Spin–statistics theorem

Short description: Theorem in quantum mechanics

Statistical mechanics

* Thermodynamics
* Kinetic theory

Particle statistics

* Spin–statistics theorem
* Identical particles
* Maxwell–Boltzmann
* Bose–Einstein
* Fermi–Dirac
* Parastatistics
* Anyonic statistics
* Braid statistics

Thermodynamic ensembles

* NVE Microcanonical
* NVT Canonical
* µVT Grand canonical
* NPH Isoenthalpic–isobaric
* NPT Isothermal–isobaric

Models

* Debye
* Einstein
* Ising
* Potts

Potentials

* Internal energy
* Enthalpy
* Helmholtz free energy
* Gibbs free energy
* Grand potential / Landau free energy

Scientists

* Maxwell
* Boltzmann
* Gibbs
* Einstein
* Ehrenfest
* von Neumann
* Tolman
* Debye
* Fermi
* Bose

* v
* t
* e

The spin–statistics theorem proves that the observed relationship between the intrinsic spin of a particle (angular momentum not due to the orbital motion) and the quantum particle statistics of collections of such particles is a consequence of the mathematics of quantum mechanics.

According to the theorem, the many-body wave function for elementary particles with integer spin (bosons) is symmetric under the exchange of any two particles, whereas for particles with half-integer spin (fermions), the wave function is antisymmetric under such an exchange. A consequence of the theorem is that non-interacting particles with integer spin obey Bose–Einstein statistics, while those with half-integer spin obey Fermi–Dirac statistics.[1][2][3]

## Contents

* 1 Background
* 1.1 Quantum states and indistinguishable particles
* 1.2 Exchange symmetry or permutation symmetry
* 2 Proofs
* 3 Experimental tests
* 4 Relation to representation theory of the Lorentz group
* 5 Composite particles
* 6 Quasiparticle anyons in 2 dimensions
* 7 See also
* 8 References
* 9 Further reading
* 10 External links

## Background

The statistics of indistinguishable particles is among the most fundamental of physical effects. The Pauli exclusion principle - that every occupied quantum state contains at most one fermion - controls the formation of matter. The basic building blocks of matter such as protons, neutrons, and electrons are all fermions. Conversely, photon and other particles which mediate forces between matter particles, are bosons. A spin–statistics theorem attempts to explain the origin of this fundamental dichotomy.[4]: 4

Naively, spin, an angular momentum property intrinsic to a particle, would be unrelated to fundamental properties of a collection of such particles. However, these are indistinguishable particles: any physical prediction relating multiple indistinguishable particles must not change when the particles are exchanged. [citation needed]

### Quantum states and indistinguishable particles

In a quantum system, a physical state is described by a state vector. A pair of distinct state vectors are physically equivalent if they differ only by an overall phase factor, ignoring other interactions. A pair of indistinguishable particles such as this have only one state. This means that if the positions of the particles are exchanged (i.e., they undergo a permutation), this does not identify a new physical state, but rather one matching the original physical state. In fact, one cannot tell which particle is in which position. [citation needed]

While the physical state does not change under the exchange of the particles' positions, it is possible for the state vector to change sign as a result of an exchange. Since this sign change is just an overall phase, this does not affect the physical state. [citation needed]

The essential ingredient in proving the spin-statistics relation is relativity, that the physical laws do not change under Lorentz transformations. The field operators transform under Lorentz transformations according to the spin of the particle that they create, by definition. [citation needed]

Additionally, the assumption (known as microcausality) that spacelike-separated fields either commute or anticommute can be made only for relativistic theories with a time direction. Otherwise, the notion of being spacelike is meaningless. However, the proof involves looking at a Euclidean version of spacetime, in which the time direction is treated as a spatial one, as will be now explained. [citation needed]

Lorentz transformations include 3-dimensional rotations and boosts. A boost transfers to a frame of reference with a different velocity and is mathematically like a rotation into time. By analytic continuation of the correlation functions of a quantum field theory, the time coordinate may become imaginary, and then boosts become rotations. The new "spacetime" has only spatial directions and is termed Euclidean. [citation needed]

