Amphipoda

Amphipoda (/æmˈfɪpədə/) is an order of malacostracan crustaceans with no carapace and generally with laterally compressed bodies. Amphipods (/ˈæmfɪpɒdz/) range in size from 1 to 340 millimetres (0.039 to 13 in) and are mostly detritivores or scavengers. More than 10,700 amphipod species are currently recognized. They are mostly marine animals but are found in almost all aquatic environments. Some 2,250 species live in fresh water, and the order also includes the terrestrial sandhoppers, such as Talitrus saltator and Arcitalitrus sylvaticus.

## Contents

* 1 Description
* 1.1 Anatomy
* 1.2 Size
* 1.3 Reproduction and life cycle
* 2 Ecology
* 2.1 Foraging behaviour
* 3 Nomenclature
* 3.1 Taxonomy
* 3.2 Fossil record
* 4 See also
* 5 References
* 6 External links

## Description

### Anatomy

Anatomical diagram of the gammaridean amphipod Leucothoe incisa

Amphipods are characterized by sessile eyes (without eyestalks), no carapace, and the presence of gills on the coxae.[1] Their bodies are divided into 13 segments, which can be grouped into the head, thorax and abdomen.[2]

The head is fused to the thorax, and bears two pairs of antennae and one pair of compound eyes.[3] It also carries the mouthparts, but these are mostly concealed.[4] Amphipods are one of the few groups to possess gnathopods, which are uniquely modified feeding legs.[5]

The thorax and abdomen are usually quite distinct and bear different kinds of legs; they are typically laterally compressed.[3] The thorax bears eight pairs of uniramous appendages, the first of which are used as accessory mouthparts; the next four pairs are directed forwards, and the last three pairs are directed backwards.[3] Gills are present on the thoracic segments, and there is an open circulatory system with a heart, using haemocyanin to carry oxygen in the haemolymph to the tissues. The uptake and excretion of salts is controlled by special glands on the antennae.[2]

The abdomen is divided into two sections comprising three segments each:[1] the pleosome which bears swimming legs, and the urosome, which comprises a telson and three pairs of uropods which do not form a tail fan as they do in animals such as true shrimp.[3] Furthermore, amphipods are the only malacostracan crustaceans that possess more than one pair of uropods.[6] Both of these limb types are usually well-developed. Epimera are present on the abdomen.[1]

Some amphipods possess aberrant body plans, such as the elongate skeleton shrimp (Caprellidae) and Macrohectopus (Macrohectopidae).

### Size

Americorchestia sp.; Talitridae

Alicella gigantea; Alicellidae

Amphipods in hands

Amphipods are typically less than 10 millimetres (0.4 in) long, but the largest known amphipods are much larger; specimens of Alicella gigantea collected from 5,300 metres (17,400 ft) deep are 27–28 cm (10.6–11.0 in) long,[7] reconstructed gut contents from a black-footed albatross indicates 34 centimetres (13 in),[8] and photographed animals from the Kermadec Trench indicate lengths of up to 34.9 centimetres (13.7 in).[9] The smallest known amphipods are less than 1 millimetre (0.04 in) long.[10] The size of amphipods is limited by the availability of dissolved oxygen, such that the amphipods in Lake Titicaca at an altitude of 3,800 metres (12,500 ft) can only grow up to 22 millimetres (0.87 in), compared to lengths of 90 millimetres (3.5 in) in Lake Baikal at 455 metres (1,500 ft).[11]

Some amphipods exhibit sexual dimorphism. In dimorphic species, males are usually larger than females, although this is reversed in the genus Crangonyx.[12]

### Reproduction and life cycle

Amphipods engage in amplexus, a precopulatory guarding behavior in which males will grasp a female with their gnathopods and carry the female held against their ventral surface. Amplexus can last from two to over fifteen days, depending on water temperature, and ends when the female molts, at which point her eggs are ready for fertilisation.[12]

Mature females bear a marsupium, or brood pouch, which holds her eggs while they are fertilised,[2] and until the young are ready to hatch.[3] As a female ages, she produces more eggs in each brood. Mortality is around 25–50% for the eggs. There are no larval stages; the eggs hatch directly into a juvenile form, and sexual maturity is generally reached after six moults. Some species have been known to eat their own exuviae after moulting.[2]

