Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Short description: German polymath (1646–1716)

"Leibniz" redirects here. For other uses, see Leibniz (disambiguation).

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Bildnis des Philosophen Leibniz (c. 1695), by Christoph Francke

Born| 1 July 1646

Leipzig, Saxony, Holy Roman Empire

Died| 14 November 1716(1716-11-14) (aged 70)

Hanover, Electorate of Hanover, Holy Roman Empire

Education|

* Alte Nikolaischule, Leipzig
* Leipzig University (BA, 1662; MA, 1664; LLB, 1665; Dr. phil. hab., 1666)
* University of Jena (1663)[1]
* University of Altdorf (Dr. jur., 1666)

Era| 17th-/18th-century philosophy
Region| Western philosophy
School|

* Rationalism
* Pluralistic idealism[2]
* Foundationalism[3]
* Conceptualism[4]
* Optimism
* Indirect realism[5]
* Correspondence theory of truth[6]
* Relationalism

Theses|

* Template:Langr () (March 1666)
* Disputatio Inauguralis de Casibus Perplexis in Jure () (November 1666)

Doctoral advisor| Bartholomäus Leonhard von Schwendendörffer (de) (Dr. jur. advisor)[7][8]
Other academic advisors|

* Erhard Weigel (Jena)[1]
* Jakob Thomasius (B.A. advisor)[9]
* Johann Friedrich LeBret (de)[10]
* Christiaan Huygens

Notable students|

* Jacob Bernoulli (epistolary correspondent)
* Christian Wolff (epistolary correspondent)

Main interests

| Mathematics, physics, geology, medicine, biology, embryology, epidemiology, veterinary medicine, paleontology, psychology, engineering, librarianship, linguistics, philology, sociology, metaphysics, ethics, economics, diplomacy, history, politics, music theory, poetry, logic, theodicy, universal language, universal science

Notable ideas

* Algebraic logic
* Binary code
* Calculus
* Differential equations
* Mathesis universalis
* Monads
* Best of all possible worlds
* Pre-established harmony
* Identity of indiscernibles
* Mathematical matrix
* Mathematical function
* Newton–Leibniz axiom
* Leibniz's notation
* Leibniz integral rule
* Integral symbol
* Leibniz harmonic triangle
* Leibniz's test
* Leibniz formula for π
* Leibniz formula for determinants
* Fractional derivative
* Chain rule
* Quotient rule
* Product rule
* Leibniz wheel
* Leibniz's gap
* Algebra of concepts
* Vis viva (principle of conservation of energy)
* Principle of least action
* Salva veritate
* Stepped reckoner
* Symbolic logic
* Analysis situs
* Principle of sufficient reason
* Law of continuity
* Transcendental law of homogeneity
* Ars combinatoria (alphabet of human thought)
* Characteristica universalis
* Calculus ratiocinator
* Compossibility
* Partial fraction decomposition
* Protogaea
* Problem of why there is anything at all
* Pluralistic idealism
* Metaphysical dynamism
* Relationalism
* Apperception
* A priori/a posteriori distinction
* Deontic logic

Signature

Template:Theodicy

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (or Leibnitz;[lower-alpha 1] 1 July 1646 [O.S. 21 June] - 14 November 1716) was a German polymath active as a mathematician, philosopher, scientist and diplomat who is credited, alongside Isaac Newton, with the creation of calculus in addition to many other branches of mathematics, such as binary arithmetic and statistics. Leibniz has been called the "last universal genius" due to his vast expertise across fields, which became a rarity after his lifetime with the coming of the Industrial Revolution and the spread of specialized labour.[15] He is a prominent figure in both the history of philosophy and the history of mathematics. He wrote works on philosophy, theology, ethics, politics, law, history, philology, games, music, and other studies. Leibniz also made major contributions to physics and technology, and anticipated notions that surfaced much later in probability theory, biology, medicine, geology, psychology, linguistics and computer science.

Leibniz contributed to the field of library science, developing a cataloguing system (at the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbüttel, Germany) that came to serve as a model for many of Europe's largest libraries.[16][17] His contributions to a wide range of subjects were scattered in various learned journals, in tens of thousands of letters and in unpublished manuscripts. He wrote in several languages, primarily in Latin, French and German.[lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3]

As a philosopher, he was a leading representative of 17th-century rationalism and idealism. As a mathematician, his major achievement was the development of differential and integral calculus, independently of Newton's contemporaneous developments.[20] Leibniz's notation has been favoured as the conventional and more exact expression of calculus.[21][22][23] In addition to his work on calculus, he is credited with devising the modern binary number system[24] which is the basis of modern communications and digital computing[25] (though the English astronomer Thomas Harriot had devised the same system decades before[26]). He envisioned the field of combinatorial topology as early as 1679,[27] and helped initiate the field of fractional calculus.[28][29][page needed]

In the 20th century, Leibniz's notions of the law of continuity and the transcendental law of homogeneity found a consistent mathematical formulation by means of non-standard analysis. He was also a pioneer in the field of mechanical calculators. While working on adding automatic multiplication and division to Pascal's calculator, he was the first to describe a pinwheel calculator in 1685[30] and invented the Leibniz wheel, later used in the arithmometer, the first mass-produced mechanical calculator.

In philosophy and theology, Leibniz is most noted for his optimism, i.e. his conclusion that our world is, in a qualified sense, the best possible world that God could have created, a view sometimes lampooned by other thinkers, such as Voltaire in his satirical novella Candide. Leibniz, along with René Descartes and Baruch Spinoza, was one of the three influential early modern rationalists. His philosophy also assimilates elements of the scholastic tradition, notably the assumption that some substantive knowledge of reality can be achieved by reasoning from first principles or prior definitions. The work of Leibniz anticipated modern logic and still influences contemporary analytic philosophy, such as its adopted use of the term possible world to define modal notions.

## Contents

* 1 Biography
* 1.1 Early life
* 1.2 1666–1676
* 1.3 House of Hanover, 1676–1716
* 1.4 Death
* 1.5 Personal life
* 2 Philosophy
* 2.1 Principles
* 2.2 Monads
* 2.3 Theodicy and optimism
* 2.4 Discourse on Metaphysics
* 2.5 Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Formal logic
* 3 Mathematics
* 3.1 Linear systems
* 3.2 Geometry
* 3.3 Calculus
* 3.4 Topology
* 4 Science and engineering
* 4.1 Physics
* 4.1.1 The Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* 4.2 Other natural science
* 4.3 Psychology
* 5 External links

## Biography

### Early life

File:LeipzigLeibniz.JPGLeibniz monument (de ) at Leipzig University

Gottfried Leibniz was born on 1 July [OS: 21 June] 1646, in Leipzig, in the Electorate of Saxony of the Holy Roman Empire (now in the German state of Saxony) to Friedrich Leibniz (1597–1652) and Catharina Schmuck (1621–1664).[31][page needed] He was baptized two days later at St. Nicholas Church, Leipzig; his godfather was the Lutheran theologian Martin Geier [de; de].[32] His father died when he was six years old, and Leibniz was raised by his mother.[33] Leibniz's father had been a Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Leipzig, where he also served as dean of philosophy. The boy inherited his father's personal library. He was given free access to it from the age of seven, shortly after his father's death. While Leibniz's schoolwork was largely confined to the study of a small canon of authorities, his father's library enabled him to study a wide variety of advanced philosophical and theological works - ones that he would not have otherwise been able to read until his college years.[34] Access to his father's library, largely written in Latin, also led to his proficiency in the Latin language, which he achieved by the age of 12. At the age of 13 he composed 300 hexameters of Latin verse in a single morning for a special event at school.[35]

