Max Weber

Short description: German sociologist, jurist, and political economist (1864–1920)

For other people named Max Weber, see Max Weber (disambiguation).

Max Weber

Portrait by Ernst Gottmann, 1918

Born|

Maximilian Karl Emil Weber

Erfurt, Province of Saxony, Kingdom of Prussia

Died| 14 June 1920(1920-06-14) (aged 56)

Munich, Bavaria, Weimar Republic

Alma mater|

* Friedrich Wilhelm University
* University of Göttingen
* Heidelberg University

Notable work

* The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905)
* The Religion of China (1915)
* The Religion of India (1916)
* "Science as a Vocation" (1917)
* "Politics as a Vocation" (1919)
* Ancient Judaism (1921)
* The City (1921)
* Economy and Society (1922)
* General Economic History (1923)

Spouse(s)|

Marianne Schnitger (m. 1893)

School|

* Continental philosophy
* Antipositivism
* Liberalism

Institutions|

* Friedrich Wilhelm University
* University of Freiburg
* Heidelberg University
* University of Vienna
* University of Munich

Theses|

* On the History of Commercial Partnerships in the Middle Ages, Based on Southern European Documents (1889)
* Roman Agrarian History and Its Significance for Public and Private Law (1891)

Doctoral advisors|

* Levin Goldschmidt
* Rudolf von Gneist
* August Meitzen

Main interests

* History
* economics
* sociology
* law
* religion

Notable ideas

List

* Axiological neutrality
* Disenchantment
* Ideal type
* Inner-worldly asceticism
* Iron cage
* Life chances
* Methodological individualism
* Monopoly on violence
* Protestant work ethic
* Rationalisation
* Secularisation
* Social action (traditional, affectional, Instrumental, and Value-rational)
* Three-component theory of stratification (Class, Party, and Status)
* Tripartite classification of authority (Charismatic, Rational-legal, and Traditional)
* Verstehen
* Weberian bureaucracy

Signature

Maximilian Karl Emil Weber (/ˈveɪbər/; German: [ˈveːbɐ]; 21 April 1864 - 14 June 1920) was a German sociologist, historian, jurist and political economist, who is regarded as among the most important theorists of the development of modern Western society. He was one of the central figures in the development of sociology and the social sciences, and his ideas profoundly influence social theory and research.

Born in Erfurt in 1864, Weber studied law and history in Berlin, Göttingen, and Heidelberg. After earning his doctorate in law in 1889 and habilitation in 1891, he married his cousin Marianne Schnitger and taught in Freiburg and Heidelberg. In 1897, he had a breakdown after his father died following an argument. Weber ceased teaching and travelled until the early 1900s. He recovered and wrote The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. During the First World War, he supported Germany's war effort, but became critical of it and supported democratisation. He also gave the lectures "Science as a Vocation" and "Politics as a Vocation". After the war, Weber cofounded the German Democratic Party, unsuccessfully ran for office, and advised the drafting of the Weimar Constitution. Becoming frustrated with politics, he resumed teaching in Vienna and Munich. He possibly contracted the Spanish flu, and died of pneumonia in 1920 at the age of 56. A book, Economy and Society, was left unfinished.

One of Weber's main intellectual concerns was in understanding the processes of rationalisation, secularisation, and disenchantment. He formulated a thesis arguing that such processes were associated with the rise of capitalism and modernity. Weber also argued that the Protestant work ethic influenced the creation of capitalism in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. It was the earliest part in his broader consideration of the world religions, as he later examined the religions of China, India, and ancient Judaism. In terms of government, Weber argued that states were defined by their monopoly on violence and categorised social authority into three distinct forms: charismatic, traditional, and rational-legal. Weber was also a key proponent of methodological antipositivism, arguing for the study of social action through interpretive rather than purely empiricist methods. Weber made a variety of other contributions to economic sociology, political sociology, and the sociology of religion.

After his death, the rise of Weberian scholarship was slowed by the political instability of the Weimar Republic and the rise of Nazi Germany. In the post-war era, organised scholarship began to appear, led by Talcott Parsons, who used Weber's works to support his idea of structural functionalism. Over the course of the twentieth century, Weber's reputation rose due to the publication of translations of his works and scholarly interpretations of his life and works. He began to be regarded as a founding father of sociology, alongside Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim. As a result of these works, Weber is commonly regarded as one of the central figures in the development of the social sciences.

## Contents

* 1 Biography
* 1.1 Early life and education
* 1.2 Marriage
* 1.3 Early work and breakdown
* 1.4 Later work
* 1.5 Political involvements
* 1.5.1 First World War
* 1.5.2 Weimar Republic
* 1.6 Last years
* 2 Methodology
* 2.1 Verstehen
* 3 Theories
* 3.1 Rationalisation
* 3.1.1 The Rational and Social Foundations of Music
* 3.2 Sociology of religion
* 3.2.1 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
* 3.2.2 The Religion of China
* 3.2.3 The Religion of India
* 3.2.4 Ancient Judaism
* 3.2.5 Theodicy
* 3.3 The state, politics, and government
* 3.3.1 Social stratification
* 3.4 Study of the city
* 3.5 Economics
* 3.5.1 Economy and Society
* 3.5.2 Methodological individualism
* 3.5.3 Marginal utility
* 3.5.4 Economic calculation
* 4 Inspirations
* 5 Legacy
* 5.1 Weber studies
* 5.2 Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe
* 6 Bibliography
* 7 See also
* 8 Citations
* 9 General and cited sources
* 10 Further reading
* 11 External links
* 11.1 Online editions

## Biography

### Early life and education

Maximilian Karl Emil Weber was born on 21 April 1864 in Erfurt, Province of Saxony, Prussia, but his family moved to Berlin in 1869.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He was the oldest of eight children to Max Weber Sr. and his wife Helene Fallenstein.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Over the course of his life, Weber Sr. held posts as a lawyer, civil servant, and parliamentarian for the National Liberal Party in the Prussian Landtag and German Reichstag.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His involvement in public life immersed his home in both politics and academia, as his salon welcomed scholars and public figures such as the philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey, the jurist Levin Goldschmidt, and the historian Theodor Mommsen. The young Max Weber and his brother Alfred, who also became a sociologist, passed their formative years in this intellectual atmosphere.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Fallenstein was partly descended from the French Huguenot Souchay family [de], which had obtained wealth through international commerce and the textile industry.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Over time, Weber Jr. was affected by the marital and personality tensions between his father, "a man who enjoyed earthly pleasures" while overlooking religious and philanthropic causes, and his mother, a devout Calvinist "who sought to lead an ascetic life" and held moral absolutist ideas.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Max Weber (left) and his brothers, Alfred (center) and Karl (right), in 1879

Weber entered the Doebbelinsche Privatschule in Charlottenburg in 1870, before attending the Kaiserin-Augusta-Gymnasium between 1872 and 1882.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) While in class, bored and unimpressed with his teachers, Weber secretly read all forty volumes by the writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Goethe later exerted an important influence on his thought and methodology.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Before entering university, he read many other classical works, including those by the philosopher Immanuel Kant.[1] For Christmas in 1877, a thirteen-year-old Max Weber gifted his parents two historical essays, entitled "About the Course of German history, with Special Reference to the Positions of the Emperor and the Pope", and "About the Roman Imperial Period from Constantine to the Migration Period". Two years later, also during Christmastime, he wrote another historical essay, "Observations on the Ethnic Character, Development, and History of the Indo-European Nations". All of these essays were non-derivative contributions to the philosophy of history and were derived from Weber's reading of "numerous sources".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

In 1882, Weber enrolled in Heidelberg University as a law student, later studying at Friedrich Wilhelm University in Berlin and the University of Göttingen.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Simultaneously with his studies, he practiced law and worked as a lecturer.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In 1886, Weber passed the examination for Referendar, comparable to the bar association examination in the British and U.S. legal systems. Throughout the late 1880s, Weber continued his study of law and history.[2] Under the tutelage of Levin Goldschmidt and Rudolf von Gneist, Weber earned his law doctorate in 1889 by writing a dissertation on legal history titled Development of the Principle of Joint Liability and a Separate Fund of the General Partnership out of the Household Communities and Commercial Associations in Italian Cities. It was later used as part of a longer work, On the History of Commercial Partnerships in the Middle Ages, Based on Southern European Documents, published in the same year.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Two years later, working with the statistician August Meitzen, Weber completed his habilitation, a post-doctoral thesis, titled Roman Agrarian History and Its Significance for Public and Private Law.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Having thus become a privatdozent, Weber joined the faculty of Friedrich Wilhelm University, lecturing, doing research, and consulting for the government.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Weber's years as a university student were dotted with several periods of military service, the longest of which lasted between October 1883 to September 1884. During this time, he was in Strasbourg and attended classes taught by his uncle, the historian Hermann Baumgarten.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber befriended Baumgarten and he influenced Weber's growing liberalism and criticism of Otto von Bismarck's domination of German politics.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) During his first few years in university, he was a member of a fraternity and placed emphasis on drinking beer and fencing.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He was a member of the Burschenschaft Allemannia Heidelberg [de] and obtained several duelling scars on the left side of his face as the result of his duelling.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His mother was displeased by his behaviour and slapped him when he came home after his third semester ended in 1883. However, Weber matured, increasingly began to take his mother's side in family arguments, and grew estranged from his father.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Marriage

Max Weber and his wife Marianne in 1894

Max Weber had a relationship and semi-engagement with Emmy Baumgarten, the daughter of Hermann Baumgarten, from 1887 until her declining mental health caused him to break off their relationship five years later.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Afterwards, he entered a relationship with his distant cousin Marianne Schnitger in 1893 and married her on 20 September.[3] The marriage granted long-awaited financial independence to Weber, allowing him to finally leave his parents' household.[4] They had no children.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Marianne was a feminist activist and an author in her own right.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) She was instrumental in collecting, editing, and publishing Weber's writings in book form after his death, while her biography of him is an important source for understanding Weber's life.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In 1909, they befriended a former student of his, Else von Richthofen, and the pianist Mina Tobler. After a failed attempt to court Richthofen, Weber began an affair with Tobler in 1911.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Eight years later, he began a sadomasochistic affair with Richthofen. Meanwhile, she was simultaneously conducting an affair with his brother, Alfred. Weber's affairs lasted until his death in 1920.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Early work and breakdown

In the years between the completion of his dissertation and habilitation, Weber took an interest in contemporary social policy. In 1888, he joined the Verein für Socialpolitik, a new professional association of German economists affiliated with the historical school. They saw the role of economics primarily as finding solutions to the social problems of the age and pioneered large scale statistical studies of economic issues. He also involved himself in politics, joining the left-leaning Evangelical Social Congress.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In 1890, the Verein established a research program to examine "the Polish question", or ostflucht: the influx of Polish farm workers into eastern Germany as local labourers migrated to Germany's rapidly industrialising cities.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber was put in charge of the study and wrote a large part of the final report, which generated considerable attention and controversy, marking the beginning of Weber's renown as a social scientist.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

From 1893 to 1899, Weber was a member of the Pan-German League (Alldeutscher Verband), an organisation that campaigned against the influx of Polish workers; the degree of his support for the Germanisation of Poles and similar nationalist policies continues to be debated by modern scholars.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber and his wife moved to Freiburg in 1894, where he was appointed professor of economics at the University of Freiburg.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) During his tenure there, in 1895, he gave a provocative lecture titled "The Nation State and Economic Policy", where he criticised the immigration of Poles and blamed the Junkers for perpetuating Slavic immigration to serve their selfish interests.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) It influenced the politician Friedrich Naumann to create the National-Social Association, which was a Christian socialist and nationalist political organisation.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber was pessimistic regarding the association's ability to succeed, and it dissolved after winning a single seat in the Reichstag during the 1903 German federal election.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In 1896, Weber accepted an appointment to a chair in economics and finance at Heidelberg University.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) There, Weber and his wife became the central figures in the eponymous "Weber Circle", which included Georg Jellinek, Ernst Troeltsch, and Werner Sombart. Younger scholars, such as György Lukács and Robert Michels, also joined it.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

In 1897, Weber Sr. died two months after a severe quarrel with his son that remained unresolved.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) After this, Weber became increasingly prone to depression, nervousness, and insomnia, which made it difficult for him to fulfill his duties as a professor.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His condition forced him seek an exemption from his teaching obligations, which he was granted in 1899. He spent time in the Konstanzer Hof sanatorium in 1898 and a different one near the Swabian Jura in 1900. Weber also travelled to Corsica and Italy between 1899 and 1903 in order to alleviate his illness.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He fully withdrew from teaching in 1903 and did not return to it until 1918.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber's ordeal with mental illness was carefully described in a personal chronology that was later destroyed by his widow. The reason for its destruction was possibly because Marianne feared that Weber's work would have been discredited by the Nazis if his experience with mental illness were widely known.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Later work