### Exchange symmetry or permutation symmetry

Bosons are particles whose wavefunction is symmetric under such an exchange or permutation, so if we swap the particles, the wavefunction does not change. Fermions are particles whose wavefunction is antisymmetric, so under such a swap the wavefunction gets a minus sign, meaning that the amplitude for two identical fermions to occupy the same state must be zero. This is the Pauli exclusion principle: two identical fermions cannot occupy the same state. This rule does not hold for bosons. [citation needed]

In quantum field theory, a state or a wavefunction is described by field operators operating on some basic state called the vacuum. In order for the operators to project out the symmetric or antisymmetric component of the creating wavefunction, they must have the appropriate commutation law. The operator

∬ψ(x,y)ϕ(x)ϕ(y)dxdy

(with ϕ an operator and ψ(x,y) a numerical function with complex values) creates a two-particle state with wavefunction ψ(x,y), and depending on the commutation properties of the fields, either only the antisymmetric parts or the symmetric parts matter.

Let us assume that x≠y and the two operators take place at the same time; more generally, they may have spacelike separation, as is explained hereafter.

If the fields commute, meaning that the following holds:

ϕ(x)ϕ(y)=ϕ(y)ϕ(x),

then only the symmetric part of ψ contributes, so that ψ(x,y)=ψ(y,x), and the field will create bosonic particles.

On the other hand, if the fields anti-commute, meaning that ϕ has the property that

ϕ(x)ϕ(y)=−ϕ(y)ϕ(x),

then only the antisymmetric part of ψ contributes, so that ψ(x,y)=−ψ(y,x), and the particles will be fermionic.

## Proofs

An elementary explanation for the spin–statistics theorem cannot be given despite the fact that the theorem is so simple to state. In The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Richard Feynman said that this probably means that we do not have a complete understanding of the fundamental principle involved.[5]

Numerous notable proofs have been published, with different kinds of limitations and assumptions. They are all "negative proofs", meaning that they establish that integer spin fields cannot result in fermion statistics while half-integral spin fields cannot result in boson statistics.[4]: 487

Proofs that avoid using any relativistic quantum field theory mechanism have defects. Many such proofs rely on a claim that |ψ(α1,α2,α3,…)|2=|P^ψ(α1,α2,α3,…)|2, where the operator P^ permutes the coordinates. However, the value on the left-hand side represents the probability of particle 1 at r1, particle 2 at r2, and so on, and is thus quantum-mechanically invalid for indistinguishable particles.[6]: 567

The first proof was formulated[7] in 1939 by Markus Fierz, a student of Wolfgang Pauli, and was rederived in a more systematic way by Pauli the following year.[8] In a later summary, Pauli listed three postulates within relativistic quantum field theory as required for these versions of the theorem:

1. Any state with particle occupation has higher energy than the vacuum state.
2. Spatially separated measurements do not disturb each other (they commute).
3. Physical probabilities are positive (the metric of the Hilbert space is positive-definite).

Their analysis neglected particle interactions other than commutation/anti-commutation of the state.[9][4]: 374

In 1949 Richard Feynman gave a completely different type of proof[10] based on vacuum polarization, which was later critiqued by Pauli.[9][4]: 368 Pauli showed that Feynman's proof explicitly relied on the first two postulates he used and implicitly used the third one by first allowing negative probabilities but then rejecting field theory results with probabilities greater than one.

A proof by Julian Schwinger in 1950 based on time-reversal invariance[11] followed a proof by Frederik Belinfante in 1940 based on charge-conjugation invariance, leading to a connection to the CPT theorem more fully developed by Pauli in 1955.[12] These proofs were notably difficult to follow.[4]: 393

Work on the axiomatization of quantum field theory by Arthur Wightman led to a theorem that stated that the expectation value of the product of two fields, ϕ(x)ϕ(y), could be analytically continued to all separations (x−y).[4]: 425 (The first two postulates of the Pauli-era proofs involve the vacuum state and fields at separate locations.) The new result allowed more rigorous proofs of the spin–statistics theorems by Gerhart Lüders and Bruno Zumino[13] and by Peter Burgoyne.[4]: 393 In 1957 Res Jost derived the CPT theorem using the spin–statistics theorem, and Burgoyne's proof of the spin–statistics theorem in 1958 required no constraints on the interactions nor on the form of the field theories. These results are among the most rigorous practical theorems.[14]: 529

