South Dakota Repeal Provisions Related to Corporations, Amendment H (2008)

## Contents

* 1 Election results
* 2 Text of measure
* 3 Support
* 4 Opposition
* 5 See also
* 6 External links
* 7 Additional reading
* 8 Footnotes

|  | Voting on
Business Regulation

Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
| Local

Local business regulation
Fireworks
Local GMO
Rent control

South Dakota Constitution

Articles
I • II • III • IV • V • VI • VII • VIII • IX • X • XI • XII • XIII • XIV • XV • XVI • XVII • XVIII • XIX • XX • XXI • XXII • XXIII • XXIV • XXV • XXVI • XXVII • XXVIII • XXIX • XXX

The South Dakota Repeal Provisions Related to Corporations Amendment, also known as Amendment H, was on the November 4, 2008 ballot in South Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, where it was defeated. The measure was referred to the ballot by the South Dakota Legislature acting on House Joint Resolution 1001 (HJR 1001). It was a proposed amendment to Article XVII of the South Dakota Constitution.

The measure, if it had passed, would have repealed provisions of the South Dakota Constitution relating to corporations.

The Constitution limited “corporations” to business entities with powers or privileges not possessed by individuals or partnerships. The Constitution also required the payment of money, property or labor for issuance of corporate stock and bonds; prohibited the increase of corporate stock and debt without consent of stockholders holding a larger value of stock first obtained; and protected cumulative voting rights of stockholders.

Constitutional Amendment H would have repealed the above provisions and permitted a 2008 Legislative Session bill (HB 1139) to become law. The new law would have allowed a corporation to restrict cumulative voting and to issue corporate stock for any consideration determined to be adequate by its board of directors."[1][2]

## Election results[edit]

See also 2008 ballot measure election results

South Dakota Amendment H (2008)

Result| Votes| Percentage
d No| 229,985| 69.03%
Yes|  103,172|  30.97%

Election results via: South Dakota Political Almanac, South Dakota Constitutional Amendments, Initiatives and Referendums 1970-2010

## Text of measure[edit]

The text of the measure can be read here.

## Support[edit]

Representative Mark Feinstein, a Democrat from Sioux Falls, and Patrick Goetinger of Rapid City, co-chairs of the Business Law Committee of the State Bar of South Dakota wrote the "pro" arguments for the measure for the state Ballot Question Pamphlet:

* The current language of the Constitution deters economic development. This update would help South Dakota remain competitive.
* Amendment H eliminates a constitutional provision preventing corporations from issuing stock as a form of payment, giving corporations greater leeway.[3]

## Opposition[edit]

No writer for the opposing viewpoint could be found by the Secretary of State.[3]

## See also[edit]

| Suggest a link

|

* South Dakota 2008 ballot measures
* 2008 ballot measures
* List of South Dakota ballot measures
* History of Initiative & Referendum in South Dakota

## External links[edit]

* South Dakota Political Almanac, South Dakota Constitutional Amendments, Initiatives and Referendums 1970-2010
* South Dakota Secretary of State: 2008 Ballot Question Text

## Additional reading[edit]

* Voters need to pass Amendment G to get legislative travel up to date, Dakota Voice, September 22, 2008
* Voters Will Decide Seven Issues, Marshall County Journal, October 1, 2008

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ South Dakota Political Almanac, "South Dakota Constitutional Amendments, Initiatives and Referendums 1970-2010," accessed August 27, 2014
2. ↑ South Dakota Secretary of State, "Historical Election Data," accessed August 27, 2014
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 South Dakota Secretary of State, "2008 South Dakota Ballot Question pamphlet," accessed August 27, 2014

v • e

2008 ballot measures

• Alabama 2008 ballot measures • Alaska 2008 ballot measures • Arizona 2008 ballot measures • Arkansas 2008 ballot measures • California 2008 ballot propositions • Colorado 2008 ballot measures • Connecticut 2008 ballot measures • Delaware 2008 ballot measures • Florida 2008 ballot measures • Georgia 2008 ballot measures • Hawaii 2008 ballot measures • Idaho 2008 ballot measures • Illinois 2008 ballot measures • Iowa 2008 ballot measures • Louisiana 2008 ballot measures • Maine 2008 ballot measures • Maryland 2008 ballot measures • Massachusetts 2008 ballot measures • Michigan 2008 ballot measures • Minnesota 2008 ballot measures • Missouri 2008 ballot measures • Montana 2008 ballot measures • Nebraska 2008 ballot measures • Nevada 2008 ballot measures • New Hampshire 2008 ballot measures • New Jersey 2008 ballot measures • New Mexico 2008 ballot measures • New York 2008 ballot measures • North Dakota 2008 ballot measures • Ohio 2008 ballot measures • Oklahoma 2008 ballot measures • Oregon 2008 ballot measures • Pennsylvania 2008 ballot measures • Rhode Island 2008 ballot measures • South Carolina 2008 ballot measures • South Dakota 2008 ballot measures • Utah 2008 ballot measures • Washington 2008 ballot measures • Wisconsin 2008 ballot measures • Wyoming 2008 ballot measures •

v • e

State of South Dakota
Pierre (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy

* * *

This historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.