Bharatiya Janata Party

Short description: Indian political party

Template:Infobox Indian political party

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP; [bʱaːɾətiːjə dʒənətaː paːrtiː] (Audio file "Hindi-Bharatiya Janata Party.ogg " not found); ) is a political party in India and one of the two major Indian political parties alongside the Indian National Congress.[1] Since 2014, it has been the ruling political party in India under the incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi.[2] The BJP is aligned with right-wing politics and has close ideological and organisational links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) volunteer paramilitary organisation.[3] Its policies adhere to Hindutva, a Hindu nationalist ideology.[4][5] As of December 2023[update], it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the Parliament of India as well as state legislatures.

The party's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, which was founded in 1951 by Indian politician Shyama Prasad Mukherjee.[6] After the Emergency of 1975–1977, the Jana Sangh merged with several other political parties to form the Janata Party; it defeated the then-incumbent Indian National Congress in the 1977 general election. After three years in power, the Janata Party dissolved in 1980, with the members of the erstwhile Jana Sangh reconvening to form the modern-day BJP. Although initially unsuccessful—winning only two seats in the 1984 general election, it grew in strength on the back of the movement around Ram Janmabhoomi in Uttar Pradesh. Following victories in several state elections and better performances in national elections, the BJP became the largest political party in the Parliament in 1996; however, it lacked a majority in the lower house of Parliament, and its government, under its then-leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee, lasted for only 13 days.[7]

After the 1998 general election, the BJP-led coalition known as the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) under prime minister Vajpayee formed a government that lasted for a year. Following fresh elections, the NDA government—again headed by Vajpayee—lasted for a full term in office; this was the first non-Congress government to do so. In the 2004 general election, the NDA suffered an unexpected defeat, and for the next ten years, the BJP was the principal opposition party. Narendra Modi, then the chief minister of Gujarat, led the party to a landslide victory in the 2014 general election. Modi has since led the NDA government as Indian prime minister, including being re-elected in the 2019 general election. As of December 2023[update], the alliance governs 17 Indian states and union territories.

The official ideology of the BJP is integral humanism, first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965. The party advocates social conservatism and a foreign policy centred on nationalist principles. During its first period in national government, the BJP avoided its Hindu nationalist priorities, and focused on a largely liberal economic policy that prioritised globalisation and economic growth over social welfare.[8] Since returning to government in 2014, the BJP government has enacted several priorities of the RSS, including criminalising the practice of triple talaq, and revoking Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir, and also abrogating its statehood.[9] India has experienced nationwide democratic backsliding under the BJP's rule since 2014.[10][11]

## Contents

* 1 History
* 1.1 Predecessors
* 1.1.1 Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77)
* 1.1.2 Janata Party (1977–80)
* 1.2 BJP (1980–present)
* 1.2.1 Formation and early days
* 1.2.2 Ram Janmabhoomi movement
* 1.2.3 Vajpayee era (1998, 1999–2004)
* 1.2.4 2002 Gujarat violence
* 1.2.5 In opposition (2004–2014)
* 1.2.6 Modi era (2014–present)
* 2 Ideology and political positions
* 2.1 Social policies and Hindutva
* 2.2 Economic policies
* 2.3 Defence and counterterrorism
* 2.4 Foreign policy
* 3 Organisation and structure
* 4 Electoral performance
* 4.1 Lok Sabha seats
* 5 Legislative presence
* 6 List of heads of government
* 6.1 List of prime ministers
* 6.2 List of incumbent chief ministers
* 7 See also
* 8 References
* 8.1 Explanatory notes
* 8.2 Citations
* 8.3 General and cited sources
* 9 Further reading
* 10 External links

## History

### Predecessors

#### Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1951–77)

Influential figures

Syama Prasad Mookerjee, founder of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh

Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the first BJP prime minister (1998–2004)

Lal Krishna Advani, deputy Prime Minister under Vajpayee and one of the architects of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement

The BJP's origins lie in the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, popularly known as the Jana Sangh, founded by Syama Prasad Mukherjee in 1951 in response to the politics of the dominant Congress party. It was founded in collaboration with the Hindu nationalist volunteer organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), and was widely regarded as the political arm of the RSS.[12] The Jana Sangh's aims included the protection of India's "Hindu" cultural identity, in addition to countering what it perceived to be the appeasement of Muslim people and the country of Pakistan by the Congress party and then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. The RSS loaned several of its leading pracharaks, or full-time workers, to the Jana Sangh to get the new party off the ground. Prominent among these was Deendayal Upadhyaya, who was appointed General Secretary. The Jana Sangh won only three Lok Sabha seats in the first general elections in 1952. It maintained a minor presence in parliament until 1967.[13][14]

The Jana Sangh's first major campaign, begun in early 1953, centred on a demand for the complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India.[15] Mukherjee was arrested in May 1953 for violating orders from the state government restraining him from entering Kashmir. He died of a heart attack the following month, while still in jail.[15] Mauli Chandra Sharma was elected to succeed Mukherjee; however, he was forced out of power by the RSS activists within the party, and the leadership went instead to Upadhyaya. Upadhyay remained the General Secretary until 1967, and worked to build a committed grassroots organisation in the image of the RSS. The party minimised engagement with the public, focusing instead on building its network of propagandists. Upadhyaya also articulated the philosophy of integral humanism, which formed the official doctrine of the party.[16] Younger leaders, such as Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Lal Krishna Advani also became involved with the leadership in this period, with Vajpayee succeeding Upadhyaya as president in 1968. The major themes on the party's agenda during this period were legislating a uniform civil code, banning cow slaughter and abolishing the special status given to Jammu and Kashmir.[17]

After assembly elections across the country in 1967, the party entered into a coalition with several other parties, including the Swatantra Party and the socialists. It formed governments in various states across the Hindi heartland, including Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. It was the first time the Jana Sangh held political office, albeit within a coalition; this caused the shelving of the Jana Sangh's more radical agenda.[18]

#### Janata Party (1977–80)

In 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed a state of emergency. The Jana Sangh took part in the widespread protests, with thousands of its members being imprisoned along with other agitators across the country. In 1977, the emergency was withdrawn and general elections were held. The Jana Sangh merged with parties from across the political spectrum, including the Socialist Party, the Congress (O) and the Bharatiya Lok Dal to form the Janata Party, with its main agenda being defeating Indira Gandhi.[14] The Janata Party won a majority in 1977 and formed a government with Morarji Desai as Prime Minister. The former Jana Sangh contributed the largest tally to the Janata Party's parliamentary contingent, with 93 seats or 31% of its strength. Vajpayee, previously the leader of the Jana Sangh, was appointed the Minister of External Affairs.[19]

The national leadership of the former Jana Sangh consciously renounced its identity, and attempted to integrate with the political culture of the Janata Party, based on Gandhian and Hindu traditionalist principles. Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot wrote that this proved to be impossible assimilation.[20] The state and local levels of the Jana Sangh remained relatively unchanged, retaining a strong association with the RSS, which did not sit well with the moderate centre-right constituents of the Party.[21] Violence between Hindus and Muslims increased sharply during the years that the Janata Party formed the government, with former Jana Sangha members being implicated in the riots in Aligarh and Jamshedpur in 1978–79. The other major constituents of the Janata Party demanded that the Jana Sangh should break from the RSS, which the Jana Sangh refused to do. Eventually, a fragment of the Janata Party broke off to form the Janata Party (Secular). The Morarji Desai government was reduced to a minority in the Parliament, forcing its resignation. Following a brief period of coalition rule, general elections were held in 1980, in which the Janata Party fared poorly, winning only 31 seats. In April 1980, shortly after the elections, the National Executive Council of the Janata Party banned its members from being 'dual members' of party and the RSS. In response, the former Jana Sangh members left to create a new political party, known as the Bharatiya Janata Party.[22][19]

### BJP (1980–present)

#### Formation and early days

Although the newly formed BJP was technically distinct from the Jana Sangh, the bulk of its rank and file were identical to its predecessor, with Vajpayee being its first president.[23] Historian Ramachandra Guha writes that the early 1980s were marked by a wave of violence between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP initially moderated the Hindu nationalist stance of its predecessor the Jana Sangh to gain a wider appeal, emphasising its links to the Janata Party and the ideology of Gandhian Socialism.[24] This was unsuccessful, as it won only two Lok Sabha seats in the elections of 1984.[24] The assassination of Indira Gandhi a few months earlier resulted in a wave of support for the Congress which won a record tally of 403 seats, contributing to the low number for the BJP.[25]

#### Ram Janmabhoomi movement

Ram Rath Yatra

The failure of Vajpayee's moderate strategy led to a shift in the ideology of the party toward a policy of more hardline Hindu nationalism.[24][26] In 1984, Advani was appointed president of the party, and under him it became the political voice of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement. In the early 1980s, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) began a campaign for the construction of a temple dedicated to the Hindu deity Rama at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya. The mosque had been constructed by the Mughal Emperor Babur in 1527. There is a dispute about whether a temple once stood there.[27] The agitation was on the basis of the belief that the site is the birthplace of Rama, and that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque.[28] The BJP threw its support behind this campaign and made it a part of their election platform. It won 86 Lok Sabha seats in 1989, a tally which made its support crucial to the National Front government of V. P. Singh.[29]

In September 1990, Advani began a rath yatra (chariot journey) to Ayodhya in support of the Ram temple movement. According to Guha, the imagery employed by the yatra was "religious, allusive, militant, masculine, and anti-Muslim".[30] Advani was placed under preventive detention on the orders of the then Bihar chief minister Lalu Prasad Yadav. A large number of kar sevaks (religious volunteers) nonetheless converged at Ayodhya, and some attacked the mosque. Three days of fighting with the paramilitary forces ended with the deaths of several kar sevaks. Hindus were urged by VHP to "take revenge" for these deaths, resulting in riots against Muslims across Uttar Pradesh. [31] The BJP withdrew its support from the V.P. Singh government, leading to fresh general elections. The BJP further increased its tally to 120 seats, and won a majority in the Uttar Pradesh assembly.[32]

