Fundamental theorem of asset pricing

Short description: Necessary and sufficient conditions for a market to be arbitrage free and complete

This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader. (May 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

|

The fundamental theorems of asset pricing (also: of arbitrage, of finance) provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a market to be arbitrage free and for a market to be complete. An arbitrage opportunity is a way of making money with no initial investment without any possibility of loss. Though arbitrage opportunities do exist briefly in real life, it has been said that any sensible market model must avoid this type of profit.[1]:5 The first theorem is important in that it ensures a fundamental property of market models. Completeness is a common property of market models (for instance the Black–Scholes model). A complete market is one in which every contingent claim can be replicated. Though this property is common in models, it is not always considered desirable or realistic.[1]:30

## Contents

* 1 Discrete markets
* 2 In more general markets
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 External links

## Discrete markets

In a discrete (i.e. finite state) market, the following hold:[1]

1. The First Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing: A discrete market, on a discrete probability space (Ω, [math]\displaystyle{ \scriptstyle \mathcal{F} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ \scriptstyle \mathcal{P} }[/math]), is arbitrage-free if, and only if, there exists at least one risk neutral probability measure that is equivalent to the original probability measure, P.
2. The Second Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing: An arbitrage-free market (S,B) consisting of a collection of stocks S and a risk-free bond B is complete if and only if there exists a unique risk-neutral measure that is equivalent to P and has numeraire B.

## In more general markets

When stock price returns follow a single Brownian motion, there is a unique risk neutral measure. When the stock price process is assumed to follow a more general sigma-martingale or semimartingale, then the concept of arbitrage is too narrow, and a stronger concept such as no free lunch with vanishing risk must be used to describe these opportunities in an infinite dimensional setting.[2]

## See also

* Arbitrage pricing theory
* Asset pricing
* Rational pricing

## References

Sources

1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Pascucci, Andrea (2011) PDE and Martingale Methods in Option Pricing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
2. ↑ Delbaen, Freddy; Schachermayer, Walter. "What is... a Free Lunch?" (pdf). Notices of the AMS 51 (5): 526–528. http://www.ams.org/notices/200405/what-is.pdf. Retrieved October 14, 2011.

Further reading

* Harrison, J. Michael; Pliska, Stanley R. (1981). "Martingales and Stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading". Stochastic Processes and their Applications 11 (3): 215–260. doi:10.1016/0304-4149(81)90026-0.
* Delbaen, Freddy; Schachermayer, Walter (1994). "A General Version of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing". Mathematische Annalen 300 (1): 463–520. doi:10.1007/BF01450498.

## External links

* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/~wschach/pubs/preprnts/prpr0118a.pdf

0.00

(0 votes)

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Fundamental_theorem_of_asset_pricing&oldid=76080"