Isotopes of darmstadtium

Template:Infobox darmstadtium isotopes Darmstadtium (110Ds) is a synthetic element, and thus a standard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all synthetic elements, it has no stable isotopes. The first isotope to be synthesized was 269Ds in 1994. There are 11 known radioisotopes from 267Ds to 281Ds (with many gaps) and 2 or 3 known isomers. The longest-lived isotope is 281Ds with a half-life of 14 seconds. However, the unconfirmed 282Ds might have an even longer half-life of 67 seconds.[1]

## Contents

* 1 List of isotopes
* 2 Isotopes and nuclear properties
* 2.1 Nucleosynthesis
* 2.1.1 Cold fusion
* 2.1.2 Hot fusion
* 2.1.3 As decay product
* 2.1.4 Retracted isotopes
* 2.1.5 Nuclear isomerism
* 2.2 Chemical yields of isotopes
* 2.2.1 Cold fusion
* 2.3 Fission of compound nuclei with Z = 110
* 2.4 Theoretical calculations
* 2.4.1 Decay characteristics
* 2.4.2 Evaporation residue cross sections
* 3 References

## List of isotopes

Nuclide
[n 1] | Z | N | Isotopic mass (u)
[n 2][n 3] | Half-life
| Decay
mode
[n 4] | Daughter
isotope
| Spin and
parity
[n 5][n 6]

|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Excitation energy
267Ds[n 7] | 110  | 157  | 267.14373(22)#  | 1995 | 2.8+13.0
−1.3 μs
[10(8) μs]  | α | 263Hs  | 3/2+#
269Ds  | 110  | 159  | 269.14475(3)  | 1995 | 170+160
−60 μs
[230(110) μs]  | α  | 265Hs  |
270Ds  | 110  | 160  | 270.14459(4)  | 2001 | 205(48) μs | α  | 266Hs  | 0+
270mDs  | 1390(60) keV  | 2001 | 3.9+1.5
−0.8 ms
[4.3(12) ms]  | α (70%)  | 266Hs  | 10−#
IT (30%)  | 270Ds
271Ds[n 8] | 110  | 161  | 271.14595(10)#  | 1995 | 144(53) ms  | SF (75%)  | (various)  |
α (25%)  | 267Hs
271mDs[n 8] | 68(27) keV  | 1998 | 1.63+0.44
−0.29 ms
[1.7(4) ms]  | α  | 267Hs  |
272Ds  | 110  | 162  | 272.146091(456)#  | (1989) | 200# ms  | SF?  | (various)
α?  | 268Hs
273Ds  | 110  | 163  | 273.14846(15)#  | 1996 | 190+140
−60 μs
[240(100) μs]  | α  | 269Hs  |
273mDs[n 7] | 198(20) keV  | 2024 | 120 ms  | α  | 269Hs  |
275Ds[2] | 110  | 165  | 275.15209(37)#  | 2024 | 430+290
−120 μs | α  | 271Hs  | 3/2#
276Ds[3] | 110  | 166  | 276.15302(59)#  | 2023 | 150+100
−40 μs | SF (57%)  | (various)  | 0+
α (43%)  | 272Hs
277Ds[n 9] | 110  | 167  | 277.15576(42)#  | 2010 | 4.0+1.8
−1.0 ms[4] | α  | 273Hs  |
279Ds[n 10] | 110  | 169  | 279.15998(65)#  | 2004 | 186+21
−17 ms[5] | SF (87%)[5] | (various)  |
α (13%)  | 275Hs
280Ds[n 11] | 110  | 170  | 280.16138(80)#  | 2021 | 360+172
−16 μs[6][7][8] | SF  | (various)  | 0+
281Ds[n 12][n 8] | 110  | 171  | 281.16455(53)#  | 2004 | 14(3) s | SF (90%)  | (various)  |
α (10%)  | 277Hs
281mDs[n 13][n 8] | 80(240)# keV  | 2012 | 0.25+1.18
−0.11 s
[0.9(7) s]  | α  | 277Hs  |
282Ds[n 14] | 110  | 172  | 282.16617(32)#  | (2016) | 67+320
−30 s
[4.2(33) min]  | α  | 278Hs  | 0+