On 6 December 1992, the RSS and its affiliates organised a rally involving more than 100,000 VHP and BJP activists at the site of the mosque.[32] The rally developed into a frenzied attack that ended with the demolition of the mosque.[32] Over the following weeks, waves of violence between Hindus and Muslims erupted all over the country, killing over 2,000 people.[32] The government briefly banned the VHP, and many BJP leaders, including Advani were arrested for making inflammatory speeches provoking the demolition.[33][34] Several historians have said that the demolition was the product of a conspiracy by the Sangh Parivar, and not a spontaneous act.[32] In the parliamentary elections in 1996, the BJP capitalised on the communal polarisation that followed the demolition to win 161 Lok Sabha seats, making it the largest party in parliament.[7] Vajpayee was sworn in as Prime Minister but was unable to attain a majority in the Lok Sabha, forcing the government to resign after 13 days.[7]

A 2009 report, authored by Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, found that 68 people were responsible for the demolition, mostly leaders from the BJP.[34] Among those named were Vajpayee, Advani, and Murli Manohar Joshi. The report also criticised Kalyan Singh, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh during the demolition.[34] He was accused of posting bureaucrats and police officers who would stay silent during the demolition.[34] In 2020, the Supreme Court of India acquitted all of the accused in the demolition including Advani and Joshi.[35]

#### Vajpayee era (1998, 1999–2004)

A coalition of regional parties formed the government in 1996, but this grouping was short-lived, and mid-term polls were held in 1998. The BJP contested the elections leading a coalition called the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which contained its existing allies like the Samata Party, the Shiromani Akali Dal, the Shiv Sena in addition to the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the Biju Janata Dal. Among these regional parties, the Shiv Sena was the only one that had an ideology similar to the BJP; Amartya Sen, for example, called the coalition an "ad hoc" grouping.[36] The NDA had a majority with outside support from the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Vajpayee returned as Prime Minister.[37] However, the coalition ruptured in May 1999 when the leader of AIADMK, J. Jayalalitha, withdrew her support, and fresh elections were held again.[38]

On 13 October 1999, without the AIADMK, the NDA won 303 seats in parliament and thus an outright majority. The BJP had its highest-ever tally of 183. Vajpayee became Prime Minister for the third time; Advani became Deputy Prime Minister[lower-alpha 1] and Home Minister. This NDA government lasted its full term of five years. Its policy agenda included a more aggressive stance on defence and terror and neo-liberal economic policies.[8] In 2001, Bangaru Laxman, then the BJP president, was filmed accepting a bribe in a sting operation.[39][40] He was compelled to resign and was subsequently prosecuted, eventually being sentenced to four years in prison.[41]

#### 2002 Gujarat violence

On 27 February 2002, a train carrying Hindu pilgrims was burned outside the town of Godhra, killing 59 people. The incident was seen as an attack upon Hindus, and sparked off massive anti-Muslim violence across the state of Gujarat that lasted several weeks.[42] The death toll estimated was as high as 2000, while 150,000 were displaced.[43] Rape, mutilation, and torture were also widespread.[43][44] The then-Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and several high-ranking government officials were accused of initiating and condoning the violence, as were police officers who allegedly directed the rioters and gave them lists of Muslim-owned properties.[45] In April 2009, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate and expedite the Gujarat riots cases. In 2012, Modi was cleared of complicity in the violence by the SIT. BJP MLA Maya Kodnani, who later held a cabinet portfolio in the Modi government, was convicted of having orchestrated one of the riots and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment;[46][47] she was later acquitted by the Gujarat High Court.[48] Scholars such as Paul Brass, Martha Nussbaum and Dipankar Gupta have said that there was a high level of state complicity in the incidents.[49][50][51]

#### In opposition (2004–2014)

Vajpayee called for early elections in 2004, six months ahead of schedule. The NDA's campaign was based on the slogan "India Shining", which sought to depict it as responsible for a rapid economic transformation of the country.[52] However, the NDA unexpectedly suffered a heavy defeat, winning only 186 seats in the Lok Sabha, compared to the 222 of the Congress and its allies. Manmohan Singh succeeded Vajpayee as Prime Minister as the head of the United Progressive Alliance. The NDA's failure to reach out to rural Indians was provided as an explanation for its defeat, as was its divisive policy agenda.[52][53]

In May 2008, the BJP won the state elections in Karnataka. This was the first time that the party won assembly elections in any South Indian state. In the 2009 general elections, its strength in the Lok Sabha was reduced to 116 seats. It lost the Karnataka assembly election in 2013.[54]

#### Modi era (2014–present)

Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India since 2014

Amit Shah has been the longest (continuous) serving National President of the BJP

In the 2014 Indian general election, the BJP won 282 seats, leading the NDA to a tally of 336 seats in the 543-seat Lok Sabha.[55] Narendra Modi was sworn in as the 14th Prime Minister of India on 26 May 2014.[56][57] The vote share of the BJP was 31% of all votes cast, a low figure relative to the number of seats it won.[58] This was the first instance since 1984 of a single party achieving an outright majority in the Indian Parliament[59] and the first time that it achieved a majority in the Lok Sabha on its own strength. Support was concentrated in the Hindi-speaking belt in North-central India.[58] The magnitude of the victory was not predicted by most opinion and exit polls.[58]

Political analysts have suggested several reasons for this victory, including the popularity of Modi, and the loss of support for the Congress due to the corruption scandals in its previous term.[60] The BJP was also able to expand its traditionally upper-caste, upper-class support base and received significant support from middle-class and Dalit people, as well as among Other Backward Classes.[61][58] Its support among Muslims remained low; only 8% of Muslim voters voted for the BJP.[61][58] The BJP was also very successful at mobilizing its supporters and raising voter turnout among them.[58]

In 2019, the BJP won the general election with a renewed majority. Soon after returning to power, on 5 August 2019, the Modi administration revoked the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state. This state consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of a dispute among India, Pakistan , and China since 1947.[62][63]

Later in 2019, the Modi administration introduced the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, which was passed by the Parliament of India on 11 December 2019. It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing a path to Indian citizenship for illegal immigrants of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian religion, who had fled persecution from Pakistan , Bangladesh and Afghanistan before December 2014.[64][65] Muslims from those countries were not given such eligibility.[66] The act was the first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law.[66][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 4] A report by the V-Dem Institute described India as experiencing democratic backsliding due to the Modi era,[10][11] which is considered the most notable challenge to India's democracy since the authoritarian Emergency years of 1975–77.[67][68]

## Ideology and political positions

### Social policies and Hindutva

Further information: Religion:Hindutva

The official philosophy of the BJP is "Integral humanism," a philosophy first formulated by Deendayal Upadhyaya in 1965, who described it as advocating an "indigenous economic model that puts the human being at center stage."[69][70] It is committed to Hindutva, an ideology articulated by Indian independence activist Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. According to the party, Hindutva is cultural nationalism favouring Indian culture over westernisation, thus it extends to all Indians regardless of religion.[24] Scholars and political analysts describe Hindutva as seeking to redefine India and recast it as a Hindu country to the exclusion of other religions, making the BJP a Hindu nationalist party in a general sense.[32][24][71][72] The BJP moderated its stance after the NDA was formed in 1998, due to the presence of parties with a broader set of ideologies.[32][8]

The BJP's Hindutva ideology has been reflected in many of its government policies. It supports the construction of the Ram Mandir temple at the disputed site of the Babri Mosque.[71] This issue was its major poll plank in the 1991 general elections.[71] However, the demolition of the mosque during a BJP rally in 1992 resulted in a backlash against it, leading to a decline of the temple's prominence in its agenda.[71] The education policy of the NDA government reorganised the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) and tasked it with extensively revising the textbooks used in Indian schools.[73] Various scholars have stated that this revision, especially in the case of history textbooks, was a covert attempt to "saffronise" Indian history.[73][74][75][76] The NDA government introduced Vedic astrology as a subject in college curricula, despite opposition from several leading scientists.[77]

Links between the BJP and the RSS grew stronger under the Modi administration. The RSS provided organisational support to the BJP's electoral campaigns, while the Modi administration appointed a number of individuals affiliated with the RSS to prominent government positions.[78] In 2014, Yellapragada Sudershan Rao, who had previously been associated with the RSS, became the chairperson of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR).[79] Historians and former members of the ICHR, including those sympathetic to the BJP, questioned his credentials as a historian, and stated that the appointment was part of an agenda of cultural nationalism.[79][80][81] Over its first term the Modi administration appointed other RSS members to lead universities and research institutions, and recruitment of faculty members favoring the RSS increased. Scholars Nandini Sundar and Kiran Bhatty write that many of these appointees did not possess the qualifications for their positions.[9] The Modi administration also made numerous changes in government-approved history textbooks. These changes de-emphasizing the role of Jawaharlal Nehru, and glorifying that of Modi himself, while also portraying Indian society as harmonious, without conflict or inequity.[9][82]

The BJP supports a uniform civil code, which would apply a common set of personal laws to every citizen regardless of their personal religion, replacing the existing laws which vary by religious community. Historian Yogendra Malik writes that this ignores the differential procedures required to protect the cultural identity of the Muslim minority.[24][71] The BJP favoured, and in 2019 enacted,[83][84][85] the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which granted a greater degree of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir in recognition of the unusual circumstances surrounding its accession to the Indian Union.[24] It simultaneously abrogated Jammu and Kashmir statehood, reorganizing it into two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.[9]

