Arno Petition Consultants

Petition Companies

Arno Petition Consultants, also known as Arno Political Consultants, is a company that offers signature gathering services to ballot initiative campaigns.

## Contents

* 1 About
* 2 Petition drives
* 2.1 Measures on the ballot (2016-2021)
* 3 Ballot initiative signature costs
* 3.1 Measuring the cost
* 4 Recent news
* 5 See also
* 6 External links
* 7 Footnotes

## About[edit]

Arno Petition Consultants is headquartered in California. On its website, the company said, "Over the past 36 years, APC has become the largest and most successful petition management firm in the country. Since our founding, we have qualified more than 700 state and local measures to the ballot in 46 states for a wide variety of national and local clients. APC has demonstrated an uncanny ability to meet very difficult signature obligations, often in very shortened timeframes. Some of our greatest accomplishments include qualifying a four-part referendum in which we collected 2.8 million signatures in less than seven weeks, collecting 1.6 million signatures on two initiatives in 28 days, and qualifying numerous statutes and constitutional amendments in 10 weeks or fewer."[1]

## Petition drives[edit]

The following ballot measures appeared on the ballot after the sponsoring campaign committee hired Arno Political Consultants to collect signatures. Since 2016, three ballot measures appeared on the ballot after the sponsoring committee(s) hired Arno Political Consultants to gather signatures. Of the three measures that appeared on the ballot, one was approved and two were defeated. Sponsoring committees paid an average of $1,663,304.45 in total for Arno Petition Consultants' signature gathering services per ballot measure.

### Measures on the ballot (2016-2021)[edit]

Year | Measure | Measure description | Total cost | Signatures required | CPRS | Outcome

|
|
|
|
|
|

2016 | California Proposition 52 | Voter approval of changes to the hospital fee program | $2,192,811.85 | 807,615 | $2.72 | a
2016 | Missouri Proposition A | Increase the tax on cigarettes by 23 cents | $750,996.50 | 98,618 | $7.62 | d
2020 | California Proposition 20 | Makes changes to policies related to criminal sentencing charges, prison release, and DNA collection | $2,046,104.99 | 365,880 | $5.59 | d

This chart was last updated after statewide ballot measure elections in 2021.

## Ballot initiative signature costs[edit]

See also: Laws governing the initiative process and Analysis of signature costs in past years

The cost of getting an initiative before voters varies widely by state and by initiative proposal. The requirements and restrictions imposed by state law form a major factor in the expense of an initiative signature petition effort.

Higher signature requirements are a straightforward example of a reason an initiative petition campaign might be more expensive in one state than in another. Other restrictions that can make a difference in the cost of a petition campaign include:

* Distribution requirements \- It is easier and less expensive to collect a lot of signatures in one very populous area than a small number of signatures from lots of smaller, less-populated areas.
* Pay-per-signature bans \- Paying signature gatherers by signature is one of the most cost-efficient ways to fund signature gathering efforts.
* Restrictions on circulators \- Restricting who can collect signatures limits competition between petition companies and professional signature gatherers.
* Initiative petition circulation periods \- If proponents have less time to collect signatures, the process can be more expensive.

### Measuring the cost[edit]

See also: Analysis of signature costs in past years

Ballotpedia uses two ways to measure the cost of an initiative or veto referendum petition drive.

1. According to the total cost of gathering the required signatures to put the initiative or veto referendum on the ballot
2. According to the total cost divided by the number of signatures required to qualify the measure for the ballot or Cost Per Required Signature (CPRS)

Total cost: The total cost depends on all of the factors that can make a petition effort more or less expensive, including the population of the state and the state's signature requirements. This measurement does not necessarily indicate how difficult it is to run a signature petition campaign in a state relative to other states or how hard and expensive it is to collect a given valid signature. It takes into consideration the population and signature requirements for a state. For example, the average total cost of a successful initiative petition drive in California in 2016 was just over $2.9 million, while in Oklahoma the average total cost was about $870,000. Initiatives in California, however, require over four times as many signatures and affect 10 times as many people.