In spite of these successes, Feynman, in his 1963 undergraduate lecture that discussed the spin–statistics connection, says: "We apologize for the fact that we cannot give you an elementary explanation."[5] Neuenschwander echoed this in 1994, asking whether there was any progress,[15] spurring additional proofs and books.[4] Neuenschwander's 2013 popularization of the spin–statistics connection suggested that simple explanations remain elusive.[16]

## Experimental tests

In 1987 Greenberg and Mohapatra proposed that the spin–statistics theorem could have small violations.[17][18] With the help of very precise calculations for states of the He atom that violate the Pauli exclusion principle,[19] Deilamian, Gillaspy and Kelleher[20] looked for the 1s2s 1S0 state of He using an atomic-beam spectrometer. The search was unsuccessful with an upper limit of 5×10−6.

## Relation to representation theory of the Lorentz group

The Lorentz group has no non-trivial unitary representations of finite dimension. Thus it seems impossible to construct a Hilbert space in which all states have finite, non-zero spin and positive, Lorentz-invariant norm. This problem is overcome in different ways depending on particle spin–statistics. [citation needed]

For a state of integer spin the negative norm states (known as "unphysical polarization") are set to zero, which makes the use of gauge symmetry necessary. [citation needed]

For a state of half-integer spin the argument can be circumvented by having fermionic statistics.[21]

## Composite particles

The spin–statistics theorem applies not only to elementary particles but also to composite particles formed from them, provided that the internal structure of the composites is identical and they remain bound under the conditions being considered. One can consider the many-body wave function for the composite particles. If all the constituent elementary particles in one composite are simultaneously exchanged with those in another, the resulting sign change of the wave function is determined by the number of fermions within each composite. In such systems, the total spin of the composite particle arises from the quantum mechanical addition of the angular momenta of its constituents: if the number of constituent fermions is even, the composite has integer spin and behaves as a boson with a symmetric wave function; if the number is odd, the spin is half-integer and the composite behaves as a fermion with an antisymmetric wave function.[22] This result has been called the Ehrenfest-Oppenheimer theorem.[23]

Hadrons are composite subatomic particles made of quarks bound together by the strong interaction. Quarks are fermions with spin of 1/2. Hadrons fall into two main categories: baryons, which consist of an odd number of quarks (typically three), and mesons, which consist of an even number of quarks (typically a quark and an antiquark). Baryons, such as protons and neutrons, are fermions due to their odd number of constituent quarks. Mesons, like pions, are bosons because they contain an even number of quarks.[24]

The effect that quantum statistics have on composite particles is evident in the superfluid properties of the two helium isotopes, helium-3 and helium-4. In neutral atoms, each proton is always matched by one electron, so that the total number of protons plus electrons is always even. Therefore, an atom behaves as a fermion if it contains an odd number of neutrons, and as a boson if the number of neutrons is even. Helium-3 has one neutron and is a fermion, while helium-4 has two neutrons and is a boson. At a temperature of 2.17 K, helium-4 undergoes a phase transition to a superfluid state that can be understood as a type of Bose–Einstein condensate. Such a mechanism is not directly available for the fermionic helium-3, which remains a normal liquid to much lower temperatures. Below 2.6 mK, helium-3 also transitions into a superfluid state. This is achieved by a mechanism similar to superconductivity: the interactions between helium-3 atoms first bind the atoms into Cooper pairs, which are again bosonic, and the pairs can then undergo Bose-Einstein condensation.[25][22]

Although composite bosons exhibit similar behavior as elementary bosons, the fermionic nature of their constituents sometimes introduces subtle effects due to the Pauli exclusion principle. These effects limit how closely the composite bosons can be packed, and are especially significant in dense systems. They are sometimes modelled as effective interactions between composites.[26]

## Quasiparticle anyons in 2 dimensions

Main article: Anyon

In 1982, physicist Frank Wilczek published a research paper on the possibilities of possible fractional-spin particles, which he termed anyons from their ability to take on "any" spin.[27] He wrote that they were theoretically predicted to arise in low-dimensional systems where motion is restricted to fewer than three spatial dimensions. Wilczek described their spin statistics as "interpolating continuously between the usual boson and fermion cases".[27] The effect has become the basis for understanding the fractional quantum Hall effect.[28][29]