## Ecology

Talitrus saltator is an abundant animal of sandy beaches around Europe. Dorsal (top) view of a newly[needs update] discovered amphipod living in a commensal relationship with a bamboo coral (Keratoisis flexibilis)

Amphipods are found in almost all aquatic environments, from fresh water to water with twice the salinity of sea water[2] and even in the Challenger Deep, the deepest known point in the ocean.[13] They are almost always an important component of aquatic ecosystems,[14] often acting as mesograzers;[15] a monograph calls them ″integral members of global marine ecosystems″.[16]

Most species in the suborder Gammaridea are epibenthic, although they are often collected in plankton samples. Members of the Hyperiidea are all planktonic and marine;[3] many are symbionts of gelatinous animals, including salps, medusae, siphonophores, colonial radiolarians and ctenophores, and most hyperiids are associated with gelatinous animals during some part of their life cycle.[17]

Some 1,900 species, or 20% of the total amphipod diversity, live in fresh water or other non-marine waters. Notably rich endemic amphipod faunas are found in the ancient Lake Baikal and waters of the Caspian Sea basin,[18] with over 350 species inhabiting Lake Baikal.[19]

The landhoppers of the family Talitridae (which also includes semi-terrestrial and marine animals) are terrestrial, living in damp environments such as leaf litter.[20] Landhoppers have a wide distribution in areas that were formerly part of Gondwana, but have colonised parts of Europe and North America in recent times.

Around 750 species in 160 genera and 30 families are troglobitic and live in caves, and are found in almost all suitable habitats, but with their centres of diversity in the Mediterranean Basin, southeastern North America and the Caribbean.[21]

Amphipods are a potential means of mitigating eutrophication in aquaculture facilities.[22]

Compared to other crustacean groups, such as the Isopoda, Rhizocephala or Copepoda, relatively few amphipods are parasitic on other animals. The most notable example of parasitic amphipods are the whale lice (family Cyamidae). Unlike other amphipods, these are dorso-ventrally flattened, and have large, strong claws, with which they attach themselves to baleen whales. They are the only parasitic crustaceans which cannot swim during any part of their life cycle.[23]

### Foraging behaviour

Most amphipods are detritivores or scavengers,[2] with some being grazers of algae, omnivores or predators[3] of small insects and crustaceans.[2] Food is grasped with the front two pairs of legs, which are armed with large claws.[2] More immobile species of amphipods eat higher quantities of less nutritious food rather than actively seeking more nutritious food.[24] This is a type of compensatory feeding.[24] This behaviour may have evolved to minimise predation risk when searching for other foods.[24] Ampithoe longimana, for example, is more sedentary than other species and have been observed to remain on host plants longer.[24] In fact, when presented with both high- and low-nutrition food options, the sedentary species Ampithoe longimana does not distinguish between the two options.[24] Other amphipod species, such as Gammarus mucronatus and Elasmopus levis, which have superior predator avoidance and are more mobile, are better able to pursue different food sources.[24] In species without the compensatory feeding ability, survivorship, fertility, and growth can be strongly negatively affected in the absence of high-quality food.[24] Compensatory feeding may also explain the year-round presence of A. longimana in certain waters.[25] Because algal presence changes throughout the year in certain communities, the evolution of flexible feeding techniques such as compensatory feeding may have been beneficial to survival.[25]

Ampithoe longimana has been observed to avoid certain compounds when foraging for food.[26] In response to this avoidance, species of seaweed such as Dictyopteris membranacea or Dictyopteris hoytii have evolved to produce C11 sulfur compounds and C-9 oxo-acids in their bodies as defence mechanisms that specifically deter amphipods instead of deterrence to consumption by other predators.[26]

In populations found in benthic ecosystems, amphipods play an essential role in controlling brown algae growth.[15] The mesograzer behaviour of amphipods greatly contributes to the suppression of brown algal dominance in the absence of amphipod predators.[15] Amphipods display a strong preference for brown algae in benthic ecosystems, but due to removal of mesograzers by predators such as fish, brown algae is able to dominate these communities over green and red algae species.[15]

