Oppenheimer–Snyder model

Short description: Exact solution to the Einstein field equations

Template:General relativity In general relativity, the Oppenheimer–Snyder model is a solution to the Einstein field equations based on the Schwarzschild metric describing the collapse of an object of extreme mass into a black hole.[1] It is named after physicists J. Robert Oppenheimer and Hartland Snyder, who published it in 1939.[2]

During the collapse of a star to a black hole the geometry on the outside of the sphere is the Schwarzschild geometry. However the geometry inside is the same Robertson-Walker geometry as in the rest of the observable universe.[3]

## Contents

* 1 History
* 2 Model
* 3 Reception and legacy
* 4 In popular culture
* 5 See also
* 6 References
* 7 External links

## History

Albert Einstein, who had developed his theory of general relativity in 1915, initially denied the possibility of black holes,[4] even though they were a genuine implication of the Schwarzschild metric, obtained by Karl Schwarzschild in 1916, the first known non-trivial exact solution to Einstein's field equations.[1] In 1939, Einstein published "On a Stationary System with Spherical Symmetry Consisting of Many Gravitating Masses" in the Annals of Mathematics, claiming to provide "a clear understanding as to why these 'Schwarzschild singularities' do not exist in physical reality."[4][5]: 250-1

Months after the issuing of Einstein's article,[4] J. Robert Oppenheimer and his student Hartland Snyder studied this topic with their paper "On Continued Gravitational Contraction" making the opposite argument as Einstein's.[6][5]: 250–1 They showed when a sufficiently massive star runs out of thermonuclear fuel, it will undergo continued gravitational contraction and become separated from the rest of the universe by a boundary called the event horizon, which not even light can escape. This paper predicted the existence of what are today known as black holes.[1][7]: 31–2 The term "black hole" was coined decades later, in the fall of 1967, by John Archibald Wheeler at a conference held by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City;[7]: 31–2 it appeared for the first time in print the following year.[8] In this paper, Oppenheimer and Snyder used Einstein's own theory of gravity to prove how black holes could develop for the first time in contemporary physics, but without referencing the aforementioned article by Einstein.[4] Oppenheimer and Snyder did, however, refer to an earlier article by Oppenheimer and Robert Serber on neutron stars,[9] improving upon the work of Lev Davidovich Landau,[10] in what was essentially an exercise in nuclear physics and gravitation.[11]: 269

This investigation attracted the attention of Richard Chace Tolman, who had previously obtained an exact solution to the Einstein field equations describing a static ideal fluid sphere.[12] Oppenheimer and George Volkoff subsequently published paper on the stability of neutron stars, the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit.[13] These papers established the foundation for the general-relativistic theory of stellar structure.[11]: 269 Actually, the objects Tolman, Oppenheimer, and Volkoff studied were the neutron stars of Fritz Zwicky rather than the "neutron cores" of Lev Landau. But while Zwicky did introduce the notion of neutron stars, much of his work on this topic was later rejected as wrong. By contrast, the paper by Oppenheimer and Volkoff has been accepted as correct.[14]: 206–7 This led Oppenheimer to consider the natural next problem of determining what would happen if a neutron star were so heavy it would collapse due to its own weight.[14]: 211–2

However, Oppenheimer would not revisit the topic in future publications.[15]

## Model

The Oppenheimer–Snyder model of continued gravitational collapse is described by the line element[16]ds2=−dτ2+A2(η)(dR21−2MR−2Rb21R++R2dΩ2)The quantities appearing in this expression are as follows:

* The coordinates are (τ,R,θ,ϕ) where θ,ϕ are spherical coordinates.
* Rb>0 is the boundary of the matter region
* M>0 the mass.
* R−=min(R,Rb) and R+=max(R,Rb).
* η is defined implicitly by the equation

τ(η,R)=12R+32M(η+sin⁡η).

* A(η)=1+cos⁡η2.

This expression is valid both in the matter region R<Rb, and the vacuum region R>Rb, and continuously transitions between the two.

