North Dakota Judicial Nominating Committee

Judicial nominating commissions

Individual nominating committees
Select a committee in the dropdown below and click "Submit" to view information about that committee.

Alaska Judicial CouncilArizona Commission on Appellate Court AppointmentsArizona Commission on Judicial Performance ReviewArizona Judicial Nominating CommissionsCalifornia Commission on Judicial AppointmentsColorado Supreme Court Nominating CommissionConnecticut Judicial Selection CommissionDelaware Judicial Nominating CommissionDistrict of Columbia Judicial Nomination CommissionFlorida Supreme Court Judicial Nominating CommissionGeorgia Judicial Nominating CommissionHawaii Judicial Selection CommissionIndiana Judicial Nominating CommissionIowa Judicial Nominating CommissionKansas Supreme Court Nominating CommissionKentucky Judicial Nominating CommissionMaryland Appellate Courts Judicial Nominating CommissionMinnesota Commission on Judicial SelectionMissouri Appellate Judicial CommissionMontana Judicial Nominating CommissionNebraska Judicial Nominating CommissionsNevada Commission on Judicial SelectionNew Hampshire Judicial Selection CommissionState of New York Commission on Judicial NominationNorth Dakota Judicial Nominating CommitteeOklahoma Judicial Nominating CommissionRhode Island Judicial Nominating CommissionSouth Carolina Judicial Merit Selection CommissionSouth Dakota Judicial Qualifications CommissionTennessee Governor's Council for Judicial AppointmentsUtah Judicial Performance Evaluation CommissionUtah Appellate Judicial Nominating CommissionVermont Judicial Nominating BoardWest Virginia Judicial Vacancy Advisory CommissionWyoming Judicial Nominating CommissionSubmit

Methods of judicial selection
Partisan elections
Nonpartisan elections
Michigan method
Retention elections
Assisted appointment
Bar-controlled commission
Governor-controlled commission
Hybrid commission
Legislative elections
Gubernatorial appointment

## Contents

* 1 Members
* 2 Process
* 3 Duties
* 4 Control of judicial selection commissions
* 5 About judicial selection
* 6 See also
* 7 External links
* 8 Footnotes

The North Dakota Judicial Nominating Committee is an independent state commission in North Dakota established by the North Dakota Century Code that plays a role in the state's judicial selection process.[1] The committee has six members, selected by the governor, the state Bar association, and the chief justice of the state supreme court.

North Dakota uses the assisted appointment method of judicial selection for vacancies in its state courts. Using this method, the governor appoints state judges from a list of names submitted by the committee.

The committee is a hybrid commission, which means that there is no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state Bar association. As of October 22, 2025, 11 states used this type of commission. To learn more about controlling majorities in judicial selection commissions, click here.

## Members[edit]

Last updated: April 2025

The committee has six permanent members who serve three-year terms. Terms are staggered and committee members are limited to serving two terms. The six permanent members are appointed as follows: two by the chief justice of the North Dakota Supreme Court, two by the president of the State Bar Association of North Dakota, and two by the governor.[2] One of the two appointees to the committee must be a judge, former judge, or lawyer licensed to practice law in the state, and the other must be a layperson. The North Dakota State Bar Association's executive director serves as the committee's nonvoting secretary.[1]

The members of the committee cannot be appointed to fill a judicial vacancy while they serve on the committee. Additionally, members receive no salary, but they are to be reimbursed for travel and other expenses related to committee work.[1]

Members of the North Dakota Judicial Nominating Committee, April 2025

Name  | Appointed by  | Term-end date
Eric Lahlum | Governor | June 30, 2026
Paul Forster | Governor | June 30, 2025
Taylor Olson | North Dakota Bar Association | June 30, 2027
Toby Kommer | North Dakota Bar Association | June 30, 2026
Laura Mihalik | Chief Justice | June 30, 2025
Jerod Tufte | Chief Justice | June 30, 2026
Tony Weiler | Statutory | N/A

## Process[edit]

The committee's process is defined in state statutes.[1]

1. The committee solicits candidates to apply to vacancies on the court.
2. The committee evaluates each applicant.
3. Within 60 days of notice of the vacancy, the committee must submit a shortlist to the governor for consideration.
4. Within 30 days of receiving the shortlist, the governor must select an appointee from the list or request a new list from the committee.