1. ↑ mDs - Excited nuclear isomer.
2. ↑ ( ) - Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
3. ↑ # - Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).
4. ↑ Modes of decay:  SF: | Spontaneous fission

|

5. ↑ ( ) spin value - Indicates spin with weak assignment arguments.
6. ↑ # - Values marked # are not purely derived from experimental data, but at least partly from trends of neighboring nuclides (TNN).
7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Unconfirmed isotope
8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Order of ground state and isomer is uncertain.
9. ↑ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 285Fl
10. ↑ Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of 283Cn
11. ↑ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 288Fl
12. ↑ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 289Fl
13. ↑ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 293Lv, unconfirmed
14. ↑ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 290Fl, unconfirmed

## Isotopes and nuclear properties

### Nucleosynthesis

Superheavy elements such as darmstadtium are produced by bombarding lighter elements in particle accelerators that induce fusion reactions. Whereas most of the isotopes of darmstadtium can be synthesized directly this way, some heavier ones have only been observed as decay products of elements with higher atomic numbers.[9]

Depending on the energies involved, the former are separated into "hot" and "cold". In hot fusion reactions, very light, high-energy projectiles are accelerated toward very heavy targets (actinides), giving rise to compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV) that may either fission or evaporate several (3 to 5) neutrons.[10] In cold fusion reactions, the produced fused nuclei have a relatively low excitation energy (~10–20 MeV), which decreases the probability that these products will undergo fission reactions. As the fused nuclei cool to the ground state, they require emission of only one or two neutrons, and thus, allows for the generation of more neutron-rich products.[9] The latter is a distinct concept from that of where nuclear fusion claimed to be achieved at room temperature conditions (see cold fusion).[11]

The table below contains various combinations of targets and projectiles which could be used to form compound nuclei with Z = 110\.

Target | Projectile | CN | Attempt result

|
|
|

208Pb  | 62Ni | 270Ds | Successful reaction
207Pb  | 64Ni | 271Ds | Successful reaction
208Pb  | 64Ni | 272Ds | Successful reaction
209Bi  | 59Co | 268Ds | Successful reaction
226Ra  | 50Ti | 276Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted
232Th  | 44Ca | 276Ds | Failure to date
232Th  | 48Ca | 280Ds | Successful reaction
233U  | 40Ar | 273Ds | Failure to date[12]
235U  | 40Ar | 275Ds | Failure to date[12]
238U  | 40Ar | 278Ds | Successful reaction
244Pu  | 34S | 278Ds | Successful reaction
244Pu  | 36S | 280Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted
248Cm  | 30Si | 278Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted
250Cm  | 30Si | 280Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted

#### Cold fusion

Before the first successful synthesis of darmstadtium in 1994 by the GSI team, scientists at GSI also tried to synthesize darmstadtium by bombarding lead-208 with nickel-64 in 1985. No darmstadtium atoms were identified. After an upgrade of their facilities, the team at GSI successfully detected 9 atoms of 271Ds in two runs of their discovery experiment in 1994.[13] This reaction was successfully repeated in 2000 by GSI (4 atoms), in 2000[14][15] and 2004[16] by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) (9 atoms in total) and in 2002 by RIKEN (14 atoms).[17] The GSI team studied the analogous reaction with nickel-62 instead of nickel-64 in 1994 as part of their discovery experiment. Three atoms of 269Ds were detected.[13] A fourth decay chain was measured but was subsequently retracted.[18]

In addition to the official discovery reactions, in October–November 2000, the team at GSI also studied the analogous reaction using a lead-207 target in order to synthesize the new isotope 270Ds. They succeeded in synthesising eight atoms of 270Ds, relating to a ground state isomer, 270Ds, and a high-spin metastable state, 270mDs.[19]