In April 1661 he enrolled in his father's former university at age 14.[36][1][37] There he was guided, among others, by Jakob Thomasius, previously a student of Friedrich. Leibniz completed his bachelor's degree in Philosophy in December 1662. He defended his Template:Langr ('Metaphysical Disputation on the Principle of Individuation'),[38] which addressed the principle of individuation, on 9 June 1663 [O.S. 30 May], presenting an early version of monadic substance theory. Leibniz earned his master's degree in Philosophy on 7 February 1664. In December 1664 he published and defended a dissertation Specimen Quaestionum Philosophicarum ex Jure collectarum (),[38] arguing for both a theoretical and a pedagogical relationship between philosophy and law. After one year of legal studies, he was awarded his bachelor's degree in Law on 28 September 1665.[39] His dissertation was titled De conditionibus ().[38]

In early 1666, at age 19, Leibniz wrote his first book, Template:Langr (), the first part of which was also his habilitation thesis in Philosophy, which he defended in March 1666.[38][lower-alpha 4] Template:Langr was inspired by Ramon Llull's Ars Magna[40] and contained a proof of the existence of God, cast in geometrical form, and based on the argument from motion. His next goal was to earn his license and Doctorate in Law, which normally required three years of study. In 1666, the University of Leipzig turned down Leibniz's doctoral application and refused to grant him a Doctorate in Law, most likely due to his relative youth.[41][42] Leibniz subsequently left Leipzig.[43]

Leibniz then enrolled in the University of Altdorf and quickly submitted a thesis, which he had probably been working on earlier in Leipzig.[44] The title of his thesis was Disputatio Inauguralis de Casibus Perplexis in Jure ().[38] Leibniz earned his license to practice law and his Doctorate in Law in November 1666. He next declined the offer of an academic appointment at Altdorf, saying that "my thoughts were turned in an entirely different direction".[45]

As an adult, Leibniz often introduced himself as "Gottfried von Leibniz". Many posthumously published editions of his writings presented his name on the title page as "Freiherr G. W. von Leibniz." However, no document has ever been found from any contemporary government that stated his appointment to any form of nobility.[46]

### 1666–1676

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Leibniz's first position was as a salaried secretary to an alchemical society in Nuremberg.[47] He knew fairly little about the subject at that time but presented himself as deeply learned. He soon met Johann Christian von Boyneburg (1622–1672), the dismissed chief minister of the Elector of Mainz, Johann Philipp von Schönborn.[48] Von Boyneburg hired Leibniz as an assistant, and shortly thereafter reconciled with the Elector and introduced Leibniz to him. Leibniz then dedicated an essay on law to the Elector in the hope of obtaining employment. The stratagem worked; the Elector asked Leibniz to assist with the redrafting of the legal code for the Electorate.[49] In 1669, Leibniz was appointed assessor in the Court of Appeal. Although von Boyneburg died late in 1672, Leibniz remained under the employment of his widow until she dismissed him in 1674.[50]

Von Boyneburg did much to promote Leibniz's reputation, and the latter's memoranda and letters began to attract favourable notice. After Leibniz's service to the Elector there soon followed a diplomatic role. He published an essay, under the pseudonym of a fictitious Polish nobleman, arguing (unsuccessfully) for the German candidate for the Polish crown. The main force in European geopolitics during Leibniz's adult life was the ambition of Louis XIV, backed by French military and economic might. Meanwhile, the Thirty Years' War had left German-speaking Europe exhausted, fragmented, and economically backward. Leibniz proposed to protect German-speaking Europe by distracting Louis as follows: France would be invited to take Egypt as a stepping stone towards an eventual conquest of the Dutch East Indies. In return, France would agree to leave Germany and the Netherlands undisturbed. This plan obtained the Elector's cautious support. In 1672, the French government invited Leibniz to Paris for discussion,[51] but the plan was soon overtaken by the outbreak of the Franco-Dutch War and became irrelevant. Napoleon's failed invasion of Egypt in 1798 can be seen as an unwitting, late implementation of Leibniz's plan, after the Eastern hemisphere colonial supremacy in Europe had already passed from the Dutch to the British.

Thus Leibniz went to Paris in 1672. Soon after arriving, he met Dutch physicist and mathematician Christiaan Huygens and realised that his own knowledge of mathematics and physics was patchy. With Huygens as his mentor, he began a program of self-study that soon pushed him to making major contributions to both subjects, including discovering his version of the differential and integral calculus. He met Nicolas Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld, the leading French philosophers of the day, and studied the writings of Descartes and Pascal, unpublished as well as published.[52] He befriended a German mathematician, Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus; they corresponded for the rest of their lives.

Stepped reckoner

When it became clear that France would not implement its part of Leibniz's Egyptian plan, the Elector sent his nephew, escorted by Leibniz, on a related mission to the English government in London, early in 1673.[53] There Leibniz came into acquaintance of Henry Oldenburg and John Collins. He met with the Royal Society where he demonstrated a calculating machine that he had designed and had been building since 1670.[24] The machine was able to execute all four basic operations (adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing), and the society quickly made him an external member. The mission ended abruptly when news of the Elector's death (12 February 1673) reached them. Leibniz promptly returned to Paris and not, as had been planned, to Mainz.[54] The sudden deaths of his two patrons in the same winter meant that Leibniz had to find a new basis for his career. In this regard, a 1669 invitation from Duke John Frederick of Brunswick to visit Hanover proved to have been fateful. Leibniz had declined the invitation, but had begun corresponding with the duke in 1671. In 1673, the duke offered Leibniz the post of counsellor. Leibniz very reluctantly accepted the position two years later, only after it became clear that no employment was forthcoming in Paris, whose intellectual stimulation he relished, or with the Habsburg imperial court.[55]

In 1675 he tried to get admitted to the French Academy of Sciences as a foreign honorary member, but it was considered that there were already enough foreigners there and so no invitation came. He left Paris in October 1676.

### House of Hanover, 1676–1716

File:Leibniz Hannover.jpgPortrait of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Public Library of Hanover, 1703

Leibniz managed to delay his arrival in Hanover until the end of 1676 after making one more short journey to London, where Newton accused him of having seen his unpublished work on calculus in advance.[lower-alpha 5] This was alleged to be evidence supporting the accusation, made decades later, that he had stolen calculus from Newton. On the journey from London to Hanover, Leibniz stopped in The Hague where he met van Leeuwenhoek, the discoverer of microorganisms. He also spent several days in intense discussion with Spinoza, who had just completed, but had not published, his masterwork, the Ethics.[57] Spinoza died very shortly after Leibniz's visit.

