y. (2005). Introduction to Quadratic Forms over Fields. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. 67. American Mathematical Society.
* Lawson, H. Blaine; Michelsohn, Marie-Louise (2016). Spin Geometry. Princeton Mathematical Series. 38. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-8391-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=xfgbDAAAQBAJ&pg=PP1.
* Porteous, Ian R. (1995). Clifford Algebras and the Classical Groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. 50. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-55177-9.

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification of Clifford algebras. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Classification_of_Clifford_algebras&oldid=4296245"