## Reception and legacy

Kip Thorne recalled that physicists were initially skeptical of the model, viewing it as "truly strange" at the time.[15] He explained further, "It was hard for people of that era to understand the paper because the things that were being smoked out of the mathematics were so different from any mental picture of how things should behave in the universe."[17]: 89–90 Werner Israel noted that the work of Oppenheimer and his collaborators on the end states of compact objects had actually been foreshadowed by the discovery of an upper limit on the mass of a white dwarf by Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. Yet, like the works of Oppenheimer and his colleagues, this was initially rejected and almost forgotten.[18] While physicists had become used to the relativity of the passage of time in different frames of reference, the gravitational time dilation implied by the Oppenheimer-Snyder model was too extreme for most physicists at the time to accept. For a distant inertial observer, the surface of the star undergoing continued gravitational implosion would freeze at the critical radius (the Schwarzschild radius) but for an observer on the surface of the star, the process would continue. Moreover, any light emitted at the critical radius would be infinitely red shifted, making the star appear to "cut itself off" from the external universe.[14]: 214–8

Oppenheimer himself thought little of this discovery.[2] However, some considered the model's discovery to be more significant than Oppenheimer did,[2] and the model would later be described as forward thinking.[15] Freeman Dyson thought it was Oppenheimer's greatest contribution to science. Lev Davidovich Landau added the Oppenheimer-Snyder paper to his "golden list" of classic papers.[2] Due to Landau's influence, most Soviet theoretical physicists accepted this result as well.[14]: 219 John Archibald Wheeler was initially an opponent of the model until the late 1950s,[1][15] when he was asked to teach a course on general relativity at Princeton University.[8] Wheeler claimed at a conference in 1958 that the Oppenheimer-Snyder model had neglected the many features of a realistic star.[14]: 209–11 Indeed, in order to keep the mathematics manageable, Oppenheimer and Snyder assumed a perfectly spherical star with no spin, zero internal pressure, uniform density, no mass ejection, no shock waves, and no radiation emission.[14]: 216–7 However, he later changed his mind completely after being informed by Edward Teller of the results of a computer simulation ran by Stirling Colgate and his team at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.[1] Colgate and his colleagues adapted the computer codes for developing the thermonuclear bomb (the Teller-Ulam design) to simulate the gravitational implosion of a star. They assumed that the star was spherical and not rotating, but otherwise took into account all the complications of a real star. They found that a sufficiently heavy star would undergo continued gravitational contraction in a manner similar to the idealized scenario described by Oppenheimer and Snyder.[14]: 238–9 Independently, a team led by Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich relied on their own expertise and computer simulations for the Soviet Union's hydrogen bomb (the Sakharov-Zeldovich idea) and reached the same conclusion.[14]: 240–1

Labeled image of Sagittarius A* taken by the Chandra X-ray Observatory in 2003

At the First Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics in 1963, Wheeler gave an lengthy lecture on gravitational contraction, in which he shared his enthusiasm for the Oppenheimer-Snyder model.[14]: 240 He subsequently played a key role in reviving interest in general relativity in the United States, and popularized the term "black hole" in the late 1960s.[8] Various theoretical physicists pursued this topic[5]: 250–1 and by the late 1960s and early 1970s, advances in observational astronomy, such as radio telescopes, changed the attitude of the scientific community.[17]: 89–90 Pulsars and quasars had already been discovered and neither neutron stars nor black holes were considered mere textbook curiosities.[11]: 269 [18] Cygnus X-1, the first solid black-hole candidate, was discovered by the Uhuru X-ray space telescope in 1971.[1] Observations of the central radio source of the Milky Way, Sagittarius A*, and the center of the spiral galaxy NGC 4258, both of which identified as supermassive black holes, came in the 1990s.[18] Further evidence arrived in the 2000s thanks to the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory. The works of Oppenheimer and his collaborates was the initial impetus for this golden age of astrophysics.[19]: 165–6 Jeremy Bernstein described the Oppenheimer-Snyder publication as "one of the great papers in twentieth-century physics."[17]: 89–90

