Materialism

Materialism is a form of philosophical monism in metaphysics, according to which matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and all things, including mental states and consciousness, are results of material interactions. According to philosophical materialism, mind and consciousness are caused by physical processes, such as the neurochemistry of the human brain and nervous system, without which they cannot exist. Materialism directly contrasts with monistic idealism, according to which consciousness is the fundamental substance of nature.

Materialism is closely related to physicalism—the view that all that exists is ultimately physical. Philosophical physicalism has evolved from materialism with the theories of the physical sciences to incorporate forms of physicality in addition to ordinary matter (e.g. spacetime, physical energies and forces, and exotic matter). Thus, some prefer the term physicalism to materialism, while others use them as synonyms. Materialism is also related to naturalism—the position that only natural laws and forces operate in the universe.

Discoveries of neural correlates between consciousness and the brain are taken as empirical support for materialism, but some philosophers of mind find that association fallacious or consider it compatible with non-materialist ideas.[1][2] Alternative philosophies opposed or alternative to materialism or physicalism include idealism, pluralism, dualism, panpsychism, and other forms of monism.

Epicureanism is a philosophy of materialism from classical antiquity that was a major forerunner of modern science. Classical atomism predates Epicurus: fifth‑century BCE thinkers Leucippus and Democritus explained all change as the collisions of indivisible atoms moving in the void.[3] Epicureanism refined this materialist picture. Epicurus held that everything—including mind—consists solely of atoms moving in the void; to explain how parallel falling atoms could ever meet, he postulated the clinamen, an extremely slight lateral deviation that initiates collisions without invoking supernatural causes and that need not imply genuine indeterminism.[4][5]

In late modern philosophy, German atheist anthropologist Ludwig Feuerbach signaled a new turn in materialism in his 1841 book The Essence of Christianity, which presented a humanist account of religion as the outward projection of man's inward nature. Feuerbach introduced anthropological materialism, a version of materialism that views materialist anthropology as the universal science.[6]

Feuerbach's variety of materialism heavily influenced Karl Marx,[7] who in the late 19th century elaborated the concept of historical materialism—the basis for what Marx and Friedrich Engels outlined as scientific socialism.

## Contents

* 1 Overview
* 1.1 Non-reductive materialism
* 2 History
* 2.1 Early history
* 2.1.1 Before Common Era
* 2.1.2 Early Common Era
* 2.1.3 Modern philosophy
* 2.2 Contemporary history
* 2.2.1 Analytic philosophy
* 2.2.2 Continental philosophy
* 3 Defining "matter"
* 4 Physicalism
* 5 Religious and spiritual views
* 5.1 Christianity
* 6 Criticism and alternatives
* 6.1 From contemporary physicists
* 6.1.1 Quantum mechanics
* 6.1.2 Digital physics
* 6.2 Philosophical objections
* 6.2.1 Varieties of idealism
* 6.3 Materialism as methodology
* 7 See also
* 8 Notes
* 9 References
* 10 Further reading
* 11 External links

## Overview

File:Nebulosa de Eta Carinae o NGC 3372.jpgStars and a nebula

Materialism belongs to the class of monist ontology, and is thus different from ontological theories based on dualism or pluralism. For singular explanations of the phenomenal reality, materialism is in contrast to idealism, neutral monism, and spiritualism. It can also contrast with phenomenalism, vitalism, and dual-aspect monism. Its materiality can, in some ways, be linked to the concept of determinism, as espoused by Enlightenment thinkers.[8]

Despite the multiplicity of named schools, philosophy ultimately confronts a single binary: materialism versus idealism.[9] Uncompromising materialism—today often called physicalism—holds that the universe is nothing but matter‑energy in motion; every phenomenon, from stellar fusion to human thought, is exhaustively explicable as organised interactions of physical entities.[10] Matter is self‑moving and self‑organising, so it is scientifically superfluous to posit immaterial substances or disembodied minds. On this view, consciousness is a higher‑order property of certain complex material systems, not an ontological primitive. Idealism, by contrast, reverses the causal arrow: it elevates mind, spirit or abstract Forms to constitutive reality and demotes the material world to a mere appearance—a position that historically provided philosophical cover for religion and other supernatural doctrines.[11]

Although the Western canon was long dominated by explicit idealists—owing to church patronage, university control, and periodic censorship—materialist undercurrents never disappeared. Thinkers including the pre‑Socratic atomists, Lucretius, Baruch Spinoza, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and 20th‑century analytical naturalists advanced naturalistic explanations of mind and society even when such views risked condemnation or suppression.[11] Contemporary debate subdivides materialism into identity theory, functional and non‑reductive physicalism, eliminative materialism, and other variants, but all share the thesis that whatever exists is ultimately physical.[12]

Modern philosophical materialists extend the definition of other scientifically observable entities such as energy, forces, and the spacetime continuum; some philosophers, such as Mary Midgley, suggest that the concept of "matter" is elusive and poorly defined.[13]

During the 19th century, Marx and Engels broadened materialism into a materialist conception of history centred on concrete human activity—above all labour—and on the institutions that such activity creates, reproduces, or abolishes. Drawing on both ancient atomism and the modern materialism of their day, they forged what was later called Marxist materialism, eliminating residual idealist elements and unifying the results into a single, consistently materialist worldview (see Modern philosophy).[14][15] Marx’s materialism long predated his encounter with G. W. F. Hegel. While still a student, Marx filled seven Notebooks on Epicurean Philosophy (1839), analysing Democritus, Epicurus, and Lucretius from an avowedly materialist standpoint.[16] His 1841 doctoral dissertation, The Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature, likewise defends the ancient atomists against teleological speculation and affirms contingency in nature.[17] These texts show Marx already rejecting metaphysical dualism a decade before Capital.

Marx's subsequent Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843–44) therefore did not convert an idealist into a materialist; rather, the work borrows small aspects of Hegel’s idealist dialectic, grounds it in material world, and rejects it very explicitly.[18] Engels, arriving independently at a similar position, joined Marx in fusing Greek atomism, Enlightenment science, and a demystified dialectic into what later became known as Marxist materialism, a consistently materialist worldview that treats historical development as the product of human labour under definite social relations.[19][20]

### Non-reductive materialism

Materialism is often associated with reductionism, according to which the objects or phenomena individuated at one level of description, if they are genuine, must be explicable in terms of the objects or phenomena at some other level of description—typically, at a more reduced level.