The incidence of cannibalism and intraguild predation is relatively high in some species,[27] although adults may decrease cannibalistic behaviour directed at juveniles when they are likely to encounter their own offspring.[28] In addition to age, sex may affect cannibalistic behaviour as males cannibalised newly moulted females less than males.[27]

They have, rarely, been identified as feeding on humans; in Melbourne in 2017 a boy who stood in the sea for about half an hour had severe bleeding from wounds on his legs that did not coagulate easily. This was found to have been caused by "sea fleas" identified as lysianassid amphipods, possibly in a feeding group. Their bites are not venomous and do not cause lasting damage.[29]

## Nomenclature

The name Amphipoda comes, via Neo-Latin amphipoda, from the Greek roots ἀμφί 'on both/all sides' and πούς 'foot'. This contrasts with the related Isopoda, which have a single kind of thoracic leg.[30] Particularly among anglers, amphipods are known as freshwater shrimp, scuds, or sideswimmers.[2][31] The common names relate to their swimming habits, described as "scudding" and often having the animal tilt to one side.[32]

### Taxonomy

Over 10,700 species of amphipods are currently recognised. The higher taxonomy of Amphipoda has been thoroughly rearranged in the 21st century, and currently comprises six suborders:[6]

* Amphilochidea (89 families; 700 genera; 4,308 species)
* Colomastigidea (2 families; 3 genera; 60 species)
* Hyperiidea (35 families; 76 genera; 284 species)
* Hyperiopsidea (3 families; 5 genera; 15 species)
* Pseudingolfiellidea (1 families; 1 genera; 4 species)
* Senticaudata (109 families; 983 genera; 6,007 species)

* Lepidepecreum longicorne (Amphilochidea: Lysianassidae)

* Hyperia galba (Hyperiidea: Hyperiidae)

* Pariambus typicus (Senticaudata: Caprellidae)

A previous classification comprised the four suborders Gammaridea, Caprellidea, Hyperiidea, and Ingolfiellidea,[33] of which Gammaridea contained the majority of taxa, including all the freshwater and terrestrial species.[4] Gammaridea was recognised as a phylogenetically problematic group, and a new classification was developed by James K. Lowry and Alan Myers in a series of works over 2003–2017, using cladistic analysis of morphological characters.[34][35][1] It started with breaking up and replacing Gammaridea. The largest of the new suborders, Senticaudata, comprises over half of the known amphipod species, including practically all freshwater taxa.[6] At the same time, Ingolfiellidea was split from Amphipoda and reclassified as order Ingolfiellida.[1] The more recent work of Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. (2020) using analysis of molecular data found general support for three major groups corresponding to suborders Amphilochidea, Hyperiidea and Senticaudata, but suggests some groups need to move between Amphilochidea and Senticaudata in a taxonomic revision.[36]

New Amphipoda classification of Lowry and Myers[35][1]

______________Suborder________Infraorder_______Parvorder_______Superfamily____  | Amphipoda |  |  |  | Pseudingolfiellidea  |  | Pseudingolfiellida  |  |  |

Pseudingolfielloidea

|

|  |  |  | Hyperiidea |  | Physosomata  |  |  |  |  |

Lanceoloidea

|

Scinoidea

Physocephalata  |  |  |  |  |

Vibilioidea

|

|  |  |

Phronimoidea

|

Platysceloidea

|  |  |  | Colomastigidea  |  | Colomastigida  |  |  |  |  |

Colomastigoidea

|

Pagetinoidea

Hyperiopsidea  |  | Hyperiopsida  |  |  |  |  |

Podosiroidea

|

Hyperiopsoidea

|  | Senticaudata |  |  |  | Carangoliopsida  |  |  |  |  |

Carangoliopsoidea

|

|  |  |  | Talitrida |  |  |  |  |

Biancolinoidea

|

Caspicoloidea

Kurioidea

Talitroidea

|  |  |  | Hadziida  |  |  |  |  |

Calliopioidea

|

Hadzioidea

Corophiida |  | Corophiidira |  |  |

Aoroidea

|

Cheluroidea

Chevalioidea

Corophioidea

Caprellidira |  |  |

Aetiopedesoidea

|

Isaeoidea

Microprotopoidea

Neomegamphoidea

Photoidea

Rakirooidea

Caprelloidea

|  | Bogidiellida  |  |  |  |  |

Bogidielloidea

|

Gammarida  |  | Gammaridira  |  |  |

Gammaroidea

|

Crangonyctidira  |  |  |

Allocrangonyctoidea

|

Crangonyctoidea

Amphilochidea  |  | Amphilochida  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

