Meaning (linguistics)

In linguistics, meaning is the information or concepts that a sender intends to convey, or does convey, in communication with a receiver.[1][2]

## Contents

* 1 The sources of ambiguity
* 1.1 Pragmatics
* 1.2 Semantic meaning
* 1.3 Conceptual meaning
* 2 Semiotics
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 Further reading
* 6 External links

## The sources of ambiguity

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Meaning" linguistics – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

|

Ambiguity means confusion about what is conveyed, since the current context may lead to different interpretations of meaning. Many words in many languages have multiple definitions. Ambiguity is an effect of a rupture of the rule of identity in the context of the exchange of information. Particularly the sender may be physically absent, and the contexts explicitly divergent, such as will be the case when the receptor is a reader and the sender was a writer.

### Pragmatics

Main article: Philosophy:Pragmatics

Pragmatics is the study of how context affects meaning. The two primary forms of context important to pragmatics are linguistic context and situation context.

Linguistic context is how meaning is understood without relying on intent and assumptions. In applied pragmatics, for example, meaning is formed through sensory experiences, even though sensory stimulus cannot be easily articulated in language or signs. Pragmatics, then, reveals that meaning is both something affected by and affecting the world. Meaning is something contextual with respect to language and the world, and is also something active toward other meanings and the world. Linguistic context becomes important when looking at particular linguistic problems such as that of pronouns.

Situation context refers to every non-linguistic factor that affects the meaning of a phrase. An example of situation context can be seen in the phrase "it's cold in here", which can either be a simple statement of fact or a request to turn up the heat, depending on, among other things, whether or not it is believed to be in the listener's power to affect the temperature.

### Semantic meaning

Main article: Philosophy:Semantics

The relationship between words and their referents is called semantics.[3] Semantics is the study of how meaning is conveyed through signs and language. Understanding how facial expressions, body language, and tone affect meaning, and how words, phrases, sentences, and punctuation relate to meaning are examples. Various subgroups of semantics are studied within the fields of linguistics, logic and computing. For example, linguistic semantics includes the history of how words have been used in the past; logical semantics includes how people mean and refer in terms of likely intent and assumptions.

During the 19th century, John Stuart Mill defined semantic meaning with the words "denotation" and "connotation".[4] A denotation is the literal or primary meaning of a word. Connotations are ideas or feelings that a word invokes for a person in addition to its literal or primary meaning.

The original use of "meaning" as understood early in the 20th century occurred through Lady Welby, after her daughter translated the term "semantics" from French.

### Conceptual meaning

Main article: Philosophy:Concept

Languages allow information to be conveyed even when the specific words used are not known by the reader or listener. People connect words with meaning and use words to refer to concepts. A person's intentions affect what is meant. Meaning (in English) as intent harkens back to the Anglo-Saxons and is associated today still, with the German verb meinen as to think or intend.

## Semiotics

Main article: Philosophy:Semiotics

Ferdinand de Saussure, in founding semiology, his original subset of the semiotics, started describing language in terms of Signs, dividing those signs in turn into signifieds and signifiers. The signifier is the perceptive side of a sign, thus the sound form in case of oral language. The signified is the signification (semantic) side, the mental construction or image associated with the sound, by either a speaker and hearer. A sign, then, is essentially a relationship between signified and signifier.

Signs are essentially conventional, as any foreign language student is well aware: there is no reason that bat couldn't mean "body of water" or even "that bust of Napoleon over there". Since the choice of signifiers is ultimately arbitrary, the meaning cannot somehow be in the signifier. Saussure instead defers meaning to the sign itself: meaning is ultimately the same thing as the sign, and meaning means that relationship is between signified and signifier. All meaning is both within us and communal, thus cultural. Signs "mean" by reference to our internal lexicon and grammar, and despite there being a matter of convention, so the communal part, signs also, because of the individual's uniqueness, can mean something only to the individual (what red means to one person may not be what red means to another, either in absolute value, or by including what's suggested by the context). However, while meanings carried by one given set of signifiers may vary to some extent from individual to individual, only those meanings that stay within a boundary are seen by other speakers of the language to belong to the language: if one were to refer to smells as red, most other speakers would assume the person is talking nonsense (although statements like this are common among people who experience synesthesia, or in poetry).

## See also

Fields

* General semantics
* Semiotics
* Pragmatics

Perspectives

* Logical positivism
* Ordinary language philosophy
* Sense and reference

Theories

* Causal theory of names
* Definite descriptions
* Theory of descriptions
* Universal grammar

Considerations

* Ideasthesia
* Idea
* Image
* Information
* Meaning (non-linguistic)
* Metaphor
* Sense
* Symbol
* Symbol grounding
* Sphoṭa

Important theorists

* J. L. Austin
* Roland Barthes
* Rudolf Carnap
* Noam Chomsky
* Eugenio Coseriu
* Umberto Eco
* Viktor Frankl
* Gottlob Frege
* Edmund Husserl
* Paul Grice
* Roman Jakobson
* Saul Kripke
* Claude Lévi-Strauss
* Charles Sanders Peirce
* Bertrand Russell
* Ferdinand de Saussure
* John Searle
* P. F. Strawson
* Willard Van Orman Quine
* Ludwig Wittgenstein