Max Weber in 1907

Once he had recovered from his illness, he accepted a position as an associate editor of the Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik in 1904, alongside his colleagues Edgar Jaffé and Werner Sombart. It facilitated his reintroduction to academia and became one of the most prominent social science journals as a result of his efforts.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber published some of his most seminal papers in this journal, notably his book The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, which became his most famous work and laid the foundations for his later research on the impact of religion on the development of economic systems.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In it, he argued that the source for the "spirit of capitalism" was in the Reformation. More specifically, he traced it to the Puritan religions. They placed great importance on work, to a degree where other actions mattered less.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) They had a religious calling to work that caused them to systematically obtain wealth. The Puritans wished to prove that they were members of the elect who were destined to go to Heaven.[5] Benjamin Franklin's personal ethic, as described in his "Advice to a Young Tradesman", was used as an example of the economic ethic that the Protestant sects had.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The thesis also contained themes that later proved central to his scholarship: rationalisation and the ideal type.[6] Rationalisation pertained to the increasing systemisation of life that ultimately caused religious influence to decline.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Rationalisation also caused Western society to be caught in the "stahlhartes Gehäuse" ("iron cage" or "steel-hard casing") that was the economic order that was created by modern capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The ideal types were representative figures, or case studies, that represented concepts.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Also in 1904, Max Weber was invited to participate in the Congress of Arts and Sciences held in connection with the World's fair (Louisiana Purchase Exposition) in St. Louis, alongside his wife, Werner Sombart, Ernst Troeltsch, and other German scholars.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Taking advantage of the fair, the Webers embarked on a trip that began and ended in New York City and lasted for almost three months. They travelled throughout the country, from New England to the Deep South. Different communities were visited, including German immigrant towns and African American communities.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Among the places visited was North Carolina, where some of his relatives in the Fallenstein family had settled.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber used the trip to learn more about America and this experience played a role in the development of the Protestant work ethic. He used the trip to find social and theological conditions that could contribute to his thesis. Weber also used the trip to further his knowledge of the United States' social and economic conditions more generally.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) After returning, Weber felt that he was unable to resume regular teaching at that time and continued on as a private scholar, helped by an inheritance in 1907.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In 1909, disappointed with the Verein, he co-founded the German Sociological Association (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie) and served as its first treasurer. He resigned from the position in 1912.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Political involvements

Later, during the spring of 1913, Weber holidayed in the Monte Verità community in Ascona.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) While holidaying, he was advising Frieda Gross in her custody battle for her children. He opposed Erich Mühsam's involvement due to Mühsam's support for anarchism, arguing that the case needed to be dealt with by bourgeois reformers who were not "derailed".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) A year later, also in spring, he again holidayed in Ascona.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In the community, there were several different expressions of the radical political and lifestyle reform movements that were in existence at the time. They included naturism, free love, and Western esotericism, among others. Weber was critical of the anarchist and erotic movements in Ascona, as he viewed their fusion as having been politically absurd.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### First World War

At the outbreak of First World War, Weber, aged 50, volunteered for service and was appointed as a reserve officer in charge of organising the army hospitals in Heidelberg, a role he fulfilled until the end of 1915.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber's views on the war and the expansion of the German Empire changed during the course of the conflict.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Early on, he supported nationalist rhetoric and the war effort, though with some hesitation, viewing the war as a necessity to fulfill German duty as a leading state power. In time, however, Weber became one of the most prominent critics of both German expansionism and the Kaiser's war policies.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber publicly criticised the Belgian annexation policy and unrestricted submarine warfare, later supporting calls for constitutional reform, democratisation, and universal suffrage.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Max Weber (facing right) with Ernst Toller (facing camera) during the Lauenstein Conferences in 1917

He and his wife also participated in the 1917 Lauenstein Conferences that were held at Lauenstein Castle [de] in Bavaria.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) These conferences were planned by the publisher Eugen Diederichs for bringing together intellectuals to create a new age for Germany. Theodor Heuss, Ernst Toller, and Werner Sombart were among the other intellectuals who were invited.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber's presence elevated his profile in Germany and served to dispel some of the romantic atmosphere of the event. After he spoke at the first one, he became involved in the planning for the second one, as Diederichs thought that the conferences needed someone who could serve as an oppositional figure. In this capacity, he argued against the political romanticism that was being espoused by Max Maurenbrecher, a former theologian. Weber also opposed what he saw as the excessive rhetoric of the youth groups and nationalists at Lauenstein, instead supporting the democratisation of Germany.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) For Weber and the younger participants, the romantic intent of the conferences was irrelevant to the determination of Germany's future.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

In November, shortly after the second conference, Weber was invited by the Free Student Youth, a student organisation, to give a lecture in Munich. The resulting lecture was titled "Science as a Vocation".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In it, he described an inner calling as having been necessary for one to enter scholarship. Weber thought that only a particular type of person was able to have a career in academia. He used his own career as an example of a person whose career was in academia. Recalling the arguments that he made regarding the Protestant work ethic, he stated that the path forward in scholarship required the scholar to understand the potential for a lack of success and be methodical in their research. Specialisation was also an aspect of modern scholarship that a scholar needed to engage in.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) A major aspect of his commentary on the role of the scholar in modernity related to disenchantment and intellectual rationalisation. These processes resulted in the nature of life itself being questioned, creating the further question of the role of scholarship in life. Weber argued that scholarship could provide certainty through the use of its starting presumptions, in spite of its inability to give absolute answers.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### Weimar Republic

Following the end of the war, Weber unsuccessfully ran for a seat in the Weimar National Assembly in January 1919 as a member of the liberal German Democratic Party, which he had co-founded.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He also advised the National Assembly in its drafting of the Weimar Constitution.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) While he was campaigning for his party, Weber critiqued the left and complained about the leaders of the leftist Spartacus League, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg. He regarded the German Revolution of 1918–1919 as having been responsible for Germany's inability to fight against Poland's claims on its territory in the east.[7] His opposition to it may have prevented Friedrich Ebert, the new president of Germany and a member of the Social Democratic Party, from appointing Weber as a minister or ambassador.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber was, at the same time, critical of the Treaty of Versailles, which he believed unjustly assigned war guilt to Germany. Instead, Weber believed that many countries were guilty of starting it, not just Germany.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In making this case, Weber argued that Russia was the only great power that actually desired the war. He also regarded Germany as not having been culpable for the invasion of Belgium.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Overall, Weber's political efforts were largely unsuccessful, with the exception of his support for a strong presidency that would be democratically elected.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Max Weber in 1918

On 28 January 1919, after his electoral defeat, Weber delivered a lecture titled "Politics as a Vocation", which commented on what he saw as the inherent violence and dishonesty among politicians.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) About the nature of politicians, he concluded that, "in nine out of ten cases they are windbags puffed up with hot air about themselves. They are not in touch with reality, and they do not feel the burden they need to shoulder; they just intoxicate themselves with romantic sensations."({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His lecture was prompted by the political turmoil of the early Weimar Republic and was requested by the Free Student Youth. He defined politics as having been divided into three aspects: passion, judgment, and responsibility. There was also a division between conviction and responsibility. These two concepts were sharply divided, but it was possible for them to be present in a single individual, particularly the ideal politician.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The types of authority were themselves divided into traditional, charismatic, and rational-legal.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Ultimately, Weber thought that the resolution to the political issues of his day required consistent effort, rather than the quick solutions that the students preferred.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Shortly before he left to join the delegation in Versailles on 13 May 1919, Max Weber used his connections with the deputies of the German National People's Party to meet with Erich Ludendorff. He spent several hours unsuccessfully trying to convince Ludendorff to surrender himself to the Allies.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) This debate also shifted to other subjects, such as who was culpable for the failure of the war effort. Weber thought that the high command had failed, while Ludendorff regarded Weber as a supporter of democracy who was partially responsible for the revolution. Weber tried to disabuse him of that notion by arguing in favour of a democracy that would have a strong executive power. Since he held Ludendorff responsible for the failure of the German war effort and having sent many young Germans to die on the battlefield, Weber thought that he should surrender himself and assume the status of a political martyr. However, Ludendorff was not willing to do so and wished to simply live off of his pension.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Last years

Weber's grave in Heidelberg

Frustrated with politics, Weber resumed teaching, first at the University of Vienna in 1918, then at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich in 1919.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In Vienna, Weber filled a previously vacant chair in political economy that he had been in consideration for since October 1917.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Later, in Munich, he was appointed to Lujo Brentano's chair in social science, economic history, and political economy. He accepted the appointment in order to be closer to his mistress, Else von Richthofen.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Responding to requests by his students, he gave a series of lectures on economic history. The student transcriptions of it were later edited and published as the General Economic History by Siegmund Hellmann [de] and Melchior Palyi [de] in 1923.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Many colleagues and students in Munich attacked his response to the German Revolution, while some right-wing students protested in front of his home.[8]

In early 1920, Max Weber gave a seminar that contained a discussion of Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber respected him and privately described him as having been "a very brilliant and scholarly dilettante".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) That seminar provoked some of his students, who knew Spengler personally, to suggest that he debate Spengler alongside other scholars. They met in the Munich town hall and debated for two days.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The audience was primarily young Germans of different political perspectives, including communists. While neither Weber nor Spengler were able to convince the other of their points, Weber was more cautious and careful in his arguments against Spengler than the other debaters were. After the debate, the students did not feel that they had an answer to the question of what should be done to resolve the issues that Germany faced after the end of the First World War.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Lili, one of Max Weber's sisters, committed suicide on 7 April 1920 as a result of the end of her affair with the pedagogue Paul Geheeb. He thought positively of it, as he thought that it was justified and aligned with his perspective that suicide could be an honourable act.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber and his wife took in Lili's four children and planned to raise them. He was uncomfortable with his newfound role as a father figure, but thought that Marianne was fulfilled as a woman by this event. She later formally adopted the children in 1928. Weber wished for her to stay with the children in Heidelberg or move closer to Geheeb's Odenwaldschule ("Odenwald School"), so that he could be alone in Munich with his mistress, Else von Richthofen. He left the decision to Marianne, but she said that only he could make the decision to leave for himself.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) While this was occurring, Weber began to believe that own life had reached its end.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

On 4 June 1920, Weber's students were informed that he needed to cancel classes due to a cold. By 14 June 1920, the cold had turned into influenza and he died of pneumonia in Munich.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He had likely contracted the Spanish flu and been subjected to insufficient medical care. Else von Richthofen, who was present by his deathbed alongside his wife, thought that he could have survived his illness if he had been given better treatment.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His body was cremated in the Munich Ostfriedhof after a secular ceremony, and the urn that contained his ashes were later buried in the Heidelberg Bergfriedhof [de] in 1921. The funeral service was attended by his students, including Eduard Baumgarten [de] and Karl Loewenstein, and fellow scholars, such as Lujo Brentano.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) At the time of his death, Weber had not finished writing his magnum opus on sociological theory: Economy and Society. His widow, Marianne, helped prepare it for its publication in 1922.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) She later published a biography of her late husband in 1926, which became one of the central historical accounts of his life.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

## Methodology

Sociology, for Max Weber, was "a science which attempts the interpretive understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects".[9] In his methodology, he distinguished himself from Durkheim, Marx, and other classical figures, in that his primary focus was on individuals and culture.[10] Whereas Durkheim focused on the society, Weber concentrated on the individual and their actions (i.e. structure and action). Compared to Marx, who argued for the primacy of the material world over the world of ideas, Weber valued ideas as motivating actions of individuals.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He was open to the idea that social phenomena could have several different causes and placed importance on social actors' interpretations of their actions.[10]

### Verstehen

Main page: Philosophy:Verstehen

In terms of methodology, Weber was primarily concerned with the question of objectivity and subjectivity, going on to distinguish social action from social behavior, noting that social action must be understood through how individuals subjectively relate to one another.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) According to him, the study of social action through interpretive means or verstehen ("to understand") needed to be based upon understanding the subjective meaning and purpose that individuals attached to their actions.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Social actions may have had easily identifiable and objective means, but might have had much more subjective ends.(Kim, 2022) Weber noted that the importance of subjectivity in the social sciences made the creation of fool-proof, universal laws much more difficult than in the natural sciences and that the amount of objective knowledge that social sciences were able to create was limited. Overall, Weber supported the goal of objective science as one worth striving for, though he noted that it was ultimately an unreachable goal.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

There is no absolutely "objective" scientific analysis of culture. … All knowledge of cultural reality … is always knowledge from particular points of view. … An "objective" analysis of cultural events, which proceeds according to the thesis that the ideal of science is the reduction of empirical reality to "laws", is meaningless [because] the knowledge of social laws is not knowledge of social reality but is rather one of the various aids used by our minds for attaining this end.

