Gender-equality paradox

It's a social construct
Gender

Spectra and binaries

* Day of Silence
* Pink Stinks
* Misandry
* Radical feminism
* Sex segregation in public restrooms
* Grievance studies hoax
* Sex and gender in sport
* Feminism
* Conversion therapy
* Helen Joyce
* Cass Review
* Beira's Place

v \- t \- e

The gender-equality paradox is the counter-intuitive finding, reported by Stoet and Geary,[1] that countries with a higher level of gender equality tend to have less gender balance in disciplines such as science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), than countries with a lower level of gender equality.

## Contents

* 1 Stoet and Geary's study
* 2 See also
* 3 External links
* 4 References

## Stoet and Geary's study[edit]

Using an international database on adolescent achievement in science, mathematics, and reading, Stoet and Geary showed that girls performed similarly to or better than boys in science in two of every three countries, and in nearly all countries, more girls appeared capable of college-level STEM study than had enrolled. Paradoxically, the sex differences in the magnitude of relative academic strengths and pursuit of STEM degrees rose with increases in national gender equality.

## See also[edit]

* Pay gap
* Sexism

## External links[edit]

* See the Wikipedia article on Gender-equality paradox.

## References[edit]

1. ↑ Stoet, Gijsbert; Geary, David C. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. 29. pp. 581-593.

This gender-related article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.