Idaho Incumbent Judicial Candidate Initiative (2012)

Not on Ballot

This measure was not put
on an election ballot

## Contents

* 1 See also
* 2 Footnotes

The Idaho Incumbent Judicial Candidate Initiative did not make the 2012 ballot in the state of Idaho as a proposed citizen-initiated ballot measure. Larry Spencer, a Republican activist from northern Idaho, announced in March 2011 that he planned to circulate petitions to qualify the initiative for the November 2012 ballot that would have changed the way names of incumbent judges are listed on Idaho ballots.[1]

The change Spencer seeked is to end the practice of identifying, on the ballot, which judicial candidates are incumbents. Judicial candidates in Idaho are nonpartisan and therefore are not listed on the ballot with a party label. However, the current practice is to indicate by the name of a judicial candidate who is an incumbent that he or she is the incumbent in the race.

According to Spencer, putting a designation on the ballot to indicate which judges are incumbents gives those incumbents an advantage in judicial elections, since many voters are unfamiliar with the candidates in a judicial election when they enter the voting booth and may therefore typically default to voting for the incumbent.[1]

Spencer tried, but unsuccessfully, to get the Idaho State Legislature to adopt his idea of only listing the names of the candidates on the ballot, without their incumbency status. After his preferred legislation failed, he announced that he would attempt to put the matter before the state's voters by collecting about 45,000 signatures on a ballot initiative petition.[1]

## See also[edit]

* 2012 ballot measures
* Idaho 2012 ballot measures

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Idaho Statesman, "Activist pushes changes to judicial ballots," March 28, 2011

v • e

2012 ballot measures

I&R States|

Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Florida • Idaho • Illinois • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Mexico • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • South Dakota • Utah • Washington • Wyoming

Non I&R States|

Alabama • Georgia • Hawaii • Kansas • Kentucky • Minnesota • New Hampshire • New Jersey • North Carolina • South Carolina • Rhode Island • Virginia • West Virginia

Political topics|

Abortion • Admin of gov't • Affirmative action • Bonds • Constitutional conventions • Civil rights • Death penalty • Education • Elections • Eminent domain • Environment • Firearms • Gambling • Healthcare • Hunting • Immigration • Insurance • Judicial reform • Labor • Language • Law enforcement • Marijuana • Marriage and family • Motto and symbols • Natural resources • Pension • Property • Redistricting measures • Religion • Legislative salaries • State budgets • State executives • State judiciary • Taxes • Term limits • Tobacco • Transportation

Other|

Scorecard • Petition drive deadlines • 2012 ballot measure petition signature costs • Polls • Lawsuits • Potential measures • Tuesday Count • Changes in 2012 to laws governing ballot measures • Campaign websites • Official voter guides • Not on the ballot

Post-election|

2012 analyses • 2012 election results • Campaign contributions

v • e

State of Idaho
Boise (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy