Hot spot effect in subatomic physics

This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. Please help us clarify the article. There is a discussion about this on Talk:Hot spot effect in subatomic physics § Largely incomprehensible. (April 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

|

Hot spots in subatomic physics are regions of high energy density or temperature in hadronic or nuclear matter.

## Contents

* 1 Finite size effects
* 2 Statistical methods in subatomic physics
* 3 Hot spots in nucleons
* 3.1 Hot spots in nuclei
* 4 Hot spots and solitons
* 5 References

## Finite size effects

Hot spots are a manifestation of the finite size of the system: in subatomic physics this refers both to atomic nuclei, which consist of nucleons, as well as to nucleons themselves, which are made of quarks and gluons, Other manifestations of finite sizes of these systems are seen in scattering of electrons on nuclei and nucleons. For nuclei in particular finite size effects manifest themselves also in the isomeric shift and isotopic shift.

## Statistical methods in subatomic physics

The formation of hot spots assumes the establishment of local equilibrium, which in its turn occurs if the thermal conductivity in the medium is sufficiently small. The notions of equilibrium and heat are statistical. The use of statistical methods assumes a large number of degrees of freedom. In macroscopic physics this number usually refers to the number of atoms or molecules, while in nuclear and particle physics it refers to the energy level density.[1]

## Hot spots in nucleons

Local equilibrium is the precursor of global equilibrium and the hot spot effect can be used to determine how fast, if at all, the transition from local to global equilibrium takes place. That this transition does not always happen follows from the fact that the duration of a strong interaction reaction is quite short (of the order of 10−22–10−23 seconds) and the propagation of "heat", i.e. of the excitation, through the finite sized body of the system takes a finite time, which is determined by the thermal conductivity of the matter the system is made of. Indications of the transition between local and global equilibrium in strong interaction particle physics started to emerge in the 1960s and early 1970s. In high-energy strong interactions equilibrium is usually not complete. In these reactions, with the increase of laboratory energy one observes that the transverse momenta of produced particles have a tail, which deviates from the single exponential Boltzmann spectrum, characteristic for global equilibrium. The slope or the effective temperature of this transverse momentum tail increases with increasing energy. These large transverse momenta were interpreted as being due to particles, which "leak" out before equilibrium is reached. Similar observations had been made in nuclear reactions and were also attributed to pre-equilibrium effects. This interpretation suggested that the equilibrium is neither instantaneous, nor global, but rather local in space and time. By predicting a specific asymmetry in peripheral high-energy hadron reactions based on the hot spot effect Richard M. Weiner[2] proposed a direct test of this hypothesis as well as of the assumption that the heat conductivity in hadronic matter is relatively small. The theoretical analysis of the hot spot effect in terms of propagation of heat was performed in Ref.[3]

In high-energy hadron reactions one distinguishes peripheral reactions with low multiplicity and central collisions with high multiplicity. Peripheral reactions are also characterized by the existence of a leading particle which retains a large proportion of the incoming energy. By taking the notion of peripheral literally Ref.2 suggested that in this kind of reaction the surface of the colliding hadrons is locally excited giving rise to a hot spot, which is de-excited by two processes: 1) emission of particles into the vacuum 2) propagation of “heat” into the body of the target (projectile) wherefrom it is eventually also emitted through particle production. Particles produced in process 1) will have higher energies than those due to process 2), because in the latter process the excitation energy is in part degraded. This gives rise to an asymmetry with respect to the leading particle, which should be detectable in an experimental event by event analysis. This effect was confirmed by Jacques Goldberg[4] in K− p→ K− p π+ π− reactions at 14 GEV/c. This experiment represents the first observation of local equilibrium in hadronic interactions, allowing in principle a quantitative determination of heat conductivity in hadronic matter along the lines of Ref.3. This observation came as a surprise,[5] because, although the electron proton scattering experiments had shown beyond any doubt that the nucleon had a finite size, it was a-priori not clear whether this size was sufficiently big for the hot spot effect to be observable, i. e. whether heat conductivity in hadronic matters was sufficiently small. Experiment4 suggests that this is the case.