Non-reductive materialism explicitly rejects this notion, taking the material constitution of all particulars to be consistent with the existence of real objects, properties or phenomena not explicable in the terms canonically used for the basic material constituents. Jerry Fodor held this view, according to which empirical laws and explanations in "special sciences" like psychology or geology are invisible from the perspective of basic physics.[21]

## History

### Early history

#### Before Common Era

Leucippus (4th century BC), father of atomism and teacher of Democritus. Painting by Luca Giordano, c. 1653.

Materialism developed, possibly independently, in several geographically separated regions of Eurasia during what Karl Jaspers termed the Axial Age (c. 800–200 BC).

In ancient Indian philosophy, materialism developed around 600 BC with the works of Ajita Kesakambali, Payasi, Kanada and the proponents of the Cārvāka school of philosophy. Kanada became one of the early proponents of atomism. The Nyaya–Vaisesika school (c. 600–100 BC) developed one of the earliest forms of atomism (although their proofs of God and their positing that consciousness was not material precludes labelling them as materialists). Buddhist atomism and the Jaina school continued the atomic tradition.[22]

#### Early Common Era

Wang Chong (27 – c. 100 AD) was a Chinese thinker of the early Common Era said to be a materialist.[23] Later Indian materialist Jayaraashi Bhatta (6th century) in his work Tattvopaplavasimha (The Upsetting of All Principles) refuted the Nyāya Sūtra epistemology. The materialistic Cārvāka philosophy appears to have died out some time after 1400; when Madhavacharya compiled Sarva-darśana-samgraha (A Digest of All Philosophies) in the 14th century, he had no Cārvāka (or Lokāyata) text to quote from or refer to.[24]

In early 12th-century al-Andalus, Arabian philosopher Ibn Tufail (a.k.a. Abubacer) discussed materialism in his philosophical novel, Hayy ibn Yaqdhan (Philosophus Autodidactus), while vaguely foreshadowing historical materialism.[25]

#### Modern philosophy

File:Lucretius pointing to the casus.jpgAtomists proposed that the universe consists of atoms moving in space. Of the Nature of Things by Lucretius, 1682.

In France, Pierre Gassendi (1592–1665)[26] represented the materialist tradition in opposition to the attempts of René Descartes (1596–1650) to provide the natural sciences with dualist foundations. There followed the materialist and atheist abbé Jean Meslier (1664–1729), along with the French materialists: Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709–1751), Denis Diderot (1713–1784), Étienne Bonnot de Condillac (1714–1780), Claude Adrien Helvétius (1715–1771), German-French Baron d'Holbach (1723–1789), and other French Enlightenment thinkers.[27]

In England, materialism was developed in the philosophies of Francis Bacon (1561–1626), Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679),[28] and John Locke (1632–1704).[29] Scottish Enlightenment philosopher David Hume (1711–1776) became one of the most important materialist philosophers in the 18th century.[30] John "Walking" Stewart (1747–1822) believed matter has a moral dimension, which had a major impact on the philosophical poetry of William Wordsworth (1770–1850).

In late modern philosophy, German atheist anthropologist Ludwig Feuerbach signaled a new turn in materialism in his 1841 book The Essence of Christianity, which presented a humanist account of religion as the outward projection of man's inward nature. Feuerbach introduced anthropological materialism, a version of materialism that views materialist anthropology as the universal science.[31]

Feuerbach's variety of materialism heavily influenced Karl Marx,[32] who in the late 19th century elaborated the concept of historical materialism—the basis for what Marx and Friedrich Engels outlined as scientific socialism:

> The materialist conception of history starts from the proposition that the production of the means to support human life and, next to production, the exchange of things produced, is the basis of all social structure; that in every society that has appeared in history, the manner in which wealth is distributed and society divided into classes or orders is dependent upon what is produced, how it is produced, and how the products are exchanged. From this point of view, the final causes of all social changes and political revolutions are to be sought, not in men's brains, not in men's better insights into eternal truth and justice, but in changes in the modes of production and exchange. They are to be sought, not in the philosophy, but in the economics of each particular epoch.

— Friedrich Engels, Socialism: Scientific and Utopian (1880)

Through his Dialectics of Nature (1883), Engels later developed a "materialist dialectic" philosophy of nature, a worldview that Georgi Plekhanov, the father of Russian Marxism, called dialectical materialism.[33] In early 20th-century Russian philosophy, Vladimir Lenin further developed dialectical materialism in his 1909 book Materialism and Empirio-criticism, which connects his opponents' political conceptions to their anti-materialist philosophies.

A more naturalist-oriented materialist school of thought that developed in the mid-19th century was German materialism, which included Ludwig Büchner (1824–1899), the Dutch-born Jacob Moleschott (1822–1893), and Carl Vogt (1817–1895),[34][35] even though they had different views on core issues such as the evolution and the origins of life.[36]

### Contemporary history

See also: Philosophy:Contemporary philosophy

#### Analytic philosophy

See also: Physicalism and Scientific materialism

Contemporary analytic philosophers (e.g. Daniel Dennett, Willard Van Orman Quine, Donald Davidson, and Jerry Fodor) operate within a broadly physicalist or scientific materialist framework, producing rival accounts of how best to accommodate the mind, including functionalism, anomalous monism, and identity theory.[37]

Scientific materialism is often synonymous with, and has typically been described as, a reductive materialism. In the early 21st century, Paul and Patricia Churchland[38][39] advocated a radically contrasting position (at least in regard to certain hypotheses): eliminative materialism. Eliminative materialism holds that some mental phenomena simply do not exist at all, and that talk of such phenomena reflects a spurious "folk psychology" and introspection illusion. A materialist of this variety might believe that a concept like "belief" has no basis in fact (e.g. the way folk science speaks of demon-caused illnesses).