—Max Weber in Sociological Writings, 1904.[11]

The principle of methodological individualism, which holds that social scientists should seek to understand collectivities solely as the result and the context of the actions of individual persons, can be traced to Weber, particularly to the first chapter of Economy and Society, in which he argued that only individuals "can be treated as agents in a course of subjectively understandable action".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In other words, Weber contended that social phenomena can be understood scientifically only to the extent that they are captured by models of the behaviour of purposeful individuals - models that Weber called "ideal types" - from which actual historical events necessarily deviate due to accidental and irrational factors.[12] The analytical constructs of an ideal type never exist in reality, but provide objective benchmarks against which real-life constructs can be measured.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Weber's methodology was developed in the context of wider debates about methodology of social sciences.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The first of which was the Methodenstreit ("method dispute").({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His position was close to historicism, as he understood social actions as being heavily tied to particular historical contexts and its analysis required the understanding of subjective motivations of individuals.[13] Therefore, his methodology emphasised the use of comparative historical analysis.[14] As such, he was more interested in explaining how a certain outcome was the result of various historical processes rather than predicting an outcome of those processes in the future.[15] The second debate that shaped Weber's perspective on methodology was the Werturteilsstreit ("value-judgment dispute").({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) This debate was held between 1909 and 1914 on the subject of value-judgements in the social sciences. It originated with a debate between the supporters of the idea that ethics was an important consideration in the field of economics and those who opposed that in the Verein für Socialpolitik.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber's position was that the social sciences should strive to be value-free. In his view, scholars and students needed to avoid using their position to promote political values in the classroom. The choosing of values was something that science had no part in. With regards to economics, he argued that the productivity was not a useful scientific concept, as it could impede the proper evaluation of economic phenomena.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

## Theories

### Rationalisation

Rationalisation and the question of individual freedom in an increasingly rational society, was a central theme in Weber's scholarship.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) This theme was situated in the larger context of the relationship between psychological motivations, cultural values, and beliefs, and the structure of the society.[15] Weber understood rationalisation as the individual cost-benefit calculation, the wider bureaucratic organisation of the organisations, and the opposite of understanding the reality through mystery and magic.[16] His studies of the subject began with The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In it, he argued that the redefinition of the connection between work and piety in Protestantism and especially in ascetic Protestant denominations, particularly Calvinism, shifted human effort towards rational efforts aimed at achieving economic gain.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In Protestantism, piety towards God was expressed through one's secular vocation.[17] The rational roots of this doctrine, he argued, soon grew incompatible with and larger than the religious and so the latter were eventually discarded.[18]

What Weber depicted was not only the secularisation of Western culture, but also and especially the development of modern societies from the viewpoint of rationalisation. The new structures of society were marked by the differentiation of the two functionally intermeshing systems that had taken shape around the organisational cores of the capitalist enterprise and the bureaucratic state apparatus. Weber understood this process as the institutionalisation of purposive-rational economic and administrative action. To the degree that everyday life was affected by this cultural and societal rationalisation, traditional forms of life - which in the early modern period were differentiated primarily according to one's trade - were dissolved.

—Jürgen Habermas in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, 1990.[19]

Weber continued his investigation into this matter in later works, notably in his studies on bureaucracy and on the classification of legitimate authority into three types - rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic - of which rational-legal was the dominant one in the modern world.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In these works, Weber described what he saw as society's movement towards rationalisation.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Rationalisation could also be seen in the economy, with the development of highly rational and calculating capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) State bureaucracy and capitalism served as the twin pillars of the developing rational society. The preexisting traditions that relied on the trades were eliminated as a result of those changes.[19] Weber also saw rationalisation as one of the main factors setting the European West apart from the rest of the world.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Features of rationalisation included increasing knowledge, growing impersonality and enhanced control of social and material life.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber was ambivalent towards rationalisation. He admitted that it was responsible for many advances, particularly freeing humans from traditional, restrictive, and illogical social guidelines. However, he also criticised it for dehumanising individuals as "cogs in the machine" and curtailing their freedom, trapping them in the bureaucratic "iron cage" of rationality and bureaucracy.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Related to rationalisation was the process of disenchantment, in which the world was becoming more explained and less mystical, moving from polytheistic religions to monotheistic ones and finally to the Godless science of modernity.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) However, another interpretation of Weber's theory of disenchantment, advanced by the philosopher Jason Josephson Storm, claimed that he did not envision a binary between rationalisation and magical thinking. Instead, he referred to the sequestering and professionalisation of magic when he described disenchantment, rather than the disappearance of magic.[20] Regardless, for Weber, the processes of rationalisation affected all of society, removing "sublime values … from public life" and making art less creative.[21]

#### The Rational and Social Foundations of Music

Max Weber also applied rationalisation to music in his The Rational and Social Foundations of Music.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In writing it, he was partially influenced by his affair with the pianist Mina Tobler. Meanwhile, the scholarly impetus was a sense that Western music was the only type that had become harmonic, while the music of other cultures was more intense and focused on hearing.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He thought that music was becoming increasingly rational and had moved away from the conditions that had defined it under feudalism. Similarly, he argued that changes in the construction of musical instruments and simultaneous social and economic changes had influenced that shift. Musical instruments became more advanced as new materials and construction processes were developed, while the socio-economic positions of the players of different instruments shifted.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In creating this theory, he was influenced by the scientist Hermann von Helmholtz's application of science to the discussion of harmonisation in music. Weber opposed his interpretation of it, which he viewed as having been reductionist.[22]

### Sociology of religion

Weber's work in the field of sociology of religion began with the book The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) It continued with his analyses in The Religion of China, The Religion of India, and Ancient Judaism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) However, his work on other religions was interrupted by his sudden death in 1920, which prevented him from following Ancient Judaism with studies of early Christianity and Islam.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The three main themes within the books were: religious ideas' effect on economic activities, the relationship between social stratification and religious ideas, and the distinguishable characteristics of Western civilisation.[23] His goal was to find reasons for the different developmental paths of the cultures of the Western world and the Eastern world, without making value judgments, unlike the contemporaneous social Darwinists. Weber simply wanted to explain the distinctive elements of Western civilisation.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber also proposed a socio-evolutionary model of religious change where societies moved from magic to ethical monotheism, with the intermediatory steps of polytheism, pantheism, and monotheism. According to him, this was the result of growing economic stability, which allowed for professionalisation and the evolution of an increasingly sophisticated priesthood.[24] As societies grew more complex and encompassed different groups, a hierarchy of gods developed. Meanwhile, as their power became more centralised, the concept of a universal God became more popular and desirable.[25]

#### The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

The development of the concept of the calling quickly gave to the modern entrepreneur a fabulously clear conscience - and also industrious workers; he gave to his employees as the wages of their ascetic devotion to the calling and of co-operation in his ruthless exploitation of them through capitalism the prospect of eternal salvation.

—Max Weber in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, 1905.[17]

The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is Weber's most famous work.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) It was the start of his research on how religions affected how economic systems developed.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In the book, he put forward the thesis that the Protestant work ethic, which was derived from the theological ideas of the Reformation, influenced the development of capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber was looking for electoral affinities between the Protestant work ethic and capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He noted that there was at post-Reformation shift of Europe's economic centre away from Catholic countries such as France, Spain and Italy, and towards Protestant countries such as the Netherlands, England, Scotland, and Germany. Weber also noted that societies that had more Protestants also had a more highly developed capitalist economy.[26] Similarly, in societies with different religions, most successful business leaders were Protestant.[27] Weber thus argued that Roman Catholicism impeded the development of the capitalist economy in the West, as did other religions such as Confucianism and Buddhism elsewhere in the world.[17]

Christian religious devotion had historically been accompanied by rejection of mundane affairs, including economic pursuit.[28] Weber showed that certain types of Protestantism - notably Calvinism - were supportive of rational pursuit of economic gain and worldly activities dedicated to it, seeing them as endowed with moral and spiritual significance.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He argued that the origin of modern capitalism was in the religious ideas of the Reformation.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The "spirit of capitalism" was found in the desire to work hard in a way that pleased the worker and signified their worth, originally had a basis in theology.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In particular, the Protestant work ethic motivated the believers to work hard, be successful in business, and reinvest their profits in further development rather than frivolous pleasures.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber thought that self-restraint, hard work, and a belief that wealth could be a sign of salvation were representative of "ascetic Protestantism".[29] The notion of a calling, when combined with Predestination, meant that each individual had to take action to prove their salvation to themselves.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) However, the success that the religious principles created ultimately removed them as an influence on modern capitalism as a result of its creation of a worldly perspective. As a result, the inheritors of that system were entrapped in a socioeconomic "iron cage".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### The Religion of China

The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism was Weber's second major work on the sociology of religion. Hans Gerth [de] edited and translated this text into English.[30] Weber focused on those aspects of Chinese society that were different from those of Western Europe, especially those aspects that contrasted with Puritanism. As part of that, he questioned why capitalism had not developed in China.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He focused on the issues of Chinese urban development, Chinese patrimonialism and officialdom and Chinese religion and philosophy (primarily Confucianism and Taoism), as the areas in which Chinese development significantly differed from the European route.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) According to Weber, Confucianism and Puritanism were superficially similar, but were actually largely different from one another.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Instead, they were mutually exclusive types of rational thought, each attempting to prescribe a way of life based on religious dogma.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Notably, they both valued self-control and restraint and did not oppose accumulation of wealth. However, both of those qualities were simply means to different final goals.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Confucianism's goal was "a cultured status position", while Puritanism's goal was to create individuals who were "tools of God". For Weber, Puritans sought rational control of the world and rejected its irrationality while Confucians sought rational acceptance of that state of affairs.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Therefore, Weber stated that it was the difference in social attitudes and mentality, shaped by the respective dominant religions, that contributed to the development of capitalism in the West and the absence of it in China.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### The Religion of India

The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism was Weber's third major work on the sociology of religion. In this work he dealt with the structure of Indian society, with the orthodox doctrines of Hinduism and the heterodox doctrines of Buddhism, with modifications brought by the influence of popular religiosity and finally with the impact of religious beliefs on the secular ethic of Indian society.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In Weber's view, Hinduism in India, like Confucianism in China, was a barrier for capitalism.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The Indian caste system, which developed in post-Classical India and served as the source for legitimate social interactions, served as a key part of that. Both Hinduism and the high status of the Brahmins upheld the caste system. The Brahmins used their monopoly on education and theological authority to maintain their position, while Hinduism created a psychological justification for it in the form of the cycle of reincarnation.[31] A person's position in the caste order was thought to have been determined by one's actions in their past life.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) As a result, advancement of the soul and obeying the predetermined order were more important than seeking advancement in the material world, including economic advancement.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Weber ended his research of society and religion in India by bringing in insights from his previous work on China to discuss similarities of the Asian belief systems.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He noted that the believers saw the meaning of life as otherworldly mystical experience.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The social world was fundamentally divided between the educated elite, following the guidance of a prophet or wise man and the uneducated masses whose beliefs are centered on magic. In Asia, there was no Messianic prophecy to give both educated and uneducated followers meaning in their regular lives.[32] Weber juxtaposed such Messianic prophecies, notably from the Near East, with the exemplary prophecies found on the Asian mainland, focused more on reaching to the educated elites and enlightening them on the proper ways to live one's life, usually with little emphasis on hard work and the material world.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) It was those differences that prevented Western countries from following the paths of the earlier Chinese and Indian civilisations. His next work, Ancient Judaism, was an attempt to prove this theory.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### Ancient Judaism

In Ancient Judaism, his fourth major work on the sociology of religion, Weber attempted to explain the factors that resulted in the early differences between Eastern and Western religiosity.[33] He contrasted the innerworldly asceticism developed by Western Christianity with mystical contemplation of the kind developed in India.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber noted that some aspects of Christianity sought to conquer and change the world, rather than withdraw from its imperfections.[33] This fundamental characteristic of Christianity originally stemmed from ancient Jewish prophecy.[34] Weber classified Jewish people as having been a "pariah people", which meant that they were separated from the society that contained them.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He examined the creation and social structure of the ancient Jewish people. In his view, the Israelites maintained order through a covenant with the war god Yahweh and the practice of warrior asceticism. Under Solomon, that changed into a more law-based and organised society than the old confederation was. Religiously, the priests replaced the previous charismatic religious leaders. Weber interpreted the rise of prophets from the shepherds as having begun with Elijah, who promulgated political prophesies and served as an opponent of the monarchy.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### Theodicy

The concept of theodicy played a role in Max Weber's interpretation of theology and religion throughout his corpus. This involved both his scholarly and personal interests in the subject. It was central to his conception of humanity, which he interpreted as having been connected with finding meaning. Amongst German scholars who sought to determine how a world created by an omnibenevolent and omnipotent being can contain suffering, theodicy was a popular subject of study. As part of this tradition, Weber was careful in his study of the subject.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Rather than interpreting it through a theological or ethical lens, he interpreted it through a social one.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Furthermore, he incorporated Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of Ressentiment into his discussion of the topic. However, he disagreed with Nietzsche's emotional discussion of the topic and his interpretation of it as having been a Jewish-derived expression of slave morality.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

He divided theodicy into three main types:({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

1. Persian dualism – God is not all powerful and misfortune comes from outside his power
2. Indian doctrine of karma – God is not all powerful and misfortune comes from inside oneself
3. Doctrine of predestination – Only a chosen few will be saved from damnation

Weber defined the importance of societal class within religion by examining the difference between the theodicies of fortune and misfortune and to what class structures they apply.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The concept of the work ethic was attached to the theodicy of fortune. Therefore, because of the Protestant work ethic, there was an increase of higher class outcomes and more education among Protestants.[35] Those without the work ethic believed in the theodicy of misfortune, believing wealth and happiness were granted in the afterlife. Another example of how this belief of religious theodicy influences class, was that those of lower economic status the poor, tended towards deep religiousness and faith as a way to comfort themselves and provided hope for a more prosperous future, while those of higher economic status preferred the sacraments or actions that proved their right to possess greater wealth.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### The state, politics, and government