Cost Per Required Signature (CPRS): The cost per required signature cuts out the variable of a state's signature requirements and shows the cost for each signature needed to qualify the measure for the ballot. This second measurement is a better indication of how difficult it is to run a signature petition campaign in a given state relative to other states. For example, the average CPRS in California in 2016 was $6.20 while the average CPRS in Oklahoma was $9.59, but the average total petition cost was $2.9 million in California and about $870,000 in Oklahoma.

From the perspective of a national organization or proponents of a national agenda, this means that a lower CPRS generally means that a campaign could potentially affect more people and achieve more political influence per dollar spent, while the total petition cost might dictate in which states the campaign could actually afford to launch a successful petition drive.

## Recent news[edit]

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Arno Petition Consultants. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

Arno Petition Consultants - Google News

## See also[edit]

* Ballot initiative
* Ballot measures cost per required signatures analysis
* Petition drive management companies
* Laws governing the initiative process

## External links[edit]

* Arno Petition Consultants website

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ Arno Petition Consultants, "About Us," accessed January 26, 2022

State ballot measures

State

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Year

2028 • 2027 • 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005 • 2004 • 2003 • 2002 • 2001 • 2000 • 1999 • 1998 • 1997 • 1996 • 1995 • 1994 • 1993 • 1992 • 1991 • 1990 • 1989 • 1988 • 1987 • 1986 • 1985 • 1984 • 1983 • 1982 • 1981 • 1980 • 1979 • 1978 • 1977 • 1976 • 1975 • 1974 • 1973 • 1972 • 1971 • 1970 • 1969 • 1968 • 1967 • 1966 • 1965 • 1964 • 1963 • 1962 • 1961 • 1960 • 1959 • 1958 • 1957 • 1956 • 1955 • 1954 • 1953 • 1952 • 1951 • 1950 • 1949 • 1948 • 1947 • 1946 • 1945 • 1944 • 1943 • 1942 • 1941 • 1940 • 1939 • 1938 • 1937 • 1936 • 1935 • 1934 • 1933 • 1932 • 1931 • 1930 • 1929 • 1928 • 1927 • 1926 • 1925 • 1924 • 1923 • 1922 • 1921 • 1920 • 1919 • 1918 • 1917 • 1916 • 1915 • 1914 • 1913 • 1912 • 1911 • 1910 • 1909 • 1908 • 1907 • 1906 • 1905 • 1904 • 1903 • 1902 • 1901 • 1900 • 1899 • 1898 • 1897 • 1896 • 1895 • 1894 • 1893 • 1892 • 1891 • 1890 • 1889 • 1888 • 1887 • 1886 • 1885 • 1884 • 1883 • 1882 • 1881 • 1880 • 1879 • 1878 • 1877 • 1876 • 1875 • 1874 • 1873 • 1872 • 1871 • 1870 • 1869 • 1868 • 1867 • 1866 • 1865 • 1864 • 1863 • 1862 • 1861 • 1860 • 1859 • 1858 • 1857 • 1856 • 1855 • 1854 • 1853 • 1852 • 1851 • 1850

v • e

Signature requirements

|

Signature
requirements |

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Petition
companies |

American Petition Consultants • Arno Political Consultants • Bader & Associates, Inc. • Canvasser Services • Capitol Assets • Democracy Direct • Democracy Resources • Discovery Petition Management • FieldWorks • JSM, Inc. • Kimball Petition Management • LAMM Political Partners, LLC • Masterson & Wright • National Ballot Access • National Petition Management • National Solutions • National Voter Outreach • PCI Consultants, Inc.

Terms |

Approved for circulation • Initiative petition circulation periods • Circulator • Circulator affidavit • Forged signature • Fraudulent signature • Invalid signature • Paid circulator • Petition • Random sampling • Registered voter • Signature certification • Signer • Signer intent • Valid signature • Volunteer circulator • Signature transcription

Petition drive
deadlines |

2008 deadlines • 2009 deadlines • 2010 deadlines • 2011 deadlines • 2012 deadlines • 2013 deadlines • 2014 deadlines • 2015 deadlines • 2016 deadlines • 2017 deadlines • 2018 deadlines • 2019 deadlines • 2020 deadlines • 2021 deadlines • 2022 deadlines • 2023 deadlines • 2024 deadlines • 2025 deadlines • 2026 deadlines •

Signature law |

States where signature requirements are based on votes cast for governor