The BJP opposes illegal immigration into India from Bangladesh.[72] The party states that this migration, mostly in the states of Assam and West Bengal, threatens the security, economy and stability of the country.[72] Academics have pointed out that the BJP refers to Hindu migrants from Bangladesh as refugees, and reserves the term "illegal" for Muslim migrants.[72] Academic Michael Gillan perceived it as an attempt to use an emotive issue to mobilise Hindu sentiment in a region where the party has not been historically successful.[72][86] The party later became the party of government in Assam.[87] The Modi administration passed a citizenship law in 2019 which provided a pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who are Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians.[64][65] The law does not grant such eligibility to Muslims.[88][89][66] This was first time religion had been overtly used as a criterion for citizenship under Indian law: it attracted global criticism, and sparked widespread protests that were halted by the COVID-19 pandemic.[9][66][lower-alpha 5] Counter-demonstrations against the protests developed into the 2020 Delhi riots, caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.[90][91] Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslim.[92][93][94][95][96]

In 2013, the Supreme Court of India reinstated the controversial Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which, among other things, criminalises homosexuality. There was a popular outcry, although clerics, including Muslim religious leaders, stated that they supported the verdict.[97][98] BJP president Rajnath Singh said that the party supported Section 377, because it believed that homosexuality was unnatural,[99] though the party softened the stance after its victory in the 2014 general elections.[100] The Modi government is opposed to same-sex marriage, stating in a legal affidavit that legalizing it would cause "complete havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country" and that it was "not comparable with Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife & children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as ‘husband’, a biological woman as ‘wife’ and children born out of union".[101]

### Economic policies

The BJP's economic policy has changed considerably since its founding. There is a significant range of economic ideologies within the party. In the 1980s, like the Jana Sangh, it reflected the thinking of the RSS and its affiliates. It supported swadeshi (the promotion of indigenous industries and products) and a protectionist export policy. However, it supported internal economic liberalisation, and opposed the state-driven industrialisation favoured by the Congress.[102] During the 1996 elections, and later when it was in government, the BJP shifted its stance away from protectionism and towards globalisation. The tenure of the NDA saw an unprecedented influx of foreign companies in India.[102] This was criticised, including by the BJP's affiliates, the RSS and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch:[102] the RSS stated that the BJP was not being true to its swadeshi ideology.[102]

The two NDA governments in the period 1998–2004 introduced significant deregulation and privatisation of government-owned enterprises. It also introduced tariff-reducing measures. These reforms built off of the initial economic liberalisation introduced by the P. V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government in the early 1990s.[103] India's GDP growth increased substantially during the tenure of the NDA. The 2004 campaign slogan India Shining was based on the party's belief that the free market would bring prosperity to all sectors of society.[104] After its unexpected defeat, commentators said that it was punished for neglecting the needs of the poor and focusing too much on its corporate allies.[52][53][105]

This shift in the economic policies of the BJP was also visible in state governments, especially in Gujarat, where the BJP held power for 16 years.[106] Modi's government, in power from 2002 to 2014, followed a strongly neo-liberal agenda, presented as a drive towards development.[107][108] Its policies have included extensive privatisation of infrastructure and services, as well as a significant rollback of labour and environmental regulations. While this was praised by the business community, commentators criticised it as catering to the BJP's upper-class constituency instead of the poor.[107]

The economic policies of Modi's government focused on privatisation and liberalisation of the economy, based on a neoliberal framework.[109][110] Modi liberalised India's foreign direct investment policies, allowing more foreign investment in several industries, including in defence and the railways.[109][111][112] Other proposed reforms included making it harder for workers to form unions and easier for employers to hire and fire them;[110] some of these proposals were dropped after protests.[113] The reforms drew strong opposition from unions: on 2 September 2015, eleven of the country's largest unions went on strike, including one affiliated with the BJP.[110] The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, a constituent of the Sangh Parivar, stated that the underlying motivation of labour reforms favoured corporations over labourers.[109] Modi has been described as taking a more economically populist approach on healthcare and agricultural policy.[114] Modi's government has also been described as taking a more protectionist turn on international trade during his second term, withdrawing from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership talks[115][116] and introducing the 2020 Atmanirbhar Bharat economic plan, which emphasises national self-sufficiency.[117][118]

### Defence and counterterrorism

Compared to Congress, the BJP takes a more aggressive and nationalistic position on defence policy and terrorism.[119][120] The Vajpayee-led NDA government carried out nuclear weapons tests and enacted the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which later came under heavy criticism.[119][120] It also deployed troops to evict infiltrators from Kargil, and supported the United States War on Terror.[121]

Although previous Congress governments developed the capability for a nuclear weapons test, the Vajpayee government broke with India's historical strategy of avoiding it and authorised Pokhran-II, a series of five nuclear tests in 1998.[119] The tests came soon after Pakistan tested a medium-range ballistic missile. They were seen as an attempt to display India's military prowess to the world, and a reflection of anti-Pakistan sentiment within the BJP.[119]

The Vajpayee government ordered the Indian armed forces to expel the Pakistani soldiers occupying Kashmir territory, later known as the Kargil War.[122][123] Although the government was later criticised for the intelligence failures that did not detect Pakistani presence, it was successful in ousting them from the previously Indian-controlled territory.[122][123]

After the terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001, the NDA government passed the Prevention of Terrorism Act.[120] The aim of the act was to improve the government's ability to deal with terrorism.[120] It initially failed to pass in the Rajya Sabha; therefore, the NDA took the extraordinary step of convening a joint session of the Parliament, where the numerical superior Lok Sabha allowed the bill to pass.[120] The act was subsequently used to prosecute hundreds of people accused of terrorism.[120] However, it was criticised by opposition parties and scholars for being an infringement upon civil liberties, and the National Human Rights Commission of India stated that it had been used to target Muslims.[120] It was later repealed by the Congress-led UPA government in 2004.[124]

The Modi government has conducted several strikes on territory controlled by neighbouring countries on counterterrorism grounds. This included a 2015 Indian counter-insurgency operation in Myanmar against the National Socialist Council of Nagaland, the 2016 Indian Line of Control strike in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, and the 2019 Balakot airstrike in Pakistan.[125] It also militarily intervened in defence of Bhutan during the 2017 Doklam standoff with China.[126]

The Modi government considers national security to be one of their key focuses and has implemented many long-standing defence reforms.[127][128] In August 2019, the Modi government established the post of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) to ensure better coordination between all three services, a reform that was widely requested after the 1999 Kargil War.[129] The Department of Military Affairs was also established and put under the CDS.[130]

### Foreign policy

The historical stance of the BJP towards foreign policy, like the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, was based on an aggressive Hindu nationalism combined with economic protectionism.[131] The Bharatiya Jana Sangh was founded with the explicit aim of reversing the partition of India; as a result, its official position was that the existence of Pakistan was illegitimate.[131] This antagonism toward Pakistan remains a significant influence on the BJP's ideology.[131][132] During the Cold War, the party and its affiliates strongly opposed India's long standing policy of non-alignment, and instead advocated closeness to the United States.[131] In the post-Cold War era, the party has largely embraced the Indian foreign policy consensus of improving relations with the United States,[133] while stressing a desire for a more multipolar world order.[134]

The Vajpayee government's foreign policy in many ways represented a radical shift from BJP orthodoxy while maintaining some aspects of it.[102][132] Its policy also represented a significant change from the Nehruvian idealism of previous governments, opting instead for realism.[135] His party criticised him for adopting a much more moderate stance with Pakistan. In 1998, he made a landmark visit to Pakistan, and inaugurated the Delhi–Lahore Bus service.[131] Vajpayee signed the Lahore Declaration, which was an attempt to improve Indo-Pakistani relations that deteriorated after the 1998 nuclear tests.[131] However, the presence of Pakistani soldiers and militants in the disputed Kashmir territory was discovered a few months later, causing the 1999 Kargil War. The war ended a couple of months later, with the expulsion of the infiltrators two months later, without any shift in the Line of Control that marked the de facto border between the two countries.[131] Despite the war, Vajpayee continued to display a willingness to engage Pakistan in dialogue. This was not well received among the BJP cadre, who criticised the government for being "weak".[131] This faction of the BJP asserted itself at the post-Kargil Agra summit, preventing any significant deal from being reached. [131] The Vajpayee government strongly opposed the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, with Vajpayee describing it as a "dance of destruction".[136][137]

The Vajpayee administration also offered political support to the U.S. War on Terror, in the hope of better addressing India's issues with terrorism and insurgency in Kashmir. This led to closer defence ties with the US, including negotiations for the sale of weapons.[121] However, the BJP strongly condemned the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stating that it "deplores the unjustified military action resorted to by the United States, Britain and their allies against Iraq".[138] The BJP also opposed the 2011 military intervention in Libya and urged the Lok Sabha to pass a unanimous resolution condemning it.[139]

The Modi government initially took a pragmatic stance towards Pakistan, attempting to improve relations with Nawaz Sharif's government, culminating in Modi visiting Pakistan in 2015.[140] Relations subsequently deteriorated, particularly after Sharif was ousted in 2017.[141] The Modi government has since been described as taking a "hardline" approach on Pakistan, and the BJP has accused the opposition Congress of collaborating with Pakistan through its criticism of government policy.[142] In 2015, the Modi government was accused by the Nepalese government of imposing an undeclared blockade on Nepal.[143] The Modi government expressed concern following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, but maintained cordial relations with the military government, abstaining from a United Nations Security Council resolution regarding the situation there.[144][145] The Modi government remained neutral on the Russo-Ukrainian War,[146] abstaining from United Nations Security Council Resolution 2623, which condemned the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.[147] The leadership of the Indian National Congress backed the government's stance.[148]

## Organisation and structure

A diagram of the structure of the Bharatiya Janata Party

The organisation of the BJP is strictly hierarchical, with the president being the highest authority in the party.[70] Until 2012, the BJP constitution mandated that any qualified member could be national or state president for a single three-year term.[70] This was amended to a maximum of two consecutive terms.[149]

Below the president is the National Executive, which contains a variable number of senior leaders from across the country. It is the higher decision-making body of the party. Its members are several vice-presidents, general-secretaries, treasurers and secretaries, who work directly with the president.[70] An identical structure, with an executive committee led by a president, exists at the state, regional, district and local level.[70]

In April 2015, the BJP stated that it had more than 100 million registered members, which would make it the world's largest political party by primary membership.[150][151] As of September 2022[update], the party does not have a single Muslim representative in the parliament and state assemblies.[152][153]

The BJP is a cadre-based party. It has close connections with other organisations with similar ideologies, such as the RSS, ABVP, BYSS, VHP and other Sangh Parivar-related oragnisations. The cadres of these groups often supplement the BJP's. Its lower members are largely derived from the RSS and its affiliates, loosely known as the Sangh Parivar:[70]

* The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (All India Students' Union), the students' wing of the RSS[70]
* The Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (Indian Farmer's Union), the farmers' division[70]
* The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (Indian Labourers Union), the labour union associated with the RSS[70]

The party has subsidiary organisations of its own, such as:

* The BJP Mahila Morcha (BJP Women's Front), its women's division[70]
* The Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (Indian People's Youth Front), its youth wing[70]
* The BJP Minority Morcha (BJP Minority Front), its minority division[70]

In terms of members, BJP claims to have over 170 million members[154][155] as of October 2022, and it's considered to be among the world's largest political parties.[156]

## Electoral performance

The Bharatiya Janata Party was officially founded in 1980, and the first general election it contested was in 1984, in which it won only two Lok Sabha seats. Following the election in 1996, the BJP became the largest party in the Lok Sabha for the first time, but the government it formed was short-lived.[7] In the elections of 1998 and 1999, it remained the largest party, and headed the ruling coalition on both occasions.[8] In the 2014 general election, it won an outright majority in parliament. From 1991 onwards, a BJP member has led the Opposition whenever the party was not in power.[157][lower-alpha 6]

### Lok Sabha seats

Year  | Legislature  | Party leader  | Seats won  | Change in seats  | Percentage
of votes  | Vote swing  | Outcome  | Ref.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

1984  | 8th Lok Sabha  | Atal Bihari Vajpayee  |

2 / 543

|  2  | 7.74%  | –  | Opposition  | [158]
1989  | 9th Lok Sabha  | Lal Krishna Advani  |

85 / 543

|  83  | 11.36%  |  3.62%  | Outside support for NF  | [159]
1991  | 10th Lok Sabha  |

120 / 543

|  35  | 20.11%  |  8.75%  | Opposition  | [160]
1996  | 11th Lok Sabha  | Atal Bihari Vajpayee  |

161 / 543

|  41  | 20.29%  |  0.18%  | Government, later opposition  | [161]
1998  | 12th Lok Sabha  |

182 / 543

|  21  | 25.59%  |  5.30%  | Government  | [162]
1999  | 13th Lok Sabha  |

182 / 543

|  | 23.75%  |  1.84%  | Government  | [163]
2004  | 14th Lok Sabha  |

138 / 543

|  44  | 22.16%  |  1.69%  | Opposition  | [164]
2009  | 15th Lok Sabha  | Lal Krishna Advani  |

116 / 543

|  22  | 18.80%  |  3.36%  | Opposition  | [165]
2014  | 16th Lok Sabha  | Narendra Modi  |

282 / 543

|  166  | 31.34%  |  12.54%  | Government  | [166]
2019  | 17th Lok Sabha  |

303 / 543

|  21  | 37.46%  |  6.12%  | Government  | [167][168]

As of 11 January 2024[update], 12 states have Chief Ministers from the BJP, and governments led by that party, sometimes including allied parties. The 12 states are Arunachal Pradesh, Assam (with Asom Gana Parishad and United People's Party Liberal), Chhattisgarh, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana (with Jannayak Janta Party), Madhya Pradesh, Manipur (with Naga People's Front, Rajasthan, Tripura (with Indigenous People's Front of Tripura), Uttar Pradesh (with Apna Dal (Sonelal)) and Uttarakhand.

In 4 other states and in the union territory of Puducherry, it participates in the government as the junior partner in the ruling alliance with other members of the National Democratic Alliance. The states are: Maharashtra (with Shiv Sena, Nationalist Congress Party (AP), other small parties and independents), Meghalaya (with the National People's Party, United Democratic Party and Hill State People's Democratic Party), Nagaland (with the Nationalist Democratic Progressive Party), and Puducherry (with the All India N.R. Congress). The BJP's ally, the Sikkim Krantikari Morcha, holds power in Sikkim, but the BJP has no ministers in the government.

The BJP has previously held power in Karnataka, Delhi and Jharkhand, and has been the junior coalition partner in governments in Andhra Pradesh (with the Telugu Desam Party), Jammu and Kashmir (with the Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party), Odisha (with the Biju Janata Dal), Punjab (with the Shiromani Akali Dal), and Tamil Nadu (with the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam). It has never held power in Kerala, Telangana, and West Bengal.

In addition to the NDA, the BJP is also a part of a regional political alliance in Northeast India named the North-East Democratic Alliance.[169][170][171]

## Legislative presence

Lower House

Legislature  | Seats  | Legislative leader  | Status
Lok Sabha  |

303 / 543

| Narendra Modi  | Government
Andhra Pradesh  |

0 / 175

| No Representation
Arunachal Pradesh  |

48 / 60

| Pema Khandu  | Government
Assam  |

63 / 126

| Himanta Biswa Sarma  | Government
Bihar  |

78 / 243

| Samrat Choudhary  | Government
Chhattisgarh  |

54 / 90

| Vishnu Deo Sai  | Government
Delhi  |

8 / 70

| Ramvir Singh Bidhuri  | Opposition
Goa  |

28 / 40

| Pramod Sawant  | Government
Gujarat  |

156 / 182

| Bhupendrabhai Patel  | Government
Haryana  |

41 / 90

| Manohar Lal Khattar  | Government

Himachal Pradesh

25 / 68

| Jai Ram Thakur  | Opposition

Jammu and Kashmir†

0 / 90

| President Rule

Jharkhand

26 / 81

| Amar Kumar Bauri  | Opposition

Karnataka

66 / 224

| R. Ashoka  | Opposition

Kerala

0 / 140

| No Representation

Madhya Pradesh

163 / 230

| Mohan Yadav  | Government

Maharashtra

104 / 288

| Devendra Fadnavis  | Government

Manipur

37 / 60

| N. Biren Singh  | Government

Meghalaya

2 / 60

| Sanbor Shullai  | Government

Mizoram

2 / 40

|  | Others

Nagaland

12 / 60

| Y. Patton  | Government

Odisha

22 / 147

| Jayanarayan Mishra  | Opposition

Puducherry

9 / 30

| A. Namassivayam  | Government

Punjab

2 / 117

|  | Others

Rajasthan

115 / 200

| Bhajan Lal Sharma  | Government

Sikkim

12 / 32

| Narendra Kumar Subba  | Government

Tamil Nadu

4 / 234

| Nainar Nagendran  | Others

Telangana

8 / 119

| Katipally Venkata Ramana Reddy  | Others

Tripura

32 / 60

| Manik Saha  | Government

Uttar Pradesh

252 / 403

| Yogi Adityanath  | Government

Uttarakhand

47 / 70

| Pushkar Singh Dhami  | Government

West Bengal

68 / 294

| Suvendu Adhikari  | Opposition
Upper House
Rajya Sabha  |

93 / 245

| Piyush Goyal  | Government
Andhra Pradesh  |

0 / 58

| No Representation
Bihar  |

24 / 75

| Hari Sahni  | Government

Karnataka

34 / 75

| Kota Srinivas Poojary  | Opposition

Maharashtra

22 / 78

| Pravin Darekar  | Government

Telangana

1 / 40

| A.Venkata Narayana Reddy  | Others

Uttar Pradesh

82 / 100

| Keshav Prasad Maurya  | Government

## List of heads of government

### List of prime ministers

No.  | Portrait  | Prime minister  | Constituency  | Term in office  | Lok Sabha  | Cabinet

|
|
|
|
|
|

Start  | End  | Tenure
1  |  | Atal Bihari Vajpayee  | Lucknow  | 16 May 1996  | 1 June 1996  | 16 days  | 11th  | Vajpayee I
19 March 1998  | 22 May 2004  | 6 years, 64 days  | 12th  | Vajpayee II
13th  | Vajpayee III
2  |  | Narendra Modi  | Varanasi  | 26 May 2014  | Incumbent | 12 years, 80 days  | 16th  | Modi I
17th  | Modi II

### List of incumbent chief ministers

As of 11 January 2024[update], 52 people from Bharatiya Janata Party have held the position of a chief minister, 12 of whom are incumbent.

Incumbent Chief Ministers from the BJP  No.  | State  | Portrait  | Name  | Cabinet  | Governing coalition

|
|
|
|
|

1  | Arunachal Pradesh  |  | Pema Khandu  | Khandu IV  | BJP
NPP
2  | Assam  |  | Himanta Biswa Sarma  | Sarma  | BJP
AGP
UPPL
3  | Chhattisgarh  |  | Vishnudeo Sai  | Sai  | BJP
4  | Goa  |  | Pramod Sawant  | Sawant II  | BJP
MGP
| IND
5  | Gujarat  |  | Bhupendrabhai Patel  | Patel II  | BJP
6  | Haryana  |  | Manohar Lal Khattar  | Khattar II  | BJP
JJP
HLP
| IND
7  | Madhya Pradesh  |  | Mohan Yadav  | Yadav  | BJP
8  | Manipur  |  | N. Biren Singh  | Singh II  | BJP
| NPP
| NPF
| IND
9  | Rajasthan  |  | Bhajan Lal Sharma  | Sharma  | BJP
10  | Tripura  |  | Manik Saha  | Saha II  | BJP
| IPFT
11  | Uttar Pradesh  |  | Yogi Adityanath  | Adityanath II  | BJP
| AD(S)
| NP
12  | Uttarakhand  |  | Pushkar Singh Dhami  | Dhami II  | BJP

## See also

* Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Parliament of India
* List of political parties in India
* List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party
* List of state presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party
* Organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party
* Politics of India
* List of ruling political parties by country

## References

### Explanatory notes

1. ↑ in 2002
2. ↑ Sharma (2019), p. 523: "First, citizenship status biased towards religious identity is by no means a new idea.... A careful study of the policies and laws related to citizenship, adopted since independence, substantiates the assertion that citizenship in India has always been based on an implicit belief that India is for Hindus."
3. ↑ Sen (2018), pp. 10–11: "Nehru's response [to Patel's warning] made it clear that Muslim migrants from Pakistan could not join the ranks of refugees in India... Thus, despite broad public statements promising citizenship to all displaced persons from Pakistan, Hindu migrants alone counted as citizen-refugees in post-partition India."
4. ↑ Jayal (2019), pp. 34–35: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
5. ↑ Jayal (2019), pp. 33–50: "While some elements of religious difference had... been covertly smuggled in earlier, this bill seeks to do so overtly."
6. ↑ For the electoral results of the BJP's predecessors, see the JP and BJS articles.