In political sociology, one of Weber's most influential contributions is his lecture "Politics as a Vocation", in which he defined "the state" as an entity that was "based on the legitimate use of force".({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Accordingly, Weber proposed that politics is the sharing of state power between various groups, whereas political leaders were those who wield this power.[36] A politician needed to marry the oppositional gesinnungsethik and verantwortungsethik [de] (the "ethic of conviction" and the "ethic of responsibility").({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) An adherent of the verantwortungsethik justified their actions based on their consequences. Meanwhile, an adherent of the gesinnungsethik justified their actions based on their ideals. While Weber thought that both of them would ideally be present in a politician, he associated them with different types of people and mindsets. These different types of people and mindsets reflected the pacifists and those who wanted to reverse Germany's loss in the First World War, respectively.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Weber distinguished three ideal types of legitimate authority:({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

1. Charismatic authority – familial and religious
2. Traditional authority – patriarchs, patrimonialism, feudalism
3. Rational-legal authority – modern law and state, bureaucracy

In his view, every historical relation between rulers and ruled contained such elements, which could be analysed on the basis of this tripartite distinction.[37] Weber noted that the instability of charismatic authority forces it to routinise into a more structured form of authority.[38] In an ideal type of traditional rule, sufficient resistance to a ruler led to a "traditional revolution". The move towards a rational-legal structure of authority, using a bureaucratic structure, is inevitable in the end.[39] Therefore, this theory could sometimes be viewed as part of the sociocultural evolution theory. That was tied to his broader concept of rationalisation by suggesting the inevitability of a move in this direction.[40]

Weber described many ideal types of public administration and government in his Economy and Society. His critical study of the bureaucratisation of society became one of the most enduring parts of his work.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber began the study of bureaucracy and his works led to the popularisation of the term.[41] Many aspects of contemporary public administration date back to him and a classic, hierarchically organised civil service of the Continental type is called "Weberian civil service".[42] As the most efficient and rational way of organising, bureaucratisation was the key part of the rational-legal authority. Furthermore, he saw it as the key process in the ongoing rationalisation of Western society.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Weber listed several preconditions for the emergence of the bureaucracy, which resulted in a need for a more efficient administrative system, including:[43]

1. The growth in space and population being administered
2. The growth in complexity of the administrative tasks being carried out and the existence of a monetary economy

The development of communication and transportation technologies made more efficient administration possible, and popularly requested, and the democratisation and rationalisation of culture resulted in demands that the new system treat everyone equally.[43] Weber's ideal bureaucracy was characterised by hierarchical organisation, delineated lines of authority in a fixed area of activity, action taken on the basis of written rules, bureaucratic officials needing expert training, rules being implemented neutrally, and career advancement depending on technical qualifications judged by organisations.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) While recognising bureaucracy as the most efficient form of organisation and even indispensable for the modern state, Weber also saw it as a threat to individual freedoms and the ongoing bureaucratisation as leading to a "polar night of icy darkness", in which increasing rationalisation of human life trapped individuals in the aforementioned "iron cage" of bureaucratic, rule-based, rational control.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) To counteract bureaucrats, the system needed entrepreneurs and politicians.[44]

#### Social stratification

Weber also formulated a three-component theory of stratification, with social class, social status and political party as conceptually distinct elements.[45] The three-component theory of stratification contrasted with Karl Marx simpler theory of social class that ties all social stratification to what people own. In Weber's theory, issues of honour and prestige were important. This distinction was most clearly described in Weber's essay "The Distribution of Power Within the Gemeinschaft: Classes, Stände, Parties", which was first published in his book Economy and Society.[46]

The three components of Weber's theory are:[46]

1. Social class – Based on an economically determined relationship with the market
2. Status (Stand) – Based on non-economic qualities such as honour and prestige
3. Party – Affiliations in the political domain

Weber scholars maintain a sharp distinction between the terms "status" and "class", although non-scholars tend to use them interchangeably in casual use. Status and its focus on honour emerged from the Gemeinschaft, which denoted the part of society where loyalty originated from. Class emerged from the Gesellschaft, a subdivision of the Gemeinschaft that included rationally driven markets and legal organisation. Party emerged from a combination of the two.[47] Weber interpreted "life chances", the opportunities to improve one's life, as having been a definitional aspect of class. It related to the differences in access to opportunities that different people might have had in their lives.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Study of the city

The origin of a rational and inner-worldly ethic is associated in the Occident with the appearance of thinkers and prophets … who developed in a social context that was alien to the Asiatic cultures. This context consisted of the political problems engendered by the bourgeois status-group of the city, without which neither Judaism, nor Christianity, nor the development of Hellenistic thinking are conceivable.

—Max Weber in The City, 1921.[48]

As part of his overarching effort to understand the unique development of the Western world, Weber produced a detailed general study of the city as the characteristic locus of the social and economic relations, political arrangements, and ideas that eventually came to define the West. This resulted in a monograph, The City.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) According to Weber, the city as a politically autonomous organisation of people living in close proximity, employed in a variety of specialised trades, and physically separated from the surrounding countryside. That structure only fully developed in the West and significantly shaped its cultural evolution.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber argued that Judaism, early Christianity, theology, and later the political party and modern science, were only possible in the urban context that reached a full development in the West alone.[49] He also saw in the history of medieval European cities the rise of a unique form of "non-legitimate domination" that successfully challenged the existing forms of legitimate domination (traditional, charismatic, and rational-legal) that had prevailed until then in the Medieval world.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Economics

Weber regarded himself primarily as an economist, and all his professorial appointments were in economics, though today his contributions in that field are largely overshadowed by his role as a founder of modern sociology.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) As a political economist and economic historian, Weber belonged to the German historical school of economics, represented by academics such as Gustav von Schmoller and his student Werner Sombart.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) However, even though Weber's research interests were very much in line with this school, his views on methodology and marginal utility diverged significantly from those of other German historicists. Instead, they were closer to those of Carl Menger and the Austrian school, the traditional rivals of the historical school.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The division caused by the Methodenstreit caused Weber to support a broad interpretation of economics that combined economic theory, economic history, and economic sociology in the form of Sozialökonomik [de] ("social economics").[50]

#### Economy and Society

Main page: Organization:Economy and Society

A page from the manuscript of the sociology of law within Economy and Society

Weber's magnum opus Economy and Society is an essay collection that he was working on at the time of his death in 1920. After his death, the final organisation and editing of the book fell to his widow Marianne. The final German form published in 1922 reflected Marianne's editorial work and intellectual commitment.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The composition includes a wide range of essays dealing with Weber's views regarding sociology, social philosophy, politics, social stratification, world religion, diplomacy, and other subjects.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Beginning in 1956, the German jurist Johannes Winckelmann began editing and organising the German edition of Economy and Society based on his study of the papers that Weber left at his death. English versions of the work were published as a collected volume in 1968, as edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. As a result of the various editions in German and English, there are differences between the organisation of the different volumes.[51]

#### Methodological individualism

While his research interests placed a strong emphasis on interpreting economic history, Weber's support of methodological individualism represented a break with the historical school and an agreement with the founder of the Austrian school of economics, Carl Menger, in the Methodenstreit ("debate over methods").({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The phrase "methodological individualism", which came into common usage in modern debates regarding the connection between microeconomics and macroeconomics, was coined by the Austrian-American economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1908 as a way of referring to the views of Weber.[12] Despite the usage of "individualism" in the term, Weber did not interpret the individual as being the true source for sociological explanations. Instead, while only individuals could engage in intentional action, they were not necessarily separate from the collective group.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He interpreted methodological individualism as having had close proximity to verstehende ("interpretive") sociology, as actions can be interpreted subjectively. Similarly, it is also related to ideal types in that it involves discussions of abstract and rational models of human behaviour.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

#### Marginal utility

Unlike other historicists, Weber accepted Marginal utility and taught it to his students.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber's overall economic sociology was based on it.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In 1908, Weber published an article, "Marginal Utility Theory and 'The Fundamental Law of Psychophysics'", in which he drew a sharp methodological distinction between psychology and economics and attacked the claims that the marginal theory of value in economics reflected the form of the psychological response to stimuli as described by the Weber–Fechner law. This article was also a rejection of the dependence of the economic theory of value on the laws of psychophysics.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber also included a similar discussion of marginal utility theory in the second chapter of Economy and Society. Both marginal utility theory and declining utility's roles in his writings were implied through his usage of instrumentally rational action that chapter.[52]

#### Economic calculation

Like his colleague Werner Sombart, Weber regarded economic calculation, and especially the double-entry bookkeeping method of business accounting, as one of the most important forms of the rationalisation that was associated with the development of modern capitalism.[53] Weber's preoccupation with the importance of economic calculation led him to critique socialism as a system that lacked a mechanism for allocating resources efficiently to satisfy human needs.[54] Otto Neurath, a socialist thinker, thought that prices would not exist and central planners would use in-kind, rather than monetary, economic calculation in a completely socialised economy.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) According to Weber, this type of coordination was inefficient because it was incapable of solving the problem of imputation, which related to the difficulties in accurately determining the relative values of capital goods.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber wrote that, under full socialism, the value of goods had to be determined. However, there was no clear method for doing so in that economic system. Planned economies were, therefore, irrational.[55] This argument against socialism was made independently, at about the same time, by Ludwig von Mises.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber himself had a significant influence on Mises, whom he had befriended when they were both at the University of Vienna in the spring of 1918. However, Mises ultimately regarded him as having been a historian, rather than an economist.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

## Inspirations

Immanuel Kant and Karl Marx, two of Max Weber's influences

Max Weber was strongly influenced by German idealism, particularly by neo-Kantianism. He was exposed to it by Heinrich Rickert, who was his professorial colleague at the University of Freiburg.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Especially important to Weber's work is the neo-Kantian belief that reality was essentially chaotic and incomprehensible, with all rational order deriving from the way the human mind focused attention on certain aspects of reality and organised the resulting perceptions.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber's opinions regarding the methodology of the social sciences showed parallels with the work of contemporary neo-Kantian philosopher and pioneering sociologist Georg Simmel.[56] Weber was also influenced by Kantian ethics more generally, which he nonetheless came to think of as obsolete in a modern age lacking in religious certainties.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His interpretation of Kant and neo-Kantianism was pessimistic as a result.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Weber was responding to the effect that Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy had on modern thought. His goal in the field of ethics was to find freedom that was not arbitrarily defined in what he interpreted as an age that moved past metaphysics. That represented a division between the parts of his thought that represented Kantianism and Nietzscheanism.[57] After his debate with Oswald Spengler in 1920, Weber was recorded as having said that the world was largely intellectually influenced by Nietzsche and Marx.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism and "Science as a Vocation", Weber negatively described "die 'letzten Menschen'" ("the 'last men'"), who were Nietzschean "specialists without spirit" who Weber warned about in both texts.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Similarly, he also used Nietzsche's concept of ressentiment in his discussion of theodicy, but he interpreted it differently. Weber disliked Nietzsche's emotional approach to the subject and did not interpret it as having been a type of slave morality that was derived from Judaism.[58]

While a student in Charlottenburg, Weber read all forty volumes by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who later exerted an influence over his methodology and concepts.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) For Weber, Goethe was one of the seminal figures in German history.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) In his writings, including The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber quoted Goethe on several occasions.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) His usage of "electoral affinity" in his writings may have been derived from Goethe, as it had been used as the title of one of Goethe's works.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Weber was also influenced by Goethe's usage of the Greek daimon ("fate"). That concept influenced Weber's perspective that one's fate was inevitable and that one was able to use experience to create intellectual passion.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He thought that Goethe, his Faust, and Nietzsche's Zarathustra were figures that represented the Übermensch and expressed the quality of human action by ceaselessly striving for knowledge.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

Another major influence in Weber's life was the writings of Karl Marx and the workings of socialist thought in academia and active politics.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) While he shared some of Marx's consternation with bureaucratic systems and maligned them as having been capable of advancing their own logic to the detriment of human freedom and autonomy, Weber viewed conflict as perpetual and inevitable and did not host the spirit of a materially available utopia.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Writing in 1932, Karl Löwith contrasted the work of Marx and Weber, arguing that both were interested in the causes and effects of Western capitalism, but they viewed it through different lenses. Marx viewed capitalism through the lens of alienation, while Weber used the concept of rationalisation to interpret it.[59] Weber also expanded Marx's interpretation of alienation from the specific idea of the worker who was alienated from his work to similar situations that involved intellectuals and bureaucrats.[60] Scholars during the Cold War frequently interpreted Weber as having been "a bourgeois answer to Marx", but he was actually responding to the issues that were relevant to the bourgeoisie in Wilhelmine Germany. In that regard, he focused on the conflict between rationality and irrationality.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

## Legacy

Weber's most influential work was on economic sociology, political sociology, and the sociology of religion. Along with Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim, he is commonly regarded as one of the founders of modern sociology.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) He was instrumental in developing an antipositivist, hermeneutic, tradition in the social sciences.[61] Weber influenced many scholars across the political spectrum. Left-leaning social theorists, such as Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, György Lukács and Jürgen Habermas were influenced by his discussion of modernity and its friction with modernization.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) As part of that, his analysis of modernity and rationalisation significantly influenced the critical theory associated with the Frankfurt School.[62] Right-leaning scholars, including Carl Schmitt, Joseph Schumpeter, Leo Strauss, Hans Morgenthau, and Raymond Aron, emphasised different elements of his thought. They placed importance on his discussion of strong leaders in democracy, political ethic's relationship with value-freedom and value-relativism, and combatting bureaucracy through politically based struggle.[57] The scholars who have examined his works philosophically, including Strauss, Hans Henrik Bruun, and Alfred Schütz, have traditionally looked at them through the lens of Continental philosophy.[63]