In 1986, a team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, studied the reaction:

20983Bi + 5927Co → 267110Ds + 10n

They were unable to detect any darmstadtium atoms. In 1995, the team at LBNL reported that they had succeeded in detecting a single atom of 267Ds using this reaction. However, several decays were not measured and further research is required to confirm this discovery.[20]

#### Hot fusion

In the late 1980s, the GSI team attempted to synthesize element 110 by bombarding a target consisting of various uranium isotopes—233U, 235U, and 238U—with accelerated argon-40 ions. No atoms were detected;[21] a limiting cross section of 21 pb was reported.[12]

In September 1994, the team at Dubna detected a single atom of 273Ds by bombarding a plutonium-244 target with accelerated sulfur-34 ions.[22]

Experiments were done in 2004 at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR) in Dubna studying the fission characteristics of the compound nucleus 280Ds, produced in the reaction:

23290Th + 4820Ca → 280110Ds* → fission

The result revealed how compound nuclei such as this fission predominantly by expelling magic and doubly magic nuclei such as 132Sn (Z = 50, N = 82). No darmstadtium atoms were obtained.[23] A compound nucleus is a loose combination of nucleons that have not arranged themselves into nuclear shells yet. It has no internal structure and is held together only by the collision forces between the target and projectile nuclei. It is estimated that it requires around 10−14 s for the nucleons to arrange themselves into nuclear shells, at which point the compound nucleus becomes a nuclide, and this number is used by IUPAC as the minimum half-life a claimed isotope must have in order to be recognized as being discovered.[24][25]

The 232Th+48Ca reaction was attempted again at the FLNR in 2022; it was predicted that the 48Ca-induced reaction leading to element 110 would have a lower yield than those leading to lighter or heavier elements. Seven atoms of 276Ds were reported, with lifetimes ranging between 9.3 μs and 983.1 μs; four decayed by spontaneous fission and three decayed via a two-alpha sequence to 272Hs and the spontaneously fissioning 268Sg.[3] The maximum reported cross section for the production of 276Ds was about 0.7 pb and a sensitivity limit an order of magnitude lower was reached. This reported cross section is lower than that of all reactions using 48Ca as a projectile, with the exception of 249Cf + 48Ca, and it further supports the existence of magic numbers at Z = 108, N = 162 and Z = 114, N = 184.[3] In 2023, the JINR team repeated this reaction at a higher beam energy and also found 275Ds.[26] They intend to further study the reaction to search for 274Ds.[26] The FLNR also successfully synthesised 273Ds in the 238U+40Ar reaction.[2]

#### As decay product

List of darmstadtium isotopes observed by decay  Evaporation residue | Observed darmstadtium isotope

|

277Cn | 273Ds[27]
285Fl, 281Cn | 277Ds[28]
291Lv, 287Fl, 283Cn | 279Ds[29]
288Fl, 284Cn | 280Ds
288Mc, 284Nh, 280Rg ? | 280Ds ?
293Lv, 289Fl, 285Cn | 281Ds[30]
290Fl, 286Cn ? | 282Ds ?[1]

Darmstadtium has been observed as a decay product of copernicium. Copernicium currently has seven known isotopes, five of which have been shown to alpha decay into darmstadtium, with mass numbers 273, 277, and 279–281. To date, all of these bar 273Ds have only been produced by decay of copernicium. Parent copernicium nuclei can be themselves decay products of flerovium or livermorium. Darmstadtium may also have been produced in the electron capture decay of roentgenium nuclei which are themselves daughters of nihonium and moscovium.[25] For example, in 2004, the Dubna team (JINR) identified darmstadtium-281 as a product in the decay of livermorium via an alpha decay sequence:[30]

293116Lv → 289114Fl \+ 42He
289114Fl → 285112Cn \+ 42He
285112Cn → 281110Ds \+ 42He