### Hot spots in nuclei

In atomic nuclei, because of their larger dimensions as compared with nucleons, statistical and thermodynamical concepts have been used already in the 1930s. Hans Bethe[6] had suggested that propagation of heat in nuclear matter could be studied in central collisions and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga[7] had calculated the corresponding heat conductivity. The interest in this phenomenon was resurrected in the 1970s by the work of Weiner and Weström[8][9] who established the link between the hot spot model and the pre-equilibrium approach used in low-energy heavy-ion reactions.[10][11] Experimentally the hot spot model in nuclear reactions was confirmed in a series of investigations[12][13][14][15] some of which of rather sophisticated nature including polarization measurements of protons[16] and gamma rays.[17] Subsequently on the theoretical side the link between hot spots and limiting fragmentation[18] and transparency[19] in high-energy heavy ion reactions was analyzed and “drifting hot spots” for central collisions were studied.[20][21] With the advent of heavy ion accelerators experimental studies of hot spots in nuclear matter became a subject of current interest and a series of special meetings[22][23][24][25] was dedicated to the topic of local equilibrium in strong interactions. The phenomena of hot spots, heat conduction and preequilibrium play also an important part in high-energy heavy ion reactions and in the search for the phase transition to quark matter.[26]

## Hot spots and solitons

Solitary waves (solitons) are a possible physical mechanism for the creation of hot spots in nuclear interactions. Solitons are a solution of the hydrodynamic equations characterized by a stable localized high density region and small spatial volume. They were predicted[27][28] to appear in low-energy heavy ion collisions at velocities of the projectile slightly exceeding the velocity of sound (E/A ~ 10-20 MeV; here E is the incoming energy and A the atomic number). Possible evidence[29] for this phenomenon is provided by the experimental observation[30] that the linear momentum transfer in 12C induced heavy-ion reactions is limited.

