Jobless recovery

Short description: Economic phenomenon

A jobless recovery or jobless growth is an economic phenomenon in which a macroeconomy experiences growth while maintaining or decreasing its level of employment. The term was coined by the economist Nick Perna in the early 1990s.[1][2]

## Contents

* 1 Causes
* 1.1 Industrial consolidation
* 2 Population growth vs. employment growth
* 3 See also
* 4 Notes and references
* 5 External links

## Causes

Some argue that a jobless recovery is caused by increased productivity through automation, which allows economic growth without reducing unemployment or enabling economies to provide universal basic income.[3] However, critics view this as an example of the luddite fallacy,[4] suggesting instead that jobless recoveries result from structural changes in the labor market.[5] These changes lead to unemployment as workers require new skills, but the education system has not adapted to provide relevant knowledge and competencies. Other economists attribute jobless recoveries to broader macroeconomic misalignments between endogenous growth, labor absorption capacity, and the distribution of income and wealth.[6]

### Industrial consolidation

Some have argued that the recent lack of job creation in the United States is due to increased industrial consolidation and growth of monopoly or oligopoly power.[7] The argument is twofold: firstly, small businesses create most American jobs, and secondly, small businesses have more difficulty starting and growing in the face of entrenched existing businesses (compare infant industry argument, applied at the level of industries, rather than individual firms).

## Population growth vs. employment growth

In addition to employment growth, population growth must also be considered concerning the perception of jobless recoveries. Immigrants (both legal and illegal) added to the workforce will often accept lower wages, causing persistent unemployment among those who were previously employed.[8][9]

Surprisingly, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does not offer data-sets isolated to the working-age population (ages 16 to 65).[10] Including retirement age individuals in most BLS data-sets may tend to obfuscate the analysis of employment creation in relation to population growth.[11] Additionally, incorrect assumptions about the term, Labor force, might also occur when reading BLS publications, millions of employable persons are not included within the official definition. The Labor force, as defined by the BLS,[12] is a strict definition of those officially unemployed (U-3),[13] and those who are officially employed (1 hour or more).[14]

Once again, the baby-boom generation has become a generator of change, this time in its retirement. Moreover, the jobless recovery of the 2001 recession, coupled with the severe economic impact of the 2007–2009 recession, caused disruptions in the labor market. In the first 12 years of the 21st century, the growth of the population has slowed and labor force participation rates generally have declined. As a result, labor force growth also has slowed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects that the next 10 years will bring about an aging labor force that is growing slowly, a declining overall labor force participation rate, and more diversity in the racial and ethnic composition of the labor force.

Bureau of Labor Statistics, Monthly Labor Review, December 2013.[11]

The following table and included chart depicts year-to-year employment growth in comparison to population growth for those persons under 65 years of age. As such, baby boomer retirements are removed from the data as a factor for consideration. The table includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, for the Civilian noninstitutional population and corresponding Employment Levels, dating from 1948 and includes October 2013, the age groups are 16 years & over, and 65 years & over.[10] The working-age population is then determined by subtracting those age 65 and over from the Civilian noninstitutional population and Employment Levels respectively. Isolated into the traditional working-age subset, growth in both employment levels and population levels are totaled by decade, an employment percentage rate is also displayed for comparison by decade.

When examined, by decade, the first decade of the 2000s, the United States suffered a 5% jobless rate when compared to the added working age population.

U.S. Growth: Employment level growth Vs. population level growth by decade  | Civilian noninstitutional population  | Working-age population  | Employment levels  | Working-age employment

