Lubbock Independent School District, Texas, elections (2020)

Texas 2020 elections

* * *

U.S. Senate • U.S. House • State executive offices • State Senate • State House • Special state legislative • Supreme court • Appellate courts • Local judges • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Recalls • How to run for office |

|
|

* Related content:
* Texas
* Lubbock Independent School District, Texas
* Texas school board elections, 2020
* Texas elections, 2020
* Public policy in Texas
* Influencers in Texas
* Fact checks in Texas
* Local elections
* Municipal governments
* Local courts
* School boards
* Local ballot measures
* Recalls
* State elections
* State executives
* State legislatures
* State courts
* State ballot measures
* Federal elections

<- 2018

Lubbock Independent School District elections

* * *

Filing deadline
February 14, 2020
General election date
November 3, 2020
Enrollment ('17-'18)
27,998 students

Four seats on the Lubbock Independent School District school board in Texas were up for general election on November 3, 2020. The filing deadline for this election was February 14, 2020.

This election was originally scheduled on May 2, 2020, but was moved to November 3, 2020, amid concerns about the coronavirus pandemic.[1] In a proclamation made on March 18, 2020, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) suspended Sections 41.0052(a) and (b) of the Texas election code. This allowed local governments to move elections scheduled on May 2, 2020, to the next uniform state election date, which fell on November 3, 2020. This suspension only applied to elections occurring in 2020.[2]

## Contents

* 1 Election procedure changes in 2020
* 2 Elections
* 3 At-large
* 4 District 1
* 5 District 2
* 6 District 5
* 7 Additional elections on the ballot
* 7.1 What was at stake?
* 7.1.1 Report a story for this election
* 7.1.2 Candidate survey
* 7.2 About the district
* 7.3 Pivot Counties
* 7.3.1 Presidential results by legislative district
* 7.4 See also
* 7.5 External links
* 7.6 Footnotes

## Election procedure changes in 2020[edit]

See also: Changes to election dates, procedures, and administration in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.

Texas modified its absentee/mail-in voting, candidate filing, and early voting procedures for the November 3, 2020, general election as follows:

* Absentee/mail-in voting: Local election officials could not reject an absentee ballot due to a perceived signature mismatch unless the voter was given a pre-rejection notice of this finding and a "meaningful opportunity to cure his or her ballot's rejection." Return locations for absentee/mail-in ballots were limited to one per county.
* Candidate filing procedures: The petition deadline for independent candidates for non-presidential office was extended to August 13, 2020.
* Early voting: Early voting began on October 13, 2020.

For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.

## Elections[edit]

Click on the tabs below to show more information about those topics.

# At-large[edit]

General election

The general election was canceled. Zach Brady (Nonpartisan) won without appearing on the ballot.

# District 1[edit]

General election

##### General election for Lubbock Independent School District school board District 1

Incumbent Lala Chavez defeated Gwen Reyna in the general election for Lubbock Independent School District school board District 1 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate

Votes

|
|
|

✔ |

| Lala Chavez (Nonpartisan)  |

69.3

| 4,788

| Gwen Reyna (Nonpartisan)  |

30.7

| 2,125

* * *

Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source

| Total votes: 6,913

|
|

= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

# District 2[edit]

General election

##### General election for Lubbock Independent School District school board District 2

Incumbent Bill Stubblefield defeated Mary Ann Lawson in the general election for Lubbock Independent School District school board District 2 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate

Votes

|
|
|

✔ |

| Bill Stubblefield (Nonpartisan)  |

52.9

| 3,762

| Mary Ann Lawson (Nonpartisan)  |

47.1

| 3,347

* * *

Incumbents are bolded and underlined. The results have been certified. Source

| Total votes: 7,109

|
|

= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

# District 5[edit]

General election

The general election was canceled. Scot Mayfield (Nonpartisan) won without appearing on the ballot.

# Additional elections on the ballot[edit]

See also: Texas elections, 2020

What's on your ballot?

