Trinity County Hotel Tax Increase, Measure W (November 2015)

Voting on taxes

Ballot measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
| Local

City taxes
County taxes
School taxes
Property taxes
Sales taxes
Income taxes
Other taxes
Measure info

Amount: Increase to 10%
Expires: Never

## Contents

* 1 Election results
* 2 Text of measure
* 2.1 Ballot question
* 3 Support
* 3.1 Supporters
* 3.2 Arguments in favor
* 3.2.1 Official argument
* 4 Opposition
* 4.1 Opponents
* 4.2 Arguments against
* 4.2.1 Official argument
* 5 Path to the ballot
* 6 Recent news
* 7 See also
* 8 External links
* 9 Footnotes

A hotel tax incrase was on the ballot for voters in Trinity County, California, on November 3, 2015. It was defeated.

Measure W would have increased the county's hotel tax from 5 percent to 10 percent, with revenue earmarked in the following way:

* 30 percent for tourism marketing
* 20 percent for county volunteer fire departments
* 50 percent for the sheriff's department

In 2019, the percentages would have changed to:

* 50 percent for tourism marketing
* 30 percent for the sheriff's department
* 20 percent for the fire departments

The ballot question stated that the county would not be authorized to collect more than $2 million in additional revenue from this tax. Critics of the tax pointed out that the average revenue from the last five years for the county's existing 5 percent tax was about $213,000.[1]

A two-thirds (66.67%) vote was required for the approval of Measure W.

## Election results[edit]

Trinity County, Measure W

Result| Votes| Percentage
d No| 1,112| 41.32%
Yes|  1,579|  58.68%

Election results from Trinity County Elections Office

## Text of measure[edit]

### Ballot question[edit]

The following question appeared on the ballot:[2]

“  |

Shall the County of Trinity adopt an ordinance amending section 3.28 of the Trinity County Code by imposing a special five percent (5%) tax charged to guests of hotels and motels under the County’s Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance for the purpose of providing more funding to local law enforcement, fire protection and promotion of tourism, with the maximum amount collected not exceeding two million dollars $2,000,000 per calendar year?[3]

| ”

|
|

## Support[edit]

### Supporters[edit]

Representatives of the following groups and organizations signed the official argument in favor of Measure W:[4]

* Trinity County Board of Supervisors
* Trinity County Arts Council
* Trinity County Friends of the Library

### Arguments in favor[edit]

#### Official argument[edit]

The following official argument was submitted in favor of Measure W:

“  |

To support and grow our local tourism economy, and to partially address the increased demand on public safety, the Trinity County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution for a special election to create an additional special transient occupancy tax of 5%.

Measure W increases the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) from 5% to 10%, collected by hotels from their guests. A portion of those funds have historically been used for the purpose of promoting Trinity County to increase overall tourism, an important economic sector for the county. Shasta and Humboldt Counties currently collect 10% from hotelguests and have focused heavily on tourism as part of their economic future.

While some of this new revenue will go towards tourism promotion, there will also be funding dedicated to public safety to support the Sheriff's Department and County Volunteer Fire Departments, both of which have increased demand and need. The breakdown for each year is: 30% Tourism Marketing, 20% County Volunteer Fire Departments and 50% to the Sheriffs Department. In 2019, the percentages shift to 50% for Marketing, 30% for the Sheriff Department and 20% continues for the fire departments. Because this special tax requires 2/3 approval, not just 5O% +1, this revenue can only be used for these three functions and stated purposes, as specified, every year.

As tourism increases with the help of these additional marketing funds TOT dollars should increase overall, providing a natural revenue increase to these specific entities every year. A stronger tourism economy also enhances stability in other local businesses which strengthens the overall economy. We believe that the voters of Trinity County can make an informed decision about their support for expanding our local tourism economy and these vital public safety services.

