Positive liberty

Short description: Ability to fulfill one's purposes

Part of a series on

Liberalism

History

* Age of Enlightenment
* List of liberal theorists (contributions to liberal theory)

Ideas

* Civil and political rights
* Cultural liberalism
* Democracy
* Democratic capitalism
* Economic freedom
* Economic liberalism
* Egalitarianism
* Free market
* Free trade
* Freedom of the press
* Freedom of religion
* Freedom of speech
* Gender equality
* Harm principle
* Internationalism
* Laissez-faire
* Liberty
* Market economy
* Natural and legal rights
* Negative/positive liberty
* Non-aggression Principle
* Open society
* Permissive society
* Private property
* Rule of law
* Secularism
* Separation of church and state
* Social contract
* Welfare state

Schools of thought

* Anarcho-capitalism
* Classical liberalism
* Radical liberalism
* Left-libertarianism
* Geolibertarianism
* Right-libertarianism
* Conservative liberalism
* Democratic liberalism
* Green liberalism
* Liberal autocracy
* Liberal Catholicism
* Liberal conservatism
* Liberal feminism
* Equity feminism
* Liberal internationalism
* Liberal nationalism
* Liberal socialism
* Social democracy
* Muscular liberalism
* Neoliberalism
* National liberalism
* Ordoliberalism
* Radical centrism
* Religious liberalism
* Christian
* Islamic
* Jewish
* Secular liberalism
* Social liberalism
* Technoliberalism
* Third Way
* Whiggism

People

* Acton
* Alain
* Alberdi
* Alembert
* Arnold
* Aron
* Barante
* Bastiat
* Bentham
* Berlin
* Beveridge
* Bobbio
* Brentano
* Bright
* Broglie
* Burke
* Čapek
* Cassirer
* Chicherin
* Chu
* Chydenius
* Cobden
* Collingdood
* Condorcet
* Constant
* Croce
* Cuoco
* Dahrendorf
* Decy
* Dewey
* Dickens
* Diderot
* Dongsun
* Dunoyer
* Dworkin
* Emerson
* Eötvös
* Flach
* Friedman
* Galbraith
* Garrison
* George
* Gladstone
* Gobetti
* Gomes
* Gray
* Green
* Gu
* Guizot
* Hayek
* Herbert
* Hobbes
* Hobhouse
* Hobson
* Holbach
* Hu
* Humboldt
* Jefferson
* Jubani
* Kant
* Kelsen
* Kemal
* Keynes
* Korais
* Korwin-Mikke
* Kymplcka
* Lamartine
* Larra
* Lecky
* Li
* Locke
* Lufti
* Macaulay
* Madariaga
* Madison
* Martineau
* Masani
* Michelet
* Mill (father)
* Mill (son)
* Milton
* Mises
* Molteno
* Mommsen
* Money
* Montalembert
* Montesquieu
* Mora
* Mouffe
* Naoroji
* Naumann
* Nozick
* Nussbaum
* Ohlin
* Ortega
* Paine
* Paton
* Popper
* Price
* Priestley
* Prieto
* Quesnay
* Qin
* Ramírez
* Rathenau
* Rawls
* Raz
* Renan
* Renouvier
* Ricardo
* Röpke
* Rorthy
* Rosmini
* Rosselli
* Rousseau
* Ruggiero
* Sarmiento
* Say
* Sen
* Earl of Shaftesbury
* Shklar
* Sidney
* Sieyès
* Şinasi
* Sismondi
* Smith
* Soto Polar
* Spencer
* Spinoza
* Staël
* Sumner
* Tahtawi
* Tao
* Thierry
* Thorbecke
* Thoreau
* Tocqueville
* Tracy
* Troeltsch
* Turgot
* Villemain
* Voltaire
* Ward
* Weber
* Wollstonecraft
* Zambrano

Organizations

* Africa Liberal Network
* Alliance of Liberals
and Democrats for Europe
* Alliance of Liberals
and Democrats for Europe Party
* Arab Liberal Federation
* Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats
* European Democratic Party
* European Liberal Youth
* European Party for Individual Liberty
* International Alliance of Libertarian Parties
* International Federation of Liberal Youth
* Liberal International
* Liberal Network for Latin America
* Liberal parties
* Liberal South East European Network

