Comparison of structured storage software

Short description: None

Structured storage is computer storage for structured data, often in the form of a distributed database.[1] Computer software formally known as structured storage systems include Apache Cassandra,[2] Google's Bigtable[3] and Apache HBase.[4]

## Comparison

The following is a comparison of notable structured storage systems.

Project Name  | Type  | Persistence | Replication  | High Availability  | Transactions | Rack-locality Awareness  | Implementation Language  | Influences, Sponsors | License

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Aerospike | NoSQL database  | Yes, Hybrid DRAM and flash for persistence  | Yes  | Yes, Distributed for scale  | Yes  | Yes  | C (small bits of assembly language)  | Aerospike  | AGPL v3
AllegroGraph | Graph database | Yes  | No - v5, 2010  | Yes  | Yes  | No  | Common Lisp | Franz Inc.  | Proprietary
Apache Ignite | Key-value  | To and from an underlying persistent storage (e.g. an RDBMS)  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Java | Apache, GridGain Systems  | Apache 2.0
Apache Jackrabbit | Key-value & Hierarchical & Document  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | likely  | Java | Apache, Roy Fielding, Day Software | Apache 2.0
Berkeley DB/Dbm 1.x  | Key-value  | Yes  | No  | No  | No  | No  | C | old school  | Various
Berkeley DB Sleepycat/Oracle Berkeley DB 5.x  | Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | No  | C, C++, or Java  | dbm, Sleepycat/Oracle  | dual GPL-like Sleepycat License
Apache Cassandra | Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Distributed  | Partial Only supports CAS (Check And Set) after 2.1.1 and later[5][6] | Yes  | Java  | Dynamo and Bigtable, Facebook/Digg/Rackspace  | Apache 2.0
ClustrixDB | scale-out relational  | Yes  | Yes  | Distributed and Replication  | Yes  | No  | C  | Clustrix  | Proprietary
Coherence | Key-value  | Persistent data typically in an RDBMS | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Java | Oracle (previously Tangosol)  | Proprietary
Oracle NoSQL Database | Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | No  | Java  | Oracle  | AGPLv3 License or proprietary
Couchbase  | Document  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes, with two-phase commits[7] | Yes  | C++, Erlang, C,[8] Go | CouchDB, Memcached | Apache 2.0
CouchDB  | Document  | Yes  | Yes  | replication + load balancing  | Atomicity is per document, per CouchDB instance[9] | No  | Erlang | Lotus Notes / Ubuntu, Mozilla, IBM  | Apache 2.0
Extensible Storage Engine(ESE/NT)  | Document or Key-value  | Yes  | No  | No  | Yes  | No  | C++, Assembly  | Microsoft | Proprietary
FoundationDB | Ordered Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Depends on user configuration  | C++  | FoundationDB  | Proprietary
GT.M | Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Depends on user configuration  | C (small bits of assembly language)  | FIS  | AGPL v3
Project Name  | Type  | Persistence  | Replication  | High Availability  | Transactions  | Rack-locality Awareness  | Implementation Language  | Influences, Sponsors  | License
Apache HBase | Key-value  | Yes. Major version upgrades require re-import.  | Yes HDFS,[10] Amazon S3[11] or Amazon Elastic Block Store.[12] | Yes[13] | Yes[14] | See HDFS, S3 or EBS.  | Java  | Bigtable | Apache 2.0
Information Management System IBM IMS aka DB1  | Key-value. Multi-level  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes, with HALDB  | Yes, with IMS TM  | Unknown  | Assembler | IBM since 1966  | Proprietary
Infinispan | Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Java  | Red Hat  | Apache 2.0
Memcached | Key-value  | No  | No  | No  | Partial Only supports CAS (Check And Set - or Compare And Swap)[15][16] | No  | C  | Six Apart/Couchbase/Fotolog/Facebook  | BSD-like permissive copyright by Danga
LevelDB | Key-value, Bigtable | Yes  | No  | No  | Partial Multiple writes can be combined into single operation  | No  | C++  | Google  | New BSD License
LightningDB | Key-value, memory-mapped files  | Yes  | No  | No  | Yes, ACID, MVCC  | No  | C  | Symas  | OpenLDAP Public License
MongoDB | Document (JSON)  | Yes  | Yes  | fail-over  | Partial Single document atomicity[17] | No  | C++  | 10gen  | GNU AGPL v3.0
Neo4j | Graph database | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | No  | Java  | Neo Technology  | GNU GPL v3.0
OrientDB | Multi-Model (Graph-Document-Object-Key/Value)  | Yes  | Yes[18] | Yes[19] | Yes[20] | Yes  | Java  | Orient Technologies  | Apache 2.0
Redis | Key-value  | Yes. But last few queries can be lost.[21] | Yes  | Yes[22] | Yes[23] | No  | Ansi-C  | VMWare, Memcache  | BSD
Scylla | Key-value  | Yes  | Yes  | Distributed and Replication[24] | No[25] | Unknown  | C++  | Apache Cassandra | AGPL v3
SimpleDB (Amazon.com)  | Document & Key-value  | Yes  | Yes (automatic)  | Yes  | Unknown  | likely  | Erlang  | Amazon.com  | Amazon internal only
Tarantool | Free-dimensional tuples with primary and secondary keys  | Yes. (Asynchronous)  | Yes  | Yes  | Yes  | No  | C, Lua[26] | Memcached, Mnesia, MySQL, Mail.ru  | BSD
Project Name  | Type  | Persistence  | Replication  | High Availability  | Transactions  | Rack-locality Awareness  | Implementation Language  | Influences, Sponsors  | License