### Citations

1. ↑ "In Numbers: The Rise of BJP and decline of Congress". The Times of India. 19 May 2016. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-In-Numbers-The-Rise-of-BJP-and-decline-of-Congress/articleshow/52341190.cms.
2. ↑ "Lok Sabha Election results 2019: EC declares results of all 542 seats, BJP wins 303". Zee News. 25 May 2019. https://zeenews.india.com/india/live-updates/lok-sabha-election-results-2019-live-updates-bjp-narendra-modi-nda-2205806.
3. ↑ "Men, machinery and mind of RSS behind BJP's poll power punch". Business Standard. 17 March 2019. https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/men-machinery-and-mind-of-rss-behind-bjp-s-poll-power-punch-119031700304_1.html.
4. ↑ Banerjee 2005, p. 3118.
5. ↑ Malik & Singh 1992, p. 318.
6. ↑ Swain 2001, p. 60.
7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Guha 2007, p. 633.
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Sen 2005, pp. 251–272.
9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 Bhatty, Kiran; Sundar, Nandini (17 September 2020). "Sliding from majoritarianism toward fascism: Educating India under the Modi regime". International Sociology (SAGE Publications) 35 (6): 632–650. doi:10.1177/0268580920937226. ISSN 0268-5809.
10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Hindle, Garry; Lindberg, Staffan (2020). "New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party". V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdf.
11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Nazifa Alizada, Rowan Cole, Lisa Gastaldi, Sandra Grahn, Sebastian Hellmeier, Palina Kolvani, Jean Lachapelle, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Shreeya Pillai, and Staffan I. Lindberg. 2021. Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/74/8c/748c68ad-f224-4cd7-87f9-8794add5c60f/dr_2021_updated.pdf
12. ↑ Noorani 1978, p. 216.
13. ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 116–119.
14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Guha 2007, p. 136.
15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Guha 2007, p. 250.
16. ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 122–126, 129–130.
17. ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 250, 352, 413.
18. ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 427–428.
19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Guha 2007, pp. 538–540.
20. ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 282–283.
21. ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 292–301, 312.
22. ↑ Jaffrelot 1996, pp. 301–312.
23. ↑ "Forty years ago, April 7, 1980: BJP is born" (in en). 7 April 2020. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/forty-years-ago-april-7-1980-bjp-is-born-6350456/.
24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 24.6 Malik & Singh 1992, pp. 318–336.
25. ↑ Guha 2007, p. 579.
26. ↑ Pai 1996, pp. 1170–1183.
27. ↑ Jha 2003.
28. ↑ Flint 2005, p. 165.
29. ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 582–598.
30. ↑ Guha 2007, p. 635.
31. ↑ Guha 2007, p. 636.
32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 32.4 32.5 32.6 Guha 2007, pp. 633–659.
33. ↑ NDTV 2012.
34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 Al Jazeera 2009.
35. ↑ "All acquitted in Babri Masjid demolition case | Advani, MM Joshi hail verdict, Congress wants govt to appeal against it" (in en-IN). The Hindu. 30 September 2020. ISSN 0971-751X. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ayodhya-babri-masjid-demolition-case-verdict/article32728552.ece.
36. ↑ Sen 2005, p. 254.
37. ↑ rediff.com 1998.
38. ↑ Outlook 2013.
39. ↑ Kattakayam 2012.
40. ↑ India Today 2001.
41. ↑ Tehelka 2001.
42. ↑ Ghassem-Fachandi 2012, pp. 1–31.
43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Jaffrelot 2013, p. 16.
44. ↑ Harris 2012.
45. ↑ Krishnan 2012.
46. ↑ Hindustan Times 2014.
47. ↑ NDTV.com 2012.
48. ↑ "Naroda Patiya verdict: Gujarat HC acquits Maya Kodnani, commutes Babu Bajrangi's sentence". India Today. 20 April 2018. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/naroda-patiya-case-gujarat-hc-acquits-maya-kodnani-upholds-babu-bajrangi-s-conviction-1216228-2018-04-20.
49. ↑ Brass 2005, pp. 385–393.
50. ↑ Gupta 2011, p. 252.
51. ↑ Nussbaum 2008, p. 2.
52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 52.2 Ramesh 2004.
53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 The Hindu 2004.
54. ↑ Hindustan Times 2009.
55. ↑ Mathew 2014.
56. ↑ Deccan Chronicle 2014.
57. ↑ BBC & May 2014.
58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 58.2 58.3 58.4 58.5 Sridharan 2014.
59. ↑ Times of India 2014.
60. ↑ Diwakar 2014.
61. ↑ 61.0 61.1 Varshney 2014.
62. ↑ Akhtar, Rais; Kirk, William. "Jammu and Kashmir, State, India". Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/Jammu-and-Kashmir. Retrieved 7 August 2019. "Jammu and Kashmir, state of India, located in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent in the vicinity of the Karakoram and westernmost Himalayan mountain ranges. The state is part of the larger region of Kashmir, which has been the subject of dispute between India, Pakistan, and China since the partition of the subcontinent in 1947.".
63. ↑ Osmańczyk, Edmund Jan (2003). "Jammu and Kashmir.". in Mango, Anthony. Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements. 2: G–M (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 1189. ISBN 978-0-415-93922-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=fSIMXHMdfkkC&pg=PA1189. Retrieved 16 June 2020. "Territory in northwestern India, subject of a dispute between India and Pakistan. It has borders with Pakistan and China."
64. ↑ 64.0 64.1 Citizenship Amendment Bill: India's new 'anti-Muslim' law explained , BBC News, 11 December 2019.
65. ↑ 65.0 65.1 "Parliament passes the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2019". https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=195783.
66. ↑ 66.0 66.1 66.2 66.3 Slater, Joanna (18 December 2019). "Why protests are erupting over India's new citizenship law". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/why-indias-citizenship-law-is-so-contentious/2019/12/17/35d75996-2042-11ea-b034-de7dc2b5199b_story.html.
67. ↑ "Interview with Indira Gandhi". TV Eye. 18 December 2016. https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/who-we-are/indira-gandhi-interview-tv-eye-1978-585652e6031fe-290724.html.
68. ↑ "Recalling the Emergency years". The Indian Express. 29 June 2015. http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/recalling-the-emergency-1975-77-the-emergency-at-work/.
69. ↑ Hansen 1999, p. 85.
70. ↑ 70.00 70.01 70.02 70.03 70.04 70.05 70.06 70.07 70.08 70.09 70.10 70.11 Swain 2001, pp. 71–104.
71. ↑ 71.0 71.1 71.2 71.3 71.4 Seshia 1998, pp. 1036–1050.
72. ↑ 72.0 72.1 72.2 72.3 72.4 Gillan 2002, pp. 73–95.
73. ↑ 73.0 73.1 Sen 2005, p. 63.
74. ↑ International Religious Freedom Report 2005.
75. ↑ The Hindu 2002.
76. ↑ Davies 2005.
77. ↑ BBC & January 2014.
78. ↑ "Narendra Modi and the struggle for India's soul". The Economist. 2 March 2019. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2019/03/02/narendra-modi-and-the-struggle-for-indias-soul.
79. ↑ 79.0 79.1 Ganguly, Sumit (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote: The Risks Ahead". Journal of Democracy 25 (4): 56–60. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0077.
80. ↑ Joshua, Anita (16 July 2014). "Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate". The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/choice-of-ichr-chief-reignites-saffronisation-debate/article6214483.ece.
81. ↑ Mukul, Akshaya (18 July 2014). "Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection". The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Right-wingers-question-ICHR-chief-selection/articleshow/38581467.cms.
82. ↑ Bhatty, Kiran (2019). "School education: Denials and delusions". in Azad, Rohit. A quantum leap in the wrong direction?. ISBN 978-93-5287-618-1. OCLC 1089418969.
83. ↑ "Parliament approves Resolution to repeal Article 370; paves way to truly integrate J&K with Indian Union". https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192505,.
84. ↑ Article 370 rendered toothless, Article 35A ceases to exist , The Economic Times, 5 August 2019.
85. ↑ "The Gazette of India". http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2019/210049.pdf.
86. ↑ Ramachandran 2003.
87. ↑ "Assam's fascinating politics & how RSS took BJP to the top in a state where it didn't exist" (in en-US). 17 March 2021. https://theprint.in/opinion/assams-fascinating-politics-how-rss-took-bjp-to-the-top-in-a-state-where-it-didnt-exist/623280/.
88. ↑ Regan, Helen; Gupta, Swati; Khan, Omar. "India passes controversial citizenship bill that excludes Muslims". CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-bill-intl-hnk/index.html. "The government, ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the bill seeks to protect religious minorities who fled persecution in their home countries."
89. ↑ Gringlas, Sam. "India Passes Controversial Citizenship Bill That Would Exclude Muslims". NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/12/11/787220640/india-passes-controversial-citizenship-bill-that-would-exclude-muslims.
90. ↑ Ellis-Peterson, Hannah; Azizur Rahman, Shaikh (16 March 2020), "Delhi's Muslims despair of justice after police implicated in riots", The Guardian (Delhi), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/16/delhis-muslims-despair-justice-police-implicated-hindu-riots, retrieved 17 March 2020
91. ↑ Gettleman, Jeffrey; Abi-Habib, Maria (1 March 2020), "In India, Modi's Policies Have Lit a Fuse", The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/world/asia/india-modi-hindus.html, retrieved 1 March 2020
92. ↑ Gettleman, Jeffrey; Yasir, Sameer; Raj, Suhasini; Kumar, Hari (12 March 2020), Photographs by Loke, Atul, "'If We Kill You, Nothing Will Happen': How Delhi's Police Turned Against Muslims", The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/12/world/asia/india-police-muslims.html, retrieved 13 March 2020
93. ↑ Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (6 March 2020), "In Delhi's worst violence in decades, a man watched his brother burn", The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-delhis-worst-violence-in-decades-a-man-watched-his-brother-burn/2020/03/05/892dbb12-5e45-11ea-ac50-18701e14e06d_story.html, retrieved 6 March 2020
94. ↑ Slater, Joanna; Masih, Niha (2 March 2020), "What Delhi's worst communal violence in decades means for Modi's India", The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/what-days-of-communal-violence-mean-for-modi-and-for-india/2020/03/01/3d649c18-5a68-11ea-8efd-0f904bdd8057_story.html, retrieved 15 March 2020
95. ↑ "Modi slammed as death toll in New Delhi violence rises". Al Jazeera. 26 February 2020. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/02/modi-slammed-death-toll-delhi-violence-rises-200226192504695.html.