Regional variants

* Europe
* Latin America
* Albania
* Armenia
* Australia
* Austria
* Belgium
* Bolivia
* Brazil
* Bulgaria
* Canada
* China
* Chile
* Colombia
* Croatia
* Cuba
* Cyprus
* Czech lands
* Denmark
* Ecuador
* Egypt
* Estonia
* Finland
* France
* Germany
* Greece
* Honduras
* Hong Kong
* Hungary
* Iceland
* India
* Iran
* Israel
* Italy
* Japan
* Latvia
* Lithuania
* Luxembourg
* Macedonia
* Mexico
* Moldova
* Montenegro
* Netherlands
* New Zealand
* Nicaragua
* Nigeria
* Norway
* Panama
* Paraguay
* Peru
* Philippines
* Poland
* Portugal
* Romania
* Russia
* Senegal
* Serbia
* Slovakia
* Slovenia
* Spain
* South Africa
* South Korea
* Sweden
* Switzerland
* Taiwan
* Thailand
* Tunisia
* Turkey
* Ukraine
* United Kingdom
* United States
* Classical
* Modern
* Uruguay
* Venezuela
* Zimbabwe

Related topics

* Bias in academia
* Bias in the media

*   *

* v
* t
* e

Positive liberty, or positive freedom, is the possession of the power and resources to act in the context of the structural limitations of the broader society which impacts a person's ability to act, as opposed to negative liberty, which is freedom from external restraint on one's actions.[1][2]

The concepts of structure and agency are central to the concept of positive liberty because in order to be free, a person should be free from inhibitions of the social structure in carrying out their ambitions. Structurally, classism, sexism, ageism, ableism and racism can inhibit a person's freedom. As positive liberty is primarily concerned with the possession of sociological agency, it is enhanced by the ability of citizens to participate in government and have their voices, interests, and concerns recognized and acted upon.

Isaiah Berlin's essay "Two Concepts of Liberty" (1958) is typically acknowledged as the first to explicitly draw the distinction between positive and negative liberty.[3][4]

## Contents

* 1 Overview
* 2 History
* 3 Examples
* 4 See also
* 5 References
* 6 Further reading

## Overview

Timothy Snyder argues that positive freedom is necessary for flourishing democracies and societies, whereas negative freedom is more conducive to autocrats.[5]

Charles Taylor distinguishes positive freedom from negative freedom, which defines freedom exclusively in terms of the independence of the individual from interference by others, be these governments, corporations, or private persons; this theory is challenged by those who believe that freedom resides at least in part in collective control over the common life. He criticizes negative liberty for being too simplistic and not taking into account the importance of individual self-realization, while real liberty is achieved when significant social and economic inequalities are also considered.[6]

## History

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory of freedom, according to which individual freedom is achieved through participation in the process whereby one's community exercises collective control over its own affairs in accordance with the "general will".[7] He wrote: "The mere impulse to appetite is slavery, while obedience to law we prescribe ourselves is liberty."[8] For him, the passage from the state of nature to the civil state substitutes justice for instinct gives his actions the morality they had formerly lacked.[9]

G. W. F. Hegel wrote in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right (in the part in which he introduced the concept of the sphere of abstract right) that "duty is not a restriction on freedom, but only on freedom in the abstract" and that "duty is the attainment of our essence, the winning of positive freedom".[10]

In the Anglophone analytic tradition, the distinction between negative and positive liberty was introduced by Isaiah Berlin in his 1958 lecture "Two Concepts of Liberty". [11]

## Examples

In the description of positive liberty from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,

> Put in the simplest terms, one might say that a democratic society is a free society because it is a self-determined society, and that a member of that society is free to the extent that he or she participates in its democratic process. But there are also individualist applications of the concept of positive freedom. For example, it is sometimes said that a government should aim actively to create the conditions necessary for people to be self-sufficient or to achieve self-realization.[7]