Click here to find out using My Vote

## What was at stake?[edit]

### Report a story for this election[edit]

Ballotpedia researches issues in school board elections across the United States, but information availability is a challenge for us in many school districts. Please contact us about the issues that impact your local school district. Note that not all submissions may meet Ballotpedia's coverage requirements for inclusion.

### Candidate survey[edit]

Ballotpedia invites school board candidates to participate in its annual survey.
Click here to view or fill out the survey.

|

## About the district[edit]

See also: Lubbock Independent School District, Texas

The Lubbock Independent School District is located in Lubbock County, Texas. The district served 27,998 students during the 2017-2018 school year.[3]

## Pivot Counties[edit]

See also: Pivot Counties by state

One of 254 Texas counties—0.4 percent—is a Pivot County. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.

Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008

County  | Trump margin of victory in 2016  | Obama margin of victory in 2012  | Obama margin of victory in 2008
Jefferson County, Texas | 0.48% | 1.61% | 2.25%

In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Texas with 52.2 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 43.2 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Texas cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 66.7 percent of the time. In that same time frame, Texas supported Democratic candidates slightly more often than Republicans, 53.3 to 46.7 percent. The state, however, favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.

#### Presidential results by legislative district[edit]

The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Texas. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[4][5]

In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 54 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 37.4 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 65 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 36.4 points. Clinton won 10 districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections.

In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 96 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 36.2 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 85 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 34.5 points.