96. ↑ Varadarajan, Siddharth (27 February 2020). "Narendra Modi's Reckless Politics Brings Mob Rule to New Delhi". The Wire. https://thewire.in/communalism/narendra-modi-delhi-riots-mob-violence-bjp.
97. ↑ Times of India 2013.
98. ↑ Buncombe 2014.
99. ↑ Ramaseshan 2013.
100. ↑ Business Standard 2014.
101. ↑ "Indian government opposes same sex marriage, saying family is 'union of biological man and woman'". The Independent. 25 February 2021. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/same-sex-marriage-india-b1807278.html.
102. ↑ 102.0 102.1 102.2 102.3 102.4 Shulman 2000, pp. 365–390.
103. ↑ Tiwari 2012.
104. ↑ Guha 2007, pp. 710–720.
105. ↑ Sen 2005, p. 70.
106. ↑ Sheela Bhatt 2014.
107. ↑ 107.0 107.1 Bobbio 2012, pp. 652–668.
108. ↑ Jaffrelot 2013, pp. 79–95.
109. ↑ 109.0 109.1 109.2 Ruparelia, Sanjay (12 January 2016). "'Minimum Government, Maximum Governance': The Restructuring of Power in Modi's India". Journal of South Asian Studies 38 (4): 755–775. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089974. ISSN 0085-6401.
110. ↑ 110.0 110.1 110.2 Shah, Alpa; Lerche, Jens (10 October 2015). "India's Democracy: Illusion of Inclusion". Economic & Political Weekly 50 (41): 33–36. https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/41/book-reviews/indias-democracy-illusion-inclusion.html. Retrieved 18 March 2023.
111. ↑ "Cabinet approves raising FDI cap in defence to 49 percent, opens up railways". The Times of India. 7 August 2014. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-07/news/52555932_1_defence-sector-cent-fdi-railways-sector.
112. ↑ Zhong, Raymond (20 November 2014). "Modi Presses Reform for India—But Is it Enough?". The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/modi-presses-reform-for-india-but-is-it-enough-1416466742.
113. ↑ "Modi renews labour reforms push as jobs regain focus before polls". The Economic Times. 14 March 2018. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modi-renews-labour-reforms-push-as-jobs-regain-focus-before-polls/articleshow/63297358.cms.
114. ↑ "Modi rolls out his populist plans with a second term in mind". The Nikkei. https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Modi-rolls-out-his-populist-plans-with-a-second-term-in-mind.
115. ↑ "Why India opted out of world's biggest today". Times of India. 15 November 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/why-india-opted-out-of-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-signed-today/articleshow/79230628.cms.
116. ↑ "Out of RCEP, India seeks an export passage to Africa". Nikkei. 3 December 2020. https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Out-of-RCEP-India-seeks-an-export-passage-to-Africa. "India has made a calculated move to shift its focus from multilateral trade to protectionism."
117. ↑ "Modi forced to tread different path in post-Trump era". Financial Times. 23 November 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/b98a768d-1e2b-4ec0-94ed-75b24daee961.
118. ↑ "India Tariffs Show Modi's Protectionist U-Turn". Bloomberg. 19 February 2020. https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/trade-war-latest-modi-makes-a-u-turn-k6t9lj64.
119. ↑ 119.0 119.1 119.2 119.3 Ganguly 1999, pp. 148–177.
120. ↑ 120.0 120.1 120.2 120.3 120.4 120.5 120.6 Krishnan 2004, pp. 1–37.
121. ↑ 121.0 121.1 Kux 2002, pp. 93–106.
122. ↑ 122.0 122.1 Qadir 2002, pp. 1–10.
123. ↑ 123.0 123.1 Abbas 2004, p. 173.
124. ↑ Times of India 2002.
125. ↑ "Ex-Army chief Dalbir Singh praises PM Narendra Modi for surgical strikes in Pakistan, Myanmar". The Economic Times. 11 July 2018. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/ex-army-chief-dalbir-singh-praises-pm-narendra-modi-for-surgical-strikes-in-pakistan-myanmar/articleshow/60885703.cms.
126. ↑ "Doklam Standoff: Who's Involved & Why's India Bothered?". The Quint. 14 October 2017. https://www.thequint.com/news/india/doklam-standoff-explained.
127. ↑ Mukherjee, Anit (5 May 2021). "The Great Churning: Modi's Transformation of the Indian Military" (in en-US). https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/the-great-churning-modis-transformation-of-the-indian-military/.
128. ↑ "BJP Manifesto 2019: National security, welfare key themes for Modi's re-election bid – 5 takeaways" (in en). The Financial Express (India). 8 April 2019. https://www.financialexpress.com/elections/bjp-manifesto-2019-national-security-welfare-key-themes-for-modis-re-election-bid-5-takeaways/1541500/.
129. ↑ "Explained: What is Chief of Defence Staff that PM Modi announced in I-Day speech" (in en). India Today. 16 August 2019. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/explained-what-is-chief-of-defence-staff-cds-pm-narendra-modi-independence-day-speech-1581018-2019-08-15.
130. ↑ Singh, Rahul (24 December 2019). "Govt sets up Dept of Military Affairs to be headed by Chief of Defence Staff" (in en). Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-sets-up-dept-of-military-affairs-to-be-headed-by-chief-of-defence-staff/story-eIC4HPIpbexJgGtpEfMaLI.html.
131. ↑ 131.0 131.1 131.2 131.3 131.4 131.5 131.6 131.7 131.8 Chaulia 2002, pp. 215–234.
132. ↑ 132.0 132.1 Harris 2005, pp. 7–27.
133. ↑ Inbar, Efraim (2016). US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century. Taylor & Francis. p. 155.
134. ↑ "Multipolar world should include multipolar Asia: Jaishankar". The Hindu. 19 September 2020. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/multipolar-world-should-include-multipolar-asia-jaishankar/article32644407.ece.
135. ↑ Lall 2006.
136. ↑ Pradhan, Sharat. Vajpayee condemns NATO war in Kosovo. . Rediff, 29 March 1999.
137. ↑ Faiola, Anthony. Yugoslavia Air Campaign Ignites Anti-U.S. Sentiment. . The Washington Post , 18 May 1999.
138. ↑ "BJP Passes Resolution 'Deploring' Iraq War". Arab News. 5 April 2003. https://www.arabnews.com/node/230278.
139. ↑ "Condemn air strikes on Libya: MPs". The Hindu. 23 March 2011. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national//article60530375.ece.
140. ↑ "India PM Modi in surprise Pakistan visit". BBC. 25 December 2015. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-35178594.
141. ↑ "PM Modi offers condolences to Sharif on his mother's death". Times of India. 18 December 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/pm-modi-offers-condolences-to-sharif-on-his-mothers-death/articleshow/79790702.cms.
142. ↑ "The Modi Years: Where does India's Pakistan policy stand?". Scroll.in. 26 February 2019. https://scroll.in/article/914369/the-modi-years-where-does-indias-pakistan-policy-stand.
143. ↑ "Nepal PM Wants India to Lift Undeclared Blockade". NDTV. 15 November 2015. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/nepal-pm-wants-india-to-lift-undeclared-blockade-1243695.
144. ↑ Martin, Michael (22 November 2021). "Prime Minister Modi and Myanmar's Military Junta". https://www.csis.org/analysis/prime-minister-modi-and-myanmars-military-junta.
145. ↑ Haidar, Suhasini (22 December 2022). "India abstains from UNSC vote on Myanmar, calls for constructive diplomacy". The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/india-china-russia-abstain-on-unsc-resolution-on-myanmar/article66291314.ece.
146. ↑ "Why India maintains neutral stand in Russia-Ukraine war? PM Modi answers". Livemint. 10 March 2022. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/why-india-maintains-neutral-stand-in-russia-ukraine-war-pm-modi-answers-11646930954628.html.
147. ↑ "Opposition on India's Russia resolution abstention: 'Same side as China'". Hindustan Times. 26 February 2022. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/opposition-as-india-skips-russia-resolution-vote-stood-on-same-side-as-china-101645862429168.html.
148. ↑ "Ukraine crisis: Congress backs decision to abstain from voting on UN resolutions". The Times of India. 3 March 2022. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ukraine-crisis-congress-backs-decision-to-abstain-from-voting-on-un-resolutions/articleshow/89967628.cms.
149. ↑ Times of India 2012.
150. ↑ First Post 2015.
151. ↑ "BJP becomes largest political party in the world", The Times of India, 30 March 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-becomes-largest-political-party-in-the-world/articleshow/46739025.cms
152. ↑ Kuchay, Bilal (2022-07-06). "India ruling party has no Muslim MP for the first time in history". Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/6/india-ruling-party-has-no-muslim-mp-for-the-first-time-in-history.
153. ↑ Bhatnagar, Gaurav Vivek (2022-07-07). "From July 7, BJP Will Have No Muslim Representatives in Parliament, Assemblies". The Wire. https://thewire.in/government/in-one-months-time-bjp-will-have-no-muslim-representatives-in-parliament-assemblies.
154. ↑ "BJP v CCP: The rise of the world's biggest political party" (in en-UK). Sydney Morning Herald. 2022-10-16. https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/bjp-v-ccp-the-rise-of-the-world-s-biggest-political-party-20220916-p5bise.html.
155. ↑ "How BJP became world's largest political party in 4 decades" (in en-IN). The Times of India. 2022-04-16. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-10-charts-how-bjp-became-a-political-juggernaut-in-4-decades/articleshow/90680606.cms.
156. ↑ "Narendra Modi's Message to America" (in en-US). National Review. 2022-06-23. https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/narendra-modis-message-to-america/. ""His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP, or “Indian People’s Party”) is on the right of the Indian political spectrum. It is the largest political party in the world, with more members than the Chinese Communist Party, and supports Hindu nationalist ideology and economic development.""
157. ↑ National Informatics Centre 2014.
158. ↑ Election Commission 1984.
159. ↑ Election Commission 1989.
160. ↑ Election Commission 1991.
161. ↑ Election Commission 1996.
162. ↑ Election Commission 1998.
163. ↑ Election Commission 1999.
164. ↑ Election Commission 2004.
165. ↑ Election Commission 2009.
166. ↑ Election Commission 2014.
167. ↑ Kumar, Sanjay (28 May 2019). "BJP: Here's how BJP earned the massive mandate: Explained in numbers". The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/india/heres-how-bjp-earned-massive-mandate-explained-in-numbers/articleshow/69529857.cms.
168. ↑ "20. Performance of National Parties". https://eci.gov.in/files/file/10955-20-performance-of-national-parties/.
169. ↑ Pisharoty, Sangeeta Barooah (25 May 2016). "BJP Crafts North East Democratic Alliance to Make the Region 'Congress Mukt'". https://thewire.in/politics/bjp-crafts-north-east-democratic-alliance-to-make-the-region-congress-mukt.
170. ↑ "Amit Shah holds meeting with northeast CMs, forms alliance". 25 May 2016. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/amit-shah-holds-meeting-with-northeast-cms-forms-alliance/story-YDYLQ6YsImuzZOQ6Zev5MO.html.
171. ↑ "BJP Acts East With New Anti-Congress Bloc, Puts Himanta Biswa in Charge". http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hours-after-sonowal-oath-ceremony-bjp-forms-anti-congress-bloc-in-northeast-1409824.

### General and cited sources

* Sharma, Chetna (2019), "Citizenship Amendment Bill 2016: Continuities and contestations with special reference to politics in Assam, India", Asian Ethnicity 20 (4): 522–540, doi:10.1080/14631369.2019.1601993
* Sen, Uditi (2018), Citizen Refugee: Forging the Indian Nation after Partition, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-108-42561-2, https://books.google.com/books?id=vAtmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA260, retrieved 16 June 2020
* Jayal, Niraja Gopal (2019), "Reconfiguring Citizenship in Contemporary India", South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 42 (1): 33–50, doi:10.1080/00856401.2019.1555874
* Abbas, Hassan (2004). Pakistan's Drift into Extremism: Allah, The Army, And America's War on Terror. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-1497-1. https://archive.org/details/pakistansdriftin00hass.
* "Uproar over India mosque report: Inquiry into Babri mosque's demolition in 1992 indicts opposition BJP leaders". Al Jazeera. 24 November 2009. http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/11/2009112454918803725.html.
* Banerjee, Sumanta (22 July 2005). "Civilising the BJP". Economic & Political Weekly 40 (29): 3116–3119.
* "Narendra Modi sworn in as Indian prime minister". BBC News. 26 May 2014. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-27572807.
* "Indian Astrology vs Indian Science". BBC World Service. http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/highlights/010531_vedic.shtml.
* Bhatt, Sheela. "What Anandiben Patel is really like". Rediff. http://www.rediff.com/news/report/ls-election-modi-likely-to-acknowledge-the-power-of-the-patlani/20140520.htm.
* Bobbio, Tommaso (2012). "Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India". Third World Quarterly 33 (4): 653–668. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.657423. https://zenodo.org/record/1047619. Retrieved 29 June 2019.
* Brass, Paul R. (2005). The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. University of Washington Press. pp. 385–393. ISBN 978-0-295-98506-0.
* Buncombe, Andrew (11 July 2014). "India's gay community scrambling after court decision recriminalises homosexuality". The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/indias-gay-community-scrambling-after-court-decision-recriminalises-homosexuality-9146244.html.
* "It is the govt.'s responsibility to protect LGBT rights, says Harsh Vardhan". Business Standard (Mumbai, India). 17 July 2014. http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/it-is-the-govt-s-responsibility-to-protect-lgbt-rights-says-harsh-vardhan-114071700531_1.html.
* Chaulia, Sreeram (June 2002). "BJP, India's Foreign Policy and the "Realist Alternative" to the Nehruvian Tradition". International Politics 39 (2): 215–234. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8897388.
* Davies, Richard (2005). "The Cultural Background of Hindutva". in Ayres & Oldenburg, Alyssa & Philip. India Briefing; Takeoff at Last?. Asia Society.
* "Narendra Modi to be sworn in as 15th Prime Minister of India on May 26". 20 May 2014. http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140520/nation-current-affairs/article/will-narendra-modi-stake-claim-form-government-today.
* Diwakar, Rekha (2014). "The 16th general election in India, April–May 2014". Electoral Studies 37: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.005.
* "General Election to Lok Sabha Trends and Results". Election Commission of India. http://eciresults.nic.in/.
* "List of Political Parties and Election Symbols main Notification Dated 18 January 2013". India: Election Commission of India. 2013. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/ElecSym19012013_eng.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 1984 to the Eighth Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1984/Vol_I_LS_84.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 1989 to the Ninth Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1989/Vol_I_LS_89.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1991/VOL_I_91.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1996/Vol_I_LS_96.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1998/Vol_I_LS_98.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf.
* "Statistical report on general elections, 2004 to the Fourteenth Lok Sabha". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_2004/Vol_I_LS_2004.pdf.
* "Performance of National Parties". Election Commission of India. http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/12_PerformanceOfNationalParties.pdf.
* Fitzgerald, Timothy (2011). Religion and Politics in International Relations: The Modern Myth. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-4411-4290-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=0M_cKlsLllEC. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
* Flint, Colin (2005). The geography of war and peace. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516208-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=7Ms5N7NhGXIC&pg=PA165. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
* Ganguly, Sumit (Spring 1999). "India's Pathway to Pokhran II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program". International Security 23 (4): 148–177. doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.148.
* Ghassem-Fachandi, Parvis (2012). Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15177-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=p5s8hooZfekC.
* Gillan, Michael (March 2002). "Refugees or Infiltrators? The Bharatiya Janata Party and "Illegal" Migration from Bangladesh". Asian Studies Review 26 (1): 73–95. doi:10.1080/10357820208713331.
* Guha, Ramachandra (2007). India after Gandhi: the history of the world's largest democracy (1st ed.). India: Picador. ISBN 978-0-330-39610-3.
* Gupta, Dipankar (2011). Justice before Reconciliation: Negotiating a 'New Normal' in Post-riot Mumbai and Ahmedabad. Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-415-61254-8.
* Halarnkar, Samar (13 June 2012). "Narendra Modi makes his move". BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18352532. "The right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), India's primary opposition party"
* Hansen, Thomas (1999). The saffron wave : democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00671-0.
* Harris, Gardiner (2 July 2012). "Justice and 'a Ray of Hope' After 2002 India Riots". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/world/asia/gujarat-riot-trials-may-alter-indias-cycle-of-violence.html.
* Harris, Jerry (2005). "Emerging Third World powers: China, India and Brazil". Race & Class 46 (7): 7–27. doi:10.1177/0306396805050014.
* "The Meaning of Verdict 2004". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 14 May 2004. http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/14/stories/2004051406131000.htm.
* "Inventing History". The Hindu. 14 October 2002.
* "Modi did not incite riots: SIT". Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/modi-did-not-incite-riots-sit/article1-1050396.aspx.
* "2009 Lok Sabha election: Final results tally". Hindustan Times. 17 May 2009. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/2009-lok-sabha-election-final-results-tally/article1-411793.aspx.
* "Tehelka sting: How Bangaru Laxman fell for the trap". http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tehelka-sting-how-bangaru-laxman-fell-for-the-trap/1/186303.html.
* Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 978-1-85065-301-1.
* Jaffrelot, Christophe (June 2013). "Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class". Studies in Indian Politics 1: 2–27. doi:10.1177/2321023013482789.
* Jha, Nilanjana Bhaduri (21 February 2003). "Survey shows temple remains in Ayodhya: VHP". The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Survey-shows-temple-remains-in-Ayodhya-VHP/articleshow/38195328.cms.
* Kattakayam, Jiby (27 April 2012). "Bangaru Laxman convicted of taking bribe". The Hindu (Chennai, India). http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3360364.ece.
* Krishnan, Jayanth (2004). "India's "Patriot Act": POTA and the Impact on Civil Liberties in the World's Largest Democracy". Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice 22 (2): 265–300. ISSN 2767-1992. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/379. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
* Krishnan, Murali; Shamil Shams (11 March 2012). "Modi's clearance in the Gujarat riots case angers Indian Muslims". Deutsche Welle. http://www.dw.de/modis-clearance-in-the-gujarat-riots-case-angers-indian-muslims/a-15874606.
* Kux, Dennis (May–June 2002). "India's Fine Balance". Foreign Affairs 81 (3): 93–106. doi:10.2307/20033165.
* Lall, Marie (December 2006). "Indo-Myanmar Relations in the Era of Pipeline Diplomacy". Contemporary Southeast Asia 28 (3): 424–446. doi:10.1355/CS28-3D.
* Malik, Yogendra K.; Singh, V.B. (April 1992). "Bharatiya Janata Party: An Alternative to the Congress (I)?". Asian Survey 32 (4): 318–336. doi:10.2307/2645149.
* Mathew, Liz (16 May 2014). "Narendra Modi makes election history as BJP gets majority on its own". Live Mint. http://www.livemint.com/Politics/vGyzihxgQEuYmzRmyRA1vN/Election-results-2014-Counting-begins-as-Narendra-Modi-eyes.html.
* Naqvi, Saba; Raman, Anuradha (1 April 2013). "Their Dark Glasses". Outlook. http://www.outlookindia.com/article/their-dark-glasses/284546. Retrieved 23 May 2015.
* "Lok Sabha at a glance". National Informatics Centre. http://legislativebodiesinindia.nic.in/LS/ataglace.htm.
* "Report: Sequence of events on December 6". NDTV. http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/report_sequence_of_events_on_december_6.php.
* "Naroda Patiya riots: Former minister Maya Kodnani gets 28 years in jail". NDTV.com. http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/naroda-patiya-riots-former-minister-maya-kodnani-gets-18-years-in-jail-261251.
* Noorani, A. G. (March–April 1978). "Foreign Policy of the Janata Party Government". Asian Affairs 5 (4): 216–228. doi:10.1080/00927678.1978.10554044.
* Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Harvard University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6.
* Pai, Sudha (December 1996). "Transformation of the Indian Party System: The 1996 Lok Sabha Elections". Asian Survey 36 (12): 1170–1183. doi:10.2307/2645573.
* Qadir, Shaukat (April 2002). "An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999". http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/kargil/JA00199.pdf.
* Ramachandran, Sujata (15 February 2003). "'Operation Pushback' Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi". Economic & Political Weekly 38 (7): 637–647.
* Ramaseshan, Radhika (14 December 2013). "BJP comes out, vows to oppose homosexuality". The Telegraph (Calcutta, India). http://www.telegraphindia.com/1131214/jsp/nation/story_17679913.jsp.
* Ramesh, Randeep (14 May 2004). "News World news Shock defeat for India's Hindu nationalists". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/14/india.randeepramesh.
* "TDP helps Vajpayee wins confidence vote". http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/28bjp.htm.
* Sen, Amartya (2005). India and the world. (1. publ. ed.). Allen Lane: 2005.. ISBN 978-0-7139-9687-6.
* Seshia, Shaila (November 1998). "Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party". Asian Survey 38 (11): 1036–1050. doi:10.2307/2645684.
* Shulman, Stephen (September 2000). "Nationalist Sources of International Economic Integration". International Studies Quarterly 44 (3): 365–390. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00164.
* Sridharan, Eswaran (October 2014). "India's Watershed Vote". Journal of Democracy 25 (4). doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0068. https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/upiasi/Journal of Democracy, Sridharan article 2014.pdf. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
* Swain, Pratap Chandra (2001). Bharatiya Janata Party: Profile and Performance. India: APH publishing. pp. 71–104. ISBN 978-81-7648-257-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=7Gk1Wz4k_xUC. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
* "Bangaru Laxman convicted for taking bribe". http://www.tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=Ws270412Bangaru.asp.
* "Election results 2014: India places its faith in Moditva". Timesofindia.indiatimes.com. 17 May 2014. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Election-results-2014-India-places-its-faith-in-Moditva/articleshow/35224486.cms.
* "SP condemns Vaiko's arrest under Pota". The Times of India. 13 July 2002. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2002-07-13/mumbai/27289812_1_vaiko-pota-prevention-of-terrorism-act.
* "BJP amends constitution allowing Gadkari to get a second term". The Times of India. 28 September 2012. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-amends-constitution-allowing-Nitin-Gadkari-to-get-a-second-term/articleshow/16587211.cms.
* "Stand with RSS, BJP". The Times of India. 20 December 2013. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-20/news/45418111_1_sc-verdict-bjp-and-rss-review-petition.
* Chatterjee, Mohua (13 July 2015). "BJP enrolls 11 crore members, launches 'Mahasampark Abhiyan'". First Post. http://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjp-enrolls-11-crore-members-launches-mahasampark-abhiyan-2339462.html.
* Tiwari, Aviral Kumar (March 2012). "An Error-Correction Analysis of India-Us Trade Flows". Journal of Economic Development 37 (1).
* "India: International Religious Freedom Report". US Department of state. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2005/51618.htm.
* Vajpayee, Atal Bihari (2007). "Hindu Nationalism: A Reader". in Jaffrelot, Christophe. Hindu Nationalism: A Reader. Delhi: Permanent Black. ISBN 978-0-691-13098-9.
* Varshney, Ashutosh (October 2014). "Hindu Nationalism in Power?". Journal of Democracy 25 (4): 34–45. doi:10.1353/jod.2014.0071.

## Further reading

* Ahuja, Gurdas M. (2004). Bharatiya Janata Party and Resurgent India. Ram Company.
* Andersen, Walter K.; Damle, Shridhar D. (1987). The Brotherhood in Saffron: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu Revivalism. Delhi: Vistaar Publications. https://archive.org/details/brotherhoodinsaf0000ande.
* Bhambhri, C.P. (2001). Bharatiya Janata Party : Periphery to Centre. Delhi: Shipra. ISBN 978-81-7541-078-7.
* Baxter, Craig (1971). The Jana Sangh — A Biography of an Indian Political Party. Oxford University Press, Bombay. ISBN 978-0-8122-7583-4. https://archive.org/details/janasanghbiograp0000baxt.
* Chadha, Kalyani; Guha, Pallavi (2016). "The Bharatiya Janata Party's online campaign and citizen involvement in India's 2014 election". International Journal of Communication 10. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4947. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
* Ganguly, Sumit (2015). "Hindu nationalism and the foreign policy of India's Bharatiya Janata Party". Transatlantic Academy Paper Series 2: 1–15. ISBN 978-1-5292-0460-5. https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Ganguly_HinduNationalismForeignPolicy_Jun15_web.pdf. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
* Graham, B. D. (1990). Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and Development of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-38348-6.
* Harriss, John (2015). "Hindu Nationalism in Action: The Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian Politics". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 38 (4): 712–718. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1089826.
* Malik, Yogendra K.; Singh, V.B. (1994). Hindu Nationalists in India : The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-8810-6.
* Jaffrelot, Christophe (1996). The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 978-1-85065-301-1.
* Jaffrelot, Christophe (July 2003). "Communal Riots in Gujarat: The State at Risk?". Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics: 16. http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4127/1/hpsacp17.pdf. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
* Jain, Varsha; B.E., Ganesh (2020). "Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders: A Case of India and Narendra Modi.". Journal of Political Marketing 19 (1–2): 15–33. doi:10.1080/15377857.2019.1652222.
* Mishra, Madhusudan (1997). Bharatiya Janata Party and India's Foreign Policy. New Delhi: Uppal Pub. House. ISBN 978-81-85565-79-8.
* Nag, Kingshuk (2014). The Saffron Tide: The Rise of the BJP. Rupa Publications. ISBN 978-8129134295.
* Nag, Kingshuk. Atal Bihari Vajpayee (Rupa Publications, 2016).
* Palshikar, Suhas, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Lodha, eds. Electoral Politics in India: The Resurgence of the Bharatiya Janata Party (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
* Raghavan, G.N.S. New Era in the Indian Polity, A Study of Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the BJP (1996).
* Sanjeev Kr, H. M. (2007). "Foreign Policy Position of Bharatiya Janata Party Towards Issues of India Pakistan Relations". The Indian Journal of Political Science 68 (2): 275–291. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856327. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
* Sharma, C.P. Thakur, Devendra P. (1999). India under Atal Behari Vajpayee : The BJP Era. New Delhi: UBS Publishers' Distributors. ISBN 978-81-7476-250-4.
* Stein, Burton (2010). A history of India (edited by David Arnold. 2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-9509-6.
* Rao, Ramesh (2001). Coalition conundrum: the BJP's trials, tribulations, and triumphs. Har Anand. ISBN 9788124108093.

## External links

* BJP at Curlie
* Error in Template:Internet Archive author: Bharatiya Janata Party doesn't exist.
* Bharatiya Janata Party at the Encyclopædia Britannica

0.00

(0 votes)

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Bharatiya_Janata_Party&oldid=3850711"