Linearity of differentiation

Short description: Calculus property

In calculus, the derivative of any linear combination of functions equals the same linear combination of the derivatives of the functions;[1] this property is known as linearity of differentiation, the rule of linearity,[2] or the superposition rule for differentiation.[3] It is a fundamental property of the derivative that encapsulates in a single rule two simpler rules of differentiation, the sum rule (the derivative of the sum of two functions is the sum of the derivatives) and the constant factor rule (the derivative of a constant multiple of a function is the same constant multiple of the derivative).[4][5] Thus it can be said that differentiation is linear, or the differential operator is a linear operator.[6]

## Contents

* 1 Statement and derivation
* 2 Detailed proofs/derivations from definition
* 2.1 Linearity (directly)
* 2.2 Sum
* 2.3 Difference
* 2.4 Constant coefficient
* 3 See also
* 4 References

## Statement and derivation

Let f and g be functions, with α and β constants. Now consider

ddx(α⋅f(x)+β⋅g(x)).

By the sum rule in differentiation, this is

ddx(α⋅f(x))+ddx(β⋅g(x)),

and by the constant factor rule in differentiation, this reduces to

α⋅f′(x)+β⋅g′(x).

Therefore,

ddx(α⋅f(x)+β⋅g(x))=α⋅f′(x)+β⋅g′(x).

Omitting the brackets, this is often written as:

(α⋅f+β⋅g)′=α⋅f′+β⋅g′.

## Detailed proofs/derivations from definition

We can prove the entire linearity principle at once, or, we can prove the individual steps (of constant factor and adding) individually. Here, both will be shown.

Proving linearity directly also proves the constant factor rule, the sum rule, and the difference rule as special cases. The sum rule is obtained by setting both constant coefficients to 1. The difference rule is obtained by setting the first constant coefficient to 1 and the second constant coefficient to −1. The constant factor rule is obtained by setting either the second constant coefficient or the second function to 0. (From a technical standpoint, the domain of the second function must also be considered - one way to avoid issues is setting the second function equal to the first function and the second constant coefficient equal to 0. One could also define both the second constant coefficient and the second function to be 0, where the domain of the second function is a superset of the first function, among other possibilities.)

On the contrary, if we first prove the constant factor rule and the sum rule, we can prove linearity and the difference rule. Proving linearity is done by defining the first and second functions as being two other functions being multiplied by constant coefficients. Then, as shown in the derivation from the previous section, we can first use the sum law while differentiation, and then use the constant factor rule, which will reach our conclusion for linearity. In order to prove the difference rule, the second function can be redefined as another function multiplied by the constant coefficient of −1. This would, when simplified, give us the difference rule for differentiation.

In the proofs/derivations below,[7][8] the coefficients a,b are used; they correspond to the coefficients α,β above.

### Linearity (directly)

Let a,b∈ℝ. Let f,g be functions. Let j be a function, where j is defined only where f and g are both defined. (In other words, the domain of j is the intersection of the domains of f and g.) Let x be in the domain of j. Let j(x)=af(x)+bg(x).

We want to prove that j′(x)=af′(x)+bg′(x).

By definition, we can see that

j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h=limh->0(af(x+h)+bg(x+h))−(af(x)+bg(x))h=limh->0af(x+h)+bg(x+h)−af(x)−bg(x)h=limh->0af(x+h)−af(x)+bg(x+h)−bg(x)h=limh->0(af(x+h)−af(x))+(bg(x+h)−bg(x))h=limh->0(af(x+h)−af(x)h+bg(x+h)−bg(x)h)=limh->0(a(f(x+h)−f(x))h+b(g(x+h)−g(x))h)=limh->0(af(x+h)−f(x)h+bg(x+h)−g(x)h)

In order to use the limits law for the sum of limits, we need to know that limh->0af(x+h)−f(x)h and limh->0bg(x+h)−g(x)h both individually exist. For these smaller limits, we need to know that limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h and limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h both individually exist to use the coefficient law for limits. By definition, f′(x)=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h and g′(x)=limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h. So, if we know that f′(x) and g′(x) both exist, we will know that limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h and limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h both individually exist. This allows us to use the coefficient law for limits to write

limh->0af(x+h)−f(x)h=alimh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h

and

limh->0bg(x+h)−g(x)h=blimh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h.

With this, we can go back to apply the limit law for the sum of limits, since we know that limh->0af(x+h)−f(x)h and limh->0bg(x+h)−g(x)h both individually exist. From here, we can directly go back to the derivative we were working on.j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h⋮=limh->0(af(x+h)−f(x)h+bg(x+h)−g(x)h)=limh->0(af(x+h)−f(x)h)+limh->0(bg(x+h)−g(x)h)=alimh->0(f(x+h)−f(x)h)+blimh->0(g(x+h)−g(x)h)=af′(x)+bg′(x)Finally, we have shown what we claimed in the beginning: j′(x)=af′(x)+bg′(x).

### Sum

Let f,g be functions. Let j be a function, where j is defined only where f and g are both defined. (In other words, the domain of j is the intersection of the domains of f and g.) Let x be in the domain of j. Let j(x)=f(x)+g(x).

We want to prove that j′(x)=f′(x)+g′(x).

By definition, we can see that

j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h=limh->0(f(x+h)+g(x+h))−(f(x)+g(x))h=limh->0f(x+h)+g(x+h)−f(x)−g(x)h=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)+g(x+h)−g(x)h=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x))+(g(x+h)−g(x))h=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x)h+g(x+h)−g(x)h)In order to use the law for the sum of limits here, we need to show that the individual limits, limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h and limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h both exist. By definition, f′(x)=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)hand g′(x)=limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h, so the limits exist whenever the derivatives f′(x) and g′(x) exist. So, assuming that the derivatives exist, we can continue the above derivation

j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h⋮=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x)h+g(x+h)−g(x)h)=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h+limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h=f′(x)+g′(x)

Thus, we have shown what we wanted to show, that: j′(x)=f′(x)+g′(x).

### Difference

Let f,g be functions. Let j be a function, where j is defined only where f and g are both defined. (In other words, the domain of j is the intersection of the domains of f and g.) Let x be in the domain of j. Let j(x)=f(x)−g(x).

We want to prove that j′(x)=f′(x)−g′(x).

By definition, we can see that: j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h=limh->0(f(x+h)−(g(x+h))−(f(x)−g(x))h=limh->0f(x+h)−g(x+h)−f(x)+g(x)h=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)−g(x+h)+g(x)h=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x))+(−g(x+h)+g(x))h=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x))−(g(x+h)−g(x))h=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x)h−g(x+h)−g(x)h)

In order to use the law for the difference of limits here, we need to show that the individual limits, limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h and limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h both exist. By definition, f′(x)=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h and that g′(x)=limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h, so these limits exist whenever the derivatives f′(x) and g′(x) exist. So, assuming that the derivatives exist, we can continue the above derivation

j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h⋮=limh->0(f(x+h)−f(x)h−g(x+h)−g(x)h)=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h−limh->0g(x+h)−g(x)h=f′(x)−g′(x)

Thus, we have shown what we wanted to show, that: j′(x)=f′(x)−g′(x).

### Constant coefficient

Let f be a function. Let a∈ℝ; a will be the constant coefficient. Let j be a function, where j is defined only where f is defined. (In other words, the domain of j is equal to the domain of f.) Let x be in the domain of j. Let j(x)=af(x).

We want to prove that j′(x)=af′(x).

By definition, we can see that:

j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h=limh->0af(x+h)−af(x)h=limh->0a(f(x+h)−f(x))h=limh->0af(x+h)−f(x)h

Now, in order to use a limit law for constant coefficients to show that

limh->0af(x+h)−f(x)h=alimh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h we need to show that limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h exists. However, f′(x)=limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h, by the definition of the derivative. So, if f′(x) exists, then limh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h exists.

Thus, if we assume that f′(x) exists, we can use the limit law and continue our proof.

j′(x)=limh->0j(x+h)−j(x)h⋮=limh->0af(x+h)−f(x)h=alimh->0f(x+h)−f(x)h=af′(x)

Thus, we have proven that when j(x)=af(x), we have j′(x)=af′(x).

## See also

* Differentiation of integrals - Problem in mathematics
* Differentiation of trigonometric functions - Mathematical process of finding the derivative of a trigonometric function
* Differentiation rules - Rules for computing derivatives of functions
* Distribution (mathematics) - Mathematical analysis term similar to generalized function
* General Leibniz rule - Generalization of the product rule in calculus
* Integration by parts - Mathematical method in calculus
* Inverse functions and differentiation - Calculus identity
* Product rule - Formula for the derivative of a product
* Quotient rule - Formula for the derivative of a ratio of functions
* Vector calculus identities - Mathematical identities