### Weber studies

Weberian scholarship's beginnings were delayed by the ongoing disruption of academic life in the Weimar Republic. Hyper-inflation caused Weber's support for parliamentary democracy to be countered by the decline the respect that professors had for it. The alienation that they experienced from politics caused many of them to become pessimistic and closer to the historical viewpoints espoused by Oswald Spengler in his The Decline of the West.[64] Furthermore, universities were coming under increased state control and influence. After the Nazi Party took power, that process accelerated. The previously dominant style of sociology, that of Alfred Vierkandt and Leopold von Wiese, was largely replaced by a sociology that was dominated by support for the Nazis. Hans Freyer and Othmar Spann were representative of that movement, while Werner Sombart moved towards support for collectivism. The rise of the Nazi Party had relegated Weber's scholarship to a marginal position in the Germany academy. However, some Weberian scholars had left Germany while this process was going on, with most of them settling in the United States and the United Kingdom.[65]

These scholars began to involve themselves in American and British scholarship at a time when Weber's writings, such as the General Economic History, were beginning to be translated into English. Talcott Parsons, an American scholar, was influenced by his readings of Weber and Sombart as a student in Germany during the 1920s. He obtained permission from Marianne Weber to publish a translation of The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism in his 1930 essay collection, the Collected Essays on the Sociology of Religion. This translated version, which was heavily edited by the publisher, was not initially successful.[66] Parsons had been using this translation as part of his effort to create an academic sociology, which resulted in his 1937 book the Structure of Social Action. In it, Parson's argued that Weber and Durkheim were foundational figures in sociology. His book was not successful until after the Second World War. He then published a translation of Economy and Society as The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. His increasing prominence as a scholar led to this volume's own elevated influence. Other translations began to appear, including C. Wright Mills and Hans Gerth's [de] From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology in 1946. Their volume was a collection of excerpts from Weber's writings. In the last year of the decade, Edward Shils edited a translation of Weber's Collected Essays on Methodology, which was published as The Methodology of the Social Sciences.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

As the 1940s ended, Max Weber's reputation as a scholar had been rising through its interpretation through the lenses of Parsons's structural functionalism and Mills's conflict theory.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) Over the course of the next few decades, continued publications of translated versions of Weber's works began to appear, including ones on law, religion, music, and the city. Despite the flawed nature of many of the translations, it became possible to obtain a largely complete view of Weber's scholarship. That was still impeded by the unorganised way in which the translations were published, which prevented scholars from knowing the connections between the different texts. In 1968, a complete translation of Economy and Society in the way that it was prepared by Marianne Weber was published.[67] While an interpretation of Weber that was separate from Parson's structural functionalism had begun with From Max Weber, a more political and historical interpretation was forwarded by Reinhard Bendix's 1948 Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, Ralf Dahrendorf's 1957 Class and Conflict in an Industrial Society, and John Rex's 1962 Key Problems in Sociological Theory. Raymond Aron's interpretation of Weber in his 1965 text, Main Currents in Sociological Thought, gave an alternative to Parson's perspective on the history of sociology. Weber, while still integral to it, was being framed as one of the three foundational figures, the other two were Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim. Anthony Giddens solidified that interpretation of the three scholars with the publication of his Capitalism and Modern Social Theory in 1971. After the end of the 1970s, more of Weber's less prominent publications began to be published. That effort coincided with the continued writings of critical commentaries on his works and idea, including the creation of a scholarly journal in 2000, Max Weber Studies, that is devoted to such scholarship.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})

### Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe

The idea of publishing a collected edition of Max Weber's complete works was pushed forward by Horst Baier in 1972. A year later, the Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe [de], a multi-volume set of all of Max Weber's writings, began to take shape.[68] Wolfgang J. Mommsen, Wolfgang Schluchter, Johannes Winckelmann [de], M. Rainer Lepsius, and Horst Baier [de] were the initial editors. After Mommsen's death in 2004, Gangolf Hübinger [de] succeeded him. Winckelmann, Lepsius, and Baier also died before the completion of the project.[69] The writings were organised in a combination of chronological order and by subject, with the material that was not intended to be published by Weber in purely chronological order. The final editions of each text were used, with the exception of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, which was published in both its first and final forms.[70] Mohr Siebeck was selected to publish the volumes.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) The project was presented to the academic community in 1981 with the publication of a prospectus that was colloquially referred to as the "green brochure". It outlined the three sections of the series: "Writings and Speeches", "Letters", and "Lecture Manuscripts and Lecture Notes".[71] Four years later, the project entered publication.({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) It concluded in June 2020 and contains forty-seven volumes, including two index volumes.[72]

## Bibliography

## See also

* Interpretations of Max Weber's liberalism
* Sociology of law
* Speeches of Max Weber

## Citations

1. ↑ Kaesler 1988, pp. 2–3.
2. ↑ Kaelber 2003, pp. 30–33.
3. ↑ Radkau 2009, p. 564.
4. ↑ Kaelber 2003, pp. 39–40.
5. ↑ Weber 2013, pp. xviii, xxxii–xxxiii.
6. ↑ Radkau 2009, pp. 191–192.
7. ↑ Radkau 2009, pp. 507–508.
8. ↑ Mommsen & Steinberg 1984, pp. 327–328.
9. ↑ Denhardt 2010, p. 27.
10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Sibeon 2004, pp. 37–38.
11. ↑ Weber 1994, p. 321.
12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Heath 2020.
13. ↑ Beiser 2011, pp. 527–529, 546.
14. ↑ Allan 2005, p. 153.
15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Allan 2005, p. 148.
16. ↑ Allan 2005, p. 151.
17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Allan 2005, p. 162.
18. ↑ Weigert 1991, p. 110.
19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 Habermas 1990, pp. 1–2.
20. ↑ Josephson Storm 2017, pp. 299–300.
21. ↑ Allan 2005, pp. 151–152.
22. ↑ Radkau 2009, pp. 370–371.
23. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, p. 285.
24. ↑ Allan 2005, pp. 154–155.
25. ↑ Allan 2005, p. 158.
26. ↑ Weber 2013, pp. 15–16.
27. ↑ Ritzer 2009, pp. 35–37.
28. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, p. 57.
29. ↑ Swedberg & Agevall 2016, pp. 10–12.
30. ↑ Weber 1968, pp. ix–xi.
31. ↑ Kalberg 2017, pp. 238–240.
32. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, pp. 198–199.
33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 Bendix & Roth 1977, pp. 200–201.
34. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, pp. 204–205.
35. ↑ Christiano, Swatos & Kivisto 2008, pp. 142–143.
36. ↑ Warner 1991, pp. 9–10.
37. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, p. 296.
38. ↑ Ritzer 2009, pp. 37–41.
39. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, pp. 303–305.
40. ↑ Ritzer 2009, pp. 38–42.
41. ↑ Sashkin & Sashkin 2003, p. 52.
42. ↑ Hooghe 2001, p. 40.
43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Allan 2005, pp. 172–176.
44. ↑ Swedberg & Agevall 2016, pp. 18–21.
45. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, pp. 85–87.
46. ↑ 46.0 46.1 Weber 2015b, pp. 37–58.
47. ↑ Waters & Waters 2016, pp. 1–2.
48. ↑ Bendix & Roth 1977, pp. 79.
49. ↑ Swedberg & Agevall 2016, p. 283.
50. ↑ Swedberg & Agevall 2016, p. 103.
51. ↑ Roth 2016, pp. 250–253.
52. ↑ Parsons 2007, pp. 235–238.
53. ↑ Swedberg & Agevall 2016, pp. 22–23.
54. ↑ Tribe 2009, pp. 157–158.
55. ↑ Hülsmann 2007, pp. 392–396.
56. ↑ Frisby 2002, p. 46.
57. ↑ 57.0 57.1 Kim 2022.
58. ↑ Adair-Toteff 2013, pp. 99–102.
59. ↑ Löwith & Turner 1993, p. 34.
60. ↑ Albrow 1990, p. 108.
61. ↑ Rhoads 2010, p. 40.
62. ↑ Löwy 1996, pp. 431–446.
63. ↑ Turner 2007, p. 39.
64. ↑ Scott 2019, p. 179.
65. ↑ Scott 2019, pp. 179–180.
66. ↑ Scott 2019, p. 180.
67. ↑ Scott 2019, pp. 182–183.
68. ↑ Hanke, Hübinger & Schwentker 2012, pp. 65–70.
69. ↑ Lichtblau 2022, pp. 74–76.
70. ↑ Lichtblau 2022, pp. 79–81.
71. ↑ Hanke, Hübinger & Schwentker 2012, p. 84.
72. ↑ Lichtblau 2022, pp. 74–75.