2016 presidential results by state House district

District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control
1 | 26.82% | 72.17% | R+45.3 | 22.76% | 75.13% | R+52.4 | R
2 | 20.93% | 77.91% | R+57 | 17.59% | 79.78% | R+62.2 | R
3 | 22.26% | 76.65% | R+54.4 | 21.37% | 75.80% | R+54.4 | R
4 | 25.04% | 73.93% | R+48.9 | 22.70% | 74.70% | R+52 | R
5 | 23.75% | 75.33% | R+51.6 | 20.20% | 77.72% | R+57.5 | R
6 | 28.44% | 70.49% | R+42 | 28.89% | 67.98% | R+39.1 | R
7 | 27.14% | 71.97% | R+44.8 | 24.48% | 73.09% | R+48.6 | R
8 | 24.96% | 74.07% | R+49.1 | 21.12% | 76.63% | R+55.5 | R
9 | 27.47% | 71.73% | R+44.3 | 22.23% | 76.13% | R+53.9 | R
10 | 25.56% | 73.21% | R+47.7 | 25.20% | 71.62% | R+46.4 | R
11 | 26.75% | 72.23% | R+45.5 | 24.48% | 72.79% | R+48.3 | R
12 | 36.06% | 62.67% | R+26.6 | 32.54% | 64.35% | R+31.8 | R
13 | 22.71% | 76.25% | R+53.5 | 20.47% | 77.18% | R+56.7 | R
14 | 34.77% | 62.91% | R+28.1 | 38.79% | 54.03% | R+15.2 | R
15 | 21.79% | 76.77% | R+55 | 28.86% | 66.69% | R+37.8 | R
16 | 18.22% | 80.76% | R+62.5 | 18.80% | 78.35% | R+59.5 | R
17 | 37.30% | 60.79% | R+23.5 | 33.92% | 62.02% | R+28.1 | R
18 | 27.18% | 71.69% | R+44.5 | 23.96% | 73.47% | R+49.5 | R
19 | 22.22% | 76.79% | R+54.6 | 17.21% | 81.00% | R+63.8 | R
20 | 26.22% | 72.13% | R+45.9 | 25.81% | 70.27% | R+44.5 | R
21 | 23.92% | 74.97% | R+51.1 | 21.50% | 76.09% | R+54.6 | R
22 | 66.82% | 32.57% | D+34.3 | 65.95% | 31.80% | D+34.1 | D
23 | 44.24% | 54.56% | R+10.3 | 40.89% | 55.86% | R+15 | R
24 | 25.11% | 73.48% | R+48.4 | 27.42% | 68.20% | R+40.8 | R
25 | 28.74% | 69.92% | R+41.2 | 27.55% | 69.14% | R+41.6 | R
26 | 35.86% | 62.95% | R+27.1 | 45.81% | 50.71% | R+4.9 | R
27 | 68.80% | 30.44% | D+38.4 | 70.03% | 27.23% | D+42.8 | D
28 | 34.81% | 64.22% | R+29.4 | 43.01% | 53.21% | R+10.2 | R
29 | 35.44% | 63.32% | R+27.9 | 41.21% | 54.83% | R+13.6 | R
30 | 30.24% | 68.64% | R+38.4 | 26.80% | 70.36% | R+43.6 | R
31 | 61.89% | 37.31% | D+24.6 | 55.47% | 42.31% | D+13.2 | D
32 | 41.43% | 56.92% | R+15.5 | 42.04% | 53.45% | R+11.4 | R
33 | 26.49% | 72.25% | R+45.8 | 31.27% | 64.67% | R+33.4 | R
34 | 54.64% | 44.24% | D+10.4 | 53.40% | 43.18% | D+10.2 | D
35 | 66.43% | 32.71% | D+33.7 | 63.43% | 33.59% | D+29.8 | D
36 | 74.73% | 24.41% | D+50.3 | 73.70% | 23.21% | D+50.5 | D
37 | 69.28% | 29.75% | D+39.5 | 68.98% | 27.77% | D+41.2 | D
38 | 66.13% | 32.95% | D+33.2 | 65.76% | 30.74% | D+35 | D
39 | 74.02% | 25.10% | D+48.9 | 70.48% | 26.40% | D+44.1 | D
40 | 75.32% | 23.68% | D+51.6 | 70.73% | 25.91% | D+44.8 | D
41 | 56.64% | 42.35% | D+14.3 | 59.53% | 36.87% | D+22.7 | D
42 | 75.54% | 23.57% | D+52 | 73.73% | 23.49% | D+50.2 | D
43 | 46.96% | 52.09% | R+5.1 | 43.79% | 53.10% | R+9.3 | R
44 | 30.83% | 67.97% | R+37.1 | 30.22% | 65.99% | R+35.8 | R
45 | 41.83% | 55.19% | R+13.4 | 44.53% | 49.14% | R+4.6 | R
46 | 76.62% | 20.14% | D+56.5 | 78.16% | 16.34% | D+61.8 | D
47 | 39.32% | 58.05% | R+18.7 | 46.98% | 47.16% | R+0.2 | R
48 | 56.86% | 39.56% | D+17.3 | 65.17% | 28.12% | D+37 | D
49 | 70.19% | 24.89% | D+45.3 | 76.63% | 16.65% | D+60 | D