## Duties[edit]

As of April 2025, state statutes did not list specific duties for members of the committee.

## Control of judicial selection commissions[edit]

Assisted appointment is a method of judicial selection in which a nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[3]

At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types, based on the makeup of the judicial nominating commissions. Those types are:

* Governor-controlled commission \- The governor is either responsible for appointing a majority of the members of the nominating commission or may decline to appoint a candidate from a list provided by the nominating commission.
* Bar-controlled commission \- Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the members of the nominating commission.
* Hybrid \- There is no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state Bar Association. The membership of these commissions is determined by different rules in each state.

Twenty-three courts in 22 states used assisted appointment to select state supreme court justices as of June 2021.[4][5] North Dakota used a hybrid commission. The table below shows the number of courts using each variation of assisted appointment at the state supreme court level.

Assisted appointment methods in state supreme courts

Method  | Courts (of 23)
Governor-controlled majority | 10
Bar-controlled majority | 1
Hybrid | 12

The map below highlights the states that use each of the three types of assisted appointment.

## About judicial selection[edit]

Each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they select judges at the state and local level. These methods of selection are:

Election

* Partisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot alongside a label designating political party affiliation.
* Nonpartisan election: Judges are elected by the people, and candidates are listed on the ballot without a label designating party affiliation.
* Michigan method: State supreme court justices are selected through nonpartisan elections preceded by either partisan primaries or conventions.
* Retention election: A periodic process whereby voters are asked whether an incumbent judge should remain in office for another term. Judges are not selected for initial terms in office using this election method.

Assisted appointment

* Assisted appointment, also known as merit selection or the Missouri Plan: A nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list.[3] At the state supreme court level, this method is further divided into the following three types:
* Bar-controlled commission: Members of the state Bar Association are responsible for electing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees that they must choose from.
* Governor-controlled commission: The governor is responsible for appointing a majority of the judicial nominating commission that sends the governor a list of nominees they must choose from.
* Hybrid commission: The judicial nominating commission has no majority of members chosen by either the governor or the state bar association. These commissions determine membership in a variety of ways, but no institution or organization has a clear majority control.

Direct appointment

* Court appointment: Judges are selected by judges in the state judiciary.
* Gubernatorial appointment: Judges are appointed by the governor. In some cases, approval from the legislative body is required.
* Legislative election: Judges are selected by the state legislature.
* Municipal government selection: Judges are selected by the governing body of their municipality.

Click a state on the map below to explore judicial selection processes in that state.

Choose your state...AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington, D.C.West VirginiaWisconsinWyoming

http://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_STATE

## See also[edit]

State courts | Appointment methods | Election methods

|
|

State supreme courts Intermediate appellate courts Trial courts |  Assisted appointment Court appointment Gubernatorial appointment Legislative election Municipal government selection |  Partisan election Nonpartisan election Michigan method

## External links[edit]

* State Bar Association of North Dakota

## Footnotes[edit]

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 North Dakota State Legislature, "N.D.C.C. Chapter 27-25. Judicial Nominating Committee," accessed November 12, 2021
2. ↑ Governor of North Dakota, "Boards and Committees," accessed April 9, 2025
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 American Bar Association, "Judicial Selection: The Process of Choosing Judges," June 2008 Cite error: Invalid `<ref>` tag; name "ambaroverview" defined multiple times with different content
4. ↑ As of June 2021, Oklahoma had two state supreme courts: one for civil matters and one for criminal matters.
5. ↑ North Dakota uses this method only for vacancies.

v • e

Judicial selection in state courts

Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • District of Columbia • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

* * *

2025 election • 2024 election • 2023 election • 2022 election • 2021 election • 2020 election • 2019 election • 2018 election • 2017 election • 2016 election • 2015 election • 2014 election • 2013 election • 2012 election • 2011 election • 2010 election • 2009 election • 2008 election

* * *

Commission selection, political appointment • Gubernatorial appointment • Legislative appointment • Partisan elections • Nonpartisan elections • Retention election

* * *

How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts • How vacancies are filled in state intermediate appellate courts

North Dakota courts

* * *

Federal courts:

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: District of North Dakota • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of North Dakota

State courts:

North Dakota Supreme Court • North Dakota Court of Appeals • North Dakota District Courts • North Dakota Municipal Courts

State resources:

Courts in North Dakota • North Dakota judicial elections • Judicial selection in North Dakota