With reductive materialism at one end of a continuum (our theories will reduce to facts) and eliminative materialism at the other (certain theories will need to be eliminated in light of new facts), revisionary materialism is somewhere in the middle.[37]

In contrast, Christian List argues that the existence of first-person perspectives, i.e., one existing as oneself and not as someone else, refutes physicalism. List argues that since first-personal facts cannot supervene on physical facts, this refutes not only physicalism, but also most forms of dualism that have purely third-personal metaphysics.[40]

#### Continental philosophy

Contemporary continental philosopher Gilles Deleuze has attempted to rework and strengthen classical materialist ideas.[41] Contemporary theorists such as Manuel DeLanda, working with this reinvigorated materialism, have come to be classified as new materialists.[42] New materialism has become its own subfield, with courses on it at major universities, as well as numerous conferences, edited collections and monographs devoted to it.

Jane Bennett's 2010 book Vibrant Matter has been particularly instrumental in bringing theories of monist ontology and vitalism back into a critical theoretical fold dominated by poststructuralist theories of language and discourse.[43] Scholars such as Mel Y. Chen and Zakiyyah Iman Jackson have critiqued this body of new materialist literature for neglecting to consider the materiality of race and gender in particular.[44][45]

Métis scholar Zoe Todd, as well as Mohawk (Bear Clan, Six Nations) and Anishinaabe scholar Vanessa Watts,[46] query the colonial orientation of the race for a "new" materialism.[47] Watts in particular describes the tendency to regard matter as a subject of feminist or philosophical care as a tendency too invested in the reanimation of a Eurocentric tradition of inquiry at the expense of an Indigenous ethic of responsibility.[48] Other scholars, such as Helene Vosters, echo their concerns and have questioned whether there is anything particularly "new" about "new materialism", as Indigenous and other animist ontologies have attested to what might be called the "vibrancy of matter" for centuries.[49] Others, such as Thomas Nail, have critiqued "vitalist" versions of new materialism for depoliticizing "flat ontology" and being ahistorical.[50][51]

Quentin Meillassoux proposed speculative materialism, a post-Kantian return to David Hume also based on materialist ideas.[52]

## Defining "matter"

The nature and definition of matter—like other key concepts in science and philosophy—have occasioned much debate:[53]

* Is there a single kind of matter (hyle) that everything is made of, or are there multiple kinds?
* Is matter a continuous substance capable of expressing multiple forms (hylomorphism)[54] or a number of discrete, unchanging constituents (atomism)?[55]
* Does matter have intrinsic properties (substance theory)[56] or lack them (prima materia)?

One challenge to the conventional concept of matter as tangible "stuff" came with the rise of field physics in the 19th century. Relativity shows that matter and energy (including the spatially distributed energy of fields) are interchangeable. This enables the ontological view that energy is prima materia and matter is one of its forms. In contrast, the Standard Model of particle physics uses quantum field theory to describe all interactions. On this view it could be said that fields are prima materia and the energy is a property of the field.[57] According to the dominant cosmological model, the Lambda-CDM model, less than 5% of the universe's energy density is made up of the "matter" the Standard Model describes, and most of the universe is composed of dark matter and dark energy, with little agreement among scientists about what these are made of.[58]

With the advent of quantum physics, some scientists believed the concept of matter had merely changed, while others believed the conventional position could no longer be maintained. Werner Heisenberg said: "The ontology of materialism rested upon the illusion that the kind of existence, the direct 'actuality' of the world around us, can be extrapolated into the atomic range. This extrapolation, however, is impossible...atoms are not things."[59]

The concept of matter has changed in response to new scientific discoveries. Thus materialism has no definite content independent of the particular theory of matter on which it is based. According to Noam Chomsky, any property can be considered material, if one defines matter such that it has that property.[60]

The philosophical materialist Gustavo Bueno uses a more precise term than matter, the stroma.[61]

In Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, Lenin argues that the truth of dialectical materialism is unrelated to any particular understanding of matter. To him, such changes actually confirm the dialectical form of materialism.[62]

## Physicalism

Main article: Physicalism

George Stack distinguishes between materialism and physicalism:

> In the twentieth century, physicalism has emerged out of positivism. Physicalism restricts meaningful statements to physical bodies or processes that are verifiable or in principle verifiable. It is an empirical hypothesis that is subject to revision and, hence, lacks the dogmatic stance of classical materialism. Herbert Feigl defended physicalism in the United States and consistently held that mental states are brain states and that mental terms have the same referent as physical terms. The twentieth century has witnessed many materialist theories of the mental, and much debate surrounding them.[63]

## Religious and spiritual views

### Christianity

Main article: Philosophy:Materialism and Christianity

## Criticism and alternatives

### From contemporary physicists

Rudolf Peierls, a physicist who played a major role in the Manhattan Project, rejected materialism: "The premise that you can describe in terms of physics the whole function of a human being ... including knowledge and consciousness, is untenable. There is still something missing."[64]

Erwin Schrödinger said, "Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else."[65]

Werner Heisenberg wrote: "The ontology of materialism rested upon the illusion that the kind of existence, the direct 'actuality' of the world around us, can be extrapolated into the atomic range. This extrapolation, however, is impossible ... Atoms are not things."[66]

#### Quantum mechanics

Some 20th-century physicists (e.g., Eugene Wigner[67] and Henry Stapp),[68] and some modern physicists and science writers (e.g., Stephen Barr,[69] Paul Davies, and John Gribbin) have argued that materialism is flawed due to certain recent findings in physics, such as quantum mechanics and chaos theory. According to Gribbin and Davies (1991):

> Then came our Quantum theory, which totally transformed our image of matter. The old assumption that the microscopic world of atoms was simply a scaled-down version of the everyday world had to be abandoned. Newton's deterministic machine was replaced by a shadowy and paradoxical conjunction of waves and particles, governed by the laws of chance, rather than the rigid rules of causality. An extension of the quantum theory goes beyond even this; it paints a picture in which solid matter dissolves away, to be replaced by weird excitations and vibrations of invisible field energy. Quantum physics undermines materialism because it reveals that matter has far less "substance" than we might believe. But another development goes even further by demolishing Newton's image of matter as inert lumps. This development is the theory of chaos, which has recently gained widespread attention.

— Paul Davies and John Gribbin, The Matter Myth, Chapter 1: "The Death of Materialism"

#### Digital physics

The objections of Davies and Gribbin are shared by proponents of digital physics, who view information rather than matter as fundamental. The physicist and proponent of digital physics John Archibald Wheeler wrote, "all matter and all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and this is a participatory universe."[70] Some founders of quantum theory, such as Max Planck, shared their objections. He wrote:

> As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.