In 1677, he was promoted, at his request, to Privy Counselor of Justice, a post he held for the rest of his life. Leibniz served three consecutive rulers of the House of Brunswick as historian, political adviser, and most consequentially, as librarian of the ducal library. He thenceforth employed his pen on all the various political, historical, and theological matters involving the House of Brunswick; the resulting documents form a valuable part of the historical record for the period.

Leibniz began promoting a project to use windmills to improve the mining operations in the Harz mountains. This project did little to improve mining operations and was shut down by Duke Ernst August in 1685.[55]

Sophia honours Leibniz symbolically with the laurel wreath in a relief by Karl Gundelach (de ) part of the history frieze on the New Town Hall in Hanover

Among the few people in north Germany to accept Leibniz were the Electress Sophia of Hanover (1630–1714), her daughter Sophia Charlotte of Hanover (1668–1705), the Queen of Prussia and his avowed disciple, and Caroline of Ansbach, the consort of her grandson, the future George II. To each of these women he was correspondent, adviser, and friend. In turn, they all approved of Leibniz more than did their spouses and the future king George I of Great Britain.[lower-alpha 6]

The population of Hanover was only about 10,000, and its provinciality eventually grated on Leibniz. Nevertheless, to be a major courtier to the House of Brunswick was quite an honour, especially in light of the meteoric rise in the prestige of that House during Leibniz's association with it. In 1692, the Duke of Brunswick became a hereditary Elector of the Holy Roman Empire. The British Act of Settlement 1701 designated the Electress Sophia and her descent as the royal family of England, once both King William III and his sister-in-law and successor, Queen Anne, were dead. Leibniz played a role in the initiatives and negotiations leading up to that Act, but not always an effective one. For example, something he published anonymously in England, thinking to promote the Brunswick cause, was formally censured by the British Parliament.

The Brunswicks tolerated the enormous effort Leibniz devoted to intellectual pursuits unrelated to his duties as a courtier, pursuits such as perfecting calculus, writing about other mathematics, logic, physics, and philosophy, and keeping up a vast correspondence. He began working on calculus in 1674; the earliest evidence of its use in his surviving notebooks is 1675. By 1677 he had a coherent system in hand, but did not publish it until 1684. Leibniz's most important mathematical papers were published between 1682 and 1692, usually in a journal which he and Otto Mencke founded in 1682, the Acta Eruditorum. That journal played a key role in advancing his mathematical and scientific reputation, which in turn enhanced his eminence in diplomacy, history, theology, and philosophy.

Pages from Leibniz's papers in the National Library of Poland

The Elector Ernest Augustus commissioned Leibniz to write a history of the House of Brunswick, going back to the time of Charlemagne or earlier, hoping that the resulting book would advance his dynastic ambitions. From 1687 to 1690, Leibniz traveled extensively in Germany, Austria, and Italy, seeking and finding archival materials bearing on this project. Decades went by but no history appeared; the next Elector became quite annoyed at Leibniz's apparent dilatoriness. Leibniz never finished the project, in part because of his huge output on many other fronts, but also because he insisted on writing a meticulously researched and erudite book based on archival sources, when his patrons would have been quite happy with a short popular book, one perhaps little more than a genealogy with commentary, to be completed in three years or less. Leibniz was appointed Librarian of the Herzog August Library in Wolfenbüttel, Lower Saxony, in 1691. Three volumes of the Scriptores rerum Brunsvicensium were published from 1707 to 1711.[59][page needed]

In 1708, John Keill, writing in the journal of the Royal Society and with Newton's presumed blessing, accused Leibniz of having plagiarised Newton's calculus.[60] Thus began the calculus priority dispute which darkened the remainder of Leibniz's life. A formal investigation by the Royal Society (in which Newton was an unacknowledged participant), undertaken in response to Leibniz's demand for a retraction, upheld Keill's charge. Historians of mathematics writing since 1900 or so have tended to acquit Leibniz, pointing to important differences between Leibniz's and Newton's versions of calculus.

In 1712, Leibniz began a two-year residence in Vienna, where he was appointed Imperial Court Councillor to the Habsburgs. On the death of Queen Anne in 1714, Elector George Louis became King George I of Great Britain, under the terms of the 1701 Act of Settlement. Even though Leibniz had done much to bring about this happy event, it was not to be his hour of glory. Despite the intercession of the Princess of Wales, Caroline of Ansbach, George I forbade Leibniz to join him in London until he completed at least one volume of the history of the Brunswick family his father had commissioned nearly 30 years earlier. Moreover, for George I to include Leibniz in his London court would have been deemed insulting to Newton, who was seen as having won the calculus priority dispute and whose standing in British official circles could not have been higher. Finally, his dear friend and defender, the Dowager Electress Sophia, died in 1714. In 1716, while traveling in northern Europe, the Russian Tsar Peter the Great stopped in Bad Pyrmont and met Leibniz, who took interest in Russian matters since 1708 and was appointed advisor in 1711.[61]

### Death

File:Leibnizbüste Leibniztempel.jpgReplica of the Leibniz bust in the Leibniz temple in Hanover

Leibniz died in Hanover in 1716, and was interred in the New Town Church (Neustädter Kirche). At the time, he was so out of favour that neither George I (who happened to be near Hanover at that time) nor any fellow courtier other than his personal secretary attended the funeral. Even though Leibniz was a life member of the Royal Society and the Berlin Academy of Sciences, neither organization saw fit to honour his death. His grave went unmarked for more than 50 years. He was, however, eulogized by Fontenelle, before the French Academy of Sciences in Paris, which had admitted him as a foreign member in 1700. The eulogy was composed at the behest of the Duchess of Orleans, a niece of the Electress Sophia.

### Personal life

Leibniz never married. He proposed to an unknown woman at age 50, but changed his mind when she took too long to decide.[62] He complained on occasion about money, but the fair sum he left to his sole heir, his sister's stepson, proved that the Brunswicks had paid him fairly well. In his diplomatic endeavors, he at times verged on the unscrupulous, as was often the case with professional diplomats of his day. On several occasions, Leibniz backdated and altered personal manuscripts, actions which put him in a bad light during the calculus controversy.[63]

He was charming, well-mannered, and not without humor and imagination.[lower-alpha 7] He had many friends and admirers all over Europe. He was identified as a Protestant and a philosophical theist.[67][68][69][70] Leibniz remained committed to Trinitarian Christianity throughout his life.[71]

## Philosophy

Leibniz's philosophical thinking appears fragmented because his philosophical writings consist mainly of a multitude of short pieces: journal articles, manuscripts published long after his death, and letters to correspondents. He wrote two book-length philosophical treatises, of which only the Template:Langr ('theodicy') of 1710 was published in his lifetime.

Leibniz dated his beginning as a philosopher to his Discourse on Metaphysics, which he composed in 1686 as a commentary on a running dispute between Nicolas Malebranche and Antoine Arnauld. This led to an extensive correspondence with Arnauld;[72][73] it and the Discourse were not published until the 19th century. In 1695, Leibniz made his public entrée into European philosophy with a journal article titled "New System of the Nature and Communication of Substances".[74][75][76] Between 1695 and 1705, he composed his New Essays on Human Understanding, a lengthy commentary on John Locke's 1690 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, but upon learning of Locke's 1704 death, lost the desire to publish it, so that the New Essays were not published until 1765. The Monadologie, composed in 1714 and published posthumously, consists of 90 aphorisms.