Isaiah Berlin opposed any suggestion that paternalism and positive liberty could be equivalent.[12] He stated that positive liberty could only apply when the withdrawal of liberty from a person was in pursuit of a choice that he or she made, not a general principle of society or any other person's opinion. In the case where a person removes a driver's car keys against their will because they have had too much to drink, this constitutes positive freedom only if the driver has made, of their own free will, an earlier decision not to drive drunk. Thus, by removing the keys, the other person facilitates this decision and ensures that it will be upheld in the face of paradoxical behaviour (i.e., drinking) by the driver. For the remover to remove the keys in the absence of such an expressed intent by the driver, because the remover feels that the driver ought not to drive drunk, is paternalism, and not positive freedom by Berlin's definition.[12]

Erich Fromm sees the distinction between the two types of freedom emerging alongside humanity's evolution away from the instinctual activity that characterizes lower animal forms. This aspect of freedom, he argues, "is here used not in its positive sense of 'freedom to' but in its negative sense of 'freedom from', namely freedom from instinctual determination of his actions."[13] For Fromm, freedom from animal instinct implicitly implies that survival now hinges on the necessity of charting one's own course. He relates this distinction to the biblical story of man's expulsion from Eden:

> Acting against God's orders means freeing himself from coercion, emerging from the unconscious existence of prehuman life to the level of man. Acting against the command of authority, committing a sin is in its positive human aspect, the first act of freedom, that is, the first human act.[14]

Positive freedom, Fromm maintains, comes through the actualization of individuality in balance with the separation from the whole: a "solidarity with all men", united not by instinctual or predetermined ties, but on the basis of a freedom founded on reason.[15]

## See also

* Mutual liberty
* Negative and positive rights
* Real freedom
* Rule according to higher law
* The Trap (TV documentary series)

## References

1. ↑ Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. 1969.
2. ↑ Steven J. Heyman, "Positive and negative liberty." Chicago-Kent Law Review. 68 (1992): 81-90. online
3. ↑ Eric Nelson, "Liberty: One or Two Concepts Liberty: One Concept Too Many?." Political theory 33.1 (2005): 58-78.
4. ↑ Bruce Baum and Robert Nichols, (eds.), Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom: ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ 50 Years Later, (Routledge, 2013).
5. ↑ Snyder, Timothy (2024). On freedom. London: The Bodley Head. ISBN 978-1-84792-805-4.
6. ↑ Charles Taylor, "What's Wrong With Negative Liberty", in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 211–229.
7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Carter, Ian. "Positive and Negative Liberty". in Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/.
8. ↑ Rousseau as quoted by Replogle, Ron. Recovering the Social Contract. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. (1989), p. 105.
9. ↑ Michael Rosen, Jonathan Wolff, Catriona McKinnon (eds.), Political Thought, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 63.
10. ↑ George Klosko, History of Political Theory: An Introduction: Volume II: Modern (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 465: "we should note that Hegel's realization of the distance between his own and the traditional liberal conception of freedom, which he calls "abstract freedom," is clear in his embrace of positive freedom [in PR §149A]".
11. ↑ Berlin, I. (1958). "Two Concepts of Liberty". In Berlin, I. (1969): Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 "Isaiah Berlin's 'Two Concepts of Liberty' (1958)". Open University. http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=170287.
13. ↑ Erich Fromm, The Fear of Freedom (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966), p. 26.
14. ↑ Erich Fromm, The Fear of Freedom, pp. 27–28.
15. ↑ Erich Fromm, The Fear of Freedom, p. 29.

## Further reading

* Machan, Tibor (2008). "Positive Liberty". in Hamowy, Ronald. The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; Cato Institute. pp. 383–85. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n236. ISBN 978-1412965804. OCLC 750831024. https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC.
* Nicholas Dent, Rousseau, Routledge, 2005.

* v
* t
* e

Liberty

Concepts|

* Cognitive liberty
* Moral responsibility
* Personification of Liberty
* Libertas
* Negative liberty
* Positive liberty
* Rights
* Self-ownership
* Social liberty
* Free will

By type|

* Academic
* Civil
* Economic
* Intellectual
* Morphological
* Political

By right|

* Assembly
* Association
* Choice
* Education
* Gun
* Information
* Life
* Movement
* Press
* Property
* Religion
* Public speech
* Thought

0.00

(0 votes)

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive liberty. Read more

|

Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Positive_liberty&oldid=4425225"
*[v]: View this template
*[t]: Discuss this template
*[e]: Edit this template