## References

1. ↑ Cf. e.g. Richard M. Weiner, Analogies in Physics and Life, World Scientific 2008, p. 123.
2. ↑ Weiner, Richard M. (18 March 1974). "Asymmetry in Peripheral Production Processes". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 32 (11): 630–633. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.32.630. ISSN 0031-9007.
3. ↑ Weiner, Richard M. (1 February 1976). "Propagation of "heat" in hadronic matter". Physical Review D (American Physical Society (APS)) 13 (5): 1363–1375. doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.1363. ISSN 0556-2821.
4. ↑ Goldberg, Jacques (23 July 1979). "Observation of Preequilibrium Pion Evaporation from Excited Hadrons?". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 43 (4): 250–252. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.250. ISSN 0031-9007.
5. ↑ "Hot spots discussed at Bonn". CERN Courier 19 (1): 24–25. 1979. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1730397.
6. ↑ Bethe, H. (1938). "Proceedings of the American Physical Society, Minutes of the New York Meeting February 25-26 1938. Abstract 3: Possible Deviations from the Evaporation Model of Nuclear Reactions". Physical Review 53 (8): 675. In this short abstract a forward-backward asymmetry in central collisions is considered.
7. ↑ Tomonaga, S. (1938). "Innere Reibung und Wärmeleitfähigkeit der Kernmaterie" (in de). Zeitschrift für Physik (Springer Science and Business Media LLC) 110 (9–10): 573–604. doi:10.1007/bf01340217. ISSN 1434-6001.
8. ↑ Weiner, R.; Weström, M. (16 June 1975). "Pre-equilibrium and Heat Conduction in Nuclear Matter". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 34 (24): 1523–1527. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.34.1523. ISSN 0031-9007.
9. ↑ Weiner, R.; Weström, M. (1977). "Diffusion of heat in nuclear matter and preequilibrium phenomena". Nuclear Physics A (Elsevier BV) 286 (2): 282–296. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(77)90408-0. ISSN 0375-9474.
10. ↑ Blann, M (1975). "Preequilibrium Decay". Annual Review of Nuclear Science (Annual Reviews) 25 (1): 123–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.25.120175.001011. ISSN 0066-4243.
11. ↑ J. M. Miller, in Proc lnt. Conf. on nuclear physics, voL 2, ed. J. de Boer and H. J. Mang (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973) p. 398.
12. ↑ Ho, H.; Albrecht, R.; Dünnweber, W.; Graw, G.; Steadman, S. G.; Wurm, J. P.; Disdier, D.; Rauch, V. et al. (1977). "Pre-equilibrium alpha emission accompanying deep-inelastic 16O+58Ni collisions". Zeitschrift für Physik A (Springer Science and Business Media LLC) 283 (3): 235–245. doi:10.1007/bf01407203. ISSN 0340-2193.
13. ↑ Nomura, T.; Utsunomiya, H.; Motobayashi, T.; Inamura, T.; Yanokura, M. (13 March 1978). "Statistical Analysis of Preequilibriumα-Particle Spectra and Possible Local Heating". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 40 (11): 694–697. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.694. ISSN 0031-9007.
14. ↑ Westerberg, L.; Sarantites, D. G.; Hensley, D. C.; Dayras, R. A.; Halbert, M. L.; Barker, J. H. (1 July 1978). "Pre-equilibrium particle emission from fusion of 12C+158Gd and 20Ne+150Nd". Physical Review C (American Physical Society (APS)) 18 (2): 796–814. doi:10.1103/physrevc.18.796. ISSN 0556-2813.
15. ↑ Utsunomiya, H.; Nomura, T.; Inamura, T.; Sugitate, T.; Motobayashi, T. (1980). "Preequilibrium α-particle emission in heavy-ion reactions". Nuclear Physics A (Elsevier BV) 334 (1): 127–143. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(80)90144-x. ISSN 0375-9474.
16. ↑ Sugitate, T.; Nomura, T.; Ishihara, M.; Gono, Y.; Utsunomiya, H.; Ieki, K.; Kohmoto, S. (1982). "Polarization of preequilibrium proton emission in the 93Nb + 14N reaction". Nuclear Physics A (Elsevier BV) 388 (2): 402–420. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(82)90422-5. ISSN 0375-9474.
17. ↑ Trautmann, W.; Hansen, Ole; Tricoire, H.; Hering, W.; Ritzka, R.; Trombik, W. (22 October 1984). "Dynamics of Incomplete Fusion Reactions fromγ-Ray Circular-Polarization Measurements". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 53 (17): 1630–1633. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.1630. ISSN 0031-9007.
18. ↑ Beckmann, R.; Raha, S.; Stelte, N.; Weiner, R.M. (1981). "Limiting fragmentation in high-energy heavy-ion reactions and preequilibrium". Physics Letters B (Elsevier BV) 105 (6): 411–416. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)91194-1. ISSN 0370-2693.
19. ↑ Beckmann, R; Raha, S; Stelte, N; Weiner, R M (1 February 1984). "Limiting Fragmentation and Transparency in High Energy Heavy Ion Collisions". Physica Scripta (IOP Publishing) 29 (3): 197–201. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/29/3/002. ISSN 0031-8949.
20. ↑ Stelte, N.; Weiner, R. (1981). "Cumulative effect and hot spots". Physics Letters B (Elsevier BV) 103 (4–5): 275–280. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90223-9. ISSN 0370-2693.
21. ↑ Stelte, N.; Weström, M.; Weiner, R.M. (1982). "Drifting hot spots". Nuclear Physics A (Elsevier BV) 384 (1–2): 190–210. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(82)90313-x. ISSN 0375-9474.
22. ↑ “Local Equilibrium in Strong Interactions Physics” (LESIP I), Eds. D. K. Scott and R. M. Weiner, World Scientific 1985
23. ↑ Hadronic Matter in Collision” (LESIP II) Eds. P. Carruthers and D. Strottman, World Scientific 1986
24. ↑ “Hadronic Matter in Collision 1988” (LESIP III), Eds. P. Carruthers and J. Rafelski, World Scientific 1988
25. ↑ “Correlations and Multiparticle Production” (LESI IV), Eds. M. Plümer, S. Raha and R. M. Weiner, World Scientific 1991.
26. ↑ Gyulassy, Miklos; Rischke, Dirk H.; Zhang, Bin (1997). "Hot spots and turbulent initial conditions of quark-gluon plasmas in nuclear collisions". Nuclear Physics A 613 (4): 397–434. doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(96)00416-2. ISSN 0375-9474.
27. ↑ Fowler, G.N.; Raha, S.; Stelte, N.; Weiner, R.M. (1982). "Solitons in nucleus-nucleus collisions near the speed of sound". Physics Letters B (Elsevier BV) 115 (4): 286–290. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90371-9. ISSN 0370-2693.
28. ↑ Raha, S.; Wehrberger, K.; Weiner, R.M. (1985). "Stability of density solitons formed in nuclear collisions". Nuclear Physics A (Elsevier BV) 433 (3): 427–440. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(85)90274-x. ISSN 0375-9474.
29. ↑ Raha, S.; Weiner, R. M. (7 February 1983). "Are Solitons Already Seen in Heavy-Ion Reactions?". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 50 (6): 407–408. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.407. ISSN 0031-9007.
30. ↑ Galin, J.; Oeschler, H.; Song, S.; Borderie, B.; Rivet, M. F. et al. (28 June 1982). "Evidence for a Limitation of the Linear Momentum Transfer in 12C-Induced Reactions between 30 and 84 MeV/u". Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society (APS)) 48 (26): 1787–1790. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1787. ISSN 0031-9007.

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot spot effect in subatomic physics. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Physics:Hot_spot_effect_in_subatomic_physics&oldid=4109003"