Distributed social network

Short description: Collection of services that communicate through a common protocol

This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: There is over a decade of information missing, especially within the past 2 years. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (September 2024)

|

A distributed social network (not to be confused with a decentralized or federated social network) is a network wherein all participating social networking services can communicate with each other through a unified communication protocol, and all participants are equal. Users that reside on a compatible service can interact with any user from any compatible service without having to log on to the origin's website. From a societal perspective, one may compare this concept to that of social media being a public utility. Federated social networks contrast with social network aggregation services, which are used to manage accounts and activities across multiple discrete social networks that cannot communicate with each other. A popular example for a federated social network is the fediverse, with more niche examples such as IndieWeb complementing the network.

Services that want to natively connect into a federated social network need to be interoperable with both the majority of content that the network produces (either through converting the content into the service's native format or by adding the ability to read the content in its intended presentation) and the common protocol that the services use. The protocols that are used for federated social networking are generally portable and independent of a service's architecture so it can be easily adopted across various services without requiring a refactoring of its design to accommodate the network, although platforms that do incorporate support for a federated network typically do so to improve the user experience and make the network's effects more clear for users.

A few social networking service providers have used the term more broadly to describe provider-specific services that can be installed across different websites, typically through added widgets or plugins. Through the add-ons, the social network functionality is redirected to the users' social networking service.

## Contents

* 1 History
* 2 Differences between distributed and federated networks
* 3 Active projects
* 4 See also
* 5 References
* 6 Further reading
* 7 External links

## History

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a US legal defense organization and advocacy group for civil liberties on the Internet, endorses the distributed social network model as one "that can plausibly return control and choice to the hands of the Internet user" and allow persons living under restrictive regimes to "conduct activism on social networking sites while also having a choice of services and providers that may be better equipped to protect their security and anonymity".[1]

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the main international standards organization for the World Wide Web, launched a new Social Activity in July 2014 to develop standards for social web application interoperability.[2]

In 2013, the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) released a candidate version of the Social Network Web enabler (SNeW) that was approved in 2016. Its specification is based mainly on OStatus and OpenSocial specifications and designed to meet GDPR recommendations. It is a tentative of the telco industry to establish a operated-led federation of social network services.[3]

## Differences between distributed and federated networks

See also: Peer-to-peer

Both kinds of networks are decentralized. However, distribution goes further than federation. A federated network has multiple centers, whereas a distributed network has no center at all.[4]

## Active projects

While early federated social networking projects traditionally developed a protocol along with their software to fit the needs of the desired architecture, modern projects use a protocol and network that already exists to accelerate adoption of their platform by allowing existing users of other services to migrate seamlessly to the new project. Software that is developed for such networks are almost always free and open-source software, with the protocols in use being open standards that do not charge royalty fees for actions that are taken on the network.

Various open standards that are used to provide a complete network include OAuth for authenticating users and managing their sessions, the ActivityPub protocol for federating content between services, WebFinger for discovering profiles and content on the network, as well as various standards for metadata such as Microformats, Open Graph and others. While this combination of technologies are most associated with the concept of a federated social network and are universal among these networks, the federation protocol has been a major source on controversy regarding the ideal architecture for transmitting content. While ActivityPub (and its predecessors OStatus and ActivityPump) have been used by most services when implementing support for a federated social network, alternatives have been created over the years that attempt to fix perceived issues with the current stack of standards. The most successful of these alternatives has been the AT Protocol, an open standard created by Bluesky that has been built to solve various portability, discovery and content format issues that have arisen with the adoption of ActivityPub among a variety of social networking services. A more experimental protocol that has built its own networking stack is Nostr, which has been designed to be simple for implementors to build as it has no dependencies on any existing standards. The protocol has gained some traction among newer SNSes, particularly within the cryptocurrency community.

While many of these standards have been in use for both early and modern projects, some older projects typically used standards such as OStatus, XRDS, Portable Contacts, the Wave Federation Protocol, XMPP, OpenSocial, microformats like XFN and hCard, and Atom web feeds. Some of these standards were referred to as the Open Stack, due to their status as open standards.[5]

## See also

* AT Protocol
* Comparison of software and protocols for distributed social networking
* Fediverse
* Nostr

## References

1. ↑ Richard Esguerra (21 March 2012). "An Introduction to the Federated Social Network". Electronic Frontier Foundation Deeplinks Blog. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/03/introduction-distributed-social-network.
2. ↑ "W3C Launches Push for Social Web Application Interoperability". World Wide Web Consortium. 21 July 2014. http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/3958.
3. ↑ "OMA Social Network Web (SNeW) v1.0". Open Mobile Alliance. 13 August 2013. https://www.openmobilealliance.org/release/SNeW/.
4. ↑ "Unlike Us | Beyond distributed and decentralized: what is a federated network?". https://networkcultures.org/unlikeus/resources/articles/what-is-a-federated-network/.
5. ↑ Recordon, David (9 October 2008). ""Blowing Up" Social Networks by Going Open". p. 27. http://www.slideshare.net/daveman692/blowing-up-social-networks-by-going-open-presentation/.

## Further reading

* Paper on FOAF in an Android environment by Tramp, S., Frischmuth, P., Arndt, N., Ermilov, T., and Auer, S. (2011). Weaving a distributed, semantic social network for mobile users. In Antoniou, G., editor, ESWC 2011, Part I, LNCS 6643, pages 200–214.

## External links

* W3C Social Activity
* W3C Social Web Working Group
* W3C Social Interest Group
* Federated Social Web Conference 2011
* Video by Henry Story demonstrating FOAF in an Android environment
* BuddyCloud
* Mastodon

* v
* t
* e

Social networks and social media

Types|

* Personal
* Professional
* Sexual
* Value
* Clique
* Adolescent

Networks|

* Distributed social network (list)
* Enterprise social networking
* Mobile social network
* Personal knowledge networking

Services|

* List of social networking websites
* List of virtual communities with more than 1 million users

Concepts and
theories|

* Assortative mixing
* Interpersonal bridge
* Organizational network analysis
* Small-world experiment
* Social aspects of television
* Social capital
* Social data revolution
* Social exchange theory
* Social identity theory
* Social network analysis
* Social web
* Structural endogamy

Models and
processes|

* Aggregation
* Change detection
* Collaboration graph
* Collaborative consumption
* Giant Global Graph
* Lateral communication
* Social graph
* Social network analysis software
* Social networking potential
* Social television
* Structural cohesion

Economics|

* Collaborative finance
* Social commerce

Phenomena|

* Community recognition
* Complex contagion
* Consequential strangers
* Friend of a friend
* Friendship paradox
* Six degrees of separation
* Social media addiction
* Social invisibility
* Social network game
* Social occultation
* Tribe

Related topics|

* Researchers
* User profile
* Viral messages
* Virtual community

Books|

* Social Invisibility is not a Fiction it Exists

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed social network. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Distributed_social_network&oldid=4002767"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template