## General and cited sources

* Adair-Toteff, Christopher (January 2014). "Max Weber Gesamtausgabe: Interim Report and Future Volumes". Max Weber Studies 14 (1): 113–118. doi:10.1353/max.2014.a808725. Project MUSE 808725. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Adair-Toteff, Christopher (January 2013). "'Sinn der Welt': Max Weber and the Problem of Theodicy" (in en). Max Weber Studies 13 (1): 87–107. doi:10.1353/max.2013.a808748. Project MUSE 808748. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Albrow, Martin (1990) (in en). Max Weber's Construction of Social Theory (First ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20879-1. ISBN 978-1-349-20879-1. OCLC 21195542.
* Allan, Kenneth D. (2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5. OCLC 1034668313. https://archive.org/details/explorationsincl00alla.
* Baehr, Peter (2002). Founders, Classics, Canons: Modern Disputes over the Origins and Appraisal of Sociology's Heritage (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203791615. ISBN 978-0-203-79161-5. OCLC 1306503294.
* Baehr, Peter (2001). "The 'Iron Cage' and the 'Shell as Hard as Steel': Parsons, Weber, and the Stahlhartes Gehäuse Metaphor in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism". History and Theory 40 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1111/0018-2656.00160. ISSN 0018-2656.
* Barker, Martin (June 1980). "Kant as a Problem for Weber". The British Journal of Sociology 31 (2): 224–245. doi:10.2307/589689. ISSN 0007-1315.
* Beiser, Frederick C. (2011). "Max Weber and the End of the Historicist Tradition". The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford University Press. pp. 511–567. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691555.003.0014. ISBN 978-0-19-969155-5. OCLC 751726167.
* Bellah, Robert N. (June 1999). "Max Weber and World-Denying Love: A Look at the Historical Sociology of Religion". Journal of the American Academy of Religion 67 (2): 277–304. doi:10.1093/jaarel/67.2.277. ISSN 0002-7189. http://www.robertbellah.com/articles_3.htm.
* Bendix, Reinhard; Roth, Guenther (1977). Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4. OCLC 1150290821. https://archive.org/details/maxweberintellec0000bend.
* Berman, Harold J.; Reid, Charles J. Jr. (2000). "Max Weber as Legal Historian". in Turner, Stephen. The Cambridge Companion to Weber. The Cambridge Companions to Philosophy and Religion (First ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 221–239. doi:10.1017/CCOL9780521561495.013. ISBN 978-0-521-56149-5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-weber/max-weber-as-legal-historian/E0C885604B8E7ED34483BC30F2525BAF.
* Boehmer, Konrad (2001). "Weber, Max". in Sadie, Stanley (in en). The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 27 (Second ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 177–178. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.29991. ISBN 978-0-333-60800-5. OCLC 777335845. https://archive.org/details/newgrovedictiona0027unse/page/176/mode/2up.
* Bruhns, Hinnerk (December 2018). "Max Weber and the Problem of a 'Successful Peace'" (in en). Simmel Studies 22 (2): 35–70. doi:10.7202/1058557ar. ISSN 1616-2552. https://simmelstudies.org/index.php/simmel_studies/article/view/15.
* Callison, William (April 2022). "The Politics of Rationality in Early Neoliberalism: Max Weber, Ludwig von Mises, and the Socialist Calculation Debate". Journal of the History of Ideas 83 (2): 269–291. doi:10.1353/jhi.2022.0013. ISSN 0022-5037. PMID 35603614.
* Cat, Jordi (2023). "Otto Neurath". in Zalta, Edward N.. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. OCLC 37550526. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/neurath/.
* Christiano, Kevin J.; Swatos, William H. Jr.; Kivisto, Peter (2008). Sociology of Religion: Contemporary Developments (Second ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. ISBN 978-0-7425-6111-3. OCLC 183926380. https://books.google.com/books?id=wzJBcx6YjWgC.
* Craig, Gordon A. (18 February 1988). "The Kaiser and the Kritik" (in en). The New York Review of Books 35 (2). ISSN 0028-7504. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1988/02/18/the-kaiser-and-the-kritik/.
* Demm, Eberhard (January 2017). "Max and Alfred Weber and Their Female Entourage". Max Weber Studies 17 (1): 64–91. doi:10.1353/max.2017.a808647. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Denhardt, Robert B. (2010). Theories of Public Organization. Boston: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-4390-8623-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=0mt5MF9EBJgC.
* Eliaeson, Sven (January 1990). "Influences on Max Weber's Methodology". Acta Sociologica 33 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1177/000169939003300102. ISSN 0001-6993.
* Farrenkopf, John (October 1992). "Weber, Spengler, and the Origins, Spirit, and Development of Capitalism". Comparative Civilizations Review 27 (27): 1–30. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol27/iss27/2/.
* Fish, Jonathan S. (2017) (in en). Defending the Durkheimian Tradition: Religion, Emotion and Morality. Rethinking Classical Sociology (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315258348. ISBN 978-1-315-25834-8. OCLC 60543408.
* Frisby, David (2002). Georg Simmel. Key Sociologists (Second ed.). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203520185. ISBN 978-0-415-28535-3. OCLC 83780447.
* Frommer, Jörg; Frommer, Sabine (May 1993). "Max Webers Krankheit - soziologische Aspekte der depressiven Struktur" (in de). Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie 61 (5): 161–171. doi:10.1055/s-2007-999084. ISSN 0720-4299. PMID 8319927.
* Gane, Nicholas (2002). Max Weber and Postmodern Theory: Rationalization versus Re-enchantment. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230502512. ISBN 978-0-333-93058-8. OCLC 48399032. http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7315/.
* Gellner, David (November 1982). "Max Weber, Capitalism and the Religion of India" (in en). Sociology 16 (4): 526–543. doi:10.1177/0038038582016004004. ISSN 0038-0385.
* Gordon, Peter E. (11 June 2020). "Max the Fatalist" (in en). The New York Review of Books 67 (10). ISSN 0028-7504. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/06/11/max-weber-fatalist/.
* Habermas, Jürgen (1990) (in en-US). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-58102-8. OCLC 263623304. https://books.google.com/books?id=6dZybIvETTwC.
* Hanke, Edith; Hübinger, Gangolf; Schwentker, Wolfgang (January 2012). "The Genesis of the Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe and the Contribution of Wolfgang J. Mommsen". Max Weber Studies 12 (1): 59–94. doi:10.1353/max.2012.a808787. Project MUSE 808787. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Heath, Joseph (2020). "Methodological Individualism". in Zalta, Edward N.. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. OCLC 3755052. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/methodological-individualism/.
* Hanke, Edith (September 2009). "'Max Weber's Desk is now my Altar': Marianne Weber and the Intellectual Heritage of Her Husband" (in en). History of European Ideas 35 (3): 349–359. doi:10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2009.01.003. ISSN 0191-6599.
* Hobsbawm, Eric (1987). The Age of Empire, 1875–1914. History of Civilization (First ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 978-0-394-56319-0. OCLC 1024158611. https://archive.org/details/ageofempire1875100hobs.
* Honigsheim, Paul (2017). Sica, Alan. ed. The Unknown Max Weber (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351302241. ISBN 978-1-351-30224-1. OCLC 1000454719.
* Hooghe, Liesbet (2001). The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491979. ISBN 978-0-521-00143-4. OCLC 52497075. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/european-commission-and-the-integration-of-europe/1F444A2B18FF21C3C04D6580B5F6D88B.
* Hülsmann, Jörg Guido (2007). Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism. Auburn, Alabama: Mises Institute. ISBN 978-1-933550-18-3. OCLC 173847313. https://books.google.com/books?id=it9c6z4bw_8C.
* Josephson Storm, Jason (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226403533.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-226-40336-6. OCLC 979417616. https://academic.oup.com/chicago-scholarship-online/book/22973.
* Kaelber, Lutz (May 2003). "Max Weber's Dissertation" (in en). History of the Human Sciences 16 (2): 27–56. doi:10.1177/0952695103016002002. ISSN 0952-6951.
* Kaesler, Dirk (1988) (in en). Max Weber: An Introduction to His Life and Work. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-42560-3. OCLC 18167075. https://archive.org/details/maxweberintroduc0000kasl_p3m5.
* Kaesler, Dirk (2014) (in de). Max Weber. Preuße, Denker, Muttersohn. Eine Biographie (First ed.). Munich: C. H. Beck. ISBN 978-3-406-66076-4. OCLC 878146290. https://books.google.com/books?id=Pa8kAwAAQBAJ.
* Kalberg, Stephen (July 2017). "Reconstructing Weber's Indian Rationalism: A Comparative Analysis" (in en). Max Weber Studies 17 (2): 235–253. doi:10.1353/max.2017.a808620. Project MUSE 808620. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Kent, Stephen A. (Winter 1983). "Weber, Goethe, and the Nietzschean Allusion: Capturing the Source of the 'Iron Cage' Metaphor". Sociological Analysis 44 (4): 297–319. doi:10.2307/3711612.
* Kim, Sung Ho (2022). "Max Weber". in Zalta, Edward N.. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. OCLC 37550526. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/weber/.
* Kolev, Stefan (March 2020). "The Legacy of Max Weber and the Early Austrians" (in en). The Review of Austrian Economics 33 (1–2): 33–54. doi:10.1007/s11138-019-00445-0. ISSN 0889-3047.
* Lachmann, Ludwig (2007). The Legacy of Max Weber: Three Essays. Auburn, Alabama: Mises Institute. ISBN 978-1-61016-072-8. OCLC 861755404. https://books.google.com/books?id=pxAlydwrvcAC.
* Lepsius, M. Rainer (January 2004). "Mina Tobler and Max Weber: Passion Confined". Max Weber Studies 4 (1): 9–21. doi:10.15543/MWS/2004/1/3. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Lengermann, Patricia; Niebrugge-Brantley, Jill (1998). The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830–1930: A Text/Reader. Boston: McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-037169-9. OCLC 37761947.
* Levy, Carl (2016). "Max Weber, Anarchism and Libertarian Culture: Personality and Power Politics". in Whimster, Sam (in en). Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 83–109. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-27030-9_4. ISBN 978-1-349-27030-9. OCLC 37843746.
* Lichtblau, Klaus (January 2022). "On the Conclusion of the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe: A Meta-Critical Review". Max Weber Studies 22 (1): 74–124. doi:10.1353/max.2022.0004. Project MUSE 862056. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Löwith, Karl; Turner, Bryan S. (1993). Max Weber and Karl Marx. Routledge Classics in Sociology (First ed.). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203422229. ISBN 0-585-44764-0. OCLC 52423743.
* Löwy, Michael (June 1996). "Figures of Weberian Marxism". Theory and Society 25 (3): 431–446. doi:10.1007/BF00158264. ISSN 0304-2421.
* Löwy, Michael; Varikas, Eleni (July 2022). "Max Weber and Anarchism" (in en). Max Weber Studies 22 (2): 94–109. doi:10.1353/max.2022.0011. Project MUSE 862085. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Macionis, John J. (2012). Sociology (Fourteenth ed.). Boston: Pearson. ISBN 978-0-205-11671-3. OCLC 1024274649.
* Marlin, Randal (2002). Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press. ISBN 978-1-55111-376-0. OCLC 49602821. https://books.google.com/books?id=Zp38Ot2g7LEC.
* Mass, Harro (December 2009). "Disciplining Boundaries: Lionel Robbins, Max Weber, and the Borderlands of Economics, History, and Psychology". Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (4): 500–517. doi:10.1017/S1053837209990289.
* Mayer, Carl (Winter 1975). "Max Weber's Interpretation of Karl Marx". Social Research 42 (4): 701–719. ISSN 0037-783X.
* McKinnon, Andrew M. (March 2010). "Elective Affinities of the Protestant Ethic: Weber and the Chemistry of Capitalism". Sociological Theory 28 (1): 108–126. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01367.x. ISSN 0735-2751. https://aura-test.abdn.ac.uk/handle/2164/3035.
* Maclachlan, Fiona (July 2017). "Max Weber Within the Methodenstreit" (in en). Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (4): 1161–1175. doi:10.1093/cje/bew051. ISSN 0309-166X.
* Mises, Ludwig von; Hayek, Friedrich (2009) (in en). Memoirs. Auburn, Alabama: Mises Institute. ISBN 978-1-61016-393-4. OCLC 456291128. https://books.google.com/books?id=PbIttfIZw_cC.
* Mommsen, Wolfgang J.; Steinberg, Michael (1984). Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-53399-5. OCLC 1150275007. https://archive.org/details/maxwebergermanpo0000momm.
* Mommsen, Wolfgang J. (1992). The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber: Collected Essays. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-53400-8. OCLC 839996440. https://books.google.com/books?id=kgF9bjMoocYC.
* Oakes, Guy; Vidich, Arthur J. (March 1999). "Gerth, Mills, and Shils: The Origins of From Max Weber". International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 12 (3): 399–433. doi:10.1023/A:1025920914039.
* Palonen, Kari (January 2011). "The State as a 'Chance' Concept: Max Weber's De-substantialisation and Neutralisation of the Concept" (in en). Max Weber Studies 11 (1): 99–117. doi:10.1353/max.2011.a808798. Project MUSE 808798. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Parsons, Stephen D. (July 2007). "Marginalizing Weber: A Critical Note". Max Weber Studies 7 (2): 231–242. doi:10.1353/max.2007.a808886. Project MUSE 808886. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Petersen, William (2017) (in en). Against the Stream: Reflections of an Unconventional Demographer (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315082844. ISBN 978-1-315-08284-4. OCLC 994145659. https://books.google.com/books?id=pS0rDwAAQBAJ.
* Plye, Ralph E.; Davidson, James D. (1998). "Stratification". in Swatos, William H. Jr.. Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press. pp. 498–501. ISBN 978-0-7619-8956-1. OCLC 37361790. http://hirr.hartsem.edu/ency/stratification.htm.
* Poggi, Gianfranco (2006). Weber: A Short Introduction. Cambridge: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-3489-0. OCLC 60794418. https://books.google.com/books?id=c5a2LWRh7uEC.
* Radkau, Joachim (2009). Max Weber: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-4147-8. OCLC 721625601. https://books.google.com/books?id=6VDjAQAAQBAJ.
* Rhoads, John K. (2010) (in en). Critical Issues in Social Theory. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press. ISBN 978-0-271-04005-9. OCLC 1162042882. https://books.google.com/books?id=XVhOtKF3fKsC.
* Ritzer, George (2005). Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press. ISBN 978-0-7619-8819-9. OCLC 654326665. http://archive.org/details/enchantingdisenc0000ritz_r0g1.
* Ritzer, George (2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics (Second ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. OCLC 555900314.
* Roth, Guenther (September 1976). "History and Sociology in the Work of Max Weber". The British Journal of Sociology 27 (3): 306–318. doi:10.2307/589618. ISSN 0007-1315.
* Roth, Guenther (July 2016). "On Behalf of Economy and Society and Himself". Max Weber Studies 16 (2): 250–253. doi:10.1353/max.2016.a808671. Project MUSE 808671. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Roth, Guenther (January 2005). "Transatlantic Connections: A Cosmopolitan Context for Max and Marianne Weber's New York Visit 1904". Max Weber Studies 5 (1): 81–112. doi:10.1353/max.2005.a808950. Project MUSE 808950. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Sashkin, Marshall; Sashkin, Molly G. (2003). Leadership That Matters: The Critical Factors for Making a Difference in People's Lives and Organizations' Success (First ed.). Oakland, California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. ISBN 978-1-57675-193-0. OCLC 243594680. https://archive.org/details/leadershipthatma0000sash.
* Sahni, Isher-Paul (May 2001). "'The Will to Act': An Analysis of Max Weber's Conceptualisation of Social Action and Political Ethics in the Light of Goethe's Fiction". Sociology 35 (2): 421–439. doi:10.1177/S0038038501000207. ISSN 0038-0385.
* Scaff, Lawrence A. (1989). Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture, Politics, and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06435-5. OCLC 1034677915. http://archive.org/details/fleeingironcagec00scaf.
* Scaff, Lawrence A. (2011). Max Weber in America. Princeton University Press. pp. 11–24. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691147796.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-691-14779-6. OCLC 845249089.
* Schluchter, Wolfgang (January 2014). "'How Ideas become Effective in History': Max Weber on Confucianism and Beyond". Max Weber Studies 14 (1): 11–31. doi:10.1353/max.2014.a808751. Project MUSE 808751. ISSN 1470-8078. http://interamerica.de/current-issue/schluchter/.
* Schluchter, Wolfgang (January 2018). "The Two Great Heterodoxies in Ancient India: An Example of Max Weber's Anti-Hegelian Approach". Max Weber Studies 18 (1): 87–106. doi:10.1353/max.2018.a808609. Project MUSE 808609. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Schweitzer, Arthur (September 1975). "Frank Knight's Social Economics". History of Political Economy 7 (3): 279–292. doi:10.1215/00182702-7-3-279. ISSN 0018-2702. https://read.dukeupress.edu/hope/article-abstract/7/3/279/12826/Frank-Knight-s-Social-Economics.
* Scott, John (2019) (in en). The Emerald Guide to Max Weber. Emerald Guides to Social Thought. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. doi:10.1108/9781787691896. ISBN 978-1-78769-192-6. OCLC 1088436694.
* Sibeon, Roger (2004). Rethinking Social Theory (First ed.). London: SAGE Publishing. doi:10.4135/9781446216989. ISBN 978-0-7619-5069-1. OCLC 646696725. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/rethinking-social-theory.
* Sica, Alan (2017). Max Weber and the New Century (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203786079. ISBN 978-0-203-78607-9. OCLC 1004354573.
* Smith, David Norman (October 2019). "Max Weber's Odyssey: The Wild West, the Frontier, and the Capitalist Spirit". Fast Capitalism 16 (2): 95–105. doi:10.32855/fcapital.201902.009. ISSN 1930-014X. https://fastcapitalism.journal.library.uta.edu/index.php/fastcapitalism/article/view/170.
* Spengler, Oswald; Hughes, H. Stuart (1991). Werner, Helmut. ed (in en). The Decline of the West: An Abridged Edition. Oxford Paperbacks. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-506634-0. OCLC 625153554. https://archive.org/details/declineofwest00spen_0.
* Stigler, George (August 1950). "The Development of Utility Theory". The Journal of Political Economy 58 (5): 373–396. doi:10.1086/256980.
* Swedberg, Richard (October 1999). "Max Weber as an Economist and as a Sociologist: Towards a Fuller Understanding of Weber's View of Economics". American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58 (4): 561–582. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1999.tb03385.x. ISSN 0002-9246.
* Swedberg, Richard; Agevall, Ola (2016). "The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts". The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts (Second ed.). Stanford University Press. doi:10.1515/9781503600225. ISBN 978-1-5036-0022-5. OCLC 956984918. https://books.google.com/books?id=_c3Mcnh8hCgC.
* Thapar, Romila (January 2018). "Revisiting Max Weber's Religion of India". Max Weber Studies 18 (1): 122–139. doi:10.1353/max.2018.a808613. Project MUSE 808613. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Tribe, Keith (January–April 2018). "Max Weber's 'Science as a Vocation': Context, Genesis, Structure" (in en). Sociologica 12 (1): 125–136. doi:10.6092/ISSN.1971-8853/8432. ISSN 1971-8853. https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/8432.
* Tribe, Keith (2009). Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950. Ideas in Context. 33 (First ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511551529. ISBN 978-0-511-55152-9. OCLC 776964689. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/strategies-of-economic-order/730101B09AE32C1570EB5D637844C8FF.
* Turner, Bryan S. (1996). For Weber: Essays on the Sociology of Fate (Second ed.). London: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-0-8039-7633-7. OCLC 47011840. http://archive.org/details/forweberessayson0000turn_o7m8.
* Turner, Bryan S. (February 2011). "Max Weber and the spirit of resentment: The Nietzsche legacy" (in en). Journal of Classical Sociology 11 (1): 75–92. doi:10.1177/1468795X10391458. ISSN 1468-795X.
* Turner, Stephen (January 2007). "The Continued Relevance of Weber's Philosophy of Social Science" (in en). Max Weber Studies 7 (1): 37–62. doi:10.1353/max.2007.a808884. Project MUSE 808884. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Warner, Daniel (1991). An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. ISBN 978-1-55587-266-3. OCLC 44959914. https://archive.org/details/ethicofresponsib0000warn.
* Waters, Tony; Waters, Dagmar (March 2016). "Are the Terms 'Socio-Economic Status' and 'Class Status' a Warped Form of Reasoning for Max Weber?" (in en). Palgrave Communications 2 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.2. ISSN 2055-1045.
* Waters, Tony; Waters, Dagmar (2015a). "Max Weber's Writing as a Product of World War I Europe". in Waters, Tony (in en). Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification (First ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 19–28. doi:10.1057/9781137365866_2. ISBN 978-1-349-47664-0. OCLC 907284212. https://archive.org/details/webersrationalis0000unse/page/18/mode/2up.
* Weber, Max (1978a). Roth, Guenther. ed (in en). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-02824-1. OCLC 1033556249. http://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe.
* Weber, Max (1999). Swedberg, Richard. ed. Essays in Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691218168. ISBN 978-0-691-00906-3. OCLC 40714136. https://books.google.com/books?id=WaV7Q35jy_AC.
* Weber, Max; Turner, Brian S. (2014). Gerth, H. H.. ed (in en). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203759240. ISBN 978-1-134-68894-4. OCLC 880683665.
* Weber, Max; Cohen, Ira J. (2017) (in en). General Economic History (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203790991. ISBN 978-0-203-79099-1. OCLC 1003131149.
* Weber, Max (1994). Blunden, Andy. ed (in en). Sociological Writings (First ed.). New York: Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-0718-4. OCLC 27895448. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/weber.htm.
* Weber, Max (2015b). "The Distribution of Power Within the Gemeinschaft: Classes, Stände, Parties". in Waters, Tony (in en). Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification (First ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 37–58. doi:10.1057/9781137365866_4. ISBN 978-1-349-47664-0. OCLC 907284212. https://archive.org/details/webersrationalis0000unse/page/36/mode/2up.
* Weber, Max (2011). "The Nature of Social Action". in Runciman, Garry. Max Weber: Selections in Translation. Cambridge University Press. pp. 7–32. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511810831.005. ISBN 978-0-511-81083-1. OCLC 858858223. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/max-weber-selections-in-translation/786A193599EDE9EBA91FCC1DFDA5710E/the-nature-of-social-action/8194C77E488956BB6A12A6CAF8219FF4.
* Weber, Max (1964). Baumgarten, Eduard. ed (in de). Max Weber. Werk und Person. Dokumente, ausgewählt und kommentiert von Eduard Baumgarten. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. OCLC 576084885. http://archive.org/details/maxweberwerkundp0000webe.
* Weber, Max (2013). Kalberg, Stephen. ed (in en). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315063645. ISBN 978-1-135-97398-8. OCLC 857081731.
* Weber, Max (1968) (in en). The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. Free Press Paperback (First ed.). Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press. ISBN 978-0-02-934450-7. OCLC 433421.
* Weber, Max (2004). Owen, David. ed. The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-87220-666-3. OCLC 53019391. https://books.google.com/books?id=AHpXbQ6KFDgC.
* Weigert, Andrew J. (1991). Mixed Emotions: Certain Steps Toward Understanding Ambivalence. Albany, New York: SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-0600-7. OCLC 42856306. https://archive.org/details/mixedemotionscer0000weig.
* Whimster, Sam (2016). "Introduction to Weber, Ascona and Anarchism". in Whimster, Sam (in en). Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 83–109. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-27030-9_1. ISBN 978-1-349-27030-9. OCLC 37843746.
* Whimster, Sam (January 2023). "Legitimizing Bureaucracy and the Challenge of Caesarism". Max Weber Studies 23 (1): 82–108. doi:10.1353/max.2023.0006. Project MUSE 877866. ISSN 1470-8078.
* Whimster, Sam (2007) (in en). Understanding Weber (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203030561. ISBN 978-0-203-03056-1. OCLC 71842656.
* Zubaida, Sami (July 2005 – January 2006). "Max Weber's 'The City' and the Islamic City". Max Weber Studies 5–6 (2–1): 111–118. doi:10.1353/max.2006.a808942. Project MUSE 808942. ISSN 1470-8078.