Leibniz also wrote a short paper, "Template:Langr" ('first truths'), first published by Louis Couturat in 1903[77][lower-alpha 8] summarizing his views on metaphysics. The paper is undated; that he wrote it while in Vienna in 1689 was determined only in 1999, when the ongoing historical-critical scholarly editing of the collected papers of Leibniz by the editorial project Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe ('Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Complete Writings and Letters'), the Leibniz-Edition ('Leibniz edition') colloqually, finally published Leibniz's philosophical writings for the period 1677–1690.[80] Couturat's reading of this paper influenced much 20th-century thinking about Leibniz, especially among analytic philosophers. After a meticulous study (informed by the 1999 additions to the Leibniz-Edition) of all of Leibniz's philosophical writings up to 1688, (Mercer 2001) disagreed with Couturat's reading.[clarification needed]

Leibniz met Baruch Spinoza in 1676, read some of his unpublished writings, and was influenced by some of Spinoza's ideas.[citation needed] While Leibniz befriended Spinoza and admired his powerful intellect, he was also dismayed by Spinoza's conclusions,[81][82][83] especially when these were inconsistent with Christian orthodoxy.

Unlike Descartes and Spinoza, Leibniz had a university education in philosophy. He was influenced by his Leipzig professor Jakob Thomasius, who also supervised his Bachelor of Arts thesis in philosophy.[9] Leibniz also read Francisco Suárez, a Spanish Jesuit respected even in Lutheran universities. Leibniz was deeply interested in the new methods and conclusions of Descartes, Huygens, Newton, and Boyle, but the established philosophical ideas in which he was educated influenced his view of their work.

### Principles

Leibniz variously invoked one or another of seven fundamental philosophical Principles:[84]

* Identity/contradiction. If a proposition is true, then its negation is false and vice versa.
* Identity of indiscernibles. Two distinct things cannot have all their properties in common. If every predicate possessed by x is also possessed by y and vice versa, then entities x and y are identical; to suppose two things indiscernible is to suppose the same thing under two names. The "identity of indiscernibles" is frequently invoked in modern logic and philosophy. It has attracted the most controversy and criticism, especially from corpuscular philosophy and quantum mechanics. The converse of this is often called Leibniz's law, or the indiscernibility of identicals, which is mostly uncontroversial.
* Sufficient reason. "There must be a sufficient reason for anything to exist, for any event to occur, for any truth to obtain."[85]
* Pre-established harmony.[86][lower-alpha 9] "[T]he appropriate nature of each substance brings it about that what happens to one corresponds to what happens to all the others, without, however, their acting upon one another directly" (Discourse on Metaphysics, XIV).[citation needed] A dropped glass shatters because it "knows" it has hit the ground, and not because the impact with the ground "compels" the glass to split.
* Law of continuity. Natura non facit saltus[87][lower-alpha 10][90][91] (lit. Nature does not make jumps).
* Optimism. "God assuredly always chooses the best."[92]
* Plenitude. Leibniz believed that the best of all possible worlds would actualize every genuine possibility, and argued in his Template:Langr that this best of all possible worlds will contain all possibilities, with our finite experience of eternity giving no reason to dispute nature's perfection.[93]

Leibniz would on occasion give a rational defense of a specific principle, but more often took them for granted.[lower-alpha 11]

### Monads

A page from Leibniz's manuscript of the Monadology

Leibniz's best known contribution to metaphysics is his theory of monads, as exposited in Monadologie. He proposes his theory that the universe is made of an infinite number of simple substances known as monads.[95] Monads can also be compared to the corpuscles of the mechanical philosophy of René Descartes and others. These simple substances or monads are the "ultimate units of existence in nature". Monads have no parts but still exist by the qualities that they have. These qualities are continuously changing over time, and each monad is unique. They are also not affected by time and are subject to only creation and annihilation.[96] Monads are centers of force; substance is force, while space, matter, and motion are merely phenomenal. He argued, against Newton, that space, time, and motion are completely relative:[97] "As for my own opinion, I have said more than once, that I hold space to be something merely relative, as time is, that I hold it to be an order of coexistences, as time is an order of successions."[98] Einstein, who called himself a "Leibnizian", wrote in the introduction to Max Jammer's book Concepts of Space that Leibnizianism was superior to Newtonianism, and his ideas would have dominated over Newton's had it not been for the poor technological tools of the time; Joseph Agassi argues that Leibniz paved the way for Einstein's theory of relativity.[99]

Leibniz's proof of God can be summarized in the Template:Langr.[100] Reason is governed by the principle of contradiction and the principle of sufficient reason. Using the principle of reasoning, Leibniz concluded that the first reason of all things is God.[100] All that we see and experience is subject to change, and the fact that this world is contingent can be explained by the possibility of the world being arranged differently in space and time. The contingent world must have some necessary reason for its existence. Leibniz uses a geometry book as an example to explain his reasoning. If this book was copied from an infinite chain of copies, there must be some reason for the content of the book.[101] Leibniz concluded that there must be the "monas monadum" or God.

The ontological essence of a monad is its irreducible simplicity. Unlike atoms, monads possess no material or spatial character. They also differ from atoms by their complete mutual independence, so that interactions among monads are only apparent. Instead, by virtue of the principle of pre-established harmony, each monad follows a pre-programmed set of "instructions" peculiar to itself, so that a monad "knows" what to do at each moment. By virtue of these intrinsic instructions, each monad is like a little mirror of the universe. Monads need not be "small"; e.g., each human being constitutes a monad, in which case free will is problematic.

Monads are purported to have gotten rid of the problematic:

* interaction between mind and matter arising in the system of Descartes;
* lack of individuation inherent to the system of Spinoza, which represents individual creatures as merely accidental.

### Theodicy and optimism

The Template:Langr[lower-alpha 12] tries to justify the apparent imperfections of the world by claiming that it is optimal among all possible worlds. It must be the best possible and most balanced world, because it was created by an all-powerful and all-knowing God, who would not choose to create an imperfect world if a better world could be known to him or possible to exist. In effect, apparent flaws that can be identified in this world must exist in every possible world, because otherwise God would have chosen to create the world that excluded those flaws.[102]

Leibniz asserted that the truths of theology (religion) and philosophy cannot contradict each other, since reason and faith are both "gifts of God" so that their conflict would imply God contending against himself. The Template:Langr is Leibniz's attempt to reconcile his personal philosophical system with his interpretation of the tenets of Christianity.[103] This project was motivated in part by Leibniz's belief, shared by many philosophers and theologians during the Enlightenment, in the rational and enlightened nature of the Christian religion. It was also shaped by Leibniz's belief in the perfectibility of human nature (if humanity relied on correct philosophy and religion as a guide), and by his belief that metaphysical necessity must have a rational or logical foundation, even if this metaphysical causality seemed inexplicable in terms of physical necessity (the natural laws identified by science).