|
|
|
|

Year  | Age: 16 years & over  | Age: 65 yrs. & over  | Age: 16 to 65 yrs.  | Growth – decade  | Age: 16 years & over  | Age: 65 yrs. & over  | Age: 16 to 65  | Growth – decade  | Percent emp.
1948 | 103,468,000 | 10,881,000 | 92,587,000 |  | 58,554,000 | 2,906,000 | 55,648,000 |  |
1949 | 104,524,000 | 11,191,000 | 93,333,000 | — | 57,712,000 | 2,926,000 | 54,786,000 | — | —
1950 | 104,872,000 | 11,534,000 | 93,338,000 |  | 59,352,000 | 2,845,000 | 56,507,000 |  |
1951 | 104,810,000 | 11,918,000 | 92,892,000 |  | 60,252,000 | 2,858,000 | 57,394,000 |  |
1952 | 105,812,000 | 12,334,000 | 93,478,000 |  | 60,748,000 | 3,000,000 | 57,748,000 |  |
1953 | 107,623,000 | 13,257,000 | 94,366,000 |  | 59,796,000 | 2,882,000 | 56,914,000 |  |
1954 | 108,892,000 | 13,520,000 | 95,372,000 |  | 59,990,000 | 2,963,000 | 57,027,000 |  |
1955 | 110,296,000 | 13,925,000 | 96,371,000 |  | 63,268,000 | 3,213,000 | 60,055,000 |  |
1956 | 111,526,000 | 14,215,000 | 97,311,000 |  | 63,619,000 | 3,213,000 | 60,406,000 |  |
1957 | 113,013,000 | 14,516,000 | 98,497,000 |  | 63,598,000 | 3,089,000 | 60,509,000 |  |
1958 | 114,429,000 | 14,821,000 | 99,608,000 |  | 63,266,000 | 2,855,000 | 60,411,000 |  |
1959 | 116,040,000 | 15,148,000 | 100,892,000 | 7,559,000 | 64,927,000 | 3,024,000 | 61,903,000 | 7,117,000 | 94.15%
1960 | 118,001,000 | 15,508,000 | 102,493,000 |  | 65,287,000 | 3,176,000 | 62,111,000 |  |
1961 | 119,214,000 | 15,861,000 | 103,353,000 |  | 65,531,000 | 2,885,000 | 62,646,000 |  |
1962 | 121,236,000 | 16,880,000 | 104,356,000 |  | 66,585,000 | 2,821,000 | 63,764,000 |  |
1963 | 123,360,000 | 17,014,000 | 106,346,000 |  | 67,791,000 | 2,765,000 | 65,026,000 |  |
1964 | 125,468,000 | 17,296,000 | 108,172,000 |  | 69,543,000 | 2,913,000 | 66,630,000 |  |
1965 | 127,294,000 | 17,580,000 | 109,714,000 |  | 71,819,000 | 2,926,000 | 68,893,000 |  |
1966 | 128,730,000 | 17,860,000 | 110,870,000 |  | 73,600,000 | 2,892,000 | 70,708,000 |  |
1967 | 130,936,000 | 18,194,000 | 112,742,000 |  | 75,337,000 | 3,030,000 | 72,307,000 |  |
1968 | 133,120,000 | 18,500,000 | 114,620,000 |  | 76,699,000 | 3,086,000 | 73,613,000 |  |
1969 | 135,489,000 | 18,825,000 | 116,664,000 | 15,772,000 | 78,789,000 | 3,069,000 | 75,720,000 | 13,817,000 | 87.60%
1970 | 138,529,000 | 19,202,000 | 119,327,000 |  | 78,651,000 | 3,032,000 | 75,619,000 |  |
1971 | 141,666,000 | 19,605,000 | 122,061,000 |  | 80,527,000 | 3,005,000 | 77,522,000 |  |
1972 | 145,446,000 | 20,229,000 | 125,217,000 |  | 83,424,000 | 2,909,000 | 80,515,000 |  |
1973 | 148,479,000 | 20,536,000 | 127,943,000 |  | 86,390,000 | 2,787,000 | 83,603,000 |  |