A mental block for many physicists who were skeptical of the Oppenheimer-Snyder model was the so-called "Schwarzschild singularity"—meaning the boundary of a black hole—which turned out to be a removable by a change of coordinates. (The central singularity, however, cannot be removed.) In 1958, David Finkelstein found such a coordinate transformation and gave a lecture on it at King's College London. Roger Penrose was in attendance. (Arthur Stanley Eddington had introduced the same idea earlier, but the true significance of this insight was not understood and it was soon forgotten.)[14]: 244–51 Penrose won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2020 for his contributions to the mathematical theory of black holes, one of the frontiers of modern theoretical physics.[20] He credited the Oppenheimer–Snyder model as one of his inspirations for research.[21][15]

The Hindu wrote in 2023:[22]

> The world of physics does indeed remember the paper. While Oppenheimer is remembered in history as the “father of the atomic bomb”, his greatest contribution as a physicist was on the physics of black holes. The work of Oppenheimer and Hartland Snyder helped transform black holes from figments of mathematics to real, physical possibilities – something to be found in the cosmos out there.

## In popular culture

* In the 2023 film Oppenheimer, an interaction between Oppenheimer and his student Snyder occurs as their paper was published on the same day as the invasion of Poland.[22][23]

## See also

* Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equation
* Timeline of gravitational physics and relativity

## References

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 McEvoy, J. P.; Zarate, Oscar (1995). Introducing Stephen Hawking. Totem Books. ISBN 978-1-874-16625-2.
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Bartusiak, Marcia (2015). "Chapter 6: Only Its Gravitational Field Persists". Black Hole: How an Idea Abandoned by Newtonians, Hated by Einstein, and Gambled on by Hawking Became Loved. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-21085-9.
3. ↑ Hamilton, Andrew (November 13, 2011). "Collapse to a Black Hole". https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/bh/collapse.html.
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Bernstein, Jeremy (2007). "The Reluctant Father of Black Holes" (in en). Scientific American 17: 4–11. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0407-4sp. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-reluctant-father-of-black-holes-2007-04/. Retrieved 2023-08-03.
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Isaacson, Walter (2007). "Chapter Eleven: Einstein's Universe". Einstein: His Life and Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-6473-0.
6. ↑ Oppenheimer, J.R.; Snyder, H. (1939). "On Continued Gravitational Contraction". Physical Review 56 (5): 455–459. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.455. Bibcode: 1939PhRv...56..455O.
7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Pais, Abraham; Crease, Robert (2006). J. Robert Oppenheimer: A Life. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-195-32712-0.
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Bartusiak, Marcia (2015). "Chapter 9: Why Don't You Call It A Black Hole?". Black Hole: How an Idea Abandoned by Newtonians, Hated by Einstein, and Gambled on by Hawking Became Loved. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-21085-9.
9. ↑ Oppenheimer, J.R.; Serber, Robert (1938). "On the Stability of Stellar Neutron Cores". Physical Review 54 (7): 540. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.540. Bibcode: 1938PhRv...54..540O.
10. ↑ Landau, Lev D. (1938). "Origin of Stellar Energy". Nature 141: 333–334. doi:10.1038/141333b0. https://www.nature.com/articles/141333b0.
11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Pais, Abraham (2005). "Chapter 15: The New Dynamics". Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-192-80672-7.
12. ↑ Tolman, Richard C. (1939). "Static Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid". Physical Review 55 (364): 364–373. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.364. Bibcode: 1939PhRv...55..364T. https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.55.364.
13. ↑ Oppenheimer, J. Robert; Volkoff, George (1939). "On Massive Neutron Cores". Physical Review 55 (374). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.374. https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.55.374.
14. ↑ 14.00 14.01 14.02 14.03 14.04 14.05 14.06 14.07 14.08 14.09 Thorne, Kip (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-03505-0.
15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 McGrath, Jenny. "'Oppenheimer' fact v. fiction: A nuclear historian breaks down what the movie got right and wrong" (in en-US). https://www.businessinsider.com/oppenheimer-fact-vs-fiction-what-the-movie-got-right-wrong-2023-7.
16. ↑ Donis, Peter (9 January 2023). "Oppenheimer-Snyder Model of Gravitational Collapse: Mathematical Details". https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/oppenheimer-snyder-model-of-gravitational-collapse-mathematical-details/.
17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Bird, Kai; Sherwin, Martin J. (2006). American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-375-72626-2.
18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 Israel, Werner (2000). "Black Hole 2000: The Astrophysical Era". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 112 (772): 583-585. doi:10.1086/316557. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/316557.
19. ↑ Cassidy, David (2011). A Short History of Physics in the American Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-04936-9.
20. ↑ Blum, Alexander; Bonolis, Luisa; Lalli, Roberto; Gomez, Juan-Andres Leon; Renn, Jürgen (December 8, 2020). "From the Renaissance of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity to the Confirmation of the Black Hole Paradigm". Max Planck Society for the History of Science. https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/feature-story/renaissance-einsteins-general-theory-relativity-confirmation-black-hole-paradigm.
21. ↑ Nobel Prize Foundation (March 2021). "Roger Penrose Interview". https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2020/penrose/interview/.
22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 "Oppenheimer: Remembering the physics that first made him great" (in en-IN). The Hindu. 2023-07-29. ISSN 0971-751X. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/oppenheimer-snyder-stellar-collapse-black-hole-formation/article67131932.ece.
23. ↑ Jones, Nate (2023-07-25). "What's Fact and What's Fiction in Oppenheimer?" (in en-us). https://www.vulture.com/2023/07/oppenheimer-historical-accuracy-what-really-happened.html.