50 | 57.79% | 38.81% | D+19 | 63.38% | 30.05% | D+33.3 | D
51 | 78.49% | 17.43% | D+61.1 | 79.52% | 14.04% | D+65.5 | D
52 | 42.57% | 54.91% | R+12.3 | 46.12% | 47.56% | R+1.4 | R
53 | 22.29% | 76.50% | R+54.2 | 20.74% | 76.30% | R+55.6 | R
54 | 45.85% | 53.04% | R+7.2 | 44.07% | 51.07% | R+7 | R
55 | 33.08% | 65.48% | R+32.4 | 31.96% | 63.28% | R+31.3 | R
56 | 29.70% | 69.02% | R+39.3 | 31.16% | 64.82% | R+33.7 | R
57 | 25.97% | 73.09% | R+47.1 | 22.50% | 75.69% | R+53.2 | R
58 | 21.12% | 77.52% | R+56.4 | 18.84% | 77.90% | R+59.1 | R
59 | 21.36% | 77.31% | R+56 | 19.19% | 77.44% | R+58.2 | R
60 | 15.70% | 83.09% | R+67.4 | 13.33% | 84.19% | R+70.9 | R
61 | 16.19% | 82.54% | R+66.3 | 14.49% | 82.74% | R+68.3 | R
62 | 24.72% | 73.77% | R+49.1 | 20.89% | 76.05% | R+55.2 | R
63 | 26.39% | 72.13% | R+45.7 | 30.22% | 65.26% | R+35 | R
64 | 37.33% | 60.30% | R+23 | 40.00% | 54.49% | R+14.5 | R
65 | 40.84% | 57.52% | R+16.7 | 46.51% | 48.62% | R+2.1 | R
66 | 37.46% | 61.15% | R+23.7 | 46.24% | 49.45% | R+3.2 | R
67 | 37.26% | 61.08% | R+23.8 | 44.69% | 50.41% | R+5.7 | R
68 | 17.78% | 81.15% | R+63.4 | 14.23% | 83.37% | R+69.1 | R
69 | 23.27% | 75.20% | R+51.9 | 20.26% | 76.12% | R+55.9 | R
70 | 29.25% | 69.37% | R+40.1 | 32.82% | 62.78% | R+30 | R
71 | 22.84% | 75.76% | R+52.9 | 21.49% | 74.23% | R+52.7 | R
72 | 23.33% | 75.26% | R+51.9 | 21.45% | 74.81% | R+53.4 | R
73 | 20.22% | 78.37% | R+58.2 | 21.25% | 75.11% | R+53.9 | R
74 | 56.99% | 41.57% | D+15.4 | 56.27% | 39.58% | D+16.7 | D
75 | 72.33% | 26.62% | D+45.7 | 73.74% | 21.38% | D+52.4 | D
76 | 76.91% | 21.86% | D+55.1 | 77.93% | 17.86% | D+60.1 | D
77 | 64.07% | 34.29% | D+29.8 | 68.79% | 25.97% | D+42.8 | D
78 | 54.41% | 44.15% | D+10.3 | 59.28% | 35.16% | D+24.1 | D
79 | 64.73% | 34.12% | D+30.6 | 68.62% | 26.73% | D+41.9 | D
80 | 68.25% | 30.91% | D+37.3 | 65.06% | 32.31% | D+32.7 | D
81 | 24.20% | 74.66% | R+50.5 | 26.33% | 70.49% | R+44.2 | R
82 | 19.38% | 79.31% | R+59.9 | 20.58% | 75.76% | R+55.2 | R
83 | 21.27% | 77.50% | R+56.2 | 19.94% | 76.49% | R+56.5 | R
84 | 34.95% | 63.28% | R+28.3 | 35.12% | 59.58% | R+24.5 | R
85 | 37.99% | 61.03% | R+23 | 41.09% | 56.10% | R+15 | R
86 | 16.18% | 82.55% | R+66.4 | 16.16% | 80.17% | R+64 | R
87 | 22.12% | 76.56% | R+54.4 | 21.74% | 74.43% | R+52.7 | R
88 | 19.06% | 79.89% | R+60.8 | 16.48% | 80.59% | R+64.1 | R
89 | 31.79% | 66.67% | R+34.9 | 36.08% | 59.03% | R+23 | R
90 | 73.70% | 25.21% | D+48.5 | 74.97% | 21.48% | D+53.5 | D
91 | 30.45% | 67.90% | R+37.5 | 32.14% | 63.08% | R+30.9 | R
92 | 37.22% | 61.08% | R+23.9 | 40.54% | 54.66% | R+14.1 | R
93 | 38.26% | 60.21% | R+21.9 | 40.40% | 54.84% | R+14.4 | R
94 | 38.10% | 60.29% | R+22.2 | 40.87% | 54.30% | R+13.4 | R
95 | 76.11% | 22.99% | D+53.1 | 74.24% | 22.89% | D+51.4 | D
96 | 40.22% | 58.60% | R+18.4 | 42.55% | 53.74% | R+11.2 | R
97 | 38.92% | 59.59% | R+20.7 | 42.59% | 52.42% | R+9.8 | R
98 | 23.57% | 75.01% | R+51.4 | 28.91% | 66.33% | R+37.4 | R
99 | 30.70% | 67.69% | R+37 | 32.12% | 63.36% | R+31.2 | R
100 | 77.89% | 21.07% | D+56.8 | 77.24% | 19.30% | D+57.9 | D
101 | 64.01% | 34.87% | D+29.1 | 66.06% | 30.36% | D+35.7 | D