In the view of Leibniz, because reason and faith must be entirely reconciled, any tenet of faith which could not be defended by reason must be rejected. Leibniz then approached one of the central criticisms of Christian theism:[103] if God is all good, all wise, and all powerful, then how did evil come into the world? The answer (according to Leibniz) is that, while God is indeed unlimited in wisdom and power, his human creations, as creations, are limited both in their wisdom and in their will (power to act). This predisposes humans to false beliefs, wrong decisions, and ineffective actions in the exercise of their free will. God does not arbitrarily inflict pain and suffering on humans; rather he permits both moral evil (sin) and physical evil (pain and suffering) as the necessary consequences of metaphysical evil (imperfection), as a means by which humans can identify and correct their erroneous decisions, and as a contrast to true good.[104]

Further, although human actions flow from prior causes that ultimately arise in God and therefore are known to God as metaphysical certainties, an individual's free will is exercised within natural laws, where choices are merely contingently necessary and to be decided in the event by a "wonderful spontaneity" that provides individuals with an escape from rigorous predestination.

### Discourse on Metaphysics

For Leibniz, "God is an absolutely perfect being". He describes this perfection later in section VI as the simplest form of something with the most substantial outcome (VI ). Along these lines, he declares that every type of perfection "pertains to him (God) in the highest degree" (I{{full citation needed |date=September 2025} not specifically drawn out, Leibniz highlights the one thing that, to him, does certify imperfections and proves that God is perfect: "that one acts imperfectly if he acts with less perfection than he is capable of", and since God is a perfect being, he cannot act imperfectly (III[full citation needed]). Because God cannot act imperfectly, the st be perfect. Leibniz also comforts readers, stating that because he has done everything to the most perfect degree; those who love him cannot be injured. However, to love God is a subject of difficulty as Leibniz believes that we are "not disposed to wish for that which God desires" because we have the ability to alter our disposition (IV[full citation needed]). In accordance with this, many act as rebels, but Leibniz says that the only way we c ll that comes to us according to his will" (IV[full citation needed]). Because God is "an absolutely perfect being" (I ), Leibniz argues that God would be acting imperfectly if he acted with any less perfection than what he is able of (IIILua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[108][109]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

> The only way to rectify our reasonings is to make them as tangible as those of the Mathematicians, so that we can find our error at a glance, and when there are disputes among persons, we can simply say: Let us calculate, without further ado, to see who is right.

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Leibniz's calculus ratiocinator, which resembles symbolic logic, can be viewed as a way of making such calculations feasible. Leibniz wrote memoranda[lower-alpha 13] that can now be read as groping attempts to get symbolic logic - and thus his calculus - off the ground. These writings remained unpublished until the appearance of a selection edited by Carl Immanuel Gerhardt (1859). Louis Couturat published a selection in 1901; by this time the main developments of modern logic had been created by Charles Sanders Peirce and by Gottlob Frege.

Leibniz thought symbols were important for human understanding. He attached so much importance to the development of good notations that he attributed all his discoveries in mathematics to this. His notation for calculus is an example of his skill in this regard. Leibniz's passion for symbols and notation, as well as his belief that these are essential to a well-running logic and mathematics, made him a precursor of semiotics.[110]

But Leibniz took his speculations much further. Defining a character as any written sign, he then defined a "real" character as one that represents an idea directly and not simply as the word embodying the idea. Some real characters, such as the notation of logic, serve only to facilitate reasoning. Many characters well known in his day, including Egyptian hieroglyphics, Chinese characters, and the symbols of astronomy and chemistry, he deemed not real.[lower-alpha 14] Instead, he proposed the creation of a characteristica universalis or "universal characteristic", built on an alphabet of human thought in which each fundamental concept would be represented by a unique "real" character:[lower-alpha 15]

> It is obvious that if we could find characters or signs suited for expressing all our thoughts as clearly and as exactly as arithmetic expresses numbers or geometry expresses lines, we could do in all matters insofar as they are subject to reasoning all that we can do in arithmetic and geometry. For all investigations which depend on reasoning would be carried out by transposing these characters and by a species of calculus.

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Complex thoughts would be represented by combining characters for simpler thoughts. Leibniz saw that the uniqueness of prime factorization suggests a central role for prime numbers in the universal characteristic, a striking anticipation of Gödel numbering. Granted, there is no intuitive or mnemonic way to number any set of elementary concepts using the prime numbers.

Because Leibniz was a mathematical novice when he first wrote about the characteristic, at first he did not conceive it as an algebra but rather as a universal language or script. Only in 1676 did he conceive of a kind of "algebra of thought", modeled on and including conventional algebra and its notation. The resulting characteristic included a logical calculus, some combinatorics, algebra, his analysis situs (geometry of situation), a universal concept language, and more. What Leibniz actually intended by his characteristica universalis and calculus ratiocinator, and the extent to which modern formal logic does justice to calculus, may never be established.[lower-alpha 16] Leibniz's idea of reasoning through a universal language of symbols and calculations remarkably foreshadows great 20th-century developments in formal systems, such as Turing completeness, where computation was used to define equivalent universal languages (see Turing degree).

### Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Formal logic

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Leibniz has been noted as one of the most important logicians between the times of Aristotle and Gottlob Frege.[111] Leibniz enunciated the principal properties of what we now call conjunction, disjunction, negation, identity, set inclusion, and the empty set. The principles of Leibniz's logic and, arguably, of his whole philosophy, reduce to two:

1. All our ideas are compounded from a very small number of simple ideas, which form the alphabet of human thought.
2. Complex ideas proceed from these simple ideas by a uniform and symmetrical combination, analogous to arithmetical multiplication.

The formal logic that emerged early in the 20th century also requires, at minimum, unary negation and quantified variables ranging over some universe of discourse.

Leibniz published nothing on formal logic in his lifetime; most of what he wrote on the subject consists of working drafts. In his History of Western Philosophy, Bertrand Russell went so far as to claim that Leibniz had developed logic in his unpublished writings to a level which was reached only 200 years later.

Russell's principal work on Leibniz found that many of Leibniz's most startling philosophical ideas and claims (e.g., that each of the fundamental monads mirrors the whole universe) follow logically from Leibniz's conscious choice to reject relations between things as unreal. He regarded such relations as (real) qualities of things (Leibniz admitted unary predicates only): For him, "Mary is the mother of John" describes separate qualities of Mary and of John. This view contrasts with the relational logic of De Morgan, Peirce, Schröder and Russell himself, now standard in predicate logic. Notably, Leibniz also declared space and time to be inherently relational.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Leibniz's 1690 discovery of his algebra of concepts[112][113] (deductively equivalent to the Boolean algebra)[114] and the associated metaphysics, are of interest in present-day computational metaphysics.[115]

## Mathematics

Although the mathematical notion of function was implicit in trigonometric and logarithmic tables, which existed in his day, Leibniz was the first, in 1692 and 1694, to employ it explicitly, to denote any of several geometric concepts derived from a curve, such as abscissa, ordinate, tangent, chord, and the perpendicular (see History of the function concept).Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". In the 18th century, "function" lost these geometrical associations. Leibniz was also one of the pioneers in actuarial science, calculating the purchase price of life annuities and the liquidation of a state's debt.[116]