— Max Planck, Das Wesen der Materie (1944)

James Jeans concurred with Planck, saying, "The Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter."[71]

### Philosophical objections

In the Critique of Pure Reason, Immanuel Kant argued against materialism in defending his transcendental idealism (as well as offering arguments against subjective idealism and mind–body dualism).[72][73] But Kant argues that change and time require an enduring substrate.[74][75]

Postmodern/poststructuralist thinkers also express skepticism about any all-encompassing metaphysical scheme. Philosopher Mary Midgley[76] argues that materialism is a self-refuting idea, at least in its eliminative materialist form.[77][78][79][80]

#### Varieties of idealism

Arguments for idealism, such as those of Hegel and Berkeley, often take the form of an argument against materialism; indeed, Berkeley's idealism was called immaterialism. Now, matter can be argued to be redundant, as in bundle theory, and mind-independent properties can, in turn, be reduced to subjective percepts. Berkeley gives an example of the latter by pointing out that it is impossible to gather direct evidence of matter, as there is no direct experience of matter; all that is experienced is perception, whether internal or external. As such, matter's existence can only be inferred from the apparent (perceived) stability of perceptions; it finds absolutely no evidence in direct experience.[81]

### Materialism as methodology

Some critics object to materialism as part of an overly skeptical, narrow or reductivist approach to theorizing, rather than to the ontological claim that matter is the only substance. Particle physicist and Anglican theologian John Polkinghorne objects to what he calls promissory materialism—claims that materialistic science will eventually succeed in explaining phenomena it has not so far been able to explain.[82] Polkinghorne prefers "dual-aspect monism" to materialism.[83]

Some scientific materialists have been criticized for failing to provide clear definitions of matter, leaving the term materialism without any definite meaning. Noam Chomsky states that since the concept of matter may be affected by new scientific discoveries, as has happened in the past, scientific materialists are being dogmatic in assuming the opposite.[60]

## See also

* Aleatory materialism
* Antimaterialism beliefs:
* Gnosticism
* Idealism
* Immaterialism
* Maya
* Mind–body dualism
* Platonic realism
* Supernaturalism
* Transcendentalism
* Cārvāka
* Christian materialism
* Critical realism
* Cultural materialism
* Dialectical materialism
* Economic materialism
* Existence
* French materialism
* Grotesque body
* Historical materialism
* Hyle
* Incorporeality
* Madhyamaka, a philosophy of Middle Way
* Marxist philosophy of nature
* Materialist feminism
* Metaphysical naturalism
* Model-dependent realism
* Naturalism
* Philosophical materialism
* Philosophy of mind
* Physicalism
* Postmaterialism
* Quantum energy
* Rational egoism
* Reality in Buddhism
* Scientistic materialism
* Substance theory
* Transcendence

## Notes

a. ^ Indeed, it has been noted it is difficult if not impossible to define one category without contrasting it with the other.[84][85]