Maxillipioidea

|

|  |  |  |  |  |  |

Oedicerotoidea

|

|  | Eusiridira  |  |  |

Liljeborgioidea

|

Eusiroidea

Amphilochidira  |  |  |

Amphilochoidea

|

|  |  |

Leucothoidea

|

Iphimedioidea

Lysianassida  |  |  |  |  |

Dexaminoidea

|

|  |  |  |  |

Synopioidea

|

|  |  |  |  |

Haustorioidea

|

Lysianassidira  |  |  |

Alicelloidea

|

|  |  |

Stegocephaloidea

|

|  |  |

Lysianassoidea

|

Aristioidea

Script error: No such module "Clade/labels".

### Fossil record

Amphipods are thought to have originated in the Lower Carboniferous. Despite the group's age, however, the fossil record of the order Amphipoda is meagre, comprising specimens of one species from the Lower Cretaceous (Hauterivian) Weald Clay (United Kingdom)[37] and 12 species dating back only as far as the Upper Eocene, where they have been found in Baltic amber.[38][39]

## See also

## References

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lowry, J.K.; Myers, A.A. (2017). "A Phylogeny and Classification of the Amphipoda with the Establishment of the New Order Ingolfiellida (Crustacea: Peracarida)". Zootaxa (Magnolia Press) 4265 (1): 001–089. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4265.1.1. PMID 28610392. http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/article/view/zootaxa.4265.1.1/11015.
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Wade, Sam; Corbin, Tracy; McDowell, Linda-Marie (2004). "Class Crustacea". Critter Catalogue. A guide to the aquatic invertebrates of South Australian inland waters. Waterwatch South Australia. ISBN 1-876562-67-6. http://www.sa.waterwatch.org.au/pdfs/critters_5_crustaceans.pdf.
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 "Order Amphipoda". Guide to the marine zooplankton of south eastern Australia. Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute. 2008. http://www.tafi.org.au/zooplankton/imagekey/malacostraca/peracarida/amphipoda/amphipoda.html.
4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Holsinger, John R.. "What Are Amphipods?". Old Dominion University. http://sci.odu.edu/biology/directory/Holsinger/jrh/whatis.htm.
5. ↑ "Definitions Gnathopods". Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. https://research.nhm.org/glossary/define.html?term=Gnathopods.
6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 World Amphipoda Database. "Introduction". https://www.marinespecies.org/amphipoda/index.php.
7. ↑ Barnard, J. Laurens; Bowers, Darl E.; Haderlie, Eugene C. (1980). "Amphipoda: The Amphipods and Allies". in Morris, Robert H.; Morris, Robert Hugh; Abbott, Donald Putnam et al.. Intertidal Invertebrates of California. Stanford University Press. pp. 559–566. ISBN 0-8047-1045-7.
8. ↑ Barnard, J. Laurens; Ingram, Camilla L. (1986). "The supergiant amphipod Alicella gigantea Chevreux from the North Pacific Gyre". Journal of Crustacean Biology 6 (4): 825–839. Bibcode: 1986JCBio...6..825B.
9. ↑ Jamieson, A. J.; Lacey, N. C.; Lörz, A. -N.; Rowden, A. A.; Piertney, S. B. (2013-08-01). "The supergiant amphipod Alicella gigantea (Crustacea: Alicellidae) from hadal depths in the Kermadec Trench, SW Pacific Ocean" (in en). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. Deep-Sea Biodiversity and Life History Processes 92: 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.12.002. ISSN 0967-0645. Bibcode: 2013DSRII..92..107J. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967064512001932.
10. ↑ Wolff, T. (1969). "The fauna of Rennell and Bellona, Solomon Islands". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 255 (800): 321–343. doi:10.1098/rstb.1969.0014. Bibcode: 1969RSPTB.255..321W.
11. ↑ Peck, L. S.; Chapelle, G. (2003). "Reduced oxygen at high altitude limits maximum size". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270 (Suppl 2): S166–S167. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0054. PMID 14667371.