#### Retracted isotopes

280Ds

The first synthesis of element 114 resulted in two atoms assigned to 288Fl, decaying to the 280Ds, which underwent spontaneous fission. The assignment was later changed to 289Fl and the darmstadtium isotope to 281Ds. Hence, 280Ds remained unknown until 2016, when it was populated by the hitherto unknown alpha decay of 284Cn (previously, that nucleus was only known to undergo spontaneous fission). The discovery of 280Ds in this decay chain was confirmed in 2021; it undergoes spontaneous fission with a half-life of 360 μs.[6]

277Ds

In the claimed synthesis of 293Og in 1999, the isotope 277Ds was identified as decaying by 10.18 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of 3.0 ms. This claim was retracted in 2001. This isotope was finally created in 2010 and its decay data supported the fabrication of previous data.[31]

273mDs

272Ds

In the first attempt to synthesize darmstadtium, a 10 ms SF activity was assigned to 272Ds in the reaction 232Th(44Ca,4n).[12] Given current understanding regarding stability, this isotope has been retracted from the table of isotopes.

#### Nuclear isomerism

The current partial decay level scheme for 270Ds proposed following the work of Hofmann et al. in 2000 at GSI[19]

281Ds

The production of 281Ds by the decay of 289Fl or 293Lv has produced two very different decay modes. The most common and readily confirmed mode is spontaneous fission with a half-life of 11 s. A much rarer and as yet unconfirmed mode is alpha decay by emission of an alpha particle with energy 8.77 MeV with an observed half-life of around 3.7 min. This decay is associated with a unique decay pathway from the parent nuclides and must be assigned to an isomeric level. The half-life suggests that it must be assigned to an isomeric state but further research is required to confirm these reports.[30] It was suggested in 2016 that this unknown activity might be due to 282Mt, the great-granddaughter of 290Fl via electron capture and two consecutive alpha decays.[1]

271Ds

Decay data from the direct synthesis of 271Ds clearly indicates the presence of two nuclear isomers. The first emits alpha particles with energies 10.74 and 10.69 MeV and has a half-life of 1.63 ms. The other only emits alpha particles with an energy of 10.71 MeV and has a half-life of 69 ms. The first has been assigned to the ground state and the latter to an isomeric level. It has been suggested that the closeness of the alpha decay energies indicates that the isomeric level may decay primarily by delayed isomeric transition to the ground state, resulting in an identical measured alpha energy and a combined half-life for the two processes.[32]

270Ds

The direct production of 270Ds has clearly identified two nuclear isomers. The ground state decays by alpha emission into the ground state of 266Hs by emitting an alpha particle with energy 11.03 MeV and has a half-life of 0.10 ms. The metastable state decays by alpha emission, emitting alpha particles with energies of 12.15, 11.15, and 10.95 MeV, and has a half-life of 6 ms. When the metastable state emits an alpha particle of energy 12.15 MeV, it decays into the ground state of 266Hs, indicating that it has 1.12 MeV of excess energy.[19]

### Chemical yields of isotopes

#### Cold fusion

The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for cold fusion reactions producing darmstadtium isotopes directly. Data in bold represent maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.

Projectile | Target | CN | 1n | 2n | 3n

|
|
|
|
|

62Ni | 208Pb | 270Ds | 3.5 pb |  |
64Ni | 208Pb | 272Ds | 15 pb, 9.9 MeV |  |

### Fission of compound nuclei with Z = 110

Experiments have been performed in 2004 at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Dubna studying the fission characteristics of the compound nucleus 280Ds. The nuclear reaction used is 232Th+48Ca. The result revealed how nuclei such as this fission predominantly by expelling closed shell nuclei such as 132Sn (Z = 50, N = 82).[33]

### Theoretical calculations

#### Decay characteristics

Theoretical calculation in a quantum tunneling model reproduces the experimental alpha decay half-live data.[34][35] It also predicts that the isotope 294Ds would have alpha decay half-life of the order of 311 years.[36][37]

#### Evaporation residue cross sections

The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels. The channel with the highest expected yield is given.