## References

1. ↑ "Edward Feser: Against "Neurobabble"". 20 January 2011. https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2011/01/against-neurobabble.html.
2. ↑ "Tyler Burge, A Real Science of Mind - The New York Times". 19 December 2010. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/a-real-science-of-mind/.
3. ↑ "Ancient Atomism". https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atomism-ancient/.
4. ↑ "Epicurus (section 4.2: The Swerve and Collisions)". https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epicurus/.
5. ↑ Tim O’Keefe (2005). "5 “The swerve and collisions”". Epicurus on Freedom. Cambridge University Press. pp. 95‑118.
6. ↑ Axel Honneth, Hans Joas, Social Action and Human Nature, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 18.
7. ↑ Nicholas Churchich, Marxism and Alienation, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990, p. 57: "Although Marx has rejected Feuerbach's abstract materialism," Lenin says that Feuerbach's views "are consistently materialist," implying that Feuerbach's conception of causality is entirely in line with dialectical materialism."
8. ↑ Idoko, Barnabas Obiora (2023-12-14). "A CRITICAL EPOCHAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHICAL MATERIALISM" (in en). Trinitarian: International Journal of Arts and Humanities 2 (1). https://journals.ezenwaohaetorc.org/index.php/TIJAH/article/view/2649.
9. ↑ Edwards, Paul, ed (1972). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan. ISBN 0028949501. ; Priest, Stephen (1991). Theories of the Mind. London: Penguin. ISBN 0140130691. ; Novack, George (1979). The Origins of Materialism. New York: Pathfinder Press. ISBN 0873480228.
10. ↑ Priest, Stephen (1991). Theories of the Mind. London: Penguin. ISBN 0140130691.
11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Novack, George (1979). The Origins of Materialism. New York: Pathfinder Press. ISBN 0873480228.
12. ↑ "Eliminative Materialism". https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/materialism-eliminative/.
13. ↑ Mary Midgley The Myths We Live By.
14. ↑ Marx, Karl. 1873. "Afterword to the Second German Edition," Capital, vol. 1\. Transcribed by H. Kuhls.
15. ↑ Marx, Karl (1873). "Afterword to the Second German Edition". Capital, vol. 1. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/p3.htm.
16. ↑ "Marx's Notebooks on Epicurean Philosophy (1839)". https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1839/notebook/index.htm.
17. ↑ "Doctoral Dissertation of Karl Marx (1841)". https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1841/dr-theses/index.htm.
18. ↑ "Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843)". https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm.
19. ↑ "Marx and Engels on Philosophy: Early Materialism". https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/subject/philosophy/index.htm.
20. ↑ Dore, Isaak (2024). "Chapter 1: The Foundations of Marx's Materialist Epistemology". A Materialist Theory of Justice. pp. 1–38. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74338-2_1. ISBN 978-3-031-74337-5. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-74338-2_1. Retrieved 2025-04-17.
21. ↑ Fodor, Jerry A. 1981. RePresentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ISBN 9780262060790. (Excerpt of Ch. 1).
22. ↑ Berryman, Sylvia (2022). "Ancient Atomism". Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atomism-ancient/.
23. ↑ The Cambridge Companion to Atheism (2006), p. 228, at Google Books
24. ↑ History of Indian Materialism, Ramakrishna Bhattacharya
25. ↑ Urvoy, Dominique. 1996. "The Rationality of Everyday Life: The Andalusian Tradition? (Aropos of Hayy's First Experiences)." pp. 38–46 in The World of Ibn Tufayl: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Ḥayy Ibn Yaqẓān, edited by L. I. Conrad. Brill Publishers, ISBN 90-04-09300-1.
26. ↑ Pierre Gassendi (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
27. ↑ Mahan, A.; Friedrich, R. (2003). A Critical History of Philosophy. Salem Publishing Solutions. pp. 587–589. ISBN 978-1-59160-363-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=MfxPkYVpLqoC&pg=PA588. Retrieved 2024-04-07.
28. ↑ Thomas Hobbes (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy),
29. ↑ Henry, John F. (2012). The Making of Neoclassical Economics (Routledge Revivals). Taylor & Francis. pp. 23–25. ISBN 978-1-136-81053-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=GkCRxNmxfFYC&pg=PA24. Retrieved 2024-04-07.
30. ↑ Brown, Robin; Ladyman, James (2019). Materialism: A Historical and Philosophical Inquiry. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-429-53537-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=6QqWDwAAQBAJ. Retrieved 2024-04-07.
31. ↑ Axel Honneth, Hans Joas, Social Action and Human Nature, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 18.
32. ↑ Nicholas Churchich, Marxism and Alienation, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990, p. 57: "Although Marx has rejected Feuerbach's abstract materialism," Lenin says that Feuerbach's views "are consistently materialist," implying that Feuerbach's conception of causality is entirely in line with dialectical materialism."
33. ↑ see Plekhanov, Georgi: 1891. "For the Sixtieth Anniversary of Hegel's Death;" 1893. Essays on the History of Materialism; and 1895. The Development of the Monist View of History.
34. ↑ Chadwick, Owen. 1990. The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press. p. 165: "During the 1850s German...scientists conducted a controversy known...as the materialistic controversy. It was specially associated with the names of Vogt, Moleschott and Büchner." p. 173: "Frenchmen were surprised to see Büchner and Vogt.... [T]he French were surprised at German materialism."
35. ↑ The Nineteenth Century and After, Vol. 151. 1952. p. 227: "the Continental materialism of Moleschott and Buchner."
36. ↑ Andreas W. Daum, Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert: Bürgerliche Kultur, naturwissenschaftliche Bildung und die deutsche Öffentlichkeit, 1848–1914. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1998, pp. 210, 293–99.
37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 Ramsey, William. [2003] 2019. "Eliminative Materialism § Specific Problems With Folk Psychology" (rev.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
38. ↑ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. ↑ Churchland, P. M. (1981). "Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes". Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90.
40. ↑ List, Christian (2023). "The first-personal argument against physicalism". https://philpapers.org/rec/LISTFA.
41. ↑ Smith, Daniel; Protevi, John (1 January 2015). Zalta, Edward N.. ed. Gilles Deleuze (Winter 2015 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/deleuze/.
42. ↑ Dolphijn, Rick; Tuin, Iris van der (1 January 2013) (in EN). New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Open Humanities Press. ISBN 9781607852810. http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/new-materialism/.
43. ↑ Bennett, Jane (4 January 2010) (in en). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822346333. https://books.google.com/books?id=OcUcmAEACAAJ.
44. ↑ Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman (2013). "Animal: New Directions in the Theorization of Race and Posthumanism". Feminist Studies 39 (3): 669–685. doi:10.1353/FEM.2013.0024. https://www.academia.edu/6169668. Retrieved 2016-05-08.
45. ↑ Chen, Mel Y. (10 July 2012) (in en). Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822352549. https://books.google.com/books?id=Y793tgAACAAJ.
46. ↑ "Dr. Vanessa Watts" (in en-US). 2018-12-12. http://miri.mcmaster.ca/team/dr-vanessa-watts/.
47. ↑ Todd, Zoe (2016). "An Indigenous Feminist's Take On The Ontological Turn: 'Ontology' Is Just Another Word For Colonialism" (in en). Journal of Historical Sociology 29 (1): 4–22. doi:10.1111/johs.12124. ISSN 1467-6443.
48. ↑ Watts, Vanessa (2013-05-04). "Indigenous Place-Thought and Agency Amongst Humans and Non Humans (First Woman and Sky Woman Go On a European World Tour!)" (in en). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 2 (1). ISSN 1929-8692. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/19145.
49. ↑ Schweitzer, M.; Zerdy, J. (14 August 2014) (in en). Performing Objects and Theatrical Things. Springer. ISBN 9781137402455. https://books.google.com/books?id=MEJvBAAAQBAJ.
50. ↑ Nail, Thomas (10 December 2018). Being and motion. New York, NY. pp. 11–54. ISBN 978-0-19-090890-4. OCLC 1040086073.
51. ↑ Gamble, Christopher N.; Hanan, Joshua S.; Nail, Thomas (2019-11-02). "What is New Materialism?". Angelaki 24 (6): 111–134. doi:10.1080/0969725x.2019.1684704. ISSN 0969-725X.
52. ↑ Meillassoux, Quentin. 2008. After Finitude. Bloomsbury, p. 90.
53. ↑ Herbermann, Charles, ed (1913). "Matter". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
54. ↑ "Hylomorphism" Concise Britannica
55. ↑ "Atomism: Antiquity to the Seventeenth Century" Dictionary of the History of Ideas
"Atomism in the Seventeenth Century" Dictionary of the History of Ideas
Article by a philosopher who opposes atomism
Information on Buddhist atomism
Article on traditional Greek atomism
"Atomism from the 17th to the 20th Century" Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
56. ↑ "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on substance theory". Plato.stanford.edu. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/.
57. ↑ José Ignacio Illana; Alejandro Jiménez Cano (2022). "Cornell University". arXiv:2211.14636 [hep-ph].
58. ↑ Bernard Sadoulet "Particle Dark Matter in the Universe: At the Brink of Discovery?" Science 5 January 2007: Vol. 315. no. 5808, pp. 61 - 63
59. ↑ Heisenberg, Werner. 1962. Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science.
60. ↑ 60.0 60.1 Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind
61. ↑ (in en) Gustavo Bueno, Estroma, 22 May 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiY1rfMk2T0, retrieved 2021-12-28
62. ↑ Lenin, Vladimir (1927) (in English). Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. New York: International Publishers (published 2022). pp. 265–272. ISBN 9780717802777.
63. ↑ Stack, George J. (1998), Craig, E., ed., Materialism, Routledge, pp. 171–172, ISBN 978-0-415-18714-5, https://books.google.com/books?id=G3UBxqkkCX8C&pg=PA171
64. ↑ "Matter Undermined". 2 November 2012. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/vedanta/matter-undermined/articleshow/17055344.cms.
65. ↑ "General Scientific and Popular Papers." In Collected Papers, Vol. 4. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Sohn. p. 334.
66. ↑ Heisenberg, Werner. 1962. Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science
67. ↑ Wigner, Eugene Paul (6 December 2012). Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses. Springer. ISBN 9783642783746. https://books.google.com/books?id=EFboCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA252.
68. ↑ Stapp, Henry. "Quantum interactive dualism - an alternative to materialism." Journal of Consciousness Studies
69. ↑ John Farrell. "A Physicist Talks God And The Quantum". Forbes.com. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2017/01/29/a-physicist-talks-god-and-the-quantum/. Retrieved 2022-03-17.
70. ↑ Zurek, Wojciech H., ed. 1990. "Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links." In Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information.
71. ↑ Jeans, James. 1937. The Mysterious Universe. p. 137.
72. ↑ Kant, Immanuel. "The refutation of idealism." pp. 345–52 in Critique of Pure Reason (1st ed.), edited by N. K. Smith. (2nd ed., pp. 244–7).
73. ↑ Kant, Immanuel. "The refutation of idealism." pp. 345–52 in Critique of Pure Reason (1st ed.), edited by N. K. Smith. A379, p. 352: "If, however, as commonly happens, we seek to extend the concept of dualism, and take it in the transcendental sense, neither it nor the two counter-alternatives — pneumatism [idealism] on the one hand, materialism on the other — would have any sort of basis. … Neither the transcendental object which underlies outer appearances nor that which underlies inner intuition, is in itself either matter or a thinking being, but a ground (to us unknown)…"
74. ↑ Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. : "Kant argues that we can determine that there has been a change in the objects of our perception, not merely a change in our perceptions themselves, only by conceiving of what we perceive as successive states of enduring substances (see Substance)."
75. ↑ Kant, Immanuel. "The refutation of idealism." pp. 345–52 in Critique of Pure Reason (1st ed.), edited by N. K. Smith. B274, p. 245: "All determination of time presupposes something permanent in perception. This permanent cannot, however, be something in me…"
76. ↑ Midgley, Mary. 1990. The Myths We Live By.
77. ↑ Baker, L. 1987. Saving Belief. Princeton: Princeton University Press
78. ↑ Reppert, V. 1992. "Eliminative Materialism, Cognitive Suicide, and Begging the Question." Metaphilosophy 23:378–92.
79. ↑ Seidner, Stanley S. 10 June 2009. "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology." Mater Dei Institute. p. 5.
80. ↑ Boghossian, Peter. 1990. "The Status of Content." Philosophical Review 99:157–84; and 1991. "The Status of Content Revisited." Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71:264–78.
81. ↑ de Waal, Cornelis (April 2006). "Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism". Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2): 292–293, 302–303.
82. ↑ However, critics of materialism are equally guilty of prognosticating that it will never be able to explain certain phenomena. "Over a hundred years ago William James saw clearly that science would never resolve the mind–body problem." Are We Spiritual Machines? Dembski, W.
83. ↑ "Interview with John Polkinghorne". Crosscurrents.org. http://www.crosscurrents.org/polkinghorne.htm.
84. ↑ Priest, Stephen (1991). Theories of the Mind. London: Penguin Books. . ISBN 0-14-013069-1, 978-0-14-013069-0.
85. ↑ Novack, George (1979). The Origins of Materialism. New York: Pathfinder Press. ISBN 0-87348-022-8.