## Further reading

* Adair-Toteff, Christopher (2016) (in en). Max Weber's Sociology of Religion. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. doi:10.1628/978-3-16-154430-9. ISBN 978-3-16-154430-9. OCLC 944309696.
* Bruun, Hans Henrik (2016). Science, Values, and Politics in Max Weber's Methodology: New Expanded Edition. Rethinking Classical Sociology (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315607832. ISBN 978-0-7546-4529-0. OCLC 70839734.
* Collins, Randall (1986). Weberian Sociological Theory (First ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557682. ISBN 978-0-521-30698-0. OCLC 11969995. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/weberian-sociological-theory/BE82F80B36544CA683AB7DE64923B4E2.
* Engisch, Karl, ed (1966). "Max Weber. Gedächtnisschrift der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München zur 100. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages 1964" (in de). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.22722. OCLC 937962. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/22722.
* Gaidenko, Piama (1989). "The Sociology of Max Weber". in Kon, Igor. A History of Classical Sociology. Moscow: Progress Publishers. pp. 255–311. ISBN 978-5-01-001102-4. OCLC 21208496.
* Ghosh, Peter (2008). A Historian Reads Max Weber: Essays on the Protestant Ethic. Kultur- und sozialwissenschaftliche Studien / Studies in Cultural and Social Sciences. 1 (First ed.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. doi:10.2307/j.ctvbkk51w. ISBN 978-3-447-19057-2. OCLC 897645403. https://books.google.com/books?id=7uQf4wF1RrUC.
* Ghosh, Peter (2014). Max Weber and The Protestant Ethic: Twin Histories. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702528.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-870252-8. OCLC 883857262. https://academic.oup.com/book/10463.
* Green, Robert, ed (1959). Protestantism and Capitalism: The Weber Thesis and Its Critics. Problems in European Civilization. 10. Boston: Heath. OCLC 305748.
* Hanke, Edith, ed (2019) (in en). The Oxford Handbook of Max Weber. Oxford Handbooks (First ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679545.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-067954-5. OCLC 1145076376. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34236.
* Hennis, Wilhelm (1988). Max Weber: Essays in Reconstruction. London: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0-04-301301-4. OCLC 1150266196. http://archive.org/details/maxweberessaysin0000henn.
* Jaspers, Karl (1989). Dreijmanis, John. ed. Karl Jaspers on Max Weber (First ed.). New York: Paragon House. ISBN 978-1-55778-130-7. OCLC 1358662687. http://archive.org/details/karljaspersonmax0000jasp.
* Kaube, Jürgen (2014) (in de). Max Weber. Ein Leben zwischen den Epochen. Rowohlt Verlag. ISBN 978-3-644-11611-5. OCLC 869208935.
* Kemple, Thomas (2014). Intellectual Work and the Spirit of Capitalism: Weber's Calling. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137377142. ISBN 978-1-137-37713-5. OCLC 865063421. https://books.google.com/books?id=-VvvngEACAAJ.
* Kim, Sung Ho (2009). Max Weber's Politics of Civil Society (First ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490286. ISBN 978-0-521-82057-8. OCLC 560239693. https://archive.org/details/maxweberspolitic0000kims.
* Kolko, Gabriel (1959). "A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of History". Ethics 70 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1086/291239. ISSN 0014-1704.
* König, René; Winkelmann, Johannes, eds (2013). "Max Weber zum Gedächtnis. Materialien und Dokumente zur Bewertung von Werk und Persönlichkeit" (in de). 7 (First ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-663-04200-6. ISBN 978-3-663-04200-6. OCLC 913704009. https://books.google.com/books?id=m4CrBgAAQBAJ.
* Loewenstein, Karl (1966). Max Weber's Political Ideas in the Perspective of Our Time. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press. OCLC 1036700243. http://archive.org/details/maxweberspolitic00loew.
* Mitzman, Arthur (2017). Ross, Catherine. ed. The Iron Cage: Historical Interpretation of Max Weber (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315132761. ISBN 978-1-315-13276-1. OCLC 1004370078.
* Ritzer, George; Stepnisky, Jeffrey (2022). "Max Weber". Sociological Theory (Eleventh ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. pp. 110–153. ISBN 978-1-5443-5480-4. OCLC 1200834444.
* Roth, Guenther (2001) (in de). Max Webers deutsch-englische Familiengeschichte 1800–1950. Mit Briefen und Dokumenten. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-147557-3. OCLC 47731615. https://books.google.com/books?id=iXbii5ywmDEC.
* Sica, Alan, ed (2016). The Anthem Companion to Max Weber. Anthem Companions to Sociology. London: Anthem Press. ISBN 978-1-78308-379-4. OCLC 959981111. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/anthem-companion-to-max-weber/959A506BDE526BABD61922C7532125AF.
* Sica, Alan, ed (2022) (in en). The Routledge International Handbook on Max Weber. Routledge International Handbooks (First ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003089537. ISBN 978-1-003-08953-7. OCLC 1346316238.
* Swatos, William H. Jr., ed (1990). Time, Place, and Circumstance: Neo-Weberian Studies in Comparative Religious History. New York: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-26892-2. OCLC 988259994. https://archive.org/details/timeplacecircums0000unse.
* Swedberg, Richard (1998). Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691187662. ISBN 978-0-691-07013-1. OCLC 38249866.
* Weber, Marianne (2017) (in en). Max Weber: A Biography (Second ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203786109. ISBN 978-0-203-78610-9. OCLC 1100679706.
* Weber, Max (1969). Rheinstein, Max. ed. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society (Third ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-55651-5. OCLC 468399379. https://archive.org/details/lawineconomysoci0000webe.