1974 | 151,494,000 | 21,214,000 | 130,280,000 |  | 86,169,000 | 2,794,000 | 83,375,000 |  |
1975 | 154,589,000 | 21,803,000 | 132,786,000 |  | 86,689,000 | 2,680,000 | 84,009,000 |  |
1976 | 157,438,000 | 22,309,000 | 135,129,000 |  | 89,850,000 | 2,791,000 | 87,059,000 |  |
1977 | 160,377,000 | 22,874,000 | 137,503,000 |  | 94,183,000 | 2,903,000 | 91,280,000 |  |
1978 | 163,272,000 | 23,450,000 | 139,822,000 |  | 97,669,000 | 3,006,000 | 94,663,000 |  |
1979 | 166,300,000 | 24,067,000 | 142,233,000 | 25,569,000 | 100,013,000 | 3,002,000 | 97,011,000 | 21,291,000 | 83.27%
1980 | 168,883,000 | 24,597,000 | 144,286,000 |  | 99,579,000 | 2,907,000 | 96,672,000 |  |
1981 | 171,166,000 | 25,109,000 | 146,057,000 |  | 99,562,000 | 2,928,000 | 96,634,000 |  |
1982 | 173,199,000 | 25,619,000 | 147,580,000 |  | 98,849,000 | 2,878,000 | 95,971,000 |  |
1983 | 175,121,000 | 26,160,000 | 148,961,000 |  | 102,803,000 | 2,878,000 | 99,925,000 |  |
1984 | 177,306,000 | 26,712,000 | 150,594,000 |  | 106,049,000 | 2,797,000 | 103,252,000 |  |
1985 | 179,112,000 | 27,266,000 | 151,846,000 |  | 108,063,000 | 2,841,000 | 105,222,000 |  |
1986 | 181,547,000 | 27,791,000 | 153,756,000 |  | 110,588,000 | 2,909,000 | 107,679,000 |  |
1987 | 183,620,000 | 28,362,000 | 155,258,000 |  | 113,679,000 | 3,126,000 | 110,553,000 |  |
1988 | 185,402,000 | 28,875,000 | 156,527,000 |  | 115,978,000 | 3,264,000 | 112,714,000 |  |
1989 | 187,165,000 | 29,462,000 | 157,703,000 | 15,470,000 | 117,698,000 | 3,352,000 | 114,346,000 | 17,335,000 | 112.06%
1990 | 190,017,000 | 29,453,000 | 160,564,000 |  | 118,110,000 | 3,256,000 | 114,854,000 |  |
1991 | 191,798,000 | 29,893,000 | 161,905,000 |  | 117,395,000 | 3,193,000 | 114,202,000 |  |
1992 | 193,784,000 | 30,396,000 | 163,388,000 |  | 118,990,000 | 3,341,000 | 115,649,000 |  |
1993 | 195,794,000 | 30,784,000 | 165,010,000 |  | 121,578,000 | 3,394,000 | 118,184,000 |  |
1994 | 197,765,000 | 31,181,000 | 166,584,000 |  | 124,729,000 | 3,641,000 | 121,088,000 |  |
1995 | 199,508,000 | 31,629,000 | 167,879,000 |  | 125,136,000 | 3,676,000 | 121,460,000 |  |
1996 | 201,636,000 | 31,902,000 | 169,734,000 |  | 127,903,000 | 3,807,000 | 124,096,000 |  |
1997 | 204,098,000 | 32,071,000 | 172,027,000 |  | 130,785,000 | 3,933,000 | 126,852,000 |  |
1998 | 206,270,000 | 32,275,000 | 173,995,000 |  | 132,732,000 | 3,855,000 | 128,877,000 |  |
1999 | 208,832,000 | 32,538,000 | 176,294,000 | 18,591,000 | 134,696,000 | 3,984,000 | 130,712,000 | 16,366,000 | 88.03%
2000 | 213,736,000 | 33,590,000 | 180,146,000 |  | 137,846,000 | 4,244,000 | 133,602,000 |  |