## References

1. ↑ Blank, Brian E.; Krantz, Steven George (2006), Calculus: Single Variable, Volume 1, Springer, p. 177, ISBN 9781931914598, https://books.google.com/books?id=hMY8lbX87Y8C&pg=PA177 .
2. ↑ Strang, Gilbert (1991), Calculus, Volume 1, SIAM, pp. 71–72, ISBN 9780961408824, https://books.google.com/books?id=OisInC1zvEMC&pg=PA71 .
3. ↑ Stroyan, K. D. (2014), Calculus Using Mathematica, Academic Press, p. 89, ISBN 9781483267975, https://books.google.com/books?id=C8DiBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA89 .
4. ↑ Estep, Donald (2002), "20.1 Linear Combinations of Functions", Practical Analysis in One Variable, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, pp. 259–260, ISBN 9780387954844, https://books.google.com/books?id=trC-jTRffesC&pg=PA259 .
5. ↑ Zorn, Paul (2010), Understanding Real Analysis, CRC Press, p. 184, ISBN 9781439894323, https://books.google.com/books?id=1WLNBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 .
6. ↑ Gockenbach, Mark S. (2011), Finite-Dimensional Linear Algebra, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, CRC Press, p. 103, ISBN 9781439815649, https://books.google.com/books?id=xP0RFUHWQI0C&pg=PA103 .
7. ↑ "Differentiation Rules". https://courseware.cemc.uwaterloo.ca/11/assignments/47/6.
8. ↑ Dawkins, Paul. "Proof Of Various Derivative Properties". https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/DerivativeProofs.aspx.

* v
* t
* e

Calculus

Precalculus|

* Binomial theorem
* Concave function
* Continuous function
* Factorial
* Finite difference
* Free variables and bound variables
* Fundamental theorem
* Graph of a function
* Linear function
* Mean value theorem
* Radian
* Rolle's theorem
* Secant
* Slope
* Tangent

Limits|

* Indeterminate form
* Limit of a function
* One-sided limit
* Limit of a sequence
* Orders of approximation
* (ε, δ)-definition of limit

Differential calculus|

* Chain rule
* Derivative
* Differential
* Differential equation
* Differential operator
* Implicit differentiation
* Inverse functions and differentiation
* L'Hôpital's rule
* Leibniz's rule
* Logarithmic derivative
* Mean value theorem
* Newton's method
* Notation
* Leibniz's notation
* Newton's notation
* Product rule
* Quotient rule
* Regiomontanus' angle maximization problem
* Related rates
* Simplest rules
* Constant factor rule in differentiation
* Linearity of differentiation
* Power rule
* Sum rule in differentiation
* Stationary point
* First derivative test
* Second derivative test
* Extreme value theorem
* Maxima and minima
* Taylor's theorem

Integral calculus|

* Antiderivative
* Arc length
* Constant of integration
* Differentiation under the integral sign
* Fundamental theorem of calculus
* Integral of secant cubed
* Integral of the secant function
* Integration by parts
* Integration by substitution
* Tangent half-angle substitution
* Partial fractions in integration
* Quadratic integral
* Proof that 22/7 exceeds π
* Simplest rules
* Constant factor rule in integration
* Linearity of integration
* Sum rule in integration
* Trapezoidal rule
* Trigonometric substitution

Vector calculus|

* Curl
* Directional derivative
* Divergence
* Divergence theorem
* Gradient
* Gradient theorem
* Green's theorem
* Laplacian
* Stokes' theorem

Multivariable calculus|

* Curvature
* Disc integration
* Divergence theorem
* Exterior
* Gabriel's Horn
* Geometric
* Hessian matrix
* Jacobian matrix and determinant
* Line integral
* Matrix
* Multiple integral
* Partial derivative
* Shell integration
* Surface integral
* Tensor
* Volume integral

Series|

* Abel's test
* Alternating
* Alternating series test
* Arithmetico-geometric sequence
* Binomial
* Cauchy condensation test
* Direct comparison test
* Dirichlet's test
* Euler–Maclaurin formula
* Fourier
* Geometric
* Harmonic
* Infinite
* Integral test for convergence
* Limit comparison test
* Maclaurin
* Power
* Ratio test
* Root test
* Taylor
* Term test

Special functions and numbers|

* Bernoulli numbers
* e (mathematical constant)
* Exponential function
* Natural logarithm
* Stirling's approximation

History of calculus|

* Adequality
* Brook Taylor
* Colin Maclaurin
* Generality of algebra
* Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
* Infinitesimal
* Infinitesimal calculus
* Isaac Newton
* Fluxion
* Law of Continuity
* Leonhard Euler
* Method of Fluxions
* The Method of Mechanical Theorems

Lists|

* Differentiation rules
* List of integrals of exponential functions
* List of integrals of hyperbolic functions
* List of integrals of inverse hyperbolic functions
* List of integrals of inverse trigonometric functions
* List of integrals of irrational functions
* List of integrals of logarithmic functions
* List of integrals of rational functions
* List of integrals of trigonometric functions
* List of limits
* List of mathematical symbols
* Lists of integrals

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linearity of differentiation. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Linearity_of_differentiation&oldid=184465"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template