## External links

Library resources about
Max Weber

* * *

* Online books
* Resources in your library
* Resources in other libraries

By Max Weber

* Online books
* Resources in your library
* Resources in other libraries

* Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe (in German)
* Max Weber Studies
* Sung Ho Kim. "Max Weber". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weber/.
* Im Fokus: Max Weber at Heidelberg University (in German)
* Newspaper clippings about Max Weber in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW

### Online editions

* Error in Template:Internet Archive author: Max Weber doesn't exist.
* Max Weber at Zeno.org (in German)
* Max Weber at SocioSite
* Works by Max Weber at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)

Articles related to Max Weber

* v
* t
* e

Social and political philosophy

Ancient
philosophers|

* Aristotle
* Chanakya
* Cicero
* Confucius
* Han Fei
* Lactantius
* Laozi
* Mencius
* Mozi
* Origen
* Plato
* Polybius
* Shang
* Socrates
* Sun Tzu
* Tertullian
* Thucydides
* Valluvar
* Xenophon
* Xunzi

Medieval
philosophers|

* Augustine
* Averroes
* Baldus
* Bartolus
* Bruni
* Dante
* Gelasius
* al-Ghazali
* Giles
* Hostiensis
* Ibn Khaldun
* John of Paris
* John of Salisbury
* Latini
* Maimonides
* Marsilius
* Muhammad
* Nizam al-Mulk
* Photios
* Thomas Aquinas
* Wang
* William of Ockham

Early modern
philosophers|

* Beza
* Bodin
* Bossuet
* Botero
* Buchanan
* Calvin
* Cumberland
* Duplessis-Mornay
* Erasmus
* Filmer
* Grotius
* Guicciardini
* Harrington
* Hayashi
* Hobbes
* Hotman
* Huang
* Leibniz
* Locke
* Luther
* Machiavelli
* Malebranche
* Mariana
* Milton
* Montaigne
* More
* Müntzer
* Naudé
* Pufendorf
* Rohan
* Sansovino
* Sidney
* Spinoza
* Suárez

18th–19th-century
philosophers|

* Bakunin
* Bentham
* Bonald
* Bosanquet
* Burke
* Comte
* Constant
* Emerson
* Engels
* Fichte
* Fourier
* Franklin
* Godwin
* Hamann
* Hegel
* Herder
* Hume
* Jefferson
* Justi
* Kant
* political philosophy
* Kierkegaard
* Le Bon
* Le Play
* Maistre
* Marx
* Mazzini
* Mill
* Montesquieu
* Möser
* Nietzsche
* Novalis
* Paine
* Renan
* Rousseau
* Royce
* Sade
* Schiller
* Smith
* Spencer
* Stirner
* Taine
* Thoreau
* Tocqueville
* Vico
* Vivekananda
* Voltaire

20th–21st-century
philosophers|

* Adorno
* Ambedkar
* Arendt
* Aurobindo
* Aron
* Azurmendi
* Badiou
* Baudrillard
* Bauman
* Benoist
* Berlin
* Bernstein
* Butler
* Camus
* Chomsky
* De Beauvoir
* Debord
* Du Bois
* Durkheim
* Dworkin
* Foucault
* Gandhi
* Gauthier
* Gehlen
* Gentile
* Gramsci
* Habermas
* Hayek
* Heidegger
* Irigaray
* Kautsky
* Kirk
* Kropotkin
* Laclau
* Lenin
* Luxemburg
* Mao
* Mansfield
* Marcuse
* Maritain
* Michels
* Mises
* Mou
* Mouffe
* Negri
* Niebuhr
* Nozick
* Nursî
* Oakeshott
* Ortega
* Pareto
* Pettit
* Plamenatz
* Polanyi
* Popper
* Qutb
* Radhakrishnan
* Rand
* Rawls
* Rothbard
* Russell
* Santayana
* Sartre
* Scanlon
* Schmitt
* Searle
* Shariati
* Simmel
* Simonović
* Skinner
* Sombart
* Sorel
* Spann
* Spirito
* Strauss
* Sun
* Taylor
* Walzer
* Weber
* Žižek

Social theories|

* Anarchism
* Authoritarianism
* Collectivism
* Communism
* Communitarianism
* Conflict theories
* Confucianism
* Consensus theory
* Conservatism
* Contractualism
* Cosmopolitanism
* Culturalism
* Fascism
* Feminist political theory
* Gandhism
* Individualism
* Islam
* Islamism
* Legalism
* Liberalism
* Libertarianism
* Mohism
* National liberalism
* Republicanism
* Social constructionism
* Social constructivism
* Social Darwinism
* Social determinism
* Socialism
* Utilitarianism

Concepts|

* Civil disobedience
* Democracy
* Four occupations
* Justice
* Law
* Mandate of Heaven
* Peace
* Property
* Revolution
* Rights
* Social contract
* Society
* War
* more...

Related articles|

* Jurisprudence
* Philosophy and economics
* Philosophy of education
* Philosophy of history
* Philosophy of love
* Philosophy of sex
* Philosophy of social science
* Political ethics
* Social epistemology

* Category

* v
* t
* e

Jurisprudence

Legal theory|

* Critical legal studies
* Comparative law
* Economic analysis
* Legal norms
* International legal theory
* Legal history
* Philosophy of law
* Sociology of law

Philosophers|

* Alexy
* Allan
* Aquinas
* Aristotle
* Austin
* Beccaria
* Bentham
* Betti
* Bickel
* Blackstone
* Bobbio
* Bork
* Brożek
* Cardozo
* Castanheira Neves
* Chafee
* Coleman
* Del Vecchio
* Durkheim
* Dworkin
* Ehrlich
* Feinberg
* Fineman
* Finnis
* Frank
* Fuller
* Gardner
* George
* Green
* Grisez
* Grotius
* Gurvitch
* Habermas
* Han
* Hart
* Hegel
* Hobbes
* Hohfeld
* Hägerström
* Jellinek
* Jhering
* Kant
* Kelsen
* Köchler
* Kramer
* Llewellyn
* Lombardía
* Luhmann
* Lundstedt
* Lyons
* MacCormick
* Marx
* Nussbaum
* Olivecrona
* Pashukanis
* Perelman
* Petrażycki
* Pontes de Miranda
* Posner
* Pound
* Puchta
* Pufendorf
* Radbruch
* Rawls
* Raz
* Reale
* Reinach
* Renner
* Ross
* Rumi
* Savigny
* Scaevola
* Schauer
* Schmitt
* Shang
* Simmonds
* Somló
* Suárez
* Tribe
* Unger
* Voegelin
* Waldron
* Walzer
* Weber
* Wronkowska

Theories|

* Analytical jurisprudence
* Deontological ethics
* Fundamental theory of canon law
* Interpretivism
* Legalism
* Legal moralism
* Legal positivism
* Legal realism
* Libertarian theories of law
* Natural law
* Paternalism
* Utilitarianism
* Virtue jurisprudence

Concepts|

* Dharma
* Fa
* Judicial interpretation
* Justice
* Legal system
* Li
* Rational-legal authority
* Usul al-Fiqh

Related articles|

* Law
* Political philosophy
* more...

* Category
* Law portal
* Philosophy portal
* WikiProject Law
* WikiProject Philosophy
* changes

* v
* t
* e

Positivism

| Perspectives|

* Antihumanism
* Empiricism
* Rationalism
* Scientism

|

Declinations|

* Legal positivism
* Logical positivism / analytic philosophy
* Positivist school
* Postpositivism
* Sociological positivism
* Machian positivism (empirio-criticism)
* Rankean historical positivism
* Polish positivism
* Russian Machism

Principal concepts|

* Consilience
* Demarcation
* Evidence
* Induction
* Justificationism
* Pseudoscience
* Critique of metaphysics
* Unity of science
* Verificationism

Antitheses|

* Antipositivism
* Confirmation holism
* Critical theory
* Falsifiability
* Geisteswissenschaft
* Hermeneutics
* Historicism
* Historism
* Human science
* Humanities
* Problem of induction
* Reflectivism
* Methodological dualism / Praxeology

Related paradigm shifts
in the history of science|

* Non-Euclidean geometry (1830s)
* Uncertainty principle (1927)

Related topics|

* Behavioralism
* Post-behavioralism
* Critical rationalism
* Criticism of science
* Epistemology
* anarchism
* idealism
* nihilism
* pluralism
* realism
* Holism
* Instrumentalism
* Modernism
* Naturalism in literature
* Nomothetic–idiographic distinction
* Objectivity in science
* Operationalism
* Phenomenalism
* Philosophy of science
* Deductive-nomological model
* Ramsey sentence
* Sense-data theory
* Qualitative research
* Relationship between religion and science
* Sociology
* Social science
* Philosophy
* Structural functionalism
* Structuralism
* Structuration theory

Positivist-related debate

| Method|

* Methodenstreit (1890s)
* Werturteilsstreit (1909–1959)
* Positivismusstreit (1960s)
* Fourth Great Debate in international relations (1980s)
* Science wars (1990s)

|

Contributions|

* The Course in Positive Philosophy (1830)
* A General View of Positivism (1848)
* Critical History of Philosophy (1869)
* Idealism and Positivism (1879–1884)
* The Analysis of Sensations (1886)
* The Logic of Modern Physics (1927)
* Language, Truth, and Logic (1936)
* The Two Cultures (1959)
* The Universe in a Nutshell (2001)

Proponents|

* Richard Avenarius
* A. J. Ayer
* Alexander Bogdanov
* Auguste Comte
* Eugen Dühring
* Émile Durkheim
* Ernst Laas
* Ernst Mach
* Berlin Circle
* Vienna Circle

Criticism|

* Materialism and Empirio-criticism (1909)
* History and Class Consciousness (1923)
* The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934)
* The Poverty of Historicism (1936)
* World Hypotheses (1942)
* Two Dogmas of Empiricism (1951)
* Truth and Method (1960)
* The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962)
* Conjectures and Refutations (1963)
* One-Dimensional Man (1964)
* Knowledge and Human Interests (1968)
* The Poverty of Theory (1978)
* The Scientific Image (1980)
* The Rhetoric of Economics (1986)

Critics|

* Theodor W. Adorno
* Gaston Bachelard
* Mario Bunge
* Wilhelm Dilthey
* Paul Feyerabend
* Hans-Georg Gadamer
* Thomas Kuhn
* György Lukács
* Karl Popper
* Willard Van Orman Quine
* Max Weber

Concepts in contention|

* Knowledge
* Objectivity
* Phronesis
* Truth
* Verstehen

Category

* v
* t
* e

Continental philosophy

Philosophers|

* Theodor W. Adorno
* Giorgio Agamben
* Louis Althusser
* Hannah Arendt
* Raymond Aron
* Gaston Bachelard
* Alain Badiou
* Roland Barthes
* Georges Bataille
* Jean Baudrillard
* Zygmunt Bauman
* Walter Benjamin
* Simone de Beauvoir
* Henri Bergson
* Maurice Blanchot
* Pierre Bourdieu
* Martin Buber
* Judith Butler
* Albert Camus
* Ernst Cassirer
* Cornelius Castoriadis
* Emil Cioran
* Benedetto Croce
* Paul de Man
* Guy Debord
* Gilles Deleuze
* Jacques Derrida
* Wilhelm Dilthey
* Hubert Dreyfus
* Umberto Eco
* Terry Eagleton
* Friedrich Engels
* Frantz Fanon
* Johann Gottlieb Fichte
* Michel Foucault
* Hans-Georg Gadamer
* Giovanni Gentile
* Félix Guattari
* Antonio Gramsci
* Jürgen Habermas
* G. W. F. Hegel
* Martin Heidegger
* Edmund Husserl
* Roman Ingarden
* Luce Irigaray
* Fredric Jameson
* Karl Jaspers
* Walter Kaufmann
* Søren Kierkegaard
* Ludwig Klages
* Pierre Klossowski
* Alexandre Kojève
* Alexandre Koyré
* Leszek Kołakowski
* Julia Kristeva
* Jacques Lacan
* Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe
* François Laruelle
* Bruno Latour
* Henri Lefebvre
* Claude Lévi-Strauss
* Emmanuel Levinas
* Niklas Luhmann
* György Lukács
* Jean-François Lyotard
* Gabriel Marcel
* Herbert Marcuse
* Karl Marx
* Quentin Meillassoux
* Maurice Merleau-Ponty
* Jean-Luc Nancy
* Antonio Negri
* Friedrich Nietzsche
* José Ortega y Gasset
* Jacques Rancière
* Paul Ricœur
* Edward Said
* Jean-Paul Sartre
* F. W. J. Schelling
* Carl Schmitt
* Arthur Schopenhauer
* Michel Serres
* Gilbert Simondon
* Peter Sloterdijk
* Edith Stein
* Leo Strauss
* Raymond Williams
* Slavoj Žižek

Theories|

* Absurdism
* Critical theory
* Deconstruction
* Existentialism
* Frankfurt School
* German idealism
* Hegelianism
* Hermeneutics
* Marxism
* Neo-Kantianism
* New Philosophers
* Non-philosophy
* Phenomenology
* Postmodernism
* Post-structuralism
* Psychoanalytic theory
* Romanticism
* Social constructionism
* Speculative realism
* Structuralism
* Western Marxism

Concepts|

* Alterity
* Angst
* Apollonian and Dionysian
* Authenticity
* Being in itself
* Boredom
* Class struggle
* Dasein
* Death of God
* Death drive
* Différance
* Difference
* Existence precedes essence
* Existential crisis
* Facticity
* Genealogy
* Habitus
* Historical materialism
* Ideology
* Intersubjectivity
* Leap of faith
* Master–slave dialectic
* Master–slave morality
* Oedipus complex
* Ontic
* Other
* Power
* Ressentiment
* Self-deception
* Totalitarianism
* Trace
* Transvaluation of values
* Will to power

* Category
* Index

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max Weber. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biography:Max_Weber&oldid=3440291"
*[m.]: married
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template