## External links

* "The First Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics: A Historic Perspective, Sixty Years Later" by Kip Thorne, presented at the 32nd Symposium in Shanghai, China, December 11, 2023.

* v
* t
* e

Black holes

Types|

* Schwarzschild
* Rotating
* Charged
* Virtual
* Kugelblitz
* Primordial
* Planck particle

Size|

* Micro
* Extremal
* Electron
* Stellar
* Microquasar
* Intermediate-mass
* Supermassive
* Active galactic nucleus
* Quasar
* Blazar

Formation|

* Stellar evolution
* Gravitational collapse
* Neutron star
* Related links
* Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit
* White dwarf
* Related links
* Supernova
* Related links
* Hypernova
* Gamma-ray burst
* Binary black hole

Properties|

* Gravitational singularity
* Ring singularity
* Theorems
* Event horizon
* Photon sphere
* Innermost stable circular orbit
* Ergosphere
* Penrose process
* Blandford–Znajek process
* Accretion disk
* Hawking radiation
* Gravitational lens
* Bondi accretion
* M–sigma relation
* Quasi-periodic oscillation
* Thermodynamics
* Immirzi parameter
* Schwarzschild radius
* Spaghettification

Issues|

* Black hole complementarity
* Information paradox
* Cosmic censorship
* ER=EPR
* Final parsec problem
* Firewall (physics)
* Holographic principle
* No-hair theorem

Metrics|

* Schwarzschild (Derivation)
* Kerr
* Reissner–Nordström
* Kerr–Newman
* Hayward

Alternatives|

* Nonsingular black hole models
* Black star
* Dark star
* Dark-energy star
* Gravastar
* Magnetospheric eternally collapsing object
* Planck star
* Q star
* Fuzzball

Analogs|

* Optical black hole
* Sonic black hole

Lists|

* Black holes
* Most massive
* Nearest
* Quasars
* Microquasars

Related|

* Black Hole Initiative
* Black hole starship
* Compact star
* Exotic star
* Quark star
* Preon star
* Gamma-ray burst progenitors
* Gravity well
* Hypercompact stellar system
* Membrane paradigm
* Naked singularity
* Quasi-star
* Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer
* Timeline of black hole physics
* White hole
* Wormhole

* Category
* Commons

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer–Snyder model. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Astronomy:Oppenheimer–Snyder_model&oldid=4216175"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template