ALA-LC romanization

Short description: American set of romanization standards

ALA-LC (American Library Association - Library of Congress) is a set of standards for romanization, the representation of text in other writing systems using the Latin script.

## Contents

* 1 Applications
* 2 Scripts
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 External links

## Applications

The system is used to represent bibliographic information by North American libraries and the British Library (for acquisitions since 1975)[1] and in publications throughout the English-speaking world.

The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules require catalogers to romanize access points from their non-Roman originals.[2] However, as the MARC standards have been expanded to allow records containing Unicode characters,[3][4] many cataloguers now include bibliographic data in both Roman and original scripts. The emerging Resource Description and Access continues many of AACR's recommendations but refers to the process as "transliteration" rather than "Romanization."[5]

## Scripts

The ALA-LC Romanization includes over 70 romanization tables.[6] Here are some examples of tables:

* A Cherokee Romanization table was created by the LC and ALA in 2012 and subsequently approved by the Cherokee Tri-Council meeting in Cherokee, North Carolina. It was the first ALA-LC Romanization table for a Native American syllabary.[7]
* The Chinese Romanization table used the Wade–Giles transliteration system until 1997, when the Library of Congress (LC) announced a decision to switch to the Pinyin system.[8]
* ALA-LC romanization for Korean
* ALA-LC romanization for Russian

## See also

* Devanagari transliteration
* Romanization of Arabic
* Romanization of Armenian
* Romanization of Belarusian
* Romanization of Bulgarian
* Romanization of Khmer
* Romanization of Georgian
* Romanization of Persian
* Romanization of Ukrainian
* Romanization of Urdu

## References

1. ↑ "Searching for Cyrillic items in the catalogues of the British Library: guidelines and transliteration tables "
2. ↑ Agenbroad, James E. (5 June 2006). "Romanization Is Not Enough". Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 42 (2): 21–34. doi:10.1300/J104v42n02_03.
3. ↑ McCallum, S.H. (2002). "MARC: keystone for library automation". IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 24 (2): 34–49. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2002.1010068.
4. ↑ Aliprand, Joan M. (22 January 2013). "The Structure and Content of MARC 21 Records in the Unicode Environment". Information Technology and Libraries 24 (4): 170. doi:10.6017/ital.v24i4.3381.
5. ↑ Seikel, Michele (9 October 2009). "No More Romanizing: The Attempt to Be Less Anglocentric in RDA". Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 47 (8): 741–748. doi:10.1080/01639370903203192.
6. ↑ "ALA-LC Romanization Tables". Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/roman.html.
7. ↑ "Cherokee Romanization Table". Library of Congress. 2012. https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/roman_cherokee.html.
8. ↑ Council on East Asian Libraries (CEAL) Pinyin Liaison Group (March 2000). "Final Report on Pinyin Conversion". Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal 9. ISSN 1089-4667. http://www.white-clouds.com/iclc/cliej/cl9ceal.htm. Retrieved 2 June 2014.

## External links

* ALA-LC Romanization Tables

* v
* t
* e

Romanization

By publisher (for several languages)|

* ALA–LC
* BGN/PCGN
* GOST
* ISO
* Yale

By language or writing system|

* Amharic
* Arabic
* Armenian
* Bengali
* Berber
* Burmese
* Chinese
* in Taiwan
* in Singapore
* Cyrillic
* informal
* Belarusian
* Bulgarian
* Kyrgyz
* Macedonian
* Russian
* Serbian
* Ukrainian
* Georgian
* Greek
* Hebrew
* Inuktitut
* Japanese
* Khmer
* Korean
* Lao
* Malayalam
* Maldivian
* Persian
* Syriac
* Tibetan
* Telugu
* Thai
* Urdu
* Uyghur
* Vietnamese

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALA-LC romanization. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=ALA-LC_romanization&oldid=3985754"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template