## References

1. ↑ "meaning". Random House, Inc.. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/meaning. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
2. ↑ Nick Sanchez. "Communication Process". New Jersey Institute of Technology. http://web.njit.edu/~lipuma/352comproc/comproc.htm. Retrieved January 14, 2012.
3. ↑ https://tr.scribd.com/document/137895627/В-Н-Комиссаров-Коралова
4. ↑ Fred Wilson (Jan 3, 2002). "John Stuart Mill". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/#LanLog. Retrieved October 8, 2010.

## Further reading

* Akmajian, Adrian, Richard Demers, Ann Farmer, and Robert Harnish. Linguistics: an introduction to language and communication, 4th edition. 1995. Cambridge: MIT Press.
* Allan, Keith. Linguistic Meaning, Volume One. 1986. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
* Austin, J. L. How to Do Things With Words. 1962. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
* Bacon, Sir Francis, Novum Organum, 1620.
* Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality : A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. 1967. First Anchor Books Edition. 240 pages.
* Blackmore, John T., "Section 2, Communication", Foundation theory, 2000. Sentinel Open Press.
* Blackmore, John T., "Prolegomena", Ernst Mach's Philosophy - Pro and Con, 2009. Sentinel Open Press.
* Blackmore, John T. Semantic Dialogues or Ethics versus Rhetoric, 2010, Sentinel Open Press
* Chase, Stuart, The Tyranny of Words, New York, 1938. Harcourt, Brace and Company
* Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Meaning, 2nd edition. 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
* Dummett, Michael. Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd Edition. 1981. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
* Frege, Gottlob. The Frege Reader. Edited by Michael Beaney. 1997. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
* Gauker, Christopher. Words without Meaning. 2003. MIT Press
* Goffman, Erving. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. 1959. Anchor Books.
* Grice, Paul. Studies in the Way of Words. 1989. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
* Hayakawa, S.I. The Use and Misuse of Language, 11th edition, 1962 [1942]. Harper and Brothers.
* James, William. William James on Habit, Will, Truth, and the Meaning of Life. Edited by James Sloan Allen. 2014. Savannah: Frederic C. Beil, Publisher.
* Ogden, C.K. and I.A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning, New York, 1923. Harcourt Brace & World.
* Schiller, F.C.S., Logic for Use, London, 1929. G. Bell.
* Searle, John and Daniel Vanderveken. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. 1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* Searle, John. Speech Acts. 1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* Searle, John. Expression and Meaning. 1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* Stonier, Tom: Information and Meaning. An Evolutionary Perspective. 1997. XIII, 255 p. 23,5 cm.

## External links

* "Conceptual role semantics" by Ned Block
* A summary of Wittgenstein's view of meaning
* Broken Link. Unclaimed page. Meaning at CCMS
* Meaning from a translator's point of view
* Broken Link. Site is now business blog. Meaning.ch - research group
* Broken Link. Unclaimed page. Semiotics and Saussure at CCMS
* USECS as the general catalog of meanings

Links to related articles

* v
* t
* e

Analytic philosophy

Related articles|

| Areas of focus|

* Epistemology
* Language
* Mathematics
* Science

|

Turns|

* Aretaic
* Linguistic

Logic|

* Classical
* Mathematical
* Non-classical
* Philosophical

Theories|

* Anti-realism
* Australian realism
* Descriptivist theory of names
* Emotivism
* Functionalism
* Analytical feminism
* Logical atomism
* Logical positivism
* Analytical Marxism
* Neopragmatism
* Neurophilosophy
* Ordinary language
* Quietism
* Scientific structualism
* Sense data

Concepts|

* Analysis (Paradox)
* Analytic–synthetic distinction
* Counterfactual
* Natural kind
* Reflective equilibrium
* Supervenience

| Modality|

* Actualism
* Necessity
* Possibility
* Possible world
* Realism
* Rigid designator

|

Philosophers|

* Nick Bostrom
* Noam Chomsky
* Patricia Churchland
* David Chalmers
* James F. Conant
* Alice Crary
* Daniel Dennett
* Cora Diamond
* Keith Donnellan
* Paul Feyerabend
* Bas van Fraassen
* Gottlob Frege
* Jerry Fodor
* Ian Hacking
* Jaegwon Kim
* Alasdair MacIntyre
* J. L. Mackie
* Ruth Millikan
* Ernest Nagel
* Thomas Nagel
* Derek Parfit
* Karl Popper
* Graham Priest
* John Searle
* Peter Singer
* J. J. C. Smart
* Ernest Sosa
* Barry Stroud
* Charles Taylor
* Michael Walzer

| Cambridge|

* Charlie Broad
* Norman Malcolm
* G. E. Moore
* Bertrand Russell
* Frank P. Ramsey
* Ludwig Wittgenstein

|

Oxford|

* G. E. M. Anscombe
* J. L. Austin
* A. J. Ayer
* Michael Dummett
* Antony Flew
* Philippa Foot
* Peter Geach
* Paul Grice
* R. M. Hare
* Gilbert Ryle
* P. F. Strawson
* Richard Swinburne
* Bernard Williams
* Timothy Williamson