## See also

* Anyonic statistics
* Braid statistics
* Parastatistics

## References

1. ↑ Leggett, Anthony J. (2006). Quantum liquids: Bose condensation and Cooper pairing in condensed-matter systems. Oxford graduate texts. Oxford University Press. pp. 5,8–10. ISBN 978-0-19-171195-4.
2. ↑ Dirac, Paul Adrien Maurice (1981-01-01) (in en). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon Press. p. 149. ISBN 9780198520115. https://books.google.com/books?id=XehUpGiM6FIC.
3. ↑ Pauli, Wolfgang (1980-01-01) (in en). General principles of quantum mechanics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 9783540098423. https://books.google.com/books?id=A84NAQAAIAAJ.
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Duck, Ian; Sudarshan, Ennackel Chandy George; Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1998). Pauli and the spin-statistics theorem (1. reprint ed.). Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-3114-9.
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Feynman, Richard P.; Robert B. Leighton; Matthew Sands (1965). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. 3. Addison-Wesley. pp. 4.1. ISBN 978-0-201-02118-9. https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/III_04.html.
6. ↑ Curceanu, Catalina; Gillaspy, J. D.; Hilborn, Robert C. (2012-07-01). "Resource Letter SS–1: The Spin-Statistics Connection" (in en). American Journal of Physics 80 (7): 561–577. doi:10.1119/1.4704899. ISSN 0002-9505. Bibcode: 2012AmJPh..80..561C. https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/80/7/561/1039586/Resource-Letter-SS-1-The-Spin-Statistics.
7. ↑ Markus Fierz (1939). "Über die relativistische Theorie kräftefreier Teilchen mit beliebigem Spin". Helvetica Physica Acta 12 (1): 3–37. doi:10.5169/seals-110930. Bibcode: 1939AcHPh..12....3F.
8. ↑ Wolfgang Pauli (15 October 1940). "The Connection Between Spin and Statistics". Physical Review 58 (8): 716–722. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.58.716. Bibcode: 1940PhRv...58..716P.
9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Wolfgang Pauli (1950). "On the Connection Between Spin and Statistics". Progress of Theoretical Physics 5 (4): 526–543. doi:10.1143/ptp/5.4.526. Bibcode: 1950PThPh...5..526P.
10. ↑ Richard Feynman (1961). "The theory of positrons". Quantum Electrodynamics. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-201-36075-2. A reprint of Feynman's 1949 paper in Physical Review.
11. ↑ Julian Schwinger (June 15, 1951). "The Quantum Theory of Fields I". Physical Review 82 (6): 914–917. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.82.914. Bibcode: 1951PhRv...82..914S.
12. ↑ Pauli, Wolfgang (1988). "Exclusion Principle, Lorentz Group and Reflection of Space-Time and Charge". in Enz, Charles P. (in de). Wolfgang Pauli. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. pp. 459–479. doi:10.1007/978-3-322-90270-2_41. ISBN 978-3-322-90271-9. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-322-90270-2_41.
13. ↑ Lüders, Gerhart; Zumino, Bruno (1958-06-15). "Connection between Spin and Statistics" (in en). Physical Review 110 (6): 1450–1453. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.110.1450. ISSN 0031-899X. Bibcode: 1958PhRv..110.1450L. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.110.1450.
14. ↑ Pais, Abraham (2002). Inward bound: of matter and forces in the physical world (Reprint ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press [u.a.]. ISBN 978-0-19-851997-3.
15. ↑ Neuenschwander, Dwight E. (1994-11-01). "Question #7. The spin–statistics theorem" (in en). American Journal of Physics 62 (11): 972. doi:10.1119/1.17652. ISSN 0002-9505. Bibcode: 1994AmJPh..62..972N. https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/62/11/972/1040578/Question-7-The-spin-statistics-theorem.
16. ↑ Neuenschwander, Dwight E. (2015-07-28). "The Spin-Statistics Theorem and Identical Particle Distribution Functions" (in en). Radiations: 27. https://www.sigmapisigma.org/sigmapisigma/radiations/fall/2013/spin-statistics-theorem-and-identical-particle-distribution-functions.
17. ↑ Greenberg, O. W.; Mohapatra, R. N. (1987-11-30). "Local Quantum Field Theory of Possible Violation of the Pauli Principle" (in en). Physical Review Letters 59 (22): 2507–2510. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2507. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 10035570. Bibcode: 1987PhRvL..59.2507G. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2507.