Leibniz's research into formal logic, also relevant to mathematics, is discussed in the preceding section. The best overview of Leibniz's writings on calculus may be found in Bos (1974).[117]

Leibniz, who invented one of the earliest mechanical calculators, said of calculation:Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". "For it is unworthy of excellent men to lose hours like slaves in the labour of calculation which could safely be relegated to anyone else if machines were used."[118]

### Linear systems

Leibniz arranged the coefficients of a system of linear equations into an array, now called a matrix, in order to find a solution to the system if it existed.[119] This method was later called Gaussian elimination. Leibniz laid down the foundations and theory of determinants, although the Japanese mathematician Seki Takakazu also discovered determinants independently of Leibniz.[120][121] His works show calculating the determinants using cofactors.[122] Calculating the determinant using cofactors is named the Leibniz formula. Finding the determinant of a matrix using this method proves impractical with large n, requiring to calculate n! products and the number of n-permutations.[123] He also solved systems of linear equations using determinants, which is now called Cramer's rule. This method for solving systems of linear equations based on determinants was found in 1684 by Leibniz (Gabriel Cramer published his findings in 1750).[121] Although Gaussian elimination requires O(n3) arithmetic operations, linear algebra textbooks still teach cofactor expansion before LU factorization.[124][125]

### Geometry

The Leibniz formula for π states that

1−13+15−17+⋯=π4.

Leibniz wrote that circles "can most simply be expressed by this series, that is, the aggregate of fractions alternately added and subtracted".[126] However this formula is only accurate with a large number of terms, using 10,000,000 terms to obtain the correct value of Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". to 8 decimal places.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Leibniz attempted to create a definition for a straight line while attempting to prove the parallel postulate.[127] While most mathematicians defined a straight line as the shortest line between two points, Leibniz believed that this was merely a property of a straight line rather than the definition.[128]

### Calculus

Leibniz is credited, along with Isaac Newton, with the invention of calculus (differential and integral calculus). According to Leibniz's notebooks, a critical breakthrough occurred on 11 November 1675, when he employed integral calculus for the first time to find the area under the graph of a function y = f(x).[129] He introduced several notations used to this day, for instance the integral sign ∫ (∫f(x)dx), representing an elongated S, from the Latin word summa, and the d used for differentials (dydx), from the Latin word differentia. Leibniz did not publish anything about his calculus until 1684.[lower-alpha 17] Leibniz expressed the inverse relation of integration and differentiation, later called the fundamental theorem of calculus, by means of a figureLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". in his 1693 paper Supplementum geometriae dimensoriae....Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". However, James Gregory is credited for the theorem's discovery in geometric form, Isaac Barrow proved a more generalized geometric version, and Newton developed supporting theory. The concept became more transparent as developed through Leibniz's formalism and new notation.[130] The product rule of differential calculus is still called "Leibniz's law". In addition, the theorem that tells how and when to differentiate under the integral sign is called the Leibniz integral rule.

Leibniz exploited infinitesimals in developing calculus, manipulating them in ways suggesting that they had paradoxical algebraic properties. George Berkeley, in a tract called The Analyst and also in De Motu, criticized these. A recent study argues that Leibnizian calculus was free of contradictions, and was better grounded than Berkeley's empiricist criticisms.[131]

Leibniz introduced fractional calculus in a letter written to Guillaume de l'Hôpital in 1695.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". At the same time, Leibniz wrote to Johann Bernoulli about derivatives of "general order".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". In the correspondence between Leibniz and John Wallis in 1697, Wallis's infinite product for 12π is discussed. Leibniz suggested using differential calculus to achieve this result. Leibniz further used the notation d1/2y to denote the derivative of order 12.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

From 1711 until his death, Leibniz was engaged in a dispute with John Keill, Newton and others, over whether Leibniz had invented calculus independently of Newton.

The use of infinitesimals in mathematics was frowned upon by followers of Karl Weierstrass,[132] but survived in science and engineering, and even in rigorous mathematics, via the fundamental computational device known as the differential. Beginning in 1960, Abraham Robinson worked out a rigorous foundation for Leibniz's infinitesimals, using model theory, in the context of a field of hyperreal numbers. The resulting non-standard analysis can be seen as a belated vindication of Leibniz's mathematical reasoning. Robinson's transfer principle is a mathematical implementation of Leibniz's heuristic law of continuity, while the standard part function implements the Leibnizian transcendental law of homogeneity.

### Topology

Leibniz was the first to use the term analysis situs,Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". later used in the 19th century to refer to what is now known as topology. There are two takes on this situation. On the one hand, Mates, citing a 1954 paper in German by Jacob Freudenthal, argues:Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

> Although for Leibniz the situs of a sequence of points is completely determined by the distance between them and is altered if those distances are altered, his admirer Euler, in the famous 1736 paper solving the Königsberg Bridge Problem and its generalizations, used the term geometria situs in such a sense that the situs remains unchanged under topological deformations. He mistakenly credits Leibniz with originating this concept. ... [It] is sometimes not realized that Leibniz used the term in an entirely different sense and hence can hardly be considered the founder of that part of mathematics.

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

But Hideaki Hirano argues differently, quoting Mandelbrot:[133]

> To sample Leibniz' scientific works is a sobering experience. Next to calculus, and to other thoughts that have been carried out to completion, the number and variety of premonitory thrusts is overwhelming. We saw examples in 'packing', ... My Leibniz mania is further reinforced by finding that for one moment its hero attached importance to geometric scaling. In Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". ..., which is an attempt to tighten Euclid's axioms, he states ...: 'I have diverse definitions for the straight line. The straight line is a curve, any part of which is similar to the whole, and it alone has this property, not only among curves but among sets.' This claim can be proved today.

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Thus the fractal geometry promoted by Mandelbrot drew on Leibniz's notions of self-similarity and the principle of continuity: Natura non facit saltus.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[lower-alpha 18]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". We also see that when Leibniz wrote, in a metaphysical vein, that "the straight line is a curve, any part of which is similar to the whole", he was anticipating topology by more than two centuries. As for "packing", Leibniz told his friend and correspondent Des Bosses to imagine a circle, then to inscribe within it three congruent circles with maximum radius; the latter smaller circles could be filled with three even smaller circles by the same procedure. This process can be continued infinitely, from which arises a good idea of self-similarity. Leibniz's improvement of Euclid's axiom contains the same concept.

He envisioned the field of combinatorial topology as early as 1679, in his work titled Characteristica Geometrica, as he "tried to formulate basic geometric properties of figures, to use special symbols to represent them, and to combine these properties under operations so as to produce new ones."Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

## Science and engineering

Leibniz's writings are currently discussed, not only for their anticipations and possible discoveries not yet recognized, but as ways of advancing present knowledge. Much of his writing on physics is included in Gerhardt's Mathematical Writings.