102 | 45.32% | 53.02% | R+7.7 | 52.27% | 42.74% | D+9.5 | R
103 | 69.87% | 28.77% | D+41.1 | 73.55% | 22.33% | D+51.2 | D
104 | 72.70% | 26.36% | D+46.3 | 75.60% | 20.85% | D+54.7 | D
105 | 46.48% | 52.14% | R+5.7 | 52.13% | 43.60% | D+8.5 | R
106 | 30.86% | 67.69% | R+36.8 | 35.83% | 59.70% | R+23.9 | R
107 | 46.89% | 51.83% | R+4.9 | 52.37% | 43.40% | D+9 | D
108 | 39.31% | 58.99% | R+19.7 | 50.32% | 44.01% | D+6.3 | R
109 | 81.75% | 17.68% | D+64.1 | 81.55% | 16.42% | D+65.1 | D
110 | 88.74% | 10.77% | D+78 | 86.76% | 11.25% | D+75.5 | D
111 | 77.24% | 22.06% | D+55.2 | 77.40% | 20.17% | D+57.2 | D
112 | 43.50% | 55.03% | R+11.5 | 48.28% | 47.10% | D+1.2 | R
113 | 46.31% | 52.53% | R+6.2 | 49.13% | 47.23% | D+1.9 | R
114 | 43.48% | 55.23% | R+11.7 | 52.14% | 43.21% | D+8.9 | R
115 | 43.23% | 55.27% | R+12 | 51.54% | 43.64% | D+7.9 | R
116 | 60.53% | 37.80% | D+22.7 | 63.73% | 31.10% | D+32.6 | D
117 | 51.99% | 46.85% | D+5.1 | 53.23% | 42.14% | D+11.1 | D
118 | 55.33% | 43.41% | D+11.9 | 55.58% | 40.41% | D+15.2 | D
119 | 60.26% | 38.58% | D+21.7 | 60.13% | 36.08% | D+24.1 | D
120 | 64.75% | 34.11% | D+30.6 | 63.51% | 32.10% | D+31.4 | D
121 | 37.61% | 60.88% | R+23.3 | 43.42% | 51.69% | R+8.3 | R
122 | 30.87% | 67.87% | R+37 | 37.75% | 57.87% | R+20.1 | R
123 | 61.36% | 36.80% | D+24.6 | 65.02% | 30.27% | D+34.7 | D
124 | 60.94% | 37.65% | D+23.3 | 62.19% | 33.04% | D+29.1 | D
125 | 59.11% | 39.59% | D+19.5 | 61.62% | 33.69% | D+27.9 | D
126 | 36.72% | 62.08% | R+25.4 | 43.00% | 52.94% | R+9.9 | R
127 | 29.60% | 69.21% | R+39.6 | 34.90% | 61.23% | R+26.3 | R
128 | 26.59% | 72.37% | R+45.8 | 28.77% | 68.15% | R+39.4 | R
129 | 33.88% | 64.47% | R+30.6 | 40.06% | 55.33% | R+15.3 | R
130 | 22.81% | 75.91% | R+53.1 | 27.96% | 68.06% | R+40.1 | R
131 | 83.65% | 15.69% | D+68 | 84.29% | 13.35% | D+70.9 | D
132 | 39.77% | 58.92% | R+19.2 | 45.68% | 50.04% | R+4.4 | R
133 | 30.41% | 68.14% | R+37.7 | 41.12% | 54.52% | R+13.4 | R
134 | 41.74% | 56.39% | R+14.7 | 55.09% | 39.61% | D+15.5 | R
135 | 39.86% | 58.83% | R+19 | 46.82% | 48.89% | R+2.1 | R
136 | 41.43% | 55.34% | R+13.9 | 47.69% | 45.16% | D+2.5 | R
137 | 63.91% | 34.49% | D+29.4 | 67.00% | 28.92% | D+38.1 | D
138 | 39.30% | 59.18% | R+19.9 | 47.85% | 47.78% | D+0.1 | R
139 | 75.62% | 23.61% | D+52 | 76.12% | 20.61% | D+55.5 | D
140 | 70.10% | 28.98% | D+41.1 | 75.09% | 21.87% | D+53.2 | D
141 | 87.41% | 12.07% | D+75.3 | 85.19% | 12.59% | D+72.6 | D
142 | 77.41% | 21.97% | D+55.4 | 76.20% | 20.97% | D+55.2 | D
143 | 67.18% | 31.86% | D+35.3 | 71.02% | 26.02% | D+45 | D
144 | 50.77% | 47.88% | D+2.9 | 57.75% | 38.37% | D+19.4 | D
145 | 60.26% | 38.28% | D+22 | 66.92% | 28.72% | D+38.2 | D
146 | 78.82% | 20.05% | D+58.8 | 79.43% | 17.32% | D+62.1 | D
147 | 78.07% | 20.30% | D+57.8 | 78.99% | 16.78% | D+62.2 | D
148 | 56.59% | 41.08% | D+15.5 | 63.82% | 30.50% | D+33.3 | D
149 | 58.76% | 40.12% | D+18.6 | 64.25% | 32.50% | D+31.8 | D
150 | 30.28% | 68.55% | R+38.3 | 36.63% | 59.18% | R+22.6 | R
Total | 41.40% | 57.19% | R+15.8 | 43.48% | 52.53% | R+9.1 | \-
Source: Daily Kos