12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Glazier, Doug (2009). "Amphipoda". in Likens, Gene. Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Academic Press. pp. 89–115. doi:10.1016/B978-012370626-3.00154-X. ISBN 978-0-12-088462-9.
13. ↑ National Geographic (27 March 2012). "James Cameron on Earth's Deepest Spot: Desolate, Lunar-Like". National Geographic Society. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/03/120326-james-cameron-mariana-trench-challenger-deepest-lunar-sub-science/.
14. ↑ Lowry, J. K.; Springthorpe, R. T.. "Introduction". Amphipoda: Families. Australian Museum. http://www.crustacea.net/crustace/amphipoda/index.htm.
15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Duffy, J. E.; Hay, Mark E. (2000). "Strong impacts of grazing amphipods on the organization of a benthic community". Ecological Monographs 70 (2): 237–263. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0237:SIOGAO2.0.CO;2].
16. ↑ Ritter, Carmen J.; Bourne, David G. (March 2024). "Marine amphipods as integral members of global ocean ecosystems". Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 572. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2023.151985. Bibcode: 2024JEMBE.57251985R. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002209812300117X/pdfft?md5=db06176f1777adbfe62c48d840b9ae6f&pid=1-s2.0-S002209812300117X-main.pdf. Retrieved 23 July 2025.
17. ↑ Harbison, G. R.; Biggs, D. C.; Madin, L. P. (1977). "The associations of Amphipoda Hyperiidea with gelatinous zooplankton. II. Associations with Cnidaria, Cteuophora and Radiolaria". Deep-Sea Research 24 (5): 465–488. doi:10.1016/0146-6291(77)90484-2. Bibcode: 1977DSR....24..465H.
18. ↑ Väinölä, R.; Witt, J. D. S.; Grabowski, M.; Bradbury, J. H.; Jazdzewski, K.; Sket, B. (2008). "Global diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda, Crustacea) in freshwater". Hydrobiologia 595 (1): 241–255. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9020-6. Bibcode: 2008HyBio.595..241V. http://decapoda.nhm.org/pdfs/27701/27701.pdf.
19. ↑ Thorp and Covich's Freshwater Invertebrates (4 ed.). Academic Press - Elsevier. 2019. ISBN 978-0-12-385024-9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123850249/thorp-and-covichs-freshwater-invertebrates. Retrieved 23 July 2025.
20. ↑ Minor, M. A.; Robertson, A. W. (March 5, 2010). "Amphipoda". Guide to New Zealand Soil Invertebrates. Massey University. http://soilbugs.massey.ac.nz/amphipoda.php.
21. ↑ Hobbs, Horton H. III (2003). "Crustacea". in Gunn, John. Encyclopedia of Caves and Karst Science. Routledge. pp. 254–257. ISBN 978-1-57958-399-6. http://www.routledge-ny.com/ref/caves/crustacea.pdf.
22. ↑ Guerra-García, José Manuel; Martínez-Pita, Inés; Šegvić-Bubić, Tanja; Manchado, Manuel; Arechavala-Lopez, Pablo; Calado, Ricardo; Marchio, Elizabeth; Gentry, Rebecca et al. (2023). "5 - Aquaculture and conservation". New Perspectives and Sustainable Development of Biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Academic Press. pp. 111–146. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-85613-3.00003-7. ISBN 978-0-323-85613-3.
23. ↑ Goater, Tim (May 4, 1996). "Parasitic Amphipoda". Interactive Parasitology. Vancouver Island University. http://web.viu.ca/goatert/PARASITE/PARAMPH.HTM.
24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 24.6 Cruz-Rivera, Edwin; Hay, Mark E. (2000). "Can quantity replace quality? Food choice, compensatory feeding, and fitness of marine mesograzers". Ecology 81: 201–219. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0201:CQRQFC2.0.CO;2].
25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Cruz-Rivera, Edwin; Hay, Mark E. (2001). "Macroalgal traits and the feeding and fitness of an herbivorous amphipod: the roles of selectivity, mixing, and compensation". Marine Ecology Progress Series 218: 249–266. doi:10.3354/meps218249. Bibcode: 2001MEPS..218..249C. https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v218/p249-266/.