### Physics

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Leibniz contributed a fair amount to the statics and dynamics emerging around him, often disagreeing with Descartes and Newton. He devised a new theory of motion (dynamics) based on kinetic energy and potential energy, which posited space as relative, whereas Newton was thoroughly convinced that space was absolute. An important example of Leibniz's mature physical thinking is his Specimen Dynamicum of 1695.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[lower-alpha 19]

Until the discovery of subatomic particles and the quantum mechanics governing them, many of Leibniz's speculative ideas about aspects of nature not reducible to statics and dynamics made little sense. For instance, he anticipated Albert Einstein by arguing, against Newton, that space, time and motion are relative, not absolute: "As for my own opinion, I have said more than once, that I hold space to be something merely relative, as time is, that I hold it to be an order of coexistences, as time is an order of successions."Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Leibniz held a relational notion of space and time, against Newton's substantivalist views.[134][135][136] According to Newton's substantivalism, space and time are entities in their own right, existing independently of things. Leibniz's relationalism, in contrast, describes space and time as systems of relations that exist between objects. The rise of general relativity and subsequent work in the history of physics has put Leibniz's stance in a more favourable light.

One of Leibniz's projects was to recast Newton's theory as a vortex theory.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". However, his project went beyond vortex theory, since at its heart there was an attempt to explain one of the most difficult problems in physics, that of the origin of the cohesion of matter.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

The principle of sufficient reason has been invoked in recent cosmology, and his identity of indiscernibles in quantum mechanics, a field some even credit him with having anticipated in some sense. In addition to his theories about the nature of reality, Leibniz's contributions to the development of calculus have also had a major impact on physics.

#### The Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Leibniz's Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". ('living force') is mv2, twice the modern kinetic energy. He realized that the total energy would be conserved in certain mechanical systems, so he considered it an innate motive characteristic of matter.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Here too his thinking gave rise to another regrettable nationalistic dispute. His vis viva was seen as rivaling the conservation of momentum championed by Newton in England and by Descartes and Voltaire in France; hence academics in those countries tended to neglect Leibniz's idea. Leibniz knew of the validity of conservation of momentum. In reality, both energy and momentum are conserved (in closed systems), so both approaches are valid. In Einstein's General Relativity, energy and momentum are not separately conserved. This was thought to be fatal until Emmy Noether showed that taken together, as the four-dimensional energy-momentum tensor, they are conserved.[137]

### Other natural science

By proposing that the Earth has a molten core, he anticipated modern geology. In embryology, he was a preformationist, but also proposed that organisms are the outcome of a combination of an infinite number of possible microstructures and of their powers. In the life sciences and paleontology, he revealed an amazing transformist intuition, fueled by his study of comparative anatomy and fossils. One of his principal works on this subject, Protogaea, unpublished in his lifetime, has recently been published in English for the first time. He worked out a primal organismic theory.[lower-alpha 20] In medicine, he exhorted the physicians of his time - with some results - to ground their theories in detailed comparative observations and verified experiments, and to distinguish firmly scientific and metaphysical points of view.

### Psychology

Psychology had been a central interest of Leibniz.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [138] He appears to be an "underappreciated pioneer of psychology"[139] He wrote on topics which are now regarded as fields of psychology: attention and consciousness, memory, learning (association), motivation (the act of "striving"), emergent individuality, the general dynamics of development (evolutionary psychology). His discussions in the New Essays and Monadology often rely on everyday observations such as the behaviour of a dog or the noise of the sea, and he develops intuitive analogies (the synchronous running of clocks or the balance spring of a clock). He also devised postulates and principles that apply to psychology: the continuum of the unnoticed petites perceptions to the distinct, self-aware apperception, and psychophysical parallelism from the point of view of causality and of purpose: "Souls act according to the laws of final causes, through aspirations, ends and means. Bodies act according to the laws of efficient causes, i.e. the laws of motion. And these two realms, that of efficient causes and that of final causes, harmonize with one another."[140] This idea refers to the mind-body problem, stating that the mind and brain do not act upon each other, but act alongside each other separately but in harmony.[141] Leibniz, however, did not use the term psychologia.[lower-alpha 1]