DNS = Di-nuclear system; σ = cross section

Target | Projectile | CN | Channel (product) | σmax | Model | Ref

|
|
|
|
|
|

208Pb  | 64Ni | 272Ds | 1n (271Ds) | 10 pb | DNS | [38]
232Th  | 48Ca | 280Ds | 4n (276Ds) | 0.2 pb | DNS | [39]
230Th  | 48Ca | 278Ds | 4n (274Ds) | 1 pb | DNS | [39]
238U  | 40Ar | 278Ds | 4n (274Ds) | 2 pb | DNS | [39]
244Pu  | 36S | 280Ds | 4n (276Ds) | 0.61 pb | DNS | [40]
248Cm  | 30Si | 278Ds | 4n (274Ds) | 65.32 pb | DNS | [40]
250Cm  | 30Si | 280Ds | 4n (276Ds) | 3.54 pb | DNS | [40]

## References

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Hofmann, S.; Heinz, S.; Mann, R. et al. (2016). "Review of even element super-heavy nuclei and search for element 120". The European Physical Journal A 2016 (52): 180. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16180-4. Bibcode: 2016EPJA...52..180H. https://zenodo.org/record/897926.
2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Oganessian, Yuri (6 May 2024). "Synthesis and decay properties of isotopes of element 110: 273Ds and 275Ds". Physical Review C 109 (5). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054307. Bibcode: 2024PhRvC.109e4307O.
3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Oganessian, Yu. Ts.Expression error: Unrecognized word "et". (2023). "New isotope 276Ds and its decay products 272Hs and 268Sg from the 232Th + 48Ca reaction". Physical Review C 108 (24611). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024611. Bibcode: 2023PhRvC.108b4611O.
4. ↑ Kovrizhnykh, N.D.. "On the way to the synthesis of new elements: 119 and 120". https://indico.gsi.de/event/21160/contributions/85071/attachments/49852/75915/TASCA25_Contribution_Kovrizhnykh.pdf.
5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Oganessian, Yu. Ts.Expression error: Unrecognized word "et". (2022). "Investigation of 48Ca-induced reactions with 242Pu and 238U targets at the JINR Superheavy Element Factory". Physical Review C 106 (24612). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024612. Bibcode: 2022PhRvC.106b4612O.
6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Såmark-Roth, A.; Cox, D. M.; Rudolph, D. et al. (2021). "Spectroscopy along Flerovium Decay Chains: Discovery of 280Ds and an Excited State in 282Cn". Physical Review Letters 126 (3). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032503. PMID 33543956. Bibcode: 2021PhRvL.126c2503S.
7. ↑ Forsberg, U.; Rudolph, D.; Andersson, L.-L. et al. (2016). "Recoil-α-fission and recoil-α–α-fission events observed in the reaction 48Ca + 243Am". Nuclear Physics A 953: 117–138. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.025. Bibcode: 2016NuPhA.953..117F.
8. ↑ Kaji, Daiya; Morita, Kosuke; Morimoto, Kouji et al. (2017). "Study of the Reaction 48Ca + 248Cm → 296Lv* at RIKEN-GARIS". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86 (3): 034201–1–7. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.86.034201. Bibcode: 2017JPSJ...86c4201K.
9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Armbruster, Peter; Munzenberg, Gottfried (1989). "Creating superheavy elements". Scientific American 34: 36–42.
10. ↑ Barber, Robert C.; Gäggeler, Heinz W.; Karol, Paul J.; Nakahara, Hiromichi; Vardaci, Emanuele; Vogt, Erich (2009). "Discovery of the element with atomic number 112 (IUPAC Technical Report)". Pure and Applied Chemistry 81 (7): 1331. doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-08-03-05.
11. ↑ Fleischmann, Martin; Pons, Stanley (1989). "Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium". Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry (Elsevier) 261 (2): 301–308. doi:10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3.