18. ↑ Hilborn, Robert C. (1995-04-01). "Answer to Question #7 ["The spin-statistics theorem", Dwight E. Neuenschwander, Am. J. Phys. 62 (11), 972 (1994)"] (in en). American Journal of Physics 63 (4): 298–299. doi:10.1119/1.17953. ISSN 0002-9505. Bibcode: 1995AmJPh..63..298H. https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/63/4/298/1043301/Answer-to-Question-7-The-spin-statistics-theorem.
19. ↑ Drake, G. W. F. (1989). "Predicted energy shifts for "paronic" Helium". Phys. Rev. A 39 (2): 897–899. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.39.897. PMID 9901315. Bibcode: 1989PhRvA..39..897D. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/physicspub/85.
20. ↑ Deilamian, K. (1995). "Search for small violations of the symmetrization postulate in an excited state of Helium". Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (24): 4787–4790. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4787. PMID 10058599. Bibcode: 1995PhRvL..74.4787D.
21. ↑ Peskin, Michael E.; Schroeder, Daniel V. (1995). An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-50397-2. https://archive.org/details/introductiontoqu0000pesk.
22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 Leggett, A.J.; Javan, R. (2005-01-01), Bassani, Franco; Liedl, Gerald L.; Wyder, Peter, eds. (in en), Quantum Mechanics: Foundations, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 99–108, doi:10.1016/B0-12-369401-9/00616-1, ISBN 978-0-12-369401-0, https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369401-9/00616-1, retrieved 2023-03-13
23. ↑ Curceanu, Catalina; Gillaspy, J. D.; Hilborn, Robert C. (2012-07-01). "Resource Letter SS–1: The Spin-Statistics Connection". American Journal of Physics 80 (7): 561–577. doi:10.1119/1.4704899. ISSN 0002-9505. https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/80/7/561/1039586/Resource-Letter-SS-1-The-Spin-Statistics. Retrieved 2026-01-20.
24. ↑ Amsler, C. (2008). "Quark Model". Physics Letters B. Review of Particle Physics 667 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018. Bibcode: 2008PhLB..667....1A. http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/reviews/quarkmodrpp.pdf.
25. ↑ Leggett, Anthony J. (2006). Quantum liquids: Bose condensation and Cooper pairing in condensed-matter systems. Oxford graduate texts. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–8. ISBN 978-0-19-171195-4.
26. ↑ Combescot, Monique; Combescot, Roland; Dubin, François (2017-06-01). "Bose–Einstein condensation and indirect excitons: a review". Reports on Progress in Physics 80 (6): 066501. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa50e3. ISSN 0034-4885. PMID 28355164. Bibcode: 2017RPPh...80f6501C.
27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 "Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles". Physical Review Letters 49 (14): 957–959. 4 October 1982. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.957. Bibcode: 1982PhRvL..49..957W. http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~mtamash/f689_mecquant_i/prl49_957.pdf.
28. ↑ Laughlin, R. B. (1999-07-01). "Nobel Lecture: Fractional quantization" (in en). Reviews of Modern Physics 71 (4): 863–874. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.863. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 1999RvMP...71..863L. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.863.
29. ↑ Murthy, Ganpathy; Shankar, R. (2003-10-03). "Hamiltonian theories of the fractional quantum Hall effect" (in en). Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (4): 1101–1158. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1101. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2003RvMP...75.1101M. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1101.

## Further reading

* Duck, Ian; Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1998). "Toward an understanding of the spin–statistics theorem". American Journal of Physics 66 (4): 284–303. doi:10.1119/1.18860. Bibcode: 1998AmJPh..66..284D.
* Streater, Ray F.; Wightman, Arthur S. (2000). PCT, Spin & Statistics, and All That (5th ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07062-8.
* Jabs, Arthur (2010). "Connecting spin and statistics in quantum mechanics". Foundations of Physics 40 (7): 776–792. doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9351-4. Bibcode: 2010FoPh...40..776J.

## External links

* A nice nearly-proof at John Baez's home page
* Animation of the Dirac belt trick with a double belt, showing that belts behave as spin 1/2 particles
* Animation of a Dirac belt trick variant showing that spin 1/2 particles are fermions

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin–statistics theorem. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Physics:Spin–statistics_theorem&oldid=4335944"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template