2001 | 216,315,000 | 33,823,000 | 182,492,000 |  | 136,269,000 | 4,300,000 | 131,969,000 |  |
2002 | 218,741,000 | 34,004,000 | 184,737,000 |  | 136,599,000 | 4,248,000 | 132,351,000 |  |
2003 | 222,509,000 | 34,432,000 | 188,077,000 |  | 138,556,000 | 4,711,000 | 133,845,000 |  |
2004 | 224,640,000 | 34,796,000 | 189,844,000 |  | 140,278,000 | 4,902,000 | 135,376,000 |  |
2005 | 227,425,000 | 35,208,000 | 192,217,000 |  | 142,918,000 | 5,263,000 | 137,655,000 |  |
2006 | 230,108,000 | 35,841,000 | 194,267,000 |  | 146,081,000 | 5,617,000 | 140,464,000 |  |
2007 | 233,156,000 | 36,603,000 | 196,553,000 |  | 146,334,000 | 5,787,000 | 140,547,000 |  |
2008 | 235,035,000 | 37,522,000 | 197,513,000 |  | 143,350,000 | 6,084,000 | 137,266,000 |  |
2009 | 236,924,000 | 38,362,000 | 198,562,000 | 22,268,000 | 137,953,000 | 6,193,000 | 131,760,000 | 1,048,000 | 4.71%
2010 | 238,889,000 | 39,045,000 | 199,844,000 |  | 139,159,000 | 6,376,000 | 132,783,000 |  |
2011 | 240,584,000 | 40,364,000 | 200,220,000 |  | 140,681,000 | 6,893,000 | 133,788,000 |  |
2012 | 244,350,000 | 42,695,000 | 201,655,000 |  | 143,060,000 | 7,412,000 | 135,648,000 |  |
2013 | 246,745,000 | 44,155,000 | 202,590,000 |  | 144,423,000 | 7,748,000 | 136,675,000 |  |
2014 | 249,027,000 | 45,685,000 | 203,342,000 |  | 147,190,000 | 8,140,000 | 139,050,000 |  |
2015 | 251,936,000 | 47,269,000 | 204,667,000 |  | 149,703,000 | 8,552,000 | 141,151,000 |  |
2016 | 254,742,000 | 48,837,000 | 205,905,000 | 7,343,000 | 151,798,000 | 8,820,000 | 142,978,000 | 11,218,000 | 152.77%
Pre and Post 2000 Comparisons (working age)
|  |  |  | Pop. Growth |  |  |  | Employment Growth
1900s | 1950 to 1999 | 82,961,000 |  |  |  | 75,926,000 | 91.52%
2000s | 2000 to 2016 | 29,611,000 |  |  |  | 12,266,000 | 41.42%
Bold denotes datum used to produce "Working-Age: Growth Decade" calculation
Decade example = End of year 1949 to end of year 1959
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey[10]
Series Id: LNU00000000 Not Seasonally Adjusted Series title: (Unadj.) population Level
Labor force status: Civilian noninstitutional population age: 16 years and over
Series Id: LNU02000000 Not Seasonally Adjusted Series title: (Unadj.) employment Level
Labor force status: Employed Age: 16 years and over
Series Id:LNU00000097 Not Seasonally Adjusted Series title: (Unadj.) population Level - 65 yrs. & over
Labor force status: Civilian noninstitutional population age: 65 years and over
Series Id: LNU02000097 Not Seasonally Adjusted Series title: (Unadj.) employment Level - 65 yrs. & over
Labor force status: Employed Age: 65 years and over

## See also

* Deindustrialization
* Employment-to-population ratio
* Global labor arbitrage
* Involuntary unemployment
* Lost Decades
* Offshoring
* Structural unemployment

## Notes and references

1. ↑ "INDUSTRY ADOPTS POLITICAL PLANKS FOR NEW DEAL WAR; OLD ORDER IS UPHELD". New York Times. 6 December 1935. https://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/"jobless+recovery"/since1851/allresults/1/allauthors/oldest/. "Pay Articles from December 1935 Part 7 - Site Map - The New York ..."
2. ↑ Smith, Lisa (2010-08-17). "Jobless Recovery: The New Normal Since 1990 | Investopedia" (in en-US). http://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/10/jobless-recovery-the-new-normal.asp.
3. ↑ Automatic Reaction, The Economist, 2010-09-09, https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2010/09/09/automatic-reaction
4. ↑ Easterly, William (2001). The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. pp. 53–54. ISBN 0-262-55042-3. https://archive.org/details/elusivequestforg00will/page/53.
5. ↑ Surowiecki, James (2010-12-26). "The Jobs Crisis" (in en-US). The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/01/03/the-jobs-crisis.
6. ↑ Erica L. Groshen; Simon Potter (Aug 2003). "Has Structural Change Contributed to a Jobless Recovery?". Federal Reserve Bank of New York. http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci9-8.html.
7. ↑ Who Broke America’s Jobs Machine? Why creeping consolidation is crushing American livelihoods., by Barry C. Lynn and Phillip Longman, Washington Monthly
8. ↑ Camerota Ph.D., Stephen A. (October 2004). "A Jobless Recovery?: Immigrant Gains and Native Losses". Center for Immigration Studies. https://cis.org/node/245. "Between March of 2000 and 2004, the number of unemployed adult natives increased by 2.3 million, while the number of employed adult immigrants increased by 2.3 million."
9. ↑ Peri, Giovanni. "Immigration, Labor Markets, and Productivity". Cato Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Winter 2012).. http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj32n1/cj32n1-4.pdf. "In this case firms pay immigrants less than their marginal productivity, increasing the firms’ profits. Such cost-savings on immigrants act as an increase in productivity for firms."
10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 "Bureau of Labor Statistics". Current Population Survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/data/.
11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Toossi, Mitra (1 December 2013). "Labor force projections to 2022: the labor force participation rate continues to fall". Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/pdf/labor-force-projections-to-2022-the-labor-force-participation-rate-continues-to-fall.pdf.
12. ↑ "Glossary". Labor Force. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/bls/glossary.htm#L. "Labor force (Current Population Survey) The labor force includes all persons classified as employed or unemployed in accordance with the definitions contained in this glossary."
13. ↑ "Economic News Release". HOUSEHOLD DATA Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm.
14. ↑ "BLS Information". Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/dolfaq/bls_ques23.htm.

## External links

* Exploding Productivity Growth: Context, Causes, and Implications

* v
* t
* e

Basic income topics

Topics|

* Basic income models
* Basic income pilots
* Citizen's dividend
* Guaranteed minimum income
* Jobless recovery
* Negative income tax
* Real freedom
* Right to an adequate standard of living
* Technological unemployment

Organizations|

* Basic Income Alliance
* Basic Income Earth Network
* Enhet
* Green Party
* Pirate Party
* Party of Humanists
* ReCivitas
* Vivant

Advocates|

| Historic|

* C. H. Douglas
* Milton Friedman
* Ailsa McKay
* Thomas Paine
* Juliet Rhys-Williams
* Anthony Barber

|

Contemporary|

* Étienne Chouard
* Harry F. Dahms
* André Gorz
* Sepp Kusstatscher
* Guy Standing
* Eduardo Suplicy
* Philippe Van Parijs
* Carole Pateman
* Christopher Pissarides
* Claus Offe
* Katja Kipping
* Götz Werner
* Richard David Precht
* Valter Mutt
* Annika Lillemets
* Osmo Soininvaara
* Li Andersson
* Susanne Wiest
* Birger Schlaug
* Christian Engström
* Benoit Hamon
* Björn Wahlroos
* Andrew Yang

Related programs|

* Alaska Permanent Fund
* Asignación Universal por Hijo
* Bolsa Família
* Iranian subsidy reform plan
* Omitara
* Quatinga Velho

By region|

* Brazil
* Canada
* Germany
* India
* Japan
* Netherlands
* Nordic countries
* United Kingdom
* United States
* Global

Works|

* Agrarian Justice (pamphlet)
* The Basic Income (documentary)

* v
* t
* e

Employment

Classifications|

* Casual
* Contingent
* Full-time
* Part-time
* Self-employed
* Skilled
* Independent contractor
* Temporary
* Tenure
* Unskilled
* Wage labour

Hiring|

* Application
* Background check
* Business networking
* Contract
* Cover letter
* Curriculum Vitae (CV)
* Drug testing
* e-recruitment
* Employment counsellor
* Executive search (list)
* Induction programme
* Job fair
* Job fraud
* Job hunting
* Job interview
* Labour brokering
* Overqualification
* Onboarding
* Personality-job fit theory
* Person-environment fit
* Probation
* Reference
* Résumé
* Simultaneous recruiting of new graduates
* Underemployment
* Work-at-home scheme

Roles|

* Mentorship
* Co-op
* Employee
* Employer
* Internship
* Job
* Permanent
* Permatemp
* Supervisor
* Volunteer

Worker class|

* Blue-collar
* Green-collar
* Grey-collar
* Pink-collar
* White-collar

Career and training|

* Apprenticeship
* Avocation
* Career assessment
* Career counseling
* Career development
* Coaching
* Creative class
* Education
* Continuing education
* Continuing professional development
* E-learning
* Employability
* Further education
* Graduate school
* Induction training
* Initial Professional Development
* Knowledge worker
* Licensure
* Lifelong learning
* Practice-based professional learning
* Professional association
* Professional certification
* Professional development
* Professional school
* Reflective practice
* Retraining
* Vocational education
* Vocational school
* Vocational university
* Mentorship
* Occupational Outlook Handbook
* Practice firm
* Profession
* Tradesman
* Vocation

Attendance|

* Break
* Career break
* Furlough
* Gap year
* Leave of absence
* Long service leave
* No call, no show
* Sabbatical
* Sick leave
* Time clock

Schedules|

* Four-day week
* Eight-hour day
* 996
* Flextime
* Overtime
* Retroactive overtime
* Shift work
* Telecommuting
* Working time
* Workweek and weekend

Wages and salaries|

* Income bracket
* Income tax
* Living wage
* Maximum wage
* National average salary
* World
* Europe
* Minimum wage
* Canada
* Hong Kong
* Europe
* United States
* Progressive wage
* Singapore
* Overtime rate
* Paid time off
* Performance-related pay
* Salary
* Salary cap
* Working poor

Benefits|

* Annual leave
* Casual Friday
* Day care
* Disability insurance
* Health insurance
* Life insurance
* Marriage leave
* Parental leave
* Pension
* Sick leave
* Take-home vehicle

Safety and health|

* Epilepsy and employment
* Human factors and ergonomics
* Industrial noise
* Karōshi
* Protective clothing
* Occupational burnout
* Occupational disease
* Occupational exposure limit
* Occupational health psychology
* Occupational injury
* Occupational stress
* Repetitive strain injury
* Sick building syndrome
* Work accident
* Occupational fatality
* Workers' compensation
* Workplace phobia
* Workplace wellness

Equality|

* Affirmative action
* Equal pay for women
* Gender pay gap
* Glass ceiling

Infractions|

* Corporate abuse
* Accounting scandals
* Corporate behaviour
* Corporate crime
* Control fraud
* Corporate scandals
* Discrimination
* Dress code
* Employee handbook
* Employee monitoring
* Evaluation
* Labour law
* Sexual harassment
* Sleeping while on duty
* Wage theft
* Whistleblower
* Workplace bullying
* Workplace harassment
* Workplace incivility

Willingness|

* Boreout
* Civil conscription
* Conscription
* Dead-end job
* Extreme careerism
* Job satisfaction
* Organizational commitment
* McJob
* Refusal of work
* Slavery
* Bonded labour
* Human trafficking
* Labour camp
* Penal labour
* Peonage
* Truck system
* Unfree labour
* Wage slavery
* Workaholic
* Work aversion
* Work ethic
* Work–life balance
* Downshifting (lifestyle)
* Slow living

Termination|

* At-will employment
* Dismissal
* Banishment room
* Constructive dismissal
* Wrongful dismissal
* Employee exit management
* Exit interview
* Layoff
* Notice period
* Pink slip
* Resignation
* Letter of resignation
* Restructuring
* Retirement
* Mandatory retirement
* Retirement age
* Severance package
* Golden handshake
* Golden parachute
* Turnover

Unemployment|

* Barriers to Employment
* Depression
* Great Depression
* Long Depression
* Discouraged worker
* Frictional unemployment
* Full employment
* Graduate unemployment
* Involuntary unemployment
* Jobless recovery
* Phillips curve
* Recession
* Great Recession
* Great Recession job losses
* List of recessions
* Recession-proof job
* Reserve army of labour
* Types of unemployment
* Unemployment Convention
* Unemployment benefits
* Unemployment extension
* Unemployment insurance
* Unemployment rates
* Employment rates
* Employment-to-population ratio
* Structural unemployment
* Technological unemployment
* Wage curve
* Youth unemployment

See also templates

* Aspects of corporations
* Aspects of jobs
* Aspects of occupations
* Aspects of organizations
* Aspects of workplaces
* Corporate titles
* Organized labor

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobless recovery. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Finance:Jobless_recovery&oldid=4112405"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template