12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Scherer, U. W.; Brüchle, W; Brügger, M.; Frink, C.; Gäggeler, H.; Herrmann, G.; Kratz, J. V.; Moody, K. J. et al. (1990). "Reactions of 40Ar with 233U, 235U, and 238U at the barrier". Zeitschrift für Physik A 335 (4): 421–430. doi:10.1007/BF01290190. Bibcode: 1990ZPhyA.335..421S.
13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Hofmann, S.; Ninov, V.; Heßberger, F. P.; Armbruster, P.; Folger, H.; Münzenberg, G.; Schött, H. J.; Popeko, A. G. et al. (1995). "Production and decay of269110". Zeitschrift für Physik A 350 (4): 277–280. doi:10.1007/BF01291181. Bibcode: 1995ZPhyA.350..277H.
14. ↑ Ginter, T. N.; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Lee, D.; Kirbach, U.; Sudowe, R.; Folden, C.; Patin, J. et al. (2003). "Confirmation of production of element 110 by the 208Pb(64Ni,n) reaction". Physical Review C 67 (6). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.67.064609. Bibcode: 2003PhRvC..67f4609G. https://zenodo.org/record/1233771.
15. ↑ Ginter, T. N.; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Lee, D.; Kirbach, U.; Sudowe, R.; Folden, C.; Patin, J. et al. (8 December 2002). "Confirmation of production of element 110 by the 208Pb(64Ni,n) reaction". LBNL repositories. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5446&context=lbnl. (preprint)
16. ↑ Folden, C. M.; Gregorich, KE; Düllmann, ChE; Mahmud, H; Pang, GK; Schwantes, JM; Sudowe, R; Zielinski, PM et al. (2004). "Development of an Odd-Z-Projectile Reaction for Heavy Element Synthesis: 208Pb(64Ni,n)271Ds and 208Pb(65Cu,n)272111". Physical Review Letters 93 (21). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.212702. PMID 15601003. Bibcode: 2004PhRvL..93u2702F. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2704&context=lbnl.
17. ↑ Morita, K.; Morimoto, K.; Kaji, D.; Haba, H.; Ideguchi, E.; Kanungo, R.; Katori, K.; Koura, H. et al. (2004). "Production and decay of the isotope 271Ds (Z = 110)". The European Physical Journal A 21 (2): 257–263. doi:10.1140/epja/i2003-10205-1. Bibcode: 2004EPJA...21..257M.
18. ↑ George Johnson (15 October 2002). "At Lawrence Berkeley, Physicists Say a Colleague Took Them for a Ride". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/15/science/at-lawrence-berkeley-physicists-say-a-colleague-took-them-for-a-ride.html?scp=2&sq=victor ninov&st=cse&pagewanted=1.
19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Hofmann; Heßberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Antalic, S.; Cagarda, P.; Ćwiok, S.; Kindler, B.; Kojouharova, J. et al. (2001). "The new isotope 270110 and its decay products 266Hs and 262Sg". Eur. Phys. J. A 10 (1): 5–10. doi:10.1007/s100500170137. Bibcode: 2001EPJA...10....5H. http://www.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/etext/68/text/Hofmann_et_al_EPJ_A10_(2001)_5.pdf.
20. ↑ Ghiorso, A.; Lee, D.; Somerville, L. et al. (1995). "Evidence for the possible synthesis of element 110 produced by the 59Co+209Bi reaction". Physical Review C 51 (5): R2293–R2297. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.51.R2293. PMID 9970386. Bibcode: 1995PhRvC..51.2293G.
21. ↑ Hofmann, Sigurd (2002). On Beyond Uranium. Taylor & Francis. p. 150. ISBN 0-415-28496-1. https://archive.org/details/onbeyonduraniumj0000hofm/page/150.
22. ↑ Lazarev, Yu. A.; Lobanov, Yu.; Oganessian, Yu. et al. (1996). "α decay of 273110: Shell closure at N=162". Physical Review C 54 (2): 620–625. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.54.620. PMID 9971385. Bibcode: 1996PhRvC..54..620L.
23. ↑ Flerov lab annual report 2004
24. ↑ Emsley, John (2011). Nature's Building Blocks: An A–Z Guide to the Elements (New ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 590. ISBN 978-0-19-960563-7.