Berlin Circle|

* Carl Gustav Hempel
* Hans Reichenbach

Vienna Circle|

* Rudolf Carnap
* Kurt Gödel
* Otto Neurath
* Moritz Schlick

Harvard|

* Roderick Chisholm
* Donald Davidson
* Nelson Goodman
* Christine Korsgaard
* Thomas Kuhn
* Robert Nozick
* Hilary Putnam
* W. V. O. Quine
* John Rawls

Pittsburgh School|

* Robert Brandom
* John McDowell
* Nicholas Rescher
* Wilfrid Sellars

Princeton|

* David Lewis
* Saul Kripke
* Richard Rorty

Notre Dame|

* Robert Audi
* Peter van Inwagen
* Alvin Plantinga

* Category
* Index

* v
* t
* e

Philosophy of language

Index of language articles

Philosophers|

* Plato (Cratylus)
* Gorgias
* Confucius
* Xunzi
* Aristotle
* Stoics
* Pyrrhonists
* Scholasticism
* Ibn Rushd
* Ibn Khaldun
* Thomas Hobbes
* Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
* Johann Herder
* Ludwig Noiré
* Wilhelm von Humboldt
* Fritz Mauthner
* Paul Ricœur
* Ferdinand de Saussure
* Gottlob Frege
* Franz Boas
* Paul Tillich
* Edward Sapir
* Leonard Bloomfield
* Zhuangzi
* Henri Bergson
* Lev Vygotsky
* Ludwig Wittgenstein
* Philosophical Investigations
* Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
* Bertrand Russell
* Rudolf Carnap
* Jacques Derrida
* Of Grammatology
* Limited Inc
* Benjamin Lee Whorf
* Gustav Bergmann
* J. L. Austin
* Noam Chomsky
* Hans-Georg Gadamer
* Saul Kripke
* A. J. Ayer
* G. E. M. Anscombe
* Jaakko Hintikka
* Michael Dummett
* Donald Davidson
* Roger Gibson
* Paul Grice
* Gilbert Ryle
* P. F. Strawson
* Willard Van Orman Quine
* Hilary Putnam
* David Lewis
* John Searle
* Joxe Azurmendi
* Scott Soames
* Stephen Yablo
* John Hawthorne
* Stephen Neale
* Paul Watzlawick

Theories|

* Causal theory of reference
* Contrast theory of meaning
* Contrastivism
* Conventionalism
* Cratylism
* Deconstruction
* Descriptivism
* Direct reference theory
* Dramatism
* Expressivism
* Linguistic determinism
* Mediated reference theory
* Nominalism
* Non-cognitivism
* Phallogocentrism
* Relevance theory
* Semantic externalism
* Semantic holism
* Structuralism
* Supposition theory
* Symbiosism
* Theological noncognitivism
* Theory of descriptions (Definite description)
* Unilalianism
* Verification theory

Concepts|

* Ambiguity
* Cant
* Linguistic relativity
* Meaning
* Language
* Truth-bearer
* Proposition
* Use–mention distinction
* Concept
* Categories
* Set
* Class
* Family resemblance
* Intension
* Logical form
* Metalanguage
* Mental representation
* Presupposition
* Principle of compositionality
* Property
* Sign
* Sense and reference
* Speech act
* Symbol
* Entity
* Sentence
* Statement
* more...

Related articles|

* Analytic philosophy
* Philosophy of information
* Philosophical logic
* Linguistics
* Pragmatics
* Rhetoric
* Semantics
* Formal semantics
* Semiotics

* Category
* Task Force
* Discussion

* v
* t
* e

Logic

* Outline
* History

Fields|

* Computer science
* Inference
* Philosophy of logic
* Proof
* Semantics
* Syntax

| Logics|

* Classical
* Informal
* Critical thinking
* Reason
* Mathematical
* Non-classical
* Philosophical

|

Theories|

* Argumentation
* Metalogic
* Metamathematics
* Set

Foundations|

* Abduction
* Analytic and synthetic propositions
* Contradiction
* Paradox
* Antinomy
* Deduction
* Deductive closure
* Definition
* Description
* Entailment
* Linguistic
* Form
* Induction
* Logical truth
* Name
* Necessity and sufficiency
* Premise
* Probability
* Reference
* Statement
* Substitution
* Truth
* Validity

Lists|

| topics|

* Mathematical logic
* Boolean algebra
* Set theory

|

other|

* Logicians
* Rules of inference
* Paradoxes
* Fallacies
* Logic symbols

*   * Category
* WikiProject (talk)
* changes

0.00

(0 votes)

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Meaning_(linguistics)&oldid=1026726"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template