## See also[edit]

Lubbock Independent School District | Texas | School Boards

|
|

* Lubbock Independent School District elections (2018)

* List of school districts in Texas

* Texas school board elections, 2020
* Public education in Texas
* Local ballot measures, Texas

* School board elections, 2020
* School board elections, 2019

## External links[edit]

* Search Google News for this topic
* Lubbock Independent School District

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ Lubbock ISD, "ORDER BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE POSTPONEMENT OF ITS GENERAL TRUSTEE ELECTION TO BE HELD WITHIN SAID DISTRICT," accessed April 14, 2020
2. ↑ Office of the Texas Governor, "Governor Abbott Issues Proclamation Allowing For Postponement Of Local Elections Set For May 2nd," March 18, 2020
3. ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey Data," accessed January 28, 2020
4. ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
5. ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017

v • e

School districts in the United States

By state|

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Elections|

2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013
School board recalls

Lists|

Largest school districts in the United States by enrollment • List of school districts in the United States • Glossary of education terms • Analysis of spending in America's largest school districts • Education influencers • United States school shootings, 1990-present • School board salaries in America's largest school districts

State
agencies|

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

v • e

Ballotpedia

About|

Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities

* * *

Executive: Leslie Graves, President • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officer • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy

Communications: Megan Brown • Sarah Groat • Lauren Nemerovski
External Relations: Alison Prange • Sara Key • Kari Berger • Hannah Nelson
Operations: Meghann Olshefski • Lauren Dixon • Kelly Rindfleisch
Policy: Christopher Nelson • Caitlin Styrsky • Molly Byrne • Katharine Frey • Jimmy McAllister
Research: Josh Altic, Managing Editor
Tech: Matt Latourelle, Tech Manager • Nathan Bingham • Ryan Burch • Kirsten Corrao • Margaret Kearney • Joseph Sanchez

Contributors: Scott Rasmussen

* * *

Editorial|

Geoff Pallay, Editor-in-Chief • Daniel Anderson, Managing Editor • Ryan Byrne, Managing Editor • Cory Eucalitto, Managing Editor • Mandy Gillip, Managing Editor • Jerrick Adams • Victoria Antram • Dave Beaudoin • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Kate Carsella • Kelly Coyle • Megan Feeney • Nicole Fisher • Juan García de Paredes • Sara Horton • Tyler King • Doug Kronaizl • Amee LaTour • David Luchs • Brittony Maag • Roneka Matheny • Andrew McNair • Jackie Mitchell • Elisabeth Moore • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Murphy • Samantha Post • Paul Rader • Ethan Rice • Myj Saintyl • Maddie Sinclair Johnson • Abbey Smith • Janie Valentine • Caitlin Vanden Boom • Joel Williams • Samuel Wonacott • Mercedes Yanora

v • e

State of Texas
Austin (capital)

|

Elections |

What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2022 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures

Government |

Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy