Mobile marketing research

Mobile marketing research is a method of data collection using the functions of mobile phones, smartphones, and PDAs. PDA stands for "Personal Digital Assistant." It refers to a handheld electronic device that provides functionalities like computing, organizing, and communicating. PDAs were popular in the late 1990s and early 2000s before smartphones became prevalent. They typically included features such as calendars, contact lists, note-taking applications, and basic computing capabilities. Notable examples of PDAs include the Palm Pilot, BlackBerry, and early versions of the Pocket PC. It utilizes mobile communication for research purposes.[1]

## Contents

* 1 Background
* 2 Definition and development
* 3 Mobile survey methods
* 3.1 Methodology of data collection
* 3.2 Data collection on a technical view
* 4 Disadvantages and difficulties of mobile market research
* 5 Advantages and possibilities of mobile market research
* 6 References

## Background

Survey on a mobile phone

Due to the deep sociocultural changes towards digitization at the turn of the 21st century, it has become more difficult for the marketing research industry to address respondents that are both willing to participate in surveys and who are reachable via traditional media. Consumers were no longer classified, which made it harder for marketing researchers to make obvious assumptions about their behavior. Researchers had to adapt their approaches to keep up with technology and cope with these changes in order to find out who their customers were and to establish their preferences.[2]

## Definition and development

Mobile phones are practical, versatile and have already become an indispensable device for communication, being used day and night. Smartphones, in particular, offer many different kinds of applications to fulfill further technical requirements. Several mobile applications provide mobile market research through smart phones. This is the basis to allow conducting empirical research studies.[3] Besides the number of mobile phones, the number of smartphones and PDAs is still growing. In 2006, the number of worldwide mobile phone users exceeded the number of landline users. According to a study of PEW (Internet & American Life Projects) which examined more than 1000 internet leaders, analysts, and executives, mobile devices will become the most often used instrument to connect to the internet by the year 2020. According to Pew Research’s Internet & American Life study in January 2014, 58% of adults in the US had a smartphone,[4] up from 56% in May 2013. In other parts of the world, like Central and Latin America, many people never had a PC, but they now have a smartphone. For instance, in Chile, more than 85% of the participants of an online panel had a smartphone in 2014, whereas only around 60% had a desktop.[5] For many people, the mobile phone is already a kind of "life-support tool”. Therefore, conducting surveys via mobile phones could help to counteract the generally declining motivation of respondents, as many potential participants enjoy using electronic devices. Particularly, it is difficult to reach the younger generation through traditional media, compared to more modern media such as cell phones. Therefore, this medium is very appropriate to address this target group.[6][7] Even if some respondents declare that they still prefer to answer web surveys through PCs, the proportion which prefers to answer through smartphones is significant across many different countries.[8]

## Mobile survey methods

### Methodology of data collection

According to Maxl, four different kinds of methods are distinguished which can be used as required. These are listed in the following figure.

Introduction: Mobile market research methods[9]

Push studies without contexts (A) are conducted independently from time and location. This can be CATI- or CACI studies as well as surveys by SMS or MMS. In cases of these research methods, the feedback impulse actively comes from the researcher. With contextual push studies (B) the researcher prompts the respondent to give appropriate feedback once it is recognized that he/she is located in a particular environment or is in a certain situation.[10] Pull studies are characterized that participants call in the questionnaire themselves. In many cases, short notes draw attention to a survey or an evaluation. Such communications may be placed in certain contexts (C) (e.g. on receipts, advertisements, or product packaging) to encourage participation. Non-context-sensitive pull studies (D) are not relevant for marketing research since they provide only general feedback, which has no relation to a fixed object of research. Therefore, they are hardly controlled and evaluated.[11]

### Data collection on a technical view

On the technical level, three different possibilities of data collection are distinguished according to Pferdekämper/Batinic. The Short Message Service (SMS) outlines one possibility, which can be used as a basis to conduct interviews. This is very suitable for ad hoc surveys if particular key questions have to be answered. For Java applications, the participants receive a link to a WAP page where an application is to be downloaded. The survey software is immediately installed on the mobile phone and the survey can be filled out straight away.

Furthermore, surveys can be accessed via the mobile internet. The webpage is also called in via WAP push. Questionnaires are created and designed in different formats. This allows disruption to complete the questionnaire to further process on a different technical device with internet access.[12]

## Disadvantages and difficulties of mobile market research

The most important point to be discussed is the representativity of the sampling regarding the quality of data. Based on the total population, those people who don’t own a mobile phone, cannot become part of the sampling. Mobile phone users have to be able to be reached as well as to be willing to take part in the survey. But it is by far not enough to just look at the users of mobile phones. Equally important is to also know the number of people who use the SMS service and how many of these people own a web-enabled phone. Only if all these aspects are noticed, a conclusion regarding the sampling can be drawn.[13] For these reasons, a mobile survey does not meet the standards of statistical representativity. As mentioned in the beginning, the restricted possibilities to access WAP-Surveys are another problem. The number of those who use the internet via their mobile phone is rather small: According to IFCom, only 19% of all mobile phone users do so.[14] But the data acquisition through mobile phones holds more difficulties. On the one hand, there are high costs for Incentives and intensive recruitment by the institutes. On the other hand, the participants of the survey have to pay the costs for internet usage via mobile phone. However, more and more respondents do not pay the internet access based on the time spent on the Internet and more and more places propose free Wi-Fi, making this issue less and less relevant for respondents. Additionally, there are also technical difficulties that may occur. The high number of different and not-compatible software or the low transmission rate of data are just a few to name. To improve the respondents' experience in answering web surveys on mobile devices, optimizing the layout of the survey for smaller screens is crucial: non-optimized layouts lead to lower data quality.[15] Restrictions concerning the reveal and passing on of mobile phone numbers (because of data protection and the lack of Anonymity) are setting limits to the research in this field of study, too.[16]

## Advantages and possibilities of mobile market research

Statistical methods in mobile market research profit from the fact that they do not depend on place or time.[17] This means that surveys via mobile phone can be done anywhere and at any time and are therefore much more advantageous compared to surveys via landline phones. Considering that a high number of participants of the main target groups cannot be reached at home at most hours of the day,[18] the chance to get hold of them by mobile phone is much higher. Especially concerning to people under the age of 25 as well as business people, who are often on the way and cannot get hold of easily, the chances of the mobile market research are promising. As most people always carry their mobile phones with them, an immediate transmission of personal impressions of current events is possible at any time.[16] Thus, the so-called ‘magic moment’ can be captured, which is often very helpful. Surveys concerning product placement and efficiency of sales promotion measures at the point of sale turned out to be perfectly realizable this way. Looking at the topic “Access possibilities to WAP-Surveys” by mobile phone, as well as at the topic “Getting hold of potential participants”, there are some developments that should be named. The trend towards the increasing distribution of web-enabled mobile phones, and the improved representativity that comes along with it, does continue from 2007 to 2008, Nielsen Mobile noticed an increase in mobile internet usage.[19] With decreasing costs and improving technology, a further upward tendency can be expected. In addition, mobile internet usage increases with the rapidly developing distribution of smartphones. According to IM (Mediawork Initiative), already in 2013 more people will log in with their smartphones, than with a PC. Mobile statistics show a high and very fast response rate. As a result of the independence from time and place, answers can be submitted immediately. This also means that results can almost be transmitted in real-time. A study from Globalpark shows that approximately 35% of the participants answered a mobile survey within 2 hours.[20] Through the novelty of the form of the survey and its playful design, mobile research has a motivating effect on the participants. This applies especially to young, technologically interested male persons. iPhone users are also considered to be very communicative. As the devices are easy to handle, the users are more likely and more motivated to take part in surveys.[21] A study examining how to best reach mobile respondents published in the Journal of Social Science Computer Review underlines the importance of social factors. Especially their subjective belief of how they are seen by significant others, or their intention of how they would like to be seen by significant others seem to play a major role in their mobile phone behavior.[7]

## References

1. ↑ Maxl, Emanuel: Mobile Market Research: Analysis through the Mobile Phone, in: Maxl/Döring/Wallisch (Hrsg.): Mobile Market Research (Neue Schriften zur Online-Forschung 7), Herbert von Halem Verlag, Köln, 2009, p.12
2. ↑ Kaufmann, Gwen: Die Marktmacht des Konsumenten, in: Planung & Analyse, 2/2010 (Sonderteil: Jahreskongress für Marktforschung - Zukunft der Märkte - Märkte der Zukunft, April 2010), p.5
3. ↑ Maxl, Emanuel / Döring, Nicola / Wallisch, Astrid: Introduction, in: Maxl/Döring/Wallisch (Hrsg.): Mobile Market Research (Neue Schriften zur Online-Forschung 7), Herbert von Halem Verlag, Köln, 2009, p.7
4. ↑ "The Web at 25 in the U.S.". February 27, 2014. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/27/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s/.
5. ↑ Revilla, M, Toninelli, D, Ochoa, C and Loewe, G. 2015. Who Has Access to Mobile Devices in an Online Opt-in Panel? An Analysis of Potential Respondents for Mobile Surveys. In: Toninelli, D, Pinter, R & de Pedraza, P (eds.) Mobile Research Methods: Opportunities and Challenges of Mobile Research Methodologies, Pp. 119–139. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bar.h. License: CC-BY 4.0.
6. ↑ Tarkus, Astrid: Usability of Mobile surveys, in: Maxl/Döring/Wallisch (Hrsg.): Mobile Market Research (Neue Schriften zur Online-Forschung 7), Herbert von Halem Verlag, Köln, 2009, p.154
7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Burger, Christoph; Riemer, Valentin; Grafeneder, Jürgen; Woisetschläger, Bianca; Vidovic, Dragana; Hergovich, Andreas (2010). "Reaching the Mobile Respondent: Determinants of High-Level Mobile Phone Use Among a High-Coverage Group". Social Science Computer Review 28 (3): 336–349. doi:10.1177/0894439309353099. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/andreas.hergovich/php/reaching_the_mobile_respondent_soc.sci.comp.rev.pdf.
8. ↑ Revilla, M.; Toninelli, D.; Ochoa, C.; Loewe, G. (2016). "Do online access panels really need to allow and adapt surveys to mobile devices?". Internet Research 26 (5): 1209–1227. doi:10.1108/IntR-02-2015-0032.
9. ↑ Figure according to Maxl (2009), p.18
10. ↑ Maxl (2009), pp.18-20
11. ↑ Döring, Nicola: Psychological Aspects of Interviewing by Cellular Telephone, Presentation / MRC 2010, London, 2010
12. ↑ Pferdekämper, Tanja / Batinic, Bernad: Mobile Surveys from a technical perspective, in: Maxl/Döring/Wallisch (Hrsg.): Mobile Market Research (Neue Schriften zur Online-Forschung 7), Herbert von Halem Verlag, Köln, 2009, pp.122-125
13. ↑ Busse, Britta / Fuchs, Marek: Relative Coverage Biases for Mobile Phone and Mobile Web Surveys, in: Maxl/Döring/Wallisch (Hrsg.): Mobile Market Research (Neue Schriften zur Online-Forschung 7), Herbert von Halem Verlag, Köln, 2009, p.223-226
14. ↑ "IFCom Crossmedia 2010 - Wer sind die mobilen Onliner?" (in de). February 2010. http://www.ifcom-research.de/ifcom_crossmedia_2010.pdf.
15. ↑ Revilla, M.; Toninelli, D.; Ochoa, C. (2016). "PCs versus Smartphones in answering web surveys: does the device make a difference?". Survey Practice 9 (4): 1–6. doi:10.29115/SP-2016-0021. http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/article/view/338/pdf_72.
16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Maxl (2009), p.15
17. ↑ Maxl (2009), p.16
18. ↑ Romano (2009), p.251
19. ↑ Busse/Fuchs (2009), p.223
20. ↑ Kaufmann (2010), p.5
21. ↑ Maxl (2009), pp.13-16

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile marketing research. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Finance:Mobile_marketing_research&oldid=444670"