* Hostler, John (1975). Leibniz's Moral Philosophy. UK: Duckworth.
* Huber, Kurt (2014). Leibniz: Der Philosoph der universalen Harmonie. Severus Verlag. Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Hunt, Shelby D. (2003). Controversy in Marketing Theory: For Reason, Realism, Truth, and Objectivity. M. E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-0931-1. "Consistent with the liberal views of the Enlightenment, Leibniz was an optimist with respect to human reasoning and scientific progress [...]. Although he was a great reader and admirer of Spinoza, Leibniz, being a confirmed deist, rejected emphatically Spinoza's pantheism: God and nature, for Leibniz, were not simply two different 'labels' for the same 'thing'."
* Ishiguro, Hidé 1990. Leibniz's Philosophy of Logic and Language. Cambridge University Press.
* Johns, Christopher (2018). n.t.. Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">publisher missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Jolley, Nicholas, ed (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36588-0. OCLC 1244497730. https://archive.org/details/cambridgecompani0000joll/page/n4. Retrieved 2025-09-15.
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Kaldis, Byron, 2011. "Leibniz' Argument for Innate Ideas", in Bruce, Michael and Barbone, Steven, eds., Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
* Karabell, Zachary (2003). Parting the desert: the creation of the Suez Canal. Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-375-40883-0. https://archive.org/details/partingdesertcre00kara.
* Katugampola, Udita N. (15 October 2014). "A New Approach To Generalized Fractional Derivatives". Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 6 (4): 1–15. https://www.emis.de/journals/BMAA/repository/docs/BMAA6-4-1.pdf.
* Kempe, Michael, 2024. The Best of All Possible Worlds: A Life of Leibniz in Seven Pivotal Days. W. W. Norton.
* King, D. Brett; Viney, Wayne; Woody, William (2009). A History of Psychology: Ideas and Context. Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">publisher missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Krech, Eva-Maria, ed (2010) (in de). Deutsches Aussprachewörterbuch (1st ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG. ISBN 978-3-11-018203-3.
* Kromer, Ralf, and Yannick Chin-Drian. New Essays on Leibniz Reception: In Science and Philosophy of Science 1800-2000. 1st ed. 2012. Heidelberg: Birkhauser, 2012.
* LeClerc, Ivor (ed.), 1973. The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Vanderbilt University Press.
* Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (2012). Loptson, Peter. ed. Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Writings. Broadview Press. ISBN 978-1-55481-011-6. "The answer is unknowable, but it may not be unreasonable to see him, at least in theological terms, as essentially a deist. He is a determinist: there are no miracles (the events so called being merely instances of infrequently occurring natural laws); Christ has no real role in the system; we live forever, and hence we carry on after our deaths, but then everything - every individual substance - carries on forever. Nonetheless, Leibniz is a theist. His system is generated from, and needs, the postulate of a creative god. In fact, though, despite Leibniz's protestations, his God is more the architect and engineer of the vast complex world-system than the embodiment of love of Christian orthodoxy."
* Lovejoy, Arthur (1936). "Chapter V, Plenitude and Sufficient Reason in Leibniz and Spinoza". The Great Chain of Being. Harvard University Press. pp. 144–182.
* Look, Brandon C. (2013-07-24). "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz/.
* Luchte, James (2006). "Mathesis and Analysis: Finitude and the Infinite in the Monadology of Leibniz". Heythrop Journal 47 (4): 519–543. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2265.2006.00296.x. http://luchte.wordpress.com/mathesis-and-analysis-finitude-and-the-infinite-in-the-monadology-of-leibniz/.
* MacDonald Ross, George (1990). "Leibniz's Exposition of His System to Queen Sophie Charlotte and Other Ladies". in Poser, H.; Heinekamp, A.. Leibniz in Berlin. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. pp. 61–69. Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Magill, Frank, ed (1990). Masterpieces of World Philosophy. New York: Harper Collins.
* Mangold, Max, ed (2005) (in de). Duden-Aussprachewörterbuch (7th ed.). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut GmbH. ISBN 978-3-411-04066-7.
* Mates, Benson (1986). The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language. Oxford University Press.
* Mates, Benson (1989). The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-505946-5.
* MathGenealogy (2025). Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". at the Mathematics Genealogy Project.
* Mercer, Christia (2001). Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498268. ISBN 0521403014. OCLC 56140851.
* Maor, Eli (2003). The Facts on File Calculus Handbook. The Facts on File Calculus Handbook. ISBN 9781438109541. https://books.google.com/books?id=e1CwvYNfvwgC.
* Miller, Kenneth S.; Ross, Bertram (1993). An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-58884-9.
* Murray, Stuart A.P. (2009). The Library: An Illustrated History. New York, NY: Skyhorse Publishing. ISBN 978-1-60239-706-4. https://archive.org/details/libraryillustrat0000murr/page/122. Retrieved 2025-09-15.
* Müller, Kurt; Krönert, Gisela (1969). Leben und Werk von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Eine Chronik. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
* Nicholls; Leibscher (2010). Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought. Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">author missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">publisher missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* O'Connor, J J; Robertson, E F (1998). "Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz". http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Leibniz.html.
* O'Leary-Hawthorne, John; Cover, J. A. (2008-09-04). Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-07303-5.
* Palumbo, Margherita (2013-01-28). "Leibniz as Librarian". in Antognazza, Maria Rosa. The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford Academic. pp. 608–620. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744725.013.008. ISBN 978-0-19-974472-5.
* Perkins, Franklin (2004). Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light. Cambridge University Press. Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Perkins, Franklin (2007-07-10). Leibniz: A Guide for the Perplexed. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-8264-8921-0. Template:Location missing
* Pombo, Olga (2010). "Three Roots for Leibniz's Contribution to the Computational Conception of Reason". in Ferreira, F.; Löwe, B.; Mayordomo, E. et al.. Programs, Proofs, Processes (CiE 2010). 6158. Berlin: Springer. pp. 352–361. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13962-8_39.
* Przytycki, Józef H.; Bakshi, Rhea Palak; Ibarra, Dionne; Montoya-Vega, Gabriel; Weeks, Deborah (2024). Lectures in Knot Theory: An Exploration of Contemporary Topics. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-40044-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=22X8EAAAQBAJ.
* Riley, Patrick (1996). Leibniz's Universal Jurisprudence: Justice as the Charity of the Wise. Harvard University Press. Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Russell, Bertrand (15 April 2013). History of Western Philosophy: Collectors Edition (revised ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-69284-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=Gm_cCZBiOhQC.
* Rutherford, Donald (1998). Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge University Press. Template:Location missingLua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Sariel, Aviram (2019). "Diabolic Philosophy". Studia Leibnitiana (Franz Steiner Verlag) 51 (1): 99–118. doi:10.25162/sl-2019-0004. ISSN 0039-3185.
* Schulte-Albert, H. G. (1971). Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Library Classification. The Journal of Library History (1966–1972), (2). 133–152.
* Sepioł, Zbigniew (2003). "Legal and political thought of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz" (in pl). Studia Iuridica 41: 227–250. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=7331.
* Simmons, George (2007). Calculus Gems: Brief Lives and Memorable Mathematics. MAA Press. Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".[<span title="Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".">ISBN missing]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Smith, Justin E. H., 2011. Divine Machines. Leibniz and the Sciences of Life, Princeton University Press.
* Strickland, Lloyd (2007). "Explanation of Binary Arithmetic". https://www.leibniz-translations.com/binary.htm.
* Strickland, Lloyd (2023). "Why Did Thomas Harriot Invent Binary?". The Mathematical Intelligencer 46: 57–62. doi:10.1007/s00283-023-10271-9.
* Struik, Dirk Jan, ed (1969). A Source Book in Mathematics, 1200–1800. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674823559. https://archive.org/details/B-001-001-112/page/n8. Retrieved 2025-09-16.
* Sriraman, Bharath, ed (2024). Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. 4. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-40845-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=N-oEEQAAQBAJ.
* Wells, John C. (2008). "Longman Pronunciation Dictionary". Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (3rd ed.). Longman. ISBN 9781405881180.
* Wilson, Catherine (1989). Leibniz's Metaphysics: A Historical and Comparative Study. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691073597. OCLC 20094320.
* Zalta, E. N. (2000). "A (Leibnizian) Theory of Concepts". Philosophiegeschichte und Logische Analyse / Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 3: 137–183. doi:10.30965/26664275-00301008. http://mally.stanford.edu/Papers/leibniz.pdf.

## External links

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
* Works by Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
* Peckhaus, Volker. "Leibniz's Influence on 19th Century Logic". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-logic-influence/.
* Burnham, Douglas. "Gottfried Leibniz: Metaphysics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/leib-met.
* Carlin, Laurence. "Gottfried Leibniz: Causation". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/leib-cau.
* Horn, Joshua. "Leibniz: Modal Metaphysics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/leibniz-modal-metaphysics.
* Jorarti, Julia. "Leibniz: Philosophy of Mind". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/leibniz-mind.
* Lenzen, Wolfgang. "Leibniz: Logic". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/leib-log.
* O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews, http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Leibniz.html .
* Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". at the Mathematics Genealogy Project
* Translations by Jonathan Bennett, of the New Essays, the exchanges with Bayle, Arnauld and Clarke, and about 15 shorter works.
* Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Texts and Translations, compiled by Donald Rutherford, UCSD
* Leibnitiana, links and resources edited by Gregory Brown, University of Houston
* Philosophical Works of Leibniz translated by G.M. Duncan (1890)
* The Best of All Possible Worlds: Nicholas Rescher Talks About Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz's "Versatility and Creativity"
* "Protogæa" (1693, Latin, in Acta eruditorum) – Linda Hall Library
* Protogaea (1749, German) – full digital facsimile from Linda Hall Library
* Leibniz's (1768, 6-volume) Opera omnia – digital facsimile
* Leibniz's arithmetical machine, 1710, online and analyzed on BibNum [click 'à télécharger' for English analysis]
* Leibniz's binary numeral system, 'De progressione dyadica', 1679, online and analyzed on BibNum [click 'à télécharger' for English analysis]

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Cite error: `<ref>` tags exist for a group named "lower-alpha", but no corresponding `<references group="lower-alpha"/>` tag was found

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biography:Gottfried_Wilhelm_Leibniz&oldid=3971773"
*[c.]: circa
*[lit.]: literal translation