## Further reading

* Buchner, L. (1920). Force and Matter. New York, Peter Eckler Publishing Co.
* Churchland, Paul (1981). Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. The Philosophy of Science. Boyd, Richard; P. Gasper; J. D. Trout. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
* Field, Hartry H. (1981), "Mental representation", in Block, Ned Joel, Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, 2, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 9780416746006
* Flanagan, Owen J. (1991). Science of the Mind 2e. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-56056-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=80HIwMz3bvwC. Retrieved 19 December 2012.
* Fodor, J.A. (1974). "Special Sciences", Synthese, Vol. 28.
* Gunasekara, Victor A. (2001). "Buddhism and the Modern World". Basic Buddhism: A Modern Introduction to the Buddha's Teaching". 18 January 2008
* Kim, J. (1994) Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 52.
* La Mettrie, La Mettrie, Julien Offray de (1748). L'Homme Machine (Man a Machine)
* Lange, Friedrich A. (1925) The History of Materialism. New York, Harcourt, Brace, & Co.
* Moser, Paul K.; Trout, J. D. (1995). Contemporary Materialism: A Reader. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-10863-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=-vIzCvCAxpgC. Retrieved 19 December 2012.
* Priest, Stephen (1991), Theories of the Mind, London: Penguin Books, ISBN 0-14-013069-1 Alternative ISBN 978-0-14-013069-0
* Schopenhauer, Arthur (1969). The World as Will and Representation. New York, Dover Publications, Inc.
* Seidner, Stanley S. (10 June 2009). "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology". Mater Dei Institute
* Turner, MS (5 January 2007). "Quarks and the Cosmos". Science 315 (5808): 59–61. doi:10.1126/science.1136276. PMID 17204637. Bibcode: 2007Sci...315...59T.
* Vitzthum, Richard C. (1995) Materialism: An Affirmative History and Definition. Amherst, New York, Prometheus Books.