25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Sonzogni, Alejandro. "Interactive Chart of Nuclides". National Nuclear Data Center: Brookhaven National Laboratory. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/reCenter.jsp?z=110&n=171.
26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 "New darmstadtium isotope discovered at Superheavy Element Factory". Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. 27 February 2023. http://www.jinr.ru/posts/new-darmstadtium-isotope-discovered-at-superheavy-element-factory/.
27. ↑ Hofmann, S.; Ninov, V.; Heßberger, F. P.; Armbruster, P.; Folger, H.; Münzenberg, G.; Schött, H. J.; Popeko, A. G. et al. (1996). "The new element 112". Zeitschrift für Physik A 354 (1): 229–230. doi:10.1007/BF02769517. Bibcode: 1996ZPhyA.354..229H.
28. ↑ Public Affairs Department (26 October 2010). "Six New Isotopes of the Superheavy Elements Discovered: Moving Closer to Understanding the Island of Stability". Berkeley Lab. http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2010/10/26/six-new-isotopes.
29. ↑ Yeremin, A. V. (1999). "Synthesis of nuclei of the superheavy element 114 in reactions induced by 48Ca". Nature 400 (6741): 242–245. doi:10.1038/22281. Bibcode: 1999Natur.400..242O.
30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 Oganessian, Y. T.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Y.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Y.; Gulbekian, G. et al. (2004). "Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions 244Pu(48Ca,xn)292−x114 and 245Cm(48Ca,xn)293−x116". Physical Review C 69 (5). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.054607. Bibcode: 2004PhRvC..69e4607O.
31. ↑ see Oganesson
32. ↑ Hofmann, S (1998). "New elements - approaching". Reports on Progress in Physics 61 (6): 639–689. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/6/002. Bibcode: 1998RPPh...61..639H.
33. ↑ see Flerov lab annual report 2004
34. ↑ P. Roy Chowdhury; C. Samanta; D. N. Basu (2006). "α decay half-lives of new superheavy elements". Phys. Rev. C 73 (1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014612. Bibcode: 2006PhRvC..73a4612C.
35. ↑ C. Samanta; P. Roy Chowdhury; D. N. Basu (2007). "Predictions of alpha decay half lives of heavy and superheavy elements". Nucl. Phys. A 789 (1–4): 142–154. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.04.001. Bibcode: 2007NuPhA.789..142S.
36. ↑ P. Roy Chowdhury; Samanta, C.; Basu, D. N. (2008). "Search for long lived heaviest nuclei beyond the valley of stability". Phys. Rev. C 77 (4). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.044603. Bibcode: 2008PhRvC..77d4603C.
37. ↑ Chowdhury, P. Roy; C. Samanta; D. N. Basu (2008). "Nuclear half-lives for α -radioactivity of elements with 100 ≤ Z ≤ 130". Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 94 (6): 781–806. doi:10.1016/j.adt.2008.01.003. Bibcode: 2008ADNDT..94..781C.
38. ↑ Feng, Zhao-Qing; Jin, Gen-Ming; Li, Jun-Qing; Scheid, Werner (2007). "Formation of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions". Physical Review C 76 (4). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.044606. Bibcode: 2007PhRvC..76d4606F.
39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 Feng, Z; Jin, G; Li, J; Scheid, W (2009). "Production of heavy and superheavy nuclei in massive fusion reactions". Nuclear Physics A 816 (1–4): 33–51. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.11.003. Bibcode: 2009NuPhA.816...33F.
40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 Feng, Z.; Jin, G.; Li, J. (2009). "Production of new superheavy Z=108-114 nuclei with 238U, 244Pu and 248,250Cm targets". Physical Review C 80. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.057601.