Please support Measure W and help your community.[3]

| ”

|
|

—The Trinity County Board of Supervisors, the Trinity County Arts Council and the Trinity County Friends of the Library[4]

## Opposition[edit]

### Opponents[edit]

Arnold Whitridge signed the official argument in opposition to Measure W:[1]

### Arguments against[edit]

#### Official argument[edit]

The following official argument was submitted in opposition to Measure W:

“  |

Measure W is chiefly a proposed response to problems associated with the marijuana industry in our county. Unfortunately, it's insufficient for the purpose, not the best tool for the job, and a poor substitute for effective action by the County. Please consider:

1\. The proposition is potentially misleading by its reference to raising not more than $2,000,000. Based on the five most recent years, the new tax would in fact generate an annual average of $213,000 (actually $170,000 useable, once tax collection administrative costs are deducted), nothing close to $2,000,000. The revenues would not be required to combat problems caused by illegal marijuana, and are not nearly enough to take meaningful steps toward the announced purposes. This relatively small dribble of tax money is not a solution for anything, it's more an attempt to divert public attention from County inaction.

2\. The proposition does not guarantee that the tax revenue would result in net increased county spending on the announced purposes, only that these particular tax revenues would be earmarked for those purposes. Meanwhile county general funds in the affected budgets could be reduced or diverted to other purposes.

3\. AB 266 which is now in the California's legislature would authorize a county to impose a tax on the cultivation, processing, and dispensing of medical marijuana. That tax would be for specific purposes like marijuana related code enforcement, and enforcement of existing criminal laws, which still define cultivation and possession for sale of non-medical marijuana as felonies.

Let's require the County to get its act together before doubling the tax on innocent visitors, and let's put our efforts into backing proposals like AB 266 that are more reliably focused on marijuana issues.[3]

| ”

|
|

—Arnold Whitridge[1]

## Path to the ballot[edit]

Measure W was put on the ballot by a vote of the Trinity County Board of Supervisors.[2]

## Recent news[edit]

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Trinity County hotel tax Measure W. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

Trinity County Hotel Tax Increase, Measure W (November 2015) - Google News

## See also[edit]

* Local hotel tax on the ballot
* Trinity County, California ballot measures
* November 3, 2015 ballot measures in California

## External links[edit]

| Suggest a link

|

* Trinity County Elections Office website

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Trinity County Elections, "Argument against Measure W," accessed October 13, 2015
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Trinity County Elections, "Legal Notice for Measure W," accessed October 5, 2015
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Trinity County Elections, "Argument in favor of Measure W," accessed October 13, 2015

v • e

Local ballot measures in California

Counties|

Alameda • Alpine • Amador • Butte • Calaveras • Colusa • Contra Costa • Del Norte • El Dorado • Fresno • Glenn • Humboldt • Imperial • Inyo • Kern • Kings • Lake • Lassen • Los Angeles • Madera • Marin • Mariposa • Mendocino • Merced • Modoc • Mono • Monterey • Napa • Nevada • Orange • Placer • Plumas • Riverside • Sacramento • San Benito • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Francisco • San Joaquin • San Luis Obispo • San Mateo • Santa Barbara • Santa Clara • Santa Cruz • Shasta • Sierra • Siskiyou • Solano • Sonoma • Stanislaus • Sutter • Tehama • Trinity • Tulare • Tuolumne • Ventura • Yolo • Yuba

* * *

Analysis|

Laws governing local ballot measures in California • Ballot measure information on California county websites • Costs of administering local elections • Required approval rates for local California ballot measures

* * *

Political topics|

Advisory votes • Binding arbitration • Business taxes • City charters • Election and voting laws • Gambling • Gann overrides • Hotel taxes • Incorporations • Immigration • Jurisdictional boundaries • Labor • Marijuana • Marijuana taxes • Mottos • Municipal bonds • Parcel taxes • Pensions • Project-Labor Agreements • Recall • Red light cameras • Rent control • Salaries of local officials • Sales taxes • School bonds • Term limits • Utility user taxes • Vehicle registration taxes • Zoning and land use

* * *

Tax measures|

Business taxes • Hotel taxes • Marijuana taxes • Oil and gas • Parcel taxes • Real estate transfer taxes • Sales taxes • Utility user taxes • Vehicle registration taxes

v • e

Local taxes on the ballot in California

Business taxes • Hotel taxes • Marijuana taxes • Oil and gas • Parcel taxes • Real estate transfer taxes • Sales taxes • Utility user taxes • Vehicle registration taxes