## External links

* Stanford Encyclopedia:
* Physicalism
* Eliminative Materialism
* Philosophical Materialism (by Richard C. Vitzthum) from infidels.org
* Dictionary of the Philosophy of Mind on Materialism from the University of Waterloo
* A new theory of ideomaterialism being a synthesis of idealism and materialism

* v
* t
* e

Environmental humanities

Art|

* Crop art
* Environmental art
* Environmental sculpture
* Land art
* Landscape painting
* Photography
* conservation
* landscape
* nature
* wildlife
* Sculpture trail
* Site-specific art
* Sustainable art

Culture|

* Cultural ecology
* Cultural landscape
* Ecolinguistics
* Ecological anthropology
* Ecosemiotics
* Environmental anthropology
* Ethnoecology
* Traditional ecological knowledge

Literature|

* Ecocomposition
* Ecocriticism
* Ecopoetry
* Geocriticism
* Nature writing
* Outdoor literature
* Zoopoetics

Philosophy|

* Aesthetics of nature
* Constructivism
* Cosmology
* Critical realism
* Deep ecology
* Ecofeminism
* Ecophenomenology
* Ecosophy
* Environmental ethics
* Environmental justice
* Environmental philosophy
* Materialism
* Natural philosophy
* Philosophy of mind
* Philosophy of science
* Social ecology

Religion|

* Ecotheology
* Environmental theology
* Religion and environmentalism
* Spiritual ecology
* Stewardship

Other|

* Anthrozoology
* Ecomusicology
* Environmental communication
* Environmental education
* adult
* arts-based
* Environmental history
* Environmental interpretation
* Environmental journalism
* Environmental law
* Outdoor education
* Psychogeography
* Thematic interpretation

Related|

* Animal studies
* Bioethics
* Biophilia hypothesis
* Do it yourself (ethic)
* [[Biology:Natural hisNatural history (List of natural history museums|museums]])
* Popular science
* Property theory (common property)
* Science, technology and society
* science studies
* Simple living
* Slow food
* Spirit of place
* Sustainability studies

Applied|

* Arts and Crafts movement
* Acoustic ecology
* Biomimicry
* Ecodesign
* Ecological design
* Ecomuseum
* Educational trail
* Environmental design
* Landscape architecture
* assessment
* planning
* Nature center
* New Urbanism
* Sustainable architecture
* Sustainable design
* Sustainable fashion
* Themed walk
* Urban acupuncture

* Environment portal
* Category
* Commons
* Journals
* Degrees

* v
* t
* e

Metaphysics

Metaphysicians|

* Parmenides
* Plato
* Aristotle
* Plotinus
* Duns Scotus
* Thomas Aquinas
* Francisco Suárez
* Nicolas Malebranche
* René Descartes
* John Locke
* David Hume
* Thomas Reid
* Immanuel Kant
* Isaac Newton
* Arthur Schopenhauer
* Baruch Spinoza
* Georg W. F. Hegel
* George Berkeley
* Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
* Henri Bergson
* Friedrich Nietzsche
* Charles Sanders Peirce
* Joseph Maréchal
* Ludwig Wittgenstein
* Martin Heidegger
* Alfred N. Whitehead
* Bertrand Russell
* Dorothy Emmet
* G. E. Moore
* Jean-Paul Sartre
* Gilbert Ryle
* Hilary Putnam
* P. F. Strawson
* R. G. Collingwood
* Adolph Stöhr
* Rudolf Carnap
* Saul Kripke
* Willard V. O. Quine
* G. E. M. Anscombe
* Donald Davidson
* Michael Dummett
* David Malet Armstrong
* David Lewis
* Alvin Plantinga
* Peter van Inwagen
* Derek Parfit
* more ...

Theories|

* Abstract object theory
* Action theory
* Anti-realism
* Determinism
* Dualism
* Enactivism
* Essentialism
* Existentialism
* Free will
* Idealism
* Libertarianism
* Liberty
* Materialism
* Meaning of life
* Monism
* Naturalism
* Nihilism
* Phenomenalism
* Realism
* Physicalism
* Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality
* Platonic idealism
* Relativism
* Scientific realism
* Solipsism
* Subjectivism
* Substance theory
* Truthmaker theory
* Type theory

Concepts|

* Abstract object
* Anima mundi
* Being
* Category of being
* Causality
* Causal closure
* Choice
* Cogito, ergo sum
* Concept
* Embodied cognition
* Essence
* Existence
* Experience
* Hypostatic abstraction
* Idea
* Identity
* Information
* Insight
* Intelligence
* Intention
* Linguistic modality
* Matter
* Meaning
* Memetics
* Mental representation
* Mind
* Motion
* Nature
* Necessity
* Notion
* Object
* Pattern
* Perception
* Physical object
* Principle
* Property
* Qualia
* Quality
* Reality
* Soul
* Subject
* Substantial form
* Thought
* Time
* Truth
* Type–token distinction
* Universal
* Unobservable
* Value
* more ...

Related topics|

* Axiology
* Cosmology
* Epistemology
* Feminist metaphysics
* Interpretations of quantum mechanics
* Mereology
* Meta-
* Ontology
* Philosophy of mind
* Philosophy of psychology
* Philosophy of self
* Philosophy of space and time
* Teleology
* Theoretical physics

* Category

* v
* t
* e

Philosophy

Branches

| Traditional|

* Metaphysics
* Ontology
* Epistemology
* Logic
* Ethics
* Aesthetics

|

Philosophy of|

* Action
* Art
* Culture
* Design
* Music
* Film
* Business
* Color
* Cosmos
* Dialogue
* Education
* Environment
* Futility
* Happiness
* Healthcare
* History
* Human nature
* Humor
* Feminism
* Language
* Life
* Literature
* Mathematics
* Mind
* Pain
* Psychology
* Philosophy of psychiatry
* Philosophy of perception
* Philosophy
* Religion
* Science
* Physics
* Chemistry
* Biology
* Geography
* Sexuality
* Social science
* Culture
* Economics
* Justice
* Law
* Politics
* Society
* Space and time
* Sport
* Technology
* Artificial intelligence
* Computer science
* Engineering
* Information
* War

Schools of thought

| By era|

* Ancient
* Western
* Medieval
* Renaissance
* Early modern
* Modern
* Contemporary

|

Ancient|

| Chinese|

* Agriculturalism
* Confucianism
* Legalism
* Logicians
* Mohism
* Chinese naturalism
* Neotaoism
* Taoism
* Yangism
* Chan

|

[[Philosophy:Ancient Greek philosopGreco-Hellenistic philosophy|Roman]] |

* Aristotelianism
* Atomism
* Cynicism
* Cyrenaics
* Eleatics
* Eretrian school
* Epicureanism
* Hermeneutics
* Ionian
* Ephesian
* Milesian
* Megarian school
* Neoplatonism
* Peripatetic
* Platonism
* Pluralism
* Presocratic
* Pyrrhonism
* Pythagoreanism
* Neopythagoreanism
* Sophistic
* Stoicism