* v
* t
* e

Isotopes of the chemical elements

| Group | 1 | 2 | 3 |  | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Period | Alkali metals  | Alkaline earth metals  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Pnicto­gens  | Chal­co­gens  | Halo­gens  | Noble gases
1 |

Iso's * List

1  |  |

Iso's * List

2 |

Iso's * List

3  |

Iso's * List

4  |  |

Iso's * List

5  |

Iso's * List

6  |

Iso's * List

7  |

Iso's * List

8  |

Iso's * List

9  |

Iso's * List

3 |

Iso's * List

11  |

Iso's * List

12  |  |

Iso's * List

13  |

Iso's * List

14  |

Iso's * List

15  |

Iso's * List

16  |

Iso's * List

17  |

Iso's * List

4 |

Iso's * List

19  |

Iso's * List

20  |

Iso's * List

21  |  |

Iso's * List

22  |

Iso's * List

23  |

Iso's * List

24  |

Iso's * List

25  |

Iso's * List

26  |

Iso's * List

27  |

Iso's * List

28  |

Iso's * List

29  |

Iso's * List

30  |

Iso's * List

31  |

Iso's * List

32  |

Iso's * List

33  |

Iso's * List

34  |

Iso's * List

35  |

Iso's * List

5 |

Iso's * List

37  |

Iso's * List

38  |

Iso's * List

39  |  |

Iso's * List

40  |

Iso's * List

41  |

Iso's * List

42  |

Iso's * List

43  |

Iso's * List

44  |

Iso's * List

45  |

Iso's * List

46  |

Iso's * List

47  |

Iso's * List

48  |

Iso's * List

49  |

Iso's * List

50  |

Iso's * List

51  |

Iso's * List

52  |

Iso's * List

53  |

Iso's * List

6 |

Iso's * List

55  |

Iso's * List

56  |

Iso's * List

57  |  |

Iso's * List

72  |

Iso's * List

73  |

Iso's * List

74  |

Iso's * List

75  |

Iso's * List

76  |

Iso's * List

77  |

Iso's * List

78  |

Iso's * List

79  |

Iso's * List

80  |

Iso's * List

81  |

Iso's * List

82  |

Iso's * List

83  |

Iso's * List

84  |

Iso's * List

85  |

Iso's * List

7 |

Iso's * List

87  |

Iso's * List

88  |

Iso's * List

89  |  |

Iso's * List

104  |

Iso's * List

105  |

Iso's * List

106  |

Iso's * List

107  |

Iso's * List

108  |

Iso's * List

109  |

Iso's * List

110  |

Iso's * List

111  |

Iso's * List

112  |

Iso's * List

113  |

Iso's * List

114  |

Iso's * List

115  |

Iso's * List

116  |

Iso's * List

117  |

Iso's * List

118
|  |  |  |  |

Iso's * List

58  |

Iso's * List

59  |

Iso's * List

60  |

Iso's * List

61  |

Iso's * List

62  |

Iso's * List

63  |

Iso's * List

64  |

Iso's * List

65  |

Iso's * List

66  |

Iso's * List

67  |

Iso's * List

68  |

Iso's * List

69  |

Iso's * List

70  |

Iso's * List

71  |
|  |

Iso's * List

90  |

Iso's * List

91  |

Iso's * List

92  |

Iso's * List

93  |

Iso's * List

94  |

Iso's * List

95  |

Iso's * List

96  |

Iso's * List

97  |

Iso's * List

98  |

Iso's * List

99  |

Iso's * List

100  |

Iso's * List

101  |

Iso's * List

102  |

Iso's * List

103

* Table of nuclides
* Categories: Isotopes
* Tables of nuclides
* Metastable isotopes
* Isotopes by element

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes of darmstadtium. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Physics:Isotopes_of_darmstadtium&oldid=4369434"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template