26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 Schnitzler, Iris; Pohnert, Georg; Hay, Mark; Boland, Wilhelm (2001). "Chemical defense of brown algae (Dictyopteris spp.) against the herbivorous amphipod Ampithoe longimana". Oecologia 126 (4): 515–521. doi:10.1007/s004420000546. PMID 28547236. Bibcode: 2001Oecol.126..515S.
27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Dick, Jaimie T. A. (1995). "The cannibalistic behaviour of two Gammarus species (Crustacea: Amphipoda)". Journal of Zoology 236 (4): 697–706. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02740.x.
28. ↑ Lewis, Susan E.; Dick, Jaimie T. A.; Lagerstrom, Erin K.; Clarke, Hazel C. (2010). "Avoidance of filial cannibalism in the amphipod Gammarus pulex". Ethology 116 (2): 138–146. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01726.x. Bibcode: 2010Ethol.116..138L.
29. ↑ Zhou, Naaman (2017-08-08). "Australian teen just 'unfortunate' to be attacked by meat-loving sea fleas" (in en-GB). The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/08/australian-teen-just-unfortunate-to-be-attacked-by-meat-loving-sea-fleas.
30. ↑ Amphipoda (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press, September 2005, http://oed.com/search?searchType=dictionary&q=Amphipoda (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
31. ↑ Chan, Brian. "Freshwater shrimp (scuds, sideswimmers) – Class: Crustacea, Order: Amphipoda". Fly Fishers' Republic. http://www.flyfishersrepublic.com/entomology/freshwater-shrimp/.
32. ↑ Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Academic Press - Elsevier. 2009. ISBN 978-0-12-370626-3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/referencework/9780123706263/encyclopedia-of-inland-waters. Retrieved 23 July 2025.
33. ↑ Martin, Joel W.; Davis, George E. (2001). An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. p. 132. http://atiniui.nhm.org/pdfs/3839/3839.pdf. Retrieved 2010-04-08.
34. ↑ Myers, A. A.; Lowry, J. K. (2003). "A Phylogeny and a New Classification of the Corophiidea Leach, 1814 (Amphipoda)". Journal of Crustacean Biology 23 (2): 443–485. doi:10.1651/0278-0372(2003)023[0443:APAANC2.0.CO;2]. ISSN 0278-0372.
35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 Lowry, J. K.; Myers, A. A. (2013). "A Phylogeny and a Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda)". Zootaxa 3610 (1): 1–80. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1. PMID 24699701. http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2013/f/zt03610p080.pdf.
36. ↑ Copilaş-Ciocianu, Denis; Borko, Špela; Fišer, Cene (2020). "The Late Blooming Amphipods: Global Change Promoted Post-Jurassic Ecological Radiation Despite Palaeozoic Origin" (in en). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 143. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106664. PMID 31669816. Bibcode: 2020MolPE.14306664C.
37. ↑ Edmund A. Jarzembowski; Cédric Chény; Yan Fang; Bo Wang (2020). "First Mesozoic amphipod crustacean from the Lower Cretaceous of SE England". Cretaceous Research 112. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104429. Bibcode: 2020CrRes.11204429J. https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02495739/document.
38. ↑ Bousfield, E. L.; Poinar, G. O. Jr. (1994). "A new terrestrial amphipod from tertiary amber deposits of Chiapas province, Southern Mexico". Historical Biology 7 (2): 105–114. doi:10.1080/10292389409380448. Bibcode: 1994HBio....7..105B.
39. ↑ The species Rosagammarus minichiellus from the considerably older Late Triassic Luning Formation of Nevada was originally described as an amphipod, but subsequently reinterpreted as the right half of a decapod tail (Starr, Hegna & McMenamin 2015, The Geological Society of America North-Central Section 49th Annual Meeting [1])

## External links

* Data related to Amphipoda at Wikispecies

Template:Malacostraca Wikidata ☰ Q193418 entry

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphipoda. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Amphipoda&oldid=4320228"