## See also

* NoSQL

## References

1. ↑ Hamilton, James (3 November 2009). "Perspectives: One Size Does Not Fit All". http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/CommentView,guid,afe46691-a293-4f9a-8900-5688a597726a.aspx.
2. ↑ Lakshman, Avinash; Malik, Prashant. Cassandra - A Decentralized Structured Storage System. Cornell University. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/projects/ladis2009/papers/lakshman-ladis2009.pdf. Retrieved 13 November 2009.
3. ↑ Chang, Fay; Jeffrey Dean; Sanjay Ghemawat; Wilson C. Hsieh; Deborah A. Wallach; Mike Burrows; Tushar Chandra; Andrew Fikes et al.. Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data. http://labs.google.com/papers/bigtable-osdi06.pdf. Retrieved 13 November 2009.
4. ↑ Kellerman, Jim. "HBase: structured storage of sparse data for Hadoop". http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HBase/HBasePresentations?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=hbaseintro.pdf.
5. ↑ java - Cassandra - transaction support - Stack Overflow
6. ↑ Lightweight transactions
7. ↑ Providing transactional logic
8. ↑ Damien Katz (January 8, 2013). "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of C". http://damienkatz.net/2013/01/the_unreasonable_effectiveness_of_c.html.
9. ↑ "How do I use transactions with CouchDB?". http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Frequently_asked_questions#How_do_I_use_transactions_with_CouchDB.3F.
10. ↑ HBase: Bigtable-like structured storage for Hadoop HDFS
11. ↑ HBase on EC2
12. ↑ HBase on EC2 using EBS volumes : Lessons Learned | My AWS Musings
13. ↑ Hbase/MultipleMasters - Hadoop Wiki
14. ↑ ACID in HBase
15. ↑ sql - Memcache with transactions? - Stack Overflow
16. ↑ Memcached
17. ↑ Atomic Operations - MongoDB
18. ↑ "OrientDB Replication". http://www.orientechnologies.com/docs/last/orientdb.wiki/Replication.html.
19. ↑ "OrientDB Distributed Architecture Lifecycle". http://www.orientechnologies.com/docs/last/orientdb.wiki/Distributed-Architecture-Lifecycle.html.
20. ↑ "OrientDB Transactions". http://www.orientechnologies.com/docs/last/orientdb.wiki/Transactions.html.
21. ↑ Redis Persistence
22. ↑ high availability - Redis master/slave replication - single point of failure? - Stack Overflow
23. ↑ Transactions – Redis
24. ↑ "Scylla Architecture - Fault Tolerance" (in en). http://docs.scylladb.com/architecture/architecture-fault-tolerance/.
25. ↑ "Scylla Apache Cassandra Compatibility" (in en). http://docs.scylladb.com/cassandra-compatibility/.
26. ↑ "Tarantool". 29 April 2022. https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool.

* v
* t
* e

Cloud computing

As a service|

* Content as a service
* Data as a service
* Desktop as a service
* Function as a service
* Infrastructure as a service
* Mobile backend as a service
* Network as a service
* Platform as a service
* Security as a service
* Software as a service

Technologies|

* Cloud database
* Cloud storage
* Data centers
* Distributed file system for cloud
* Hardware virtualization
* Internet
* Native cloud application
* Networking
* Security
* Structured storage
* Virtual appliance
* Web APIs
* Virtual private cloud

Applications|

* Box
* Dropbox
* Google
* G Suite
* Docs, Sheets and Slides
* HP Cloud (closed)
* Microsoft Online
* Oracle Cloud
* Rackspace
* Salesforce
* Workday
* Zoho

Platforms|

* Alpha7
* Amazon Web Services
* AppScale
* Box
* Bluemix
* CloudBolt
* Cloud Foundry
* Cocaine (PaaS)
* Engine Yard
* Helion
* GE Predix
* Google App Engine
* GreenQloud
* Heroku
* Inktank
* Jelastic
* Mendix
* Microsoft Azure
* MindSphere
* Netlify
* Oracle Cloud
* OutSystems
* openQRM
* OpenShift
* PythonAnywhere
* RightScale
* Scalr
* Force.com
* SAP Cloud Platform
* VMware vCloud Air
* WaveMaker

Infrastructure|

* Amazon
* Abiquo Enterprise Edition
* CloudStack
* Citrix Cloud
* CtrlS
* DigitalOcean
* EMC Atmos
* Eucalyptus
* Fujitsu
* GoGrid
* Google Cloud Platform
* GreenButton
* GreenQloud
* IBM Cloud
* iland
* Joyent
* Lunacloud
* Mirantis
* Nimbula
* Nimbus
* OpenIO
* OpenNebula
* OpenStack
* Oracle Cloud
* OrionVM
* Rackspace Cloud
* Safe Swiss Cloud
* SoftLayer
* Zadara Storage
* libvirt
* libguestfs
* OVirt
* Virtual Machine Manager
* Wakame-vdc
* Virtual Private Cloud OnDemand

* Category
* Commons

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison of structured storage software. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Comparison_of_structured_storage_software&oldid=3368578"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template