North Dakota Oil Taxes for Wildlife Projects Amendment (2012)

Not on Ballot

This measure was not put
on an election ballot

## Contents

* 1 Support
* 2 Path to the ballot
* 3 See also
* 3.1 Articles
* 4 Footnotes

The North Dakota Oil Taxes for Wildlife Projects Amendment did not make the 2012 ballot in North Dakota as an initiated constitutional amendment.

The proposed measure would have redirected 5% of oil production and extraction tax revenues to a wildlife projects fund. The wildlife fund would have been managed by a nine-member appointed board. State estimates indicated that the fund could collect between $51 million and $84 million annually.[1]

## Support[edit]

Supporters included Nature Conservancy, Ducks Unlimited and the North Dakota Natural Resources Trust.[1]

## Path to the ballot[edit]

See also: North Dakota signature requirements

Supporters were required to collect and submit a minimum of 26,904 valid signatures by August 8, 2012 in order to qualify the proposed measure for the 2012 statewide ballot.

The proposed measure was approved for petition circulation by Secretary of State Al Jaeger.[2]

According to reports, supporters delivered 36,000 signatures on August 6, 2012, to the Secretary of State, who had until September 10 to verify the petitions.[3]

On September 4, 2012, Secretary Jaeger announced that the measure would not be on the ballot due to the invalidation of hundreds of signatures. It was determined during the verification process that several signature gatherers for the measure committed petition fraud by falsifying signatures.[4]

## See also[edit]

| Suggest a link

|

* North Dakota 2012 ballot measures
* 2012 ballot measures

### Articles[edit]

* North Dakota initiative proposes redirecting oil tax revenues for wildlife projects

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Associated Press, "Proposed North Dakota amendment reserves state oil taxes for wildlife, water projects," January 12, 2012
2. ↑ Associated Press, "Petition approved for ND amendment that takes portion of oil taxes for outdoors projects," January 25, 2012
3. ↑ INFORUM "North Dakota putting chunk of oil money in outdoor fund may be on ballot," August 6, 2012
4. ↑ Associated Press, "ND marijuana, conservation initiatives rejected; NDSU footballers accused of petition fraud," September 4, 2012

v • e

2012 ballot measures

I&R States|

Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Florida • Idaho • Illinois • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Mexico • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • South Dakota • Utah • Washington • Wyoming

Non I&R States|

Alabama • Georgia • Hawaii • Kansas • Kentucky • Minnesota • New Hampshire • New Jersey • North Carolina • South Carolina • Rhode Island • Virginia • West Virginia

Political topics|

Abortion • Admin of gov't • Affirmative action • Bonds • Constitutional conventions • Civil rights • Death penalty • Education • Elections • Eminent domain • Environment • Firearms • Gambling • Healthcare • Hunting • Immigration • Insurance • Judicial reform • Labor • Language • Law enforcement • Marijuana • Marriage and family • Motto and symbols • Natural resources • Pension • Property • Redistricting measures • Religion • Legislative salaries • State budgets • State executives • State judiciary • Taxes • Term limits • Tobacco • Transportation

Other|

Scorecard • Petition drive deadlines • 2012 ballot measure petition signature costs • Polls • Lawsuits • Potential measures • Tuesday Count • Changes in 2012 to laws governing ballot measures • Campaign websites • Official voter guides • Not on the ballot

Post-election|

2012 analyses • 2012 election results • Campaign contributions

v • e

State of North Dakota
Bismarck (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy