New York City Board of Education v. Tom F.

This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning judges and elections:[1]

* Does the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, stating that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits tuition reimbursement where a child has not previously received special education from a public agency, stand in direct contradiction to the plain language of 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(10)(C)(ii) which authorizes tuition reimbursement to the parents of a disabled child “who previously received special education and related services under the authority of a public agency”?

## References[edit]

1. ↑ Bd. of Educ. v. Tom F., No. 06-637. Certiorari granted Feb. 26, 2007. Ruling below: 193 Fed. Appx. 26 (2d Cir. 2006).