Indian|

* Hindu
* Samkhya
* Nyaya
* Vaisheshika
* Yoga
* Mīmāṃsā
* Ājīvika
* Ajñana
* Cārvāka
* Jain
* Anekantavada
* Syādvāda
* Buddhist
* Śūnyatā
* Madhyamaka
* Yogacara
* Sautrāntika
* Svatantrika

Persian|

* Mazdakism
* Mithraism
* Zoroastrianism
* Zurvanism

Medieval|

| European|

* Christian
* Augustinianism
* Scholasticism
* Thomism
* Scotism
* Occamism
* Renaissance humanism

|

East Asian|

* Korean Confucianism
* Edo neo-Confucianism
* Neo-Confucianism

Indian|

* Vedanta
* Acintya bheda abheda
* Advaita
* Bhedabheda
* Dvaita
* Nimbarka Sampradaya
* Shuddhadvaita
* Vishishtadvaita
* Navya-Nyāya

Islamic|

* Averroism
* Avicennism
* Illuminationism
* ʿIlm al-Kalām
* Sufi

Jewish|

* Judeo-Islamic

Modern|

| People|

* Cartesianism
* Kantianism
* Neo-Kantianism
* Hegelianism
* Marxism
* Spinozism

|

* Anarchism
* Classical Realism
* Liberalism
* Collectivism
* Conservatism
* Determinism
* Dualism
* Empiricism
* Existentialism
* Foundationalism
* Historicism
* Holism
* Humanism
* Anti-
* Idealism
* Absolute
* British
* German
* Objective
* Subjective
* Transcendental
* Individualism
* Kokugaku
* Materialism
* Modernism
* Monism
* Naturalism
* Natural law
* Nihilism
* New Confucianism
* Neo-scholasticism
* Pragmatism
* Phenomenology
* Positivism
* Reductionism
* Rationalism
* Social contract
* Socialism
* Transcendentalism
* Utilitarianism

Contemporary|

| Analytic|

* Applied ethics
* Analytic feminism
* Analytical Marxism
* Communitarianism
* Consequentialism
* Critical rationalism
* Experimental philosophy
* Falsificationism
* Foundationalism / Coherentism
* Generative linguistics
* Internalism and externalism
* Logical positivism
* Legal positivism
* Normative ethics
* Meta-ethics
* Moral realism
* Quinean naturalism
* Ordinary language philosophy
* Postanalytic philosophy
* Quietism
* Rawlsian
* Reformed epistemology
* Systemics
* Scientism
* Scientific realism
* Scientific skepticism
* Transactionalism
* Contemporary utilitarianism
* Vienna Circle
* Wittgensteinian

|

Continental|

* Critical theory
* Deconstruction
* Existentialism
* Feminist
* Frankfurt School
* New Historicism
* Hermeneutics
* Neo-Marxism
* Phenomenology
* Posthumanism
* Postmodernism
* Post-structuralism
* Social constructionism
* Structuralism
* Western Marxism

Other|

* Kyoto School
* Objectivism
* Postcritique
* Russian cosmism
* more...

Positions

| Aesthetics|

* Formalism
* Institutionalism
* Aesthetic response

|

Ethics|

* Consequentialism
* Deontology
* Virtue

Free will|

* Compatibilism
* Determinism
* Hard
* Incompatibilism
* Hard
* Libertarianism

Metaphysics|

* Atomism
* Dualism
* Monism
* Naturalism

Epistemology|

* Constructivism
* Empiricism
* Idealism
* Particularism
* Fideism
* Rationalism
* /Nihilism-->
* Solipsism

Mind|

* Behaviorism
* Emergentism
* Eliminativism
* Epiphenomenalism
* Functionalism
* Objectivism
* Subjectivism

Normativity|

* Absolutism
* Particularism
* Relativism
* Nihilism
* Skepticism
* Universalism

Ontology|

* Action
* Event
* Process

Reality|

* Anti-realism
* Conceptualism
* Idealism
* Materialism
* Naturalism
* Nominalism
* Physicalism
* Realism

* By region
* Related lists
* Miscellaneous

| By region|

* African
* Ethiopian
* Amerindian
* Aztec
* Eastern
* Chinese
* Egyptian
* Indian
* Indonesian
* Iranian
* Japanese
* Korean
* Pakistani
* Vietnamese
* Western
* American
* Australian
* British
* Czech
* Danish
* French
* German
* Greek
* Italian
* Polish
* Romanian
* Russian
* Slovene
* Spanish
* Turkish

|

Lists|

* Outline
* Index
* Years
* Problems
* Schools
* Glossary
* Philosophers
* Movements
* Publications

Miscellaneous|

* Natural law
* Sage
* Theoretical philosophy / Practical philosophy
* Women in philosophy

* Portal
* Category
* Book

* v
* t
* e

Philosophy of mind

Theories|

* Behaviorism (Radical)
* Biological naturalism
* Cognitive psychology
* Computationalism
* Mind–body dualism
* Eliminative materialism
* Emergent materialism
* Emergentism
* Epiphenomenalism
* Functionalism
* Idealism
* Interactionism
* Materialism
* Monism
* Naïve realism
* Neurophenomenology
* Neutral monism
* Occasionalism
* Panpsychism
* Psychoanalysis
* Parallelism
* Phenomenalism
* Phenomenology
* Physicalism
* identity theory
* Property dualism
* Representational
* Solipsism
* Substance dualism

Concepts|

* Abstract object
* Artificial intelligence
* Chinese room
* Cognition
* Cognitive closure
* Concept
* Concept and object
* Consciousness
* Hard problem of consciousness
* Hypostatic abstraction
* Idea
* Identity
* Ingenuity
* Intelligence
* Intentionality
* Introspection
* Intuition
* Language of thought
* Materialism
* Mental event
* Mental image
* Mental property
* Mental representation
* Mind
* Mind–body problem
* Non-physical entity
* New mysterianism
* Pain
* Privileged access
* Problem of other minds
* Propositional attitude
* Qualia
* Tabula rasa
* Understanding
* Zombie
* more...

Related topics|

* Metaphysics
* Philosophy of artificial intelligence / information / perception / self

* Category
* Philosophers category
* Project
* Task Force

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Materialism&oldid=4019666"
*[c.]: circa
*[a.k.a.]: also known as
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template